@tifosoviola94 they are not commercial, they just have one or two songs commercial now and if they're commercial, its not their fault, its the shit media, the shit radio that use the same song everytime... so the problem its the shi1t radio that you listen!
This is a very nice cover, the vocals are just amazing! My only complaint is the electric background and distortions. It is very noisy that it hurts my ears a little. But besides that, Muse did a fine job.
I freaking love Animals, but this cover is amazing. They are just incredible. And am I the only one who thinks this is one of the best vocals from Matt? His voice is just... ok I can't describe it.
I love how people are saying that the original is better, I'd bet a years wages on the fact that hardly anyone on youtube has ever heard the original, seeing as it has never been accredited to anyone in particular. The Animals version is the most commercially known version of it, but it was first released in the 1930's.
@catacu5 The point I was making is that The Animals version, isn't the original, The Animals version was recorded in 1964, the first known recording was released in the 1930's. So, seeing as you have lost the bet, I win. oh, and the wager was a YEARS wages :D
@surfbo You don't have to like the song, but you also don't have to put everyone who dose like this song down by saying it sucks. It has different lyrics because muse is putting there own twist on it.
The creepiness of the Animals version is what makes it so incredible and just can't be replicated. Matt actually does a decent job singing but the distortion kind of kills it. Not bad. Muse could have done better if they actually tried, sounds like this one was for fun.
Yeah, that's what a lot of their B-Sides are like. Just them mucking around for fun. I actually prefer Matt's voice to the guy in The Animals. Has more emotion if you ask me.
No original. That is the beauty of this song. Can cover it however you want ~ it's the story behind it that counts! Muse obviously knows wtf is going on!
I was about to turn this off coz I thought it was the wrong song! :O It's totally different. I adore the original. I'm gonna have to get used to this, because it's odd....
twinkle twinkle little star excellent idea.muse would bump that up a little.i would like to hear them doing princess of the strees by the stranglers that would be good but t.t.little star i think it will happen[eh! matt].
Hm, I know this won't be a popular comment on this thread, but oh well. This music, like a lot of today's music, is kind of bloated, over-the-top, and not really great. I mean a lot of people today think it's great, and to them it may well be, but if you're one of these folks: do yourself a favor: get a pair of nice headphones and start obsessing over the music of the 30s - 60s. Billie Holiday's voice, Benny Goodman's Quartet, Lightnin Hopkin's Blues, The Velvet Underground, Ennio Morricone
@denofcool I think it's just you that has a different sense of music. I really like Muse and none of that music from the 30s to the 60s can even come close to them in my taste. I don't think there's any point in trying to change peoples sense of music. because people listen to what they like, and they may not like the music you're listening to. Let's just make everyone choose their own style and leave it be. i know I personally will never be able to listen to your music without getting tired...
@denofcool i like those guys you mentioned but if you listen carefully(wich i think you didnt) to muse;radiohead;nine inch nails,Primus,there are more.you' ll see there's more to that than you think it is and dont be pretentouis in way:"old music rokz new suck" because its not true
Actually the first known existence of this song was in the early 1800's. But who cares, it has survived the times and been performed by many great artists.
The guitar is pretty much a glorified piece of wood...Its the effects you put into it that make it sound good.
And at the end of the day, u shud appreciate the actual sound that comes out of the instrument rather than the processes to produce the sound and even without effects, the band is pretty talented in general.
@I0ttie yeah there is actually understanding musical theory and being able to apply it to music. muse does a really good at trying to mix up their sound. i just get tired of them too fast
@ColonelHoraldo for f sake...im not saying that good music cant be made by not having any synth. All im trying to say that having synth doesnt ruin the music, and normally benefits it. But ofcourse music without synth sounds good aswell...I was just telling acdcpjsp to that using synth shudnt be considered to be negative.
@patrarok "The guitar is pretty much a glorified piece of wood...Its the effects you put into it that make it sound good." -Your words. You can't blame me for assuming that you meant a guitar couldn't sound good without effects.
