today IS the time to experiment with socialist. equal rights and opportunity for all regardless of sex, race, ethnicity, socio-economic status, religion, sexual orientation. Socialism is for the benefit of society and the majority of citizens
Marriage "redefined?" Not at all. Lakota chief Crazy Horse had one or two male spouse(s) and many other Native American nations also have had what we now call same-sex marriages. Ethnographers have documented this. Some examples: Omahas, Zapotecs, Mohaves, Crow, Hidatsa, Ojibwa, Winnebago, Yuma and Timucua. Other cultures too. In 17th century Fukian Province China, same-sex marriages between gay men seem to have been common. And in West Africa, "woman marriage[s]" --a practice by many tribes.
She always keeps mentioning her freaking holy , moral belief about the traditional definition of marriage when her family is not even moral. She eloped with her freaking stupid boyfriend without her parent's permission, letting her daughter have sex and live with her boyfriend as unmarried couples. Well, she has no problem with that because her daughter is heterosexual. What a hypocritical homophobe. If she has some nerve to run as a presidential candidate, she'll be the shame for all American.
I myself am against Prop 8 and anything saying gay marriage is wrong...sarah palin liking P8 just renforces that opinion...
OH and for those people who say gay marriage is wrong and should be banned...
I'd like to see you go look a happy, loving couple of homosexuals and lesibens who love eachother just the same as a Man and Woman couple and say,"no, you're scum...you can't get married"
so you voted for marriage between a man and a woman of the same color? why would you vote for that? oh, and voteing that african american slave's cant be married either? So you voted for that, good job.
"ok, you said you voted for the "Traditional" form of marriage, and I was pointing out exactly what traditional marriage was up to the 1960's"
--You personal definition is erroneous, foolish, and moot. When everyone else uses the phrase "traditional marriage" they're referring to a union between a man & a woman.
it not how I use the fraise, but it was how traditional marriage was until 1966 during the cival right's movement. You see, from the 1500's all the way to the 1960's, white's were not allowed to marry people of a different color or race, they had to stick with white people, and if you were a slave, than you were considered property and thus was not allowed to be married at all. So in saying your all for traditional marriage in america, that is what it mean's to be traditional. Now, if you were
"and the reality is that homosexuals have the right to be married as well as straight's."
Of course they do. I've been saying this the whole time. Every fag has as much right to marry a woman as I do. And every nasty dyke has every right to marry a man as any other woman does.
See? We all have EQUAL rights. Isn't this country great?
actually, bye taking saying that only a man and a woman has the right to wed each other, and that you can't marry the same sex is like the beginning of the holocaust. Bye smearing them for your own personal gain, it's what hittler did to the jew's at first, bye calling them filth, smearing them because they were different.
Where is the smear in saying we all have equal rights to marry a member of the opposite sex? And where is my personal gain?
"bye calling them filth, smearing them because they were different"
But they weren't different, other than their religion.
Wow, you really are stupid, aren't you? You even tried to use Hitler to make your point, and even failed at that because you can't even understand your own arguments. Wow!
have you studied the holocaust, he did this to not only jews, but also to homosexual's, to blacks, to christeans. so look more into it before saying something, because I was pointing out that he is doing the same thing you are doing, except the only difference was the fact that it was a race of people, and you are doing this to someone of a sexual orientation.
Probably more than you. What Blacks did he do that to? Not too many Blacks in Germany, Austria, Poland, Russia, or Czechoslovakia back then.
"it was a race of people, and you are doing this to someone of a sexual orientation"
Again, your personal sexual preference of boinking dudes in the butt doesn't make you your own civil rights group. It simply doesn't apply in that circumstance. I know you really, really want it to, but it doesn't.
when did I say I was gay? Ive never had sex with, or have ever found a man sexually attractive in any way. And ok, I might have gotten some of my fact's on the holocaust incorrect.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"when did I say I was gay?"
