Can that christian guy hear himself speaking? I almost feel sorry for him, but then I remember that he belives I should burn in 'hell' for 'eternity'.
Hitch was on stunning form, yet again. I only wish I could have met him.
@smithandbesson Now come on, even I know that hogwart is just kids stuff.But what isn't is your eternity!
The fact is That there is an appointed time for everyone to die,why? "For the wages of Sin is Death and after death, the Judgement". These are not my words, but from scripture, Please don't gamble on the belief/assumption that there is no God, because He has an Eternal plan for You, Me, and All, Jesus Christ!!
What a SICK TWISTED world we live. Regardless of your view "why the fuck did hitchens have to die and not this twat" is a stupid, crass, cold, evil thing to say. To wish death upon another human being, yet people will say "I'm not that bad"
Well a JUST god wouldn't send Christopher Hitchens to hell, because a just god would not allow for a hell to even exist.
Justice requires at MOST proportionate punishment to crimes. And in a truly just system, victimless crimes are not crimes at all.
Now given that Hitchens was not a criminal, whatever transgressions he'd have made would be extremely minor at most. So there would probably not be a cause for ANY real punishment by a JUST god.
This could have been a bit more intellectual. I mean you don't have to ask Hitchens all these 'what if' questions when you already know what he's going to say.
What a trip! You are going off on Friel, when he made his point with expertise. The first thing you do before you convince someone of something, is to see if he is open minded about it. So he asked: WHAT IF? H response: WHAT IF-God exists: I would hate Him. WI-God loves you: F**C that. WI-God gave you everything you have: I'd say He's an idiot and F U...etc...Thus proving for all time: Hitch HATES GOD, that's why Hitch doesn't believe. Why wast time changing the unchangeable GOD HATER.
The host doesnt want thoughtful response, just YES, or NO. This ''game'' is really his way of positioning something in favorable light. But notice when he says, got gave you health, air, to breath, etc., don't you think that means you should praise him? And hitchens says, well, does that mean that sick people suffering everyday till death should praise him?....."Lets move on to the next question."..... hahaaha typical christian
So what I get from this video is.......Todd Friel is a complete moron. Not just because of his religious views, but his responses alone and seemingly complete failure to understand almost everything Hitchens says.
answering like hitchens is so easy just hate everybody and everything is just to easy just to easy.he just whent with the flow but did not give any smart answers.
Every time a believer tries to argue with an atheist, especially one with the intelligence and wit as CH, they just put another nail in their own coffin. This guy radiated complete ignorance, stupidity and lack of knowledge, on air, in front of millions. Religion is going to wipe itself out, all we atheist have to do is sit back, watch and enjoy the show!!
So basically, if you've ever had lust or got angry with someone you should go to hell, but you'll go to heaven when you accept Jesus. So by this guy's logic, I should be a horrible criminal all my life and I just need to ask Jesus for forgiveness when I'm near death and I'll be a-ok.
@George0025 The glee you are feeling at the thought of a fellow human being in torment reaffirms my beliefs about the abysmal ethics of many Christians. Kudos on living down to my expectations so diligently.
@rrlane Isn't it amazing to see the lack of morality these people show in their display of joyfulness over the perceived eternal torment of someone else? As much as it upsets me, it also makes me happy because they are proving the exact point Hitchens spoke so eloquently for all these years- that they in fact are full of shit.
This host is unbelievable. He asks questions, clearly doesn't understand the answers he is given, then responds to his guest with whatever he decides he must have meant without having the good grace to even think about what he's being told or to listen to his guest explain himself. This guy is clearly some kind of moron. I would've signed off after about two minutes.
6:19...Hitchens is trying to point out the inconsistency and pettiness of the Ten Commandments by talking about things such as Child Abuse and Genocide...Friel responds "Have you made any graven images..." What a FUCKING IDIOT...The stupidity of Biblical Literalism defined....
@ebonyebony thats because atheists are always in contradiction and cant hang with a simple question without skirting the issue and backpeddling with A.D.D. dementia logic! LOL
well, i supose if they were real, and had any COMMON SENCE, instead of rejecting general laws of science, biology, and physics, (and didnt think they were smarter than ALBERT EINSTEIN and GOD) then the answer to your question would be YES! JUST GETS DUMBER! LORD GIVE ME STRENGTH! LOL +++
@TheAlvinealy HEY GUESS WHAT? pretty soon (sooner or later) U CAN SAY THAT DIRECTLY TO JESUS FACE! wont that be good 4 you! jajajajajajajajajajajaja +++
I'm a Christian but will confess.. this is pretty funny. But why does Hitchens only debate idiots? I would pay to see him go up against John MacArthur or Paul Washer.
@Lyra74 Because everyone pretty much looks like an idiot by comparison.
