Added: 3 years ago
From: nautphil
Views: 48,407
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (313)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Bye Bye America . America should know that the world is changed . America is not the first power anymore . Death to America .

  • good luck on the whole threatening the world thingy

  • US Navy has mostly had hands tied in the Gulf. If the hammer came down, those missile boats would be splinters. Never doubt it.

  • NO

  • Do NOT under estimate the Iranian Navy. YOU FOOLS! Asymmetric warfare, for Iran means, they will get upwind of the US (or any western navy) and stink us out! True fact! If you get to "Leeward", or "asymmetrically below" an Iranian Navy vessel, the B.O. will neutralize our sailors. That's it! They dont shower for months, years even! They wear polyester crap, put on more cologne, some cheese, and we're dead! Asymmetrically dead.

  • this doctrine were taken from the SFRY

  • And just how the hell do they plan to take out a carrier task force?!?!

  • which country first used nuke guyz....i think mny ppl here doesnt know that or forgtten n saying how gud they are...America already used nuke 2 times n they will use it again.Iran knows America is attacking one country after another (Afghanistan,Iraq - for oil open secret) n there turn is next.To save there ppl from torture,rape,abuse n murder by the hands of the most gentle n civilized nation Israel,America they need nuke.If they hv it den there enemy will afraid to attack..

  • Comment removed

  • pretty easy when you're not actually fighting anyone

  • What Iran is seeking to do is not to defend itself from the United States, the Russians, or even Israel.

    What Iran is trying to do is create a pantheon of enemies, a perpetual threat, to justify suppressing internal descent and ensure a perpetual theocratic and oligarchic rule.

    The real threat to the Iranian state is the Iranians themselves; a generation of young Iranians who will not live under the rule of clerics.

    The weapons don't matter...

  • @Waltham1892 I couldn't have said it better myself.

  • LOL. yeah they need to use asymmetric warfare techniques because there is no way they could defeat the United States and NATO in symmetric warfare. They would be obliterated. It's funny to read that some people think the Iranian technology could even compare to that of the United States. Ah hell, we invented everything modern - even using You Tube is an American Corporation. Intel is another American Corporation now used by Iranian military and it's main facility is in Israel. LOL. MohammedSucks

  • I WISH WAR NEVER HAPPEN ANY WHERE ANY TIME BUT W.W.1 EVIDENNCES SUGGEST THAT IN FACT IT ISNT THE WEAPONS OR TECHNOLOGY OF MILLITARIES THAT LEADS TO VICTORY IT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE WAR IN INDIVIDUALS MIND IN THE MILLITARY THAT BRINGS THE VICTORY ALONG . IN W.W 1 BRITISH WERE VERY WELL ARMED AT THE TIME AGAINST TURKS ( TURKEY ) BUT IT WAS THE TURKS WHO PUT THEIR LIFE TO DEFEND THEIR COUNTRIES BELIVING THAT , KILL OR KILLED IS VICTIRY

    I BELIVE THIS WILL BE THE CASE IN IRAN TOO

  • @m98m99 tl;dr don't use caps.

  • Just a wonderful peace loving country run by a bunch of religious lunatics.

  • @drgreez just like the US

  • So fucking gay.

  • Ohh fuck they got about 20 fuckin DSHKa machine guns on a patrol boat

  • I mean the report is not wrong. Iran North Korea and some others are the asymetric kings.

  • hey i thought yall could just rub the majic genie in the lamp and out comes aladin and the prince of persia what happened to that?

  • hey i thought all yall could just rub your majic genie in the lamp and out pops aladin and the prince of persia

  • Speed Boat Navy...LOL

  • LAWL

  • US cant do shit, i mean they can shit of course, but thats about it.

    If the us dogs could do anything and i MEAN anything that could harm

    THE ISLAMIC REPUPLIC, they will have don that, but you all saw the

    great IRANIEN people figthing with the whole world in 8 years.

