have you served on a board with an unrepentant domestic terrorist who on September 11th 2001 said "I don't regret setting bombs,'' Bill Ayers said. ''I feel we didn't do enough.''
um...Obama held a fundraiser at Ayers house. There IS a connection. What that really means has yet to be discovered, but unless this is an old video that needs removed due to evidence being out, then I think you need to educate yourself.
Hey Stanley........Do you live in the same neighborhood as Ayers, Khalid and Rezko?
Do you know what the difference in Adolph Hitlers rise to power and becoming Chancelor of Germany and Obama becoming the president of the U.S.? .............75 Years.
Your logic sucks. Living in the same city isn't what connects Obama and Ayers. Them being FRIENDS is what connects them. The Weathermen killed innocent people and planned to kill over 25 million Americans should they have come to power. They also expected to receive assistance from Cuba, the USSR and North Vietnam in the form of these countries assisting the occupation of America. The fact that Obama would associate with a murdering bastard like Ayers is repulsive. Thus Zennie, you're a tool.
This guy is a dope. "The Communist Manifesto was written 113 years before I was born! Therefore, I cannot be a Communist, even if I hang out with Communists and support their goals."
If you vote for a candidate solely on the basis of their race, that makes you a RACIST!!! There, I just blew your fucking mind.
your "funny voices" and trying to bring black people of the Chicago area of the 60s into this debate simply shows off how weak the Obama argument is in regards to his connections to a known and proud terrorist.
What strikes me as sad is that after Ayers interview in 01 where he stated he wished he would have done more (damage)Obama is still friends with this "American terrorist." Seems to me he just has too many bad connections. I am still trying to figure out how blending in w/ the rest of your Dem. party and always voting what they vote = change. Maybe someone can help me on that. Not a stand out at all, just the same as the majority. Tax cuts so every1 can pay Fred/Fannie! = more money 4 Obama!
typical ignorant democratic americans blaming everything on bush. You know there is a congress right? even though bush had some bad ideas most of the congress backed him. Besides, that comment was completely off subject anyway...zennie is an idiot
Why don't you use your brain, open your mind and read the information.
Are you nuts? Yes, you are blinded by his holiness, Obamalamadingdong.
If you were truly honest with yourself, you know given all of the history and facts behind the rise of the ONE were attributed to any other candidate, you guys would be having a cow.
If you listen you'd know that Obama's connection goes beyond serving on the same committee. Obama's announcement that he was a state senate candidate was made in William Ayers LIVINGROOM!
How can you even comment when YOU say you've never heard of the weather underground before?
So the fact that Barack "My Muslim Faith" Hussein Obama raises private money makes him less far left? LOL And you question Kurtz's logic?
The CLOSE ties between Hussein Obama with Ayers, and the "God d--- America" church is good evidence that Obama is not what he tries to paint himself as.
We would better of with Clinton (any of them). Thank God, many Hillary suporters will vote McCain. Whew!
THis video is still up, even after the mean proposition has been found false? Kurtz is not trying to tie Hussein Obama with the Weatherman. He is tying Bill Ayers with Obama, something that Obama doesn't seem to want! (I wonder why)
Obama said that Bill was just a guy who lives close by. Turns out he and unrepented terrorrist worked together for over 3 years, in Chicago.
Why did Obama lie, and made it apear as if Bill was just a nobody in his life, when both worked together?
Zennie you are so funny! The fact that the bombing happened when Obama was a kid is what makes it worse. The fact that Obama knew about this "before" he decided to associate with a terrorist like Ayers is what makes him look so bad.
You see if the bombing happened "after" Obama was on the board with Ayers, it would make Obama look better. Then he could say that he did not know how dangerous Ayers really was.
Zennie62, Obama DID say is is for free trade and he DOES take both sides of every issue. Here's proof. Search for the youtube video called
"Obama Trading in Contradictions"
Watch is and then tell me what you think.
I don't know where Obama really stands on anything because he says whatever he thinks people want to hear. I do however know what his actions say about him. 20 yrs of Rev Wright.
zennie62, There is a BIG difference between guilt BY association and guilt OF association. If Obama just happened to know someone who is a racist and we tried to pin that on him that's guilt BY association. On the other hand if he is a MEMBER of a racist church for 20 yrs then he is guilty OF his associations. Big difference.
"You can report eveyrthing you know about McCain and his "ties with terrorrism". That's called "free press"." <-- DId you read that part? If you know about McCain's unions with american-haters, by all means, report it.
Remember that it doesn't change the fact that Obama is surrounded by america haters
Obama claims to be in favor of "change", however it seems that he brings nothing new. Just far-left mentality, typical of Ayers and reverend "G-d da-- the USA" Wright. Doesn't te fact that Obama has such friends puts a question mark on his allegations? What else will we discover about him, if he gets elected? The man is a mistake. Don't vote for him.
Saying that you are ilogical is like saying that your maths calculation is wrong. If you say that X is the same as Y, I call you ilogical. It is not an "insult".
You can report eveyrthing you know about McCain and his "ties with terrorrism". That's called "free press". What you cannot do is try to divert attention from the fact that Bill Ayers, the anti-american terrorrist, worked close by with Hussein Obama for some considerable time. That link is one that you can't erase.
Watching these youtube video put together by people that haven't a clue about what they are talking about is making me crazy. Nowhere does Kurtz try to tie Obama to the Weathermen. Let's try being honest in your smear tactics.
Of course it's fair and you'd have to explain what that "some way" was and the degree of "help".
But you're getting off the subject of Obama's ties to an unrepentant terrorists who is currently nowhere to be found. Obama is simply saying "This is divisive" and the "I was 8 argument" is ridiculous, not to mention amateurish.
Obama has an issue with embarrassing associations. Reverend Wright was a big one, is Ayers going to be even worse?
Kurtz isn't "trying to tie" there is a tie between the two.
Obama's political career began with a fundraiser in Ayers' home. This was in the 90's. Did you serve on a board with Ayers? Did Ayers support your candidacy for the senate? Did Ayers mentor your political career in Chicago?
Zennie, you are illogical. Kurtz is not saying that Obama is a terrorrist like Ayers. Stanley is saying that Obama had close ties with Ayers IN THE 90s, NOT in the 60s. NOw, you may not like that your candidate feels confortable working with anti-american terrorrists,but most americans might not like that.
Don't try to put words in Kurtz's mouth. Heis not linking Obama with terrorrism. He is linking Hussein Obama with Ayers. Deal with that.
That's right. Ayers, and Reverend "G-D da-- America" Wright are closely tied with Hussein Obama, and that is a fact. Zennnie is trying to divert attention with no sucess.
I hope Hussein Obama gets the boot out. Americans don't need a far left, lying, anti-american, good for nothing wannabe president like Husssein OBama.
You've ignored the point with some kind of red herring about being 8 years old in the '60's. What Kurtz is actually showing is that while Obama wants to NOW portray himself as a centrist to garner more votes, he in fact is VERY leftist in his philosophies, as proved by his associations with black racists and radicals. I just want to know who this guy is on the presidential ballot.
talk about the charges being made, not just make fun. Didn't Bill Ayres help start Obama's political career? If there is no connection, why the cover-up?
there's nothing to explain away. Ayers AFTER BOASTING was cleared to work on FEDERAL PROPERTY at the university of Illinois there's nothing you can or need to do about it except list your candidates creditials. My candidate has already shown that he is in touch with people LOL
I can't say I agree with either party. Neither party has done crap to secure our borders, Neither party has done crap to prevent our industries from moving over seas. Neither party has done crap to make energy affordable but given the choice between bad and worse (which is the choice we have) I'll NEVER vote for that honky hating 6B6M6.
