Added: 5 years ago
From: Rohnner
Views: 38,313
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (67)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • muy bueno exelente saludos de uruguay oss...

  • do these techniques break arms because i want to try them but it lloks like their like twisting his arm all over the place

  • sehr schönes Video Grüße eines 4.Kyu-Trägers aus München xD

  • this guy is chuck norris, right?? LOOOL

  • ketsan (5 days ago) Show Hide

    Marked as spam

    Reply | Spam

    We teach that in a real fight if you were on the bottom you wouldn't be alive long enough to do anything.

    ketsan (5 days ago) Show Hide 0

    Marked as spam

    Reply | Spam

    Muay Thai? Are people still doing that? What do you do that for? Strikers are just take down practice. BJJ has standing techniques, use those. Thai boxing is pointless.

    LMFAO thinks I am referring to Tae Bo with Billy Blanks. HAHAHA

  • Thai boxing is about as effective as level of BJJ knowledge the thai boxer has. On its own it's a relic, the only reason it still exists is because fighters still prefer to fight with striking techniques, it gratifies their ego more.

  • I understand what you're saying, it's just fallible knowledge. I think you meant Thai boxers are as effective as their ability to defend takedowns, which is more reasonable. for example the axe murderer wasn't that experience in bjj when he first started beating top fighters and ground specialist such as Kazushi Sakuraba and sending them to the hospital. And chuck liddell albeit a kickboxer, was not experienced in bjj when he beat the top fighters in the world all b/c he defended takedowns well.

  • If a bjj artist is unable to take a striker down like the iceman or cro cop, then their bjj is ineffective.Cro Cop, who had no ground experience was able to knock out the top heavyweights in the world by defending takedowns and striking until a bjj artist who HAD GOOD WRESTLING AS WELL, was able to take him down and use bjj to submit him. (referring to big NOG for those that don'tknow) So what did we learn, A striker is as effective as their ability to defend takedowns AND their bjj not one

  • @ketsan i smell a bias

  • what a sad conclusion you came to "if you find yourself on the bottom you wont be alive long enough to do anything" that shows you have no confidence in yourself and have a very hopeless and pessimistic attitude toward hand to hand combat. So if you find yourself in a one on one confrontation and find yourself on the bottom, aikido teaches you will die? because i use to think aikido was useless but now after you explained the philosophy of giving up and accepting death i know it is. good luck

  • I can't fight multiple attackers on my back or on top for that matter and 1 v 1 my only worry is bjjers and the chances of getting randomly attacked by a Bjjer are practically nil.

  • why waste time learning any art when we can just learn the death touch?

  • If you can do the death touch you understand. If you cannot do the death touch it is impossible to understand. LMAO.

  • "the chances of getting randomly attacked by a Bjjer are practically nil"

    so instead of preparing properly you just accept that you will lose if a bjj practitioner attacks you.

  • I didn't say I wasn't prepared for it.

  • Prepared to give up and die right? Because anyone who winds up on the bottom wont be able to do anything. Your making so much sense now. I'm telling you someone like you should just learn the death touch it seems like your only hope because you are so hopeless.

  • No just prepared to get REALLY nasty and I'm not talking about eye gouging or biting or anything to do with the nuts.

  • preparing with proper technique not just saying I will get nasty and that is what i'm prepared for. Aikido must be futile if you say your only hope is to get nasty. What about using technique to reverse the position and get into a dominant position of your own. Or you can plan on dying, getting nasty, or running like various answers philosophy you described.

  • Sharp pointly fhings work better than technique. This aint the UFC.

  • guns work better than "sharp pointly" things what is your point

  • My point? Next time you're rolling, imagine your opponent is armed.

  • I will train how I deem is necessary but your comment lacks an important detail which is armed with what because if it was a gun, people would react far differently that if it was a baseball bat. and if i did "pretend" it wouldn't be effective.They have special equipment so you don't have to "pretend" ie rubber knives and body padding so you can use a decent amount of resistance while trying to attack or disarm an opponent. But like a said different weapons cause for different technique + equip

  • hey guyz i live in pakistan & i've done tae kwon do & now doing kick boxing but i wanna know where can i learn akido? i mean which is the best country where i should go to learn akido?

  • the one guy looks norris lol

  • go to ure nearest dojo practice aikido for like 4- 5 years and the come back and tell me aikido isnt effective ^^ (make sure its not a ki-aikido dojo!)

  • hey i live in pakistan & i've done tae kwon do & now doing kick boxing but i wanna know where can i learn akido? i mean would u please suggest which is the best country or place where i should go to learn akido?

  • great video.

  • Is that Metallica?

    But I have an other quéstion?

    Aikido looks very interesting... Do you think I should learn it?

  • yes is metalica

    yes you should learn it

  • I'm doing Aikido now, because, there were so must people, who said, that I should do ist and it is so much fun! Someone who never did it should start to do aikido!

  • like pro wrestling moves, it certainly looks cool though...

  • yeh if the guy profoming the attk doesnt it fast the other guy ends up with broken arm so what would be the piont if u see the master sparring they cna do it very fast but it takes time to beable to land properly from a fast attk.

  • The attacks are slow because they are demonstrations. Aikido is a very effective form for self-defense, not attack. That's why LEO, such as myself are encouraged to take it.

  • even if the attacks were fast, it wouldn't make akido an art that works in the real world.

  • wrong!! i think u have never precticed this awesome martial art!

  • Cant slam it til you try it. I made the mistake of challenging someone who was training aikido who went to a gym I went to. It was a friendly 'I'm gunna kick your ass' kind of fight in a controlled environment (gym ring).. but it wasn't much of a fight at all. My years of western boxing and tae-kwon-do didn't do shit for me. The guy was a rookie at best (according to himself), and walked me around the ring in locks that I still haven't learned to do yet.

