WEAK. First you use Neflim to trick people into watching your video, then you make stupid arguments. Hitler's ideology was DIRECTLY related and dependant on evolution. He believed he was evolving the human race by out selecting undesired genes. It was completely inspired by Darwinian Ideology. It's not the same as Hitler wore a belt therefore belts are evil. Conservapedia will soon surpass WP. Only liberals and atheists go to WP. CP is fair and balanced, not just the liberal side.
@alltiedup217 actually it`s called artificial selection. You worship Darwin but you don`t know the difference between artificial selection and natural selection? Atheists think they're no-it-alls but don't know squat. You just follow whatever science dictates with blind faith no matter how absurd . Maybe you should read up on evolution. Then you'd probably become a Christian once you saw what a joke evolutionismism is. If you think bananas becoming people is true, you`re dumb.
@DarthHater100 ya it is dip shit Hitler.artificial Darwin natural..see that is what they call opposites.your right anyone that think bananas become people is true are dumb.so are people that think snakes make people eat magic fruit.You just follow whatever religion dictates with blind faith no matter how absurd. example bread and wine can become flesh and blood.that you can drink poison so on and so forth.
@alltiedup217 As far as the snake, of course I don't believe in talking snakes. Snakes cant talk. But the Bible is talking about something miraculous in nature. On what basis do you have a predetermined BIAS towards miracles? What makes evolution stupid is, get this LOL, they think it happens NATURALLY LOL. That is a MUCH bigger leap of faith. Blind faith. You have to believe in something natural that cant be demonstrated naturally. It`s not even science.
@DarthHater100 do you hear yourself even yap???shock you pump out this total shit day after day.Whats a miracle?tell me how you know what one is?betcha can't.
@alltiedup217 So you cant answer my questions, but at least acknowledge that you just got totally OWNED by my last post. You know what a miracle is, stop playing stupid. It`s one thing to say that an intelligent being made a thing extremely unlikely happen by design. Like I could take a hundred dice and arrange them all to be 1. But the kind of chance evolution needs you to believe is like finding a winning lottery ticket every 10 minutes for a million years. All by chance.
@DarthHater100 No I don't what is a miracle?why can't you answer that?Your math is off by the way.any order 100 dice fall in have the same odds your going the wrong way.I don't have a bias to miracles to answer your question I really don't know what one is Tell what qualifies? bettcha can't.
@someonenobodycares Okay, Climbing Mount Improbable is a Dawkins book. So what? Is that supposed to be atheism`s bible or something? Sorry, but when your Bible is essentially written by the creator of the universe, like my Christian Bible is, then we'll be on equal footing. When chosing who to believe, man or God, I chose God.
The point was that, as the book would explain (or you could watch a video about it here on Youtube) evolution is like climbing a mountain, as apposed to jumping up the whole mountain in one leap as you imply with your lottery example from your old comment.
Oddly enough, Christians try to leap up the mountain in one bound by saying that an infinitely complex being needed no creator. That is a lot harder to explain than what us atheist believe, wouldn't you say?
@someonenobodycares Yes, I understand the stepwise progression Evolution wants you to believe. Now if I said you won a million lottery tickets at once, then it would not fit the evolution model, but winning every day is stepwise. There is a huge lack of transitional forms showing this progression. Sure there are diagrams and hypothetical scenarios but nothing real, it's all in the textbook and evolution has a long history of frauds and lies to indoctrinate their theory.
Things don't evolve with a purpose in mind. A cell didn't start out and say "One day, I want my ancestors to be humans." That is just where things took the cell.
If mutations were beneficial, they stayed (winning the lottery) but much of evolution can be explained by adaptation.
I'm not an expert on the topic, so I probably can't answer every little question you have. You might want to read a paper on it or something.
And Stalin was afraid of flying. That would be interesting; a flight attendant carrying a shotgun and saying "enjoy the flight or be shot commy bastards!"
I am wondering whether a bounded function of time, such as a probability, whose limit as t-> infinity equals its least upper bound can oscillate infinitely often.
I believe I can conjure up an example of such a function.
If that's the case, then it is possible for infinitely many intervals of time in the future where the probability of being accused of being a Nazi actually decreases for that short interval of time.
I don't agree with the version of Conservapedia's Law put forth by this video, I think it should go more like: "The probability that a Conservapedia article has a reference to Hitler is exactly 1; even if the subject of the article couldn't possibly have anything to do with Hitler or Nazism."
