Added: 2 years ago
From: yourboycal
Views: 19,925
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (232)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Einstein was a fraud who stole other peoples work and patched it together to create a monstrosity that is entirely POINTLESS since it only serves to answer hypothetical questions (eg: 'what would happen if the sun disappeared' -> note how that is untestable and as dumb as wondering how many angels fit on a pin)

    This propaganda fluff piece has a deceptive title, as Newton is NOT PROVED WRONG (his shit is actually useful to engineers @NASA). The video actually tries to prove Einstein, but fails.

  • @betterinfos atomic energy , gps , Brownian motion , satilite calculations based on his special and general relativity etc. He did alot , you can't take that away from the man and call him a fraud who stole other peoples work lol . What evidence do you have for this ? just because he worked at a patent office? sure seems easy doesn't it , and with winners writing history and what not lol . But no , i don't believe he did. What about newtons calculations to moon ? it was off no?

  • @yourboycal You are so lame. Einstein was a vile man and a plagiarizer: /watch?v=-y09KQxcSjc

    => if you bothered to look past the mainstream message, you would see that there is much reason to disrespect Einstein. Don't give me the zionist propaganda about their 'intellectual hero', who is in fact no better than Bernie Madoff. All image, no desirable substance = pathetic individuals.

  • @betterinfos Already seen that series including the facist soup website. Although it has many intersting points hardly proves your claims. Einstein has done alot more then most of the electric universe proponents have brought forth. Why don't you get your little buddies to put together a experiment and show me more evidence instead of hearsay ? einstein has put forth many experiments to show his theories in practice and math. Can you do the same?

  • @betterinfos "=> if you bothered to look past the mainstream message, you would see that there is much reason to disrespect Einstein"

    there is no reason to disrespect any human being , regardless of there actions. You will just be as ugly as them. Can you tell me how much you have done compare to einstein?

  • @yourboycal I can easily tell you what I haven't done: support Israel, be a hateful Zionist, or help build atomic weapons that were used to murder hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians in a country that was already beaten. What a disgrace!

    While you profess to respect everyone (and hence remove all meaning from the term, idiotically enough), I realize that moral censure is important, and even more: that truth benefits all good-minded people. Call a spade a spade.

  • @betterinfos You don't have turth, you have half truths mixed into your own version of a truth. I've asked many people on the internet , if you don't believe in einsteins theories thats fine. But where is yours? Bring your forth and produce some experiments that flip the s.r ,and g,r on its head ? But they all they do is go back to their armchairs and critize more without anything else to replace it . Come get your nobel , and prove scientifically that einstein was wrong. To hard?

  • @yourboycal As if a scientist needs to produce an alternate model, when faced with a model that simply doesn't work (unless you add BS dark matter and dark energy, or ignore quasars, the presence of faster than light particles, etc.). What you say is simply absurd.

    And seriously: LOL @ your pathetic Nobel prize. Certainly the prize is awarded frequently to valid researchers, but Obama's peace prize? hahahahahaha. Einstein's is equally politically motivated and suspicious, IMO.

  • @betterinfos yea anything dark in science to me , means "we don't know" . yes quasars are quite the little buggers , with spin rates that seem to defy c. I don't ignore them i keep them in mind. I don't accept all einstein theories , heance the title of the video. But to go around bashing the man , because there seems to be some contradictions to his theories , is silly. Science is not 100 percent no? a work in progress , always adjusting it self to new data etc?

  • @betterinfos Obama did not deserve a nobel , thats for sure . Not sure who dropped that ball on that play and actually approved it . I wonder how he sleeps at night , knowing he gave a peace prize , to another psychopath in high political power , who said he would bring us change, but brought us the same old except way more expensive and far more dangerous to the future generations. Oh the burden we are leaving them , yet we continue to go about the day like its not big deal sigh...

  • @betterinfos "I haven't done: support Israel, be a hateful Zionist, or help build atomic weapons that were used to murder hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians in a country that was already beaten. What a disgrace!"

    Yes what a disgrace indeed, but did einstein not write a letter to the president and warn him of the dangers of it ? Of course its a disgrace. and i'm not no zionist fan either , they are a pretty big branch of the ugly evil tree

  • I dont get this vid at all ! First of all just want to say its very well put together and well worth watching. What I dont get is the title "Newton and Einstein,perhaps both wrong". HOW are they wrong ? This wasnt discussed in the vid.

  • Molto bello!

  • Venus, Chase Mercury!

  • Neutrinos are nothing more than a different name for Aether. Einstein hindered science & his views benefited the industrial complex. The greatest minds believed in Aether regardless what it was called, & also various types of Aether.

  • 7:05 so thats why they chose that Effect for Assassins creed's transitions. lol

  • to travel faster than light . neutrinos would have to be mass less, but neutrinos have little mass...how is this so ? maybe the neutrino's mass is borrowed from it being faster than light ? or would the aforementioned statement disprove that statement ???

  • @IvanderHaisley Well it could also be a miscalculation when determining the speed of neutrinos. We just have to wait untill its reproduced and peer reviewed before figuring out how it was able to achieve it . Also what mechnisms take place when an object reaches and passes the speed of light. We know alot but understand very little :) Espically with our cosmic speed barrier broken. Also look at pulsar stars , and how fast they pulse ! Fantastic speeds secondly m16 galaxy spewing matter S.O,L

  • @yourboycal NiCE ^_^ ... thank you for that .. you mean millisecond pulsars right ?

