i don't think it's the acadamy's fault - since the producers of the movie credited hutton as a supporting character, i think the acadamy is obligated to that.
@MrRazorblade999 Yes, but the Oscars have a tradition of nominating young actors or actors making their debut as Supporting Actor -- besides, he would have lost to De Niro anyway, so it worked out.
Ok. I will give it to you in simple English. Who votes? Actors vote for actors, directors vote for directors, writers vote for writers, etc. Producers get the award for best picture, and everybody votes for best picture. There are crossovers. One that acts, directs, writes and produces a picture. He can vote in all those categories. Is it more complicated than that? Yes a bit, but you got the basics. So, how did Tim Hutton win the Oscar. I gave you the answer.
@Rtmax45 What you've described is the nomination process, not the awards. Everyone with Academy membership votes for all the awards, save for a few categories that require their attendance at a screening (although this rule is more of a recent development). I think your comment is more apt as a reason why Robert Redford won Best Director-- he's an actor, and may have benefited from receiving a lot of votes from his fellow actors, the largest branch of the Academy.
I gotta say I am amazed at how active the comments are for a 30 year old academy award speech from an actor who, however good, I bet the majority of Americans under 25 probably haven't heard of.
The reason I'm here is I just watched the Twilight Zone episode "And When the Sky Was Opened," which featured a chillingly amazing performance from his dad, Jim Hutton, and read he died of liver cancer at the age of 45, not two years before Timothy thanked him while accepting this Oscar. Had to see it.
@Gunnarsas Technically it WAS a supporting role. The protagonist is in control of the storyline and plans and undertakes quests to win the super objective. The final and ultimate obstacle in this film was the mother and only the father could make the decision to overcome this obstacle. Hence, attaining the super objective of the film.
@vadimzdonutube what an absolutely ignorant remark that is...you probably weren't around when this movie came out--although the other actors were great, timothy hutton earned his award and, apparently you also aren't aware that he has been starring for years on a tv show called Leverage. Where's Pesci?
@shegotyagood who cares about tv show he starred in, he hasnt had much success after winning this oscar, joe pesci on the other hand continued to give great supporting performances such as goodfellas and casino and although he took a hiatus from acting hes back so fuck u punk
@shegotyagood you TELL them . LOL so true TIM ROCKS PESCI SUCKS sorry I DON'T LIKE his MAFIA acting ASS . He swears he is the SHIT. Don't like how he carry's himself
I'm glad Timothy won. It was a very well-deserved win. But it's been said before, I think he should've been up for Best Actor. His character had the most screentime of all the other characters in the movie and was probably the most important. But I guess they did it so that Robert DeNiro (who also gave a fantastic performance) could win. Still, both were very well-deserved.
If there is anything that can make anyone after the age of 20 feel old and like shit, it's this piece of footage. He really makes me rethink the rest of my 20's. Hmmm...masters degree maybe?
I think the Academy ought to have to put out a press release explaining in what universe Timothy Hutton's work in "Ordinary People" could be called anything other than a leading performance.
My sister Suzi Hornsby was dating Tim Hutton at this time and he was in the middle of making the movie Taps with George C Scott, Sean Penn and Tom Cruise.
THANK YOU to the other people pointing out the fact that Timothy Hutton was CLEARLY the lead in Ordinary People! I knew he'd won an Oscar, but I assumed it was for Best Actor. He has more time on screen than anyone else. The Academy must've had a problem giving the award to such a young person. Ridiculous.
@Gunnarsas Yeah, I never understood that either. They considered the parents the lead roles just because they were older or there were 2 of them or something. Oh, well, at least he won for his role!
@Gunnarsas well think about it this way: if he had been nominated in the best actor category he wouldve lost cause he was going against de niro for raging bull
Did a great job on acting the role of a tormented young man....especially in the last few minutes of movie...I have seen this yeah, umpteen times & still find that last segment difficult to watch..
Agreed Hutton's role was a lead role in the film -- however, the Academy has always been loath to award young actors just starting out a nomination for lead actor. Plus, it saved him having to lose to Robert De Niro.
