Hey Iran is building a Nuke for world war 3 they tell the chinese and russian even the north kroean to have a new war in the future maybe 2027 and kim jong's son is building a EMP and russia is making powrful nuclear weapons and powerful tanks to destroy america and canada in 2027 WORLD WAR 3 is called nuclear war
In history courses that I have taken, the professors all agree that the dropping of the atom bomb was necessary. After the last battle that America fought on the last island, with Japan, we realized that the Japanese people would never give up... they would never stop, so that's why we dropped the bomb, to stop WW2 from continuing in the Pacific.
I don't know if anyone knows this, but we got involved with the war after the pearl harbor bombing. The japanese were ally to germany, and bombed pearl harbor by surprise, killing many americans. We dropped the atomic bomb on them, and they DID NOT GIVE UP. We had to drop ANOTHER ATOMIC BOMB on the japanese before they surrendered
All I Can Say Is That They're Lucky They Didnt Mess With Russia... If They Would Of... None Of us Would Be Here Today, The Amount Of Nuclear Power Russia Have Is Unbelievable...Russia Is The Suburb of europe because they dont spend money on cleaning towns and cities up. OH HELL NO. They Frickin Spend It On Millions Of Tonnes Of Nuclear Power... What America Did Is Not Even A Quarter Of What Russia Could Do Just Look Up Tsar The Biggest Explosion Ever Created By USSR .......... Russia FTW
whoever made the bomb or dropped the bomb.This is horrbile and this is people dying! Instead of thinking that "this kind" of people or judging by the way someone look and thinking that that's why you/ they should kill someone or just because you met someone "different looking" that was mean dosen't mean EVERYONE is it. I,and i'm sure alot of you too , have met som pretty mean people, i mean , my bully is white , do i go around and dropping a bomb on every white person? Nope...
Of course the "Peaceful" Japanese would never have dropped one on anyone else if they made THE BOMB first right ? YEAH RIGHT GIVE ME A FUCKING BREAK...ASK THE CHINESE,KOREANS,FILIPINOS,VIETNAMESE HOW "PEACEFUL" THE JAPANESE WERE. HERE'S A TIP JAPAN...NEXT TIME DON'T START A WORLD WAR. SAME GOES FOR THE RAGHEADS IN THE MIDDLE EAST IF THEY DON'T WANT TO SUFFER THE SAME FATE.
@eddievenegas the japanese didnt start a world war. they were just responsible for getting the U.S. involved in the war. if it wasnt for the japanese bombing pearl harbor the U.S. wouldnt have gotten involved until later in the war which we could only assume that the Axis would have taken control of Europe by then. Not to mention Germany was developing the nuclear bomb.
@eddievenegas Turn you caps off. Of course the Japanese would have dropped it, if Japan had the atom bomb. Of course nearby Asian countries wouldn't have considered Japan peaceful at that time... They attacked, invaded, and annexed the people. You are just really stupid, and know some basic history. Although you truly don't know all that much, are you're just ignorant. Very ignorant.
@eddievenegas Actually it was Germany that started the war. They went to war with Brittish. The Americans only joined because the Japanese bombed pearl harbour! LEARN URE HISTORY JACKASS
@evilteddybeardotcom The Japs started the war with America by bombing Pearl Harbor ,Hawaii. The Krauts started the war in Europe you DICKHEAD. Learn to spell YOUR(not URE) HEADERBREATH.
@evilteddybeardotcom Actually if you knew history you would know that the Japanese were attacking Asia 40 years before WWII started so Japan was really the one who started it. Germany, yes in Europe, but if you really look at it Japan started WWII. WWII really had started earlier, before '39, but that is just what we put in our history books.
@eddievenegas lol fucking gringos, do you think war is like Call of duty, you die, then respawn to keep killing japs? allow me to show you something, japs killed civilians on China, Manchuria and other places around Asia, Germans killed jews, europeans, and north americans soldiers, North americans killed german and italian civilians, AS YOU MAY SAY WERE COLLATERAL DAMAGE; so everybody killed civilians, would you like to be there? on the middle east RIGHT NOW?, BEING A PART OF HISTORY?
@ssunus1 the citizens of hiroshima had nothing to do with pearl harbour or darwin it was orders of tokyo which was the the primary target but the sky was to foggy and windy so the just hit hiroshima next time think before talking
Do any of you guys know what president truman told the japanese government before the bombing ? He said, "Surender now or suffer prompt and utter destruction." I think thats pretty self explanatory. Ergo, this bombing was not an act of "terrorism", it was more like a kept promise.
As a counterpoint, in terms of absolute destructiveness and loss of life, the incendiary bombings of every major urban center in Japan far overshadow the two nuclear devices. It is a matter of the Shock, the concentration of power that overwhelms us to this day. Even after the destruction of nearly all her cities, under blockade by submarine and air dropped mines with famine and starvation imminent, Japan showed no signs of capitulating. That bomb shocked them to their senses and saved millions.
Very well done..and this Bomb saved Lifes. The inevitable Invasion of Japan would have killed many more people. Not to mention the shock value. If you are under 60, you have no idea what the world was like during a World War, and your Delicate Politically Correct Sensibilities just cannot handle the necessity of this weapon.
@FunkyTrembe and WAR is HELL, Japans Sneak Attack Strategy put the wheels in motion, and when you go to war..you go to WIN, at all cost. The BOMB(s) most definitely did indeed change the world, in many ways...but this was not a Unprovoked Lab Experiment. This was a purposeful weapon, intended, as the Gatling Gun in its day, to be so Horrific as to sour the Enemy's will to fight back. IT WORKED--and its deterrent is still working today.
However, anyone who calls this an act of terroism is an idiot. Invading the Japanese mainland would have led to hundreds of thousands if not millions more casualties than what resulted from these two bombs. The Japanese millitary was preparing school girls to charge American Soilders with bamboo sticks for crying outloud! Can you imagine the kind of bloodbath that would have resulted in? And it would've happened in every city... The Atomic Bombings were merciful.
@RCT3Enthusiast Terrorism - (the use of fear and intimidation for political gain) , still an act of terrorism , it was a way to show the emperor the nuclear fangs of the US. It was the best decision but still an act of terrorism , instead of the frontlines of Okinawa of the Philipines they chose the inland filled with civilian life, unacceptable.