It's in everything you write. You may not realize you're gay, but you're a fag thru & thru. Why bother attacking me so vehemently about this if it has nothing to do with you personally?
talking about the redone term of marriage, than you would be correct, but you said traditional, so I was just explaining what it was, and if you want, I can even go further back and explain to you that up until christeanity was created, marriage was a buisness proposition between a man and the father of a woman. To where the father would sell his daughter for land, food, money, live stock, and other form's of valuable objects. And the man wasn't tied down to only having one wife, he was allowed
as a matter of fact, yes, I did attend school like you said, and no, im not incorrect, or ignorant, but I do like the fact that you are showing some form of intelligence and would like to continue this debate. Bravo for using words that I learned when I was six.
excuse me? everything i've said has been politically correct and historically acurate. the fact that you don't research these thing's is showing the true idiot here.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"everything i've said has been politically correct and historically acurate"
AAA-HAAAHAHAHAhahahahaaahahaaa!!! Oh man that's good! That's just great! Oh, please stop, my side! Oh, man. Yes, quite yes, you're being politically correct. But being PC has NOTHING to do with being correct or right or anything else other than being a minion for someone else's agenda.
And I never said you were wrong about your grand historic accounts of what marriage "used to be," did I? Not that I agree.
but you keep going on about taking someone's right's away (even tho you keep blinding yourself bye saying their right's are still there, as long as it's with the opposite sex) And from what you keep saying, you are on Christeanity's agenda, I am protecting a group that really need's it, while you keep trying to take it away.
yes, because they go through constant ridicule from over half of the us, including half of congress and the government. So yes, they do need it, and after prop 8, it show's that there are still many people against homosexual's.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"after prop 8, it show's that there are still many people against homosexual's"
That's not what the text of the bill was, either. It was against homosexual marriage. Civil unions are still allowed, and most people are in favor of those.
You may not know jack shit about anything, but you're a good liar.
as many as he could afford. What's even more intresting is that Jesus didn't change that in anyway, for he wasn't here to deal with marriage, but to teach the word of God. For you see, it wasn't until about 150 ad (when christeanity was created) that Marriage was even considered a sacralidge in the first place. So under technicality, traditional marriage is pretty much a useless statement.
catch up to today? you mean like how you are showing hatred twords others who are different from you? oh ya, im really living in the past, trying to treat others with respect and dignity.
calling people derogatory terms, like fag and dyke, instead of the correct term, bye trying to take away their right's because of their sexual orientation, bye calling me an imbacial because I misspell some words.
so, your saying that homosexual, which are the correct term in the dictionary is an incorrect term? and yes, bye taking away their right to marry, your taking away their right's, and you just can't get that into YOUR thick, idiotic skull. Bye stating all these thing's you just did, it show's that you probably have a low intelligence and yet trying to prove other wise, ya, I might not be able to spell, but oh well, at least you know what I was saying, which I guess I should hand that to you.
and fag/dyke are? And yes, bye taking away their right to marry the people they are in love with, and are attracted to is taking away their rights. And what do you mean bye "Understand my own hitler term" when did I show confusion in that? Because I re read my own message, and I didn't show any confusion, I was actually pretty clear on what I said.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"and fag/dyke are?"
I never said they were. I said I like them better.
"taking away their right to marry the people they are in love with, and are attracted to is taking away their rights"
What if they loved a dog? Or a horse? Or 5 other people? Or their parents? Those are equally legitimate sexual preferences. Where are their rights? Why are you against their rights to marry? You Nazi!!
"when did I show confusion"
You showed confusion in what you wrote, you didn't understand it.
calling me a nazi, now who's incorrect on thing's? because the nazi's were the type who were against homosexual's, jew's, christeans, people of a different color, different race, anything that was different from them... and from your past statement's, you are showing those trait's, not me. And no, I didn't show confusion in those acpect's, but as it seems, you did.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"from your past statement's, you are showing those trait's, not me"
No, no, I'm talking about equality for everyone, and you're talking about taking away the rights of people who want to marry their parents, or another family, or their pets. You're the Nazi.
wow, are you searious? screw it, this has went from a debate to a retard trying to pretty much stay ignorant. Read all the post's, because not once have I ever pointed out about people marrying their mom or anything like that.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"not once have I ever pointed out about people marrying their mom or anything like that."
That's just because you're against them. You're a mommaphobe. You just want to enact hate legislation against them, taking away their freedoms. Why are you so hateful and socially regressive? Maybe you belong in the Dark Ages. Keep your Dark Ages legislation off my body!