Ordinary People was a fine film and it was clearly Tim Hutton's movie. Mary Tyler Moore was great in the film but hers was really a supporting role. If she had been nominated in the "Supporting Category" she probably would have won!
Tim Hutton gave a brilliant performance and justly wont he Oscar ifor Robert Redford's splendid Ordinary People, and his tribute to his late great Dad Jim Hutton moving.
@gdwme Sometimes I wonder if the Oscar's look for a way to put an actor in the Supporting categorey just so they can give awards to 2 certain people. I.e., Anthony Hopkins won for Best Actor when Heath Ledger won for Best Supporting. Eventhough I think Rourke should have won, maybe the Oscars still feel they need to earn points by giving an award to a character like in Milk.
@djade20 I was really hoping for a tie between Sean Penn and Mickey Rouke--it's happened before (with Katharine Hepburn and Barbra Streisand sharing the Best Actress Award in 1968).
I think Timothy Hutton was pushed to supporting role category because they knew Robert De Niro would win for sure.. And they thought Timothy Hutton did great job as well. I think.. BTW, I like Joe Pesci. especially in Home Alone. :-D
@Gunnarsas I could not agree with you more about Tim Hutton deserving the LEAD role award. Why do you think the academy would relegate his performance to the supporting category when it was so clearly a lead role? I think it was bias against a rookie making his feature film debut.
Hutton was totally big leagues in this film!! He deserved the Oscar (The Academy did not dare to face De Niro and Hutton - Maybe a tie would have been great). He deserves to come back with a starring role in a great movie, so we will see another acting legacy.
Okay, it sill irritates me that they showed the wrong guy as Michael O'Keefe... apart from that, can someone explain to me why he was considered "supporting" when he was practically in every frame of that film? He was the true lead of that film, and absolutely deserved his Oscar.
At age 20, he was the youngest male actor ever to win an Oscar. He still holds that record today, 30 years later. What a moving performance he gave in "Ordinary People". He thoroughly deserved his award.
@helm611 I agree that Hutton deserved the award, but it seems totally unjust that he did not win for best actor. He carried the film, and was in probably 85% of the every frame. I think it was a bias against young actors.
Thanks for posting. I consider Hutton's role as one of the best supporting performances in Oscar history. Donald Sutherland was equally great in the movie and it was strange that he didn't cup at least a nomination. It was funny how the cameraman and/or director mistook Martin Scorsese for Michael O'Keefe.
Whoever was in charge of putting the nominees on screen after they were announced should've been fired after this, that was a mess, Scorsese instead of O'Keefe, no Jason Robards.
Is that Diane Lane next to Tim Hutton? Were they an item?
hipnhappenin 2 days ago
sooo serrioouus
WishingGoldfish106 1 week ago
lol @ joe pesci at 1:26 whenMTM gets snide
timeforaction 1 month ago
lol @ joe pesci at 1:28 whenMTM gets snide
timeforaction 1 month ago
I'm confused... I thought Timothy Hutton was the main character in the film not supporting.
MyFistFullOfDollars 1 month ago
Mary Tyler Moore looks like a drag queen.
MyFistFullOfDollars 1 month ago
Timothy Hutton looks a bit like Haley Joel Osmort when he was young
dublinairportplanes 1 month ago
Scorsese should have won!
replicant1ukr 1 month ago
THAT WASN'T A SUPPORTING ROLE...IT WAS THE MAIN ROLE.........AND BTW JUDD HIRCH DESERVED IT MORE THAN HUTTON...!
SayamRajSagar 2 months ago
THAT WASN'T A SUPPORTING ROLE...IT WAS THE FUCKING MAIN ROLE....FUCK THE ACADEMY.....AND BTW JUDD HIRCH DESERVED IT MORE THAN HUTTON...!
SayamRajSagar 2 months ago
rip tim
Ivanatis 3 months ago
@Ivanatis ?? Timothy Hutton is not dead.
mdfilmguy 2 months ago
Much deserved. I think Sutherland should have been nominated for an award pertaining to his role in the film. Absolutely PROFOUND.
hyladams 3 months ago
that was not a supporting role, he was the main character!
jackattackrox 3 months ago 19
@jackattackrox
i don't think it's the acadamy's fault - since the producers of the movie credited hutton as a supporting character, i think the acadamy is obligated to that.
saar144 1 month ago
if I was Michael O'keefe I would sue the oscars and make them give me one, for that mistake.
littlenromance 3 months ago
Didn't Mary Tyler Moore's son die only a short time before this ceremony?
stitchesful 3 months ago
wow, she skipped a nominee, embarassing much....
marneebox 4 months ago
Mary's puffy shoulder nearly knocked Jack out.