@MoldyMuffinBuns there is no 'original', it's a folk song that was passed down. no one knows who the original author was. Even then, the first recording of it was in the 1930s, before The Animals came along.
@gunta534 it goes even further back than that: 'Alan Price of The Animals has claimed that the song was originally a sixteenth-century English folk song about a Soho brothel, and that English emigrants took the song to America where it was adapted to its later New Orleans setting.' from our friend wikipedia :-)
I absolutely love the energy I can feel in this song... I mean, I love and respect the covers other people do, and that’s how their covers are supposed to sound, but this is Muse’s cover. It’s played how THEY want it, and it’s amazing.
Though even I might say Dom went a bit overkill with the crash XD
@jessaraptor Cool your jets turbo, I don't have beef with you. I hate this cover. House of the rising sun is a blues song about remorse; this cover removes the soul of the song and the meaning of it just becomes words with an annoying techno backbeat. Also, using the word 'authority' in your sentence where you did doesn't make any sense, it would infer I have dominance on the subject where in reality I've posted an opinion, something you fans don't seem to comprehend,
@westex245 , if you knew some music, you would understand that Muse made to lose the essence of the song, I'm not saying that Muse is a bad group, I think quite the opposite, Muse is a good group but I think it is wrong to make this cover,
So typical, as soon as one cover doesn't keep it self near the original version, everyone starts to dislike it -.- Just because Muse made a more rockier version with more shouting (which I love btw) and dared to be more out there with this one. People need to be more open minded. This version rocks, and I prefer to listen to Muse version than The Animals, who did not write this song btw. I like theirs too, but this one is more my cup of tea ;)
Some songs just work better in different ways. i.e. I feel that "Baby Please Don't Go" has been done better in it's covers than it's original. Yet with this, it just doesn't feel right. I like Muse, but simply this song just seems to work best with some random dude (or girl, which was the intended singer when it was written) and an acoustic guitar (not really the Animals). But I would love to see "Baby Please Don't Go" from Muse.
Have to say it took me a while to get used to this but now I love it... My most played Muse song on Itunes and I go around the house singing it too :) Obsession or what! :D
aload of wank compared to The Animals
JOSH09118 1 week ago
Comment removed
superfineclock2 1 week ago
@JOSH09118 wanks must be good for you
07bestHA 3 days ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Search for a band called "Three Billion Heartbeats", a new band with similar colourful and grand soundscapes.
KoiChannel 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I made a vocal cover. So everyone should go watch it.
JuliaAnnWindle 1 week ago
Leadbelly... none can compare to it
PeepsWorld12 1 week ago
was expecting dogshit, but actualy pretty good
callumrocker1 2 weeks ago 3
Oi Bellamy, Leeeeaaave iiiiiiiiiiiiiiittt.
ckwlwr 2 weeks ago
i luv metallic muse) goosebumps//
nazzik112358 2 weeks ago
Well, this is one way to ruin a classic song.
safetydancer87 3 weeks ago
God, I love MUSE!
TheIndystorm 3 weeks ago
probably alone here, but i think this is miles better than the original
nasher931 3 weeks ago 3
Hipster alert!
TheBadPear 3 weeks ago
Wow! Never heard this one before. Doesn't appear in any discography that I've seen either. But it's great. Wonder if it's on iTunes?
1blueMuse 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
╯▅╰╱▔▔▔▔▔▔▔╲╯╯☼
▕▕╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╲╲╭╭
▕▕╱╱╱╱╱╱╱╱┛▂╲╲╭
╱▂▂▂▂▂▂╱╱┏▕╋▏╲╲
▔▏▂┗┓▂▕▔┛▂┏▔▂▕▔ <-House of the rising sun.
