@ninearthify Think of a 3x3. You can't have adjacent blue-green centers. On a 4x4 you do get this. You can also move these "centers" through other centers to correct it. I think that's a more intuitive, very visual way to think of a parity. Parity is nothing but a term we cubers picked to describe the new shapes/moves the cube can take by it's unique construction, but it's not in any other technical way different from "orientation" or "permutation" cases.
can somebody explain to me why parity occurs on the 4x4x4 and not on the 3x3x3 ? I find this phenomenon extremely interesting and would like to know why it happens, thanks in advance
@beatboxCRO once you have all the edge pieces grouped together that's like a single edge piece on a 3x3 and the 4 center pieces are like 1 center piece on a 3x3
@SlashKidGuitar he solved like a 3x3x3 rubiks cube, to know how to do that you first have to know how to solve a 3x3x3 rubiks cube, he says that in the first part of the tutorial
there's something wrong with tour parity algorithms (the versions that are written down). if i want to resolve that parity stuff i need to follow you ''live'' step by step. one thing that I've noticed is that sometimes when it says 2L*, you do 2L*, 2l.
I'm having a problem with my 4x4x4 and I'm hoping someone can help me out. I'm able to solve a 3x3x3 and I can do the 4x4x4 fine to the point where it becomes a big 3x3x3, but when I go to get the cross on the bottom of the cube at the start of the final layer I only get one side missing, whereas I usually I only have 2 or 4. It's confusing me so much, help please?
@Joeseffel That's parity. Use parity algorithm 2 with the wrong edge right in front of you and it's on the top layer. Just watch the video to know what I mean.
I get fucking writing's cramp when working with this thing, especially when solving the corner-pieces (in-before the Allan-algorithm). Solving my 3x3 feels like rubbing oil on a baby's arse in comparison.
please help: at 3:40 you give an algorithm for when the 4 remaining pieces are directly across from each other however im stuck when i have only the 4 unsolved left but their kitty corner and I dont know what to do to solve it. thanks for the help in advance. can u PM it to me.
@TyTyTyBoy When the four remaining peices are kitty corner, you'll want to hold those pices in front, and do the algorithm, R' F D' F', then they should be directly across from each other. Then you can do D* R F' U R' F D'*.
when two edge pieces are across from each other rather than kiddy-corner there is a faster algorithum that is a little less difficult to remember its : R, U`, B, 2R
Is it possible to get 2 parity cases at the same time ? Because just like jaxnRds i can`t form a cross on the top layer so i thought i solve it without making the cross but at the right place, but now the corner pieces wont get in place either... am i doing something terribly wrong or do i just got very bad luck and in any case how do i fix it ? Please help
@kingcool6 It is possible to have more than one parity case. It has happend to me before. This is somthing that to me dosn't happend occasonly but when it does happen, you could get multiple partty cases or the same case multiple times.
@911devel ok thx,another question, at the end when i are suppose to get the corner pieces right, i got them on right place but it seems you cant use the normal algoritm Ri Di R D cuz then you screw the rest of the cube up, how do i solve that ?
@kingcool6 I'm not completely sure. I'll have to get back to you on that question. My guess is that maybe trying the algorithm for parody case 1 or 4.
I'm currently working on a 4x4x4 layer-by-layer solve,but as of now, I'm stuck on the forth layer. Could you help me out here?
Trying to figure out how to switch the middle (not center) pieces on the top layer to lign them up, but nothing I do seems to work. Appreciate every suggestion you have! Or I'd be glad if you could post a private video with just the 4th layer solve.
I have a problem, PLEASE HELP! When I'm solving my 4x4 like a 3x3 I end up stumbling onto a predicament. When I'm doing the algorithm: F, R, U, R', U', F'. I can't get the colors of the top layer to form a cross on the top. Any help? :/
okay, i have a problem... i can get it completely solved except for one little corner which is flipped around... i try solving it like the normal 3x3x3 way, but it just mixes it up... i cannot figure out what im doing wrong, and when i tried mixing it up and doing it again, it didn't work either...
at 2:10 you dont need to do the algorithm, you can just turn left or right side 180 degreeds ( sorry for my bad english ) and then you just turn them so they will be on bar and to the thing
I am finished with the centers and the middle pieces are lined up so it is basically like an unscrambled 3x3x3 and when I try to solve it like the original, none of the corners match up. Did I do something wrong?