In fact this will be the first time I have found a reason to vote. NO-BAMA
Hannity makes some good points but Lou Dobbs would be my first choice for president.
I considered Obama until he endorsed free trade. He lost my vote there. He has taken both sides of every issue. He'll say anything.
After Rev Wright I'll vote for ANYBODY but Obama. Ok issues. The war is over we won. Health insurance drives up Dr. prices. Outlaw ALL insurance and prices will fall to affordable market levels. It increases demand 4 services. A recent scratch cost me $400. Would I have paid without insurance? NO I would have stayed home but yes I did pay through premiums. Get it?
They weren't "accused of allegedly bombing", they proudly boasted of it, and Ayers said he is "guilty as sin, free as a bird, it's a great country" and he wished he'd done more.
The issue is not that Obama was in Chicago in the 60s, because he WASN'T. The issue is that they are friends, Obama considers Ayers to be "respectable" and "mainstream", and describes his relationship with Ayers as "friendly". And they've appeared together at several speaking engagements arranged by Michelle Obama.
Nevermind that America's working class has the highest standard of living in the world. We have more toys, better food, better roads, better entertainment and burn more oil driving around in our SUVs, jet skis, boats and RVs than any other country. Yet that's not good enough for this mass of disgruntled voters who are so riddled with class envy that they are on the brink of electing an economicaly ignorant socialist who would most likely send this country into the next great depression!
pyro,some OPEC countries have a higher per capita income than we do.They also provide their citizens with free college and healthcare. Now before you tell me to go move there since they have it so good,know that I'm just stating facts.
This is not about class envy,it's about redistributing the wealth.You people on the right are fine with a shift to the top because you tend to be authoritarians.
But God forbid if the working class demands better wages and benefits,that's a handout.
And lastly,blastingcaps says it takes time for the wealth to trickle down. Ok, Reagan started the "VooDOO" 25 years ago, look at the mess we're in now.
WalMart type jobs,record home forclosure,record deficits and debts,record bankruptcies,rising college costs, but the top 10% are doing quite well.
Limbaugh and his ilk say,"Well get a better job,pull yourself up by the bootstraps"
Tell that crap to Bush and McCain,how'd they get rich?
You guys need to stop giving presidents credit/blame for economic trends that are beyond their control. Clinton had nothing to do with the internet boom that kept the good times rolling during his term, just like Bush had nothing to do with its inevitable collapse, or 911, or oil speculation, or lenders making risky loans under the assumption that real estate values would always go up. Sh!t happens. The prez is usually just along for the ride with little control over complex economic trends.
Come on pyro,do you know about Cheney's energy meeting? Have you heard about Ken Lay,Phil Gramm and Enron? How about Tom DeLay,Jack Abramoff and the Marianas.
Do you know why the finacial markets are being manipulated?Do you understand that deregulation means no oversight?
Why do you think they want to privatize everything.
Government employees still get a pension,why did Reagan implement 401K?
All of this is about greed and concentrating the wealth in the hands of the very few.
Weatherman or no weatherman. We KNOW Obama was in that whitey hating church for 20 yrs and we KNOW Obama tells 7 year old girls America isn't the country it once was or could be. And we know Michelle wasn't proud of her country and we know Obama snears down his elitist nose at the poor dumb working man clinging to his guns and religion and that's enough for me to say F Borak Insane 6B6M6 anti-christ. And you are voting for him why? You hate whitey too?????????
jbive, No I guess you don't get it. My point is private insurance drives up prices. Bad. Government health care would do that too but even worse because it would limit your choices.
Like the long lines at the DMV? That's what you would get with government health care and no place else to turn. Plus there is no such thing as free. You pay in higher taxes. But you think they will tax the rich so it's OK right? WRONG! The rich will raise prices of what they sell us to cover it. we pay either way.
it is obvious that u have not researched anything on these accusations, its not b/c obama was born in the 60's man, obama was actaully living next door too, and was good friends with the leader of the weather underground and has numerous other ties to this orginazation, and they are not "alleged" terrorist they actually admitted to bombing the pentagon saying that it was perfect
Your argument doesn't make sense. Obama wasn't just in the same house. Obama launched his campaign from Ayers house. He is good friends with Ayers. David Axelrod said "Obama and Ayers aren't friends, it's just that their kids go to school together". That's a lie, because Obama's kids are 10 and 8, and Ayers kids are fully grown. So why would he lie about that? Kurtz isn't "trying to tie" Obama to Ayers, Obama IS tied to Ayers. It doesn't mean "every black man in Chicago is a terrorist"
Zennie, Wether it be his friends, or his extreme marxist views. The FACT is the more the truth comes out about him, and the more he puts his own foot in his mouth, the more his polls go down. Thank god for people like Kurts and korsi, who are not afraid of being called racist. I won't vote for him, does that make me racist? He will get 95% of the black vote. does that mean the other 5% are racist? No, it means most people who vote obama, don't know the facts, or refuse to accept the truth.
That was one of the most ignorant diatribes I have ever heard. You completely missed the point and admitted your stupidity by saying "I have never really heard of these guys" are you serious, do you know anything about your countries history. Stop polluting the internet with your gibberish.
Zennie with respect, it as less to do with what happened 40 years ago than the fact that Ayers is unrepenant to this day for his terrorist acts against your nation. He is a close associate of Obama and as such it calls into question Obama's judgement and values.
should we have a candidate that has a low IQ we had before the last 8 years that didn't turn out to well now did it?? I doubt McCain represents America hell he's so far gone it's not even funny. Did McCain help people of a community no? Matter of fact does McCain even no trickle down economics doesn't work.
well thats the economic plan he wants it like this let the rich give us their crumbs instead of making it easier for the middle and poor or have it to where we all are equal.
The rich don't owe you anything b*tch. If I were rich I wouldn't even give you my crumbs. You want money then go work for it like everyone else and quit trying to squeeze a handout from successful people. People are not all equal, contrary to your egalitarian fantasy. Some people are a hell of a lot smarter, talented and motivated than other people, and capitalism rewards that. All socialist wealth redistribuation can ever achieve is making everyone equally poor.
wow your such an ass but i was saying so if you were making i don't no 30k a year and someone was making i don't know 1 billion a year and the person that is making 1 billion a year pays a less percentage than you and they work just as hard as you do you think thats right?? Or lets let banks have Corporate Wealth fare where they don't pay any rent or only $100 a year??? So lets give the rich and the Wealthy a tax cut and allow them to do what they want to me thats not not we a
A person making 30K a year that pays 15% in income taxes is giving the government $4,500 a year. If a rich person making one billion a year managed to take every possible tax shelter and got his percentage down to even 5%, he would still be paying a whopping $50 million in income taxes. The righ pull far more than their share of the laod alread. Your "tax cuts for the rich" rhetoric is only a facade for liberals to foist higher taxes on the middle class.
pyronaught,what does Jesus say about the matter you just discussed?The parable of the rich man and the poor lady.
And how do you think people get rich? Do you think the Oil companies are making record profits because the CEO's are so much better than the rest of us? Or are they ripping us off? Should a hedge fund manager make $100's of millions a year? Where do you think that money comes from?
The top 10% own almost 75% of the wealth in this country.
Oil companies are making record profits because of supply and demand. They are also paying record amounts of taxes to the government, who actually makes more off a barrel than the oil companies who dig it out of the ground, refine it, and then get it to you. Thats more than the government ever did for anybody.