@2ndCrysis it was the best decision to do, the front-lines of Okinawa....the Philippines? Why don't we bomb Michigan or Massachusetts? The bomb was dropped in august, we secured okinawa in june, we would've incinerated our own soldiers, is that a better idea? At the time we really didnt have anything to bomb other than the japanese mainland. We kind of had to unless you think it would have been a better idea to incade japan at the cost of 5,000,000 U.S. lives in the invasion ALONE
@2ndCrysis let us not forget the rest of the fighting that would consume soldiers lives like chopped meat, The japanese style of fighting then was to fight till the very end, they even started training civillians to fight, in places like okinawa, little children had bombs in their toys that would kill u.s. troops at the cost of their own life, now picture this throughout ALL of japan, total slaughter for both sides. Now ask yourself, the 2 options are killing 240,000 soldiers and civillians or
@2ndCrysis killing millions of U.S. soldiers and millions more Japanese soldiers, hell we probably would've lost too when you think about the way the japanese fight....and on top of that this was their homeland, double whammy. 2 options, the way you think 3 actually, the way your thinking right now, in bombing okinawa, is to pick an island already secured by U.S. forces and bomb the shit out of that and kill nothing but civillians and our own soldiers. 3 options, 240,000 casualties, millions
@2ndCrysis The defintion of terrorism has become quite controversal these days, and so I will not argue about that, but to condemn the bombings is ridiculous in my opinion. Aside from the industrial centers of Japan, (from which we warned the population to leave) the heart of their war machine, there was no logical target at the time. Even if we wanted to use it on Okinawa--which would have been a terrible idea--we had captured it by the time these bombs were ready anyway.
@2ndCrysis It is certainly unfortunate that major cities had to be targeted both for the obvious millitary reasons and for shock value. But indeed to for anyone to say we shouldn't have done it, that we should have instead carried out a conventional invasion of the Japanese mainland (with the Russians wrapped up in there somewhere too) is simply dumb to put it nicely. I would say that the cost would have been unimagineable, but thats simply not true, you need only look at the war europe-horrible
@2ndCrysis more people were killed in the fire bombing of tokyo than these two bombs combined and its not terrorism when bombing an enemy city during the time of war
@2ndCrysis this saved many more lives than it killed. If we didn't nuke them, we would have to invade japan, and that would bring ALOT of casualties on both sides. The bombs were for the best in the end.
@2ndCrysis this saved many more lives than it killed. If we didn't nuke them, we would have to invade japan, and that would bring ALOT of casualties on both sides. The bombs were for the best in the end.
@2ndCrysis this saved many more lives than it killed. If we didn't nuke them, we would have to invade japan, and that would bring ALOT of casualties on both sides. The bombs were for the best in the end.
@2ndCrysis this saved many more lives than it killed. If we didn't nuke them, we would have to invade japan, and that would bring ALOT of casualties on both sides. The bombs were for the best in the end.
@2ndCrysis this saved many more lives than it killed. If we didn't nuke them, we would have to invade japan, and that would bring ALOT of casualties on both sides. The bombs were for the best in the end.
@2ndCrysis They´re still looking for the ones responsible for the SEPTEMBER 11TH 2001, Irak and Afghanistan its a perfect example of their self proclaimed paper of WORLD AND CIVILIZATION SAVIORS. Why they haven´t apologized for the atomic bombs on Japan? THATS THEIR BUSSINESS CLEAN THE MESS THE PAST GOVERNMENTS HAD LEFT, AND MAYBE THE WRONGLY CALLED THIRD WORLD WOULD STOP HATING THEM. FOOLS WE GIVE YOU YOUR FOOD, YOUR OIL, YOUR COFFE, YOUR DIAMONDS, AND THEN WE¨RE THE SCUM OF EARTH.
@Weps21 Which he did because of their aggressive imperialism across the pacific... Economic sanctions are one thing. Mobilizing a large chunk of your navy and bombing the hell out of a major naval base on the soil of a foreign nation is another.
They did surrender the second time. We found proof of that in 2007"8" the japanese general did not want all those civilians dead. but the US said it was a trap and bomb em anyway.
Unfortunate yes, you really think we enjoyed doing that to other human beings? We were forced upon the act of our government. We had no say in it. People accuse U.S inhabitants for this and we have no vote on it at all. The thing is though, Japan attacked us and showing threat of domination. I do though disagree with harming those innocent people and we should have attacked their military strong points instead with smaller equipment. It stopped the war and helped the bond we have today.
Lets not forget about the Japanese Nuke program, they had allot of help from the Nazi's. After Germany surrendered a U-Boat filled with enriched Uranium and liquid mercury and modified v-4/a10 ( Advanced version of v-2 rocket) rocket parts was found by the US Navy. What about the Jap nuke tests in Korea, and why did the Soviets demanded to have that area of Korea as part of their area. Why did the Soviets shoot at marked US Aircraft over Korea, where the Jap bomb test is rumored to have occured
@IVGARIBALDIVI no there were using there own civilians to commit mass suicide to kill the us troops, by crashing their planes on purpose to hit the us warships. The japs purposely gave the troops less than a half tank of gas so that they would bomb the ships. You are very stupid. They were also the first to attack us.
Our involvement in the war wasn't over what Japan had done to Manchuria, had that been he catalyst that lead to our involvement I wouldn't be posting this reply.
Roosevelt halted oil exports to Japan because he felt if they gained too much power they may challenge the US for control of the Pacific.
The entire war was started due to the US fearing loosing control of assets and power.
Talk about Japan raping Manchuria, look at what we did to Vietnam.
Technology such as "Retardation Chutes" weren't added to bombs until later on in years and even then they're only attached to a shock-board for a short length of time.
I really think you've confused this with a MOAB.
Usually know something like a Mk.82 has an affixed tail retardation device, but that's conventional ordinance.
This was a necessary evil. And by the way, instead of showing people doing chores and laughing, they should have shown the truth, every citizen and villager preparing for an invasion. Ready to fight to the death, right down to the last man, woman, and child.
@The1Capitalist Why is it that the 9/11 attacks on America are considered acts of terrorism but a 100 plane bombing raid on Tokyo after the dropping of two atomic bombs isn’t? - the people of Japan were at the beckon of Hirohito who wanted surrender as early as Feb 1945 - the main reason for Japan's surrender was due to Soviet invasion of Manchuria and their defeat of the 1.5 million Jap Kwantong Army not the atomic bombs -
@majorgeeek wrong. The Russians only came in at the very, very, end because they wanted a piece of the pie. It took TWO Atomic Bombs for them to surrender, TWO! And what are we mind readers, we are supposed to know what's going on in the palace of the emperor. After two A-Bombs the military wanted to continue the fight, there was almost a coup d'etat, but fortunately the emperor decided to quit fearing we had a third bomb..... and he was right.
