Ron Paul isn't leading, directing, or making a lot of the key decisions involved in his campaign. A President has to do all that. He has not been able to get Congress to work with him, and that won't change if he were to become President.
I have confidence that Mitt Romney will put country before world. In reading his book Turnaround, even in the prologue I could tell that he has the American spirit in his heart.
Mitt Romney lives the American dream and he will not let that dream be overcome by some global agenda. If I get the time I think I'll make a video about his prologue. It is inspiring.
I suggest you ask your candidate of choice exactly how they are going to do that. Will they spout out the ideas and then expect the next generation to actually do it for them.
Mitt Romney may not promote the grandest policies, but through simple tax cuts, and smarter spending he will lighten the burden that the government puts on the backs of its people.
True Romney doesn't have a comprehensive domestic nor foreign policy plan. His past tax voting record belies the talk now and frankly isn't sufficient to save the economic woes we are in and face in the near future. He is ill equipped to deal with economic and foreign issues.
Frankly Ron Paul is ill equiped to run his own campaign, let alone a country. That is why his best campaign efforts have all been done by outside sources. Yes you have all done a great job raising money and awareness of your candidate, but you don't seem to realize that you can't do his job for him once he is in office. He doesn't seem to realize it either.
I hardly think Dr. Paul needs help once he's in office he's quite, no more capable than any other candidate. Especially at guiding both sides of the aisle toward the higher aim of constitutionally sound legislation, appointments to the supreme court etc. His campaign and the funding comes from exactly where all the candidates should get their support, from we the payers, we the people- not big interests, corporations, lobbyists etc. JMHO
If you are worried about the CFR then you need to work with others to ensure that they are impotent. I am not willing to pin my hopes for the future on one person. Or even a group. We the PEOPLE need to stand up against this North American Union. I think it merits a Constitutional Ammendment to prevent this back door approach. If we ever enter into another Union it needs to be well thought out and open.
Communism was very real when McCarthy started labeling people as Communists. However, all he did was lable them, and destroy their lives. He did not provide actual proof that they were Communist.
When you actually start providing proof, rather than just leveling charges I will accept it as more than just a witchhunt.
It is a case of the seriousness of the charge being more important than whether it is true or not.
Honestly, this whole CFR NWO thing is begining to take on some of the characteristics of McCarthyism. It is a bit of a witchhunt. What makes it worse is that each group seems to be conducting its own witchhunt. If it isn't CFR it might be socialist, chickenhawk, unpatriotic, anti-troop, neocon, or some other lable.
Search "bush new world order" here on you tube. In the first few videos, you see GHWB talk abou this new world order, then at the end of one Gary Hart, at a CFR meeting, tells hoe GW can use 911 to carry out his father's NWO.
5M1L3 Not at all. CFR spokespersons and written goals have stated the individual sovereign, even state sovereignty must go. They truly want a National/International entity made of our republic so as to better merge the global agenda.
Honestly, I don't know, Romney seems awfully chummy with the Carlyle Group. Anyway, a very important feature of just how similar you and I are. You cannot stand Canario for coming in and acting like she owns the place. Well I feel that way for our whole country and the NAU, NATO, UN CFR and if we don't start seriously looking at how our loyalties are similar and important to the US as a whole we are going to LOSE IT.
I appreciate your refering me to interviews and statements made by your candidate, and I often do the same. The difference in your candidate and mine is voting record, professional record and basically actions that match the philosophy.
Romneys voting is very troubling to me, his business dealings with the HUMONGOUS international fincancial group Carlisle is without a doubt the most telling of his links to international and foreign policy. IMHO
This video is great. I don't know why Mitt Romney would want this video of his speach pulled. These are his positions, and they are well worth standing by. I am glad that Defending the Dream posted it.
The full CFR membership list includes thousands of people. It is not posted on their website. However, there are hundreds of members mentioned for specific reasons, whether as part of an article or because of a leadership possition, or a task force they were on, or their possition as a fellow. They offer less infomation than I would like, but they are more open than you suggest.
If you look at Mitt Romney's actual agenda I think you will find that he is not trying very hard to get on their good side. If you look at the actual CFR website you will also find that they have some good things to say about him but they also have some problems with him.
Mitt Romney has his own agenda, if it agrees with the CFR in some parts then it does, but it is his agenda, not the CFR's.
The knowyourrino website makes the claim that Mitt Romney is a CFR member or affiliate. It is not clear which one he is. The site also fails to cite its source for the claim.