Anyway, some people are going to do better than others in this life. If its true that 10% own as much as 75% than that says more about the 75% than it does about the 10%.
Nice try with the racial argument, its not gunna work though. It is instructive tom the discussion though that because you hold the opinion you do you must try these sort of vapid approaches. You didnt really deal with what i said though. My point was that the numbers you are working with dont tell the whole story. You are workin with a class warfare get even with em' kind of approach which makes you just as authoritarian as anybody else.
Would Jesus tell you to rob fish from the man who has more than you just so you each have an equal amount of fish? I believe his philospohy was "teach a man to fish" instead of relying on handouts. Envy made it into the list of the seven mortal sins for good reason, it's one of the most destructive human flaws that exist. Every communist dictatorship ever to throw a nation into ruin has leveraged wealth envy among the masses to establish itself.
Look, I'm not chastising wealth. Bill Gates deserves every penny he has.
What I'm pointing out is that the economic pie is finite.The world's resources are finite.
If you look at any government stats.The wealth distribution has dramatically shifted to the top over the last 25 years.They propose tax laws to benefit themselves.
The national debt is $9.5trilion. Reagan and the two Bushes added $7T to that debt.
WalMart recently stated they back republicans,why?
Thats funny because i just heard low income workers are being hit hardest because of gas prices for reasons including the fact that the middle and upper class arent spending money..so trickle down does work when the liberal news reporter want to do another evil republican piece msnbc. Trickle down sucks because its slow, not because it doesnt work. Look the fact of the matter is the rich AND the poor are both greedy. The rich are just better at it.
Former CEO of ExxonMobil got a $400 million bonus when he retired. Who paid for that bonus? The consumer!
No one is asking for a handout,just a fair and just society.Supply side(Trickle down) economic policies are not fair. The policy has lead us to the economic woes we face today.
werv, consumers only determine the amount of money flowing into a company. It is the people working within the company or the board of directors who determine how that money gets divided up among the employees. Overcompensated CEOs is not a symptom of capitalism or the free market. It's an internal corporate issue that has no effect on you personally. The market sets the prices, not CEOs. You need to stop letting wealth envy fuel your hatred for the rich.
Look at CEO compensation of all othe industrialized nations. Japan,U.K.,Germany CEO's make 25-50 times the avg worker. In the U.S. it's 400 times. This phenomenom started occuring the last 30 years. The mentality of greed,lifestyle of the Rich and famous.This is a result of the economic policies of the right. Pro-business ,anti-labor.Deregulating industries and markets to make more and more profit. It's wrong and it is our demise.
I look at the CEO problem as just poor management of resources. That money would be better spent on expanding the company, new development, doing research etc. That's how our foreign competition spends it. The really gross overcompensation tends to occur in publicly traded corporations and is set by a board of directors who care only about short term stock price increases. It's a poor business practice, but doesn't effect anyone outside the company so it's hardly "our demise."
CEO pay has no relation to the economy. Prices are set by the market and have no relation to a CEOs salary. Only in the case of a monopoly could a company set their prices to anything they wanted to. Salaries work in a similar way. Get the government involved in regulating either one of these and you will see what a true economic disaster looks like. Or you could simply look at any number of countries that have gone down this dead-end path and learn from history.
werv, I don't see where you get your NWO correlation from. Being against tax increases and government regulation would actually be against the aims of NWO proponents. Only the government can create a real monopoly in the first place, either by nationalizing an entire industry or giving established private corporations the regulatory tools necessary to prevent competitors from getting in the game. As for the roaring 20s, it looks like it was a lot of fun if you ask me. At least while it lasted.
pyronaught,you're very knowledgeable,You're right, govt regulation is against the aims of the NWO. So think about it!! Hmmm, who has pushed govt deregulation?
Creating monopolies in the telecomm industry and the energy sector,i.e. NewsCorp,Clear channel,TimeWarner,ExxonMobil,ChevronTexaco.
They desire less govt interference in order to rape we the people.
Stop being a battered wife.Making excuses for the corporate controlled govt that beats you.LOL
werv, you've got it backwards. Regulations would be the primary instrument of a NWO. Imagine the United Nations on steriods, filled with global control freaks where all soveringty between nations is overridden. That's what NWO is all about. And don't think Obamma wouldn't be all for that situation, given his aspirations for global welfare (funded by US tax dollars of course) and his "citizens of the world" rhetoric in Berlin recently.
your still not that bright i don't care who makes more im just saying a just because a person makes over a million they shouldn't have to pay the same percent wise other words if i make 65k a year another person man 22k a year he should pay the same percent wise other words if i pay 1% or 30% of what i make that person should also pay the same amount
no you just aren't trying to understand you just keep ranting blame the liberal this and that what. What im saying if a person makes say 800,000 a year another makes 22k a year and another makes 1 billion they should all pay the same percentage. In other words if i pay 15% in my taxes and i make more money than you should pay 30 or 25 percent just because i make more money than you.
It sounds like you are talking about a flat tax then. Everyone pays the same percent. The "tax the rich" crowd would be against a flat tax because with their concept of "fairness" the rich should pay a bigger percentage. The Flat Tax is probably more viable than the National Retail Sales Tax.
Why is it that people on the left think that anyone who doesn't agree with them is closed minded, can't think for themselves or are programmed how to think by conservative talk radio? Did the thought ever cross your mind that everyone has thought out their policital positions just as much as you have thought out yours and arrived at the opposite conclusion? I'm very familiar with all the argumetns on the left, I just don't happen to agree with any of them.
The only thing that goes against anyones self interest is giving government more power and more of our money. It doesn't take Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh to convince anyone with half a brain to realize that. I'll take big corporations over big government any day of the week. Corporations can't start wars, they can't throw you in jail, they can't confiscate your property (without government help) and they can't even take your money unless you willingly trade with them.
Also the tax cuts that you support are they helping right now ?? Under Clinton we had a surplus know one was paying less taxes and now look what happened we have a president that doesn't care what he does he just doesn't what he feel is good for him or good only for people that have his views only.
im not a liberal im a realist honestly the rich and the middle should pay the same percent if the rich pay 15% the middle should pay 15% if the poor pays 30% the rich pays 30% not allow one class to have the upper hand over the other matter of fact how are the tax cuts you want work right now??????
Yes, but that ignores the fact that there are many policies and approaches that are socialist in nature. Because of that fact, the poor will always have politicians who will pander, just as the corporations do. The real problem, in my opinion, is that governments as we have defined and created them, just do not work for everybody. Its impossible. You suggest above what government doesnt possess, logic.
The income tax percent actually does go up the more rich a person gets. The liberals cry of "tax cuts for the rich" always refers to dollar amounts, because an equal tax cut accross the board for rich and poor alike will always result in more dollars saved for the rich because 1% of a large amount of money is greter than 1% of a smaller amount. Thus ANY tax cut can always be statistically manipulated into being called a "tax cut for the rich" by liberals, who oppose ANY tax cut for ANYONE.
Wrong Pyronaught,Wrong! If you take all taxes into account [Sales,State,propery,etc.},wealthy individuals pay far less % of their income in taxes because of all of the loopholes.Who writes the tax laws? Do you think the average person has capital gains or an estate to pay taxes on?
I personally would like to see a National Sales tax.We should only tax consumption not income or production.
werv, tax loopholes are available to everyone, not just the rich. If the "poor" aren't paying taxes on capital gains and estates then that's just another example of the rich paying MORE taxes than the poor. The majority of the working class does get hit with the capital gains tax however. In years where I made less than $20K in income I never even paid one dime in taxes. People who are really poor don't pay ANY taxes, and they get the MOST freebies out of government.