AcademyAwardsPerson 4 months ago 2
He deserved the oscar for this performance, and I really appreciated the long applause for Redford. One of the best movie ever.
Tristan084 4 months ago 3
This was a remarkable film, he deserved this win.
RAG1060 4 months ago
ruffles baby!!!
joliecide 4 months ago
One of the best Oscar-winning performances in this category
Stranglehold432 5 months ago 2
Mary Tyler Moore is so scary here. Jack is scared of her.
Starkardur 5 months ago
Wasn't that actually a leading role Hutton played in Ordinary People?
MrRazorblade999 5 months ago
@MrRazorblade999 Yes, but the Oscars have a tradition of nominating young actors or actors making their debut as Supporting Actor -- besides, he would have lost to De Niro anyway, so it worked out.
christopherhoughton1 4 months ago
People can post here about who should have one a 30 year old Oscar, but my simple explanation of how the voting process is done gets canned. Funny!
Rtmax45 5 months ago
Ok. I will give it to you in simple English. Who votes? Actors vote for actors, directors vote for directors, writers vote for writers, etc. Producers get the award for best picture, and everybody votes for best picture. There are crossovers. One that acts, directs, writes and produces a picture. He can vote in all those categories. Is it more complicated than that? Yes a bit, but you got the basics. So, how did Tim Hutton win the Oscar. I gave you the answer.
Rtmax45 5 months ago
@Rtmax45 What you've described is the nomination process, not the awards. Everyone with Academy membership votes for all the awards, save for a few categories that require their attendance at a screening (although this rule is more of a recent development). I think your comment is more apt as a reason why Robert Redford won Best Director-- he's an actor, and may have benefited from receiving a lot of votes from his fellow actors, the largest branch of the Academy.
zimmermanc 4 months ago
Comment removed
Rollinsstomp82 5 months ago
He was only 19 years old when he won this award. at the time , he was the youngest man to do so.
bleachbred 5 months ago 4
@bleachbred He still is for this category.
ilovekelly75 5 months ago
I gotta say I am amazed at how active the comments are for a 30 year old academy award speech from an actor who, however good, I bet the majority of Americans under 25 probably haven't heard of.
The reason I'm here is I just watched the Twilight Zone episode "And When the Sky Was Opened," which featured a chillingly amazing performance from his dad, Jim Hutton, and read he died of liver cancer at the age of 45, not two years before Timothy thanked him while accepting this Oscar. Had to see it.
Nano0k 6 months ago
Wow. I just made the connection that Mary Tyler Moore was also IN Ordinary People... Duh...
cochranexyz 6 months ago
@Gunnarsas If it was a lead role, Joe Pesci would of won Best Supporting Actor don't you think?
Troboughbo 6 months ago
His performance in Ordinary People was outstanding. He deserves it without a doubt.
Daviysoh 6 months ago
@Gunnarsas Technically it WAS a supporting role. The protagonist is in control of the storyline and plans and undertakes quests to win the super objective. The final and ultimate obstacle in this film was the mother and only the father could make the decision to overcome this obstacle. Hence, attaining the super objective of the film.
nduchene1 6 months ago
joe pesci should have won this, no one even remembers timothy hutton
vadimzdonutube 7 months ago
@vadimzdonutube what an absolutely ignorant remark that is...you probably weren't around when this movie came out--although the other actors were great, timothy hutton earned his award and, apparently you also aren't aware that he has been starring for years on a tv show called Leverage. Where's Pesci?
shegotyagood 6 months ago
@shegotyagood who cares about tv show he starred in, he hasnt had much success after winning this oscar, joe pesci on the other hand continued to give great supporting performances such as goodfellas and casino and although he took a hiatus from acting hes back so fuck u punk
vadimzdonutube 6 months ago
@vadimzdonutube LoL. Spoken in true Pesci style.