@kight1994 When you get to that point, assure that you have a corner piece in it's correct spot. Say you wanted to solve an orange/green/yellow piece. Make sure that you have the orange and yellow and green corner piece in the correct location -- next to the the orange, yellow or green side. Then do the Ri Di R D algorithm.
Hey buddy, I’m about to go on a very long trip across country. The problem I’m running into is that the video will not let me play it on my iPhone. Please allow playback on iPhones so I can solve this crazy a** cube. Thanks
I have learned the most about how to solve the 4x4x4 rubiks cube parity cases from you. I have been from video to video and yours is the only one that i actually learned from. Thank you so much for making this video:)
Sometimes when i start solving the cube like it was a 3x3x3 i finish 3 layers and when i am trying to get the cross on the top i can't because the patern is wrong. Anyone else have the same problem?
Dan, your 3x3 videos were excellent, but this one is just a mess. I am completly stuck on trying to figure out the pairs. Everytime I move one, the other one gets out of place. "Moving an unsolved one there and a solved one here and turning it" doesn't help.
This is way too hard to follow. You need to make a whole new part 3 to this 4x4x4 series. This one is absolutely terrible. Please make a new one. Everyone can follow everything up to this video. After about two minutes you just start saying, "you have to put this into the solved layer and then you put this there and then this right there to make those two good". That makes no sense even with the visual aid of the video.
my corners are all flip flop ,like i have finish the green top and the cross is made but for like the orange and yellow corner orange is on yellow side and yellow and is orange side but the green being on top is in the right spot i don't know if the person who gave the cube for free fudged up all the corners before hand or if this is a actual problem with solving the cube also this has happen with each corner being on the wrong side but the main top color being all right
@GaTohacks 5x5 is essentially just like the 4x4, except for the fact that you need to solve three layer centers and edges instead of two. You really don't need a tutorial for it. If you don't trust your intuition, try MeMyselfandPi. He has tutorials for everything, though I warn you of his voice.
actually, u only need to remember 2 parity algorithm and one is ezy to remember (The shortest one). The other is the front flipped one. Its because the swapped diagonal pieces are caused by the misaligned "True" centre corner piece which causes the diagonal pieces to appear "Wrong" and by using the 3rd (or 5th) parity algorithm u will solve it (I tried it works every time!) so technically there is only 5 algorithms to remember for 4x4 and requirese 3x3 prerequisites haha
@TheCirrus45 That means you previously disassembled your cube and it is unsolvable. Either that, or you need to do the algorithm that switches the top corners (L' U R U' L U R') once more
when start the top level near the end of solving it one of the two middle paired pieces is upside down and it screws everything up and i can't fix it HELP!! sad face
@pogobat i noticed that the solve for parity case 2 gave you parity case 3. haha solve it like normal...nope! you got us it becomes parity case 2. Good save though solving the problem you hoped people didn't notice in parity case 2 in parity case 3.
Ok so normally i start with the black(white) face and when i get to the yellow it always comes out wrong and i cannot solve it it will always come as a T shape when i need it to come out as a strait line or a right angle
@ThePhnx21 well if it keeps doin that . well have you ever took your cube apart if you have thats probably the reason you then put it back wrong ur just doin it wrong hopefully it helps
@ThePhnx21 It's a parity case. Just pretend that it's flipped the right way and continue to solve as normal, then they will be the only two the wrong way at the end. That's where you need the 2nd parity algorithm and after that it should be solved.