  • @yourboycal My guess, the speed of light may be a probability distribution and not a universal constant, in which case the neutrinos were moving faster than the average speed of light, but still slightly less than the local speed that the individual particles were bound by.

    If so, then some of the neutrinos should have been slower than expected by about the same degree as those that were faster. I haven't seen any mention of this, but it wouldn't make exciting headlines so I'm not surprised.

  • @HitfulVids well this would be the first example to show a probability distribution. I'm not sure if they some how manifest info virtual particles skipping little bit of the journey and turning up at the finish line somehow. But really gives you goosebumps when discoveries like this come upfront. The sub atmoic world is really some strange behavoir, i just want other labs to verify the results . They did a follow up experiment and concluded first obeservations but we need more data for stamp :p

  • I dont care if he is wrong. I just like the sound or words "warps and curves in the fabric of space and time !"

    Got to be smoking heavy shit to come up with that saying !

  • This is wrong on so many levels.

  • I hate how science in the past said that nothing can go faster than light, Science is nothing without God.

  • @RespectMyHate You have to remember science is a method not a position. Science is always changing with as new evidence comes in. Its a on going process. Science answers the how's not the why's .  Its a self correcting system based on imperical evidence at the time. I'm a fan of god and science :D No reason why they can't both mingle in a elaborate dance in the cosmos and then some!

  • @RespectMyHate Science is about observing the world and trying to figure out how it works. God is an intellectual paradigm to feel safe about where you're going after you die. Science is not about its postulates, its postulates are about science: if the observations do not coincide with the postulates, they are brought to revision. Thats science's strength, has god ever been put through revision by a faithful christian? food for thought!

  • @elnombrequeseamomo one time I was about to get jumped by some mexican, a young man came walking down the street and immediately broke up the group and told them to leave with authority he then ask me if I was OK, I said yes, I look to see the mexicans leaving then I looked back to thank the young man, he was Gone I should have been able to see him in any direction, he was wearing a bright red shirt, but it was like he literally vanished. I have seen God put to the test, and He passed.

  • @RespectMyHate oh god...

  • @RespectMyHate it is very cool and reassuring when things like that happen.

  • @69kuato Has anything like that happened to you? and By the way the story is true, that really happened. I get goose bumps when I tell people.

  • @RespectMyHate Yes it has a few times. Im pretty sure there is a higher force protecting me. I get creeped out almost talking about it. Especially not here!! Too many ignorant people lacking life experience who will just flame the post, so I just shut up about it and know that what I experienced was real. If I didnt experience it, I would not be here.

  • @69kuato please tell me about your experience, PM me if you have too, I would love to hear it.

  • @RespectMyHate

    "science is nothing without god"

    arrogant statement. I believe in god, but i believe in my inner morale god, nameless, boldless, unexplainable.

    As "god" should be boldless and explainable to every1. But to some people among yourself god is "THE ANSWER"

    Kinda silly when the tradition and thoughts along this faith create worldwide setups, wars, famines, problems and utter shit.

    While nerds like einstein waste their whole life to bring hot fat hotdogs with mustard to your plate.

  • @RespectMyHate

    faith drives people to persuit knowledge. Since you need any kind of faith either from within or from a 1000page book to actualy create the will to persuit knowledge. As you need something to believe in to go with.

    But because we humans know something as tradition, and like to generalize our lifes we try to asses faith as static, unchangeable, complete baked and installed truth. While the universe is changing around us faster then light.

    But we choose not to change our faith.

  • @RespectMyHate

    even although the universe changes around us, we wont change beyond the speed of sound not to mention "light"

    its a key reason for people like me (agnostic, atheist or w/e) to demonize religious people like yourself. Because you believe in something unchangeable as written unquestionable truth. WHile all life answers are foundated by questionable truths. Whereas these actual truths would be considered godlike to our ancestors.

    In that sense we are the gods. And your not the

  • @RespectMyHate

    contributing factor to remain static.

  • what if there is something faster than light but we still didn't discover it??? it is just doesn't make sense!

  • @NightSord well apparently neutrino's flew faster then light recently at cern. but the calculations still have to be verified . If its true , then we have a speed of light einstein problem . Which would mean rewrite a few things.

  • @NightSord Check out the CERN experiment yesterday. They just sent nutrinos FASTER THAN LIGHT. It turns out Einstein was wrong. Ha ha ha

  • @guydecervens GPS proved Einstein wrong years ago, And Newton was right to begin with. If our gravitational pull to where the Sun was 8 min. ago true. We would be shot off into space... but here we are.

  • @NightSord In the quantum world informations between atoms for example is at least 10 000 times faster then the speed of light scientists thinks its instant. But this does not break theory of relativity ;D.

  • @piloooogen why because they don't travel like light does?

  • @NightSord 1. "In the quantum world there is no time"

    2. Possible swifts in the dimensions

    I can´t say I really understand it myself but as I understand the messenger go through an higher dimension and therefore higher "speed limit"

  • @piloooogen but there is time even if it moves in the Higher "speed limit" it's just moving but time is ticking that dose not you can manipulate time. i honestly believe that there is some kind of different law but someone have to come up with it because if it was right then it would work not fail till now! i hope i am wrong!