ShelterDogs 6 months ago
@shegotyagood you TELL them . LOL so true TIM ROCKS PESCI SUCKS sorry I DON'T LIKE his MAFIA acting ASS . He swears he is the SHIT. Don't like how he carry's himself
prettychachi 6 months ago
He was so cute :)
MrZealot222 7 months ago 2
@MrZealot222 he is so HOT still to this day .. LORD mmm , mmm .. lol
prettychachi 6 months ago 2
Timothy still looks just fine to me!
carolyntenn 7 months ago 3
After they go to the next actor after Michael O'Keefe, they have Martin Scorcese in the box with Michael O'Keefe's name!
carolyntenn 7 months ago
I'm glad Timothy won. It was a very well-deserved win. But it's been said before, I think he should've been up for Best Actor. His character had the most screentime of all the other characters in the movie and was probably the most important. But I guess they did it so that Robert DeNiro (who also gave a fantastic performance) could win. Still, both were very well-deserved.
pmcmahon26 7 months ago
wow timothy was cute back in the day! lol
01scott 7 months ago
If there is anything that can make anyone after the age of 20 feel old and like shit, it's this piece of footage. He really makes me rethink the rest of my 20's. Hmmm...masters degree maybe?
DannyBoy443 7 months ago
timothy looks like the Joker these days...looks don't last...
milton2milton 7 months ago
1:26 you can tell that Joe Pesci is as excited as a schoolgirl and really wants to win. Not a very good acting job....
7beers 7 months ago
"practitioners of the art of acting" Good Lord, how pretentious can you get?
7beers 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ordinary people is the best movie I have ever seen.
Andrew197944 7 months ago
He's one of my favorite actors, so underrated.
His performance in "The Dark Half" is just breathtaking.
anton1990 7 months ago
1:40 Peter Reckell ~ "Bo" from Days of Our Lives over Huttons right shoulder. LOL
gsxrbuckeye 7 months ago
@gsxrbuckeye No it's not Bo from Days, it looks him a little.
RAG1060 4 months ago
He looked so much like his dad Jim Hutton here....
untitleme61 8 months ago
Awww, look at him! He was a baby!
straightuphustlaaa 8 months ago
Whoa, Timothy Hutton was a fox!
LittleVegas 8 months ago 3
Anyone else notice that the Michael O'Keefe caption is actually Scorcese
citykid33 8 months ago 19
the girl next to him was like "My man!! " lol
sunstar465 8 months ago
@sunstar465 Diane Lane!
TheOGKSJ 8 months ago 2
@sunstar465 that girl is none other than Diane Lane who is married to Josh Brolin! she was so young and pretty then.
truediabolique69 7 months ago
I think the Academy ought to have to put out a press release explaining in what universe Timothy Hutton's work in "Ordinary People" could be called anything other than a leading performance.
soaphunks 8 months ago
yet another oscar jinx victim
vadimzdonutube 9 months ago
wow...heartthrob much? what happened to him? lol
MDkid1 9 months ago
@Gunnarsas I've also always thought this. I've never understood why it was classified as a "supporting role."
stitchesful 9 months ago
Oh my goodness, the way he reacted in receiving the Oscar seems to reflect his great performance!
expressivechild 9 months ago
Michael O' Keefe looks alot like Scorsese!
shawthingfilms 10 months ago
Wow. Michale O'keefe changed his looks to Martin Scorsese. What a talented robot!!!
singingindark12 10 months ago 2
Wow. Michael O'keefe's changed his looks to Martin Scorsese at the moment. What a talented robot!!!
singingindark12 10 months ago
It's weird to think that the writer of Ordinary People also wrote Spiderman.
bigsleep32 10 months ago
My sister Suzi Hornsby was dating Tim Hutton at this time and he was in the middle of making the movie Taps with George C Scott, Sean Penn and Tom Cruise.
Mineretta2012 10 months ago
They made him run in the supporting category because Robert De Niro was running for best Actor that year in Raging Bull.
ninethreefivesix 10 months ago
One of my favorite male acting performances of all time. Timothy Hutton was
simply transcendent in ORDINARY PEOPLE, and to have been such a novice
at the time made it all the more stunning. He should have went on to be a great
star, but I think he was more interested in being a "Serious Actor."