▕▕╋▏▕╋▏▏▕┏▏▕╋▏▏ _______
▕┓▔┗┓▔┏▏▕┗▏┓▔┏ I MUSE
srbija882muse 3 weeks ago
Its alright, vocals are good, but obvs the original is better.
chill579 4 weeks ago
oh no!!! it's fuckin terrible!!!!
tifosoviola94 1 month ago
@tifosoviola94 I bet you like resistance.
stephenp4ul 3 weeks ago
@stephenp4ul i don't like any songs of muse.....i think that they are commercial...and i don't like commercial music
tifosoviola94 3 weeks ago
@tifosoviola94 they are not commercial, they just have one or two songs commercial now and if they're commercial, its not their fault, its the shit media, the shit radio that use the same song everytime... so the problem its the shi1t radio that you listen!
SKDrawster 2 weeks ago
Bloody terrible. Just..No.
talt87 1 month ago
@talt87 Twilight fan.
stephenp4ul 3 weeks ago
@stephenp4ul ..Exactly how am I a twilight fan for prefering the original above this piece of trash?
talt87 3 weeks ago
@talt87
This? Trash? Lol.
SeamusPlox 2 weeks ago
@talt87 go get a life....ur geting no relationship by reading twilight books u know
themusedogg 2 weeks ago
@themusedogg ..Dafuq? What the hell does Twilight have to do with anything? I hate Muse. Period.
Sides, I have a girlfriend I'm perfectly happy with. ^.^ More than what can be said about yuuuuh~
talt87 2 weeks ago
@talt87 i think more pple agree with me
themusedogg 1 week ago
@themusedogg Dafuq?
talt87 1 week ago
@themusedogg
I do. :L
SeamusPlox 1 week ago
@talt87 knob
07bestHA 3 days ago
What a load of shit
TeamAcXa 1 month ago
@TeamAcXa I think you may have just brought up your webcam... You may or may not want to turn it off.
SilentPhantom007 1 month ago
This is a very nice cover, the vocals are just amazing! My only complaint is the electric background and distortions. It is very noisy that it hurts my ears a little. But besides that, Muse did a fine job.
SonicSpecter11 1 month ago
not as good as original but still amazing
kinglukeful 1 month ago
Very impressed, great job.
xtotheworldx 1 month ago
Moymoypalaboy's version is the best.
xforcbox54 1 month ago
The Animals version will always be my favourite, but wow... Muse, you never fail to amaze me.
DuckiChan 1 month ago
WOW..... just wow........ im fucking astonished, massive thumbs up to the best cover of my most favorite tune of all time, 5 stars boys
666thesnowman 1 month ago 4
t francais?
typesnipe360 2 months ago
No one will be able to sing this song like the animals do!!! (even if you are Muse)
Kindtoall4ever 2 months ago
@Kindtoall4ever You're right they animals are brilliant but you should listen to the original version by leadbelly, it's strange but quite awesom.
blairejack 2 months ago
@blairejack you're right leadbelly was brilliant but you should listen to the earlier version by texas alexander, it's strange but also quite awsome.
honestbob45 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
His vocal and guitar part blow my mind!!! Best version ever! Wish them play it live :((((((((((((((((((
Liana87able 2 months ago
Comment removed
Liana87able 2 months ago
I freaking love Animals, but this cover is amazing. They are just incredible. And am I the only one who thinks this is one of the best vocals from Matt? His voice is just... ok I can't describe it.
Lucsia95 2 months ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this sucks
Corleonetone 3 months ago
@Corleonetone YOU SUCK
polriva 2 months ago 29
meh!i'm quite indifferent to this
1989melkor 3 months ago
I love how people are saying that the original is better, I'd bet a years wages on the fact that hardly anyone on youtube has ever heard the original, seeing as it has never been accredited to anyone in particular. The Animals version is the most commercially known version of it, but it was first released in the 1930's.
andydale78 3 months ago
@andydale78 its got16mil views more than this
catacu5 3 months ago
@catacu5 and your point is?
