There is a basic structure that can serve as a map back to your own home base, so no need to re-invent the wheel there, and plenty of room for personal/original experimentation. It is Consciousness' basic goal sets and is completely and simply laid out in Level 5 of the free to download games manual, "The Resolution of the Mind". Completing this body of work allows you the luxury to pass up the "opportunity" of once again being trapped in the glorious game of being an "ascended master".
I use the Games Matrix posed by Dennis Stephens and written up in a free manual called "TROM". The process of absolutely clearing out the unconscious mind involves two simple processes PLUS the final act of leaving these types of universes and never getting sucked back in is now possible by processing the legs of the Games Matrix.
even if we go to another reality and experience fear there we snap right back to our own sense of reality. we all do this when we dream we're falling. we snap back before we hit the ground.
I just read a new book, God vs Satan Untold Story, by a new thinker on this topic. Who seems to have all these ideas, and more. He ties them into not only explaining God and Satan, but into politics, racial behavior, and modern political economical problems. If you like Campbell, you'll love the new guy.
This is probably a dumb question, but why is it that a finite system evolving toward low entropy will never reach zero entropy? Did I miss something? I'm not really to familiar with all of this...my only speculation is that individual consciousnesses don't evolve at the same time or at the same rate...but wouldn't these eventually catch up or something?
One logic that could answer your question is... everything that exist (especially consciousness) can be perceived on different degrees and each things have different poles (positive and negative) but Consciousness cannot NOT be conscious because it is consciousness. Consciousness cannot NOT exist because it is not a thin, it is everything that holds every possible thing or data.
@josieblue416 I think Campbell mentioned that Consciousness' "Not Selfs" all had differences in potential in order to have a game, in addition to the enforced limitation that the "Not Selfs" must not know about their connection with static. I therefore humbly propose that my "necessity level" to resolve the clutter in my mind, and to resolve to "read the manual" could be that I ran out of steam sooner than others: My mind is now overrun with games probabilities.
Perhaps a moronic (with a less negative connotation) level IQ is all that's truly needed for Love to rule. Perhaps anything above that level only serves to 'get in the way' and lead us elsewhere.
@PCGuit There are models of love at many levels of intellegence: puppies, bonobos, geniuses who want to give more and more constructive ideas. Evil may have it's upper limit, but Nazis like Geobbels were evil geniuses, so the upper bound is high, relative to us.
@newbetterandhappy My subjective looking shows me love is simply a lesser gross sensation on a scale of sensations. Nice, but not PRIMO! Probably as good as it can get in this universe which is why it is rated so highly here. To create is an even finer tuned sensation than love. Make a quiet space and repeat back and forth "To Love -- To be Loved" , and process what the mind brings up. The reward is expanded views and fewer love compulsions, more free "NOW" choices available.
Tolle has an optimistic viewpoint in general though,I think you would agree.The idea that love is the way,the way of least entrophy as Campbell might say,is one I find myself agreeing with.Mebbe we're hardwired that way as Dawkins etc would explain religion.
Very humbling stuff in general though,although I find the term moronic toward others a bit harsh.
Re: Collective Conciousnesses, Tolle agrees in the premise that as a rule the IQ of the collective is usually low. In my opinion most often at the moronic level.
There is a basic structure that can serve as a map back to your own home base, so no need to re-invent the wheel there, and plenty of room for personal/original experimentation. It is Consciousness' basic goal sets and is completely and simply laid out in Level 5 of the free to download games manual, "The Resolution of the Mind". Completing this body of work allows you the luxury to pass up the "opportunity" of once again being trapped in the glorious game of being an "ascended master".
ckpeltomaa 6 months ago
If you want a next action from this, go to astral pulse dot com
Contenteo 10 months ago
I use the Games Matrix posed by Dennis Stephens and written up in a free manual called "TROM". The process of absolutely clearing out the unconscious mind involves two simple processes PLUS the final act of leaving these types of universes and never getting sucked back in is now possible by processing the legs of the Games Matrix.
ckpeltomaa 11 months ago
Love! Faith! praise God
ineedaname777777 1 year ago
even if we go to another reality and experience fear there we snap right back to our own sense of reality. we all do this when we dream we're falling. we snap back before we hit the ground.