JOJO22858 10 months ago
he's a bit like haley joel osment..
chozhuryo 11 months ago
lol i love pesci's reaction to moore right before she reads huttons name XD
hes like "this broad for real?" lol
timeforaction 11 months ago
hes adorable
Patricia4able 11 months ago
timothy is sooo cute !!!!
Patricia4able 11 months ago
Great! But why wasn't Donald Sutherland nominated???
SuperHeroMania 11 months ago
THANK YOU to the other people pointing out the fact that Timothy Hutton was CLEARLY the lead in Ordinary People! I knew he'd won an Oscar, but I assumed it was for Best Actor. He has more time on screen than anyone else. The Academy must've had a problem giving the award to such a young person. Ridiculous.
blizzaire08 11 months ago
this was not a supporting part. he was the lead. the oscars are a joke.
owg59 11 months ago
@owg59 HE could have refused the nomination many have had their names pulled after being snubbed in a leading catagory role
etrax2000 11 months ago
Joe Pesci ended up winning in this category 10 years later for Goodfellas.
mrberryv 1 year ago
@Gunnarsas Yeah, I never understood that either. They considered the parents the lead roles just because they were older or there were 2 of them or something. Oh, well, at least he won for his role!
mmg1195 1 year ago
@Gunnarsas Well, there was no way that De Niro was going to lose for Raging Bull that year.
EricAKATheBelgianGuy 1 year ago
@Gunnarsas well think about it this way: if he had been nominated in the best actor category he wouldve lost cause he was going against de niro for raging bull
at least he got something
inrwizards 1 year ago
I was touched by his performance in Ordinary People. He totally deserved it.
Daviysoh 1 year ago
@Gunnarsas Exactly. I Never Understood Why They Did That. It Must Have Been Politics Or Something..
renues 1 year ago
Hutton Over Pesci? I Don't Think So. It Was A Leading Role Anyway. Great Chemistry With Jack And Mary...
renues 1 year ago
Timothy Hutton looks so adorable in this clip.
collagediva 1 year ago
I like how they put Martin Scorsese in Michael O' Keefe's place.
Troboughbo 1 year ago 8
This is probably the most endearing thing I've ever seen...
antebellum 1 year ago
Why is marty scorsese's face on screen with michael o'keefes name below it?
Marty01Mcfly 1 year ago 3
Did a great job on acting the role of a tormented young man....especially in the last few minutes of movie...I have seen this yeah, umpteen times & still find that last segment difficult to watch..
MultiCgp 1 year ago
I think his father died a few months before this
jojopuppyfish 1 year ago
Agreed Hutton's role was a lead role in the film -- however, the Academy has always been loath to award young actors just starting out a nomination for lead actor. Plus, it saved him having to lose to Robert De Niro.
christopherhoughton1 1 year ago
love his handshake and bow towards Robert Redford at 1:43 - very decent!
kalurank 1 year ago
@kalurank The handshake was very nice but he tripped and Redford was sitting down so he had no choice BUT to bow! Still a great moment.
andy65guitar 1 year ago
Hahahaha. He was so cute and nervous. The award was well deserved. He did an exceptional job in one of my favorite films.
WLegacy30 1 year ago
favoloso film ogni volta che lo vedo mi metto in discussione
Fulk3000 1 year ago
Was that Ally Sheedy and Diane Lane sitting next to Hutton?
1sababoy 1 year ago
@1sababoy don't know but it's Diane Keaton behind him!
kalurank 1 year ago
Thanks for posting this, I always wanted to see this moment.
humboldt777 1 year ago
Ordinary People was a fine film and it was clearly Tim Hutton's movie. Mary Tyler Moore was great in the film but hers was really a supporting role. If she had been nominated in the "Supporting Category" she probably would have won!
larkpraise 1 year ago
aww Tim sounded so nervous and young. And thanking his dad.
PhillyGirl1 1 year ago 4
he was adorable then, but he's absolutely handsome now. ;)
skor220 1 year ago 2
Tim Hutton gave a brilliant performance and justly wont he Oscar ifor Robert Redford's splendid Ordinary People, and his tribute to his late great Dad Jim Hutton moving.