Agreed. Funny thing is 50 years from now people will look back and be like "Wow, there was a time when they didn't let gays to get married?". No one is "crying like a waterworks" because this isn't over.
i know right...like how back then a black man and a white woman weren't allowed to get married...its the same shit...rights are being violated...people whose marriage are so fucked up they have to critisize others marriage..your right this isn't over
No matter what, everyone in this world is a damn socialist!!! quit saying ur not!! there is a left and right socialist agenda!!! We love Israel and we Love Britain!!! We SOCIALIZE with them!! USA is a right wing socialist platform!! Just like Nazi Germany was!!! Hopefully with Obama, it will change!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
We, the majority, know what's best for you. You will now accept Prop. 8 as law. No need to thank us, we're just glad we could help by voting in the constitutional amendment.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Sorry dipshit, the Supreme Court can only decide if it is constitutional or not. As Prop. 8 amended the constitution, it is constitutional by definition. Try again, loser.
Look at history. An amendment was added that banned interracial marriage, and yet, the supreme court repealed that. History will just repeat itself in the name of equality.
Wow. You're very intellectual-using words like "dipshit" and such. I guess we're done talking. Try not to cry when Prop 8 is repealed and gay marriage lives again!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
And how intellectual are you crying like a waterworks? Grow a backbone you sniveling wuss. The majority voted and they don't want gay marriage. Deal with it.
oh if she only had a brain...has anyone ever noticed she looks like shes on drugs 24/7 ... and belongs to an occult ... i think there should be a proposition 9 on ever hearing Sarah Palin speak again... all in favor ...
they are not taking any rights away stop with this victime kindalike campain u want to control peoples minds
is no on same sex marriage , is just the natural way, have ur own mind stop hearing this propaganda nonsence, what's right is right always, it never chages no matter what time it is,
I was going to remove this nonsensical comment, but I think it speaks volumes as to the "sophistication" and intelligence of the Yes on 8 cretins (look it up, darlin' ... a dictionary might be a good investment, lol).
You know when people like you leave comments like these you really should check spell check first... I don't respect people who mis-spell sooo many words in only one sentence. Go back to reading you're Bible and look for all of the hidden clues that suggest some of your holy men were Gay.
@stargirlsusan Just like slavery was always right then I take it? Just like interracial marriage was always wrong? Just like women being able to vote was always wrong? Just like burning women for witchcraft was always wrong?
The moral zeitgeist has changed dramatically over the decades (and follows a pretty clear route), your comment just shows an astounding lack of understanding of human history. In 10 years time people like you will be looked upon with the same disdain as the racists of old.
@MetalguitarlessonsUK "In 10 years time people like you will be looked upon with the same disdain as the racists of old" let's hope you're right, i hope they're bred out of the population. fundamentalist christians are next.....
Todd, is a hand walking queer. This is why she hates gays and is against gay marriage. If Prop. 8 past Todd would up and leave her white trash diva ass for a man more feminine. He don't know "Sarah is a man baby! yeah!!!"
It would be impossible to get elected in America with a pro gay marriage platform...Al Gore came out for gay marriage a few years back and he could never be the dem. candidate....Harsh but true....But Obama does believe in the Right to Privacy which has been a benchmark for the 3 states that had gay marriage until Nov. 4th.
Oh yea, she is the kind of person we need in the White House. Nooooot!
Im from Sweden where anyone can marry anyone, where religion is all but gone except as a curiousity, and where Sarah Palin would not have a snowballs chans in hell of being elected to anything.
A former beautyqueen? Pfffft, welcome to Sweden ;).
I wish Hilary was president. : ( Obama sucks and so does this shit.
starluverFrosty 10 months ago
today IS the time to experiment with socialist. equal rights and opportunity for all regardless of sex, race, ethnicity, socio-economic status, religion, sexual orientation. Socialism is for the benefit of society and the majority of citizens
antjcar86 1 year ago
What a complete, total, thorough and absolute idiot. YES, please run for President in 2012 to make it easier for my man Barack Obama..
mrhowardb 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Marriage "redefined?" Not at all. Lakota chief Crazy Horse had one or two male spouse(s) and many other Native American nations also have had what we now call same-sex marriages. Ethnographers have documented this. Some examples: Omahas, Zapotecs, Mohaves, Crow, Hidatsa, Ojibwa, Winnebago, Yuma and Timucua. Other cultures too. In 17th century Fukian Province China, same-sex marriages between gay men seem to have been common. And in West Africa, "woman marriage[s]" --a practice by many tribes.