There some videos of him going against some pretty intelligent thoughtful Rabbis, but spoiler alert: they get their ass kicked too, even self-admittedly so
notice how this "super intelligent" guy dances around every single question by never giving a direct answer and answers questions with questions, NICE DIVERSION CHRIS! NEXT! LOL! TOD FRIEL IS AWESOME! HANDS DOWN! GOD BLESS TOD! +++
@jeorosales CORRECT! FAITH COMES BY HEARING! thats scripture! THEY ANSWERS COME FROM THE WORD OF GOD! if u listen to idiots like hitchens, the only answers u r going to get are grounded in absolutely NOTHING! BELIEVING IN NOTHING AND HOPE IN NOTHING! so what am am i missing out on> absolutely NOTHING!!! duh! JUST GETS DUMBER! :) +++
@hevy99 your mental disorder cease to amaze.going on without brains.i guest being beyond stupid is your style.O,one more thing.there is no god,period and jesus was a hand puppet.(now i wait).
@mysanuty u await death no doubt with ur ridiculous rhetoric and garbage u spew on every post. hatred, blasphemy, and wicked nonsense. Yep! The most reassuring thing in this world is the comfort i get in knowing that i wont be spending eternity with morons like you! You will be no doubt sucking Adolph Hitlers jock strap for all eternity or most likely something a million times worse! LMFAO! OH BROTHER! JUST GETS DUMBER! +++
@ebonyebony i think what u stated there is good example of a "hells sandwich" (which is a good idea for u to get used to. Since u have plenty comming your way in time! LOL) only u have it a little out of sequence. (atheists usually are confused, big shock! LOL so i completely understand) so FYI, u are supposed to me put the nice meat BETWEEN the two slices of bullshit! LMFAO! +++
1st Question is Easy! The answer is still no! That's saying that God has given Christopher Hitchens everything, and left the poor people to theirselves. Now, how can a God be great if he leaves others starving just to keep one person living a rich life?
Y didn't he just do a normal interview?? This "game show" thing is just stupid! Could have gotten a much better interview, todd dropped the ball on this one, sorry my oponion.
@princeofalbany Not true. I've defended these types of debates many times as I'm an adamant debater on the Internet. This is why: when we Atheists debate Theists, their gross ignorance on the topics of science shines through. They take huge leaps in logic that only the overtly religious could possibly believe. This is a great showcase for fence sitters. This is how a fence sitter becomes Atheist... by seeing the absurdity of Theists' ignorance.
@iz2sicc That assume all theists are ignorant. Granted, theisits like Friel are just into blind faith, and so would be scientificaaly ignoerant, but that doesn't mean al theists are.
@Queenofalbany I did over-generalize. I should have used the word "Creationist". However, even apologetic theists are ignorant. They depend on the God of the Gaps argument. The point is not to convince these people. It's so that fence sitters can see the argument from all sides and make a more informed decision. I'm thankful myself for all these rational thinkers as I recently threw my own Catholicism out the window. I was clinging to the very end due to an irrational fear of punishment.
"It's 'cause you were naughty, so you broke that one." Ah, thank you, sir, for that intellectual gem. Your insight is truly unparalleled. Yeah, that host is a fucking joke.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive system were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe work don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith science supports. Natural laws explain how an airplane or a cell works, but undirected natural laws cannot bring about either. Once there's a complete cell, the code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when there was no directing code.
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST prevents macro-evolution. Natural selection wouldn't preserve the evolution of new traits because they wouldn't have any survival value. A partially-evolved hand evolving from a previous trait, partially-evolved tissues, organs, biological structures would make a species unfit for survival. There are no fossils of partially-evolved species. All species of plants and animals in the fossil record are complete and fully-formed. They came into existence as complete!
NEW SPECIES: Although new species have come into existence, they don't carry any new genes. They've become new species only because they can't be crossed back with the original parent stock for various biological reasons. A biological "kind" allows for new species but not new genes. Nature has no ability to invent new genes for new traits. Only limited variations and adaptations are possible in nature, and all strictly within a biological "kind" (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.).
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
"JUNK DNA" ISN'T JUNK: Recent research shows that these segments of DNA are vital in regulating gene expression (when, where, and how genes are expressed). There's no room for random mutations to operate safely. Random mutations, from radiation, are destructive. Even for every good one there would be hundreds of harmful ones with the net effect, over time, causing harm and even extinction, not upward evolution. Genetic similarities are better explained due to a common design for common purposes.
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
HOW DOES DNA MAKE A BODY? When you divide a cake the parts are smaller than the original cake and the cake never gets bigger. When we were a cell and that cell divided, the new cells were the same size as the original cell and we got bigger. New material had to come from somewhere. That new material came from food. The sequence in our DNA directed our mother's food we received in the womb to become new cells forming all the tissues and organs of our body. Read my article: HOW DID MY DNA MAKE ME?