11thhourreprieve 1 year ago
I just read a new book, God vs Satan Untold Story, by a new thinker on this topic. Who seems to have all these ideas, and more. He ties them into not only explaining God and Satan, but into politics, racial behavior, and modern political economical problems. If you like Campbell, you'll love the new guy.
lindazimmer 1 year ago
DMT or Acid anyone?
crashtestmy 1 year ago
@crashtestmy yeah, I am suprised he didnt mention any of that
ethankegley 1 year ago
@crashtestmy Two tabs of mescaline would be better but shure I'll take some Acid. You got liqued or paper?
j19318 1 year ago
@j19318 no kidding lol.
puritain1 1 year ago
@crashtestmy YEEEEEEEEEEA DMT for sure. Salvia too!!!
infinitesimotel 7 months ago
HAHA HIS BEIRD JUS GOT BUSHIER. MAYBE THIS IS AN ALTERNATE DATA STREAM THAT NEVER HAPPEND YET. 1 LOVE.
Thumbs up this comment please.
thakook 2 years ago
This is probably a dumb question, but why is it that a finite system evolving toward low entropy will never reach zero entropy? Did I miss something? I'm not really to familiar with all of this...my only speculation is that individual consciousnesses don't evolve at the same time or at the same rate...but wouldn't these eventually catch up or something?
josieblue416 2 years ago
@josieblue416
One logic that could answer your question is... everything that exist (especially consciousness) can be perceived on different degrees and each things have different poles (positive and negative) but Consciousness cannot NOT be conscious because it is consciousness. Consciousness cannot NOT exist because it is not a thin, it is everything that holds every possible thing or data.
HBWKnuckles 2 years ago
@josieblue416
i'm no pro
but remember that thing from science class with ohh idk carbon or something
where you can cut it in half
a billion quadrillion times, but half of a half of a half etc
is still something
entropy is derived of consciousness i presume, and if consciousness should collapse to nothing, then so shall we and the rest of the system my friend
Conawaaay 1 year ago
Comment removed
Conawaaay 1 year ago
Comment removed
Conawaaay 1 year ago
@josieblue416 I think Campbell mentioned that Consciousness' "Not Selfs" all had differences in potential in order to have a game, in addition to the enforced limitation that the "Not Selfs" must not know about their connection with static. I therefore humbly propose that my "necessity level" to resolve the clutter in my mind, and to resolve to "read the manual" could be that I ran out of steam sooner than others: My mind is now overrun with games probabilities.
ckpeltomaa 6 months ago
The Rutherford reference he used to answer that woman's question was lame, embarrassingly bad.
scaryflakybiscuits 2 years ago
Perhaps a moronic (with a less negative connotation) level IQ is all that's truly needed for Love to rule. Perhaps anything above that level only serves to 'get in the way' and lead us elsewhere.
Interesting thought.
PCGuit 2 years ago
@PCGuit There are models of love at many levels of intellegence: puppies, bonobos, geniuses who want to give more and more constructive ideas. Evil may have it's upper limit, but Nazis like Geobbels were evil geniuses, so the upper bound is high, relative to us.
newbetterandhappy 2 years ago
@newbetterandhappy My subjective looking shows me love is simply a lesser gross sensation on a scale of sensations. Nice, but not PRIMO! Probably as good as it can get in this universe which is why it is rated so highly here. To create is an even finer tuned sensation than love. Make a quiet space and repeat back and forth "To Love -- To be Loved" , and process what the mind brings up. The reward is expanded views and fewer love compulsions, more free "NOW" choices available.
ckpeltomaa 6 months ago
@PCGuit
yes interesting indeed i've had the same thought
yet here i am with the same iq i had before and am i letting fear rule me?
who knows
but what i do know is I have to live with my iq
and you with yours
Conawaaay 1 year ago
Maybe Venerable.
Tolle has an optimistic viewpoint in general though,I think you would agree.The idea that love is the way,the way of least entrophy as Campbell might say,is one I find myself agreeing with.Mebbe we're hardwired that way as Dawkins etc would explain religion.
Very humbling stuff in general though,although I find the term moronic toward others a bit harsh.
Second
kensingtonsteel 3 years ago
Re: Collective Conciousnesses, Tolle agrees in the premise that as a rule the IQ of the collective is usually low. In my opinion most often at the moronic level.
venerablemarketing 3 years ago