seahorse05 1 year ago
to all obama haters if sarah runs in 2012 peaese give obama another chance he would be mush better then her
KELLSONIC 1 year ago
OWNED YOU BIGOTED BITCH AHAHHAHAHHHAH
BillKiernan 1 year ago
slutty mole slut slut
acf870 1 year ago
She always keeps mentioning her freaking holy , moral belief about the traditional definition of marriage when her family is not even moral. She eloped with her freaking stupid boyfriend without her parent's permission, letting her daughter have sex and live with her boyfriend as unmarried couples. Well, she has no problem with that because her daughter is heterosexual. What a hypocritical homophobe. If she has some nerve to run as a presidential candidate, she'll be the shame for all American.
Theclowcard 1 year ago
Get that stupid bitch off the television...
I myself am against Prop 8 and anything saying gay marriage is wrong...sarah palin liking P8 just renforces that opinion...
OH and for those people who say gay marriage is wrong and should be banned...
I'd like to see you go look a happy, loving couple of homosexuals and lesibens who love eachother just the same as a Man and Woman couple and say,"no, you're scum...you can't get married"
Jarethenator 1 year ago
I have a vast..variety...of sources! LMAO
goodjobhitman 2 years ago
HAHAlove the music
steffynorge 2 years ago
If I voted for traditional marriage, why is that "hate?" Hate never even entered my mind.
IntellectualAddict 2 years ago
so you voted for marriage between a man and a woman of the same color? why would you vote for that? oh, and voteing that african american slave's cant be married either? So you voted for that, good job.
jish55 2 years ago
"so you voted for marriage between a man and a woman of the same color?"
No. That wasn't in the text of the bill. But thanks for lying! Good job.
"voteing that african american slave's cant be married either?"
Which slaves? Can I meet them? What are their names and who owns them?
IntellectualAddict 2 years ago
ok, you said you voted for the "Traditional" form of marriage, and I was pointing out exactly what traditional marriage was up to the 1960's.
jish55 2 years ago
"ok, you said you voted for the "Traditional" form of marriage, and I was pointing out exactly what traditional marriage was up to the 1960's"
--You personal definition is erroneous, foolish, and moot. When everyone else uses the phrase "traditional marriage" they're referring to a union between a man & a woman.
No one really cares how you use the phrase.
IntellectualAddict 2 years ago
it not how I use the fraise, but it was how traditional marriage was until 1966 during the cival right's movement. You see, from the 1500's all the way to the 1960's, white's were not allowed to marry people of a different color or race, they had to stick with white people, and if you were a slave, than you were considered property and thus was not allowed to be married at all. So in saying your all for traditional marriage in america, that is what it mean's to be traditional. Now, if you were
jish55 2 years ago
"it not how I use the fraise, but it was how traditional marriage was until 1966 during the cival right's movement"
Great education you have there! How many words can you misspell in one sentence?
"that is what it mean's to be traditional"
Well, you keep living in the 1500s if you want (not sure how you do it exactly), and the rest of us will keep living in reality.
IntellectualAddict 2 years ago
and the reality is that homosexuals have the right to be married as well as straight's.
jish55 2 years ago
"and the reality is that homosexuals have the right to be married as well as straight's."
Of course they do. I've been saying this the whole time. Every fag has as much right to marry a woman as I do. And every nasty dyke has every right to marry a man as any other woman does.
See? We all have EQUAL rights. Isn't this country great?
IntellectualAddict 2 years ago
actually, bye taking saying that only a man and a woman has the right to wed each other, and that you can't marry the same sex is like the beginning of the holocaust. Bye smearing them for your own personal gain, it's what hittler did to the jew's at first, bye calling them filth, smearing them because they were different.
jish55 2 years ago
"Bye smearing them"
Where is the smear in saying we all have equal rights to marry a member of the opposite sex? And where is my personal gain?
"bye calling them filth, smearing them because they were different"
But they weren't different, other than their religion.
Wow, you really are stupid, aren't you? You even tried to use Hitler to make your point, and even failed at that because you can't even understand your own arguments. Wow!
IntellectualAddict 2 years ago
have you studied the holocaust, he did this to not only jews, but also to homosexual's, to blacks, to christeans. so look more into it before saying something, because I was pointing out that he is doing the same thing you are doing, except the only difference was the fact that it was a race of people, and you are doing this to someone of a sexual orientation.
jish55 2 years ago
"have you studied the holocaust"
Probably more than you. What Blacks did he do that to? Not too many Blacks in Germany, Austria, Poland, Russia, or Czechoslovakia back then.