Comment removed
bananaboy123321 5 hours ago
I screwed it up O_O
bananaboy123321 10 hours ago
my 3x3x3 looks like Lego duplo and the 4x4x4 looks like Lego Technic...
legofreak55555 3 days ago in playlist Autres vidéos de pogobat
i need help..
on the video, he said that " D*, R, F', U, R', F, D'* " is used when you get something like what's on 3:27..
my question is, what to do when they are at the kittie corners instead of across of each other...
thanks!!
151mewtwo 3 days ago
every time he says F, U or 2U I think he is saying eff you and to you.
us3r5 3 days ago in playlist More videos from pogobat
l prime r wtf im a rubicks cube dummie. thanks for making feel like an idiot.
scratchme00s 4 days ago
Thx man i solved it
Fooliom123 5 days ago
@ninearthify Think of a 3x3. You can't have adjacent blue-green centers. On a 4x4 you do get this. You can also move these "centers" through other centers to correct it. I think that's a more intuitive, very visual way to think of a parity. Parity is nothing but a term we cubers picked to describe the new shapes/moves the cube can take by it's unique construction, but it's not in any other technical way different from "orientation" or "permutation" cases.
otterspotter 6 days ago
Oh by the way, if anyone wants to learn another parity algorithm, it is F,U
athudada 1 week ago
Thank you so much!!!!! This helped me so much!!!!
athudada 1 week ago
can somebody explain to me why parity occurs on the 4x4x4 and not on the 3x3x3 ? I find this phenomenon extremely interesting and would like to know why it happens, thanks in advance
ninearthify 1 week ago
i dont get it how can it be unscrambled 3x3x3 rubiks cube?
beatboxCRO 1 week ago
@beatboxCRO once you have all the edge pieces grouped together that's like a single edge piece on a 3x3 and the 4 center pieces are like 1 center piece on a 3x3
tacoismykitty 1 week ago
Wtf did you do between 4:10- 4:51
SlashKidGuitar 1 week ago
@SlashKidGuitar he solved like a 3x3x3 rubiks cube, to know how to do that you first have to know how to solve a 3x3x3 rubiks cube, he says that in the first part of the tutorial
000345naruto 6 days ago
there's something wrong with tour parity algorithms (the versions that are written down). if i want to resolve that parity stuff i need to follow you ''live'' step by step. one thing that I've noticed is that sometimes when it says 2L*, you do 2L*, 2l.
demonbre 1 week ago
* R'
shivinwason17 1 week ago
8:47 YOU F*** U PRIME
shivinwason17 1 week ago
8:44 F*** YOU
shivinwason17 1 week ago
finally solved it.. thanks!!
Crazyspadez7986 1 week ago
I'm having a problem with my 4x4x4 and I'm hoping someone can help me out. I'm able to solve a 3x3x3 and I can do the 4x4x4 fine to the point where it becomes a big 3x3x3, but when I go to get the cross on the bottom of the cube at the start of the final layer I only get one side missing, whereas I usually I only have 2 or 4. It's confusing me so much, help please?
Joeseffel 1 week ago
@Joeseffel That's parity. Use parity algorithm 2 with the wrong edge right in front of you and it's on the top layer. Just watch the video to know what I mean.
VagrantWatcher213 1 week ago
@VagrantWatcher213 Thanks man, I was under the impression parity only occurred at the final step so I never would have tried that.
Joeseffel 1 week ago
8:41 F*** u
lucasdkristensen 1 week ago
Got my first 4x4x4 yesterday and can already solve it thanks to these unreal videos.
gorgeousbob9694 1 week ago
i never end up with parity number 1 or 4
starfox2819 1 week ago
I get fucking writing's cramp when working with this thing, especially when solving the corner-pieces (in-before the Allan-algorithm). Solving my 3x3 feels like rubbing oil on a baby's arse in comparison.