  • The only thing I don't like about the graphic representation of space fabric is that they always represent space (in our solar system) as being a flat surface with a ball (the sun) sitting on it, making an indentation in the surface. But space is all around the sun, so I try to imagine it like a block of foam, and then the sun is in the centre. What would this do to the foam? I imagine it would make the foam bulge outward all around. How would this attract matter?

  • Interesting video! I am an artist on YouTube trying to promote my theory on the dynamics of light and time

    This theory is based on just two simple postulates

    1. The first is that the quantum wave particle function explained by Schrödinger’s wave equation represents the forward passage of time itself

    2. The second is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event

  • neat

  • SandustanBrasov

    The UNIFIED LAW is the LAW of the UNIVERSAL ATTRACTION FORCES= of the GRAVITATIONAL INTERACTION FORCES = of the ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD FORCES produced by the inner movement of the inertial rotation of the ethereal matter from bodies and substances. This, because, the ethereal particles are in continuous movement through the them nature, being electrical – produce electrical energy, being named and electrogenic particles.

  • @sandustanBrasov Thanks for taking the time to write all that . I look forward to reading it . Im curious though what form if any do you believe the "gravaton" will be detected in ? and whats your view on putting the higgs aside and bringing out this technicolor theory forth ?

  • @sandustanBrasov Time travel was accomplished Faster-Than-Light Nikola Tesla stole the world for JP Morgan like a thief in the night. YOU THINK THEY TOLD YOU (FTL)? They won a million lottos now you can go to hell. "All of my investigations seem to point to the conclusion that they are small particles, each carrying so small a charge that we are justified in calling them neutrons. They move with great velocity, exceeding that of light." Nikola Tesla, July 10, 1932

  • SandustanBrasov

    The unified law of Newton will throw at rubbish Einstein’s relativity, with Big bang, black holes, singularity and holes of worm. With these methaphysical theories and animation about absorption the Eartn or Sun it destroy logical thinking and reason at man. With this dissiness enter man in terrestrial life, and no more believe that he has a future. Result thus blocking of the society, which lead at general corruption of society and at her sodominess and dissoluteness.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The universal attraction law of the Newton is the UNIFIED LAW because all those three fundamental interactions: the nuclear interaction, the electromagnetic(electron-proto­¬n) interaction and the gravitational interaction are interactions produced through the ethereal matter, what bind the classical physics of the good part of the modern physics, but it bind and the ETHEREAL PHYSICS.

  • SandustanBrasov

    Any will be the couple of material bodies, the newtonian system contain the idea that a force of attraction unite them, that they are attracts one towards the other of this proportional force with the multiplied the masses, and reverse proportional with the square of the distance which separate them.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    All those three principles of the dynamics: the inertia's principle, the principle the proportionality of the acceleration with the force and the principle of the action and reaction - are essential elements of the universal attraction law; which in essence is a law of the inertial mass in motion.

  • SandustanBrasov

    In an atom, the peripherical big speed at so little radius are proof that every particle or group of particles can create continuously a personal magnetic field in which floats and which permit them an inertial rotation movement without rapid lesses, as a celestial body in cosmical space.For example, the medium's density at 200 miles above Earth is so small, that if Jupiter it will turn in this medium 1000000 years, then Jupiter will lose not to millionth part from his motion!

  • • SandustanBrasov

    Thus two bodies in interaction creates between them a magnetic depresion what constitute the attraction force between bodies. In a similar mode it can construct the magnetic fields schedule for a helium atom in which we have: 1).-the magnetic field created by the nucleus; 2).-the electromagnetic field created between an electron and a proton; 3).-the gravitational electromagnetic field of the atom, field what is absorbed of atom and is accelerated by the electromagnetic

  • • SandustanBrasov

    Thus the viscous material from the central zone can get only through a certain extremity, evolving around the particle or further away in space from where it turns by the other extremity of the particle. The inertial movement working of the underatomic particles and the atoms as whole permits them to compare with the powerful ASPIRATORS which absorbs, but its emits too matter under the form of magnetic field's particles.

  • SandustanBrasov

    Loops which at the substraction of rotation speed are retiring, and at growth rotation speed, evolves around the particle and enter through the other end forming a continuously mass circulation of primary matter from the central zone. The external's part of the particle by friction with the medium become a spherical surface, and in the inner share where continuous the crystallisation it will obtain an uniformly waved surface, with helicoidal channels disposed around his axis.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The general schedule of existence of any underatomic particle is a schedule to one sphere with central section on the rotation vertical axis of the particle in which we have: 1).-the carcass resulting by the radially crystallisation, from external to internal; 2).-the viscous inner mass; 3).-inner helicoid channel disposed around the axis, resulted in the last carcass crystallisation; 4).-magnetic field loops or primary viscous mass loops from the central zone.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    How the solidification begins from external it would resultated that in the central zone at any underatomic particles would remained continuously a primary matter mass, more viscous, so that to the shown rotations the free underatomic particles, or in the atom's frame, to take out in space matter from the central zone, but on which to it recover continuously for maintaining the them integrity.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The atoms, the underatomic particles, the radiations - all to be possible to crystallize at highter temperature. Continuing so we arrive to the gravitational field particles whose characteristics: rapid movement, great power of penetration and reciprocal attraction proves that they also can be composed.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The existence of the rotation motion in macrocosmos and in microcosmos, and the great temperature interval from zero Kelvin degrees at millions of degrees in stars, guide us attention towards the inertial masses in motion and towards the matter's crystallisation phenomenons. Naturally, the crystallisation bigins from external(from periphery) and advances towards the central zone. The bodies and substances known by man, are crystallizing between 0...4000 Kelvin degrees.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    Mendeleev had shown that we can not conceive without motion even the smallest matter particle. It says about radiations but about atoms and molecules that they have a vibration frequency of approximate 10 at 13 …10 at 15 what means that these are turning arround theirs self axes with 10 at 13 …10 at 15 rotations on second proofing the existence of a continuous inertial motion .