As for the FARC and Obama. Google it and pay close attention to what was found in the computers of the #2 FARC leader when he was killed earlier this year. The contents of the computers were verified 100% by Scottland Yard.
Hey, have fun at the convention .. I'll be headed for Colombia m'self in a couple weeks. DON'T LET HILLARY STEAL THE NOMINATION!!! :D:D
As I said, McCain is no better. I live in Arizona. In general he doesn't bother me. But what he did as part of the Keating-5 was inexcusable. I don't even understand how he managed to become the Republican candidate after they tried to censure him just within the past few years. I guess all the old folks who lost their retirement savings in the late 80's are all dead now. McCain is not my choice.
Now, how about finding something bad about MY candidate, Ron Paul?
William Ayers said that he regrets that he had not bombed more U.S. targets. Could it not be more clear what Ayers is for? Why would Obama want to associate himself with such scum?
Also, explain why Obama reps were found to be in communication with the FARC in Colombia? That wasn't 40 years ago. That was within the past year after Obama began his campaign. Don't be shocked if Clinton steals his thunder.
well i rather have a man that was ivy league educated but is not a c student but an a student and has a high iq. I wonder how high McCain iq is from what i heard not much higher than Bush and also McCain really wants another war can we actually afford this.
have you served on a board with an unrepentant domestic terrorist who on September 11th 2001 said "I don't regret setting bombs,'' Bill Ayers said. ''I feel we didn't do enough.''
thebackbencher666 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is so stupid ur in denial
dirty30yo 2 years ago
um...Obama held a fundraiser at Ayers house. There IS a connection. What that really means has yet to be discovered, but unless this is an old video that needs removed due to evidence being out, then I think you need to educate yourself.
erylone 2 years ago
Hey Stanley........Do you live in the same neighborhood as Ayers, Khalid and Rezko?
Do you know what the difference in Adolph Hitlers rise to power and becoming Chancelor of Germany and Obama becoming the president of the U.S.? .............75 Years.
TKEZN420 3 years ago
This guy is a fucking idiot.
fkappreciative 3 years ago
Your logic sucks. Living in the same city isn't what connects Obama and Ayers. Them being FRIENDS is what connects them. The Weathermen killed innocent people and planned to kill over 25 million Americans should they have come to power. They also expected to receive assistance from Cuba, the USSR and North Vietnam in the form of these countries assisting the occupation of America. The fact that Obama would associate with a murdering bastard like Ayers is repulsive. Thus Zennie, you're a tool.
hunteran 3 years ago
Dumb as a rock, Free as a bird.
jpmn223 3 years ago
This guy is a dope. "The Communist Manifesto was written 113 years before I was born! Therefore, I cannot be a Communist, even if I hang out with Communists and support their goals."
If you vote for a candidate solely on the basis of their race, that makes you a RACIST!!! There, I just blew your fucking mind.
armedpartisan 3 years ago 2
your "funny voices" and trying to bring black people of the Chicago area of the 60s into this debate simply shows off how weak the Obama argument is in regards to his connections to a known and proud terrorist.
SuperActionFight 3 years ago
What strikes me as sad is that after Ayers interview in 01 where he stated he wished he would have done more (damage)Obama is still friends with this "American terrorist." Seems to me he just has too many bad connections. I am still trying to figure out how blending in w/ the rest of your Dem. party and always voting what they vote = change. Maybe someone can help me on that. Not a stand out at all, just the same as the majority. Tax cuts so every1 can pay Fred/Fannie! = more money 4 Obama!
donnie1221 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
read this to learn more-
support bill ayers org
simplylavender 3 years ago
I had rather have Obama than a PTSD POW with anger problems. Bush is 100 worse with Ayers. He is a war criminal.
maggythecat 3 years ago
speaks volumes about your issues and none on McCain or Bush
SuperActionFight 3 years ago
bitch please!!!! fuck bush!!
dejaspud 3 years ago
hmm, I see the error of my ways, dejaspud. thanks for your weighty intellegent input.
SuperActionFight 3 years ago
typical ignorant democratic americans blaming everything on bush. You know there is a congress right? even though bush had some bad ideas most of the congress backed him. Besides, that comment was completely off subject anyway...zennie is an idiot
jwag92 2 years ago
You can deny all you want, facts are facts.
Why don't you use your brain, open your mind and read the information.
Are you nuts? Yes, you are blinded by his holiness, Obamalamadingdong.
If you were truly honest with yourself, you know given all of the history and facts behind the rise of the ONE were attributed to any other candidate, you guys would be having a cow.
Be honest, be true, come on, you know I am right.
gonzguard 3 years ago 2
If you listen you'd know that Obama's connection goes beyond serving on the same committee. Obama's announcement that he was a state senate candidate was made in William Ayers LIVINGROOM!
How can you even comment when YOU say you've never heard of the weather underground before?
fjwjr 3 years ago 2
So the fact that Barack "My Muslim Faith" Hussein Obama raises private money makes him less far left? LOL And you question Kurtz's logic?
The CLOSE ties between Hussein Obama with Ayers, and the "God d--- America" church is good evidence that Obama is not what he tries to paint himself as.
We would better of with Clinton (any of them). Thank God, many Hillary suporters will vote McCain. Whew!
sergiomats 3 years ago
THis video is still up, even after the mean proposition has been found false? Kurtz is not trying to tie Hussein Obama with the Weatherman. He is tying Bill Ayers with Obama, something that Obama doesn't seem to want! (I wonder why)
Obama said that Bill was just a guy who lives close by. Turns out he and unrepented terrorrist worked together for over 3 years, in Chicago.
Why did Obama lie, and made it apear as if Bill was just a nobody in his life, when both worked together?
sergiomats 3 years ago
Zennie you are so funny! The fact that the bombing happened when Obama was a kid is what makes it worse. The fact that Obama knew about this "before" he decided to associate with a terrorist like Ayers is what makes him look so bad.
You see if the bombing happened "after" Obama was on the board with Ayers, it would make Obama look better. Then he could say that he did not know how dangerous Ayers really was.
zerostar33 3 years ago
I just hope that they don't all come out and burn their own neighborhoods again in Los Angeles IF Barack isn't elected.
Can anyne say "Dendy riot"?
If he IS elected, maybe they will get together and have a crack-head, suicide bomber party and blow themselves up in the Whitehouse.
Just looking on the bright side.
kennyLLC 3 years ago
"they"?? you fucking racist SOB
digimaton 3 years ago
LOL!
Well, who else burned their own neighborhood in L.A. because of the Dendy incident? Genghis Khan and the Huns?
And everyone knows that O.J. was set free because they were afraid that THEY would do it all over again. Dendy wasn't crap compared to O.J..
kennyLLC 3 years ago
Zennie62, Obama DID say is is for free trade and he DOES take both sides of every issue. Here's proof. Search for the youtube video called
"Obama Trading in Contradictions"
Watch is and then tell me what you think.
I don't know where Obama really stands on anything because he says whatever he thinks people want to hear. I do however know what his actions say about him. 20 yrs of Rev Wright.
sbennettyt 3 years ago
zennie62, There is a BIG difference between guilt BY association and guilt OF association. If Obama just happened to know someone who is a racist and we tried to pin that on him that's guilt BY association. On the other hand if he is a MEMBER of a racist church for 20 yrs then he is guilty OF his associations. Big difference.
sbennettyt 3 years ago
Dude, I did answer your question. I said:
"You can report eveyrthing you know about McCain and his "ties with terrorrism". That's called "free press"." <-- DId you read that part? If you know about McCain's unions with american-haters, by all means, report it.
