i havent read anyones comments. i am an electrician after having a quick look at how the buildings fell.... i knew straight away that the buildings fell straight into the most resistance. if anyone here is a sparky they would know how lazy nature really is, e.g the flow of electrons - path of least resistance.
I am also an engineer, working to attain my masters degree. And my opinion is that the dynamics that rule such an incident are very complex. So it is kind of irresponsible to say you understand what happened just by looking some videos. Degrees must not be used to back up incomplete data, that cheapens your degree and also the profession.
If you put it like that, I think it is a possibility that heat ruined the structure, temperature variations cause very interesting effects in materials. I have seen steel break like glass when frozen. I think the same happens when you heat it up. There are tables with ratios how much strength you loose per Kelvin. And when you add the detail that a plane struck the building But the truth is I do not really understand how it happened. Dynamics in collisions are very complex.
ok. lets say the steel was bending- would that cause the building to fall in 10 seconds and shred it to dust? wouldn't it just bend?
or just cause a local collapse?I'm not an engineer,I've never passed one course in science- but I see a building being demolished, and the lower floors giving in before the top floors fell.
Look at the fire caused by the planes; doesn't black smoke mean that the fire is dying out?
aren't these buildings meant to withhold the impact of a crash??
Haha sh**t you are right. The way I wrote it can be interpreted as steel becoming brittle when heat applied. Sorry. But if you go to the next sentence you can catch what I was trying to say, steel strength goes away as heat is applied. Sorry, my English sucks, I know.
"can you with honestly tell me that you were looking at the twin towers at the exact moment ..."
not the first, the second. i was on Chambers St. walking to class downtown from the 2 train. the WTC was visible and people were gathering. i didn't go to class and I hung on the street till a few minutes after 9.
is the hispanic guy talking the actual engineer or the truther? i ask because it seems like the white guy is totally just letting him rant and that would go to prove nothing at all.
man, you have got to stop saying that. planes hit the buildings. not one of the "tv fakery" theorist lives in NY-- you all werent there man. I WAS, and my eyesight is fine. Planes hit the buildings. Enough crap already.
can you with honestly tell me that you were looking at the twin towers at the exact moment those those planes were to have hit that day...with absolute certainty? because us human beings have that uncanny ability to recreate history according to what we want to believe is the truth.
what is this guy saying? come on i went to italy and learned italian in like a month...whatever, judge not lest ye be judged, even though jesus is just a metaphor for the sun...
The floors above the impact zones didn't collapse at first because they wern't structurally damaged. Makes sense to me. Pilots tilted wings intentionally to damage as many floors as impossible. 2nd tower hit fell first because impact zone had to support more lbs., something like 200 million lbs. I think.
According to measurements from two separete seismic measuring stations, the towers fell in 8 seconds and 11 seconds respectively. Meaning 10 floors worth of trusses, core columns, exterior columns, bolts and welds all failed each second over 80-90 intact stories. Even the 911 Commission report corroborated these collapse figures. You do realize how preposterous that sounds don't you?
If the exterior damage and minor interior damage was enough to undermine the structures integrity, don't you think the building would have collapsed immediately, as the Italian gent suggests? Or given said damage was largely restricted to one corner, the top would have just snapped off?
I was right next to the camera person for this interview and spoke with him beforehand...he is dead on RIGHT. He has credientials that make his rough analysis indisputible based on the law of physics.Thanks for posting! classic truth.
Be sure to check out Dr. Judy Wood's research before you decide.
CathyFromPensacola 1 year ago
i havent read anyones comments. i am an electrician after having a quick look at how the buildings fell.... i knew straight away that the buildings fell straight into the most resistance. if anyone here is a sparky they would know how lazy nature really is, e.g the flow of electrons - path of least resistance.
Audi2000t 2 years ago
650+ Architects & Engineers demand real investigation into 9/11:
AE911Truth (dot) org
911Blogger (dot) com
Infowars (dot) com
bofors7715 2 years ago
This guy does not know shit about structral design
JLOU045 2 years ago
controlled demolition =/
GalaxySk8Punk 3 years ago
Dylan looks like he just woke up.lol
F1RE2WATER 3 years ago
I am also an engineer, working to attain my masters degree. And my opinion is that the dynamics that rule such an incident are very complex. So it is kind of irresponsible to say you understand what happened just by looking some videos. Degrees must not be used to back up incomplete data, that cheapens your degree and also the profession.
ldklf 3 years ago
and do you believe that a local fire caused the buildings to fall?
sahar091 3 years ago
If you put it like that, I think it is a possibility that heat ruined the structure, temperature variations cause very interesting effects in materials. I have seen steel break like glass when frozen. I think the same happens when you heat it up. There are tables with ratios how much strength you loose per Kelvin. And when you add the detail that a plane struck the building But the truth is I do not really understand how it happened. Dynamics in collisions are very complex.
ldklf 3 years ago
ok. lets say the steel was bending- would that cause the building to fall in 10 seconds and shred it to dust? wouldn't it just bend?
or just cause a local collapse?I'm not an engineer,I've never passed one course in science- but I see a building being demolished, and the lower floors giving in before the top floors fell.