  • SandustanBrasov

    Our brethren from ITER have capacity of to construct controlled thermonuclear reactor, only that they must let abandon tokamak installation.Because that the tokamak installation were invented in 1950 by phisicists Igor Tamm and Andrei Sakharov, inspired by idea of Oleg Lavrentyev, when he studiing the realization of the hydrogen bomb which it has not need of magnetic trap, and thus all experiments were finished with destructuion of the tokamak installations in the central zone.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    As following of the thermonuclear reaction from Sun, the Sun is a giant powerstation of electromagnetic energy, a powerfull source of electricity which keep up the life of every where from his planetary system.This electrical ether which come from Sun, we gather him with our electrical generators and drive our industry. This electrical ether is absorbed and of the our bodies and of any creature, - electrical ether which keep and animate the our existence.

  • SandustanBrasov

    The electrical ether- for example- proceed from magnetic field from atoms, eliminated in following combination of the deuterium with tritium in helium.The eliminated magnetic field it decompose in particles of electrical ether in chamber of thermonuclear reaction.Any chemical combination eliminate this electrical ether.But at the chemical combination the chemical elements which participate at reaction can not to be magnetic isolated because they it combine before to be ionized.

  • SandustanBrasov

    Any body is accompanied of a personal ether.When it combine two substances, it combine and those two personal ethers, giving birth at another substances with another personal ether, which give body a certain colour and certain properties. Whole what is solid on Earth is impregnated with his personal ether with the more greatest density from the thousands of sorts of ethers.The liquids have them personal ether some rare and gases have them personal ether more rare and diaphanos.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    But the seen matter: gaseous, liquid and solid remain not single in her existence, but is dressed, interpenetrated and driven by ethereal matter. Neither an atom of the whose chemical element can exist not, without existence in each atom to one personal part of ethereal matter, which hold him concentrated, which active him and on which hold him in material exchenge with the environing medium, with the others bodies.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    I have made only a logical, rational and intuitive synthesis, having at base in majority, experimental, observed and demonstrated arguments. I have not something against the CERN, ITER or NASA, but against the utopian conceptions from theoretical physics with which are indoctrinated thenths of thousands of engineers and physicists involved in ethereal describes of the matter, in realization of the thermonuclear controlled fusion and in mode of transportation the man in cosmos.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The matter of the our terrestrial globe has four states of aggregation: solid, liquid, gseous and ethereal and not three after official science. The matter on which we see it, proceed from the ethereal matter, which from cancentration in concentration it had constituted in the electrons, in protons respectivel;y in the atoms of the chemical elements which had overtaken at the gaseous, liquid and solid state. All the matter on which we see it, is condensed ether.

  • SandustanBrasov

    The GRAVITY’s PARTICLES as aproximately the smallest ethereal particles, constitute the most general ethereal aggregation state from nature, with the largest temperature interval, from zero Kelvin degrees to millions of degrees in stars. That is an aggregation state which coexist with all others aggregation states(solid, liquid, gaseous, ethereal) and on which it influenced them. The actual official science is mistaken in great proportion because this has not in sight the Ether.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The ACTUAL ELECTRICAL GENERATORS : galvanic elements and electrical accumulators; dynamos and alternators; thermoelements and photoelectric cell - transform nothing, but they only gather the electrical energy= the particles of the electrical ether which exist in metals, in the environing medium, in the thermic radiation or in the ray of light!

  • SandustanBrasov

    The ELECTRICAL CURRENT consist in circulation in the round and in lengthways to one electrical conductor to the particles of electrical ether guided on the magnetic field from the round the conductor; magnetic field formed all from particles of electrical ether coupled head at head and expelled in concentric circles in the round the conductor.If it interrupt the electrical current, then it decompose and this magnetic field in particles of electrical ether and it drain in circuit

  • SandustanBrasov

    The ELECTRICAL FIELD is a field of particles of electrical ether, free and it move approximate in right line.The MAGNETIC FIELD from the round of one conductor is constituted forever from particles of the electrical ether, but magnetic coupled head at head and it move on a curve forming concentric circles in round to one conductor.The ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD is a combination of particles of electrical field anf of curls of magnetic field, having property of the evolve in space.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The ELECTRON is not an exclusive electrical load, but an elementary particle from the composition of any atom, and is only a particle with intermediate role in the unfolding of the electrical phenomenons. The REAL ELECTRCAL LOAD is a particle of electrical ether more nore small than the electron, has and she a personal and rapid rotation, producing a personal magnetic field, which it gear with the magnetic field from the round of one electrical conductor.