    WE WON AND YOU CAN NOT TAKE IT, YOU ARE WELCOME TO TRY AGAIN!!

    this is a reply to all the anti Iran dogs!! Se ya i wouldent wonna be ya :-)

  • @amaljaalza And why Iran shit their pants when they saw us Fuck up Iraq in 21 days that Iran was not able to do in 20+ years. I personally have no problem with Iran, they are not a threat to US and if they want to make a N bomb, they should be allowed to. We got lasers and and Missile shield by 2020 so I think we will be ok.

  • @abhinav7333 Just for your information, Iraq is not Iran...

  • @amaljaalza I never said that, but Iran is really under-estimating US. Like everybody does. Advantages that US has: money, diversity, and geography.

  • this last post.....learn it.....copy it....THIS IS AS POWERFUL AS A NEUTON BOMB IN CRUSHING THE ILLEGAL ISLAMIC STATE OF IRAN GOVT!!THIS IS AN ABSOLUTE CRUSHER!!!I LOVE IT!!!

  • AYATOLLAH KOSSKHOLLAH KHAMEINI,KOSSGESH,KORRAYEH ZAMEEN TOO KOSSEH NAHNETT!!AHMADINEJAD,REEDAM TOO KOSSEH NAHNETT SAHGOH BEEYAHN BAYLEESAN!DARRAY CAHBAY TOO KOONEH,IMAM ZAMEEN KOONEE!!IMAM ALI SAHGKOSH,KOON NAMO BOH REESHAD POCK MEEKOHNAMM!KEERAM TOO KORAN,KOSSGESH!!

  • @ridusofthetonedeaf Wy do all you traitors eat from Dr Ahmadinejats

    and Ayatolah khomeinis ass, do you like that or what.

  • That is what small fishing villages will get if they don't vote for President Imadinnerjacket

  • How many of you idiots think that the I RAN bathtub navy can stand up to the US Navy? Seriously, only idiots like MrSF00011 are belivers.

  • @cbarsonfire your 42 years old, why are you on you tube on iranian military videos? explain that one lol

  • @cbarsonfire it can't, but that's not the problem, the problem is that in maybe 30 years they can

  • hmmmm!some machin guns have been placed on fast boats.dose that mean strong or classic navy?

  • Hahahaha...

    No.

  • Explosions @ 0. 35 look very staged to me. What kind of munition produces a large orange ball of flame and plumes of thick black smoke? maybe some sort of a FAB, but then again.......

  • @RonnieJamesable i was thinking the same...

  • A war with the US. You stooges in Iran need to go back and smoke your Hash!

    You have got to be kidding. What garbage do they feed you in Iran? That you can defeat the USA....WOW!

  • @cbarsonfire your a typical naive person who knows nothing about war, consequences. Iran can inflict more economic damage to US then US can do to iran. Oil is the back bone of american economy specially now knowing how fragile us economy is if oil prices jump to $300 barrel, The Ruling elite jews who control america could well face same reveloution and loose all they have. Plus how many of those destroyers n carriers can america to loose?

  • Comment removed

  • @cbarsonfire haha yeah ok another 30 year veteran Marine here, just like the many other internet Einsteins around lol yeah i was in the army as well for 20 years. i can straight away imagine hat your some fat lazy bum who hasnt left the computer chair or got laid for the past 10 years. anyway what the fuck are you doing on iranian military videos mr retied general? are you homeless like the other US retired soldiers? also what about what i said do you disagree with? you just rambled

  • @MrSF0011

    Funny sonny, but exactly how old are U? 24 year old twit from the land down under. Clearly you need a lesson in spellin..LOL Without oil your country will grind to a halt or maybe U just ride the roo's to work.

    I DISAGREE WITH ALL OF YOUR RAMBLE.

    .

  • @cbarsonfire funny you have no valid argument or even a argument, youve once again failed to state what you disagree with and keep rambling bulshit. lol if your as old as you make your self seem like i feel sorry for you. i think the fact that you need to get a life and get laid should be higher on your agenda then my spelling

  • @MrSF0011

    To answer ur ?

    "Don't argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience."

    Think about it...LOL

  • @cbarsonfire i see your strugling with come backs so you go on my profile and copy what i say to other people. after reading your profile its became evident that your a fucking tool.

