Added: 4 years ago
From: 23456D
Views: 2,432
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Be sure to check out Dr. Judy Wood's research before you decide.

  • i havent read anyones comments. i am an electrician after having a quick look at how the buildings fell.... i knew straight away that the buildings fell straight into the most resistance. if anyone here is a sparky they would know how lazy nature really is, e.g the flow of electrons - path of least resistance.

  • 650+ Architects & Engineers demand real investigation into 9/11:

    AE911Truth (dot) org

    911Blogger (dot) com

    Infowars (dot) com

  • This guy does not know shit about structral design

  • controlled demolition =/

  • Dylan looks like he just woke up.lol

  • I am also an engineer, working to attain my masters degree. And my opinion is that the dynamics that rule such an incident are very complex. So it is kind of irresponsible to say you understand what happened just by looking some videos. Degrees must not be used to back up incomplete data, that cheapens your degree and also the profession.

  • and do you believe that a local fire caused the buildings to fall?

  • If you put it like that, I think it is a possibility that heat ruined the structure, temperature variations cause very interesting effects in materials. I have seen steel break like glass when frozen. I think the same happens when you heat it up. There are tables with ratios how much strength you loose per Kelvin. And when you add the detail that a plane struck the building But the truth is I do not really understand how it happened. Dynamics in collisions are very complex.

  • ok. lets say the steel was bending- would that cause the building to fall in 10 seconds and shred it to dust? wouldn't it just bend?

    or just cause a local collapse?I'm not an engineer,I've never passed one course in science- but I see a building being demolished, and the lower floors giving in before the top floors fell.

    Look at the fire caused by the planes; doesn't black smoke mean that the fire is dying out?

    aren't these buildings meant to withhold the impact of a crash??

    what do you think?

  • You are an Engineer, and you THINK steel becomes brittle when heat is applied. Where on Earth did you Qualify?

  • Haha sh**t you are right. The way I wrote it can be interpreted as steel becoming brittle when heat applied. Sorry. But if you go to the next sentence you can catch what I was trying to say, steel strength goes away as heat is applied. Sorry, my English sucks, I know.

  • the wing of the 2nd plane was visible from my angle-- it came in from the opposite side, the Wall St. side, not the Chambers side.

  • "can you with honestly tell me that you were looking at the twin towers at the exact moment ..."

    not the first, the second. i was on Chambers St. walking to class downtown from the 2 train. the WTC was visible and people were gathering. i didn't go to class and I hung on the street till a few minutes after 9.

  • is the hispanic guy talking the actual engineer or the truther? i ask because it seems like the white guy is totally just letting him rant and that would go to prove nothing at all.

  • k. gonna put this as politely as I can, because I appreciate your presence and comments.

    1. The young man is Italian, not hispanic. it even says so in my "about this video" thing.

    2. he lists his degrees in the video

    3. letting an engineer speak without interruption is "just letting him rant and that would go to prove nothing at all"?

    Please notice you didn't look very closely at this video, didn't read the info attached to it. Is this what you consider critical thinking?

  • "alex jones and dylan avery are frauds!

    they need to expose the truth about tvfakery!

    no planes were hijacked!

    no plane hit those towers!":

    Classic disinformation designed to discredit the 9/11 truth and justice movement.

  • man, you have got to stop saying that. planes hit the buildings. not one of the "tv fakery" theorist lives in NY-- you all werent there man. I WAS, and my eyesight is fine. Planes hit the buildings. Enough crap already.

  • can you with honestly tell me that you were looking at the twin towers at the exact moment those those planes were to have hit that day...with absolute certainty? because us human beings have that uncanny ability to recreate history according to what we want to believe is the truth.

  • It's not hard to discredit the Troof movement, Dylan Avery has done it himself.

  • alex jones and dylan avery are frauds!

    they need to expose the truth about tvfakery!

    no planes were hijacked!

    no plane hit those towers!

  • /watch?v=FVikLwtEi_c

    this video is the diving plane, it takes about 7 seconds to dive and disappear behind the tower.

    now watch this, this is from cnn, we all seen these.

    /watch?v=5Afcd-51uOM

    it flys straight for almost 7 seconds.

    you cant have a diving plane and a straight plane. so, how many planes hit the second tower??????

    its that simple. are you people convinced yet? or are you people stupid?

  • what is this guy saying? come on i went to italy and learned italian in like a month...whatever, judge not lest ye be judged, even though jesus is just a metaphor for the sun...

  • What a dumbass. He must be sucking face with Bush!!

  • Interesting video.

    For more information about what architects and structural engineers are saying about 911 please visit.

    OPEN UP THE INVESTIGATION

    ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS

    FOR 9/11 TRUTH

    ae911truth org

  • He is lying about his qualifications.

  • The floors above the impact zones didn't collapse at first because they wern't structurally damaged. Makes sense to me. Pilots tilted wings intentionally to damage as many floors as impossible. 2nd tower hit fell first because impact zone had to support more lbs., something like 200 million lbs. I think.

  • '..as possible..'- I meant to say.

  • According to measurements from two separete seismic measuring stations, the towers fell in 8 seconds and 11 seconds respectively. Meaning 10 floors worth of trusses, core columns, exterior columns, bolts and welds all failed each second over 80-90 intact stories. Even the 911 Commission report corroborated these collapse figures. You do realize how preposterous that sounds don't you?

  • If the exterior damage and minor interior damage was enough to undermine the structures integrity, don't you think the building would have collapsed immediately, as the Italian gent suggests? Or given said damage was largely restricted to one corner, the top would have just snapped off?

  • I was right next to the camera person for this interview and spoke with him beforehand...he is dead on RIGHT. He has credientials that make his rough analysis indisputible based on the law of physics.Thanks for posting! classic truth.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more