HUMAN EMBRYO doesn't have true gills or tail. These and other arguments have long been discarded by most evolutionists and not supported by any modern embryologist. Then, what are these structures? Read "Does The Human Embryo Go Through Animal Stages" at the Institute for Creation Research site. Briefly, what look like gills are early formation of facial and throat regions. What looks like a tail is the coccyx which grows faster than the rest of the body. The coccyx supports the pelvic muscles.
DISORDER IN THE UNIVERSE is no argument against God's existence. The disorder is because of chance and entropy, but the order can only be rationally explained due to design. If I discovered a broken watch on the ground, the disorder is no evidence that there wasn't a designer behind the watch. Please read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
BURDEN OF PROOF: Anyone who claims the level of complexity and order in life and the universe happened by chance has the burden of proof. Many atheists think they have no burden of proof because they’re not claiming the existence of something. That is not true. Atheists are claiming something. They are claiming that we are here by chance and atheists expect for everyone to accept that claim on faith because they certainly can’t prove it. Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
Todd Friel = Complete Idiot. The guy is just daft. He's just an incredibly stupid fucking person. Even though it would do absolutely no good, the guy will remain an abject idiot no mater what--he's TOTALLY stupid--he deserves a good slap in the face in any case.
@thirdimpact Well, you'd have to listen to the idiot Frielon this video to verify that what I say is true. The dipshitness displayed by him is so monumental that trying to explain it with mere words would be an injustice to his virtuosic stupidity skills. Some things are just self evident. But, goober, if you want to look up and admire this abject idiot, be my guest. And we'll all get a good laugh at your expense and move on. Ta!
Hitchens: "I know the Bible calls for slavery just as it calls for genocide."
Friel: "No, it doesn't."
Obviously Friel is a blatant liar...not mistaken....not in error....he is a blatant liar. He MUST know a large amount of the Bible yet he contradicts Hitchens' accurate comment even though he is committing a sin. Friel is the definition of a hypocrite (He is also a liar if I failed to get that across).
"...Not if it implies I'm owned by someone else...that would ruin everything for me if it were true."
This is not intellectualism, this is escapism. "I don't want it to be true therefore it cannot be so." And all the rabbit trails and refusal to even stick to the point is not Hitchens being miles ahead. It's evasion. It isn't intelligence to refuse to think a question through. It's rejection. Or to put it in context, "suppressing the truth."
@jayjaygee123 Hitch was being asked imagine hypothetical situations and describe how this would change his perspective and feeling towards god, once finding out you are a slave and saying “That would ruin everything for me if it were true." Is a perfectly valid intellectual answer
This is pathetic, how he equate being angry with someone the same as murder and for that you god would condemn you to an eternity in hell, which is eternal suffering. I can't believe so many people follow this kind of religion.
You can tell through the whole interview Hitchens was just dying to let loose with his hatred and vitriol towards Christians and the host wouldn't let him. Hitchens kept trying to change the subject to no avail. Hitchens FAIL.
@YesYou123333 he wasn't trying to change the subject. The host simply can't grasp the thought that people can have different thoughts. Hitchens answered every answer perfectly
@YesYou123333 Hitchens didn't change the subject once. Just like Friel, he gave an answer you don't agree with. An answer that doesn't back up the supernatural being you for some bizarre reason belive in.
@spmcd2011 Christians "bizarre"? Atheists believe we came from a rock!!! And, you guys laugh at a talking snake? Yet, believe by some magical cause we came from a rock? Think about it. According to atheists, theoretically, one could leave a laptop on the beach and over the span of millions and millions of years it would turn into a human!!! Us bizarre?
Can that christian guy hear himself speaking? I almost feel sorry for him, but then I remember that he belives I should burn in 'hell' for 'eternity'.
Hitch was on stunning form, yet again. I only wish I could have met him.
AnnaGoesToThePark 12 hours ago
"in fine book stores everywhere"
cygnusx555 17 hours ago
The host obviously didn't read his book, and i hate his condescending "sir" all the time.
UltimateTomato 1 day ago
now that Hitchens has gone we must take his place to rail against the absurdity of religion until OUR last breath.
smithandbesson 4 days ago 2
@smithandbesson Yes friend,and the only thing keeping you out of hell is your your next breath! so make sure you keep breathing!
oscar45515 3 days ago
@oscar45515 you might as well tell me i`m going to Hogwarts when i die...it`s actually a little more credible :)
smithandbesson 3 days ago
@smithandbesson Now come on, even I know that hogwart is just kids stuff.But what isn't is your eternity!
The fact is That there is an appointed time for everyone to die,why? "For the wages of Sin is Death and after death, the Judgement". These are not my words, but from scripture, Please don't gamble on the belief/assumption that there is no God, because He has an Eternal plan for You, Me, and All, Jesus Christ!!
oscar45515 3 days ago
@oscar45515 NO.`HE` DOES NOT EXIST. :(
smithandbesson 3 days ago
"None of your f****** business." We love you Hitch.
wetheatheists 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What a SICK TWISTED world we live. Regardless of your view "why the fuck did hitchens have to die and not this twat" is a stupid, crass, cold, evil thing to say. To wish death upon another human being, yet people will say "I'm not that bad"
Atonecc 5 days ago
Well a JUST god wouldn't send Christopher Hitchens to hell, because a just god would not allow for a hell to even exist.