    "I love the United States and hate those who wish to do our citizens harm'

    the only people who are doing the harming is your own government harming other people, and the only people wishing to do your citizens harm is also your government you brainwashed dumb fuck

  • @MrSF0011

    You just don't get the clues do you? The best you can do is to ramble about what you have no clue about. I CAN SPEND ALL DAY FUCKING WITH TURDS LIKE YOU.

    I wait with baited breath your witty come back.... Your a freaking joke and waste of air.

  • @cbarsonfire So what weapons system does the USA have, to engage large numbers of small craft maneouvering at high speed out of range of Phalanx, backed up by large numbers of small submarines operating in shallow LITTORAL waters and land based mobile supersonic sea skimming missiles which have a mach 4 terminal velocity? Please, enlighten me? Please dont start with name calling either, i want to hear your well thought out and analyzed response to my legitimate question. I'll be waiting!

  • @mattmatt115 The US Navy is right at the door step of Iran and has been there for years, just sitting there watching and waiting.

    I don't see any Iranian Carriers off the coast of Maine, Long Island or Florida.

    Cause Iran knows, if they ever tried, they'd get their ass blown right out of the water, not years later, but immediately.

    Lol!

  • @mattmatt115 Im confident that AEIGIS equiped destroyers would enough to deal with the "large" number of small craft/subs befor they got withen 100NM, remember the us navy doesent park 10 miles off the coast. The missiles you speak of will be shot down by CIWIS anti missile/ anti aircraft systems. this is of course asuming any of these weapons survive precision missile and air strikes, the main aim of which would be to cripple naval retaliation. weapons are half the battle tactics are the rest.

  • Iran can shut the oil off . with that supereb Navy of theres.. Wow , look at that! shock and AAAWW, Iran can do some damage. They can race out there in there speed boats and inflict carnaige..WOw...

  • Still iran won the war against iraq but iraq had support of usa and russia so think that usa is easy target for iran

  • Mmmmm..... I don't think the poster of this video understands the meaning of "asymmetric". Perhaps he got it confused with "antisymmetric."

  • Asymmetric warfare? Guns vs Missile. Carrier vs boats. That's quite Asymmetric.

  • Mr mj88, you should not comment on how we cannot win wars on our own, since we had to cross the pond not once, but TWICE, to bail your asses out of the fire. Had we not had the lend lease program, Brits would have starved in

    '41, Donnitz ( Kriegsmarine) said so himself. I don't regret it. Most Brits aren't so ungrateful. We'll probably do it a third time since your continent is overrun by crazy muslims and no one there has the balls to check them. Don't worry, we'll save you.

  • use sub and the big bomb!

  • if you are a good asymmetrical warfare force means you make a good speed bump.

  • When is Israel going to take out the Iranian nuclear power plant? The US has in fact turned on Israel and in fact some suggest we defend Palestine and Iran in there quest to destroy Israel and subjagate Jew, Christian and Atheist, alike. When are we going to wake up and realize Extermist Muslims and Socialist Communists are now working together to destroy Israel and the Western world.

  • I love the determination of Iranian ppl..

  • Iran doesnt need military. All they have to do is block the Strait of Hormuz for a few months...this will cause many events to unfold, resulting in World Financial collapse.

    Small speedboats in modern warfare = Fast, convenient, reliable

    Missiles in modern warfare = Inflict some damage

    Submarines and Mines = Will scare the shit into the americans

    Iran is clever, instead of shooting the head, they will shoot the heart (metaphor)

    They have it planned.

  • solidarity to iran!

    from germany

  • oakcliff621 you forget we have had to fight in the uk don't forget IRA bombing in uk and the US goverment allowed IRA supporters financing them.

  • *yawn* Just make an apache fly above the angle of the rockets of those speed/PT boats and done.

  • Iran masters of being cheap, smoking opium and being dumb! =)

  • "Asymmetric naval warfare?" You mean running around in speedboats and small patrol craft and shooting machine guns around? I don't think the US 6th Fleet is going to be concerned anytime soon.

  • Iran is the major power of the world. No one can deny that. Attacking iran is unthinkable for US and Israel because that would result in destruction of israel and Usa.