@The1Capitalist Japanese intransigence does not validate the use of atomic bombs on civilians - this is mass murder especially when strategic bombing of civilians in Europe and Japan did NOT deliver the knock out punch to force a surrender - continuing the use of strategic bombing in this manner only amounts to a war crime - the Big Six surrendered only after the Soviets knocked out their last reserve Army on Asian mainland - this is generally understated but very importatnt
@majorgeeek Notice you don't try to refute my claims. you know they are correct.
you are also correct that strategic bombing did not deliver a strategic blow, UNCONVENTIONAL weapons, A-Bombs did. And stop it with the Soviet crap, that's revisionist history and hints at intellectual bankruptcy.
@The1Capitalist bit silly to ignore the Soviets? - the Manhattan project was conducted on the basis that Russia was the enemy and Truman was so informed - Manhattan Project employees were screened for communist connections when they were hired but not for anti fascist connections - the USA intended to demonstrate its 2 billion dollar bomb to the world especially communists to make them more malleable - they had chosen Germany but when it surrendered they chose to drop it on Japan
@The1Capitalist Japs knew significance of the Soviets better than you - Hirohito was dead set against communism last thing he wanted was communism in Japan - the Soviet invasion of Japan's Kwantong Army on Aug 8 and obliteration of 1.5 million strong Japanese in Manchuria played a most significant role in the minds of the military of the Big 6 - the August Storm defeat of the Japanese meant Japan had no more reserves to fight except for what remained on the mainland Japan
@The1Capitalist the decision makers did not really consider the horrors or the morality of strategic bombing civilian targets - in fact the Tokyo bombing using conventional weapons caused more destruction than Hiroshima - the importance of the atomic bombs is overstated and not the main factor in the surrender - it became controversial and instead of the policy makers being honest about it they tried to rationalise the decision because it was not a well considered one.
@11808Clover How, then, does this act of terrorism continue to be defended almost sixty-five years later? Simple. Japan bombed Pearl Harbor. In fact, nothing U.S. forces did to Japan during the war matters because of Pearl Harbor - of the 2,400 deaths at Peal Harbor only 63 were civilians - you compare that to 500,000 civilian deaths in Japan - the US blatant acts of terrorism on Japan is much worse than the attacks of 9/11 in fact they make 9/11 look like a tame demolition job
@majorgeeek we sent them a warning, and the General ignored it, we bombed them, they still didn't surrender so a second was dropped. If pearl harbor never happened we probably wouldn't have even gotten involved in the war, and ATLEAST they chose a city that had a base to it, if they wanted to kill a lot of people they could've nuked Tokyo, it saved a bunch of lives, and had it not been dropped WW2 wouldn't have ended. Hitler would've taken over, and you would be speaking German now buddy.
@11808Clover sending a warning, not surrendering, Pearl Harbor? - all does not validate the use of strategic or atomic bombings against civilian targets - the 1000 plane attack on Tokyo following following the atomic bombings is a blatant act of terrorism look it up for yourself, and it is also mass murder and a war crime only you are too stupid to comprehend this all at once - pity
@majorgeeek Very well done..and this Bomb saved Lifes. The inevitable Invasion of Japan would have killed many more people. Not to mention the shock value. If you are under 60, you have no idea what the world was like during a World War, and your Delicate Politically Correct Sensibilities just cannot handle the necessity of this weapon.
You're the one who needs to do the research. The bombs were dropped on significant war time targets, pamphlets were dropped for weeks and weeks before they were dropped warning citizens to leave, and an ultimatum and surrender terms were given to the Imperialists. The citizens were warned, no, TOLD to leave, but hey didn't listen and got caught in the crossfire. Calling it an act of terrorism is a joke. It was a controversial call, but by no means an act of terrorism.
@SnovvVilliers ' In any war, civilians always take the most casualties. By your logic, any war is an act of terrorism' - acts of terrorism have occurred in many wars - Hiroshima, Nagasaki and the US Strategic bombings of Japanese civilians are perfect examples of terrorism
Hitler killed himself in May of 1945, the bombs where dropped in August of 1945...nice try.
I think it's funny no one thinks outside of the text books.
One bomb was a Uranium Gun-Type, the other a Plutonium Implosion-Type.
The Implosion-Type device was tested and successful design, why would we dro[ an untested design?
We didn't warn anyone, that's bull. Six optional targets had been picked, with Nagasaki being a last minuted decision in place of Kyoto due to bad weather
sigh...you commented "never punish children for the sins of their fathers. it is redundant and pointless" to wich I replied "redundant and yet it worked marvelously." IE a lot of them died and we got what we wanted, that being we scared them into surrender so we wouldn't have to go through the trouble of killing off there entire country.
@IVGARIBALDIVI No, the bomb was dropped to prevent mass loss of US troops lives. The Japanese were suicidal in warfare and had no intention of surrendering, and were prepared to fight down to the last man woman and child was dead when invaded. And don't make the horrendous loss of US lives as they burned alive in the waters of Pearl Harbor sound so casual. This actually SAVED many lives. For all you ignorant scum.
@wild50gunner we would have lost so many more troops in their suicide warfare had we not dropped that bomb. they would have sacrificed all their civilians, they were gearing them up to fight with wooden spoons if they had to in order to get a kill.
@sonotquiet sigh...you commented "never punish children for the sins of their fathers. it is redundant and pointless" to wich I replied "redundant and yet it worked marvelously." IE a lot of them died and we got what we wanted, that being we scared them into surrender so we wouldn't have to go through the trouble of killing off there entire country.
I see all people speaking bad about Japan, because Japan was Germany's "ally", but have you all thought about the way the USA, Canada and the Europeans handled things? You sure don't think we only shot people, right?
this was a terrible things that happened. no question. however, how many American soldiers would have died, and japanese, on a full scale invasion? War is dirty, mean, vile, and evil. But this is the price, sometimes. The japanese surrendered. If anyone should be upset, it should be the Japanese people at the emperor for not quitting. and these cities were industrial. if we wished for purely body counts it would have been Tokyo
i saw this exact video without the theme in my 10th grade history class and to try to block away all the horror from the video another student in the class starts sing America Fuck Yeah and the whole class was going crazy after that. lol
Japan has suffered at the hands of Truman's war crimes - the dropping of the nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki is an out right act of mass murder of innocent civilians placing Truman in the same league with other historic mass murderers like Hitler ans Stalin - also the USA remain the minority members of the Nuclear Weapons for Mass Destruction Club - and worse than Saddam , Bin Laden and Pootin
How about all of you shut the fuck up -_- none of you did nothing none of you had any part of this an your all going off of stuff other people risk there life for .
ok: he uploaded this video, because he was bored. And after this i had a bet with him about upload-views.And he said,that this video will never has 1000 views. Now he has more views then me, because i has this fucking stolen video!