Justice requires at MOST proportionate punishment to crimes. And in a truly just system, victimless crimes are not crimes at all.
Now given that Hitchens was not a criminal, whatever transgressions he'd have made would be extremely minor at most. So there would probably not be a cause for ANY real punishment by a JUST god.
Just the christian god is neither just or good.
TheSkunkCat 5 days ago
why the hell would Hitchens agree to go on this retarded show?
mikeyanagita1 6 days ago
This is what happens when intelligence meets stupidity.
Gintonious 6 days ago
This could have been a bit more intellectual. I mean you don't have to ask Hitchens all these 'what if' questions when you already know what he's going to say.
MrCharrrles 1 week ago
I think Hitch really just called in here to have some fun :)
Chris197980CH 2 weeks ago
What a trip! You are going off on Friel, when he made his point with expertise. The first thing you do before you convince someone of something, is to see if he is open minded about it. So he asked: WHAT IF? H response: WHAT IF-God exists: I would hate Him. WI-God loves you: F**C that. WI-God gave you everything you have: I'd say He's an idiot and F U...etc...Thus proving for all time: Hitch HATES GOD, that's why Hitch doesn't believe. Why wast time changing the unchangeable GOD HATER.
turnforward 2 weeks ago
O M G! what a total, delusional FOOL this friel guy is.
theID2 2 weeks ago
Fuck, this reminds me of how much Hitch owned. Guy used words like a ninja uses shurikens.
WizardJim 2 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
why the fuck did hitchens have to die and not this twat....
inconsp1cuous1515 2 weeks ago
Quo warranto Hitch! Quo warranto! :-)
qtutoringhelps 2 weeks ago
The host doesnt want thoughtful response, just YES, or NO. This ''game'' is really his way of positioning something in favorable light. But notice when he says, got gave you health, air, to breath, etc., don't you think that means you should praise him? And hitchens says, well, does that mean that sick people suffering everyday till death should praise him?....."Lets move on to the next question."..... hahaaha typical christian
Johnf85 2 weeks ago 3
So what I get from this video is.......Todd Friel is a complete moron. Not just because of his religious views, but his responses alone and seemingly complete failure to understand almost everything Hitchens says.
zpt4xzpt4x 3 weeks ago
Hitchens sounds like a Starcraft character when he says «sounds right» in the beginning. That's how badass he is.
Clorwall 3 weeks ago
answering like hitchens is so easy just hate everybody and everything is just to easy just to easy.he just whent with the flow but did not give any smart answers.
SuperBIBLEFREAK 3 weeks ago
@SuperBIBLEFREAK
did he get asked any smart questions?
acouragefann 2 weeks ago
"who gives a shit." LMFAO!
I love how Hitch is playing Friel's (mind-numbingly stupid) little game!
nowgleaning 3 weeks ago
Now THIS is Hitch-slapping in the extreme!!! I think it's one of the best examples of Hitch slapping the crap out of someone!
drstrangelove09 3 weeks ago
"The game is called 'What If?', essentially I ask you the same question over and over again until I hear what I want to hear, sound good?"
benfclark 3 weeks ago 5
Dude. Hitchens is such a fuckin badass is this interview.
SirDruhHu 3 weeks ago 5
friel took a knife to a gun fight
lafontaine13 3 weeks ago 3
Every time a believer tries to argue with an atheist, especially one with the intelligence and wit as CH, they just put another nail in their own coffin. This guy radiated complete ignorance, stupidity and lack of knowledge, on air, in front of millions. Religion is going to wipe itself out, all we atheist have to do is sit back, watch and enjoy the show!!
larryboyhere 4 weeks ago
So basically, if you've ever had lust or got angry with someone you should go to hell, but you'll go to heaven when you accept Jesus. So by this guy's logic, I should be a horrible criminal all my life and I just need to ask Jesus for forgiveness when I'm near death and I'll be a-ok.
trolltastic123 1 month ago
lol this host is a joke, hitchens owned his ass, and notice how he never answered the Hitch when Hitchens asked questions too
youngsplash85 1 month ago
What an appropriately named radio show. The host was truly wretched.
MrMightymorphosis 1 month ago
i lmao @ "none of your fucking business" every goddamned time
fuckisnotadirtyword 1 month ago 3
Comment removed
83Tubes 1 month ago
You can hear halfway through the first response the host realizes he's in way over his head. Maintains his radio-cool though, so well-done there.
ytrexm 1 month ago
Game set and match for Hitch
Foesmaster 1 month ago 3
Friel was completely clueless while he was being totally owned by Hitchens.