Remember that it doesn't change the fact that Obama is surrounded by america haters
sergiomats 3 years ago
Obama claims to be in favor of "change", however it seems that he brings nothing new. Just far-left mentality, typical of Ayers and reverend "G-d da-- the USA" Wright. Doesn't te fact that Obama has such friends puts a question mark on his allegations? What else will we discover about him, if he gets elected? The man is a mistake. Don't vote for him.
sergiomats 3 years ago 2
Saying that you are ilogical is like saying that your maths calculation is wrong. If you say that X is the same as Y, I call you ilogical. It is not an "insult".
You can report eveyrthing you know about McCain and his "ties with terrorrism". That's called "free press". What you cannot do is try to divert attention from the fact that Bill Ayers, the anti-american terrorrist, worked close by with Hussein Obama for some considerable time. That link is one that you can't erase.
sergiomats 3 years ago
Watching these youtube video put together by people that haven't a clue about what they are talking about is making me crazy. Nowhere does Kurtz try to tie Obama to the Weathermen. Let's try being honest in your smear tactics.
moonltgmblr 3 years ago
Of course it's fair and you'd have to explain what that "some way" was and the degree of "help".
But you're getting off the subject of Obama's ties to an unrepentant terrorists who is currently nowhere to be found. Obama is simply saying "This is divisive" and the "I was 8 argument" is ridiculous, not to mention amateurish.
Obama has an issue with embarrassing associations. Reverend Wright was a big one, is Ayers going to be even worse?
mateo1970 3 years ago
Kurtz isn't "trying to tie" there is a tie between the two.
Obama's political career began with a fundraiser in Ayers' home. This was in the 90's. Did you serve on a board with Ayers? Did Ayers support your candidacy for the senate? Did Ayers mentor your political career in Chicago?
mateo1970 3 years ago
Zennie62, check out the Obama file on youtube.
TIA.
boneybigears 3 years ago
Zennie, you are illogical. Kurtz is not saying that Obama is a terrorrist like Ayers. Stanley is saying that Obama had close ties with Ayers IN THE 90s, NOT in the 60s. NOw, you may not like that your candidate feels confortable working with anti-american terrorrists,but most americans might not like that.
Don't try to put words in Kurtz's mouth. Heis not linking Obama with terrorrism. He is linking Hussein Obama with Ayers. Deal with that.
sergiomats 3 years ago
making sense? What does it have to do with being black? You're an idiot.
Just to give you a clue. Ayers and Dorhn are UNREPENTANT terrorists who still attack the United States TODAY in their classes.
eschuela 3 years ago
That's right. Ayers, and Reverend "G-D da-- America" Wright are closely tied with Hussein Obama, and that is a fact. Zennnie is trying to divert attention with no sucess.
I hope Hussein Obama gets the boot out. Americans don't need a far left, lying, anti-american, good for nothing wannabe president like Husssein OBama.
sergiomats 3 years ago
You've ignored the point with some kind of red herring about being 8 years old in the '60's. What Kurtz is actually showing is that while Obama wants to NOW portray himself as a centrist to garner more votes, he in fact is VERY leftist in his philosophies, as proved by his associations with black racists and radicals. I just want to know who this guy is on the presidential ballot.
emeraldgypsy 3 years ago 2
Instead of attacking Stanley Kurtz why can't you
talk about the charges being made, not just make fun. Didn't Bill Ayres help start Obama's political career? If there is no connection, why the cover-up?
kentube59 3 years ago
The guy in this video is a real CLOWN, Mushmouth wannabe. JMO.
boneybigears 3 years ago
I known what an ignorant fool and of a course this fool is a racist, because when did investating Obama have to do with him being black?
Are Ayers and Dorhn black? No, why is this fool brining up race?
eschuela 3 years ago
Nothing you can say can justify or explain away Obama's relationship with Ayers.
Obama's judgment is incredibly poor, and his attempts to silence his critics on this matter exposes him as nothing more than a left wing fascist.
barrysbody 3 years ago
there's nothing to explain away. Ayers AFTER BOASTING was cleared to work on FEDERAL PROPERTY at the university of Illinois there's nothing you can or need to do about it except list your candidates creditials. My candidate has already shown that he is in touch with people LOL
blkskin1 3 years ago
I can't say I agree with either party. Neither party has done crap to secure our borders, Neither party has done crap to prevent our industries from moving over seas. Neither party has done crap to make energy affordable but given the choice between bad and worse (which is the choice we have) I'll NEVER vote for that honky hating 6B6M6.
In fact this will be the first time I have found a reason to vote. NO-BAMA
Hannity makes some good points but Lou Dobbs would be my first choice for president.
sbennettyt 3 years ago
sbennettyt,I agree about the parties.
But the Republicans got us here,the Dems fault is they allowed the GOP to do it.
Like I said NAFTA was started during BusH41,Clinton signed it into law.
A lot of Dems voted for the war in Iraq,so you're right both sides are guilty.
Might as well give Obama a chance, how much more could he muck things up?
POW McCain=WWIII
Hannity sucks,at least Dobbs and even Glenn Beck will tell the truth.
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
I considered Obama until he endorsed free trade. He lost my vote there. He has taken both sides of every issue. He'll say anything.
After Rev Wright I'll vote for ANYBODY but Obama. Ok issues. The war is over we won. Health insurance drives up Dr. prices. Outlaw ALL insurance and prices will fall to affordable market levels. It increases demand 4 services. A recent scratch cost me $400. Would I have paid without insurance? NO I would have stayed home but yes I did pay through premiums. Get it?
sbennettyt 3 years ago
They weren't "accused of allegedly bombing", they proudly boasted of it, and Ayers said he is "guilty as sin, free as a bird, it's a great country" and he wished he'd done more.
The issue is not that Obama was in Chicago in the 60s, because he WASN'T. The issue is that they are friends, Obama considers Ayers to be "respectable" and "mainstream", and describes his relationship with Ayers as "friendly". And they've appeared together at several speaking engagements arranged by Michelle Obama.
machalot 3 years ago
Nevermind that America's working class has the highest standard of living in the world. We have more toys, better food, better roads, better entertainment and burn more oil driving around in our SUVs, jet skis, boats and RVs than any other country. Yet that's not good enough for this mass of disgruntled voters who are so riddled with class envy that they are on the brink of electing an economicaly ignorant socialist who would most likely send this country into the next great depression!
pyronaught 3 years ago
pyro,some OPEC countries have a higher per capita income than we do.They also provide their citizens with free college and healthcare. Now before you tell me to go move there since they have it so good,know that I'm just stating facts.
This is not about class envy,it's about redistributing the wealth.You people on the right are fine with a shift to the top because you tend to be authoritarians.
But God forbid if the working class demands better wages and benefits,that's a handout.
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
I stand corrected depending upon what category you look at the U.S ranks 5th in GNI per capita.
Source: NationMaster(.)com
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
And lastly,blastingcaps says it takes time for the wealth to trickle down. Ok, Reagan started the "VooDOO" 25 years ago, look at the mess we're in now.
WalMart type jobs,record home forclosure,record deficits and debts,record bankruptcies,rising college costs, but the top 10% are doing quite well.
Limbaugh and his ilk say,"Well get a better job,pull yourself up by the bootstraps"
Tell that crap to Bush and McCain,how'd they get rich?