Even the philippines involved =.=
badboyz123ful 11 hours ago
that was a crime against humanity! killing innocent civilians ca not be justified!
heinixxx 18 hours ago
Japan deserves another nuke
hellomoto75 1 day ago
@hellomoto75 hehe, i think Usa deserves 10 nukes.
the reason is that Usa is attacking most of countrys. u should search on Google for more info.
In Viet, u killed like the Nazi in Ww2. civillians.
Since Russia,china and more dont like Usa for what they are doing.
thecrackerboy 19 hours ago
@thecrackerboy Try harder weaboo, upset that shitty japan got what it deserved?
hellomoto75 17 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thecrackerboy Try harder weaboo, upset that shitty japan got what it deserved
hellomoto75 17 hours ago
@hellomoto75 The only thing that needs to be nuked is your house.
NewDivineWind 15 hours ago
@NewDivineWind Whats wrong weaboo, don't like hearing the truth? japan getting nuked was just hilarious.
hellomoto75 14 hours ago
this is the anonymous music :D
iibbo1 1 day ago
Hey Iran is building a Nuke for world war 3 they tell the chinese and russian even the north kroean to have a new war in the future maybe 2027 and kim jong's son is building a EMP and russia is making powrful nuclear weapons and powerful tanks to destroy america and canada in 2027 WORLD WAR 3 is called nuclear war
DiepSpartan119 1 day ago
In history courses that I have taken, the professors all agree that the dropping of the atom bomb was necessary. After the last battle that America fought on the last island, with Japan, we realized that the Japanese people would never give up... they would never stop, so that's why we dropped the bomb, to stop WW2 from continuing in the Pacific.
proeatr16 1 day ago
Ублюдки сраные они должны в аду гореть?
Andrey67571 1 day ago
I don't know if anyone knows this, but we got involved with the war after the pearl harbor bombing. The japanese were ally to germany, and bombed pearl harbor by surprise, killing many americans. We dropped the atomic bomb on them, and they DID NOT GIVE UP. We had to drop ANOTHER ATOMIC BOMB on the japanese before they surrendered
StickyNinja1 1 day ago
The real bomb had a small drogue chute, otherwise the B-29 would not have gotten away.
DrMotorDude 1 day ago
was Atom sachen Angeht hat Japan irgendwie Pech :/
GMXD1000 2 days ago
Ahhhhahahaha!!.. Ragheads.. fucking priceless! (I'm wiping tears from my eyes)
PangeaSpreads 2 days ago
Comment removed
PangeaSpreads 2 days ago
Just watched this reenactment in school today, totally crazy.
IZrocks1000 2 days ago
Что бы поставить за это видео лайк нужно быть гребаным янки!!!
89Merin 2 days ago
Now can someone explain to me why hollow points are banned in warfare.
paper000000 4 days ago
"watch me drop an atomic bomb while i play unfitting music" should have been the name of this video.
whoders 5 days ago
All I Can Say Is That They're Lucky They Didnt Mess With Russia... If They Would Of... None Of us Would Be Here Today, The Amount Of Nuclear Power Russia Have Is Unbelievable...Russia Is The Suburb of europe because they dont spend money on cleaning towns and cities up. OH HELL NO. They Frickin Spend It On Millions Of Tonnes Of Nuclear Power... What America Did Is Not Even A Quarter Of What Russia Could Do Just Look Up Tsar The Biggest Explosion Ever Created By USSR .......... Russia FTW
ABNxEdits 5 days ago
a terrible act for a good reason with a wonderful and horrendus outcome.........terrible but a neccisary lesser evil. =l
MrDavisCampbell 5 days ago
ovdgdnxfgnfgm gnxbcbxghfxgnhfgn
davi2652 5 days ago
u should of put justin beibers baby baby in the bomb when it explodes and justin beibers body falls out and hes like help me im dying
10012529et 6 days ago
whoever made the bomb or dropped the bomb.This is horrbile and this is people dying! Instead of thinking that "this kind" of people or judging by the way someone look and thinking that that's why you/ they should kill someone or just because you met someone "different looking" that was mean dosen't mean EVERYONE is it. I,and i'm sure alot of you too , have met som pretty mean people, i mean , my bully is white , do i go around and dropping a bomb on every white person? Nope...
JAMETTIZ 1 week ago
Of course the "Peaceful" Japanese would never have dropped one on anyone else if they made THE BOMB first right ? YEAH RIGHT GIVE ME A FUCKING BREAK...ASK THE CHINESE,KOREANS,FILIPINOS,VIETNAMESE HOW "PEACEFUL" THE JAPANESE WERE. HERE'S A TIP JAPAN...NEXT TIME DON'T START A WORLD WAR. SAME GOES FOR THE RAGHEADS IN THE MIDDLE EAST IF THEY DON'T WANT TO SUFFER THE SAME FATE.
eddievenegas 1 week ago 9
@eddievenegas the japanese didnt start a world war. they were just responsible for getting the U.S. involved in the war. if it wasnt for the japanese bombing pearl harbor the U.S. wouldnt have gotten involved until later in the war which we could only assume that the Axis would have taken control of Europe by then. Not to mention Germany was developing the nuclear bomb.
carljohnson3434 6 days ago
@eddievenegas Thank you
0XpVqX0 3 days ago
@eddievenegas they bomb your navy... you bomb their children with nuclear weapons... seems fare to me
dori605 1 day ago
@eddievenegas Turn you caps off. Of course the Japanese would have dropped it, if Japan had the atom bomb. Of course nearby Asian countries wouldn't have considered Japan peaceful at that time... They attacked, invaded, and annexed the people. You are just really stupid, and know some basic history. Although you truly don't know all that much, are you're just ignorant. Very ignorant.
NewDivineWind 1 day ago
@NewDivineWind So's your MAMA-SAN General Tojo.
kkepler76 15 hours ago
@kkepler76 I don't know what this is asking....
NewDivineWind 15 hours ago
@eddievenegas Actually it was Germany that started the war. They went to war with Brittish. The Americans only joined because the Japanese bombed pearl harbour! LEARN URE HISTORY JACKASS
evilteddybeardotcom 16 hours ago
@evilteddybeardotcom The Japs started the war with America by bombing Pearl Harbor ,Hawaii. The Krauts started the war in Europe you DICKHEAD. Learn to spell YOUR(not URE) HEADERBREATH.
kkepler76 15 hours ago
@evilteddybeardotcom Actually if you knew history you would know that the Japanese were attacking Asia 40 years before WWII started so Japan was really the one who started it. Germany, yes in Europe, but if you really look at it Japan started WWII. WWII really had started earlier, before '39, but that is just what we put in our history books.