LagunaSlick 1 month ago
i was trying to think of the funniest interview ive heard involving Hitchens, i think this might be it. RIP
TheIkaraCult 1 month ago 3
@TheIkaraCult No it's R.I.H. rest in hell and that why hes doing the Disco Inferno burn baby, baby burn.
George0025 1 month ago in playlist Interview
@George0025 The glee you are feeling at the thought of a fellow human being in torment reaffirms my beliefs about the abysmal ethics of many Christians. Kudos on living down to my expectations so diligently.
rrlane 1 month ago 3
@rrlane Isn't it amazing to see the lack of morality these people show in their display of joyfulness over the perceived eternal torment of someone else? As much as it upsets me, it also makes me happy because they are proving the exact point Hitchens spoke so eloquently for all these years- that they in fact are full of shit.
SinceretheGhost 1 month ago
This host is unbelievable. He asks questions, clearly doesn't understand the answers he is given, then responds to his guest with whatever he decides he must have meant without having the good grace to even think about what he's being told or to listen to his guest explain himself. This guy is clearly some kind of moron. I would've signed off after about two minutes.
Afghamistam 1 month ago 29
Christopher Hitchens is with God in Heaven, now.
jonmichaeljonmichael 1 month ago
@jonmichaeljonmichael Sadly he is not, as there is no god.
itchygonads 1 month ago in playlist Christopher Hitchens 2
Hitch 1 - Christian Moron 0
adamsbeer 1 month ago 6
@adamsbeer and Hitchens just added one more to population of hell. He is also doing to the Disco Inferno Burn Baby Burn.
George0025 1 month ago
@George0025 Me 1 - Christian moron George 0
adamsbeer 1 month ago
Christopher was probably drunk off his ass ... but he STILL intellectually bitch-slapped Todd.
auroraman56 1 month ago 3
6:19...Hitchens is trying to point out the inconsistency and pettiness of the Ten Commandments by talking about things such as Child Abuse and Genocide...Friel responds "Have you made any graven images..." What a FUCKING IDIOT...The stupidity of Biblical Literalism defined....
ebonyebony 1 month ago
@ebonyebony thats because atheists are always in contradiction and cant hang with a simple question without skirting the issue and backpeddling with A.D.D. dementia logic! LOL
hevy99 1 month ago
hitchens is great...
virgilxoxo1 1 month ago
Hitchs response at 2.20 is fucking amazing, lightning intelligence.
shawndimery 1 month ago
"Who gives a shit?"
Hahahaha. Even when Hitchens is being vulgar and straightforward he sounds intelligent
zzyzx0788 1 month ago
well, i supose if they were real, and had any COMMON SENCE, instead of rejecting general laws of science, biology, and physics, (and didnt think they were smarter than ALBERT EINSTEIN and GOD) then the answer to your question would be YES! JUST GETS DUMBER! LORD GIVE ME STRENGTH! LOL +++
hevy99 1 month ago
A masterful ass-kicking dished out by Hitchens.
curonevans 1 month ago
FUCK GOD
TheAlvinealy 1 month ago
@TheAlvinealy HEY GUESS WHAT? pretty soon (sooner or later) U CAN SAY THAT DIRECTLY TO JESUS FACE! wont that be good 4 you! jajajajajajajajajajajaja +++
hevy99 1 month ago
@hevy99 Will the Easter Bunny and Santa be there with him too?
TheAlvinealy 1 month ago
Is this the "Asshole Clown Show"?
charlesvan13 1 month ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
awwwwwwww yea how silly of me! calling the man on his bullshit he writes books about JUST ISNT FAIR huh. WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! :D +++
hevy99 1 month ago
I'm a Christian but will confess.. this is pretty funny. But why does Hitchens only debate idiots? I would pay to see him go up against John MacArthur or Paul Washer.
Lyra74 2 months ago
@Lyra74 Because everyone pretty much looks like an idiot by comparison.
There some videos of him going against some pretty intelligent thoughtful Rabbis, but spoiler alert: they get their ass kicked too, even self-admittedly so
zzyzx0788 1 month ago
Comment removed
Lyra74 2 months ago
notice how this "super intelligent" guy dances around every single question by never giving a direct answer and answers questions with questions, NICE DIVERSION CHRIS! NEXT! LOL! TOD FRIEL IS AWESOME! HANDS DOWN! GOD BLESS TOD! +++
hevy99 2 months ago
@hevy99 actually you just have to pay more attention and you'll hear all the answers!
jeorosales 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jeorosales CORRECT! FAITH COMES BY HEARING! thats scripture! THEY ANSWERS COME FROM THE WORD OF GOD! if u listen to idiots like hitchens, the only answers u r going to get are grounded in absolutely NOTHING! BELIEVING IN NOTHING AND HOPE IN NOTHING! so what am am i missing out on> absolutely NOTHING!!! duh! JUST GETS DUMBER! :) +++
hevy99 2 months ago
@hevy99 Probably because they are all loaded questions that are stupid and leading in premise. Dummy.