andydale78 3 months ago
@andydale78 more people have heard of the original so I'll have your weeks wages
catacu5 3 months ago
@catacu5 The point I was making is that The Animals version, isn't the original, The Animals version was recorded in 1964, the first known recording was released in the 1930's. So, seeing as you have lost the bet, I win. oh, and the wager was a YEARS wages :D
andydale78 3 months ago
@andydale78 you can have my wages but I'm still at school so don't have a job and I wasn't aware they weren't the original, my bad
catacu5 3 months ago
@catacu5 wow, conceding a point on youtube and not turning into an internet tough guy. well done.
andydale78 3 months ago
@andydale78 how am I being an "internet tough guy" ?
catacu5 3 months ago
@catacu5 I said ''Not turning into an internet tough guy.'' no offence intended but I assume you learned to read in school?
andydale78 3 months ago
@catacu5 also, please link which house of the rising sun video has 16 million more views than this one, the highest I have found in 14 million more.
andydale78 3 months ago
Muse's style прикольно)
androidanet 3 months ago
Animals is the best but this probably the second best by far. This just goes super hard.
kev0000in 3 months ago
Love Muse, but not this version...
Kjini 4 months ago
I like this way more than the Aminal's version. For me this is in your face, fast, furious and as always Matt's vocals are quality.
redmeat73 4 months ago
People clearly don't understand British bands, haha
The recording doesn't do it justice
Tahrin3D 4 months ago 8
love this version (thought the animals version is still probably the best). Muse = <3
mbmtheatre 4 months ago
An okay version. Of course Animals are better, but Matt's singing alright. The arrangment however isn't just it.
CutToSleep 4 months ago
ахренеть.
hhummell888 4 months ago
Shit.
RyanFuckinKilpatrick 4 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nice attempt but This version sucks!!!!! If your going to play the song learn the lyrics!!!
surfbo 4 months ago
@surfbo You don't have to like the song, but you also don't have to put everyone who dose like this song down by saying it sucks. It has different lyrics because muse is putting there own twist on it.
RubixCubed95 4 months ago
@surfbo Whit a sec. they got the lyrics right. they just shortened the song a bit. What's with all this "learn the lyrics" crap!?
RubixCubed95 4 months ago
The creepiness of the Animals version is what makes it so incredible and just can't be replicated. Matt actually does a decent job singing but the distortion kind of kills it. Not bad. Muse could have done better if they actually tried, sounds like this one was for fun.
johnnyg129 5 months ago
@johnnyg129
Yeah, that's what a lot of their B-Sides are like. Just them mucking around for fun. I actually prefer Matt's voice to the guy in The Animals. Has more emotion if you ask me.
WhereBeWaldoAt 4 months ago
@johnnyg129 yeah, it really didn't need the distortion. It's pretty good but would've been better without it.
nthib91 3 months ago
Animals version=Amazing
Muse version=Amazing in a totally different way
Both are awesome. Other versions are decent too, but those two are my favorites.
MUSEFAN8383 5 months ago in playlist More videos from paris111191 75
This comment has received too many negative votes show
gooooooddd!!! my ears!!!!! agggg, cut their hands or their heads, please please, my ears, so so so so so bad
runaway381 3 months ago
@MUSEFAN8383 What are you thinking about Thin LIzzys version of it?
illdieyoung 2 months ago
lmao this is funny but great
gogolplex74 5 months ago
No original. That is the beauty of this song. Can cover it however you want ~ it's the story behind it that counts! Muse obviously knows wtf is going on!
silliewildflower 5 months ago 5
They played this song at the LA Rising but only the beginning
Alexga0696 5 months ago
this song makes me shiver! how can i download this?
TheJackinder 5 months ago
@TheJackinder Youtube converter just google it...
22Pattihrafn 5 months ago
FUCK YOU DISLIKERS THIS IS WAY BETTER THAN THE ORIGINAL!!
RockNieto 5 months ago
This is my favourite version of this song EVER, I wish they'd play the whole song live instead of just the intro D:
amychristinaxo 5 months ago 34
I was about to turn this off coz I thought it was the wrong song! :O It's totally different. I adore the original. I'm gonna have to get used to this, because it's odd....