NewDivineWind 15 hours ago
@eddievenegas lol fucking gringos, do you think war is like Call of duty, you die, then respawn to keep killing japs? allow me to show you something, japs killed civilians on China, Manchuria and other places around Asia, Germans killed jews, europeans, and north americans soldiers, North americans killed german and italian civilians, AS YOU MAY SAY WERE COLLATERAL DAMAGE; so everybody killed civilians, would you like to be there? on the middle east RIGHT NOW?, BEING A PART OF HISTORY?
meinfuhrer0718 9 hours ago
can't believe that humans do something like that. fuck you, humans.
Motnie 1 week ago
take that for Perl Harbor!
ssunus1 1 week ago
@ssunus1 the citizens of hiroshima had nothing to do with pearl harbour or darwin it was orders of tokyo which was the the primary target but the sky was to foggy and windy so the just hit hiroshima next time think before talking
Clanst1g 1 week ago
fassungslos so was zu sehen einfach nur fassungslos :(
DGdmBozz 1 week ago
2 Words: Holy, Shit.
SkateingItUp 1 week ago
Do any of you guys know what president truman told the japanese government before the bombing ? He said, "Surender now or suffer prompt and utter destruction." I think thats pretty self explanatory. Ergo, this bombing was not an act of "terrorism", it was more like a kept promise.
THElasvegasHUNTER 1 week ago
america fu assholes now sopa acta pipa whats next faggots smd
jony1495 1 week ago
:O
pombo39 2 weeks ago
@KimoFagima vc dá é muito o cú seu cuzão de uma porra. vai melar o pau dos outros vai
wander081 2 weeks ago
As a counterpoint, in terms of absolute destructiveness and loss of life, the incendiary bombings of every major urban center in Japan far overshadow the two nuclear devices. It is a matter of the Shock, the concentration of power that overwhelms us to this day. Even after the destruction of nearly all her cities, under blockade by submarine and air dropped mines with famine and starvation imminent, Japan showed no signs of capitulating. That bomb shocked them to their senses and saved millions.
JohnClarksc 2 weeks ago
Very well done..and this Bomb saved Lifes. The inevitable Invasion of Japan would have killed many more people. Not to mention the shock value. If you are under 60, you have no idea what the world was like during a World War, and your Delicate Politically Correct Sensibilities just cannot handle the necessity of this weapon.
Dremple 2 weeks ago
who likes this?
megaapfel 2 weeks ago
this was a big american experiment to humans
FunkyTrembe 2 weeks ago
@FunkyTrembe and WAR is HELL, Japans Sneak Attack Strategy put the wheels in motion, and when you go to war..you go to WIN, at all cost. The BOMB(s) most definitely did indeed change the world, in many ways...but this was not a Unprovoked Lab Experiment. This was a purposeful weapon, intended, as the Gatling Gun in its day, to be so Horrific as to sour the Enemy's will to fight back. IT WORKED--and its deterrent is still working today.
Dremple 2 weeks ago
However, anyone who calls this an act of terroism is an idiot. Invading the Japanese mainland would have led to hundreds of thousands if not millions more casualties than what resulted from these two bombs. The Japanese millitary was preparing school girls to charge American Soilders with bamboo sticks for crying outloud! Can you imagine the kind of bloodbath that would have resulted in? And it would've happened in every city... The Atomic Bombings were merciful.
RCT3Enthusiast 2 weeks ago 2
@RCT3Enthusiast Amen, its the devil's accounting, 250,000ish of them, vice 1 million of us, and the entire population of the home islands.
JohnClarksc 2 weeks ago
@RCT3Enthusiast Terrorism - (the use of fear and intimidation for political gain) , still an act of terrorism , it was a way to show the emperor the nuclear fangs of the US. It was the best decision but still an act of terrorism , instead of the frontlines of Okinawa of the Philipines they chose the inland filled with civilian life, unacceptable.
2ndCrysis 2 weeks ago 7
@2ndCrysis it was the best decision to do, the front-lines of Okinawa....the Philippines? Why don't we bomb Michigan or Massachusetts? The bomb was dropped in august, we secured okinawa in june, we would've incinerated our own soldiers, is that a better idea? At the time we really didnt have anything to bomb other than the japanese mainland. We kind of had to unless you think it would have been a better idea to incade japan at the cost of 5,000,000 U.S. lives in the invasion ALONE
kindertech360 1 week ago
@2ndCrysis let us not forget the rest of the fighting that would consume soldiers lives like chopped meat, The japanese style of fighting then was to fight till the very end, they even started training civillians to fight, in places like okinawa, little children had bombs in their toys that would kill u.s. troops at the cost of their own life, now picture this throughout ALL of japan, total slaughter for both sides. Now ask yourself, the 2 options are killing 240,000 soldiers and civillians or
kindertech360 1 week ago
@2ndCrysis killing millions of U.S. soldiers and millions more Japanese soldiers, hell we probably would've lost too when you think about the way the japanese fight....and on top of that this was their homeland, double whammy. 2 options, the way you think 3 actually, the way your thinking right now, in bombing okinawa, is to pick an island already secured by U.S. forces and bomb the shit out of that and kill nothing but civillians and our own soldiers. 3 options, 240,000 casualties, millions
kindertech360 1 week ago
@2ndCrysis of casualties or thousands of casualties in friendly fire, does your comment make sense now?
kindertech360 1 week ago
@2ndCrysis The defintion of terrorism has become quite controversal these days, and so I will not argue about that, but to condemn the bombings is ridiculous in my opinion. Aside from the industrial centers of Japan, (from which we warned the population to leave) the heart of their war machine, there was no logical target at the time. Even if we wanted to use it on Okinawa--which would have been a terrible idea--we had captured it by the time these bombs were ready anyway.