SupremeChimp 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SupremeChimp maybe u evolved from a Chimpanzee but im thoroughly convinced I DID NOT! jajajajajajajajajajaja+++
hevy99 1 month ago
@hevy99 your mental disorder cease to amaze.going on without brains.i guest being beyond stupid is your style.O,one more thing.there is no god,period and jesus was a hand puppet.(now i wait).
mysanuty 1 month ago
@mysanuty u await death no doubt with ur ridiculous rhetoric and garbage u spew on every post. hatred, blasphemy, and wicked nonsense. Yep! The most reassuring thing in this world is the comfort i get in knowing that i wont be spending eternity with morons like you! You will be no doubt sucking Adolph Hitlers jock strap for all eternity or most likely something a million times worse! LMFAO! OH BROTHER! JUST GETS DUMBER! +++
hevy99 1 month ago
@hevy99 Spoken like a true bigoted Idiot...Fuck you Sir
ebonyebony 1 month ago 2
@ebonyebony i think what u stated there is good example of a "hells sandwich" (which is a good idea for u to get used to. Since u have plenty comming your way in time! LOL) only u have it a little out of sequence. (atheists usually are confused, big shock! LOL so i completely understand) so FYI, u are supposed to me put the nice meat BETWEEN the two slices of bullshit! LMFAO! +++
hevy99 1 month ago
1st Question is Easy! The answer is still no! That's saying that God has given Christopher Hitchens everything, and left the poor people to theirselves. Now, how can a God be great if he leaves others starving just to keep one person living a rich life?
MrTwistedHawk 2 months ago
Y didn't he just do a normal interview?? This "game show" thing is just stupid! Could have gotten a much better interview, todd dropped the ball on this one, sorry my oponion.
MrJsh01 2 months ago
i want to punch tod right in his fucking face
oliverlovesgorts 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ 5:57 not "Kosher" ?
SpeakaDaEnglish 2 months ago
Comment removed
SpeakaDaEnglish 2 months ago
lol Todd got raped
VitalSigns1 2 months ago 23
@VitalSigns1 Which isn't against the ten commandments btw.
AaronJMcCormick 1 month ago
There is no point in a theist arguing with an atheist, it gets nowhere.
princeofalbany 2 months ago
@princeofalbany Not true. I've defended these types of debates many times as I'm an adamant debater on the Internet. This is why: when we Atheists debate Theists, their gross ignorance on the topics of science shines through. They take huge leaps in logic that only the overtly religious could possibly believe. This is a great showcase for fence sitters. This is how a fence sitter becomes Atheist... by seeing the absurdity of Theists' ignorance.
iz2sicc 2 months ago in playlist Atheism debates
@iz2sicc That assume all theists are ignorant. Granted, theisits like Friel are just into blind faith, and so would be scientificaaly ignoerant, but that doesn't mean al theists are.
Queenofalbany 2 months ago
@Queenofalbany I did over-generalize. I should have used the word "Creationist". However, even apologetic theists are ignorant. They depend on the God of the Gaps argument. The point is not to convince these people. It's so that fence sitters can see the argument from all sides and make a more informed decision. I'm thankful myself for all these rational thinkers as I recently threw my own Catholicism out the window. I was clinging to the very end due to an irrational fear of punishment.
iz2sicc 2 months ago
You just knew this DJ Twat would look like that! What a complete Numpty!
dilwich123 2 months ago 2
wow hitchens is failing
TheLostCuber 2 months ago
Funny how Hitchens' pic is frowning and negative-looking, but Friel is all smiley and happy. lol
justin27mcintyre 2 months ago
Hitchens - one of those few people who remind me that it's ok to be English after all :-)
whyteay 2 months ago 2
8:50
"none of your fucking business"
"alrighty"
you can actually hear Hitch sighing after that :D
jaylias 2 months ago
Friel always his this super dishonest smile on his face, I'm surprised he's not a fucking Scientologist! Lol
MrBakura91 2 months ago
Friel: U mad bro?
DannyIgnite 3 months ago
I dont believe in those commandments. Never have tried - Hitchens
So you've pretty much kept the 10 commandments. - Friel What???
Friel is fucking deaf.
pokergeekaa 3 months ago
What if... I'm a credulous sanctimonious twit without a smidgeon of intellectual honesty?
rrpostalagain 3 months ago in playlist Christopher Hitchens
Hitchens' "yeah" at the very beginning already seems to suggest he's less than impressed before they even get started.
johnjsal 3 months ago
I hope he sold some books after this interview, they are all over fine book stores. If not, it was a total waste of his time
Evolvedprimate 3 months ago
"It's 'cause you were naughty, so you broke that one." Ah, thank you, sir, for that intellectual gem. Your insight is truly unparalleled. Yeah, that host is a fucking joke.