  • SandustanBrasov

    The PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL MATTER is the visible matter with free eye and is constituted from atoms of the chemical elements. The PHYSICAL-ETHEREAL MATTER is a matter with atoms more small with 7..8 order of dimension than the atoms of chemical elements, and the bodies formed from this matter are invisible for the human eye. The ETHEREAL PHYSICS it occupy with the study of the ethereal matters, but which was abandoned in the XX century, because in 1905 A.Einstein excludes the ether.

  • • SandustanBrasov But the ETHER is a physical reality constituted from a very small matter, invisible for human eye, and is formed from atoms more small with 7...8 order of dimension than the atoms of the chemical elements. The matter of the ether penetrate in all the visible bodies and is the physical matter which fills both the interplanetary space and the interatomic space. The ether is a matter with mass and weigth, being subdued and she the action of the universal attraction law.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    After Mendeleev's opinion is possible and necessary the extension of periodical system for other size's order - more small- of the ethereal matter particles. About the absolute vacuum space, M.Faraday had the certitude that it doesn't exist, and it exists only an incomplte vacuum whose spatial magnetic state is of the most importance for the natures phenomenons.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    D.I.Mendeleev had shown through 1860:"Studying the ether which penetrate in all the bodies and asking myself the question: from what is formed this ether's mass, I had admitted the idea that theirs atoms, or his matter represent the primary matter, from which are formed all atoms. The existence to the one light mass, to the one light substance and less of chemical forces, is possibly but, is even necessary".

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The Dutch astronomer Jan Oort from Leyde university, determines in 1965 the density of the matter in the Sun's neighbourhood, of 0.10 solar mass on the cubic parsec. The his conclusion was that in our galaxy exist not an invizible zone(without matter). The Milky Way and our neighbour Andromeda it approach one of another, with a speed of 93 km/s, and not it remove how it believe that make other galaxies.

  • SandustanBrasov If in 1905 Einstein excludes the ether from physics, viz excludes the intergalactic matter, then the his fanatical disciples, the his theoretical parrots, arrive with the rlativity theory at Big bang, at black holes, holes of worm, at singularity and today at the travel in time. Thus, the great explosion of George Gamov and his follows R.A.Ipfer and R.C.Hermann become cosmological standardized theory, but which is one great bluff!

  • SandustanBrasov

    In 1930..1935 apple of discord was the photon of light. General opinion of the physicists had adopted the viewpoint which unholded not the existence's idea in flight to photon. Thus they had allowed the photon without mass.If the photon has not mass, he can't interact with nothing on trajectory and the light speed remain constant.In place let to consider that the photons lose the speed on way following them interaction with the meeted matter, they had set the Universe let dilate

  • SandustanBrasov

    In accordance with Hubble's law for two heavenly bodies founded at the same distance from Earth, the constant must needs let has the same value.The three astronomers for respective measurement, they had fixed about 120 spirally galaxies founded in average at the same distance, but in different regions of the supergalaxy. The result was surprising: resulted that the speed of moving off of the galaxies in first region was of 4796 km/s face of 481 km/s for those from second region.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The subsequent investigations, effected in continuous with test all more profound in the dept of the Universe, proved that the value of the Hubble's constant, which bind the speed of moving off with the distance, it cipher in the round a 100 km/s on megaparsec. But in the year 1973, three astronomers: V.C.Rubin, J.S.Rubin and W.K.Ford from observatory Lick from California succeeded let shake in serious mode the infallibility of the Hubble's constant.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    In 1929, Hubble and Humason had established that the bright rays which come from a galaxy at a terrestrial observer it manifest in the spectral image to the this galaxy through the displacement of the length of wave, towards the red domain of the spectrum, and the disparity is with so much more great how the transmitting source is more remote.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    Face of the initial surprise, at the finding to one Universe in expansion, even Hubble to inclined let explain the displacement towards red, as a tiredness of the light on the immense way which separate her of galaxy which emited her; can be a loss of energy because the nature of the light and the interaction with the matter meeted in way, which give a displacement towards red more great and the Hubble's constant will grow.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    Today in front of our eyes and of the observation apparatuss it succedes all evolution phases of the celestial bodies, stars and galaxies. An evidence that the Universe doesn't seems to have an explosive beginning, and doesn't seems to have ever an end in the his entirely. The facts demonstrates that in Universe the cyclical creation has place continuously in certains parts and can has not place total creation in the same time in all the mass of the Universe.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The discovery from 1972 about quasar 3C279, this concrete evidence, guides in physics at the breakdown myth as 300000 km/s as maximum speed; guides in astronomy to the Hubble;s law revision, the law expressed by an empirical relation bound by 13 miliards of years how it considers at taht time the Universe age; and the famous Big bang, the great explosion of George Gamov let be not anything than a great bluff!