RCT3Enthusiast 1 week ago
@2ndCrysis It is certainly unfortunate that major cities had to be targeted both for the obvious millitary reasons and for shock value. But indeed to for anyone to say we shouldn't have done it, that we should have instead carried out a conventional invasion of the Japanese mainland (with the Russians wrapped up in there somewhere too) is simply dumb to put it nicely. I would say that the cost would have been unimagineable, but thats simply not true, you need only look at the war europe-horrible
RCT3Enthusiast 1 week ago
@2ndCrysis more people were killed in the fire bombing of tokyo than these two bombs combined and its not terrorism when bombing an enemy city during the time of war
TheGritzanator 1 week ago
@TheGritzanator So school children and bike couriers constitute the "japanese threat" ? you sound very much like George Bush
2ndCrysis 1 week ago
@2ndCrysis this saved many more lives than it killed. If we didn't nuke them, we would have to invade japan, and that would bring ALOT of casualties on both sides. The bombs were for the best in the end.
guywith3 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@2ndCrysis this saved many more lives than it killed. If we didn't nuke them, we would have to invade japan, and that would bring ALOT of casualties on both sides. The bombs were for the best in the end.
guywith3 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@2ndCrysis this saved many more lives than it killed. If we didn't nuke them, we would have to invade japan, and that would bring ALOT of casualties on both sides. The bombs were for the best in the end.
guywith3 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@2ndCrysis this saved many more lives than it killed. If we didn't nuke them, we would have to invade japan, and that would bring ALOT of casualties on both sides. The bombs were for the best in the end.
guywith3 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@2ndCrysis this saved many more lives than it killed. If we didn't nuke them, we would have to invade japan, and that would bring ALOT of casualties on both sides. The bombs were for the best in the end.
guywith3 1 day ago
@2ndCrysis They´re still looking for the ones responsible for the SEPTEMBER 11TH 2001, Irak and Afghanistan its a perfect example of their self proclaimed paper of WORLD AND CIVILIZATION SAVIORS. Why they haven´t apologized for the atomic bombs on Japan? THATS THEIR BUSSINESS CLEAN THE MESS THE PAST GOVERNMENTS HAD LEFT, AND MAYBE THE WRONGLY CALLED THIRD WORLD WOULD STOP HATING THEM. FOOLS WE GIVE YOU YOUR FOOD, YOUR OIL, YOUR COFFE, YOUR DIAMONDS, AND THEN WE¨RE THE SCUM OF EARTH.
meinfuhrer0718 9 hours ago
Justification of US hostilities against a nation that the US made hostile.
Before anyone screams about the Bombing of Pearl Harbor, read about Roosevelt's actions economically against the Japanese.
He forced the Japanese into the position and left them little recourse.
People suck up propaganda like sponges.
Weps21 2 weeks ago
@Weps21 Which he did because of their aggressive imperialism across the pacific... Economic sanctions are one thing. Mobilizing a large chunk of your navy and bombing the hell out of a major naval base on the soil of a foreign nation is another.
RCT3Enthusiast 1 week ago
@RCT3Enthusiast
bla,bla,bla...brainwashed..
MultiAsne 5 days ago
@RCT3Enthusiast
Civilian targets both Nagasaki and Hiroshima. There were military targets aplenty to choose from. Targeting civilian populations, sound familiar?
MrDeadInMyPocket 5 days ago
@MrDeadInMyPocket I've already covered this.
RCT3Enthusiast 4 days ago
@RCT3Enthusiast
Not with me you haven't. I'm a keyboard warrior. I'll hand you your ass.
MrDeadInMyPocket 2 days ago
"My God, what have we done?"
RCT3Enthusiast 2 weeks ago
Thumbs up if you think this was they asked for what they did to americans.
(And yes, I am a bad person)
Paskakatiska 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
ThreeFingerlynch 1 month ago
May the pilot the dropped that bomb... let his soul rest at an ease.
mitchell2617 2 months ago
They did surrender the second time. We found proof of that in 2007"8" the japanese general did not want all those civilians dead. but the US said it was a trap and bomb em anyway.
TheKirger 2 months ago
SAW :DDDD
Cross17891 2 months ago
Unfortunate yes, you really think we enjoyed doing that to other human beings? We were forced upon the act of our government. We had no say in it. People accuse U.S inhabitants for this and we have no vote on it at all. The thing is though, Japan attacked us and showing threat of domination. I do though disagree with harming those innocent people and we should have attacked their military strong points instead with smaller equipment. It stopped the war and helped the bond we have today.
thesecretfox1 2 months ago
Damn, i wonder who had the guts to push the button...
i wouldn't be able to handle the guilt
iwillavengeyou 2 months ago
@Defipentia and you're a douchbag! hurray!
The1Capitalist 2 months ago
@The1Capitalist
Lol, you're a ideot :-)
But it's normal for an American.
MegaJudaism 2 months ago
@MegaJudaism And you are the offspring of genocidal maniacs, but that's normal for Germans and douchbags
The1Capitalist 2 months ago
@The1Capitalist lol
11808Clover 2 months ago
@Defipentia No, its called "In a war and winning the war" Bitch
TheIsuis1 2 months ago
Awesome theme
vegasdirtbiker666 2 months ago
fuck the hole japanese
Genesis1249 2 months ago
Lets not forget about the Japanese Nuke program, they had allot of help from the Nazi's. After Germany surrendered a U-Boat filled with enriched Uranium and liquid mercury and modified v-4/a10 ( Advanced version of v-2 rocket) rocket parts was found by the US Navy. What about the Jap nuke tests in Korea, and why did the Soviets demanded to have that area of Korea as part of their area. Why did the Soviets shoot at marked US Aircraft over Korea, where the Jap bomb test is rumored to have occured
collguyjoe99 2 months ago
@collguyjoe99
Are you saying the US should be the only nation to have nuclear armaments?
All the better to scare you into submission my dear.
Weps21 2 months ago
Whoever is filming...is it safe to be that close to an active nuke?
sunseri13 2 months ago
Was that the atom bomb ?!
OobairepointoO 2 months ago
@OobairepointoO
Gun-Type Uranium-based Fusion Bomb, or as you've simply pointed out an "Atom Bomb". By any stretch it's just a early nuclear weapon.
Weps21 2 months ago
But I'm not sad to see this documentary on history channel that was what really happened and this video pretty much says it all
TheLuzezita18 2 months ago
@IVGARIBALDIVI no there were using there own civilians to commit mass suicide to kill the us troops, by crashing their planes on purpose to hit the us warships. The japs purposely gave the troops less than a half tank of gas so that they would bomb the ships. You are very stupid. They were also the first to attack us.
eranaldi9 2 months ago
@eranaldi9
Actually we forced them into a war by economically starving them of petroleum and other oil based products.
Weps21 2 months ago
@Weps21
After they had raped most of Manchuria
collguyjoe99 2 months ago
@collguyjoe99
Our involvement in the war wasn't over what Japan had done to Manchuria, had that been he catalyst that lead to our involvement I wouldn't be posting this reply.
