Added: 2 months ago
From: RealTimeImmersive
Views: 224,734
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (221)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Igual nunca podremos jugarlo ya que esta hecho para el entrenamiento de tropas del ejercito de EE.UU no es para el publico.

  • @IDontHaveMonitor who cares if frostbite looks better or not,stop being an asshole and just enjoy ¬¬....

  • Actually, the foliage and rocks on the ground in BF3 are absolutely horrible.

    Probably the shittiest foliage I've seen in a current gen game apart from GTAIV.

    Honestly. Cryengine easily does the best foliage.

  • Battlefield + Call of Duty + Operation Flashpoint

  • @TheSociety123 You got to be kidding? You compare 3 arcade fun games with a simulation?

  • @minimums7 Not compare but just say those 3 games combined and turn into this alike

  • @TheSociety123 Those 3 games combined would never never never never be like RTI. Theyre all just GAMES with no physics. Its not realistic. There are no realistic games. There are just a few simulations that could be helpful or are helpful.

  • @minimums7 There are realistic games, Dwarf Fortress and the Arma series to name a few examples.

    Both of those examples were designed for entertainment.

  • @Nix6p I am playing ArmA. Yes, arma is realistic and the most realistic game you can get there. But its still not REALISTIC. You know what i mean?

  • There's something wrong with the soldier's animation. It just doesn't feel right...

  • AWWW! None of them got FLC vests! Man! if only they had a few it would be more realistic that way :3

  • of currently available games is the most similar to ARMA 2

  • It's a damn simulation guys. It ain't gonna be playable.

    And I played 240 hours of BF3 in Ultra, and i'm sorry but NO Frotsbite 2 doesn't look better.

    Cryengine is as much if not more beautiful then Frostbite. And it has an editor. DICE fucked a bunch of communities by not releasing a tool for all those clever mod developpers.

    I'm a very big BF fan, but today I'd hope BF was on Cryengine.

  • All I see here is a really well made set of animations, nothing for features at all.

  • The music is ridiculously bad.

  • Movements of people are really stupid.

  • Who know music from this clip?

  • My Call of duty senses are tingling...

  • Comment removed

  • animation sux

  • It's not just another BF3 or MW3. It;s a simulation, to help soldiers - it is suppose to be as real as possible. The most important thing will be AI and rules of the battlefield. But I get it - you're all under 12, and you like multi-ultra-superfast-headshot­s.

  • 57 milionów baksów za ten szajs??? Sniper ghost warrior 2 będzie lepszy

  • BF3

  • STOP COMPARING THIS TO BF3!!! Both of them have good engines and BF3 IS a game but this is not a game. This is a simulator that is supposed to help soldiers. It don't need to have Super Ultra Pro Good graphics but it needs to be a good simulator for soldiers (Gameplay is the most important thing in a ''game'' like that). They get some help even if this simulator has Mario graphics! Sry for my English, but i just wanted to say something.

  • if this is what I have to look forward to for xbox loop and ps4, then I'm not impressed

  • dupy nie urywa

  • @Scisca1a2a

    Człowieku to nie jest gra, tylko symulator.

  • Amazing!

  • I recommend Battlefield 3 !!!

    KKkkkkkkkKkkk

  • grahphics SUCKS!!!

  • @Dant3x1986 Its a training software, graphics arent so important like in video games.

  • 25 terrorist watched this

  • this guys should ask some tips to DICE...

  • next time, use frostbite 2, and frostbite isn't pre-rendered...

  • It isn't pre rendered... this is realtime @LegoAndStarWarsFan

  • - Frostbite 2 = Pre-rendered

    - Cryengine 3 = Real Time.

    Now, will you stop your dumb fight? both are great engines, but the fact that Cryengine 3 is 100% real time makes it much better for simulating real life, knows why? Because real life is not pre-rendered.

  • @bezoro2008 The lighting looks pretty flat and unrealistic in places on this video. Character animation also quite far below the ANT system used on Battlefield 3. When you say 100% real time, what do you mean exactly? Are you saying the sim calculates all lighting in real time using ray tracing or radiosity? If so the results are poor. I know of course it doesn't use real time light. So what else is realtime?

  • Call of Duty using CryEngine 3 would be so epic.

  • @m47h3u55m that would be a waste of power in my opinion. Engine wise.

  • @m47h3u55m Dude, COD is an overrated game for kids, if you are dragging COD into the comment selection on a simulator, then shame on you...

  • Ridley's Scott Black Hawk Down the Game?

  • frostbite 2.0>cryengine3

  • Battlefield 3 looks better.

  • Frostbite 2.0 > every other engine.

  • everyone is comparing this game to MW3 or Battlefield 3 or MGS4. come on really? quit trollin. those games are fairly realistic. theres only so much you can do in modern military themes. this training game is meant to be as realistic as possible.

    personally i hope i get my chance at playing it.

  • On an ipad this would be impressive.

  • Yeah didnt see anything better than mw3 or bf3

  • Fag!