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
You guys need to stop giving presidents credit/blame for economic trends that are beyond their control. Clinton had nothing to do with the internet boom that kept the good times rolling during his term, just like Bush had nothing to do with its inevitable collapse, or 911, or oil speculation, or lenders making risky loans under the assumption that real estate values would always go up. Sh!t happens. The prez is usually just along for the ride with little control over complex economic trends.
pyronaught 3 years ago
Come on pyro,do you know about Cheney's energy meeting? Have you heard about Ken Lay,Phil Gramm and Enron? How about Tom DeLay,Jack Abramoff and the Marianas.
Do you know why the finacial markets are being manipulated?Do you understand that deregulation means no oversight?
Why do you think they want to privatize everything.
Government employees still get a pension,why did Reagan implement 401K?
All of this is about greed and concentrating the wealth in the hands of the very few.
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
Weatherman or no weatherman. We KNOW Obama was in that whitey hating church for 20 yrs and we KNOW Obama tells 7 year old girls America isn't the country it once was or could be. And we know Michelle wasn't proud of her country and we know Obama snears down his elitist nose at the poor dumb working man clinging to his guns and religion and that's enough for me to say F Borak Insane 6B6M6 anti-christ. And you are voting for him why? You hate whitey too?????????
sbennettyt 3 years ago
Stop listening to Sean Hannity!
Hate whitey?? LOL
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
yup sure do all the reason to vote for him
jblive1985 3 years ago
jbive, No I guess you don't get it. My point is private insurance drives up prices. Bad. Government health care would do that too but even worse because it would limit your choices.
Like the long lines at the DMV? That's what you would get with government health care and no place else to turn. Plus there is no such thing as free. You pay in higher taxes. But you think they will tax the rich so it's OK right? WRONG! The rich will raise prices of what they sell us to cover it. we pay either way.
sbennettyt 3 years ago
you don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.
never heard that either?, huh?
46 years of ignorance doesn't change anything.
seandelgado 3 years ago
That`s not make any logical sense to me !!!!!
Trusten1984 3 years ago
it is obvious that u have not researched anything on these accusations, its not b/c obama was born in the 60's man, obama was actaully living next door too, and was good friends with the leader of the weather underground and has numerous other ties to this orginazation, and they are not "alleged" terrorist they actually admitted to bombing the pentagon saying that it was perfect
masevicious 3 years ago 2
Another Great vid.
packetscan 3 years ago
Your argument doesn't make sense. Obama wasn't just in the same house. Obama launched his campaign from Ayers house. He is good friends with Ayers. David Axelrod said "Obama and Ayers aren't friends, it's just that their kids go to school together". That's a lie, because Obama's kids are 10 and 8, and Ayers kids are fully grown. So why would he lie about that? Kurtz isn't "trying to tie" Obama to Ayers, Obama IS tied to Ayers. It doesn't mean "every black man in Chicago is a terrorist"
heatsketch 3 years ago 2
You are making this an issue of race when it isn't an issue of race at all.
heatsketch 3 years ago
sorry not in the same "house" in the same "city"
heatsketch 3 years ago
Keep drinking that Kool-Aid....
WindsorFox 3 years ago
"Allegedly bombing government targets?!?!"
Ayers admits to it! Says, "We didn't do enough."
I'm old enough to remember Bill Ayers and his revolutionary-wannabe-hippie band of BOMBING MURDERERS.
The fact that Obama would step into the same room with this creep disqualifies him for the presidency in my estimation.
ancestralyuba 3 years ago
Zennie, Wether it be his friends, or his extreme marxist views. The FACT is the more the truth comes out about him, and the more he puts his own foot in his mouth, the more his polls go down. Thank god for people like Kurts and korsi, who are not afraid of being called racist. I won't vote for him, does that make me racist? He will get 95% of the black vote. does that mean the other 5% are racist? No, it means most people who vote obama, don't know the facts, or refuse to accept the truth.
chuck74130 3 years ago 3
That was one of the most ignorant diatribes I have ever heard. You completely missed the point and admitted your stupidity by saying "I have never really heard of these guys" are you serious, do you know anything about your countries history. Stop polluting the internet with your gibberish.
bcrez 3 years ago 2
Zennie with respect, it as less to do with what happened 40 years ago than the fact that Ayers is unrepenant to this day for his terrorist acts against your nation. He is a close associate of Obama and as such it calls into question Obama's judgement and values.
Have fun at the convention. Stay safe.
kanawa 3 years ago 3
should we have a candidate that has a low IQ we had before the last 8 years that didn't turn out to well now did it?? I doubt McCain represents America hell he's so far gone it's not even funny. Did McCain help people of a community no? Matter of fact does McCain even no trickle down economics doesn't work.
rell127 3 years ago
"does McCain even no trickle down economics"
Maybe not. But I think he can spell.
ancestralyuba 3 years ago
well thats the economic plan he wants it like this let the rich give us their crumbs instead of making it easier for the middle and poor or have it to where we all are equal.
rell127 3 years ago
rell127,
No offense, but I'll be looking to other sources for economic analysis.
ancestralyuba 3 years ago
go on youtube and type in obama tax plan you will be surprised.
rell127 3 years ago
The rich don't owe you anything b*tch. If I were rich I wouldn't even give you my crumbs. You want money then go work for it like everyone else and quit trying to squeeze a handout from successful people. People are not all equal, contrary to your egalitarian fantasy. Some people are a hell of a lot smarter, talented and motivated than other people, and capitalism rewards that. All socialist wealth redistribuation can ever achieve is making everyone equally poor.
pyronaught 3 years ago
wow your such an ass but i was saying so if you were making i don't no 30k a year and someone was making i don't know 1 billion a year and the person that is making 1 billion a year pays a less percentage than you and they work just as hard as you do you think thats right?? Or lets let banks have Corporate Wealth fare where they don't pay any rent or only $100 a year??? So lets give the rich and the Wealthy a tax cut and allow them to do what they want to me thats not not we a
rell127 3 years ago
A person making 30K a year that pays 15% in income taxes is giving the government $4,500 a year. If a rich person making one billion a year managed to take every possible tax shelter and got his percentage down to even 5%, he would still be paying a whopping $50 million in income taxes. The righ pull far more than their share of the laod alread. Your "tax cuts for the rich" rhetoric is only a facade for liberals to foist higher taxes on the middle class.
pyronaught 3 years ago
pyronaught,what does Jesus say about the matter you just discussed?The parable of the rich man and the poor lady.
And how do you think people get rich? Do you think the Oil companies are making record profits because the CEO's are so much better than the rest of us? Or are they ripping us off? Should a hedge fund manager make $100's of millions a year? Where do you think that money comes from?
The top 10% own almost 75% of the wealth in this country.
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
Oil companies are making record profits because of supply and demand. They are also paying record amounts of taxes to the government, who actually makes more off a barrel than the oil companies who dig it out of the ground, refine it, and then get it to you. Thats more than the government ever did for anybody.
Anyway, some people are going to do better than others in this life. If its true that 10% own as much as 75% than that says more about the 75% than it does about the 10%.
blastingcaps 3 years ago
blastingcaps, Can you name me the top 5 corporations by revenue and income. I'll give you a hint <it's big oil and WalMart.
So since you believe Oil is amking record profits because of S&D,let's study WalMart.
WalMart is the nation's largest employer.They had @nd most profits last quarter behind Exxon.
How well do they pay their employees?
Let's say I'm a slave on the plantation.What you guys are trying to tell me is that Master deserves the big White Mansion because he just does.