Orthinology 1 week ago
Long, beastly, horrific, awful, terrible, stinky algorithms. :D
Alphonsus001 1 week ago
lol fu 8.45
123Grimmie 1 week ago
8:30 in this video i was offended he told me F U so many times!
xXxSaveXTheXRavexXx 1 week ago
@accentmark5 just watch him do it and follow what he does exactly. If you still fail you must have done something wrong...
pigsinspace07 1 week ago
@pigsinspace07 Thanks!
accentmark5 20 hours ago
I wrote down parity algorithm 1, and I'm pretty sure I wrote it down correctly. But when I try to do it, I mess up. What should I do?
accentmark5 1 week ago
I just messed up one of the last algorithms restarted and GOT IT!!! Only took my a year..
Weeiwei 2 weeks ago
I found a shorter version of his "Magic Algorithm":
R' F D' F'
TheDesertProductions 2 weeks ago
i have all the middle pieces solved but 2, i do not have any unsolved pieces on the top layer, cant get it... :S
kaidi345 2 weeks ago
at the end of the solving i got everything except the 8 corner pieces were in the right spots but not in the right position. Please help
iurocks1000 2 weeks ago
@iurocks1000 I have the exact same thing. The only thing i can think of, is unscrambling, and re solving it. :(
xxxsaradominrulezxxx 2 weeks ago
omg!!! there is a spider attacking the rubiks!:o
NicklasMartinHansen 2 weeks ago
please help: at 3:40 you give an algorithm for when the 4 remaining pieces are directly across from each other however im stuck when i have only the 4 unsolved left but their kitty corner and I dont know what to do to solve it. thanks for the help in advance. can u PM it to me.
TyTyTyBoy 2 weeks ago
@TyTyTyBoy When the four remaining peices are kitty corner, you'll want to hold those pices in front, and do the algorithm, R' F D' F', then they should be directly across from each other. Then you can do D* R F' U R' F D'*.
Sorry for two comments in a row both by me.
TheDesertProductions 2 weeks ago 5
For when the pieces on the side are kitty corner you can just do this algorithm. F, U, F inverted, L.
PlutonicHat25 2 weeks ago
srry typo its R, U`, B`, 2R ( srry my prime key on my keybord doesnt work right )
orangeunicorn2009 2 weeks ago
when two edge pieces are across from each other rather than kiddy-corner there is a faster algorithum that is a little less difficult to remember its : R, U`, B, 2R
orangeunicorn2009 2 weeks ago
the awkward momment when the 2 top comments are the same
orangeunicorn2009 2 weeks ago
Learned how to solve this within only a few days, thanks to you! :'-)
x3marianneee 2 weeks ago
for some reason my 3x3x3 looks like a tiny child now...
orangeunicorn2009 2 weeks ago 44
F....you...F...you, am i the only 1 feeling insuleted ?
menotspeakenglish 3 weeks ago
@menotspeakenglish you sure are my friend
xXhallwayXx 3 weeks ago
@menotspeakenglish i was just thinking the same thing lol
orangeunicorn2009 2 weeks ago
what do i do when i have only two inside wedges left that are unsolved? i can't seem to get them solved without messing up another wedge.
IchyBumsSuc 3 weeks ago
ah 4:53. the moment I've been waiting for. :)
habel7892 3 weeks ago
i ended up with two parody cases what do you do in that situation?
thejudz1 3 weeks ago
@thejudz1 You do each parity case one at a time. I just had the same thing occur. I did each at a time and it turned out solved in the end.
tr0uble192 3 weeks ago
what do you mean its a scrambled 3x3x3 rubiks cube?
thejudz1 3 weeks ago
@thejudz1 You can solve it like a 3x3 cube.
tr0uble192 3 weeks ago
the 4x4x4 is to hard
GDM240295 3 weeks ago
is it possible for 2 parity cases to appear?? because that's what i have -.-
KrloOs1000 3 weeks ago
@KrloOs1000 yes it happens; it means you have to do both algorithms -.-
TheMrbrayn 3 weeks ago
I got first parity. IM DOOMED!!!!!!!!!!!!
