As disappointed as I am by BBT's misuse of "negative reinforcement," it makes me kind of happy in a weird way that the top comments are viewers who also noticed that.
The analogy they use here for negative reinforcement is incorrect. Negative reinforcement is the "taking away" of an adverse stimulus to increase behavior. "Squirting her in the face with water" is positive punishment, or adding an adverse stimulus to decrease behavior.
The analogy they use here for negative reinforcement is incorrect. Negative reinforcement is the "taking away" of an adverse stimulus to increase behavior. "Squirting her in the face with water" is positive punishment, or adding an adverse stimulus to decrease behavior.
Ok, look. He is using OPERANT conditioning, which has nothing to do with pavlov. It uses positive reinforcement, rewards, positive punishment, like an electric shock, negative reinforcement, taking something bad (like electric shocks) away, and negative punishment, taking something good away, in order to train behavior.
Technically, employing punishment isn't negative reinforcement. Negative reinforcement occurs when a negative stimulus is removed as a result of behaviour, thereby making that behaviour more likely (ie. reinforcing it). If he was to cause her some sort of continuous discomfort that was removed when she behaved "correctly," that would be negative reinforcement.
@STNeish This is what we humans call a comedy show. Discussing the pros and cons of behavioural modification is, as can be evidenced by other comments, of no interest.
@CocoaNutCakery If the shock was continuous, then yes. However, if the shocks occurred in response to behaviour, it would make that behaviour less likely. That's PUNISHMENT. Reinforcement always makes behaviour MORE likely.
@CocoaNutCakery Again, it would require Sheldon to administer a continuous shock to Penny for it to be negative reinforcement. That's not likely what he meant, especially considering the alternative suggested was punitive water squirtings, but I suppose he really didn't say one way or the other.
@STNeish he already does that without knowing cuz sheldon is such a pain in the ass, if penny behaves the way he like he won't be like that anymore so he is kind of using this negative reinforcement ALL the time :p
@STNeish No doubt that this is a regular misconception. I think the show was trying to not dwelling into too much technicality and hence avoided confusion, even in doing so sacrificing some accuracy. Squirting water indeed would be called "positive punishment" rather than "negative reinforcement."
People really do respond to the environment, I have seen people take on the attitude problems of television; a war movie, then they must be aggressive; a sad moment, we get strange sadness; the attitudes and words of the character influence current feelings and statements. Our drama of environment is never-ending.
Someone's probably already said this but negative reinforcement is NOT punishment. Negative reinforcement is the removal of bad stimuli (eg. if you're ill, you take some medication, start feeling better and learn to do this in future).
Anyway, I thought I'd get that out there because it bothered me when I saw this episode. Although I know the writers make mistakes, this is a really obvious one.
That's where the original theory comes from yes, but behaviorism's ideas of positive and negative reinforcement are very much applicable to any behavior. Voluntary behavior is definitely included in that.
Oh come on! It's just a tv show for crying out loud, stop trying to show off your psych knowledge, it's very unbecoming. Or at least find a better place to do it besides a comment wall on YouTube. I mean really! I love psychology as much as the next guy but you're being a little ridiculous there kiddo.
Well, I prefer seeing these types of comments rather than the 80% of stupid crap idiots write on Youtube. And BTW those comments weren't directed at you, so why does it bother you so much? Live & let live.
Just to be technical for a moment... "Negative reinforcement" is rewarding something by removing an aversive, not by applying an aversive (like squirting water or electric shock). If you're going to use the terminology of operant conditioning, use it right!
No, it's operant conditioning. He's trying to change the strength of a behavior, not form an association between two stimuli. (Or maybe you were joking; it's hard to tell what the "hahaha" is for without punctuation.)