  • like Black Hawk Down movie 0:57

  • Cryengine 3 is so last quarter Frostbite 2 is where its at.

  • i wanna that "game".

  • MGS4

  • 20 miles of warfare in one playable game?

    awesome.

  • So much fucking brown. Look at ARMA 3, its a freaking military simulator, but with lots of color.

  • meh with all the shit ton of money they spent on this they could have at least made it look better than bf3

  • I'm sure this can look much much better with all this technology at their disposal.

  • Frostbite 2.0 looks much much better

  • @iDontHaveMonitor FrostBite is crap for FPS game...

  • @zuloom eeem so far its only for an fps game, namely bf3. hahah idiot.

  • @xivlia yap and it's work like crap... (Dont call random people on internet idiots, it's not nice kid)

  • @iDontHaveMonitor Maybe,but Frostbite is much more newer and it probably doesnt have the same physics scale as CE3

  • @iDontHaveMonitor Too bad its a fake

  • @iDontHaveMonitor u cant be serious, this shits on FB2 back and forth

  • @iDontHaveMonitor But is nowhere near the usefulness of this

  • @iDontHaveMonitor Just because of graphics? Lolk. Looks don't mean shit.

  • Looks like a mix of Battlefield 3 and Metal Gear Solid 4

  • How about just playing battlefield 3? better in any way

  • The sad part is that we already have more accurate military combat simulators.

  • I'm actually not that impressed.

  • Its interesting that people are complaining about the part of getting arabic wrong while these Americans are obviously invading a place where arabic is the language. Also, I've lived in that part of the world for a decade and I've seen terrible english in store signs and nobody gave a crap. Its a training simulator.

  • in frostbite 2 you can destroy buildings

  • @CoreyGamer BF3's destruction is scripted and not realistic at all, so how would that be useful in a super realistic combat simulator?

  • And as always, they cant properly write Arabic. Stupid fucking Americans.

  • @10samm10 Who cares, it's not important

  • for the love of God, arabic looks like this

    العربية

    not like this

    ا ل ع رب ي ة

  • is this how homefront 2's gonna look?

  • modern warfare 4 *-*

    haha'

  • they could've at least made the soldiers not point their guns all around while running...

  • why don't you use ArmA 2 instead of wasting 50 million of bucks in this?

  • those guys run like they took an arrow in the kn.... GOD DAMNIT WHY. WHY.

  • @battlfild3BESTEVER

    Except Frostbite actually doesn't have a physics system, CryEngine does.

  • Jesus...everyone is ripped off everyone in the FPS industry its not even fucking worth making any more...

  • They pay soldiers in VIDEOGAMES now?

  • if they fix those animation then it will be decent compared to today's engines

  • How very.. Brown..

  • Looks like MGS4 from 4-5 years ago. These guys at Immersive are amateurs.

  • @Domak89 Amateurs being given 57 million in taxpayer money to do this. Only makes it even worse.

  • @Domak89 go play metal gear again and you will see

  • @Domak89

    Its a Mil-Sim only designed for the military. Similar to VBS2/VTK and the like. It'll never be made public, but if it is, it'll likely run in excess of $1200-2500 per license.

  • @Domak89 MGS4 probably doesn't look as good as you remember. Side by side I'm sure these would look much better.

  • @Domak89

    Think what they are showing here is real-time.... real-time is not easy in any field..

    the army will use this for training (killing more people)

  • @Domak89 looks like MW1 or MW2 LMAO

    

  • @Domak89 and what are your qualifications?

  • @Domak89 Hardly.

  • @Domak89 Also you're an idiot.

  • @Domak89 They wont put much effort in a game that wont be sold.

  • SO ABOUT THAT AI THEN

  • VR training, huh?

  • nothing in this video that i haven't seen in the last 10 years.

  • developer heard about motion-capturing

    

  • 0:55 That gun clipping

  • Animations are pretty FUCKING bad.

  • Comment removed

  • nice graphics

  • battlefield 3 still looks better and the walking and running animations are much better.

  • If the AI it's like on Crysis 2 then the US are screwed.

  • Next-gen, here we come!!

  • @Craziestout frostbite 2 wins! animations suck... also cryengine 3 destruction is worse than cryengine 2.

  • @BeastlyRig Not true at all.The animations are COMPLETELY the devs fault and not the engines fault. Anyone that used Cryengine 2 or 3 can tell you this. As for destruction, Frostbite 1 and 2 both have scripted destruction. You hit certain spots, the buildings fall in certain ways. It's scripted. The only part that is dynamic is WHEN it falls. Go watch videos of Sandbox editor for CryEngine 3, it's JUST as good as Crengine 2. The destruction limits on Crysis 2 were because of consoles

  • @Kougeru shut up noob

  • @toolblox I love BF3, but you can't argue with the facts. Seriously just watch some videos of Sandbox editor physics and it's dozens of times more dynamic and realistic than Frostbite's scripted physics. You even adjust the physics on the PC version of Crysis 2 in the editor to make it super realistic, it's awesome with the mods people made using the engine. Again, the animation issue in this video is the developers fault, which is funny for the amount of money they spent.