EstJazzJ 3 weeks ago
the algrorithms don't work for me. Atleast the second one. It fucks up everything :( Please help
toiletpaeperguy 3 weeks ago
I've moved on to the 5x5x5 and you don't have tutorials for that! =[
dizzylou330 3 weeks ago
is it possible to get more than one parity error? i don't know if i'm doing it wrong or if that can happen
toiletpaeperguy 3 weeks ago
at the very beginning of parity case #1 shouldn't it be 2U* and then 2L'* instead of 2L*?
CHIKNfluxx 3 weeks ago
Is it possible to get 2 parity cases at the same time ? Because just like jaxnRds i can`t form a cross on the top layer so i thought i solve it without making the cross but at the right place, but now the corner pieces wont get in place either... am i doing something terribly wrong or do i just got very bad luck and in any case how do i fix it ? Please help
kingcool6 3 weeks ago
@kingcool6 It is possible to have more than one parity case. It has happend to me before. This is somthing that to me dosn't happend occasonly but when it does happen, you could get multiple partty cases or the same case multiple times.
911devel 3 weeks ago
@911devel ok thx,another question, at the end when i are suppose to get the corner pieces right, i got them on right place but it seems you cant use the normal algoritm Ri Di R D cuz then you screw the rest of the cube up, how do i solve that ?
kingcool6 3 weeks ago
@kingcool6 I'm not completely sure. I'll have to get back to you on that question. My guess is that maybe trying the algorithm for parody case 1 or 4.
911devel 3 weeks ago
@911devel Nevermind i figured it out :D Thx anyways
kingcool6 3 weeks ago
@TheRussianPT i got 1 for x-mas too but my record is 1:10 good job bro!
L1ghtjak4L1fe 3 weeks ago
Note: I do NOT align all the centerpieces at the beginning. This is to avoid parity.
TheSAsylum 3 weeks ago
I'm currently working on a 4x4x4 layer-by-layer solve,but as of now, I'm stuck on the forth layer. Could you help me out here?
Trying to figure out how to switch the middle (not center) pieces on the top layer to lign them up, but nothing I do seems to work. Appreciate every suggestion you have! Or I'd be glad if you could post a private video with just the 4th layer solve.
/The Swedish Asylum
TheSAsylum 3 weeks ago
I have a problem, PLEASE HELP! When I'm solving my 4x4 like a 3x3 I end up stumbling onto a predicament. When I'm doing the algorithm: F, R, U, R', U', F'. I can't get the colors of the top layer to form a cross on the top. Any help? :/
JaxnRdS 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
Mazentius 3 weeks ago
@JaxnRdS You have stumbled onto parity number 3. Just follow the instructions at that point and you will have it.
Mazentius 3 weeks ago
yay in my solve i got no parity :)
samdom223 3 weeks ago
okay, i have a problem... i can get it completely solved except for one little corner which is flipped around... i try solving it like the normal 3x3x3 way, but it just mixes it up... i cannot figure out what im doing wrong, and when i tried mixing it up and doing it again, it didn't work either...
PartieHard52 4 weeks ago
WTF is with all these porn suggestions?????
GhostMushrooms 4 weeks ago 38
@GhostMushrooms i no aye
rAv9898 3 weeks ago
@rAv9898 the muslims here are offended....
GhostMushrooms 3 weeks ago
@GhostMushrooms i thought i'd let you know you have the top comment
orangeunicorn2009 2 weeks ago
@orangeunicorn2009 yeah thanks they should make a system in which you will be notified if your comment is a top comment
GhostMushrooms 2 weeks ago
@GhostMushrooms I've thought of that so many times...
xxxsaradominrulezxxx 2 weeks ago
@xxxsaradominrulezxxx me too
GhostMushrooms 2 weeks ago
i lost you@ 3:16
Michaelscoots2 1 month ago
Comment removed
Run4runes 1 month ago
I cant solve the third layer! someone help!
malikowski72596 1 month ago
at 2:10 you dont need to do the algorithm, you can just turn left or right side 180 degreeds ( sorry for my bad english ) and then you just turn them so they will be on bar and to the thing
TheMrDrakth 1 month ago
@TheMrDrakth english was not bad at all
TonyCangro 1 month ago
Comment removed
Gabri3773 1 month ago
I am finished with the centers and the middle pieces are lined up so it is basically like an unscrambled 3x3x3 and when I try to solve it like the original, none of the corners match up. Did I do something wrong?
