@MackAxyzz : I think they used a dynamics compressor. As soon as there is some foreground sound the overall volume is reduced and the background is less audible.
@tizwah No a dynamic compressor can't do that . They had acces to the output of the computer to resynchronise it with the video . listen to the part where the vocal is soloed . the noise comes down before the voice kiks in .It doesn't sound AT ALL like a dynamic compressor with an ambient recording , there is absolutely no noise ( and I'm a sound engineer );)
@wutefuk Yes, because a random audio engineer showing an app can totally say if it takes advantage of the machine's CPU (or CPUs) or if it is simply sloppily coded. For example does it utilize the extra cores?
Also, it's a DESKTOP machine (not a Mac Pro), and the task is one of the most demanding ones you can do in audio land. Actually, the whole point of the video is that the software is great because this was not at all *possible* until now in this level of detail... Consider yourself pwned.
@wutefuk Yes, because a random audio engineer showing an app can totally say if it takes advantage of the machine's CPU (or CPUs) or if it is simply sloppily coded. For example does it utilize the extra cores?
Also, it's a DESKTOP machine (not a Mac Pro), and the task is one of the most demanding ones you can do in audio land. Actually, the whole point of the video is that the software is great because this was not at all *possible* until now in this level of detail... Consider yourself pwned.
@wutefuk Yes, because a random audio engineer showing an app can totally say if it takes advantage of the machine's CPU (or CPUs) or if it is simply sloppily coded. For example does it utilize the extra cores?
Also, it's a DESKTOP machine (not a Mac Pro), and the task is one of the most demanding ones you can do in audio land. Actually, the whole point of the video is that the software is great because this was not at all *possible* until now in this level of detail... Consider yourself pwned.
i love the idea of this, iam sure it great when on paper. but this video really ant a good selling point! i would love to see a HQ video with a desent computer to really show off what this can do.......
WOW!!! Talk about your "Killer APP"...This thing is a CPU HOGG!!! Yes...with TWO G's! The Hardware game is once again behind the Software game in terms of performance. To everyone on a dual-core or less (including me)...UPGRADE if you want this baby!
@pjdaprinz - A mac cost much more than a computer with the same specs, even if a professional puts them together by hand. Of course, Windows is a piece of shit but at least, it doesn't prevent being run on a Computer by any other manufacturer.
Now, the point of stability. First of all, the Mach Kernel isn't more stable than a Linux or BSD Kernel, it's even comes with less features. For the rest I'm running out of chars... In views of Software, Apple has nothing to offer that you can't get free.
WOW! This is really amazing. While Melodyne DNA is magic, this is almost scary...out of earth technology. Of course we'll have to see if it can deliver good quality results on all tracks(which I doubt). I am very impressed by the demo so far. This is FAR more exciting than DNA!
If this can remove drums from a track I ll buy it... no matter the price. seriously that sounds like a revolution for sampling ... even though I probably only would use it for pre-sampling.
I think its great. We have seen so many applications develop over time and to see this type of technology, at this stage, seems promising. I think the most immediate application for this would be remixes but at that price point, it may not be worth it.. Will be keeping an eye on this to see how it develops! Good work!
I would hardly call the mix sparse. Also, I don't think so. Melodyne doesn't work at all with voice (or so it says on their faq page!) and neither with entire mixes - all you can do is change the pitch of a single polyphonic instrument like a piano track. not very impressive if you ask me. If they ever release it, that is... Melodyne dna has been vaporware for more that a year now.
I guess Melodyne with DNA from Celemony will be able to get similar results out of such sparse mixes like "Don't Give Up" (by Peter Garbriel).
I don't think we'll see lots of praise about this particular software. I think there's a lot of room for improvements on usability, computing power/overhead and price.
@ilterocktive : I agree and DNA use much less resources while processing audio in real-time.
I think most people didnt realised yet, that it could encode audio with the highest processing resolution if You slide the circle to the right end position while You activated the arrow +- option in the editor.
The 'ghosts' could be activated with selecting and double clicking them.
