Added: 1 year ago
From: drpetter
Views: 7,411
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Will you release the soft ? I need for a short movie i record :) (Ark my english is too bad !)

  • That looked so sore -.-

  • God damn that music is awesome.

  • What program did you use for that?

  • @JARMOPOWER its a camera test you idiot. read the description, is a HIGH SPEED CAMERA.

  • @madlazza Oh fucking shut up if you can't read the description -.-' he SAID HE USED A PROGRAM TO INCREASE THE FPS YOU IDIOT.

  • @JARMOPOWER no he fucking didnt

  • @madlazza "with additional time distortion added using an application I wrote over the last two days. "

    Everyone wants to be a cool guy on youtube but it seems that you've failed.

  • @JARMOPOWER Why would i try to be the 'cool guy' on here. Im the cool guy in reality xD

  • @madlazza Let's just agree that both of us are cool. :) /conversation

  • @JARMOPOWER i liked that comment because its true :L

  • I need it URGENTLY! Poor animators best reference buddy!!! Cheers Petter ,)

  • Impressive!

  • drpetter is a genius, that's about all I can say at this point.

  • This is pretty sweet. Fast enough interpolation to be used in realtime?

  • @vravn Well, considering that motion vector calculation is a fixed load per source frame, independent of how many intermediate frames you insert (each one being cheap to compute), it would probably be possible to make it "realtime" if the output video ran at a normal framerate with N frames inserted between each original. My current implementation is way slower in any case, taking almost a second per processed frame. Of course I've spent very little effort on optimization though.

  • Impressive work DrPetter! Normally i walways thought slow motion was only attainable at a decent quality when using those scientific high speed cameras that work at incredible frame rates.

  • nice

  • Cool! Hehe, almost got the trick too ;)

  • Fast motion (like in normal 30 fps video) doesn't currently track very well with this method/implementation, so I'd have to do some more work before that's practical. I think it would be reasonably efficient to simply do it in multiple steps though, starting with a downscaled version of the image to track larger movement and then progressively refine it using higher resolutions.

  • Could you make one based on a normal-speed video and perhaps with before-and-after? It looks magical, and I'd love to see more of it!

  • I came up with it all on my own, but I suspect that the general concept has been known and used a lot before. Most simple and effective things have. I'll try to get an illustration up on my homepage at some point. You can keep an eye out for it.

  • Cool, have you got any more info on the analytic method you used? Is it entirely your own or based partly on a paper or something?

    Nice vid : )

  • Cool effect ! :)

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more