  • @J4archae

    How? How could attacking Iran have any real, direct effect on either Israel or the USA? McHales navy aside, Iran has no way to project power. 1 B-2 bomber can carry more conventional weapons than all the missiles Iran has. So what can Iran do?

  • @J4archae Yes! I've been saying the same thing! Iran is THE MAJOR POWER OF THE WORLD. That's why the US gets all it's aircraft carriers, fighter planes, stealth bombers, spy satellites, from IRAN! Why? Because IRAN IS THE MAJOR POWER OF THE WORLD! Shame though they can't figure out of how to refine their own oil.

  • As the old saying goes, if the other guy wants to die for his country, let him...

  • Eaglex2010 you keep sayin usa this and usa that but the truth is usa can not /have not and never will win any wars on their own,the only way would be to nuke countrie as they did in ww2.most american believe too much in their own BS.How do i know this because i am an british ex-service man who fought along side us army.WE should all talk peace not war i for one have seen enough blood bath to last me 10 life times,so please lets all try for peace.

  • @MrMj88 if you were in service then you should know there will never be peace... maybe you should look at peace this way.. be glad there was peace in your motherland.. be glad the fight wasnt taken there

  • @MrMj88 Hey you ungrateful British fuck! If it wasn't for the nuke using US your ass would be GERMAN right now. If I remember correctly (figure of speech I know I am right) the Germans with through your asses like crap through a goose in WW II until the US got involved. Once we cam in we beat them back all the way back to Berlin until their surrender. Even kicking them out of Africa with Patton's 3rd army kicking the shit out of Romel all the way to Berlin. So SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!

  • @rextuner03 firstly go fuck yourself when you've done that if it was not for the british there would be more yanks killed.just like you yanks blah blah blah because of your american policy of interfering in other countries we are in this state as for usa using nuke dick head it was because japan bomed pearl harbour other wise you lot would not have entered the war germany was losing the war because they tried to advane during russian's cold winter.so do us all a favour FUCK OFF.

  • @rextuner03 THIS IS THE ONLY LANGUAGE SOME OF YOU AMERICANS UNDERSTAND MORON.

  • @rextuner03 SO MORON ON THAT NOTE THE FRENCH HELPED YOU KICK THE BRITISH OUT SO DOES THAT MEAN YOU HAVE TO SUCK THEIR DICKS GROW UP MORON IF THIS AND IF THAT IF YOUR AUNT HAD BALLS SHE WOULD BE YOUR UNCLE SO STOP TALKING SHIT AND LOOK AT THE WORLD NOW NOT WHAT HAPPENED 50/60 YEARS AGO.

  • @MrMj88 both the British AND the French got their asses kicked by the Germans for example we had to invade Normandy to take France back. You want to talk about now? Well last time I checked the US and Europe were allies. And your response didn't make much sense. But that makes sense considering how much of a dumbass you are. I don't expect much from people like you.

  • @rextuner03 ok another american moron what has happened in the past is past why bring up something from the past its the future to look forward to but like most americans you lot the world has to revolve around USA guess what those days are long gone wake up and smell your own bushits moron.

  • @MrMj88 Yeah who cares about it now that it's all over. If you were German right now then you would fucking care you dickless fuck!!! It's ungrateful fucks like you that make the US hate you.

  • @rextuner03 if you don't care about what has happened in the past dickhead why go on about it like whore who has been fucked and not got paid.

  • @MrMj88 God you are a fucking moron. You said that you didn't care about it because the past was the past and I was mock you saying yeah who cares since it's over. I am done, you are obviously a fucking tool.

  • @rextuner03 the only moron is idiots like you who think the world belongs to them you yanks think every on on this planet ows you something.your economy and dollar is dying so you create war to keep your country alive.On that note super power how come you have never won a war on your own if you have do list them we all would love to know.Americans are so arrogant that they are blind to criticism.

  • @MrMj88 The only blind and arrogant one here is you. And because other countries join us in war that makes us weak? Yeah EVERYONE hates America except for when they need something then WE LOVE AMERICA!!!!!!!! WE LOVE AMERICA SOOOO MUCH!!!! Yeah the dollar is going down the crapper because we spend so much money on countries that hate us buying up their oil for when the day turns around and we have all the oil they will buy it from us.