Though, Rational wiki is kinda biased too ...when it doesn't regard science, I mean. ANyways, for works I avoid using [X]pedias. And of course, NEVER will I use conservapedia xD
Conservapedia is not as much a wikia as it is a sum-up of all conservative bias and idiocy that despicable excuse of a political party has to has to offer.
And so I believe to-day that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator. In standing guard against the Jew I am defending the handiwork of the Lord.
Let's add to the fact that Hitler was NOT an atheist who believed in evolution. If he was, the Catholic Church would've never condoned his actions. They let him slaughter Jews and other people they didn't like because he was doing it in the name "God" and "Jesus" and all that bull shit.
Hitler was a Christian like almost every other terrible person from the past 2000 years.
@Jarut195 no, most people in germany supported him, he only did it because jews were a minority, and therefore, a scapegoat. like many other times in history. They wanted someone to blame for their bad economy, so."hey look there's less jews than us let's kill em for the bad economy! It had nothing ot do with the name of god.
Gotta love the Hitler was gay innuendo. So all those homosexuals that died in the holocaust? Meh, never happened. Oh, and all gays are mass murderers. They must imagine Nazis in pink death's head uniforms swishing their way through Poland every time they think about World War II.
Hitler had his own amalgamation of science and religion. He combined Divine Right, Christianity, and even Norse mythology with Darwinism. It was all most likely propaganda to excite the German people's imagination. Who knows what Hitler really believed?
@Hyenashowl WRONG--Hitler was not a proponent of evolution, because Darwin did not espouse a "master race" idiocy. If anything, Hitler was an opponent of Darwin, who despised eugenics and slavery--and said so openly--you need to stop listening to Hen Ham and Kent Hovind. Hitler's guru: Alfred Rosenberg, a vitriolic antisemite.
HITLER WAS NOT A DARWINIST; there's absolutely nothing which confirms this ridiculous idea.
Hitler's ideas were based on the "divine right" philosophy which has absolutely nothing to do with darwinism.
Hitler was not following the ideas of Niezsche either; the "strength of the will" of the NAZI is extracted from a phrase of Nieztsche, but which loses its meaning when put out of context.
What a lot of these Schlaflytards don't even realize is that Hitler completely misunderstood evolution. So really, fundamentalist conservatives are much more like Hitler in this regard than Darwin could have ever been.
Furthermore, the reason Hitler was a vegetarian is because he had serious problems with his digestive system (which he refused to seek medical treatment for) and thought it would help.
I believe in Intelligent Falling because Hitler believed in gravity. XD
TaiFerret 2 months ago
WEAK. First you use Neflim to trick people into watching your video, then you make stupid arguments. Hitler's ideology was DIRECTLY related and dependant on evolution. He believed he was evolving the human race by out selecting undesired genes. It was completely inspired by Darwinian Ideology. It's not the same as Hitler wore a belt therefore belts are evil. Conservapedia will soon surpass WP. Only liberals and atheists go to WP. CP is fair and balanced, not just the liberal side.
DarthHater100 2 months ago
@DarthHater100 its called natural selection moron Darthhater100 aka shockofgod this is the name he trolls with..I should say one of the names
alltiedup217 2 months ago
@alltiedup217 actually it`s called artificial selection. You worship Darwin but you don`t know the difference between artificial selection and natural selection? Atheists think they're no-it-alls but don't know squat. You just follow whatever science dictates with blind faith no matter how absurd . Maybe you should read up on evolution. Then you'd probably become a Christian once you saw what a joke evolutionismism is. If you think bananas becoming people is true, you`re dumb.
DarthHater100 2 months ago
@DarthHater100 ya it is dip shit Hitler.artificial Darwin natural..see that is what they call opposites.your right anyone that think bananas become people is true are dumb.so are people that think snakes make people eat magic fruit.You just follow whatever religion dictates with blind faith no matter how absurd. example bread and wine can become flesh and blood.that you can drink poison so on and so forth.
alltiedup217 2 months ago
@alltiedup217 As far as the snake, of course I don't believe in talking snakes. Snakes cant talk. But the Bible is talking about something miraculous in nature. On what basis do you have a predetermined BIAS towards miracles? What makes evolution stupid is, get this LOL, they think it happens NATURALLY LOL. That is a MUCH bigger leap of faith. Blind faith. You have to believe in something natural that cant be demonstrated naturally. It`s not even science.