ToughXArmy69 1 year ago
Why is it for Michael O'keefe they showed Martin Scorsese lol
deenzilla 1 year ago
Michael O Keefe looks like Robert De Niro.. :DD
Iker122 1 year ago
I didn't even know he was an Oscar winner. I didn't know he was so gorgeous even back then.
noxyxxx 1 year ago
He did belong in Best Actor but so did Donald Sutherland who was the shocking omission that year. DeNiro completely deserved the Oscar though.
The whole cast of OP deserved the SAG which I don't think they won.
gdwme 1 year ago
@gdwme Sometimes I wonder if the Oscar's look for a way to put an actor in the Supporting categorey just so they can give awards to 2 certain people. I.e., Anthony Hopkins won for Best Actor when Heath Ledger won for Best Supporting. Eventhough I think Rourke should have won, maybe the Oscars still feel they need to earn points by giving an award to a character like in Milk.
djade20 1 year ago
@djade20 I was really hoping for a tie between Sean Penn and Mickey Rouke--it's happened before (with Katharine Hepburn and Barbra Streisand sharing the Best Actress Award in 1968).
harrietamidala1691 1 year ago
@gdwme Of course they didn't, those awards were created in the mid-1990s.
zim83 1 year ago
@gdwme the SAG awards were inaugurated in 1994, so you are right why OP did not win anything there.
mahjongazian 1 year ago
Gee michael o keefe looks a lot like Martin Scorcese! LOL
getoutofmyway01 1 year ago
@Gunnarsas
I think Timothy Hutton was pushed to supporting role category because they knew Robert De Niro would win for sure.. And they thought Timothy Hutton did great job as well. I think.. BTW, I like Joe Pesci. especially in Home Alone. :-D
singingindark12 1 year ago
two actors from the same movie nominated for the same role = aaawwwkward. why did judd show up? he must have had an idea how the night would turn out
buffilms 1 year ago
Very, very deserved. His Conrad Jarrett is one of the best winning performances of all time.
zim83 1 year ago
i think the studios decide where they want their actors to go in the nominee slots, the OP producers probably had Donald Sutherland up for lead actor
longview1987 1 year ago
Good to see he never went anywhere after the 80's. /eyeroll. He needs real work, he's very talented.
KRKahn87 1 year ago
@Gunnarsas I could not agree with you more about Tim Hutton deserving the LEAD role award. Why do you think the academy would relegate his performance to the supporting category when it was so clearly a lead role? I think it was bias against a rookie making his feature film debut.
pitbull103 1 year ago
Hutton was totally big leagues in this film!! He deserved the Oscar (The Academy did not dare to face De Niro and Hutton - Maybe a tie would have been great). He deserves to come back with a starring role in a great movie, so we will see another acting legacy.
elmelapelas 1 year ago
Okay, it sill irritates me that they showed the wrong guy as Michael O'Keefe... apart from that, can someone explain to me why he was considered "supporting" when he was practically in every frame of that film? He was the true lead of that film, and absolutely deserved his Oscar.
MissLizaMay 1 year ago
@MissLizaMay Lol. That wasn't just the wrong person, that was Martin Scorsese!
explevel2 1 year ago
Sad how his career ended up going.
zacflem 1 year ago
At age 20, he was the youngest male actor ever to win an Oscar. He still holds that record today, 30 years later. What a moving performance he gave in "Ordinary People". He thoroughly deserved his award.
helm611 1 year ago 2
@helm611 I agree that Hutton deserved the award, but it seems totally unjust that he did not win for best actor. He carried the film, and was in probably 85% of the every frame. I think it was a bias against young actors.
pitbull103 1 year ago 2
lol.....Pesci looks like he's 25
thegoosebrain 1 year ago
Very sweet tribute by Tim to his father, actor Jim Hutton, who died suddenly around the time Tim was filming Ordinary People, at just 45 years old.
smichelle65 1 year ago 2
Michael O' keefe...yum
headwiper 1 year ago
I didn't know Michael O'Keefe was Martin Scorsese's alter ego.
abluecarrot1 1 year ago 4
@abluecarrot1 :) I noticed the same thing
getoutofmyway01 1 year ago
Joe Pesci had hair once?