MathaelTheDestroyer 3 months ago
'Thou shalt not covet thy neighbours ass'
Or, as Hitchens demonstrates: 'Thou shalt simply hand it to him'.
papillon7 3 months ago
Seems like that Hitchens guys owned Todd in this discussion.
ARSONPINNACLE 3 months ago in playlist Todd Friel interviews Christopher Hitchens
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive system were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe work don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith science supports. Natural laws explain how an airplane or a cell works, but undirected natural laws cannot bring about either. Once there's a complete cell, the code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when there was no directing code.
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 3 months ago
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST prevents macro-evolution. Natural selection wouldn't preserve the evolution of new traits because they wouldn't have any survival value. A partially-evolved hand evolving from a previous trait, partially-evolved tissues, organs, biological structures would make a species unfit for survival. There are no fossils of partially-evolved species. All species of plants and animals in the fossil record are complete and fully-formed. They came into existence as complete!
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW SPECIES: Although new species have come into existence, they don't carry any new genes. They've become new species only because they can't be crossed back with the original parent stock for various biological reasons. A biological "kind" allows for new species but not new genes. Nature has no ability to invent new genes for new traits. Only limited variations and adaptations are possible in nature, and all strictly within a biological "kind" (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.).
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 3 months ago
"JUNK DNA" ISN'T JUNK: Recent research shows that these segments of DNA are vital in regulating gene expression (when, where, and how genes are expressed). There's no room for random mutations to operate safely. Random mutations, from radiation, are destructive. Even for every good one there would be hundreds of harmful ones with the net effect, over time, causing harm and even extinction, not upward evolution. Genetic similarities are better explained due to a common design for common purposes.
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
Mogley52 3 months ago
HOW DOES DNA MAKE A BODY? When you divide a cake the parts are smaller than the original cake and the cake never gets bigger. When we were a cell and that cell divided, the new cells were the same size as the original cell and we got bigger. New material had to come from somewhere. That new material came from food. The sequence in our DNA directed our mother's food we received in the womb to become new cells forming all the tissues and organs of our body. Read my article: HOW DID MY DNA MAKE ME?
Mogley52 3 months ago
HUMAN EMBRYO doesn't have true gills or tail. These and other arguments have long been discarded by most evolutionists and not supported by any modern embryologist. Then, what are these structures? Read "Does The Human Embryo Go Through Animal Stages" at the Institute for Creation Research site. Briefly, what look like gills are early formation of facial and throat regions. What looks like a tail is the coccyx which grows faster than the rest of the body. The coccyx supports the pelvic muscles.
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DISORDER IN THE UNIVERSE is no argument against God's existence. The disorder is because of chance and entropy, but the order can only be rationally explained due to design. If I discovered a broken watch on the ground, the disorder is no evidence that there wasn't a designer behind the watch. Please read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BURDEN OF PROOF: Anyone who claims the level of complexity and order in life and the universe happened by chance has the burden of proof. Many atheists think they have no burden of proof because they’re not claiming the existence of something. That is not true. Atheists are claiming something. They are claiming that we are here by chance and atheists expect for everyone to accept that claim on faith because they certainly can’t prove it. Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
Murder in your heart is murder? WTF? I should be doing life without parole.
rubberbaby00 3 months ago
Is Todd Friel mentally handicapped or something?
HeilLoki 3 months ago
none of your fucking business. BOOM
JagjeetMann 3 months ago 18
This has been flagged as spam show
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 4 months ago
I was really hoping Christopher to end with "Sir, If a God existed, I believe I'd already be in hell".
someonetoogoodforyou 4 months ago
"...remember... we are playing the game What If.." Please stfu
JoshFaille 4 months ago
Todd Friel = Complete Idiot. The guy is just daft. He's just an incredibly stupid fucking person. Even though it would do absolutely no good, the guy will remain an abject idiot no mater what--he's TOTALLY stupid--he deserves a good slap in the face in any case.
kurd55 4 months ago
@kurd55 Well spoken. "He's stupid. And his face. And his butt. And he's dumb" "Why?" "Because!"
thirdimpact 3 months ago
@thirdimpact Well, you'd have to listen to the idiot Frielon this video to verify that what I say is true. The dipshitness displayed by him is so monumental that trying to explain it with mere words would be an injustice to his virtuosic stupidity skills. Some things are just self evident. But, goober, if you want to look up and admire this abject idiot, be my guest. And we'll all get a good laugh at your expense and move on. Ta!
kurd55 3 months ago
@kurd55 Go on?
thirdimpact 3 months ago
@thirdimpact That's all your worth, and I'm a generous person.
kurd55 3 months ago
@kurd55 Hmmm... I was expecting more profanity.
thirdimpact 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thirdimpact Hmmm... I was expecting more profanity.
kurd55 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
None of your fucking business :)
Somai82 4 months ago
This is the result of the last few years of media saturation of the idea that even stupid people have valid ideas.
lumpheadthump 4 months ago
Friel is so completely out of his league here it's embarrassing.
ancalites 4 months ago 2
Hitchens: "I know the Bible calls for slavery just as it calls for genocide."