I have a feeling that the thing that Sheldon is referring to when mentioning R- is the Lovaasian thing in the 60s or 70s when he used electrical strips on floors as a means to provide noxious stimuli to autistic kids in order to get them to behave less autistically... a somewhat unethical thing, in my book.
when they lower her voice she sounds depressed. i like her normal voice
aj19bcx 12 hours ago
As disappointed as I am by BBT's misuse of "negative reinforcement," it makes me kind of happy in a weird way that the top comments are viewers who also noticed that.
scotjonesxs 3 days ago
Psychology. :D
7DrPhysics 1 week ago
The actor who portrays Lennard also plays Mr.Piper on Good Luck Charlie! :DD
teenpopsensation365 1 week ago
Look at 1:34 shes like trying so hard not to laugh
MelonZephos 1 month ago
@MelonZephos wonder how often they had to retake the scene..XD
TheAllimania 3 weeks ago
I found Sheldon really hot in this opening scene.... sorta in an evil genius d&s way... lol
gigimc 1 month ago 5
@gigimc I agree.
artno8854 1 month ago
To top comments, everyone here took psy101.
gorgeouscfso 1 month ago 5
Glad the top rated comments have access to Google.
squeezeslemons 1 month ago
does penny own 5 accounts? =]
toolshed90 1 month ago
Where's the part where she catches it in her mouth?
cbrme97 2 months ago
We're getting smarter already.
jemish16 2 months ago
0:50 sheldons face :D
zedkpea 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this show is for pompous fags.
8fortynine 3 months ago
The analogy they use here for negative reinforcement is incorrect. Negative reinforcement is the "taking away" of an adverse stimulus to increase behavior. "Squirting her in the face with water" is positive punishment, or adding an adverse stimulus to decrease behavior.
neuroticpsyc83 4 months ago 31
@neuroticpsyc83 OMG. I was just about to post the same thing. Psych major? :D
dccarlos15 4 months ago
@neuroticpsyc83 blablablablabla
megadeth652 3 months ago
@neuroticpsyc83 I yelled it at the TV when I saw it!
endersftd 3 weeks ago
@neuroticpsyc83 It is negative reinforcement if he doesn't stop spraying her until she stops the undesired behavior.
raelonewolf 3 days ago
@neuroticpsyc83 It's still hilarious :D
konstantinkostia 2 days ago
The analogy they use here for negative reinforcement is incorrect. Negative reinforcement is the "taking away" of an adverse stimulus to increase behavior. "Squirting her in the face with water" is positive punishment, or adding an adverse stimulus to decrease behavior.
neuroticpsyc83 4 months ago
Mt psychology teacher showed this to us to teach us classical conditioning in my first year of college
girlovesbacon 4 months ago 4
@girlovesbacon MINE TOO! Go awesome psych teacher!
LadyDreary 4 months ago
She's trying so hard not to laugh!!!! XD Hahahaa.
dccarlos15 4 months ago
Obviously, waitressing at the Cheesecake Factory is a complex socioeconomic activity that requires a great deal of analysis and planning. BAZINGA!
gabrielvarig 4 months ago
Wish Penny was with Sheldon...
jadeeehh 5 months ago 2
Pure brilliance
BrugesFan23 5 months ago
Day-um!!
brownblair98 5 months ago
we used this vid for a psych project....BEST PROJECT EVER!!!!
XDLadyHydrangea 5 months ago
Genius scene here.
LaurelVentura 6 months ago 2
lol bad lenerd and chocolate for penny
sumadman12 6 months ago 2
...this could work.
ifeelrelaxed 6 months ago
Doesn't it look like she's trying really hard not to laugh throughout this? lol
daemon616 7 months ago
lmao the way he says,
"Have a chocolate."
Is quite hawwwt <3
xP
phillipzchillz 7 months ago
Ok, look. He is using OPERANT conditioning, which has nothing to do with pavlov. It uses positive reinforcement, rewards, positive punishment, like an electric shock, negative reinforcement, taking something bad (like electric shocks) away, and negative punishment, taking something good away, in order to train behavior.
DekugaLyon 8 months ago
love how Sheldon says BAZINGA 0:18 out the corner of his mouth like that :') aww Sheldon <333.
Glowormm 9 months ago 7
Actually, electric shocks are still positive reinforcements....
yauyuso 9 months ago
@yauyuso I would still rather have sex, or chocolate
PhilAFire93 9 months ago
@yauyuso Technically, positive punishments.
advancewarsaddict 7 months ago
ROFLMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
octavio3d4d 1 year ago
Oh why don't we directly go on to Pavlov? =D
GattinoSproetje 1 year ago
@GattinoSproetje because pavlov trained dogs and that would be calling her a bitch in a joke that hardly anyone would understand
cheeseshoes 9 months ago
@cheeseshoes True!