  • @rextuner03 blah blah blah get it through your head america is fucked and ignorant people like you think they own the world well think again.look at the way USA forcing its way on other countries.yet you have not mentioned which war has america won on its own?LET ME MAKE IT EASY FOR YOU AS THIS IS TOO HARD FOR YOU TO UNDERSTAND AMERICA HAS WON SHIT.

  • @rextuner03 you sound more like a 2year old go find out why other countries are building nuclear plant for reusable energy because in 50 -100yrs time when the oil is gone and these countries have nuclear energy USA can have all the oil in the world as it is going to be useless as would USA be.now go and shout and throw tantrums and swear as much as you want because you showed what your mentality is with your last remark.

  • @MrMj88 No what my TRUE mentality is that we should blow away every last crazy rag head off the face of the earth because they have never done anything good. All they do is kill eachother off because they believe in another god or some shit. That crazy fuck isn't looking for nuclear energy he wants a nuclear bomb. And he will use it on Israel and if he does then Iran will be a roasted curry smelling crater in the middle east! Ahhhh that would be great.

  • @rextuner03 you have got to be the dumbest f&^k on the internet. Whenever I start to believe people are getting smarter, some white sheet wearing prick like you shows his ugly face.

  • @turbodr3ams Sorry I have apologize my step son got onto my account and made several poor comments on my behalf. I am just now getting a flood of them regarding such crazy and racist comments. Trust me he has been dealt with. As far as me on this issue really I would LOVE to have world peace. But unfortunately with the world we live in obsessed with greed and power that won't ever happen. Sorry f what he said offended you or anyone else.

  • @MrMj88 why is it that every war we been in, we were helping out? first war we start and people open there mouths like they know. we helped out ww1, ww2 and Vietnam. If you know anything in the gulf war we helped the republic of Kuwait when they were invaded by Iraq. of course we never won a war because the only on we ever started was with Afghanistan and Iraq. And on that note since the beginning of Afghan history, it has never been conquered.

  • @papiiuenvy186 the reason for my statement is because we in the west have this arrogance that we are superior to others in the world.Until we change our greed and attitude,we will be fighting for ever.

  • @rextuner03 Hey did you not get shot down enough already? Have you never heard of the Battle of Britain. Not much US help there and the Brits didn't lose the battle, in fact it saved them from Operation Sealion.

    So when are you going to tell everyone here how much you know Mr Retired Army Ranger/ Mr. World History minor. Your posts here are all BS also.

    Remember there are those of us who do study history watching for little children like you (or was all this your "step son". PoserCowardLoser

  • @MrMj88 The world needs more men like you my friend

  • @MrMj88 fk peace and ya the u.s cant win a war on their own but great britian sure showed them nazis in ww2 huh? ya like at dunkurk and market garden where the brits got ass raped by germany then the u.s had to come in to save your asses but dont worry next time we wont get involved we will let you badass brits take care of it

  • @1bigtarget great we have more american morons,so tell me this why is it when USA wants to go to war and(all americans say we and our allies...nato)we can destroy so on and on but never on their own.now go and learn when and why USA got involved in both wws but make sure when you are reading and learning it does not hurt your fragile brain thats if you do have one.

  • @MrMj88 lmao it doesn atter what you say without the u.s britian would have fell within months your fking country was on the brink of starvation learn some real history and stop reading propaganda

  • @1bigtarget what propaganda Usa has not been able to do anything on their ownits always usa and its allies.you and the rest of idiots like you live in this fantasy of being great but like i said its ok go back to sleep sweet dreams.

  • @MrMj88 sure just like you where there to help in korea and vietnam right ?and by the way idiot your an ally your suppoesed to help idiot and all this allied help in iraq and afhganistan is what maybe 2 or 3,000 allied troops that probably it the allys dont do anything all you do is send in a cuple of people to make it look like your helping thats it that is all you do and plz tell me how many wars has great britian won by themselvs in the past 100 years ?