  • @BeastlyRig

    All I wrote was "Next-gen here we come" Frostbite 2 is ofcourse a Next-gen engine as well. Dice has confirmed it!

    However, I think we'll see a updated Cryengine 3 or Cryengine 4 in 2013-14...

  • @BeastlyRig cry engine 3 sucks because they focused on consoles... damn it, cry engine 2 is from 2007 and pwns in almost every single way to ce 3

  • @gmk120 you are wrong!!!!

    cry engine 3 its more powerfull than the 2 and as you say its more accesible.

  • @UsielX it isn't, if you unlock the ultra-high settings on cry engine 2 sandbox it looks better than cry engine 3 DX 11 maxed out

  • wow... the animation is funky looking

  • Zombie Gunship 0:40

  • Comment removed

  • Damn it guys! Please can someone work on that water?

  • Wanna play as insurgent, and kick some fat asses!

  • Frostbite 2 looks better in my opinion

  • Hmm looks better than Bf3

  • Crydev sent me here :D

  • Comment removed

  • Cry Engine 3... Winning!

  • And still the army is gay

  • @SuperKillerCameron you'd fit right in then

  • Cinematographic? No, I don't think so.

    Thus, there's too much gray for my standards.

  • @XAuTomaT1CX too bad bit-torrent can't host downloads.

  • meh

  • They run like Welshmen.

  • Those graphic's look... pretty good. But those animations are horrible.

  • release the game to fucking gamers. not the army. this shit probably doesnt even help that much. the predator drone or ac-130 whichever it was, was way too clear. IRL feeds are much grittier not some HD cryengine

  • @randeDANDE they probably are HD but low quality when recorded for latr analysis, would be impractical to carry terrabites of data for every mission.

  • Comment removed

  • It seems like this is not targeted at the serious games market with this marketing strategy

  • There's something really goofy with those running and walking animations

  • @Sindrio2 was wondering what was going on there

  • @Sindrio2

    Probably because they're not interested in realistic animations. This is purely a strategic tool, not a game. It looks real to make sure those training on it are immersed, but having 100% lifelike animations aren't worth the thousands of man hour it would take when other things are much more important in a training tool.

  • @Sindrio2 Yeah, they didn't use mocap. IMHO it takes away from the "reality" of everything when you have photo-real environments and cartoony animation.

  • @Sindrio2 Yes I agree I think they could have done a better job with the way this game looked in its entirety.

  • @Sindrio2 they didn't have ANT

  • @Sindrio2 their stride length is too long

  • Battlefield 3 looks better

  • @pixartist

    No it doesn't. 

  • Looks better on PC.

  • Looks almost as good as Arma 2/VBS 2/Arma 3. Almost...

  • @1123581121 the arma engine is pretty old. the envoirments are actually horribly engineered and the game is poorly optimized. dont get me wrong i love arma 2 play it allot but if they would use this engine it could reach a potential much greater then it is now. we can only hope the arma 3 engine will be better

  • @strontklont

    BIS doesn't have 50 million dollars to spend. That's the simple truth. They simply build a game out of the engine enhancements that their sister company in australia make for other military training tools.

  • nice graphics but we should see realism of gameplay , graphics are not important for sim players , we want realism :)

  • @ardaxoy graphics contribute allot to realisme. if your game looks like shit the immersion drops.

  • @ardaxoy It's a tech demo, you stupid motherfucker. Maybe you should eat a tonne of shit.

  • @LordfishKeke

    what kind of a child are you ? i said graphics are good but we should see gameplay , no need to be rude yea ?

  • @ardaxoy Do you not know what a tech Demo is?

  • @LordfishKeke

    i know but i just said we should see real gameplay :) , yes its a tech demo

  • @ardaxoy YOUR IDIOCY MAKES ME ANGRY.

  • cryengine 3 has incredible power.

  • I wanna play this soooooo badly!!

  • Modern Warfare 4  -.-"

  • @mirek2377 Are you crazy!! This is a real time full scale sandbox military simulator...

  • @UniverseVic this is CRYENGINE 3 a free sdk for download at crydev (dot) net

  • @mirek2377 no.

  • @mirek2377 Fuck off with your CoD Shit. This is a training software, not a game.

  • @mirek2377 Modern Warfare 3 used an updated version of technology that is nearly three years old. Modern Warfare 4 will either not exist as the series' popularity is already declining, or remain entirely unimpressive visually. All that matters to Activision is money, and it is guaranteed they will release another rushed game. If you are hating, then leave this video right now. No one asked you for your opinion of a video game. This is training software. No, I am not defending Activision.

  • @ImminentCrysis

    And to add further, all COD games after cod 1&2 , used enhanced cod 1 engine...BUT ...cod 1 engine was in fact, enhanced quake 3 engine, with that said, quality of cod is questionable...

  • Mheee, nothing revolutionary.

  • Hellooo Battlefield 4

  • @LtLethal1 actually it is the engine used in crysis 2