Roosevelt halted oil exports to Japan because he felt if they gained too much power they may challenge the US for control of the Pacific.
The entire war was started due to the US fearing loosing control of assets and power.
Talk about Japan raping Manchuria, look at what we did to Vietnam.
Weps21 2 months ago
@IVGARIBALDI
eranaldi9 2 months ago
This video is not accurate. Where is the parashute that the bomb is supposed to have, in order to let the bomber plane get away from the shock wave.
trevenman 2 months ago
@trevenman the bomb dropped only at the exact point
TheLuzezita18 2 months ago
@trevenman
Technology such as "Retardation Chutes" weren't added to bombs until later on in years and even then they're only attached to a shock-board for a short length of time.
I really think you've confused this with a MOAB.
Usually know something like a Mk.82 has an affixed tail retardation device, but that's conventional ordinance.
Weps21 2 months ago
people please, dont argue about the past and the wars, we´ve already learnt (not all people) the consequenzes of these things!
Thephoenix1860 2 months ago
This was a necessary evil. And by the way, instead of showing people doing chores and laughing, they should have shown the truth, every citizen and villager preparing for an invasion. Ready to fight to the death, right down to the last man, woman, and child.
The1Capitalist 2 months ago
@The1Capitalist Why is it that the 9/11 attacks on America are considered acts of terrorism but a 100 plane bombing raid on Tokyo after the dropping of two atomic bombs isn’t? - the people of Japan were at the beckon of Hirohito who wanted surrender as early as Feb 1945 - the main reason for Japan's surrender was due to Soviet invasion of Manchuria and their defeat of the 1.5 million Jap Kwantong Army not the atomic bombs -
majorgeeek 2 months ago
@majorgeeek wrong. The Russians only came in at the very, very, end because they wanted a piece of the pie. It took TWO Atomic Bombs for them to surrender, TWO! And what are we mind readers, we are supposed to know what's going on in the palace of the emperor. After two A-Bombs the military wanted to continue the fight, there was almost a coup d'etat, but fortunately the emperor decided to quit fearing we had a third bomb..... and he was right.
The1Capitalist 2 months ago
@The1Capitalist Japanese intransigence does not validate the use of atomic bombs on civilians - this is mass murder especially when strategic bombing of civilians in Europe and Japan did NOT deliver the knock out punch to force a surrender - continuing the use of strategic bombing in this manner only amounts to a war crime - the Big Six surrendered only after the Soviets knocked out their last reserve Army on Asian mainland - this is generally understated but very importatnt
majorgeeek 2 months ago
@majorgeeek Notice you don't try to refute my claims. you know they are correct.
you are also correct that strategic bombing did not deliver a strategic blow, UNCONVENTIONAL weapons, A-Bombs did. And stop it with the Soviet crap, that's revisionist history and hints at intellectual bankruptcy.
The1Capitalist 2 months ago
@The1Capitalist bit silly to ignore the Soviets? - the Manhattan project was conducted on the basis that Russia was the enemy and Truman was so informed - Manhattan Project employees were screened for communist connections when they were hired but not for anti fascist connections - the USA intended to demonstrate its 2 billion dollar bomb to the world especially communists to make them more malleable - they had chosen Germany but when it surrendered they chose to drop it on Japan
majorgeeek 2 months ago
Comment removed
majorgeeek 2 months ago
@The1Capitalist Japs knew significance of the Soviets better than you - Hirohito was dead set against communism last thing he wanted was communism in Japan - the Soviet invasion of Japan's Kwantong Army on Aug 8 and obliteration of 1.5 million strong Japanese in Manchuria played a most significant role in the minds of the military of the Big 6 - the August Storm defeat of the Japanese meant Japan had no more reserves to fight except for what remained on the mainland Japan
majorgeeek 2 months ago
@The1Capitalist the decision makers did not really consider the horrors or the morality of strategic bombing civilian targets - in fact the Tokyo bombing using conventional weapons caused more destruction than Hiroshima - the importance of the atomic bombs is overstated and not the main factor in the surrender - it became controversial and instead of the policy makers being honest about it they tried to rationalise the decision because it was not a well considered one.
majorgeeek 2 months ago
@majorgeeek I guess the pearl harbor bombing isn't terrorism either huh, dumbass
11808Clover 2 months ago
@11808Clover How, then, does this act of terrorism continue to be defended almost sixty-five years later? Simple. Japan bombed Pearl Harbor. In fact, nothing U.S. forces did to Japan during the war matters because of Pearl Harbor - of the 2,400 deaths at Peal Harbor only 63 were civilians - you compare that to 500,000 civilian deaths in Japan - the US blatant acts of terrorism on Japan is much worse than the attacks of 9/11 in fact they make 9/11 look like a tame demolition job
majorgeeek 2 months ago
@majorgeeek we sent them a warning, and the General ignored it, we bombed them, they still didn't surrender so a second was dropped. If pearl harbor never happened we probably wouldn't have even gotten involved in the war, and ATLEAST they chose a city that had a base to it, if they wanted to kill a lot of people they could've nuked Tokyo, it saved a bunch of lives, and had it not been dropped WW2 wouldn't have ended. Hitler would've taken over, and you would be speaking German now buddy.
11808Clover 2 months ago
@11808Clover sending a warning, not surrendering, Pearl Harbor? - all does not validate the use of strategic or atomic bombings against civilian targets - the 1000 plane attack on Tokyo following following the atomic bombings is a blatant act of terrorism look it up for yourself, and it is also mass murder and a war crime only you are too stupid to comprehend this all at once - pity
majorgeeek 2 months ago
@majorgeeek Yes it does!
Miker3797 2 months ago
@Miker3797 yes the Hiroshima bombing is an act of terrorism just like 9/11
majorgeeek 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@majorgeeek Very well done..and this Bomb saved Lifes. The inevitable Invasion of Japan would have killed many more people. Not to mention the shock value. If you are under 60, you have no idea what the world was like during a World War, and your Delicate Politically Correct Sensibilities just cannot handle the necessity of this weapon.
Dremple 2 weeks ago
@Dremple I am not some delicate college drop - out because I refuse to treat the loss of human life like a statistic.
2ndCrysis 1 week ago
@majorgeeek
You're the one who needs to do the research. The bombs were dropped on significant war time targets, pamphlets were dropped for weeks and weeks before they were dropped warning citizens to leave, and an ultimatum and surrender terms were given to the Imperialists. The citizens were warned, no, TOLD to leave, but hey didn't listen and got caught in the crossfire. Calling it an act of terrorism is a joke. It was a controversial call, but by no means an act of terrorism.