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
Nice try with the racial argument, its not gunna work though. It is instructive tom the discussion though that because you hold the opinion you do you must try these sort of vapid approaches. You didnt really deal with what i said though. My point was that the numbers you are working with dont tell the whole story. You are workin with a class warfare get even with em' kind of approach which makes you just as authoritarian as anybody else.
Why do you have such a problem with success?
blastingcaps 3 years ago
Would Jesus tell you to rob fish from the man who has more than you just so you each have an equal amount of fish? I believe his philospohy was "teach a man to fish" instead of relying on handouts. Envy made it into the list of the seven mortal sins for good reason, it's one of the most destructive human flaws that exist. Every communist dictatorship ever to throw a nation into ruin has leveraged wealth envy among the masses to establish itself.
pyronaught 3 years ago
Look, I'm not chastising wealth. Bill Gates deserves every penny he has.
What I'm pointing out is that the economic pie is finite.The world's resources are finite.
If you look at any government stats.The wealth distribution has dramatically shifted to the top over the last 25 years.They propose tax laws to benefit themselves.
The national debt is $9.5trilion. Reagan and the two Bushes added $7T to that debt.
WalMart recently stated they back republicans,why?
Trickle down has failed!
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
Thats funny because i just heard low income workers are being hit hardest because of gas prices for reasons including the fact that the middle and upper class arent spending money..so trickle down does work when the liberal news reporter want to do another evil republican piece msnbc. Trickle down sucks because its slow, not because it doesnt work. Look the fact of the matter is the rich AND the poor are both greedy. The rich are just better at it.
blastingcaps 3 years ago
I agree with you about the greed factor.
But the poor don't make the laws. And republicans tend to favor the top 10%.
Bush calls them his base!
The rich are going to be rich,so shouldn't we elect a government that represents the rest of the 90% of us?
I didn't bring up the Master/Slave analogy to be racial.I'm saying it's easy to get rich by exploiting labor i.e. WalMart.
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
I support my stance through research over the years since I graduated college as a business major.
Check out some of the videos I have favorited on economics.
The Story of Stuff(.)com also lays out a pretty compelling argument to support what I'm saying.
Anyway you guys have a great day!
And by all means if you have some insightful videos to enlighten me,please do share.
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
"teach a man how to fish" good one.
You're ignoring my point Sean Hannity.
Former CEO of ExxonMobil got a $400 million bonus when he retired. Who paid for that bonus? The consumer!
No one is asking for a handout,just a fair and just society.Supply side(Trickle down) economic policies are not fair. The policy has lead us to the economic woes we face today.
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
werv, consumers only determine the amount of money flowing into a company. It is the people working within the company or the board of directors who determine how that money gets divided up among the employees. Overcompensated CEOs is not a symptom of capitalism or the free market. It's an internal corporate issue that has no effect on you personally. The market sets the prices, not CEOs. You need to stop letting wealth envy fuel your hatred for the rich.
pyronaught 3 years ago
pyronaught, it's not wealth envy.
Look at CEO compensation of all othe industrialized nations. Japan,U.K.,Germany CEO's make 25-50 times the avg worker. In the U.S. it's 400 times. This phenomenom started occuring the last 30 years. The mentality of greed,lifestyle of the Rich and famous.This is a result of the economic policies of the right. Pro-business ,anti-labor.Deregulating industries and markets to make more and more profit. It's wrong and it is our demise.
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
I look at the CEO problem as just poor management of resources. That money would be better spent on expanding the company, new development, doing research etc. That's how our foreign competition spends it. The really gross overcompensation tends to occur in publicly traded corporations and is set by a board of directors who care only about short term stock price increases. It's a poor business practice, but doesn't effect anyone outside the company so it's hardly "our demise."
pyronaught 3 years ago
I agree pyronaught,but there's one caveat,the money supply.
Consumers cut back on their purchaces,which leads to a domino effect on the economy.
We've had economic expansion over the Bush years,but wages and income have stayed flat.
The savings rate is in the negative,which means people are using plastic and home equity.
At the same time the top income earners are doing great,bigger slice of the pie.
Bush said he would make "the pie higher".
Increased money supply weakens currency.
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
Combine all the factors and the result is what we're now facing economically in this country.
Bailing out banks,auto,the airline,retail all sectors of our economy are in trouble.
The debt as a percentage of GDP isn't bad,but it always increases under"less government"republicans.
Why do you think Bush Sr. called it "VooDoo economics", until he got on board with the NWO?
Why do you think McCain called the Bush Tax cuts "irresponsible",until he got on board with the NWO?
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
CEO pay has no relation to the economy. Prices are set by the market and have no relation to a CEOs salary. Only in the case of a monopoly could a company set their prices to anything they wanted to. Salaries work in a similar way. Get the government involved in regulating either one of these and you will see what a true economic disaster looks like. Or you could simply look at any number of countries that have gone down this dead-end path and learn from history.
pyronaught 3 years ago
Ok pyro,I get where you're coming from.
You're a proponent of the NWO and I'm not.
Let's just have it like it was during the industrial revolution,a few rich people and everyone else just getting by.
Why do you think they enacted all the legislation back then against monopolies and the robber barons,labor laws also?
We indeed need to learn from history. Compare now to pre-Great Depression days,do you see any similarities?
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
werv, I don't see where you get your NWO correlation from. Being against tax increases and government regulation would actually be against the aims of NWO proponents. Only the government can create a real monopoly in the first place, either by nationalizing an entire industry or giving established private corporations the regulatory tools necessary to prevent competitors from getting in the game. As for the roaring 20s, it looks like it was a lot of fun if you ask me. At least while it lasted.
pyronaught 3 years ago
pyronaught,you're very knowledgeable,You're right, govt regulation is against the aims of the NWO. So think about it!! Hmmm, who has pushed govt deregulation?
Creating monopolies in the telecomm industry and the energy sector,i.e. NewsCorp,Clear channel,TimeWarner,ExxonMobil,ChevronTexaco.
They desire less govt interference in order to rape we the people.
Stop being a battered wife.Making excuses for the corporate controlled govt that beats you.LOL
Dick Cheney (CEO or VP)
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
werv, you've got it backwards. Regulations would be the primary instrument of a NWO. Imagine the United Nations on steriods, filled with global control freaks where all soveringty between nations is overridden. That's what NWO is all about. And don't think Obamma wouldn't be all for that situation, given his aspirations for global welfare (funded by US tax dollars of course) and his "citizens of the world" rhetoric in Berlin recently.
pyronaught 3 years ago
your still not that bright i don't care who makes more im just saying a just because a person makes over a million they shouldn't have to pay the same percent wise other words if i make 65k a year another person man 22k a year he should pay the same percent wise other words if i pay 1% or 30% of what i make that person should also pay the same amount
rell127 3 years ago
rell127, I have no idea what you are trying to say really because your messages are pretty much one continuous incoherent run-on sentence.
pyronaught 3 years ago
no you just aren't trying to understand you just keep ranting blame the liberal this and that what. What im saying if a person makes say 800,000 a year another makes 22k a year and another makes 1 billion they should all pay the same percentage. In other words if i pay 15% in my taxes and i make more money than you should pay 30 or 25 percent just because i make more money than you.
rell127 3 years ago
It sounds like you are talking about a flat tax then. Everyone pays the same percent. The "tax the rich" crowd would be against a flat tax because with their concept of "fairness" the rich should pay a bigger percentage. The Flat Tax is probably more viable than the National Retail Sales Tax.
pyronaught 3 years ago
see what what im talking about im a realist you sound like your very far to the right thats not good you should be more open minded.
rell127 3 years ago
Why is it that people on the left think that anyone who doesn't agree with them is closed minded, can't think for themselves or are programmed how to think by conservative talk radio? Did the thought ever cross your mind that everyone has thought out their policital positions just as much as you have thought out yours and arrived at the opposite conclusion? I'm very familiar with all the argumetns on the left, I just don't happen to agree with any of them.
pyronaught 3 years ago
really the way you were typing you like coulter's and o'rielly right hand but hey thats what you were saying i do agree with you
rell127 3 years ago
I don't think you're closeminded. I just know that right-wing media(talk radio in particular)is a mouthpiece for the corporations.