DarthHater100 2 months ago
@DarthHater100 do you hear yourself even yap???shock you pump out this total shit day after day.Whats a miracle?tell me how you know what one is?betcha can't.
alltiedup217 2 months ago
@alltiedup217 So you cant answer my questions, but at least acknowledge that you just got totally OWNED by my last post. You know what a miracle is, stop playing stupid. It`s one thing to say that an intelligent being made a thing extremely unlikely happen by design. Like I could take a hundred dice and arrange them all to be 1. But the kind of chance evolution needs you to believe is like finding a winning lottery ticket every 10 minutes for a million years. All by chance.
DarthHater100 2 months ago
@DarthHater100 No I don't what is a miracle?why can't you answer that?Your math is off by the way.any order 100 dice fall in have the same odds your going the wrong way.I don't have a bias to miracles to answer your question I really don't know what one is Tell what qualifies? bettcha can't.
alltiedup217 2 months ago
@DarthHater100
Mount Improbable. Look it up.
someonenobodycares 1 month ago
@someonenobodycares Okay, Climbing Mount Improbable is a Dawkins book. So what? Is that supposed to be atheism`s bible or something? Sorry, but when your Bible is essentially written by the creator of the universe, like my Christian Bible is, then we'll be on equal footing. When chosing who to believe, man or God, I chose God.
DarthHater100 1 month ago
@DarthHater100
The point was that, as the book would explain (or you could watch a video about it here on Youtube) evolution is like climbing a mountain, as apposed to jumping up the whole mountain in one leap as you imply with your lottery example from your old comment.
Oddly enough, Christians try to leap up the mountain in one bound by saying that an infinitely complex being needed no creator. That is a lot harder to explain than what us atheist believe, wouldn't you say?
someonenobodycares 1 month ago
@someonenobodycares Yes, I understand the stepwise progression Evolution wants you to believe. Now if I said you won a million lottery tickets at once, then it would not fit the evolution model, but winning every day is stepwise. There is a huge lack of transitional forms showing this progression. Sure there are diagrams and hypothetical scenarios but nothing real, it's all in the textbook and evolution has a long history of frauds and lies to indoctrinate their theory.
DarthHater100 1 month ago
@DarthHater100
Things don't evolve with a purpose in mind. A cell didn't start out and say "One day, I want my ancestors to be humans." That is just where things took the cell.
If mutations were beneficial, they stayed (winning the lottery) but much of evolution can be explained by adaptation.
I'm not an expert on the topic, so I probably can't answer every little question you have. You might want to read a paper on it or something.
someonenobodycares 1 month ago 2
I can't stand Conservapedia. It's one of the biggest troll sites on the web. Just infinite stupidity...
ApatheticOmniscience 3 months ago
And Stalin was afraid of flying. That would be interesting; a flight attendant carrying a shotgun and saying "enjoy the flight or be shot commy bastards!"
PastafariansWON 5 months ago
Bachmann for president is the recommended video.
NucularRobit 7 months ago
Let's all hope Hitler didn't try and cure cancer or we'll never get funding for it.
pmk422 7 months ago
I am wondering whether a bounded function of time, such as a probability, whose limit as t-> infinity equals its least upper bound can oscillate infinitely often.
I believe I can conjure up an example of such a function.
If that's the case, then it is possible for infinitely many intervals of time in the future where the probability of being accused of being a Nazi actually decreases for that short interval of time.
mphello 8 months ago
I see the point of this video.
However, I don't like videos that have text narration, or are just of text.
I might as well read it for myself on a webpage instead.
imshaneh 9 months ago
Both Conservapedia and Godwin's Law are abominations that should not exist.
TheSkunkCat 9 months ago
Yes because Darwin was a known Nazi what with his fucking time machine and Deathbots. xD
KrimHyu 9 months ago
hmm... did you know hitler advocated modesty, abstinence, an alcohol and drug free life, not smoking and was christian? someone tell conservapee
you dang health nuts are nazis!
GodsArePeopleToo 9 months ago
Funniest video I've seen in a while.
kevinrocks2323 9 months ago
I don't agree with the version of Conservapedia's Law put forth by this video, I think it should go more like: "The probability that a Conservapedia article has a reference to Hitler is exactly 1; even if the subject of the article couldn't possibly have anything to do with Hitler or Nazism."
califoniania 1 year ago
Nice video :D
Though, Rational wiki is kinda biased too ...when it doesn't regard science, I mean. ANyways, for works I avoid using [X]pedias. And of course, NEVER will I use conservapedia xD
rolingpingu 1 year ago
Wonderful video mate!