Friel: "No, it doesn't."
Obviously Friel is a blatant liar...not mistaken....not in error....he is a blatant liar. He MUST know a large amount of the Bible yet he contradicts Hitchens' accurate comment even though he is committing a sin. Friel is the definition of a hypocrite (He is also a liar if I failed to get that across).
CynicalSkeptic1 4 months ago in playlist More videos from plus2piK
Sounds like Glenn Beck.
ninjaking333 4 months ago
When Todd was aksing if he ever took "the Lords name in vain". I woulda loved to of heard hitchens say "Oh God Yes".
Damien3210 4 months ago
Friel hasn't read his bible at all.
Thou shalt not lie. oops ... he already did.
artwdog 4 months ago
What a pussy of a radio guy....does anybody actually listen to this shit regularly?
bermudaguy1 4 months ago
This guy is so fucking annoying, I only listened for Hitch but seriously...this fucking guy...just die.
Mwilson1066 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When is this Marxian nitwit going to crap out? C'mon already, CROAK!!!
TheManWithTVEyes 4 months ago
"Who gives a s%#*?" lmao
CataneseJr 5 months ago
What an intellectual mismatch!
nicksum29 5 months ago 2
Are you a good person? See "God's Prison" to find out.
Electfilmproductions 5 months ago
4:16-26 cuts right to the heart of the matter.
"...Not if it implies I'm owned by someone else...that would ruin everything for me if it were true."
This is not intellectualism, this is escapism. "I don't want it to be true therefore it cannot be so." And all the rabbit trails and refusal to even stick to the point is not Hitchens being miles ahead. It's evasion. It isn't intelligence to refuse to think a question through. It's rejection. Or to put it in context, "suppressing the truth."
jayjaygee123 5 months ago
@jayjaygee123 Hitch was being asked imagine hypothetical situations and describe how this would change his perspective and feeling towards god, once finding out you are a slave and saying “That would ruin everything for me if it were true." Is a perfectly valid intellectual answer
MrSnufkin86 4 months ago
Comment removed
jayjaygee123 5 months ago
… it's like a 3 year old debating Michio Kaku on string theory!
macmarine 5 months ago
@macmarine LOL! - fair point, though I would say Hitchens was more like 2 years old, than 3!
You and I think the same, brother. God bless you.
FunnyLittleChap 5 months ago
Are you good enough to make it to heaven? See "God's Prison" and find out.
Electfilmproductions 5 months ago
Poor Todd Friel. Clueless. Absolutely clueless.
maril99 5 months ago
8:52 The most AWESOME response!
"none of your F-ing business."
DoYouKnowPascal 5 months ago
WOW i feel so sorry for all of you who shows no faith.
underglow59 5 months ago
@underglow59
Faith, by definition is "how much can you be convinced to believe without evidence?" This is an overrated virtue.
dblacky1977 5 months ago
@dblacky1977 Why is it that you believe that its overrated?
underglow59 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@underglow59
Claims without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
dblacky1977 5 months ago
@underglow59 Why do you hold faith in high order. Faith is a pathway to ignorance not evidence.
spmcd2011 4 months ago 2
"Non of ur "beep" business" sounds much more harsh than "Non of your fucking business".
marcetclaude 5 months ago
Friel got rolled and he didn't even know it. That always gives me the best laugh.
averylbrooks 5 months ago
Reason and Logic 1, superstitions 0.
bcarr424 5 months ago
This is pathetic, how he equate being angry with someone the same as murder and for that you god would condemn you to an eternity in hell, which is eternal suffering. I can't believe so many people follow this kind of religion.
rbourdillon 5 months ago
You can tell through the whole interview Hitchens was just dying to let loose with his hatred and vitriol towards Christians and the host wouldn't let him. Hitchens kept trying to change the subject to no avail. Hitchens FAIL.
YesYou123333 5 months ago
@YesYou123333 he wasn't trying to change the subject. The host simply can't grasp the thought that people can have different thoughts. Hitchens answered every answer perfectly
wHisperis001 5 months ago
@YesYou123333 Hitchens didn't change the subject once. Just like Friel, he gave an answer you don't agree with. An answer that doesn't back up the supernatural being you for some bizarre reason belive in.
spmcd2011 5 months ago
@spmcd2011 Christians "bizarre"? Atheists believe we came from a rock!!! And, you guys laugh at a talking snake? Yet, believe by some magical cause we came from a rock? Think about it. According to atheists, theoretically, one could leave a laptop on the beach and over the span of millions and millions of years it would turn into a human!!! Us bizarre?
YesYou123333 5 months ago
@YesYou123333 Name one atheists who thinks we came from rock? All you have proven is that you no nothing about abiogenisis and evolution.
spmcd2001 5 months ago