If you ask me, the first shot looks like an undamaged black building in shadow, with light reflecting off the windows across the street. The sun was low in the sky, being a September morning. In the second shot, you can see damage caused by debris, and more reflections on the ground.
I don't see any damage at all in the first shot. Nothing is blackened... it's lightened, giving the illusion of blackened parts.
Also, I don't know if you know but Bill Biggart died when the North Tower collapsed. His camera and pictures were recovered near his body. I have a problem with you using his pictures for your own agenda when he's not able to defend himself, but that's another matter. And he was not "frantically" taking pictures. I don't remember exactly how many, but he only took about 5 or 6 pictures in that half hour period, after 2WTC and before 1WTC collapsed. Lastly, the WSH is to the WEST of the WTC!
wtc6 looks burnt-out. the building is blackened. I'm not trying to draw attention to any sort of flames or whatever you might think the reflection signifies. That is insignificant. Look closely at wtc6: the photos are more telling than the video.
@MindSprite okay. 2 airplanes have crashed into 2 building right next to wtc 6. the debris falling down from both towers initiated damage and fires, resulting in those pictures. what did you think happned? the government secretly did some damage to wtc 6 for fun? 9/11 is an outside job.
MindSprite, I don't know if anyone else has pointed this out in the comments, but it's definitely just the windows of 3WFC reflecting the sun onto 6WTC. I know this for a fact because every morning, between about 8:30am to about 11am, the rising sun reflecting off the WFC casts this EXACT same pattern of light onto the Freedom Tower (1WTC), which today stands in the exact spot where 6WTC used to stand. There is clearly no damage to 6WTC in that picture, you're seeing things if you think that.
I;m just reading an article that says WTC 6 had a "mysterious explosion that shot 550ft into the air immediately after flight 175 hit the South Tower, at 9:04am." 550 feet blasted into the air!!! ATF had an office in WTC6. It was left with a gigantic crater in the center of it cut through all of the floors.The article says there was a report of an"extremely high-speed missile-like object streaking toward WTC6 from behind the North Tower as the 2nd plane hit the South tower."
@molitor2005 I've looked at videos that show the buildings of the WTC Complex after both planes hit,& I'm not so sure I believe this "missile" report. Wouldn't WTC 6 be on fire if it was hit by a missile?Or would it just explode,& then possibly smolder?However,I do remember a strange black object flying from behind the North Tower after flight 175 hit the South Tower.This object is visible in many videos,& is mysterious to me.I can't identify it.Also note:ATF also had office in the Murrah Bldg.
@VRally1997 Wouldn't we then see impact damage, rather than what appears to be fire damage? There's no cladding/wall remnants/debris on the building...
@MindSprite Never thought of that :/ I may seem like I am going on a bit but could you give me your opinion on the following please :) What if molten aluminium alloy from the aircraft fell on the building from above as this would cause no physical damage but may cause a fire :/
@VRally1997 You're assuming there was an aircraft! But that still does not retract from your point regarding detritus. The "plane" impacted the northeast face of the North Tower, or the side you see facing the right side of the screen at 1:56--the object in question could not have fallen further from WTC6. The tower face directly above WTC6 was photographed as burning but not blown out (which-that photo is still controversial). :/
WTC 6 wasn't on fire. The image is a reflection from the World Finacial Center across the street. If you look at the right of the photo, you'll notice it's brightly shined by the sun.
I don't know, did a building whose volume was 5,882,400,000 fall on it. Maybe that is why it is damaged.
ziggyboi1995 1 month ago
9/11 truth-seeking citizens be aware of Disinformation Agents working on YouTube
.
YouTube; "Disinformation Agents"
CamillioD 2 months ago
JUST SAY NO! To a 911 twoofer investigation into 911.
ctcole77 3 months ago
It's a reflection from the buildings across the street... as you pointed out correctly, it was a very shiny and reflective building.
If you watch the CNN clip again you'll notice the "flames" aren't moving and there is no smoke.
UK31337 4 months ago
all of you can blow me. take my dick into your mouth and swish it around. taste that? that's me and my dick not giving a FUCK. yeah. feels nice, btw
MindSprite 4 months ago
Wtc 6 Was in a blaze because of The north towers collapse in fact it was DIRECTLY below Tower 1 (North Tower).
518735 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch all to this if you want the truth on the pentagon or to attempt to debunk!
