Tarkovsky was not remotely Russia's best filmmaker. The man was basically weird and whatever he had to say got garbled in his private obsessions with his own personal traumas.
I recently put my film, "Meeting Andrei Tarkovsky" onto Amazon. Please consider ordering a copy! Each sale is a huge help to this independent venture, and all profits will help me go on tour with the film to continue introducing people to Tarkovsky!
@trakovskyfilm You're just trying to capitalize on the fact that your name is spelled almost the same way. That's a cheap gimmick. Why don't you just make your own films and see how good they are? AT is a highly overrated, outdated Soviet-era phenomenon. Lift up your head and see the sky. AT had an inflated notion of himself, and hated the work of just about everybody else... Which is a pretty dumb way to look at the movies. There's lots of good stuff out there. Define yourself in your own right
I agree completely. Post-war soviet cinema's two gods are Tarkovsky and Parajanov. To complete the holy trinity of Soviet cinema you'd have to add Dovzhenko. Their films seem to be shot on a different planet than planet earth, they seem to come from a different world. Barnet is another magician.
What's so special about Parajanov is, although he had such a difficult life, his films contain so much love for the seemingly profane things in life, like through the eyes of a child.
Although this is master Tarkovsky's forum, I thought I should chime in here in defense of Kubrick. First, you need to go back to school and learn to write clearly, then take a summer course in cinema history. Kubrick was the ONLY major film director to have FULL control of every project from a major movie studio (Warner Brothers). He had such autonomy that during its orig. release (1971), he pulled "A Clockwork Orange" from every theater in England because of threats to his family. Thats power.
as to "publicity"???? what does that mean? Stanley Kubrick was always a recluse (even during his creative apex). He never enjoyed the limelight or the hype machine.
Every one is talking this rubbish.You are just repeating. A teacher?
Power is how you are creating film in your head. Good relationships to Warner Brothers? Are major movie studios deciding, who is good? Probably for you, but not for me.
"A Clockwork Orange" is a very borrowing stupid film, tasteless and vulgar. What else?
we all create fantastic narratives in our heads, the power is the manifestation of that vision in order to share it with an audience....whether it be in art-house cinemas to mall cineplexes. Whether you dig Kubrick or not is not my concern, But at your age of 40, Its disturbing how angry you are with your vile language. Half the stuff you write "gay fucked"?? doesnt even make sense other than illustrate how low you are on the evolutionary ladder.
understanding the film or not. A film should be an independent entity. It should be able to stand on its own feet unless specifically stated otherwise by the makers.
That being said. I really love solyaris and the book is a terrific read on its own :)
Though I think that Andrei became too introverted in his later films. Most of them only consisting of endless panning and rambling philosophical speeches. For me at least. I know most critics love them though and maybe they where the target.
For me he is not only a genius, he is a Master...that one who can lead other through the path of true spirituality, the path of joy and self-realization. He is the only filmaker who revolutionated cinema as an artistic way to enlight humanity. Thanks Tarkovsky, you never imagined your work will touch some many.
Along with Bergman (my fav.), Bala, Bresson and Fellini - He is, the greatest cinematic artist.
I am disturbed when rating Kurosawa. I found Ikiru, and his adaptations of Shakespeare and Dostoevsky fabulous. But Seven Samurari, though great, is not iconic like they make it out to be. I'd put Rasomon ahead.
Of late, I must say, I've been greatly surprised at how much I've been enjoying Kieslowski, Holland, and other polish directors.
i call this man a poet.his films were poetry...lyrical images with immaculate beauty.biggest influence on my perspective of viewing cinema n life itself.anything on this man will be put 2 d epitome of respect frm ma side.good n thanx
I agree. Tarkovski is among the very few directors who were a true artist. He lived FOR making films, as opposed to living FROM making films.
His films are beatiful, poetic, and inspiring.
It is only now in the 21st century that his legacy is starting to be reflected upon the work of directors such as Sokurov, Kiarostami, Reygadas, Bilge Ceylan.
Tarkovsky was not remotely Russia's best filmmaker. The man was basically weird and whatever he had to say got garbled in his private obsessions with his own personal traumas.
