Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
T5 - i think it's better choice for this car;)
bociannielot 2 months ago
its actually 8.5sec. not 9.2
kevcrave 4 months ago
@allenspedface32 yes
inf0rmale 1 year ago
@inf0rmale Just pointing this out to you. I drive a Volvo V50 2.0D 2006 and the acceleration is more less like that which is quite surprising, considering the fact you drive a 170 hp car and I drive a sluggish 2.0 Turbo Diesel with only 136 hp.
PS2Gameplays 2 years ago
oops, sorry. I though you were commenting my other video with XC90.
Yep. This car is not as fast as one would imagine.
inf0rmale 2 years ago
1. Your tank is full
2. The car is heavy
3. It's an Automatic.
PS2Gameplays 2 years ago
Did you shift using the geartronic? Manual shifting should yield a faster time than 9.2 sec. Also, I've seen tests that show that the S40 is faster from 5-60 (a rolling start) than 0-60 when compared to similar cars. My own experience seems to confirm this.
jsy005 2 years ago
how much faster does it do from 0-60 to 5-60?
like what are the difference in time?
ScrewFearMe 2 years ago
in line 5 sounds amazing, I love these engines
piotrrrekkk 2 years ago 9
Comment removed
hmtaylor7 2 years ago
Those are kilometres... which is quite obvious for two reasons: (1) it's a stock 170bhp car, (2) people usually time 0-60 mph OR 0-100 km/h. Nobody points out 0-100 mph of a car.
inf0rmale 2 years ago
man, im probably going to be getting one of these next week (manual) but nevertheless, I thought it was a little quicker than that....
hmtaylor7 2 years ago
install a turbo lol... it is a heavier car because volvo is about safety though btw so that plays in a factor i have one and its got no clutch manual e-gear i dont use it too often though
repta272 2 years ago
@repta272 I don't think it's recommended that you install a turbo on the 2.4i s40.. . it has something to do with the engine not being able to run optimally so anyone looking to buy an S40 is better off getting the T5.
pianoman469 1 year ago
shit those times sucks big time
riders 3 years ago
that 0-60 seemed that was made uphill because the S40 2.4 5AT does 0-60 in 8.5 not 9.2, the engine sounds awesome
Volvo89 3 years ago 2
The saab is more powerful but its slower 0-100 9.7 seconds
markus11chung 3 years ago
i rather get a saab 9-3 2.0t thats more powerful and the same price. thats seems sluggish
shawtiee1085 3 years ago
Love the sound of that engine!
FreudianJedi 3 years ago
they are supposed to go to 60 in 8.5 is it quick enough?
shawtiee1085 3 years ago