I went to college in the mid 70's if there was gov. money I didn't know about it, just worked the summers and paid my way, no big deal . What has changed, kids can't work there way through any more and they learn nothing.
Yes, it has made a bubble - but to pop it all at once, what are the consequences? This woman already will have her kids through with great debt. Then they'll be protesting that the cost is less so the gobbermint should bail them out. The ones that can't get an education (because the government won't pay for it), and will be really angry that they can't get those high incomes, like their older siblings. And why is the gobbermint paying to make kids get LOANS - not grants?
Wow. I never looked at it that way before Dr. Paul. Thank you for educating me. Now I have ammo to fire back at people who say it's "LUDICROUS" to get rid of the Dpt. of Education.
RON PAUL 2012 If Dr. Paul had been voted into Office in 2008, think how much better this Country would be right now. In every way. And think of all the troops killed in the wars that were tailor-made for war profiteers, that would still be here for their families.
BRING RON PAUL back to WASHINGTON-------------------------------------------------
AS PRESIDENT - thus, in YOUR STATE, in the GOP PRIMARY VOTE, if you support Dr Paul, register GOP & vote in state Primarys. WHEN Dr Paul wins in state primarys he will become the GOP opponent to BHO in 2012. BEATING -- BHO --- is the EZ part ----- go register ----- go vote ----- RON PAUL
Without the student loans the collages will have to bring costs down or go out of business. Maybe we can lay off all the communist educators and get some teaches interested in teaching instead of indoctrinating. BTW The good Doc is not ending federal student loans. Congress will have to do that and they will not so don't worry about it.
He said PHASE it out. And soon Congress will have to listen to the PEOPLE and not big business. So no it will be phased out and it will happen. And lets cut the crap. Now people want to start bringing up what congress is needed to do? After all the illegal wars? Lets stop the crap. I am sick of hearing what congress needs to approve. Because if that was the case than we would not be a 10 year war.
Student loans have no doubt risen the price of student tuition, but just abolishing the federal student loan programs wouldn't reduce the cost of education, and if my opinion it would only go through the roof. I'm sure the private sector would love to see federal loans abolished so they could have free rain over providing loans, and would then have more incentive to try and drive up the price of an education. There has to be regulation (Ron Paul regulation, lol), otherwise this plan would fail.
@langox510x All the fed does is guarentee the loans for the most part. This allows lenders to make loans with no risk of loss. This allows schools to jack their tuition up to the limits that the (artificial) market allows. With out these guarentees the banks would not so freely lend. Common sense dictates that the schools would have to lower their tuition to the new lower limits of lending.
You say " There has to be regulation (Ron Paul regulation, lol), otherwise this plan would fail".
The student loan "plan" IS failing. What do you think all the talk is about in the media? The question being asked is how it can be saved. Look up Peter Schiff - he is the economist that also predicted all this housing and student loan mess. He backs up Ron Paul on the student loan solution.
@talkinternet4 I know it is failing, but to withdraw federal student loans and kill regulation as Ron Paul would like to see would make those issuing student loans rich, and the price of education would skyrocket at a far greater rate than what we are witnessing today. These banks would influence the price of a student education in their favor and the people would suffer far greater than they ever had in the first place. Less regulation is only in the interest of the corporation.
@langox510x The missing part of your analysis is that Ron Paul wants to make the shift from Government regulations that cause the problem, to stricter market place regulations that would keep the banks in check. In other words -- if the Banks had got themselves into this mess without the governments interference, then THEY would be at the risk of losing $1T dollars --- instead of the tax payers. You really thing they would have done that if left to the free market regulations?
@langox510x Your characterization of Ron Paul's plan appears to be incorrect as well. He has a plan to transition out of the mess. He understands perfectly the dangers of killing things day one, and is sympathetic to the students that have been caught up in the scam. That is why he has not included the student loans issue in his initial plan. He wants to get them jobs first and get a stronger economy before dealing with these things.
@langox510x I guess the first thing I should have asked you was - what is the regulation that you think would be so important that the free market wouldn't automatically address?
Ron Paul was against the repeal of Glass-Steagall because repealing it would be partial deregulation. Glass-Steagall was important to protect from another regulation. Instead of me trying to explain in a few words see: watch?v=6rDt6bmRqLc
I went to college in the mid 70's if there was gov. money I didn't know about it, just worked the summers and paid my way, no big deal . What has changed, kids can't work there way through any more and they learn nothing.
krosst55 2 months ago
As for ethnics against Dr. Ron Paul
here is a multi -racial women speaking up for his views
she is a black/jew mix
she doesnt HATE Dr. Paul
hoo is trying to make all of us think blacks hate Dr Paul ?
hoo has a lot to lose if he becomes presi?
blacks stand a lot to gain
that leaves hoo?
sophiah88 2 months ago
Yes, it has made a bubble - but to pop it all at once, what are the consequences? This woman already will have her kids through with great debt. Then they'll be protesting that the cost is less so the gobbermint should bail them out. The ones that can't get an education (because the government won't pay for it), and will be really angry that they can't get those high incomes, like their older siblings. And why is the gobbermint paying to make kids get LOANS - not grants?
Mremma14567 2 months ago
Wow. I never looked at it that way before Dr. Paul. Thank you for educating me. Now I have ammo to fire back at people who say it's "LUDICROUS" to get rid of the Dpt. of Education.