Conservapedia is not as much a wikia as it is a sum-up of all conservative bias and idiocy that despicable excuse of a political party has to has to offer.
CarlMinez 1 year ago
Oh, it was founded by Phyllis Schlafly's son! That explains some things!
tifforo1 1 year ago
BAAAA!!!
lol
Hypergalactica 1 year ago
And so I believe to-day that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator. In standing guard against the Jew I am defending the handiwork of the Lord.
(Adolf Hitler - Mein Kampf - 1924)
ab0kanal 1 year ago 15
Let's add to the fact that Hitler was NOT an atheist who believed in evolution. If he was, the Catholic Church would've never condoned his actions. They let him slaughter Jews and other people they didn't like because he was doing it in the name "God" and "Jesus" and all that bull shit.
Hitler was a Christian like almost every other terrible person from the past 2000 years.
Jarut195 1 year ago
@Jarut195 no, most people in germany supported him, he only did it because jews were a minority, and therefore, a scapegoat. like many other times in history. They wanted someone to blame for their bad economy, so."hey look there's less jews than us let's kill em for the bad economy! It had nothing ot do with the name of god.
dragonbalism 1 year ago
Gotta love the Hitler was gay innuendo. So all those homosexuals that died in the holocaust? Meh, never happened. Oh, and all gays are mass murderers. They must imagine Nazis in pink death's head uniforms swishing their way through Poland every time they think about World War II.
AHPMB 2 years ago
Hitler had his own amalgamation of science and religion. He combined Divine Right, Christianity, and even Norse mythology with Darwinism. It was all most likely propaganda to excite the German people's imagination. Who knows what Hitler really believed?
Hyenashowl 2 years ago
hitler believed in space god aliens that we called thor and odin
paydafee 2 years ago
@Hyenashowl WRONG--Hitler was not a proponent of evolution, because Darwin did not espouse a "master race" idiocy. If anything, Hitler was an opponent of Darwin, who despised eugenics and slavery--and said so openly--you need to stop listening to Hen Ham and Kent Hovind. Hitler's guru: Alfred Rosenberg, a vitriolic antisemite.
pontecanis 1 year ago 22
The thing is Darwin's views would incite a genetic relationship between jews and Germans, something Adolf Hitler would never accept.
TheRadicalRyushin 1 year ago
In fact the whole phrase says that for the weak people courage cannot exist outside fanaticism, and it perfectly characterizes the NAZI.
Nietzsche's philosophy condemns the NAZI in fact.
Neither Darwin nor Niezsche endorse nazism, that's a complete lie from conservative freaks.
hunchbacked 2 years ago
OK, let's put things clear:
HITLER WAS NOT A DARWINIST; there's absolutely nothing which confirms this ridiculous idea.
Hitler's ideas were based on the "divine right" philosophy which has absolutely nothing to do with darwinism.
Hitler was not following the ideas of Niezsche either; the "strength of the will" of the NAZI is extracted from a phrase of Nieztsche, but which loses its meaning when put out of context.
hunchbacked 2 years ago
It's not even true that Hitler supported evolution.
He only used what was fitting him to excuse the holocaust, but he was an ultra-catholic in fact.
hunchbacked 2 years ago
What a lot of these Schlaflytards don't even realize is that Hitler completely misunderstood evolution. So really, fundamentalist conservatives are much more like Hitler in this regard than Darwin could have ever been.
Shazbotben 2 years ago
nice video but please add a soundtrack for videos like these in the future :)
odenskrigare 2 years ago
Gotta love Godwin's Law and stupid creationists.
whydoyouwanttoknow 2 years ago
great keep on rocking 5 stars from magdeburg
lovecraft32 2 years ago
You know why? Hitler was a conservative.
Seriously!
Oh, and Hitler was a vegetarian on his own. He didn't force that on anyone.
nosferotica1 2 years ago
Comment removed
tifforo1 1 year ago
@nosferotica1
Furthermore, the reason Hitler was a vegetarian is because he had serious problems with his digestive system (which he refused to seek medical treatment for) and thought it would help.
tifforo1 1 year ago
@tifforo1
I heard it happened after he lost a cousin he loved or something, and he said it felt like he was eating a corpse.
Who knows?
nosferotica1 1 year ago
LOL @ the half darwin - half hitler picture. Made my day.
Blake97201 2 years ago
2:44 was perfect.
iamnotapie 2 years ago