KleWdSide 1 year ago
1. Why is Scorsese in O'Keefe's box?
2. Wrong category, Timothy, but if you had beaten De Niro I would've puked, so maybe this is a good thing.
S13AR10AFan 1 year ago
Wow...Timothy Hutton was absolutely gorgeous back then, wasn't he?
*swoon*
StewieGriffin2009 1 year ago 65
@StewieGriffin2009 yes he was !!
SStephane09 1 year ago
@StewieGriffin2009
Maybe because he was only 20 years old? A child.
thegoosebrain 1 year ago
@StewieGriffin2009 YES!
shnooger 1 year ago
@StewieGriffin2009 yes, he was so hot back then. why must people grow old? ugh !
SexyStudChris 10 months ago
NATE FORD!!
soggynuggets99 1 year ago
Diane Lane is sitting next to timotthy Hutton.she was 16 at that time.she looks so pleased.
mensahcarrelle 1 year ago 3
God he was gorgeous. I will never watch Leverage the same way again.
dramamole 1 year ago 3
Was that Diane Lane sitting next to Timothy Hutton?
saveangel 1 year ago
@saveangel yes.
she was his girlfriend at that time
mensahcarrelle 1 year ago
Why on earth is Scorsese pictures in a box with Michael O'Keefe's name? hahaha
shawthingfilms 1 year ago 2
Timothy was brilliant in this role...one of the greatest performances on film.
I feel bad for Michael O'Keefe, as the camera is on some other guy the entire time!
KellyGreen5555 1 year ago
The other guy is Martin Scorsese
bigjoetube 1 year ago
He totally deserved the win. Probably one of, if not the greatest acting performances I have ever seen.
pmcmahon26 1 year ago
i have been waiting for this clip to show up online forever. what a beautiful performance he gave, and what a well deserved win.
alwy15 1 year ago
I didn't know Martin Scorsese was Michael O'Keefe
abluecarrot1 1 year ago
Michael O'Keefe looks shockingly like Martin Scorsese.
stanveg 1 year ago 2
Yay! FINALLY! Thank you so much for posting :)
CJLOVE23 1 year ago
Simply... the best winner of the category. He was not very supporting tough, he was pretty much leading. But I'm very happy he won an Oscar for it.
dinasztie 1 year ago
Timothy Huttton actually was the lead actor in "Ordinary People".
missuniworld 1 year ago
@missuniworld no its robert redford
blahbillo 1 year ago
who knew timothy hutton was this young once... :)) and dashing, positively dashing!
armida55 1 year ago
Thanks for posting. I consider Hutton's role as one of the best supporting performances in Oscar history. Donald Sutherland was equally great in the movie and it was strange that he didn't cup at least a nomination. It was funny how the cameraman and/or director mistook Martin Scorsese for Michael O'Keefe.
robrichpo 1 year ago
is it just me or did they screw up and focus the camera on Marty Scorsese and label it Michael O'Keefe????
CitzenVain714 1 year ago
Whoever was in charge of putting the nominees on screen after they were announced should've been fired after this, that was a mess, Scorsese instead of O'Keefe, no Jason Robards.
deanriam 1 year ago
@deanriam Well, Jason Robards wasn't there that night.
EricAKATheBelgianGuy 1 year ago
@EricAKATheBelgianGuy They still put a picture of the actor if he's not present.
deanriam 1 year ago
se equivocaron en colocar la imagen de Michael O'keefe y colocaron a Martin Scorcese.
marioxfilms 1 year ago
And by Michael O'Keefe they mean Martin Sorcese apparently.
vinnayt 1 year ago
He was so young, cute, and great in that movie! Very touching when he thanked his father. Look out for the teenaged Diane Lane next to him.
P.S. Why is Martin Scorsese's face shown for Michael O'Keefe's box?
Tigerlily21 1 year ago
Never seen Timothy Hutton this happy/relaxed, he's super cute!
henrysinaga 1 year ago
he totally deserved it for that great role
paint9er 1 year ago