/watch?v=hVaGht6eHoQ
megamogx 5 months ago in playlist 9/11
If you ask me, the first shot looks like an undamaged black building in shadow, with light reflecting off the windows across the street. The sun was low in the sky, being a September morning. In the second shot, you can see damage caused by debris, and more reflections on the ground.
I don't see any damage at all in the first shot. Nothing is blackened... it's lightened, giving the illusion of blackened parts.
N37BU6 8 months ago
Also, I don't know if you know but Bill Biggart died when the North Tower collapsed. His camera and pictures were recovered near his body. I have a problem with you using his pictures for your own agenda when he's not able to defend himself, but that's another matter. And he was not "frantically" taking pictures. I don't remember exactly how many, but he only took about 5 or 6 pictures in that half hour period, after 2WTC and before 1WTC collapsed. Lastly, the WSH is to the WEST of the WTC!
RKOwens4 8 months ago 2
@RKOwens4
wtc6 looks burnt-out. the building is blackened. I'm not trying to draw attention to any sort of flames or whatever you might think the reflection signifies. That is insignificant. Look closely at wtc6: the photos are more telling than the video.
MindSprite 8 months ago
@MindSprite okay. 2 airplanes have crashed into 2 building right next to wtc 6. the debris falling down from both towers initiated damage and fires, resulting in those pictures. what did you think happned? the government secretly did some damage to wtc 6 for fun? 9/11 is an outside job.
breadsped98 6 months ago
@RKOwens4
My only agenda is one of mental masturbation. I'm not sure what else you can do on YouTube
MindSprite 8 months ago
MindSprite, I don't know if anyone else has pointed this out in the comments, but it's definitely just the windows of 3WFC reflecting the sun onto 6WTC. I know this for a fact because every morning, between about 8:30am to about 11am, the rising sun reflecting off the WFC casts this EXACT same pattern of light onto the Freedom Tower (1WTC), which today stands in the exact spot where 6WTC used to stand. There is clearly no damage to 6WTC in that picture, you're seeing things if you think that.
RKOwens4 8 months ago
I;m just reading an article that says WTC 6 had a "mysterious explosion that shot 550ft into the air immediately after flight 175 hit the South Tower, at 9:04am." 550 feet blasted into the air!!! ATF had an office in WTC6. It was left with a gigantic crater in the center of it cut through all of the floors.The article says there was a report of an"extremely high-speed missile-like object streaking toward WTC6 from behind the North Tower as the 2nd plane hit the South tower."
molitor2005 9 months ago
@molitor2005 I've looked at videos that show the buildings of the WTC Complex after both planes hit,& I'm not so sure I believe this "missile" report. Wouldn't WTC 6 be on fire if it was hit by a missile?Or would it just explode,& then possibly smolder?However,I do remember a strange black object flying from behind the North Tower after flight 175 hit the South Tower.This object is visible in many videos,& is mysterious to me.I can't identify it.Also note:ATF also had office in the Murrah Bldg.
molitor2005 9 months ago
WTC-7 Was also on fire before the Twin Towers collapsed.
infoseeker264 10 months ago
Wasn't WTC 6 hit by falling debris from the impact of WTC 1?
VRally1997 11 months ago
@VRally1997 Wouldn't we then see impact damage, rather than what appears to be fire damage? There's no cladding/wall remnants/debris on the building...
MindSprite 11 months ago
@MindSprite Never thought of that :/ I may seem like I am going on a bit but could you give me your opinion on the following please :) What if molten aluminium alloy from the aircraft fell on the building from above as this would cause no physical damage but may cause a fire :/
VRally1997 11 months ago
@VRally1997 You're assuming there was an aircraft! But that still does not retract from your point regarding detritus. The "plane" impacted the northeast face of the North Tower, or the side you see facing the right side of the screen at 1:56--the object in question could not have fallen further from WTC6. The tower face directly above WTC6 was photographed as burning but not blown out (which-that photo is still controversial). :/
MindSprite 10 months ago
WTC 6 wasn't on fire. The image is a reflection from the World Finacial Center across the street. If you look at the right of the photo, you'll notice it's brightly shined by the sun.
debunkerman 1 year ago 4
@debunkerman That's a great point! But I'm interested in the burn damage, the blacked-out ruins of the building
MindSprite 11 months ago
First I'd heard of this. BTW, what's that great tune? Thanks.
19580909 1 year ago
@19580909
The jam is called "624 pt. 2," and it's a Nujabes/Fat Jon collaboration off one of the Samurai Champloo soundtracks. Fat Jon is the truth!!!
MindSprite 1 year ago