1mariamariamaria 9 months ago
I recently put my film, "Meeting Andrei Tarkovsky" onto Amazon. Please consider ordering a copy! Each sale is a huge help to this independent venture, and all profits will help me go on tour with the film to continue introducing people to Tarkovsky!
trakovskyfilm 1 year ago 5
@trakovskyfilm You're just trying to capitalize on the fact that your name is spelled almost the same way. That's a cheap gimmick. Why don't you just make your own films and see how good they are? AT is a highly overrated, outdated Soviet-era phenomenon. Lift up your head and see the sky. AT had an inflated notion of himself, and hated the work of just about everybody else... Which is a pretty dumb way to look at the movies. There's lots of good stuff out there. Define yourself in your own right
1mariamariamaria 9 months ago
he was a great poet of cinema
Leirbag6891 1 year ago
Greatest directors my expert list 1. Sergei Eisenstein 2. Andrey Tarkovsky 3. Ingmar Bergman 4. Stanley Kubric 5. Alfred Hitchock 6. Akira Kurosawa 7. Federico Fellini 8. Kristof Kieslowski 9. David Lynch
10. Victorio de Sicca
zigifrojd 1 year ago
@zigifrojd you and everyone seems to be forgetting Parajanov. He and Tarkovsky complete the real possibilities of Cinema
GmanVid 1 year ago
@GmanVid
I agree completely. Post-war soviet cinema's two gods are Tarkovsky and Parajanov. To complete the holy trinity of Soviet cinema you'd have to add Dovzhenko. Their films seem to be shot on a different planet than planet earth, they seem to come from a different world. Barnet is another magician.
What's so special about Parajanov is, although he had such a difficult life, his films contain so much love for the seemingly profane things in life, like through the eyes of a child.
DonFarshido 4 months ago
@kipkicker I'm really looking for a new concrete dystopia, cos they seem hell bent on tearing down my own and replacing it with glass...
sondinium 1 year ago
True say Andrei
wunglow 1 year ago 2
What city is this film of?
sondinium 2 years ago
Tokio
perroloca 2 years ago
Thank you.
sondinium 2 years ago
osaka
ph1bbs 2 years ago
Much love.
sondinium 2 years ago
I heard when Kurosawa saw this sequence, he exclaimed: "This is the drive to my office!"
JanPB 2 years ago 7
I might have heard somewhere that the only still shot in this sequence is shot from his office. Could be wrong.
TourRoyale 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
One thing for sure - that 'Stalker' movie works very well against insomnia!
IoriYagamiKyo 3 years ago
what lousy translation!
e7cada 3 years ago
great visionary, hundred years ahead of his time.
Mazurka1001 3 years ago 23
This comment has received too many negative votes show
In terms of cinema Kubrick is pure zero,a gay fucked from money & major studios, from film ideology, developed in USA.
For Spielberg or Scorsese Kubrick is great, because they are self even more brutal fucked from the same things.
Generally you have to know, movie -or money-maker.The guys, who made money, try to buy also the title of movie maker, welcome to West.
nunhov 3 years ago
Although this is master Tarkovsky's forum, I thought I should chime in here in defense of Kubrick. First, you need to go back to school and learn to write clearly, then take a summer course in cinema history. Kubrick was the ONLY major film director to have FULL control of every project from a major movie studio (Warner Brothers). He had such autonomy that during its orig. release (1971), he pulled "A Clockwork Orange" from every theater in England because of threats to his family. Thats power.
VictorVonBoom 3 years ago 4
one of the few pure auteurs in the cinema history....
Tarkovsky and Kubrick sit at the top of the pantheon.
orangevideo 4 years ago 7
Kubrik again... Tarkovsky is to Stan as humanity is to publicity.
rlazera 4 years ago
Stan? do you mean STANislav Lem or STANley Kubrick?
orangevideo 4 years ago
as to "publicity"???? what does that mean? Stanley Kubrick was always a recluse (even during his creative apex). He never enjoyed the limelight or the hype machine.
VictorVonBoom 3 years ago 4
Every one is talking this rubbish.You are just repeating. A teacher?
Power is how you are creating film in your head. Good relationships to Warner Brothers? Are major movie studios deciding, who is good? Probably for you, but not for me.
"A Clockwork Orange" is a very borrowing stupid film, tasteless and vulgar. What else?
nunhov 3 years ago
Power is not "creating a film in your head"...
we all create fantastic narratives in our heads, the power is the manifestation of that vision in order to share it with an audience....whether it be in art-house cinemas to mall cineplexes. Whether you dig Kubrick or not is not my concern, But at your age of 40, Its disturbing how angry you are with your vile language. Half the stuff you write "gay fucked"?? doesnt even make sense other than illustrate how low you are on the evolutionary ladder.