I have checked out the CFR website, and done general web searches. I have never found any concrete evidence that Mitt Romney is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
I will contact the site owner for further for their references on their claim.
Romney's official membership has never been published. However, at the bottom of the knowyourrino page on the cfr, Romney's name is linked to his Foreign Affairs feature article. By writing this, he publically declares his affiliation with the CFR, and spouts their globalist views.
Before being invited to be a member, one must prove their commitment to the globalist agenda. What is this article if not such an attempt?
Show me real evidence that he is a CFR member. Mitt Romney's agenda goes in a different direction than the CFR so I don't think they are going to like him very much.
Mitt Romney has good pacing. If you listen to the whole thing he knows how to slow down to emphasize what is important, and to show the solemnity of some topics.
Where is the Ron Paul video. I don't care about these warhawks bought and sold. Rudy and Mitt are neocons in disguise. They will sell this country out!
This has been flagged as spam show
REAL RepubliCON STIMULUS:
~ CRAIG: A return foot-tapping under mens rooms stalls
~ LIMBAUGH: Blanket-free LIFE prescription for Oxy-Contin
~ W & SCARAH FAILIN: Each want 1% of Scare-Crow's Brain
~ COULTER: Get Adams Apple Removed
~ CHENEY: Keep Unilateral Contracts & Face Shootings Legal
~ NITT-WITT-MITT ROMNEY: Continue to Flip-flop on EVERY issue
~ FOLEY: Return e-mail from teen boys
~ HAGGARD: A male hooker who won't kiss & tell
GOP GOAL: To LOSE many MORE Senate & House Seats! ~S. Hannity
mavrek47 3 years ago
Ron Paul isn't leading, directing, or making a lot of the key decisions involved in his campaign. A President has to do all that. He has not been able to get Congress to work with him, and that won't change if he were to become President.
I have confidence that Mitt Romney will put country before world. In reading his book Turnaround, even in the prologue I could tell that he has the American spirit in his heart.
5M1L3 4 years ago
Mitt Romney lives the American dream and he will not let that dream be overcome by some global agenda. If I get the time I think I'll make a video about his prologue. It is inspiring.
5M1L3 4 years ago
He has nothing but empty rhetoric to offer. Talks about getting gov off your shoulders !applause! but how!?
anyusmoon1 4 years ago
I suggest you ask your candidate of choice exactly how they are going to do that. Will they spout out the ideas and then expect the next generation to actually do it for them.
Mitt Romney may not promote the grandest policies, but through simple tax cuts, and smarter spending he will lighten the burden that the government puts on the backs of its people.
5M1L3 4 years ago
I have. He hasn't and he doesn't.
True Romney doesn't have a comprehensive domestic nor foreign policy plan. His past tax voting record belies the talk now and frankly isn't sufficient to save the economic woes we are in and face in the near future. He is ill equipped to deal with economic and foreign issues.
anyusmoon1 4 years ago
Frankly Ron Paul is ill equiped to run his own campaign, let alone a country. That is why his best campaign efforts have all been done by outside sources. Yes you have all done a great job raising money and awareness of your candidate, but you don't seem to realize that you can't do his job for him once he is in office. He doesn't seem to realize it either.
5M1L3 4 years ago
I hardly think Dr. Paul needs help once he's in office he's quite, no more capable than any other candidate. Especially at guiding both sides of the aisle toward the higher aim of constitutionally sound legislation, appointments to the supreme court etc. His campaign and the funding comes from exactly where all the candidates should get their support, from we the payers, we the people- not big interests, corporations, lobbyists etc. JMHO
anyusmoon1 4 years ago
Hey Look! It's John Kerry.
Where's the 1700 people? RIGHT! There's prob 300 people there.
The people are there because they want his money.
marco114 4 years ago
If you are worried about the CFR then you need to work with others to ensure that they are impotent. I am not willing to pin my hopes for the future on one person. Or even a group. We the PEOPLE need to stand up against this North American Union. I think it merits a Constitutional Ammendment to prevent this back door approach. If we ever enter into another Union it needs to be well thought out and open.
5M1L3 4 years ago
Communism was very real when McCarthy started labeling people as Communists. However, all he did was lable them, and destroy their lives. He did not provide actual proof that they were Communist.
When you actually start providing proof, rather than just leveling charges I will accept it as more than just a witchhunt.
It is a case of the seriousness of the charge being more important than whether it is true or not.