I was talking to them at messe and they said they would be coming out with a lite version at the end of the year. not sure if that one has all the features of the pro version (i guess not) but at least its more affordable. i find the results to be pretty decent, you wouldn't be able to use the vocals alone but you could certainly use them in a (re)mix. considering the alternatives (=none) this program seems pretty cool, IMHO. :-)
Well I might of been a bit hard on them considering I'm listening to a YouTube video - sheesh! (Prosoniq, you need un-compressed audio demos.) I'm also maybe even a little bummed that I will never be able to afford this software even though I make a living in pro audio. But no matter what efforts went into their development it doesn't justify 1800 unless it's perfect. I might be wrong about it's real potential though and will stay open to further listening and developments. Cheers.
ha... well... yes I'm an audio pro for 20 years.. that's how I make a living and worked for major studios and rock stars.. but that doesn't mean I'm rich. IF you were an audio pro you'd know that audio is the last thing done on post production and music is free now.
NOTE! I'm not trying to bash this software unfairly as much as comment on what I hear... 'looks promising' seems to be what a lot of folks here are saying.
Well, I can't speak for them but I know they've invested considerable research into this for the past ten years so I guess that's why it is rather expensive. Personally I think the results are absolutely astonishing, especially given the fact that the Jazz piece has so many instruments in the same range.
Many other companies have tried this and failed, and before their product there was no way to do this AT ALL. If you think about this I find the quality truly amazing....
Well.. almost amazing.. I don't know how you can charge $1800 bucks when it's not extracting absolutely perfectly... sorry guys but there's just too many artifacts or other sound elements in the Gabriel voice & trumpet extraction....
you should really investigate about this guys previous works and technologies.taking that work in account this is surely just a tip of the iceberg about what this piece of software really is.
Awesome Video. Youtube can be a great asset for you. If you need any help getting your video exposed check out this site called sl8t.(com) It has really done wonders for me, I have built 3 channels up with videos at top in position, this is my forth channel I'm going to working on now.
Sorry for the parenthesis around the com, some reason Youtube will not let you give an actual address in a comment. Real weird. Have a Blessed day!
what was the jazz song?
tub99899 3 weeks ago
@tub99899 I don't know this is not my machine. This is from a tradeshow
tizwah 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
HaniiPuppy 4 months ago
@delfinoloskakoka Works on my trusty old 2006 MacBook Pro without a hitch.
tizwah 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
oi amigo boa nite. gosta se esse programa tira vinheta de cima da musica... meu MSN ( engelmarley_coleciona@hotmail.com )
engelberthification 11 months ago
i think they doctored the audio after the fact to help sell the software ;>
MackAxyzz 1 year ago
@MackAxyzz : would make sense, except for the fact that this is an independent magazine that recorded this.
tizwah 1 year ago
wow; how did you remove the background noise from the room while the sample clip played? ;>
MackAxyzz 1 year ago
@MackAxyzz : I think they used a dynamics compressor. As soon as there is some foreground sound the overall volume is reduced and the background is less audible.
tizwah 1 year ago
@tizwah No a dynamic compressor can't do that . They had acces to the output of the computer to resynchronise it with the video . listen to the part where the vocal is soloed . the noise comes down before the voice kiks in .It doesn't sound AT ALL like a dynamic compressor with an ambient recording , there is absolutely no noise ( and I'm a sound engineer );)
Richoutandtouch 1 year ago
@Richoutandtouch Certainly as a sound engineer you must have heard about a lookahead compressor?
tizwah 1 year ago
Thanks for telling what the software is called you fucking idiot. go suck a dick.
jfootballfreak06 1 year ago
@jfootballfreak06 the guy in the vid did, but he cant talk right lol
massmayhem12 1 year ago
HEAR THAT? That machine isn't fast enough. Take that Apple fanboys.
wutefuk 1 year ago
@wutefuk maybe cause it's an imac!? douche. think about it. a mac pro would be able to do much more.
Kishgofu 1 year ago
@wutefuk Yes, because a random audio engineer showing an app can totally say if it takes advantage of the machine's CPU (or CPUs) or if it is simply sloppily coded. For example does it utilize the extra cores?
Also, it's a DESKTOP machine (not a Mac Pro), and the task is one of the most demanding ones you can do in audio land. Actually, the whole point of the video is that the software is great because this was not at all *possible* until now in this level of detail... Consider yourself pwned.
foljs 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wutefuk Yes, because a random audio engineer showing an app can totally say if it takes advantage of the machine's CPU (or CPUs) or if it is simply sloppily coded. For example does it utilize the extra cores?