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The fact seeming strange, after 12 days it take back with care the observations, and it confirm the first results. Moreover, extrapolating the dates towards past the astronomers had arrived at the conclusion that the two parts of the quasar had started let it separate towards the end of the year 1967, date at which the quasar passed through one activity of radioemission very intense. Was the moment when the quasar 3C279 it was broken at least in two parts.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    • The both radiotelescopes was oriented towards the 3C279 quasar at which was observed the two double punctual emission very near. After four months it resume the measurements about quasar. Leaving from the period's enlargement to the fringes interference, it deduce and the angular distance between the two source. How the time in which the source had removed was known, it was calculated the speed of moving off and which was of TEN TIMES more great than the light speed!

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The quasars are quasistellary bodies which emits intense radiowave and radiation in ultravilet and infrared.The surprise to come from quasar 3C279 from two parts of its resulted in following explosion from 1967 and which it had continuated to displace in space with a speed of ten times more great than the light speed. In 1972 an american astronomers team guided of I.Shapiro had coupled two radiotelescopes: one from Haystack-Massachussets with one from Goldstone-California.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    Today, on measure that the theory advances from classic mechanics to the quantum mechanics the particle and wave are gradual dematerialize.The modern physics is blocked by enounciation of some laws and mistaken principles as: relativity theory;Hubble's low, poastulation that the atom can't emit and absorb radiations continuously, admitting the postulate what claims the photons without mass a.s.o.These guide us at supernatural, and at the technical and technological blockage.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    Nikola Tesla argued that:"I hold that the space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can has not properties. Of properties it can speak only when it work with the matter which fill up the space. The empty space it can not curve because - something - can not action about - nothing". This relativity proceed from a philosophical direction, on which A.Einstein produce her when he was found in a state of technical and religious confusion.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The scientist man Nikola Tesla showed that the relativity theory was the creation of the great philosopher Ruder Boscovich and was emited with over 200 years ago, dealt with relativity, including to so-called time-space continuum, and from this taken and A.Einstein a great part and alter it.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    Einstein considers the gravity as a property of the space and not in the least as a property of the matter which fill up this space. The relativity theory of the Einstein is a geometrization of the space. Leibnitz(1646...1716) German scientist, forerunner of the mathematical logic, through the denial the newtonian space-time is and he a forerunner of the Einstein's relativity.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    Were introduced in physics the infinite mass phantoms, the infinite energy phantoms and the infinite impulse phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed in vacuum. Today we know that many particles were accelerate unill at the light speed, others had arrived with this speed from cosmos, but at none grow up not at infinite or near of infinite the mass, the energy or the impulse.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    It renounce thus at the absolute space and at the absolute time. From the simple and linear transformations of the Galilei's relativity it arrive at the Lorentz- Einstein's transformations through the introduction to two factors, subunitary and superunitary. Thus, with these confusions about space and time it passed at the adequate changes about the whole physics.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    Actually Einstein, from theoretical confusion and of megalomania, establish that none object with mass can not outrun the light speed.He succeeding, how written publications of the time, let vex much people, then, whenever over a hundred of people of science had signed a petition in which they upholded that the relativity theory is mistaken, is fallacious.Einstein upholded his relativity theory, believing in the fact that then, nobody can not to demonstrate him the contrary.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    But in 1905, A.Einstein conclude that the ether hasn't a correspondent in reality and constitute not a medium which let can serve as reference system. Thus Einstein renounced to the ether notion and absolute space and emits the two restricted relativity principles. By it content the second principle excludes the ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement - the light speed - and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality.

    

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The physicists Hendrik A.Lorentz admits existence of the ether, but emit the hypothesis that any body which it move in report with the ether, with a speed V, suffers a contarction, in the sense that the parallel dimension with the motion's direction it decrease, creating a subunitary factor and arranging formulas in this sense,H.A.Lorentz showed that once with the process of contraction it admits and a dilatation of the time, he alters in this sense the relation to Galilei.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The Michelson-Morley experiments(1881) with the purpose to put in evidence the Earth movement face of one immobile ether, for too be taken as a reference system, had forever the same result. Thus the experiments had showed: 1).-that the ether is complete training with the mass and the Earth's atmosphere; 2).- and that our conception about ether as reference system is not right.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    Through the relativity theory to Einstein of over century, it hold with strenght -as a conspiracy a general activity of intellectual stultify of the planetary population. from relativity theory proceed the notion of: singularity, Big bang, black holes and holes of worm. From 1905 and till now in 2011, the disciples of the Einstein, preach with contumely as scientific elements of high class these theoretical confusions, these absurdities from which they had made a business.

  • SandustanBrasov

    It popularize the fantastical theories and stantardized theories with which it terrorize the inhabitants the Earth, after what Einstein with relativity theory had blocked the science of the century XX. Sptephen Hawking and roger Penrose had demonstrated in 1967 that the black holes proceed from the relativity theory. How it can conceive and it can say that the heart of the one black hole is a gravitational singularity whose volume tend to zero and whose mass tend to infinite?

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The notion of dark matter and dark energy proceed from theoretical physics, from relativity theory of the A. Einstein, from the mistaken interpretation of the physical reality. Something exist indeed: and matter and energy; but is the much ethereal matter and the her energys from the her frame. Dark energy and cosmic acceleration are a failure of relativity of the Einstein.