"it was a race of people, and you are doing this to someone of a sexual orientation"
Again, your personal sexual preference of boinking dudes in the butt doesn't make you your own civil rights group. It simply doesn't apply in that circumstance. I know you really, really want it to, but it doesn't.
IntellectualAddict 2 years ago
when did I say I was gay? Ive never had sex with, or have ever found a man sexually attractive in any way. And ok, I might have gotten some of my fact's on the holocaust incorrect.
jish55 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"when did I say I was gay?"
It's in everything you write. You may not realize you're gay, but you're a fag thru & thru. Why bother attacking me so vehemently about this if it has nothing to do with you personally?
IntellectualAddict 2 years ago
talking about the redone term of marriage, than you would be correct, but you said traditional, so I was just explaining what it was, and if you want, I can even go further back and explain to you that up until christeanity was created, marriage was a buisness proposition between a man and the father of a woman. To where the father would sell his daughter for land, food, money, live stock, and other form's of valuable objects. And the man wasn't tied down to only having one wife, he was allowed
jish55 2 years ago
"the redone term of marriage"
HAAAHAA! Did you EVER attend school?
"so I was just explaining what it was"
I know what you were doing. And it was erroneous, foolish, and moot. I'm going to guess you only know one of those three words.
"I can even go further back"
You do that, and I'll quietly read on. And if I appear to be doing something else, don't worry, I'm actually still reading.
IntellectualAddict 2 years ago
as a matter of fact, yes, I did attend school like you said, and no, im not incorrect, or ignorant, but I do like the fact that you are showing some form of intelligence and would like to continue this debate. Bravo for using words that I learned when I was six.
jish55 2 years ago
"Bravo for using words that I learned when I was six"
My guess, then, is that you forgot them by the time you were seven, because you can't spell worth a shit.
IntellectualAddict 2 years ago
spelling and knowing the actual defenition are two different things, and bye the thing's your saying, it's showing me how ignorant you truelly are.
jish55 2 years ago
"spelling and knowing the actual defenition are two different things"
That's the only correct thing you've written up to this point. But knowing both is a mark of a smart and educated person.
You are obviously neither.
IntellectualAddict 2 years ago
excuse me? everything i've said has been politically correct and historically acurate. the fact that you don't research these thing's is showing the true idiot here.
jish55 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"everything i've said has been politically correct and historically acurate"
AAA-HAAAHAHAHAhahahahaaahahaaa!!! Oh man that's good! That's just great! Oh, please stop, my side! Oh, man. Yes, quite yes, you're being politically correct. But being PC has NOTHING to do with being correct or right or anything else other than being a minion for someone else's agenda.
And I never said you were wrong about your grand historic accounts of what marriage "used to be," did I? Not that I agree.
IntellectualAddict 2 years ago
but you keep going on about taking someone's right's away (even tho you keep blinding yourself bye saying their right's are still there, as long as it's with the opposite sex) And from what you keep saying, you are on Christeanity's agenda, I am protecting a group that really need's it, while you keep trying to take it away.
jish55 2 years ago
"you keep going on about taking someone's right's away"
Umm...wake up. You're the one writing that. Remember?
"I am protecting a group that really need's it"
With all the members of Congress & the media in general who are on their side, they somehow need protection? Really?
IntellectualAddict 2 years ago
yes, because they go through constant ridicule from over half of the us, including half of congress and the government. So yes, they do need it, and after prop 8, it show's that there are still many people against homosexual's.
jish55 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"after prop 8, it show's that there are still many people against homosexual's"
That's not what the text of the bill was, either. It was against homosexual marriage. Civil unions are still allowed, and most people are in favor of those.
You may not know jack shit about anything, but you're a good liar.
IntellectualAddict 2 years ago
as many as he could afford. What's even more intresting is that Jesus didn't change that in anyway, for he wasn't here to deal with marriage, but to teach the word of God. For you see, it wasn't until about 150 ad (when christeanity was created) that Marriage was even considered a sacralidge in the first place. So under technicality, traditional marriage is pretty much a useless statement.
jish55 2 years ago
"What's even more intresting"
What's more interesting is that you actually think anyone else is interested in your imbecilic musings.