Also, it's a DESKTOP machine (not a Mac Pro), and the task is one of the most demanding ones you can do in audio land. Actually, the whole point of the video is that the software is great because this was not at all *possible* until now in this level of detail... Consider yourself pwned.
foljs 1 year ago
@wutefuk Yes, because a random audio engineer showing an app can totally say if it takes advantage of the machine's CPU (or CPUs) or if it is simply sloppily coded. For example does it utilize the extra cores?
Also, it's a DESKTOP machine (not a Mac Pro), and the task is one of the most demanding ones you can do in audio land. Actually, the whole point of the video is that the software is great because this was not at all *possible* until now in this level of detail... Consider yourself pwned.
foljs 1 year ago
Como se llama el programa?????
eric892892 2 years ago
Will it be available in Asda? those pops an clicks are so 80's
eyelivehere 2 years ago
Comment removed
eyelivehere 2 years ago
"all the frequencies you can think of".... hehe.. wow... impressive :)
jensenzo 2 years ago 4
hehehe I like your comment. ;D Impressive software!
MrKarlalfred88 2 years ago
i love the idea of this, iam sure it great when on paper. but this video really ant a good selling point! i would love to see a HQ video with a desent computer to really show off what this can do.......
vinylrider69 2 years ago
the program should recognize what the compressor did in the original mix and reverse it to get less volume changes
keysersozeh 2 years ago
3:56 - 4:05.......awkward. lol
lpfandr 2 years ago 2
LOL
mpchead621 2 years ago
1.700 $ !!! oh my god
Elimnio 2 years ago
euros! lol thats about $2500! not to mention that it sounds pretty much shit. they are out their minds to charge this much.
nexusdb 2 years ago
WOW!!! Talk about your "Killer APP"...This thing is a CPU HOGG!!! Yes...with TWO G's! The Hardware game is once again behind the Software game in terms of performance. To everyone on a dual-core or less (including me)...UPGRADE if you want this baby!
najiatwa01 2 years ago 2
... upgrade... a mac?
hahahahhaaha
jian2069 2 years ago
Haha...yea..meaning add ram or get a new one. Lol
najiatwa01 2 years ago
idiot
kingsalasi 2 years ago
What's so funny?
Just because it's more work to upgrade doesn't mean that's impossible.
If you have a Mac Pro you can pretty much upgrade everything.
pjdaprinz 1 year ago
it's more work and way more expensive
macs are way overpriced.
at the same specs it would be probably like PC $300
MAC $1000
jian2069 1 year ago
Macs are a bit more expensive than PCs, but not as much as you think.
Also, they are more reliable. I worked in a studio once where Pro Tools run on a PC.
We only had problems with it. Sync problems, crashes during recording, you name it.
We switched to a Mac system and had never (and I mean NEVER) ever problems of any kind.
That's the main reason I use a Mac for everything.
And that's definitely worth to pay a little more when you buy one.
pjdaprinz 1 year ago
@pjdaprinz - A mac cost much more than a computer with the same specs, even if a professional puts them together by hand. Of course, Windows is a piece of shit but at least, it doesn't prevent being run on a Computer by any other manufacturer.
Now, the point of stability. First of all, the Mach Kernel isn't more stable than a Linux or BSD Kernel, it's even comes with less features. For the rest I'm running out of chars... In views of Software, Apple has nothing to offer that you can't get free.
1JoR 1 year ago
@jian2069 Yes, please do perpetuate a myth that has been totally BUSTED in each and every comparison ever done "at the same specs"...
foljs 1 year ago
that is amazing
toolroommk 2 years ago
Amazing technology, and think what kind of remixes/mashups you'll be able to do with that...
backslash68 2 years ago
WOW! This is really amazing. While Melodyne DNA is magic, this is almost scary...out of earth technology. Of course we'll have to see if it can deliver good quality results on all tracks(which I doubt). I am very impressed by the demo so far. This is FAR more exciting than DNA!
wiegerbrostring 2 years ago
If this can remove drums from a track I ll buy it... no matter the price. seriously that sounds like a revolution for sampling ... even though I probably only would use it for pre-sampling.