Glitzarr 5 months ago
this version is amazing period!
afwifey06 6 months ago
The best interpretation ever... Now I cannot listen to The Animals version - it is too plain.
monya1962 6 months ago
...Muse allways suprise me :) i like it :)
joaoloureirom1 6 months ago
twinkle twinkle little star excellent idea.muse would bump that up a little.i would like to hear them doing princess of the strees by the stranglers that would be good but t.t.little star i think it will happen[eh! matt].
thejim789mac 6 months ago
yuck
TheMicomania 6 months ago
people listen , if you don't like muse , don't listen to it and stop writing negative comments !
l0rdmart 6 months ago
Bloody hell, that's heavy! :D
NotComingBack01 6 months ago 2
this is...different i should say..not good but not bad.
ImJMadness 7 months ago
Hm, I know this won't be a popular comment on this thread, but oh well. This music, like a lot of today's music, is kind of bloated, over-the-top, and not really great. I mean a lot of people today think it's great, and to them it may well be, but if you're one of these folks: do yourself a favor: get a pair of nice headphones and start obsessing over the music of the 30s - 60s. Billie Holiday's voice, Benny Goodman's Quartet, Lightnin Hopkin's Blues, The Velvet Underground, Ennio Morricone
denofcool 7 months ago
@denofcool I think it's just you that has a different sense of music. I really like Muse and none of that music from the 30s to the 60s can even come close to them in my taste. I don't think there's any point in trying to change peoples sense of music. because people listen to what they like, and they may not like the music you're listening to. Let's just make everyone choose their own style and leave it be. i know I personally will never be able to listen to your music without getting tired...
Jake123557 6 months ago
@denofcool AMEN!
nthib91 3 months ago
@denofcool i like those guys you mentioned but if you listen carefully(wich i think you didnt) to muse;radiohead;nine inch nails,Primus,there are more.you' ll see there's more to that than you think it is and dont be pretentouis in way:"old music rokz new suck" because its not true
MagicHetero 1 month ago
excessive effects, didn't like it, but i'm not a big fan of these guys, i thought i could give them a chance, but not my style, sounds too artificial
opethgarzaMD 7 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
SO SHIT! Muse sucks :L haha
dbyo88 7 months ago
@dbyo88 then why do u listen to it? do yourself and us a favor and fuck off
wowdudeeeeeee 6 months ago
stupidity
tafyeingodelureau 7 months ago
its terrible the animals version is great it sucks
lukuntri 7 months ago
okay, it was an old folk song. but it was made famous by the animals. so everyone shut the fuck up. i like the cover anywho
StraitjacketAirsoft 7 months ago
Person below me........... YOU'RE DISCUSTING
Alexga0696 7 months ago
bloody hell... this is discusting
m1d4s13 7 months ago
Great cover
gibson2 8 months ago
what album would this be on if i converted it to mp3?
StealthSniper405 8 months ago
Fucking shit. This is awesome.
dallascowboy80 8 months ago
Luv muse
MrLegoFilmer1 8 months ago
I AM ADDICTED TO THIS COVER <3
vimtoluver5 8 months ago 3
wow beautiful cover
darktrek 8 months ago
best cover i've heard of this song Muse is the best!
TimDurante 8 months ago
full of utter shite!
dbyo88 9 months ago
Personally, I prefer this version to the Animals' version. Not that they did it badly or anything - I just like the way Muse did it.
JethroSTPRO 9 months ago
I like the version; nice attempt, but Animals did it best
vipergts223 9 months ago 2
Amazing
chm1991 9 months ago
Actually the first known existence of this song was in the early 1800's. But who cares, it has survived the times and been performed by many great artists.
gypsyangel27 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
let me say this clearly... THE SONG WITH THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF COVERS IS YESTERDAY... IF YOU DON'T TRUST ME GO CHECK IT OUT DICKHEADS!!!
lightandsound09 10 months ago
About a brothel.
shazcat23 10 months ago
oh and for the record i think that muse is extremely talented
acdcpjsp 10 months ago
:DD !!! de los mejor covers de MUSEE !!!
b3to0r 10 months ago
i think i just Jizzed xD. i am Definately gonna cover this the best i can in my band.
benjaminbreame 11 months ago
Pompous,ugly,awful sacrilege!!!