  • @1bigtarget you realy are trying hard to sound intelligent (1)vietnam war we were not there but other allies were and what happend you lost that war and ran with your tail between your legs.(2)korean war we were there and the rest of US allies, hence USA and allies won.now show us where you did this on your own.now a little history lesson the reason USA entered both WWS was because they new if europe fell they would not be able to fight of germany and its allies.

  • @MrMj88 ok yes but you are still avoiding my question how many wars in the past 100 years has britian won by itself and yes the brits where in korea but not in any significant number and they got their asses handed to them so plz stop avoiding my questions and tell me how many wars has britian won in the past 100 years by itself and and no if urope fell the germans would still not have the capability to invade the u.s seeing as the u.s is thousands of miles away surrounded by huge oceans

  • @1bigtarget no offense man, but how many wars has the US won BY ITSELF? ww1 not by itself, ww2 not byitself, korea not by itself, vietnam war, they lost, gulf war, not by themselves, even current war in iraq was not by itself, even in the revolutionary war france helped the americans beat the british, only war the americans won by themselves was the spanish-american war, and i guess civil war hahaha

  • @tupacIzAlive33 What country out there has fought on there own with out one of the super powers helping them and financing there war machine. Vietnam we were not defeated by the Communist Army. After 20years we just declared victory and left. Every major Battle the communist lost..LBJ was no General, he was in there to make money..when was he dead in 1972.

  • @spacecop67 vietnam war was not a victory for the US retard, just because u win all the battles does not mean u win the war, the US's objectives were not to win battles, it was to topple the North Vietnamese and unify vietnam under teh South Vietnamese government, WHICH THEY FAILED TO DO, south vietnam fell to the north, casaualties do not determiine who wins the war, the north vietnamese objectives were to kick out the US forces and unify vietnam under their rule, which they did

  • @tupacIzAlive33 Fuck you ! you dont shit about Vietnam, your just terd in bag.You listen all that bullshit propaganda about why your country is so fucked and its Americas fault. I realy dont give fuck about Vietnam or afghanastan or fucking Iraq ..Saddam should use more gas,..We have stupid ideals about winning hearts and minds and all that bullshit..Nation Building, bunch lies..Kill each other ! drop the NUKE! get one ! when your all dead it will be quite again ! Peaceful! the birds can sing!

  • @tupacIzAlive33 Not another piece sewege! Are you VC? LBJ did not allow the US Military to win that war. Any way who gives a fuck now. The Vietnamese looking for the American Investments again.. G.I. you want BOOM BOOM? I get you BOOM BOOM>> IT goes full circle , what comes around goes around ! Its Ho CHI , Co CHE Ma MA got PUSSY CITY! SIAGON! I dont want to hear you say shit, get off my channel.

  • @tupacIzAlive33 it wasnt technicly a war it was a conflict congress has to declare war for there tobe a war

    second the viet kong lost 5 times what america lost

    but yes america lost the conflict because when people asked why americans were dieing in such large numbers and the answer was to stop somthing that doesnt effect them it didnt go over so well lol

  • @MrMj88 and almost every u.s citizen was armed to the teeth at that point in history the germans would have been whiped havent you learned a successfull invasion of the u.s is immpossable to many people will fight to many people have guns and are willing to die for this nation china and russia combined could not invade the u.s they would be bled dry of resources much like russia in afghanistan

  • @1bigtarget listen battle of britain the falklands war.now moron when i said from begining USA AND ITS ALLIES you and idiots like you say "NO WE DID IT ON OUR OWN"SO MORON NEXT TIME YOU WANT TO DEBATE DO A LITTLE RESEARCH SO YOU DON'T LOOK LIKE A IDIOT,but you lot just can not help it.