GattinoSproetje 9 months ago
i wish netflix puts this up for instant, I really wanna get into it
KingZidane92 1 year ago
Technically, employing punishment isn't negative reinforcement. Negative reinforcement occurs when a negative stimulus is removed as a result of behaviour, thereby making that behaviour more likely (ie. reinforcing it). If he was to cause her some sort of continuous discomfort that was removed when she behaved "correctly," that would be negative reinforcement.
STNeish 1 year ago 52
@STNeish cooooooooooooooooooooooooool
im pretty sure everyone cares.
tipttt 1 year ago
@tipttt Sarcasm? I was just providing some information for the sake of interest. Take from it what you will.
STNeish 1 year ago
@STNeish coooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
tipttt 1 year ago
@tipttt LMMFAOOO
Blobsterisation 3 months ago
@STNeish This is what we humans call a comedy show. Discussing the pros and cons of behavioural modification is, as can be evidenced by other comments, of no interest.
spacecowboy5000 7 months ago
@spacecowboy5000 I'd say the fact several people have been discussing it is evidence that there is at least some interest in the subject.
STNeish 7 months ago
@STNeish cool story bro
HighOfSeventyFive 11 months ago
@STNeish woooooooooooow. thats so interesting.
sparkztm 11 months ago
@STNeish You mean like harmless electrical shocks?
CocoaNutCakery 2 months ago
@CocoaNutCakery If the shock was continuous, then yes. However, if the shocks occurred in response to behaviour, it would make that behaviour less likely. That's PUNISHMENT. Reinforcement always makes behaviour MORE likely.
STNeish 2 months ago
@STNeish I am fully aware. However, people (including you) talk about how Sheldon was using that term improperly.
But it's entirely possible that you've misinterpreted Sheldon's words.
CocoaNutCakery 2 months ago
@CocoaNutCakery Again, it would require Sheldon to administer a continuous shock to Penny for it to be negative reinforcement. That's not likely what he meant, especially considering the alternative suggested was punitive water squirtings, but I suppose he really didn't say one way or the other.
STNeish 2 months ago
@STNeish nerd :)
iateurwifewfavabeans 1 month ago
@iateurwifewfavabeans And proud of it! :)
STNeish 1 month ago
@STNeish he already does that without knowing cuz sheldon is such a pain in the ass, if penny behaves the way he like he won't be like that anymore so he is kind of using this negative reinforcement ALL the time :p
callawaydekluizen 1 month ago
@STNeish No doubt that this is a regular misconception. I think the show was trying to not dwelling into too much technicality and hence avoided confusion, even in doing so sacrificing some accuracy. Squirting water indeed would be called "positive punishment" rather than "negative reinforcement."
leminhphuc123 5 days ago
@STNeish Bazinga!
TrIXtr2011 3 days ago
xD YES. I love this guy. Too much.
WishesSetFree 1 year ago
LOL my class used this for a BF Skinner presentation...BBT in class is awesome :P
FaithMartinaTim 1 year ago
Build a better girlfriend? I'm surprised they haven't done a show where Howard tries that- the closest thing we got was the robot hand
landcommander1981 1 year ago
I personally find Penny's laugh adorable!
Twilightsavitar 1 year ago 6
hahaha he fucking succeded!!!
Supremed9 1 year ago
sheldon rządzi ;-p
krolowaobcych 1 year ago
i'm soo like sheldon XD
Rcpengy123 1 year ago
People really do respond to the environment, I have seen people take on the attitude problems of television; a war movie, then they must be aggressive; a sad moment, we get strange sadness; the attitudes and words of the character influence current feelings and statements. Our drama of environment is never-ending.
WOWJBEOWULF 1 year ago
Pennys been reduced to a puppy.
SteveSasuke 1 year ago
friki ^^(L)
GaRaPaTojr 1 year ago
she wanted to laugh so bad
matrixshizhizle 1 year ago 4
Sheldon is a little freaky sometimes.
SnapeHermioneshipper 1 year ago
LOL BAZINGA
zoieweirdgoodfunny 1 year ago 3
bazinga
DeathThenZombie 1 year ago
hahah bazinga!