Melevolentzeroenvoy 11 months ago
@Melevolentzeroenvoy You, sir, are a pompous,ugly,awful person.
KingArmag 11 months ago
hanno rovinato un pezzo storico cosi facendo...
federicoporceddu 11 months ago
fuck synthesizers end of story, period, suck me if u dont agree
acdcpjsp 11 months ago
@acdcpjsp thats pretty stupid....
The guitar is pretty much a glorified piece of wood...Its the effects you put into it that make it sound good.
And at the end of the day, u shud appreciate the actual sound that comes out of the instrument rather than the processes to produce the sound and even without effects, the band is pretty talented in general.
patrarok 11 months ago
@patrarok yeah how about make music with out fucking stupid effects that takes talent
acdcpjsp 10 months ago
@acdcpjsp There's more to musical talent than just singing and playing an instrument.
and @patrarok it's* their*
I0ttie 10 months ago
@I0ttie yeah there is actually understanding musical theory and being able to apply it to music. muse does a really good at trying to mix up their sound. i just get tired of them too fast
acdcpjsp 10 months ago
@patrarok and that is the stupidest thing ive ever heard. you dont need effects to make music. why has everyone forgotten that
acdcpjsp 10 months ago
@acdcpjsp mate, its there style, and it sounds good to me, end of story
patrarok 10 months ago
yeah sorry to make a big deal about nothin, i just get a little of sick of new music these days
acdcpjsp 10 months ago
@patrarok @patrarok Ever heard of an acoustic guitar? Some people even play though an amp without any added effects. Imagine that.
ColonelHoraldo 10 months ago
@ColonelHoraldo for f sake...im not saying that good music cant be made by not having any synth. All im trying to say that having synth doesnt ruin the music, and normally benefits it. But ofcourse music without synth sounds good aswell...I was just telling acdcpjsp to that using synth shudnt be considered to be negative.
patrarok 10 months ago
@patrarok "The guitar is pretty much a glorified piece of wood...Its the effects you put into it that make it sound good." -Your words. You can't blame me for assuming that you meant a guitar couldn't sound good without effects.
ColonelHoraldo 10 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
worst cover ever
stargazer444 1 year ago
I hate the instrumental in this.
IllegalFunWithWasps 1 year ago
@DaBloodyBrit5172 the original is from The Animals...
MoldyMuffinBuns 1 year ago
@MoldyMuffinBuns there is no 'original', it's a folk song that was passed down. no one knows who the original author was. Even then, the first recording of it was in the 1930s, before The Animals came along.
gunta534 1 year ago 48
@gunta534 it goes even further back than that: 'Alan Price of The Animals has claimed that the song was originally a sixteenth-century English folk song about a Soho brothel, and that English emigrants took the song to America where it was adapted to its later New Orleans setting.' from our friend wikipedia :-)
Nomen8Nescio 1 year ago
@gunta534 true! I think it's about time people think before speaking.
TheNeverendingfire 8 months ago 2
@gunta534but this definitely is a cover from the Animals, although the Animals didn't write the original.
chsxtian 8 months ago
@FreeLanceWarrior Maybe you should go listen to the original ;)
MilesGuitarist 1 year ago
@MilesGuitarist There is no known original. Every version of this song is a cover.
DaBloodyBrit5172 1 year ago
@DaBloodyBrit5172 No original? is that even possible?
MilesGuitarist 1 year ago
@MilesGuitarist Most folks songs don't have an orginal. There'll be an orginal recording but chances are it wouldn't be by the writer.