kight1994 1 month ago
@kight1994 When you get to that point, assure that you have a corner piece in it's correct spot. Say you wanted to solve an orange/green/yellow piece. Make sure that you have the orange and yellow and green corner piece in the correct location -- next to the the orange, yellow or green side. Then do the Ri Di R D algorithm.
tr0uble192 1 month ago
@kight1994 I have the same problem. I have it all set up to solve like a 3x3x3, but then the corners are flipped when I put them in the right spot.
BrittanysMusicVideos 4 weeks ago
I solved it! :D
Browerchick 1 month ago
Hey buddy, I’m about to go on a very long trip across country. The problem I’m running into is that the video will not let me play it on my iPhone. Please allow playback on iPhones so I can solve this crazy a** cube. Thanks
TheTowerjumper90 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
when you line it up do you have to solve them?
coolkidowen214 1 month ago
What's up w/ the suggestions?
EAGangstad 1 month ago 2
Wait. . . what was the point of the L', R?
EAGangstad 1 month ago
It's been long enough, when shall you teach us how to solve the professor?
l0s0all 1 month ago
@l0s0all 5x5 is pretty much the same. centers, edges, fix parity, solve like a 3x3.
Dynikus 1 month ago
I had PARITY CASE number 2 and i am not very happy that they are 5 cases with 2 of them with more than 20 moves and i bought 5x5x5 and 6x6x6...
vankataable 1 month ago
RobHO629's videos are slightly better,
Good Job Though!
glenjacobs423 1 month ago
what do you do when there are two 2x1 colours left and you cant move it without splitting up another one?
TheOldDin 1 month ago
I have learned the most about how to solve the 4x4x4 rubiks cube parity cases from you. I have been from video to video and yours is the only one that i actually learned from. Thank you so much for making this video:)
Justin48Bieber 1 month ago in playlist More faves!!!
Now, what part of my brain is supposed to remember Parity Algorithms can anyone tell me?
EstJazzJ 1 month ago
6:35- i started crying
wolfandzero 1 month ago
thanks your video helped me:D
SaltySeaDawg171 1 month ago
Dude - your number 3 "magic" algorithm is lame. You can do a number of intuitive moves or simply R' F D' to get them across from each other.
satilu42 1 month ago
Sometimes when i start solving the cube like it was a 3x3x3 i finish 3 layers and when i am trying to get the cross on the top i can't because the patern is wrong. Anyone else have the same problem?
PYROjoSH09 1 month ago
@PYROjoSH09: Parity problem - you have an odd number of edges inverted. Need to learn parity algorithms.
satilu42 1 month ago
This guy sounds just like the guy from the show Cash Cab.
omgimanalien 1 month ago
Got a 4x4x4 took the better part of 2 hours to solve.
Mazentius 1 month ago
Dude, for parity case #3 I got the EXACT same two pieces switched as you O_o
ShadowthePast 1 month ago
I got a 4x4x4 for Christmas....but I got the centers wrong :( *starts over*
obtusepothole 1 month ago
@obtusepothole Me too!
HowToWinGames 1 month ago
4x4x4 just needs to fuck off tbh
dzef07 1 month ago
can u make a video n how to solve a 5 by 5 cube please
sammy101798 1 month ago
Dan, your 3x3 videos were excellent, but this one is just a mess. I am completly stuck on trying to figure out the pairs. Everytime I move one, the other one gets out of place. "Moving an unsolved one there and a solved one here and turning it" doesn't help.
Midknight227 1 month ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Ok dude. I have 2 unsolved edge sets, but they're diagonal. What do I do?
superbarukun 1 month ago
Ok dude. I have 2 unsolved edge sets, but they're diagonal. What do I do?
superbarukun 1 month ago
my cristmas present was a 4x4x4! now i can solve it! thanks! you were the one who thought me 3x3x3 and my record is 36 seconds!!!!