They have convinced millions of people to go against their own economic self interest.
How can anyone who is not wealthy think it's a good thing to not raise the min. wage for 10 years or that unions are a bad thing?
How can anyone who paid $1.50/gal for gas in 2000 and now pays $3.50/gal while the ceo got $400B bonus,think it's OK?
Cuz Limbaugh says so?
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
The only thing that goes against anyones self interest is giving government more power and more of our money. It doesn't take Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh to convince anyone with half a brain to realize that. I'll take big corporations over big government any day of the week. Corporations can't start wars, they can't throw you in jail, they can't confiscate your property (without government help) and they can't even take your money unless you willingly trade with them.
pyronaught 3 years ago
pyro,when we go to war to "protect America's interest" what interest do you think they're talking about. Corporate interest,ok!
Corporations can't start wars,lol!
How much has Halliburton,GE,Genaral Dynamic,et al, made off of this current war?
Reaserch Dole(U.S) fruit co. and war in South America.Why do you think we're in Iraq?,you don't come off as naive!
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
NAFTA was first conceived during Reagan/Bush.
Clinton signed it into law.Ross Perot was the lone voice of truth during that election.
Clinton got on board with the NWO.
Obama will get on board or face the reality. JFK wouldn't get on board.
The federal reserve(money supply) is controlled by it's shareholders.
Our interest is not their interest and they are telling us to "eat cake".
This IS a class war and they are winning.
The right-wing media is their voice.
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
Also the tax cuts that you support are they helping right now ?? Under Clinton we had a surplus know one was paying less taxes and now look what happened we have a president that doesn't care what he does he just doesn't what he feel is good for him or good only for people that have his views only.
rell127 3 years ago
im not a liberal im a realist honestly the rich and the middle should pay the same percent if the rich pay 15% the middle should pay 15% if the poor pays 30% the rich pays 30% not allow one class to have the upper hand over the other matter of fact how are the tax cuts you want work right now??????
rell127 3 years ago
Yes, but that ignores the fact that there are many policies and approaches that are socialist in nature. Because of that fact, the poor will always have politicians who will pander, just as the corporations do. The real problem, in my opinion, is that governments as we have defined and created them, just do not work for everybody. Its impossible. You suggest above what government doesnt possess, logic.
blastingcaps 3 years ago
i agree with you atleast you make a point compare to that other guy.
rell127 3 years ago
The income tax percent actually does go up the more rich a person gets. The liberals cry of "tax cuts for the rich" always refers to dollar amounts, because an equal tax cut accross the board for rich and poor alike will always result in more dollars saved for the rich because 1% of a large amount of money is greter than 1% of a smaller amount. Thus ANY tax cut can always be statistically manipulated into being called a "tax cut for the rich" by liberals, who oppose ANY tax cut for ANYONE.
pyronaught 3 years ago
Wrong Pyronaught,Wrong! If you take all taxes into account [Sales,State,propery,etc.},wealthy individuals pay far less % of their income in taxes because of all of the loopholes.Who writes the tax laws? Do you think the average person has capital gains or an estate to pay taxes on?
I personally would like to see a National Sales tax.We should only tax consumption not income or production.
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
werv, tax loopholes are available to everyone, not just the rich. If the "poor" aren't paying taxes on capital gains and estates then that's just another example of the rich paying MORE taxes than the poor. The majority of the working class does get hit with the capital gains tax however. In years where I made less than $20K in income I never even paid one dime in taxes. People who are really poor don't pay ANY taxes, and they get the MOST freebies out of government.
pyronaught 3 years ago
pyronaught, I agree on that point.The top 10% pay roughly 70% of the taxes,but like I stated earlier they own 75% of the wealth.
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
For disclosure purposes,I'm no way poor,but I'm not in the top 10%,YET.
But I understand I have to pay my fair share of taxes for the common good of the society that affords me my lifestyle.
The majority of our taxes goes to Defense.
So I'm with Ron Paul on cutting back our policing of the world.
wervasdeferens 3 years ago
Zennie, I like your page but your comments in regards to McCain is a red herring. Your video and Robert697's comments have nothing to do with McCain.
Bringing up McCain, when Robert697 was clear on his thoughts about McCain, is an attempt to steer clear from the valid questions presented.
That said, I hope you enjoy your time at the convention. Be well.
droman30 3 years ago
Wow you look pretty good for 46
rollinmitchell1 3 years ago
Zennie62 say hello to Neal Boortz if you see him there. Have fun and keep us informed. Love your posts.
jimisback 3 years ago
As for the FARC and Obama. Google it and pay close attention to what was found in the computers of the #2 FARC leader when he was killed earlier this year. The contents of the computers were verified 100% by Scottland Yard.
Hey, have fun at the convention .. I'll be headed for Colombia m'self in a couple weeks. DON'T LET HILLARY STEAL THE NOMINATION!!! :D:D
Shalom
Robert697 3 years ago
As I said, McCain is no better. I live in Arizona. In general he doesn't bother me. But what he did as part of the Keating-5 was inexcusable. I don't even understand how he managed to become the Republican candidate after they tried to censure him just within the past few years. I guess all the old folks who lost their retirement savings in the late 80's are all dead now. McCain is not my choice.
Now, how about finding something bad about MY candidate, Ron Paul?
Robert697 3 years ago
William Ayers said that he regrets that he had not bombed more U.S. targets. Could it not be more clear what Ayers is for? Why would Obama want to associate himself with such scum?
Also, explain why Obama reps were found to be in communication with the FARC in Colombia? That wasn't 40 years ago. That was within the past year after Obama began his campaign. Don't be shocked if Clinton steals his thunder.
McCain is no better. I'm writing in Ron Paul.
Robert697 3 years ago
I am in Europe so maybe it is different but I saw you around three hours ago approx. 09:00 Central European Time! So well done!!
I see you are also a business owner who is a keen film maker!
alanheath 3 years ago
Ayers feels he did the right things--still.
Hudd1950 3 years ago
I just saw you on CNN!!
alanheath 3 years ago
How is it a 'witch hunt' to show a connection that actually does exist (despite your blindness to anything possibly negative about Obama).
Ayers is the one who got Obama the job on the board. Obama then obtained funding for Ayers radical education programs.
When Obama launched his political career - it was launched at Ayers house.
This is much more than them 'just living in the same city'. You Obama backers really need to face up to who the man you are backing really is.
McCain '08!
dgroundhog 3 years ago
well i rather have a man that was ivy league educated but is not a c student but an a student and has a high iq. I wonder how high McCain iq is from what i heard not much higher than Bush and also McCain really wants another war can we actually afford this.
rell127 3 years ago
Yea, I woulda guessed around 30 too.
PoliticalOverload 3 years ago
They are scraping the bottom of the barrel! BTW, I thought you were around 30 like me man!
Steadno 3 years ago
Weather Underground
Steadno 3 years ago