VictorVonBoom 3 years ago 5
Blah-blah-blah... from sommer courses.
nunhov 3 years ago
You really don't understand film, nunhov
2ltben 3 years ago
Who is deciding that? First the question: What is film?
nunhov 3 years ago
@nunhov
Film is art. Very dificult to make expecially excellent films, like Eisensteins and Tarkovskys.
zigifrojd 1 year ago
you plainly dont understand the film and obviously have not read the book
najef01 2 years ago
understanding the film or not. A film should be an independent entity. It should be able to stand on its own feet unless specifically stated otherwise by the makers.
That being said. I really love solyaris and the book is a terrific read on its own :)
Though I think that Andrei became too introverted in his later films. Most of them only consisting of endless panning and rambling philosophical speeches. For me at least. I know most critics love them though and maybe they where the target.
jmalmsten 2 years ago
Comment removed
jkhgsdhgdhgjklsdhfgj 2 years ago
@jmalmsten seriously doubt that Tarkovsky made films to please the critics.
DavidF89999 1 year ago
I heard that this scene is from the hotel where Tarkovski stayed in to the Kurosawa's office.
RisingSun1984 4 years ago
For me he is not only a genius, he is a Master...that one who can lead other through the path of true spirituality, the path of joy and self-realization. He is the only filmaker who revolutionated cinema as an artistic way to enlight humanity. Thanks Tarkovsky, you never imagined your work will touch some many.
vjllopis 4 years ago 5
You are absolutely right. For me there was a before and an after 'Stalker'. I never thought films could be made like that.
carlitors 3 years ago 26
@carlitors -- I love Tarkovsky..
Along with Bergman (my fav.), Bala, Bresson and Fellini - He is, the greatest cinematic artist.
I am disturbed when rating Kurosawa. I found Ikiru, and his adaptations of Shakespeare and Dostoevsky fabulous. But Seven Samurari, though great, is not iconic like they make it out to be. I'd put Rasomon ahead.
Of late, I must say, I've been greatly surprised at how much I've been enjoying Kieslowski, Holland, and other polish directors.
glakshmiratan 1 year ago
He's a Cinematic GENIUS and a gift to CINEMA!
JoeyDee 4 years ago 5
i love the vid
tarkovsky explains it all in such simple words
pollonoir 4 years ago
i call this man a poet.his films were poetry...lyrical images with immaculate beauty.biggest influence on my perspective of viewing cinema n life itself.anything on this man will be put 2 d epitome of respect frm ma side.good n thanx
indnameof 4 years ago
I actually am I rather large Tarkovsky fan...and have filmed and written a tribute video for the genius of his work...
check it out if you have time.
Thank you.
Search "Poisoned Ink" to view it. It's a metaphor of the rise and fall of Tarkovsky's career as a filmmaker and artist...
thanks again.
queend7788 4 years ago
What's wrong with you, dude?
begundan 4 years ago
:-D
queend7788 4 years ago
Excuse me, you forget mr. Sergei Mihailovich Eisenstein.
luisritx 4 years ago
This scene is 70's Tokyo.
RisingSun1984 5 years ago
Shame the subs dont cover everything! But otherwise a wonderful film. A pity he only made 7 films
Jafferscake 5 years ago
Great, the scene from Solaris and i think, Tarkovski is a master of the Russian movies. That scene in Tokyo
and slow, but very pretty.
FabioMaglio 5 years ago
I agree. Tarkovski is among the very few directors who were a true artist. He lived FOR making films, as opposed to living FROM making films.
His films are beatiful, poetic, and inspiring.
It is only now in the 21st century that his legacy is starting to be reflected upon the work of directors such as Sokurov, Kiarostami, Reygadas, Bilge Ceylan.
chemijazz 5 years ago 2
Not only Russia's best filmmaker, but the best ever in the whole world.
luburoi 5 years ago 5
same old story
Bohmer1981 5 years ago
So true...
roadkill12 5 years ago
Very interesting ... wish it were longer. Thanks!
msf88 5 years ago
Thank you for posting.
Tarkovsky is my favourite director
HagiaSophia 5 years ago 2
Excellent. Tarkovsky = amazing.
SinsOfArcadia 5 years ago 2