TheRussianPT 1 month ago 44
@TheRussianPT i got mine for christmas too ! :D
sammy101798 1 month ago
@TheRussianPT lol my record for the 3x3x3 is 2:59
Mrgabi1239 3 weeks ago
@Mrgabi1239 when i first started the 3x3x3 my record was 3 min :P now 36 seconds :D
TheRussianPT 3 weeks ago
@TheRussianPT when i started with 3x3x3 my record was 4:46
Mrgabi1239 3 weeks ago
@Mrgabi1239 keep training and see other ways of doing it faster :D
TheRussianPT 3 weeks ago
@TheRussianPT That's is what I'm going to do! I won't give up!
Mrgabi1239 3 weeks ago
i got to 4:00 but now i dont know what to do, can someone help me?
mooveez4U 1 month ago
This is way too hard to follow. You need to make a whole new part 3 to this 4x4x4 series. This one is absolutely terrible. Please make a new one. Everyone can follow everything up to this video. After about two minutes you just start saying, "you have to put this into the solved layer and then you put this there and then this right there to make those two good". That makes no sense even with the visual aid of the video.
TechnoWarfare 1 month ago 2
IM finding it HARD!
portalpalful 1 month ago
@portalpalful do u know how to solve a normal rubiks cube because if u dont thats why ur finding this so hard
sammy101798 1 month ago
im trying to solve it
portalpalful 1 month ago
why are there porn vids on the related vids side of the the youtube page ?!?!
hydropuncher 1 month ago
@hydropuncher because he is a pornstar
MrAkshay6000 1 month ago
09:58-10:00 Sexy spider :D
SuperEternalSunshine 1 month ago
I solved it. dunno how but ._.
phleXcss 1 month ago
what he means when he said solve it like a 3x3 means u have to make a cross ? then the corners ? then f2l ? oll then pll ?
cookiesleague 1 month ago
Does anyone know anything really good to put in a 4x4x4 cube? on my 3x3x3 i used Vasoline which helped a lot, but not so much on my 4x4x4.
jawbreak1r 1 month ago
Stuck on parity case 01 cubits are in the correct place but they are flipped?
creativefish77 1 month ago
why is there so much fake porn in the right Tab?
Zarrykotter 1 month ago 3
for me this is kinda easy :D now i want to buy a 4x4x4 rubiks cube , guys he has faith in you hahah so learn it
cookiesleague 1 month ago
im scared to try to finish this in case a parity comes up O.O
drummer9859 1 month ago
FU, FU, FU
rubik0912 1 month ago 31
He made this one so confuzzling!!!!
laxattaxable 1 month ago
I just got TWO parity errors in one go >_<
greenday61892 1 month ago
0:24 I'm HIV Positive!!!!!!
LolTechTutorials 1 month ago
Comment removed
LolTechTutorials 1 month ago
my corners are all flip flop ,like i have finish the green top and the cross is made but for like the orange and yellow corner orange is on yellow side and yellow and is orange side but the green being on top is in the right spot i don't know if the person who gave the cube for free fudged up all the corners before hand or if this is a actual problem with solving the cube also this has happen with each corner being on the wrong side but the main top color being all right
HEADSH0T754 1 month ago
@HEADSH0T754 maybe you positioned the sides wrong when you made all the middle pieces.
rathmiron 1 month ago
i don't no how ti gigi wit that
??
djivek99 1 month ago
with the fifth parity algorithm, does it matter how you hold it?
rathmiron 1 month ago
ur so awsome helped me out alot! lol and funny
emoangle16 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
f uuuu You make no sense!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
dimuell6 1 month ago
Comment removed
dimuell6 1 month ago
he said FU o.o
MrsKyoshiro 1 month ago
whoever made the parities algrithms is really crazy mad smart
ani98mesh 1 month ago
I just thought about this. If you want a 2x2x2 rubiks cube you could use the 4x4x4 as a 2x2x2. You just have to have the 4x4x4 solved.