  • I think its amazing that everyone who is insulting the fathers of modern physics and science, cant even spell. Everyone knows Einstein worked in a patent office, but I doubt any of you who are calling him a fraud even know how he came up with the theory of relativity, or the fact that Newton created calculus in a matter of months. So it doesnt matter if their theories were off or even wrong, I mean what the fuck have you even done beside not learn how to spell?

  • Isaac Newton doesn't embarassed about anything... he is Isaac Newton.

  • somebody sent an idea to a patent ofice to get it copywritten and one of the copywritters at the patenet office stole the idea and got a nobel prize for it , this idea theif was called Albert

  • @asun7 Yeah crazy old albert was a thief, communist, war monger, zionist, liar, shill, manikin and a fraud wheeled out in front of humanity to dumb us down into a slave psyence which benefits a small group of control freaks known as the: central bankers, war mongers and energy barons. They love your slavery: believing in idiots like einstein, hawking, sagan, michio kookoo and a host of other sell out schmucks

    See my einstein's idiots playlist anyone who has a problem with the truth, it's proof

  • xkcd 895 should explain it, lol.

  • If nothing can travel faster than the speed of light what is traveling at the speed of light times itself? C squared? These are velocities of light, so can anyone tell me what is traveling 186,000 times faster than the seppd of light?

    Light does not travel it reproduces itself wave field to wave field!

    Gravity has no velocity, it is absolute stillness. Time is not a dimension!

    einstein solved nothing. he came up with a myth which was pushed on humanity by his tribe the kahazars!

  • @77GSlinger You're retarded. You have no knowledge of differential geometry, tensor analysis, wave optics, nor GR as a whole and your laymen brain claims to have bested the greatest scientific mind of all time. Pathetic.

  • @floopsie666 You are a slave and proud of your slavery. einstein is "greatest Psyentific mind of all time". LMFAO! Look who is really retarded! What a scrub of a mind controlled lemming you are and you don't know anything about me at all sad sack! You are a Failure and must be a khazar also if you worship einstein the khazarian stooge and idiot who has enslaved humanity to a false phsyics which is owned by the energy barons, war mongers and central bankers of his tribe.

  • @floopsie666 Oh and by the way, it is always worthless when you attack someone like a coward from a fake youtube account floopsie666 antichrist scum. You are the living defintion of "PATHETIC" you poor mindless slob and spinless chicken shit coward!

  • @77GSlinger Until you have any grasp of linearized gravity and how the wave equation for gravitational waves naturally predict bosonic spin 2 particles traveling at light speed just shut up.

  • @floopsie666 You are so full of shit with your fake ass "linearized gravity", LMFAO! "bosonic spin 2 particles" fucking ridiculous! "traveling at the speed of light", you are mentally ill and an psyentific slave of the new world order mind control dumbing down agenda. It worked real good with you. You bought all the lies hook, line and sinker. You have not one ounce of critical thinking. And, you call me retarded? You have shit from brains fool!

    Make me shut up you weak little coward!

  • @ChateauSiran1986 and what about this? if you have a rope 150million km long.. for light to cross that distance it needs 8.5 mins.. but if you moved the rope, its other end also will move only after 8.5 mins???

    assume that the rope has no elasticity (as if it is a single particle) and stretched already

  • How about things that cross the event horizon? Don't they travel faster than light?

  • @wa9r No.

  • @wa9r nope.. actually, they hardly moving at all, because it is space that falls into the black hole, so if space moves, but objects don't move (stay in the same place in space) so the displace without moving..

    same way you can get into far galaxies faster than light without any moving, but making the space move (best will be after proving of gravitational waves.. i need to do research if it is proven or not yet)

  • A gravitational force field is an inherent component of extreme heat that's made up of two subfields. One is excursive and the other incursive. I've named the excursive field the X-gravity field factor. The X factor repels other worlds at a rate of .0735 pounds per sq. in. per linear mile, and gravity lends itself to matter creating the illusion that it has a gravitational center and weight. It accrues weight pressure at the same rate as the X field component but work in opposite directions.

  • If gravity is a force why isn't it omnipresent? If there is no mass there is no gravity? How massive would an object have to be before gravity kicks in?

  • @yyGODyy Well apparently it is omi present . Which is what keeps all the celestial bodies afloat and swiming in there own orbit . Even you have gravity and all objects . But your mass is to small for you to notice or have effect on other objects . You need big masses like the sun earth moon in order to "feel" the byproduct of w/e forces we know as gravity

  • @yourboycal Hmm, ok. Say floating around in space there was a galaxy sized planet of nothing but water. Assuming this was enough mass to have gravity kick in, if we placed an object that is not buoyant in the planet's water, at what point would it stop sinking? Would it stop at the centre? Would it go through the planet completely? That is fucking weird when you think of it. Anyone?

  • @yyGODyy "The buoyant force is equal to the weight of the displaced water. As you sinkdeeper, the weight of the deep water gets smaller and the weight of theobject likewise gets smaller in the same proportion. Hence, if it sinks atone level, it will sink at all. But you cannot ignore friction, so it willpass through the center, go some distance back up on the other side, comeback, etc until it would eventually stop in the center" -askthephysicist reply

  • @yourboycal I should have said 'ignoring friction and buoyant force... etc.'I wanted to focus on how gravity works. but the object arriving at the centre was the same conclusion I came to. I took a non-physics-major phys. class and the proff treated Albert like a stepchild.