Look at the fire caused by the planes; doesn't black smoke mean that the fire is dying out?
aren't these buildings meant to withhold the impact of a crash??
what do you think?
sahar091 3 years ago
You are an Engineer, and you THINK steel becomes brittle when heat is applied. Where on Earth did you Qualify?
sirzooky 3 years ago
Haha sh**t you are right. The way I wrote it can be interpreted as steel becoming brittle when heat applied. Sorry. But if you go to the next sentence you can catch what I was trying to say, steel strength goes away as heat is applied. Sorry, my English sucks, I know.
ldklf 3 years ago
the wing of the 2nd plane was visible from my angle-- it came in from the opposite side, the Wall St. side, not the Chambers side.
lazarus0202 4 years ago
"can you with honestly tell me that you were looking at the twin towers at the exact moment ..."
not the first, the second. i was on Chambers St. walking to class downtown from the 2 train. the WTC was visible and people were gathering. i didn't go to class and I hung on the street till a few minutes after 9.
lazarus0202 4 years ago
is the hispanic guy talking the actual engineer or the truther? i ask because it seems like the white guy is totally just letting him rant and that would go to prove nothing at all.
RoseWhiteRoseRed 4 years ago
k. gonna put this as politely as I can, because I appreciate your presence and comments.
1. The young man is Italian, not hispanic. it even says so in my "about this video" thing.
2. he lists his degrees in the video
3. letting an engineer speak without interruption is "just letting him rant and that would go to prove nothing at all"?
Please notice you didn't look very closely at this video, didn't read the info attached to it. Is this what you consider critical thinking?
23456D 4 years ago
"alex jones and dylan avery are frauds!
they need to expose the truth about tvfakery!
no planes were hijacked!
no plane hit those towers!":
Classic disinformation designed to discredit the 9/11 truth and justice movement.
thunderwalk78 4 years ago
man, you have got to stop saying that. planes hit the buildings. not one of the "tv fakery" theorist lives in NY-- you all werent there man. I WAS, and my eyesight is fine. Planes hit the buildings. Enough crap already.
lazarus0202 4 years ago
can you with honestly tell me that you were looking at the twin towers at the exact moment those those planes were to have hit that day...with absolute certainty? because us human beings have that uncanny ability to recreate history according to what we want to believe is the truth.
RoseWhiteRoseRed 4 years ago
It's not hard to discredit the Troof movement, Dylan Avery has done it himself.
streakingcameraman 3 years ago
alex jones and dylan avery are frauds!
they need to expose the truth about tvfakery!
no planes were hijacked!
no plane hit those towers!
chibangin007 4 years ago
/watch?v=FVikLwtEi_c
this video is the diving plane, it takes about 7 seconds to dive and disappear behind the tower.
now watch this, this is from cnn, we all seen these.
/watch?v=5Afcd-51uOM
it flys straight for almost 7 seconds.
you cant have a diving plane and a straight plane. so, how many planes hit the second tower??????
its that simple. are you people convinced yet? or are you people stupid?
chibangin007 4 years ago
what is this guy saying? come on i went to italy and learned italian in like a month...whatever, judge not lest ye be judged, even though jesus is just a metaphor for the sun...
photofu 4 years ago
What a dumbass. He must be sucking face with Bush!!
mustafaopw 4 years ago
Interesting video.
For more information about what architects and structural engineers are saying about 911 please visit.
OPEN UP THE INVESTIGATION
ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS
FOR 9/11 TRUTH
ae911truth org
TyroneSandalphon 4 years ago
He is lying about his qualifications.
jizzmonger 4 years ago
The floors above the impact zones didn't collapse at first because they wern't structurally damaged. Makes sense to me. Pilots tilted wings intentionally to damage as many floors as impossible. 2nd tower hit fell first because impact zone had to support more lbs., something like 200 million lbs. I think.
theSouliLLUSION 4 years ago
'..as possible..'- I meant to say.
theSouliLLUSION 4 years ago
According to measurements from two separete seismic measuring stations, the towers fell in 8 seconds and 11 seconds respectively. Meaning 10 floors worth of trusses, core columns, exterior columns, bolts and welds all failed each second over 80-90 intact stories. Even the 911 Commission report corroborated these collapse figures. You do realize how preposterous that sounds don't you?
theCharmingDeviant 4 years ago
If the exterior damage and minor interior damage was enough to undermine the structures integrity, don't you think the building would have collapsed immediately, as the Italian gent suggests? Or given said damage was largely restricted to one corner, the top would have just snapped off?
theCharmingDeviant 4 years ago
I was right next to the camera person for this interview and spoke with him beforehand...he is dead on RIGHT. He has credientials that make his rough analysis indisputible based on the law of physics.Thanks for posting! classic truth.
clovercouple 4 years ago 3