SnovvVilliers 1 month ago
@majorgeeek
In any war, civilians always take the most casualties. By your logic, any war is an act of terrorism.
SnovvVilliers 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SnovvVilliers ' In any war, civilians always take the most casualties. By your logic, any war is an act of terrorism' - acts of terrorism have occurred in many wars - Hiroshima, Nagasaki and the US Strategic bombings of Japanese civilians are perfect examples of terrorism
majorgeeek 1 month ago
@11808Clover
Hitler killed himself in May of 1945, the bombs where dropped in August of 1945...nice try.
I think it's funny no one thinks outside of the text books.
One bomb was a Uranium Gun-Type, the other a Plutonium Implosion-Type.
The Implosion-Type device was tested and successful design, why would we dro[ an untested design?
We didn't warn anyone, that's bull. Six optional targets had been picked, with Nagasaki being a last minuted decision in place of Kyoto due to bad weather
Weps21 2 weeks ago
@The1Capitalist I agree
11808Clover 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
sigh...you commented "never punish children for the sins of their fathers. it is redundant and pointless" to wich I replied "redundant and yet it worked marvelously." IE a lot of them died and we got what we wanted, that being we scared them into surrender so we wouldn't have to go through the trouble of killing off there entire country.
wild50gunner 2 months ago
is it wrong that I find the sheer inacuracy of this video hilarious
wild50gunner 2 months ago
@IVGARIBALDIVI japans war crimes were just as bad as natzis and in some cases even worse they got what they deserved.
snackpackyumyum 2 months ago
@IVGARIBALDIVI No, the bomb was dropped to prevent mass loss of US troops lives. The Japanese were suicidal in warfare and had no intention of surrendering, and were prepared to fight down to the last man woman and child was dead when invaded. And don't make the horrendous loss of US lives as they burned alive in the waters of Pearl Harbor sound so casual. This actually SAVED many lives. For all you ignorant scum.
sonotquiet 2 months ago
That's right kill em japs for what they did to pear harbor
timcreason1 2 months ago
@timcreason1 never punish children for the sins of their fathers. it is redundant and pointless.
sonotquiet 2 months ago
@sonotquiet redundant and yet it worked marvelously.
wild50gunner 2 months ago
@wild50gunner we would have lost so many more troops in their suicide warfare had we not dropped that bomb. they would have sacrificed all their civilians, they were gearing them up to fight with wooden spoons if they had to in order to get a kill.
sonotquiet 2 months ago
@sonotquiet that was kind of what I was getting at
wild50gunner 2 months ago
@wild50gunner redundant means not needed or useless.
sonotquiet 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sonotquiet sigh...you commented "never punish children for the sins of their fathers. it is redundant and pointless" to wich I replied "redundant and yet it worked marvelously." IE a lot of them died and we got what we wanted, that being we scared them into surrender so we wouldn't have to go through the trouble of killing off there entire country.
wild50gunner 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is not war ,, this is a Terrorism the fuck USA they are the reall Terrorism
fadi0143 2 months ago
@jjovereats not if they were wearing sunglasses
MYXBOX1111 2 months ago
believe it or not it SAVED lives!! and lets not forget who started this mess.... dec 07 1941..... payback can and will be a bitch!
82raptor 2 months ago
I see all people speaking bad about Japan, because Japan was Germany's "ally", but have you all thought about the way the USA, Canada and the Europeans handled things? You sure don't think we only shot people, right?
ChaosChicken200 2 months ago
IDk what Fcking dump Give order to use atomic bomb u kill alot pepole.... / video great +5
Stuki777 2 months ago
@Stuki777 I don't know who taught you to spell.
11808Clover 2 months ago
this was a terrible things that happened. no question. however, how many American soldiers would have died, and japanese, on a full scale invasion? War is dirty, mean, vile, and evil. But this is the price, sometimes. The japanese surrendered. If anyone should be upset, it should be the Japanese people at the emperor for not quitting. and these cities were industrial. if we wished for purely body counts it would have been Tokyo
travis8683 2 months ago
@majorgeeek will you stop trolling on every Hiroshima video with your hippie non-sense!?
colepleshe 3 months ago
Human Ben NO Good :(
nofallyaqoo 3 months ago
The music fit so well
McNMcStudios 3 months ago
any one who saw this and survived is likely blind now.
jjovereats 3 months ago
good bomb that ended war.
tonywenwei 3 months ago
i saw this exact video without the theme in my 10th grade history class and to try to block away all the horror from the video another student in the class starts sing America Fuck Yeah and the whole class was going crazy after that. lol
pimpgoz 3 months ago
Such a badass theme to a badass event!!!!
11808Clover 3 months ago
e = mc2
18YearOld091 3 months ago
ironically, hiroshima was previously a portugese colony in Japan, and had the largest amount of Christians in the entire country
TheFifanacho 3 months ago
i don't understand the purpose of nuclear bombs...if a nuclear wars starts there IS no winning side everybody lose so what's the point
LittleRata1 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Japan has suffered at the hands of Truman's war crimes - the dropping of the nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki is an out right act of mass murder of innocent civilians placing Truman in the same league with other historic mass murderers like Hitler ans Stalin - also the USA remain the minority members of the Nuclear Weapons for Mass Destruction Club - and worse than Saddam , Bin Laden and Pootin
majorgeeek 3 months ago
nukes make look coll to you but they'll make the whole world inhabitable if there ever used
robertpenmanwc13 3 months ago
How about all of you shut the fuck up -_- none of you did nothing none of you had any part of this an your all going off of stuff other people risk there life for .
All of you are pethetic internet warriors .
EliteGhost121 3 months ago
Great music for great scene.
SuperYT4Ever 3 months ago
ok: he uploaded this video, because he was bored. And after this i had a bet with him about upload-views.And he said,that this video will never has 1000 views. Now he has more views then me, because i has this fucking stolen video!
Thephoenix1860 3 months ago
@Thephoenix1860 I'm proud of having jealous haters like you, but nevertheless you, my dear neighbour, will get a punsh in your face today.
Wenee93 3 months ago 3
Hello, Zepp. I want to play a game.
rctmonger1108 3 months ago
They should have dropped 2 :-)
jasong2xaccount 3 months ago
yay less bad drivers
zwompy 3 months ago
4 ever atomic bombs ironical i live in sweden
whthepro1337 3 months ago
or a-bomb what ever
whthepro1337 3 months ago
fuck yeah the h-bomb
whthepro1337 3 months ago
this is for pearl harbor bitch
rookiespartan 3 months ago
this month ill buy a nuclear bomb
duhavifk 3 months ago