ProdigyOnSpeed 2 years ago
I think its great. We have seen so many applications develop over time and to see this type of technology, at this stage, seems promising. I think the most immediate application for this would be remixes but at that price point, it may not be worth it.. Will be keeping an eye on this to see how it develops! Good work!
thomasemmanuel 2 years ago
needs some work on the transients. not bad.
kipplekeeper 2 years ago
I would hardly call the mix sparse. Also, I don't think so. Melodyne doesn't work at all with voice (or so it says on their faq page!) and neither with entire mixes - all you can do is change the pitch of a single polyphonic instrument like a piano track. not very impressive if you ask me. If they ever release it, that is... Melodyne dna has been vaporware for more that a year now.
tizwah 2 years ago
I guess Melodyne with DNA from Celemony will be able to get similar results out of such sparse mixes like "Don't Give Up" (by Peter Garbriel).
I don't think we'll see lots of praise about this particular software. I think there's a lot of room for improvements on usability, computing power/overhead and price.
ilterocktive 2 years ago
@ilterocktive : I agree and DNA use much less resources while processing audio in real-time.
I think most people didnt realised yet, that it could encode audio with the highest processing resolution if You slide the circle to the right end position while You activated the arrow +- option in the editor.
The 'ghosts' could be activated with selecting and double clicking them.
Nord72 2 years ago
Comment removed
ilterocktive 2 years ago
I was talking to them at messe and they said they would be coming out with a lite version at the end of the year. not sure if that one has all the features of the pro version (i guess not) but at least its more affordable. i find the results to be pretty decent, you wouldn't be able to use the vocals alone but you could certainly use them in a (re)mix. considering the alternatives (=none) this program seems pretty cool, IMHO. :-)
tizwah 2 years ago
Well I might of been a bit hard on them considering I'm listening to a YouTube video - sheesh! (Prosoniq, you need un-compressed audio demos.) I'm also maybe even a little bummed that I will never be able to afford this software even though I make a living in pro audio. But no matter what efforts went into their development it doesn't justify 1800 unless it's perfect. I might be wrong about it's real potential though and will stay open to further listening and developments. Cheers.
randmotu 2 years ago
If you were an actual audio Pro you would know that $1800 on a great plug in for your rig is nothing.
Additionally an actual Pro would know that this is fucking awesome and buy it rather than complain about the price.
AlienSexDog 2 years ago
ha... well... yes I'm an audio pro for 20 years.. that's how I make a living and worked for major studios and rock stars.. but that doesn't mean I'm rich. IF you were an audio pro you'd know that audio is the last thing done on post production and music is free now.
randmotu 2 years ago
NOTE! I'm not trying to bash this software unfairly as much as comment on what I hear... 'looks promising' seems to be what a lot of folks here are saying.
Peace
randmotu 2 years ago
Well, I can't speak for them but I know they've invested considerable research into this for the past ten years so I guess that's why it is rather expensive. Personally I think the results are absolutely astonishing, especially given the fact that the Jazz piece has so many instruments in the same range.
Many other companies have tried this and failed, and before their product there was no way to do this AT ALL. If you think about this I find the quality truly amazing....
tizwah 2 years ago
Well.. almost amazing.. I don't know how you can charge $1800 bucks when it's not extracting absolutely perfectly... sorry guys but there's just too many artifacts or other sound elements in the Gabriel voice & trumpet extraction....
randmotu 2 years ago 7
you should really investigate about this guys previous works and technologies.taking that work in account this is surely just a tip of the iceberg about what this piece of software really is.
antidogmatiq 2 years ago
@randmotu it's 499 EUR I think
tizwah 1 year ago
AMAZING!!!!
MyonMuzik 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Awesome Video. Youtube can be a great asset for you. If you need any help getting your video exposed check out this site called sl8t.(com) It has really done wonders for me, I have built 3 channels up with videos at top in position, this is my forth channel I'm going to working on now.
Sorry for the parenthesis around the com, some reason Youtube will not let you give an actual address in a comment. Real weird. Have a Blessed day!
Have A Good one!
Maximilliaryh 2 years ago