  • @yourboycal But also density is pressure dependent - for all objects but not proportionally. So your assertion of "sinks at one level, sinks at all" may not be true. This hypothetical scenario is too abstruse to be of any value in a discussion about gravity.

  • @yyGODyy other nice thing... if you dig a hole in earth, a tunnel that joins 2 parts of the earth passing through its center, then if you will jump into it (assume no friction) then you will keep accelerating up..after you pass the center, you will start slowing down, and finally you will you will reach the other side of the planet after 42 mins... but the better thing, if you make from example a tunnel between New York and Hong Kong.. and jump into it, it will take 42 mins too to cross. :P

  • @yyGODyy all mass has gravity... but most of the time it's not enough to be noticeable

  • @Xero555000 ah, that's what I've learned.

  • Tesla said: half of Relativity theory is wrong...

    Nice video: more tech in "Wonderful electric energy" by HorizonDelta ;-)

  • Einstein was wrong fabric of Space and Time Doesn't Exist.....

  • I don't know if this is right, but it makes much mores sense that gravity is an effect, not an actual force. The force at work is none other than that of electromagnetism at great distances. Gravity is simply a new word to describe macro-cosmic scale interactions of large aggregates of matter via electromagnetism, or electricity in general that is moving throughout the universe.

  • @circusOFprecision with electromagnetism i would like to see large heavy rocks used using some sort of electromagnetism machine. Just like in coral castle. and those multi ton blocks. If its as easy as electomagnetism then surley a machine to minipulate "gravity" should be able shown today ? But i've yet to see such demonstrations to give electromagetism as the sole cause of what we feel as "gravity" yea i know everything has a electromagnetic field but gravity pesky one

  • @yourboycal

    I guess it's not as simple as that. But magnetism is certainly a huge factor in the way the solar system operates, at least some people think so. But maybe there is another face to electromagnetism, another aspect of the geometry it produces. I know the math expects some sort of carrier particle, is that true?

  • @yourboycal

    I just realized that you aren't taking a few things into consideration. First, when we talk about the effects of electromagnetism at large distances, we are talking huge energies. Second, it isn't simply magnetic attraction or repulsion, but there are electric currents and charges flowing throughout the universe. Also, electromagnetism doesn't simply override the principle of mass. Maybe we could do an experiment, we just have to get real clever in this pesky devil.

  • @circusOFprecision einstein was wrong about Gravity Fabric of Space and Time doesn't Exist.. Check my Video.. then post your Comment... you will be the Judge

  • Newton sits atop Olympus, Einstein cannot even see past the clouds gathered around its summit.

  • take a look at the spacetime models, which is the best explanation so far about what is gravity.

    Spacetime Model by Jacky JEROME

  • Wasn't the concept of "space-time" created along with Einstein's 1905 Special Relativity paper? He needed it to explain how physics worked in different inertial reference frames, I don't think he discovered the idea of space-time while working on general relativity, he just found a way to use the idea in a more general manner.

  • He wasn't wrong, he just didn't write the equation the way it was supposed to be written, but it was hell of alot shorter than the actual way..

  • damn, Einstein was a fucking boss.

  • Gravitational wave theory was first explained by prophet Mohamed some 1400 years ago.Muslims have evidence for this.Later this informations spread to Greek and today known as though the westerners discovered it!!~

  • einstein's theory of the black hole he says 1/r is the radius, if r=radius then the radius of the black hole is very close to 0 like 0.0000000000000000000000000000­0000000000000000001 alot of zeros with a one in front of it if you divide that 1/ like 0 it would be infinite (type in you scientific calculator 1/0 it will appear error 2.) so einstein basicly said the radius of a black hole is ifinite it cant be because anything with a diameter it has to have a radius, r=d/2 so therefore he was wron

  • Weight is actualy defined by the structures specific gravity but the specific gravity can be changed like us magnetising aluminum

    Check radiant energy overunity

  • Faith is believing that what you don't see evidence for exist its a faith based mathmatics any two creates a invisible

    3 so any number can be any other number

  • Now if i had 12 that would be 93,84,75

    All12 and 12 splits the 6so 666

    If i had a 34 that would be 7,52,61,79=16=7

    16 splits my 8, 888 now i can do anyway

  • If you had two apples you have 1 and two

    Now a 1.5 apple i could see but i dont see a 1.5 apple I see a force of 3 invisible 3 is splitby. 42 51 69=15 78=15=6 splits 3three3

  • You might find this interesting i did the matrix

    Of the invisible force the force between the sun and earth if the sun and earth were invisible you have a force a dual matrix

  • Gravity = magnetism frequency temperature

    Magnetism = electrons ,protons =neclues

    My ion jet can travel to space with no fuel

    It makes ozone plasma

  • what i mean is that light is increasing in size wich is one of the reasons it appears to be moving slowly, its the observer taking more time to travel across the light ray not the light taking more time to get to the observer as the light ray travels faster it grows in size..

  • end of rant lol not to write a book.

  • weight=downward acceleration towards a larger object.your feeling the object constantly excert force and constantly move towards the earth when you feel something "heavy".