  • The truth is you are an akido practitioner who has never studied TKD or boxing. I know a BJJ blue belt who smoked an akido black belt over and over, and a boxer would do the same.

  • I have seen a bjj white belt smoke a akido black belt. They don't use full realistic resistance as bjj does, so when faced with a full resisting opponent they are lost. But again if you only know one art bjj is the most superior as we have ALL seen.

  • It's not that, it's that an Aikidoka on the ground, like anyone else, can't use their hips or taisabaki. That's after all the point of going to the ground, to negate these things. Then again a BJJer in a real fight would try to avoid going to the ground himself because we all know what happens in real fights.

  • watch the Gracie in Action series and see how real fights go down

  • Done better than that. I've been in three knife fights, been attacked with broken bottles, clubs, glasses, hammers, been out numbered two or three to one.

    I've seen how real fights go down.

  • If someone who understands grappling or ground technique they would understand it is extremely difficult to stand up without years of drilling that particular position. If Aikido doesn't have very specific techniques for escaping every position on the ground, it is useless. And that goes for Karate and any other form that for some reason acts like they can skip the importance of spending countless hours escaping and attacking from every position on the ground

  • If someone understands stand up grappling they understand that taking a grappler to the ground is easier said than done. Especially when atemi is involved.

  • Anyone that thinks that any of these UFC/MMA style "fights" represent reality has had a VERY sheltered life.

    There's only one effective technique when a real fight goes to the ground and that's to get back up before someone kicks your head in or stabs you. All this ground stuff is all about winnng, in a real fight winning is usually managing to escape, not wannabe heroics like breaking the guys arm with an omoplata, that's ego rather than common sense and ego gets you killed.

  • That's is why I told you ignorant Aikidokas watch the Gracie in Action series because you all want to act like UFC is unrealistic. they get ears bitten off peopl eye gouging trying to kill them and they use bjj to win. These fights are with no weapons but still realistic. People would get stabbed running away just as easy as on the ground so when someone has a weapon there is no "one magical technique" So what does aikido teach if someone gains top mount on you and is pummeling your face?

  • We teach that in a real fight if you were on the bottom you wouldn't be alive long enough to do anything.

    What does BJJ teach about being on top when six people are kicking the fuck out of you?

  • oh ya i forgot about the magical art that allows you to take 6 people at once. better yet learn the death touch. why waste time learning bjj or any art when you can use the death touch? Learn that. And you must be very ignorant not to know what Chute Box is. BJJ and Muay Thai combination is proven to be the most effective in a hand to hand combat situation. So what does karate, tkd, or aikido teach you to escape top mount or back mount? Watch gracie in action series to learn how

  • Yes the magical art called "mobility."

    Proven to be effective in competition and lets not beat around the bush here. BJJ beats Thai boxing. In fact BJJ beats everything 1v1 but a propper self defence situation isn't 1v1 and yes BJJ has stand up techniques, but then so does Aikido.

  • hey i live in pakistan & i've done tae kwon do & now doing kick boxing but i wanna know where can i learn akido? i mean would u please suggest which is the best country or place where i should go to learn akido?

  • don't do it you'll regret wasting years of your life. IT is one of the saddest things i've seen. People spending 20 years on Aikido, then they come to the gym. we put the 4 ounce gloves on and a face protector and they get their ass kicked by someone training Muay Thai and bjj for 6 months and they are just so ashamed and filled with regret. Please start more useful arts like Muay Thai or BJJ. I've seen people really get down on themselves for not doing things correct the first time around

  • Muay Thai? Are people still doing that? What do you do that for? Strikers are just take down practice. BJJ has standing techniques, use those. Thai boxing is pointless.

  • you must never have heard of Vanderlei Silva, shogun rua, or anderson silva and not up to date with current mma. If you need to ask why study muay thai then there is no use to explain anything to you.

  • And how many pure Thai boxers are their in there in MMA?

  • do you seriously need to ask that. I think people stopped going in to mma knowing one art 6, 7 years ago. But you initially asked why learn Muay Thai, and I gave you plenty of examples of people who learned muay thai along with other arts, and have been very effective in the style they use, which is use muay thai, avoid the takedown and if taken down use wrestling and jiu jitsu wrestling and jiu jitsu. To answer your ?, becuase it is most effective martial art when it comes to striking

  • You can ask why learn Muay Thai but if you can't see the benefit of being able to use elbows knees kicks punches and more effectively to attack your opponent then that is your loss. But just like BJJ takes many hours of practice to use in a real situation the same goes for muay thai. For people like you it might seem useless, to spend hours learning but to people who are not as ignorant know the importance

  • Yeah you learn all that then a grappler flattens you before you get a chance to use it. So what's the point?

  • I don't know if you noticed but I am a bjj artist not a striker. I am just realistic in what i view as effective hence i am giving examples and reasons why muay thai is so effective. I wish i would have learned that as i was learning bjj and I am honest about. People who learn aikido let their ego get in the way of admitting they wasted time of their with such an unrealistic art.

  • @ZeGervasio I agree... I think muay thai is a much more effective/realistic martial art... thats why i love muay thai.. its basic yet effective.. unlike Akido where you have to be basically a master to have a chance (no disrespect to akido practitioners).. Thats why you dont see akido in MMA competitions.. because it is extremely unrealistic, and its like the matrix...lol.. what chances do you have to catch a punch coming at you, get a guy in a wristlock, and take him down.. i mean come on...lol

  • you didnt really need to put the 5 basic pins,instead go with the sword play...

  • i like it

  • schön

  • need to be improved

  • cool

  • nice

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more