Added: 4 years ago
From: 55ella2007k
Views: 1,515
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Obama has inherited that power.

    It seems he likes that power as log as he's the dictator.

  • thanks you....makes one wonder if this Directive 51 has anything to do with Area 51. think about it...

  • It seems to be more parallel with the directive 51 mandated by Hitler . You make a good point though.

  • Hitler's Directive 51 was about troop movement to the west. It was a purely technical directive involving logistics. It wasn't a power grab at all. You ought to read Hitler's Directive 51 and then read Bush's to see how different they are.

    That said, Fuck Bush. Fuck the NWO. Spread the word.

  • there is a large portion of the thrust of it that is the same. Hitler directed that government agencies should basically do the fuck what they are told and not interfere with his directions OR squabble among themselves about those directives. In other words it created an atmosphere where any questioning of Hitler or his orders could result in arresting of a judiciary or police arm that questioned it. In that element, the two directives in their end result are highly similar (though not entirely)

  • Werry good video thank you, this is scarry stuff!

  • Hi I mentioned your video on my readio show last night 29/02/08 if you are interested - Go to blog radio on the internet and search The Deafening Silence Radio Show

  • Well done. NSPD 51, and all applicable Ex orders and directives, must be deemed unconstitutional and revoked. Even the public (unclassified) sections grant directorial power to the executive branch over the other branches, and state, local and territorial governments.

  • I read this back during the summer. I know people who believe it's a wonderful idea.  pffft

  • oops sorry for the double post, I often think my comments are lost when they dont appear, but they often are only visible to me after I post a 2nd time. :(

  • Thanks for the vid,

    I had heard about it but when I read it I didnt notice anything strange. But I admit that in all the bureaucratic spagetti I had not noticed the secret provision that has not escaped your decerning eye. Its strange, what is it they dont want people to know, why dont they want people to know and if theres an emergecy there wont be time to scrutinize it it'll just be implemented.

  • Thank you very much, I had read it but it was too confusing to figure it out, and did not notice anything wrong, but I had not noticed that one of its provisions was secret, which is very strange, first because you wonder why they want to hide something, second because if there is an emergeny there wont be time to scrutinize it and chances are it will be implemented whether people like it or not.

  • I recently found out about this directive from a response of another user.  I went to the white house website and read it, not all of it. Didn't get to the last few paragraphs. I'll have to do a little more homework on it.

  • thanks for posting this

  • Where can i go to learn more about this?

  • google "directive 51". I believe the white house copy is the first thing to come up. you can read the whole thing there.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more