Please let me know when you finally catch up to "today."
IntellectualAddict 2 years ago
catch up to today? you mean like how you are showing hatred twords others who are different from you? oh ya, im really living in the past, trying to treat others with respect and dignity.
jish55 2 years ago
"how you are showing hatred twords other"
Feel free to point out any hatred on my part. I see you didn't include any examples.
IntellectualAddict 2 years ago
calling people derogatory terms, like fag and dyke, instead of the correct term, bye trying to take away their right's because of their sexual orientation, bye calling me an imbacial because I misspell some words.
jish55 2 years ago
"instead of the correct term"
Who's correct term? Your terms? Their terms? How about my terms? I like my terms. They are no less "correct" than your terms, thanks.
"bye trying to take away their right's"
No, they have the SAME rights I do. Having a preference of a sexual nature doesn't make you a "civil rights group."
"calling me an imbacial"
I didn't call you an imbacial, I called you an imbecile. Because you are an imbecile. No hatred there, just a fact.
IntellectualAddict 2 years ago
so, your saying that homosexual, which are the correct term in the dictionary is an incorrect term? and yes, bye taking away their right to marry, your taking away their right's, and you just can't get that into YOUR thick, idiotic skull. Bye stating all these thing's you just did, it show's that you probably have a low intelligence and yet trying to prove other wise, ya, I might not be able to spell, but oh well, at least you know what I was saying, which I guess I should hand that to you.
jish55 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"your saying that homosexual, which are the correct term in the dictionary is an incorrect term?"
It's another term. It's scientific. Where does it say that's the "correct" term?
"taking away their right to marry"
Their right to marry still stands, you ninny.
"you probably have a low intelligence"
Is that supposed to mean something coming from you?
"at least you know what I was saying"
No you don't. You couldn't even understand your own Hitler argument. You're a dope.
IntellectualAddict 2 years ago
and fag/dyke are? And yes, bye taking away their right to marry the people they are in love with, and are attracted to is taking away their rights. And what do you mean bye "Understand my own hitler term" when did I show confusion in that? Because I re read my own message, and I didn't show any confusion, I was actually pretty clear on what I said.
jish55 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"and fag/dyke are?"
I never said they were. I said I like them better.
"taking away their right to marry the people they are in love with, and are attracted to is taking away their rights"
What if they loved a dog? Or a horse? Or 5 other people? Or their parents? Those are equally legitimate sexual preferences. Where are their rights? Why are you against their rights to marry? You Nazi!!
"when did I show confusion"
You showed confusion in what you wrote, you didn't understand it.
IntellectualAddict 2 years ago
calling me a nazi, now who's incorrect on thing's? because the nazi's were the type who were against homosexual's, jew's, christeans, people of a different color, different race, anything that was different from them... and from your past statement's, you are showing those trait's, not me. And no, I didn't show confusion in those acpect's, but as it seems, you did.
jish55 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"from your past statement's, you are showing those trait's, not me"
No, no, I'm talking about equality for everyone, and you're talking about taking away the rights of people who want to marry their parents, or another family, or their pets. You're the Nazi.
Baby killer! How many dogs have you kicked today?
IntellectualAddict 2 years ago
wow, are you searious? screw it, this has went from a debate to a retard trying to pretty much stay ignorant. Read all the post's, because not once have I ever pointed out about people marrying their mom or anything like that.
jish55 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"not once have I ever pointed out about people marrying their mom or anything like that."
That's just because you're against them. You're a mommaphobe. You just want to enact hate legislation against them, taking away their freedoms. Why are you so hateful and socially regressive? Maybe you belong in the Dark Ages. Keep your Dark Ages legislation off my body!
IntellectualAddict 2 years ago
You clearly have NO understanding of Nazism.
ignoranttwat 2 years ago
fucking bitch!
scata99 2 years ago
I "PRAISE THE LORD" that she didn't win....hehe.
BrownerNiner 2 years ago
hell... she was a vice-president candidate... jee... stupid americans...
nikf1eld 2 years ago
Agreed. Funny thing is 50 years from now people will look back and be like "Wow, there was a time when they didn't let gays to get married?". No one is "crying like a waterworks" because this isn't over.
smileforever2103 3 years ago
i know right...like how back then a black man and a white woman weren't allowed to get married...its the same shit...rights are being violated...people whose marriage are so fucked up they have to critisize others marriage..your right this isn't over
peggysue42 2 years ago
I HOPE it will take 50 years from now, and not 2009 years again...
ashin436 2 years ago
Only hicks supported Prop 8.