5M1L3 4 years ago
Where's Ron Paul's speech?
midnightbright 4 years ago
Honestly, this whole CFR NWO thing is begining to take on some of the characteristics of McCarthyism. It is a bit of a witchhunt. What makes it worse is that each group seems to be conducting its own witchhunt. If it isn't CFR it might be socialist, chickenhawk, unpatriotic, anti-troop, neocon, or some other lable.
5M1L3 4 years ago
Search "bush new world order" here on you tube. In the first few videos, you see GHWB talk abou this new world order, then at the end of one Gary Hart, at a CFR meeting, tells hoe GW can use 911 to carry out his father's NWO.
freedomman12 4 years ago
5M1L3 Not at all. CFR spokespersons and written goals have stated the individual sovereign, even state sovereignty must go. They truly want a National/International entity made of our republic so as to better merge the global agenda.
anyusmoon1 4 years ago
If that is their goal then Mitt Romney is not their man. He is solid in his possition that the US remain as soverien nation.
5M1L3 4 years ago
Honestly, I don't know, Romney seems awfully chummy with the Carlyle Group. Anyway, a very important feature of just how similar you and I are. You cannot stand Canario for coming in and acting like she owns the place. Well I feel that way for our whole country and the NAU, NATO, UN CFR and if we don't start seriously looking at how our loyalties are similar and important to the US as a whole we are going to LOSE IT.
anyusmoon1 4 years ago
If you look at his interview with Glenn Beck last night he makes his possition on US sovereinty very clear.
5M1L3 4 years ago
I appreciate your refering me to interviews and statements made by your candidate, and I often do the same. The difference in your candidate and mine is voting record, professional record and basically actions that match the philosophy.
Romneys voting is very troubling to me, his business dealings with the HUMONGOUS international fincancial group Carlisle is without a doubt the most telling of his links to international and foreign policy. IMHO
anyusmoon1 4 years ago
This video is great. I don't know why Mitt Romney would want this video of his speach pulled. These are his positions, and they are well worth standing by. I am glad that Defending the Dream posted it.
5M1L3 4 years ago
The full CFR membership list includes thousands of people. It is not posted on their website. However, there are hundreds of members mentioned for specific reasons, whether as part of an article or because of a leadership possition, or a task force they were on, or their possition as a fellow. They offer less infomation than I would like, but they are more open than you suggest.
5M1L3 4 years ago
If you look at Mitt Romney's actual agenda I think you will find that he is not trying very hard to get on their good side. If you look at the actual CFR website you will also find that they have some good things to say about him but they also have some problems with him.
Mitt Romney has his own agenda, if it agrees with the CFR in some parts then it does, but it is his agenda, not the CFR's.
5M1L3 4 years ago
The knowyourrino website makes the claim that Mitt Romney is a CFR member or affiliate. It is not clear which one he is. The site also fails to cite its source for the claim.
I have checked out the CFR website, and done general web searches. I have never found any concrete evidence that Mitt Romney is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
I will contact the site owner for further for their references on their claim.
5M1L3 4 years ago
Romney's official membership has never been published. However, at the bottom of the knowyourrino page on the cfr, Romney's name is linked to his Foreign Affairs feature article. By writing this, he publically declares his affiliation with the CFR, and spouts their globalist views.
Before being invited to be a member, one must prove their commitment to the globalist agenda. What is this article if not such an attempt?
knowyourrino 4 years ago
The article was a campaign opportunity, to get political exposure.
5M1L3 4 years ago
Yes, but political exposure to what group?
knowyourrino 4 years ago
Show me real evidence that he is a CFR member. Mitt Romney's agenda goes in a different direction than the CFR so I don't think they are going to like him very much.
5M1L3 4 years ago
Mitt has the answers and will be a wonderful president.
h t t p ://nyformitt.blogspot. com/
vorosfold 4 years ago 4
I just have to add that this is a great audience.
5M1L3 4 years ago 3
Mitt Romney has good pacing. If you listen to the whole thing he knows how to slow down to emphasize what is important, and to show the solemnity of some topics.
This speach is dead on.
5M1L3 4 years ago 2
Where is the Ron Paul video. I don't care about these warhawks bought and sold. Rudy and Mitt are neocons in disguise. They will sell this country out!
turbobrain 4 years ago
As speakers, Mitt's too fast Fred's too slow and Rudy's just right
XCowboy2 4 years ago
True, but I don't digg Rudy nearly as much.
keyan99 4 years ago 3