Uzzie101 11 months ago
Comment removed
TheToastedToasters 1 year ago
I absolutely love the energy I can feel in this song... I mean, I love and respect the covers other people do, and that’s how their covers are supposed to sound, but this is Muse’s cover. It’s played how THEY want it, and it’s amazing.
Though even I might say Dom went a bit overkill with the crash XD
Bungiejumper117 1 year ago 2
This cover is terrible. Look up the animals or lead belly if you want to hear this song like it's meant to be heard.
TheToastedToasters 1 year ago
@TheToastedToasters
Ok, you obviously have a lot of authority on this subject, please come down for a complimentary luncheon at the Merry Herpes Hotel.
jessaraptor 1 year ago
@jessaraptor Cool your jets turbo, I don't have beef with you. I hate this cover. House of the rising sun is a blues song about remorse; this cover removes the soul of the song and the meaning of it just becomes words with an annoying techno backbeat. Also, using the word 'authority' in your sentence where you did doesn't make any sense, it would infer I have dominance on the subject where in reality I've posted an opinion, something you fans don't seem to comprehend,
TheToastedToasters 1 year ago 2
@TheToastedToasters
It seems like you have a lot of KNOWLEDGE ON THIS SUBJECT, seeing as you know what it is like to have no soul, and annoying words.
Capslock = replacement for authority because it is a really difficult word.
jessaraptor 1 year ago
WILL MUSE EVER STOP BEING AWESOME!?!?!?!?!?
missmessy16 1 year ago 2
Great vocals
but can not compare with the classicals like the animals
LipeManz 1 year ago
MY GAAAAAAWWD!!!
swdfish21 1 year ago
AWESOME COVER , I love it !! :D
AnaelleM10 1 year ago
Beest Cover of this song that will ever exist!!!
infestedbigmac 1 year ago
Sick.
TheLonesomeJack 1 year ago
wow that was shit
wr2809 1 year ago
@wr2809 Wow, fuck off. ;D
SheryP96 1 year ago
i love house of the rising sun, and i love muse, but this disappointed me.
yddraigarian 1 year ago
@yddraigarian
I AGREE!! What a disgrace!
ImSomeKindaWonderful 1 year ago
@westex245 , if you knew some music, you would understand that Muse made to lose the essence of the song, I'm not saying that Muse is a bad group, I think quite the opposite, Muse is a good group but I think it is wrong to make this cover,
KurtManuel 1 year ago
this cover sucks
KurtManuel 1 year ago
@KurtManuel your mom sucks she gave birth to a retard baby
westex245 1 year ago
So typical, as soon as one cover doesn't keep it self near the original version, everyone starts to dislike it -.- Just because Muse made a more rockier version with more shouting (which I love btw) and dared to be more out there with this one. People need to be more open minded. This version rocks, and I prefer to listen to Muse version than The Animals, who did not write this song btw. I like theirs too, but this one is more my cup of tea ;)
Mizzbesserwisser 1 year ago 17
@Mizzbesserwisser
Some songs just work better in different ways. i.e. I feel that "Baby Please Don't Go" has been done better in it's covers than it's original. Yet with this, it just doesn't feel right. I like Muse, but simply this song just seems to work best with some random dude (or girl, which was the intended singer when it was written) and an acoustic guitar (not really the Animals). But I would love to see "Baby Please Don't Go" from Muse.
RockaRollaZombie 1 year ago
@Mizzbesserwisser I totally agree with you :)
pittgiulia 1 year ago
@Mizzbesserwisser Well said, well said. You, my friend, are very wise :)
EternalHysteria 6 months ago
This is a disgrace...
Adomax21 1 year ago
Have to say it took me a while to get used to this but now I love it... My most played Muse song on Itunes and I go around the house singing it too :) Obsession or what! :D
xoBabycakexo 1 year ago
Muse is now supporting U2 on tour... U2! Perhaps they will open up for Bon Jovi in future. But this cover and a lot of other songs will last forever.
TheBulbiker 1 year ago