Numba1SouthParkFan 1 month ago
@Numba1SouthParkFan 2x2's go diagonal though....
MrTurtleSlap 1 month ago
You don't know how to teach. never make how to videos fake
4everRebano 1 month ago
@pogobat can youu pleeaseee make a tutorial for the 5x5 your tutorials are the best
GaTohacks 1 month ago
@GaTohacks 5x5 is essentially just like the 4x4, except for the fact that you need to solve three layer centers and edges instead of two. You really don't need a tutorial for it. If you don't trust your intuition, try MeMyselfandPi. He has tutorials for everything, though I warn you of his voice.
Celespiano 1 month ago
Thanks so much, this really helped, especially with the parity cases.
Arsenalr00l 1 month ago
Did yiu know that in parity case #2, if you do the little r's and l's instead of the r*'s and l*'s, youll solve the cube faster
GREYBLAZE800 1 month ago
I payed attention till I got to the parities. FUUUUUUUUUU-
DGregster 1 month ago
actually, u only need to remember 2 parity algorithm and one is ezy to remember (The shortest one). The other is the front flipped one. Its because the swapped diagonal pieces are caused by the misaligned "True" centre corner piece which causes the diagonal pieces to appear "Wrong" and by using the 3rd (or 5th) parity algorithm u will solve it (I tried it works every time!) so technically there is only 5 algorithms to remember for 4x4 and requirese 3x3 prerequisites haha
DunNotCome 1 month ago
i have a parity case where its like 7:40 but insted of 2 wrong i have 3 wrong =/
TheCirrus45 1 month ago
@TheCirrus45 That means you previously disassembled your cube and it is unsolvable. Either that, or you need to do the algorithm that switches the top corners (L' U R U' L U R') once more
PiTheKhoz 1 month ago
Thanks a million buddy I bought a 4x4x4 an hour and a half ago and I already solved it :D
kaaaamelot 1 month ago
sssssslllllllaaaaaayyyyyyyeeeeeerrrrrr!!!!!!! :D
6SFU 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What if I have multiple parity cases? Which one to do first coz i'll always mess it up.
KarthiLuver 1 month ago
YAYAAYAYAYYAY!!!!! SOOPOOLLLLVVEEED!!!
Megabasty6000 2 months ago
GIVE UP ;(
Megabasty6000 2 months ago
when start the top level near the end of solving it one of the two middle paired pieces is upside down and it screws everything up and i can't fix it HELP!! sad face
12345D11 2 months ago
Lol he yawns at 2:12
MrBarryThor 2 months ago
@pogobat i noticed that the solve for parity case 2 gave you parity case 3. haha solve it like normal...nope! you got us it becomes parity case 2. Good save though solving the problem you hoped people didn't notice in parity case 2 in parity case 3.
ransing3113 2 months ago
parity case no.5 doesn't work lol
ste13G 2 months ago
fuckity fuck fuck fuck! GOD DAMN TOP CROSS PARITY MOTHER FUCKERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
TheRyanpatton 2 months ago
SOMEBODY HELPP PLEASEEE!!!!!!!!!!!
Ok so normally i start with the black(white) face and when i get to the yellow it always comes out wrong and i cannot solve it it will always come as a T shape when i need it to come out as a strait line or a right angle
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ThePhnx21 2 months ago
@ThePhnx21 well if it keeps doin that . well have you ever took your cube apart if you have thats probably the reason you then put it back wrong ur just doin it wrong hopefully it helps
YOUJUSTGOTTROLLED1 2 months ago
@YOUJUSTGOTTROLLED1 I have never taken it apart and dont even know how to lol
ThePhnx21 2 months ago
@ThePhnx21 It's a parity case. Just pretend that it's flipped the right way and continue to solve as normal, then they will be the only two the wrong way at the end. That's where you need the 2nd parity algorithm and after that it should be solved.
cabbask8freak 2 months ago