EatTinker 3 years ago 5
she still frightens me. the possibilities if she were VP.
squirrelygirl816 3 years ago
No matter what, everyone in this world is a damn socialist!!! quit saying ur not!! there is a left and right socialist agenda!!! We love Israel and we Love Britain!!! We SOCIALIZE with them!! USA is a right wing socialist platform!! Just like Nazi Germany was!!! Hopefully with Obama, it will change!!
ironshell90 3 years ago
I want to meet this "lesbo friend" of hers. I want to give her a good slapping for standing by this loony whack job bitch.
odessyrcr589 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
We, the majority, know what's best for you. You will now accept Prop. 8 as law. No need to thank us, we're just glad we could help by voting in the constitutional amendment.
RadarGuidedVermin 3 years ago
The California Supreme Court is set to overturn your ludacris amendment next week.
Gays and Lesbians will have the right to marry again.
JACKASS.
odessyrcr589 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sorry dipshit, the Supreme Court can only decide if it is constitutional or not. As Prop. 8 amended the constitution, it is constitutional by definition. Try again, loser.
RadarGuidedVermin 3 years ago
Look at history. An amendment was added that banned interracial marriage, and yet, the supreme court repealed that. History will just repeat itself in the name of equality.
la23fan 3 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"A man and a woman" dipshit. It doesn't matter what color they are. Now piss off, and take your racial bullshit with you.
RadarGuidedVermin 3 years ago
Wow. You're very intellectual-using words like "dipshit" and such. I guess we're done talking. Try not to cry when Prop 8 is repealed and gay marriage lives again!
la23fan 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
And how intellectual are you crying like a waterworks? Grow a backbone you sniveling wuss. The majority voted and they don't want gay marriage. Deal with it.
RadarGuidedVermin 3 years ago
music too loud buddy
pedreiramoar 3 years ago
music, while being well chosen, was much too loud.
Yeremita 3 years ago
palin is just in her own fun little world. this music is like her theme song! lol
spankythedog56 3 years ago
oh if she only had a brain...has anyone ever noticed she looks like shes on drugs 24/7 ... and belongs to an occult ... i think there should be a proposition 9 on ever hearing Sarah Palin speak again... all in favor ...
itziebitz 3 years ago
Thank you, ussick. In this sea of dark clouds, at least there's some light.
ptp44444 3 years ago
palin, what a fuckin idiot, the magazine thing was funny though
TheReference1 3 years ago 3
Did she do anything mean to you guys at your school that makes you call her that? She must have been mean if you say that.
mccainorobama 3 years ago
Oh Lord WHAT A STUPID WOMAN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lanceisabeach 3 years ago
she needs to get laid
ZamoraProductionsTM 3 years ago
*raises hand* ILL DO IT!
lol
(as long as she doesn't talk O.o)
spankythedog56 3 years ago
aww :( so sorry you had to go through that.
totally agreed, she's a major bitch
Living4The1Rhythm 3 years ago 2
Hey! that's offensive to bitches! :P
SHSH1212 3 years ago
so your saying that she can still run its just no one will vote for her?
TimmyB4 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sarah is the best! Despite the evil left's agenda to disparage her. Go girl!
asmeal01 3 years ago
Agreed, asmeal01. You summed it up extremely well. Sarah Palin is a tremendous leader and person.
ptp44444 2 years ago 3
i fucking hate sarah palin, and im glad she lost she better not run in 2012 or ill be extremely pissed
TimmyB4 3 years ago 4
Thank God Obama won. Sarah Palin is an idiot.
DanielleMcOrmond 3 years ago 9
haha exactlyyy!lol you said it!
tinkerbella9076 3 years ago
Oh god sarah
tinkerbella9076 3 years ago
The fact the wizard of oz music is in the background bugs me. lol
BrandonHarami 3 years ago
"Amend our constitution," good luck with that Sarah.