BoDiggety 2 months ago 3
RON PAUL 2012 If Dr. Paul had been voted into Office in 2008, think how much better this Country would be right now. In every way. And think of all the troops killed in the wars that were tailor-made for war profiteers, that would still be here for their families.
darlingUSA1 2 months ago 3
Well, you're never hearing from her again.
ChronoTriggerMusic 2 months ago
smart lady
ricsenTV 2 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
If you are angry at the media, for ignoring Ron Paul and the American people let them know
FOX News room – 212-301-3344
FOX news radio 212-301-5800
CNN news desk 404-827-2751
CNN news desk fax: 404-827-3368
MSNBC – 212-664-3720
ABC News – 212-456-7777
CBS News – 212-975-4321
CBS News fax – 212-975-1893
napalmvoododaddy 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He is definitely better in Economics and use of ecomomics for benefitting everyone
He is definitely a better humanist by being anti-war
He is definitely better at analyzing the bias in laws and enforcement of laws against minority
He is definitely better in improving medical care ..for starters proposing a better patient-doctor realtionship, etc.
A much better legilator
But above all, he is definitely way better in speaking the TRUTH!
Lets us elect him as POTUS
LORDOFWARS8 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you think we need student loans Youtube this; College Conspiracy
Vote4RonPaulLiberty 3 months ago
The time for Ron Paul is NOW
ddepos14 4 months ago 21
wow --- i know this anchor is such a hater on Ron Paul. oh and he says nothing after the pro ron comment ... JACKASS
OvergrowDaGovernment 4 months ago
BRING RON PAUL back to WASHINGTON-------------------------------------------------
AS PRESIDENT - thus, in YOUR STATE, in the GOP PRIMARY VOTE, if you support Dr Paul, register GOP & vote in state Primarys. WHEN Dr Paul wins in state primarys he will become the GOP opponent to BHO in 2012. BEATING -- BHO --- is the EZ part ----- go register ----- go vote ----- RON PAUL
charles43110 4 months ago
Without the student loans the collages will have to bring costs down or go out of business. Maybe we can lay off all the communist educators and get some teaches interested in teaching instead of indoctrinating. BTW The good Doc is not ending federal student loans. Congress will have to do that and they will not so don't worry about it.
ilkhanX 4 months ago 2
@ilkhanX
He said PHASE it out. And soon Congress will have to listen to the PEOPLE and not big business. So no it will be phased out and it will happen. And lets cut the crap. Now people want to start bringing up what congress is needed to do? After all the illegal wars? Lets stop the crap. I am sick of hearing what congress needs to approve. Because if that was the case than we would not be a 10 year war.
pwih1987 4 months ago
Student loans have no doubt risen the price of student tuition, but just abolishing the federal student loan programs wouldn't reduce the cost of education, and if my opinion it would only go through the roof. I'm sure the private sector would love to see federal loans abolished so they could have free rain over providing loans, and would then have more incentive to try and drive up the price of an education. There has to be regulation (Ron Paul regulation, lol), otherwise this plan would fail.
langox510x 4 months ago
@langox510x All the fed does is guarentee the loans for the most part. This allows lenders to make loans with no risk of loss. This allows schools to jack their tuition up to the limits that the (artificial) market allows. With out these guarentees the banks would not so freely lend. Common sense dictates that the schools would have to lower their tuition to the new lower limits of lending.
jaker277 4 months ago 2
@langox510x Your funny.
You say " There has to be regulation (Ron Paul regulation, lol), otherwise this plan would fail".
The student loan "plan" IS failing. What do you think all the talk is about in the media? The question being asked is how it can be saved. Look up Peter Schiff - he is the economist that also predicted all this housing and student loan mess. He backs up Ron Paul on the student loan solution.
talkinternet4 3 months ago
@talkinternet4 I know it is failing, but to withdraw federal student loans and kill regulation as Ron Paul would like to see would make those issuing student loans rich, and the price of education would skyrocket at a far greater rate than what we are witnessing today. These banks would influence the price of a student education in their favor and the people would suffer far greater than they ever had in the first place. Less regulation is only in the interest of the corporation.
langox510x 3 months ago
@langox510x The missing part of your analysis is that Ron Paul wants to make the shift from Government regulations that cause the problem, to stricter market place regulations that would keep the banks in check. In other words -- if the Banks had got themselves into this mess without the governments interference, then THEY would be at the risk of losing $1T dollars --- instead of the tax payers. You really thing they would have done that if left to the free market regulations?
talkinternet4 3 months ago
@langox510x Your characterization of Ron Paul's plan appears to be incorrect as well. He has a plan to transition out of the mess. He understands perfectly the dangers of killing things day one, and is sympathetic to the students that have been caught up in the scam. That is why he has not included the student loans issue in his initial plan. He wants to get them jobs first and get a stronger economy before dealing with these things.
talkinternet4 3 months ago 4
@langox510x I guess the first thing I should have asked you was - what is the regulation that you think would be so important that the free market wouldn't automatically address?
talkinternet4 3 months ago 6
@talkinternet4 Nothing. The most important regulation was probably Glass-Steagall, the repeal of which Ron Paul was against.
Otzmatron 2 months ago
@Otzmatron
I can't tell if you already know this or not but,
Ron Paul was against the repeal of Glass-Steagall because repealing it would be partial deregulation. Glass-Steagall was important to protect from another regulation. Instead of me trying to explain in a few words see: watch?v=6rDt6bmRqLc
talkinternet4 2 months ago
GOSH can you afford gas? Real insight into the discussion jackass.
AesirV 4 months ago 2