When JFK ran against Cabot Lodge in 1952 he said it would be tough, because he and Lodge agreed on more issues that they disagreed. After he became President, Kennedy appointed Lodge as the U.S. Ambassador to South Vietnam.
@Boelcke1919 Political definitions change greatly. People come along with new ideas, or well rehashed old ideas, and ideas get stuck to one party or the other. Following after voting demographics positions constantly change, from year to year it isn't much but overtime it adds up. Some change quick. Which party is pro war, and which is anti war, completely swaps every ten years. Can you imagine a republican supporting starting a new war? Ten years ago the answer was very different.
@ciroalb3 Weak how so? He had a particular schedule to keep, and the allegations of inactivity were issued mostly because he was unwilling to slam the Democrats or Kennedy, and preferred to campaign on the strengths of his party, Nixon, or himself. Even newspapers from that era admit that Lodge was the candidate that excited voter attention more than both presidential candidates, Nixon and Kennedy, and more than his opposing VP candidate, LBJ.
Had he ever wanted to run, I think Lodge would've made a great president. It's a shame that it never happened, I believe he would have been one of the most succesful in foriegn policy, especially at a time when foriegn policy was extremely important.
@cyborlite to be honest, no, the same can't be said about democrats. i get sick & tired of right wing republicans justifying their party nuts by saying the democrats are just as nutty. it's not now, nor has it ever been true.
democrats have not gone off the deep end with their religious beliefs, demands for their way or the highway, or their utter hate & intolerance for others not like them (except for their dislike of the intolerant right).
He did, sort of. He was drafted for the presidency in 1964 by a write-in campaign and won several primaries as a result, including the all-important New Hampshire primary (beating such luminaries as Barry Goldwater, Richard Nixon, and Nelson Rockefeller).
When JFK ran against Cabot Lodge in 1952 he said it would be tough, because he and Lodge agreed on more issues that they disagreed. After he became President, Kennedy appointed Lodge as the U.S. Ambassador to South Vietnam.
observer9670 3 months ago
arlene francis was also originally from boston
wntoply6 5 months ago
Henry Cabot Lodge would almost be a Democrat today. Things have changed that much.
Boelcke1919 6 months ago
@Boelcke1919 Political definitions change greatly. People come along with new ideas, or well rehashed old ideas, and ideas get stuck to one party or the other. Following after voting demographics positions constantly change, from year to year it isn't much but overtime it adds up. Some change quick. Which party is pro war, and which is anti war, completely swaps every ten years. Can you imagine a republican supporting starting a new war? Ten years ago the answer was very different.
GhostInTheShell29 6 months ago
Lodge was a real man!!!!!!!!
jillsmith198845 1 year ago
He was a very weak v-p candidate, pretty inactive
ciroalb3 1 year ago
@ciroalb3 Weak how so? He had a particular schedule to keep, and the allegations of inactivity were issued mostly because he was unwilling to slam the Democrats or Kennedy, and preferred to campaign on the strengths of his party, Nixon, or himself. Even newspapers from that era admit that Lodge was the candidate that excited voter attention more than both presidential candidates, Nixon and Kennedy, and more than his opposing VP candidate, LBJ.
admiraljello 1 year ago
Had he ever wanted to run, I think Lodge would've made a great president. It's a shame that it never happened, I believe he would have been one of the most succesful in foriegn policy, especially at a time when foriegn policy was extremely important.
switchhitter07 1 year ago
a well respected moderate republican too bad these types no longer are around
KMAN6000 2 years ago 5
That is sadly true. Where are the level headed republicans now that America needs them the most.
bsnxenogear 1 year ago
@KMAN6000 thank god
jarvisthebox 11 months ago
@KMAN6000 Nixon/Lodge, the last northern liberal Republican ticket
xaviqaz 9 months ago
@xaviqaz Nixon was from California...
iown813 8 months ago
@KMAN6000 and the same can be said about Democrats.
cyborlite 7 months ago
@cyborlite to be honest, no, the same can't be said about democrats. i get sick & tired of right wing republicans justifying their party nuts by saying the democrats are just as nutty. it's not now, nor has it ever been true.
democrats have not gone off the deep end with their religious beliefs, demands for their way or the highway, or their utter hate & intolerance for others not like them (except for their dislike of the intolerant right).
cut the crap. it's nothing but bullshit & lies!
wntoply6 5 months ago
This distinguished man ran for Vice President in 1960 and lost; he should have run for President!
billyguns2 3 years ago
He did, sort of. He was drafted for the presidency in 1964 by a write-in campaign and won several primaries as a result, including the all-important New Hampshire primary (beating such luminaries as Barry Goldwater, Richard Nixon, and Nelson Rockefeller).
admiraljello 2 years ago
"a very curvaceous girl like Julie London" HAHAHA
SueBeaWho 3 years ago
man TV was so much more classier back then - people actually spoke proper english and didnt have to swear to be amusing
haasxaar 3 years ago 12
hey his great grand-dauter is my Best friend!
benchuck2 3 years ago