Isabella8466 3 years ago
The music made it extra creepy, i hate her.
evanescenceishot 3 years ago 2
yes on 8 it passed already people
they are not taking any rights away stop with this victime kindalike campain u want to control peoples minds
is no on same sex marriage , is just the natural way, have ur own mind stop hearing this propaganda nonsence, what's right is right always, it never chages no matter what time it is,
stargirlsusan 3 years ago
I was going to remove this nonsensical comment, but I think it speaks volumes as to the "sophistication" and intelligence of the Yes on 8 cretins (look it up, darlin' ... a dictionary might be a good investment, lol).
bebopbetty 3 years ago
now u don't make any sence, i wouldn't be surprice if u delet it, they allways try 2 hide the truth
stargirlsusan 3 years ago
You know when people like you leave comments like these you really should check spell check first... I don't respect people who mis-spell sooo many words in only one sentence. Go back to reading you're Bible and look for all of the hidden clues that suggest some of your holy men were Gay.
jadecalhoun 3 years ago
there is only one thing i'm sorry about spelling "nothig else"
stargirlsusan 3 years ago
LOL!!!
QueerLiberation 3 years ago
@stargirlsusan Just like slavery was always right then I take it? Just like interracial marriage was always wrong? Just like women being able to vote was always wrong? Just like burning women for witchcraft was always wrong?
The moral zeitgeist has changed dramatically over the decades (and follows a pretty clear route), your comment just shows an astounding lack of understanding of human history. In 10 years time people like you will be looked upon with the same disdain as the racists of old.
MetalguitarlessonsUK 1 year ago
@MetalguitarlessonsUK "In 10 years time people like you will be looked upon with the same disdain as the racists of old" let's hope you're right, i hope they're bred out of the population. fundamentalist christians are next.....
BillKiernan 1 year ago
Skunk!
mendoza14344 3 years ago
FAKE
Linkiscool6 3 years ago 2
Lol .... I'm laughing so hard at the music I can barely listen. Consider running a banner at the bottom ... "And such as, and such as and such as."
Sarah ...our Alaskan Beauty Queen
Isabella8466 3 years ago
citrus-LOL. What does that mean, exactly? What are they FOR, then? Obama said he does not support gay marriage. Sounds like he's AGAINST it.
3e3op88 3 years ago
Hello,
Im Sarah. Im 12 and I love Hitler!
Tracking88 3 years ago
Yeah baby! Back to Siber... er, I mean Alaska.
PeddlePowerSF 3 years ago
Todd, is a hand walking queer. This is why she hates gays and is against gay marriage. If Prop. 8 past Todd would up and leave her white trash diva ass for a man more feminine. He don't know "Sarah is a man baby! yeah!!!"
jazmundln 3 years ago
LOL!!!
iamlistening2u 3 years ago
Surely, those of you voting for Obama know that he, too, is against gay marriage.
3e3op88 3 years ago
But his campaign is AGAINST Prop 8!
bebopbetty 3 years ago
Obama believes in giving more rights to gays than McCain would even consider!
Biden is for marriage as between 1 man and 1 woman, but doesn't believe in pushing his own personal religious beliefs on other people!
qt4good 3 years ago
It would be impossible to get elected in America with a pro gay marriage platform...Al Gore came out for gay marriage a few years back and he could never be the dem. candidate....Harsh but true....But Obama does believe in the Right to Privacy which has been a benchmark for the 3 states that had gay marriage until Nov. 4th.
jazmundln 3 years ago
She makes me ashamed to be a woman!
THIS takes away rights.....
Plain and simple.
STOP DISCRIMINATION ---------
Domestic Partnership does not grant the same RIGHT AS MARRIAGE! STOP LYING!!!!!!
TheEqualityCampaign 3 years ago 6
It is horrifying that this imbecile is so close to the presidency. What papers do you read? "All of them!"
A very compelling argument, bebopbetty!
Dramphooey 3 years ago 3
She's so damn dumb!!!
chrisfrost103 3 years ago
not dumb...just wrong
azjeffs 3 years ago
Totally agree with you, shes a very intellegent woman, but is making a wrong decision
Shyguymysterio 3 years ago
Oh yea, she is the kind of person we need in the White House. Nooooot!
Im from Sweden where anyone can marry anyone, where religion is all but gone except as a curiousity, and where Sarah Palin would not have a snowballs chans in hell of being elected to anything.
A former beautyqueen? Pfffft, welcome to Sweden ;).
dsjoakim35 3 years ago 6