HollyHaHa92 1 year ago
hahaha, rapeface indeed :) sheldon is ma nigga
Kimapoe 1 year ago
pause at 1:43 sheldons rape face.
kawa1spaz 1 year ago 3
@kawa1spaz Sheldon's too epic for a rape face :P
Jill4ChrisRedfeild 1 year ago
chocolate?
freazer123 1 year ago
Someone's probably already said this but negative reinforcement is NOT punishment. Negative reinforcement is the removal of bad stimuli (eg. if you're ill, you take some medication, start feeling better and learn to do this in future).
Anyway, I thought I'd get that out there because it bothered me when I saw this episode. Although I know the writers make mistakes, this is a really obvious one.
PsychedelicGroove 1 year ago
@PsychedelicGroove had to post a reply on facebook cus this system woyuldn't accept it
wavnut 1 year ago
@PsychedelicGroove nerd.
beatokko 1 year ago
@PsychedelicGroove well they only have a physicist on set, not a psychologist =/
aliciathefatpenguin 1 year ago
hahahaha =)) thnx for the vid men!
CloudWhasim 1 year ago
Oh my god, Sheldon's awesome.
bealove002 1 year ago
omg this is hilarious the way he got pennys voice low XD even she was trying not 2 laugh lmao
haha i love it when sheldons voice is rly low at the endd <3
lonelydiva 1 year ago 7
LMAO that's hilarious
adventureCalls 1 year ago 4
classical conditioning actually deals with reflexive behaviors, like pavlovs experiments with making dogs drool, NOT voluntary behaviors
musiclover611 1 year ago
That's where the original theory comes from yes, but behaviorism's ideas of positive and negative reinforcement are very much applicable to any behavior. Voluntary behavior is definitely included in that.
thecalhounninja 1 year ago 3
Aha!
imcoolandreallynot 2 years ago
I figured out what was happening. I want chocolate now.
I love Sheldon!
astrangeone 2 years ago 9
That smirk Sheldon gave at the end says it all =P
MonkeyBoy2194 2 years ago 222
Look at sheldon's face at 0:48-0:51 : crazy scientist and that smile in the end means : BAZINGA!
Lililo1985 2 years ago 2
Oh come on! It's just a tv show for crying out loud, stop trying to show off your psych knowledge, it's very unbecoming. Or at least find a better place to do it besides a comment wall on YouTube. I mean really! I love psychology as much as the next guy but you're being a little ridiculous there kiddo.
mjcrawford90 2 years ago 246
Well, I prefer seeing these types of comments rather than the 80% of stupid crap idiots write on Youtube. And BTW those comments weren't directed at you, so why does it bother you so much? Live & let live.
Radwar99 2 years ago 3
@mjcrawford90 lol, Thumbs ub!
Jayskiallthewayski 7 months ago
@mjcrawford90
Look, it's Penny.
lordsorgo 6 months ago
LOL
miguelovic 2 years ago
Parlov experiment?
hahahaha XD
Aralyss 2 years ago
Do you mean Pavlov?
ksid7213 1 year ago 2
Just to be technical for a moment... "Negative reinforcement" is rewarding something by removing an aversive, not by applying an aversive (like squirting water or electric shock). If you're going to use the terminology of operant conditioning, use it right!
StacyBS 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
youre right about the negative reinforcement being the act of removing something aversive, but its classical not operant conditioning hahaha
aidanctam 2 years ago
No, it's operant conditioning. He's trying to change the strength of a behavior, not form an association between two stimuli. (Or maybe you were joking; it's hard to tell what the "hahaha" is for without punctuation.)
StacyBS 2 years ago 3
@StacyBS oh yeah u are correct. i wasnt joking when i posted i dont think but now that u say that i believe u are correct :)
aidanctam 1 year ago
@StacyBS
I have a feeling that the thing that Sheldon is referring to when mentioning R- is the Lovaasian thing in the 60s or 70s when he used electrical strips on floors as a means to provide noxious stimuli to autistic kids in order to get them to behave less autistically... a somewhat unethical thing, in my book.
but your definition of R- is spot on.
psychobollox 8 months ago
@psychobollox *Cough* Un-necessary *Cough* nerdy *Cough* Behaviour *Cough.* Excuse me.
TheCookieKing95 7 months ago
@TheCookieKing95
unnecessary stupidity.... i don't supposee you can help it, can you?
don't answer that. it was rhetorical.
psychobollox 7 months ago
@psychobollox How was that an exhibit of stupidity?
TheCookieKing95 7 months ago
excellent!
Auumz 2 years ago