  • @MrMj88 wow yooe are really an idiot arnt you i said name a war and you say yhe battle of britian just to let you know the battle of britian was a battle not a war and after the battle of britian the british airforce was almost crippled and the falklands for real? not really a war more like an over night camping trip britian fighting in the falklands is like the u.s invading cuba not much of a war more like a pratcie run really so you need to learn some more history and the difference between

  • @MrMj88 war and battle then come back here and talk to me becuase you must not know what a war is lmao battle of britian to dam funny and like i said after the battle of britian the brit airforce was nearly crippled and the island was almost starved into surrender by german u boats if the u.s didnt step in you would have had no airforce no navy no food to ffed your civilians the germans would have taken britian within another year if the u.s didnt step in read some real history idiot

  • @1bigtarget i tell what why don't you and the rest of american idots start a lobby and tell you congress"as we believe we are the dog's bollocks in this world we don't need any allies to help us because we can do it on our own" then stand back and see how hard they will laugh and tell you to go jump.falkland was over quickly because we know how to fight.you lot not only fuck up,but kill your allies with frindly fires NOT EVERY THING THAT MOVES IS ENEMY MORON.

  • @MrMj88 oh ya yo won in tha falklands who are you going to attack next disney land ? and no the u.s does not need its allys becuase you dont do shit anyways how many brit soliders are in iraq ? how many in afghanistan ? how many where in korea how many where in vietnam now take all them british troops and add them up and its probably not even close to the number of u.s solider currently in afhganistan and every army suffers from frendly fire welcom to the world of warfare ff is a fact

  • @1bigtarget you keep dreaming that usa don't need any one.now go and start your lobby.it would be great for rest of the allies to back off and see how far you'll get.we are not the ones that ask for help in a war.don't brag that usa has so many troops in iraq and afghanestan and we can deal with them but since 2001 what have you achieved....nothing so stop embarrassing yourself .

  • @MrMj88 lmao then why is it that everysingle war the u.s allys have been involved in the u.s has taken the brunt of the fighting? and by the way didiot its called nato it is a treaty that some countrys sighned that the organization constitutes a system of collective defence whereby its member states agree to mutual defence in response to an attack by any external party.

  • @1bigtarget why is it that every single war the us taken the brunt of the fighting? because u have a short memory, ur memory is only 100 years old, what happened in world war 1? who took the brunt of fighting in ww1? french, german, british, russian, wut about ww2? brunt of fighting was british, german, russian, and in the end came americans, it is only after ww2 that the US became the superpower of the world that they take the brunt of the fighting, ww1 and ww2 us did not take brunt of fighting

  • @MrMj88 you are stupid in the last 100 how many british troops have been deployed to any war helping the u.s ?then ill tell you how many u.s soliders have been deployed just becuase the brits have 2000 soliders helping the u.s means what ? the truth is that your country has done notheing the u.s couldnt have done the world has no idea what the u.s is capable of doing becuase we have not had to use our actuall strength in the past 60 years just small amounts of strength to fight tiny wars

  • @1bigtarget the stupid one is you.the only way usa can win is to drop nuclear bombs or incinerate bombs on people,the day will come when the world will turn on usa for commiting genocide.go find out why in us constitution they would go to war and will not allow usa and us citizens be proscuted for any war crimes.

  • @MrMj88 are you completly stupid ? solides get prsecuted for war crimes all the times idiot and ya the only way the u.s can win is by dropping nukes ok dude we dint drop nukes on the germmans we didnt drop nukes on the vietnamese we didnt drop nukes in korea we didnt drop nukes in the gulf war and we didnt drop nukes in iraqi freedom you are truyl and idiot

  • @1bigtarget how about incinerate bombs,you yanks are warmongers and don't see it as wrong to invade countries for your own profit,but if it makes you feel beter to call me and those who question the way usa persecutes the weaker countries that don't do as usa says you go ahead and do that,you are just another american who thinks this planet belongs to them.

  • @1bigtarget how about incinerate bombs and the treatment of iraqi prisoners,you yanks are warmongers and don't see it as wrong to invade countries for your own profit,but if it makes you feel better to call me and those who question the way usa persecutes the weaker countries that don't do as usa says you go ahead and do that,you are just another american who thinks this planet belongs to them.

  • @MrMj88 yes yor right we wnt into iraq for profite right ? then how come we spend more than we make over there ? why do we spend billions and billions of dollars over there with almost no return buy ya its for our profit you are an idiot and the u.s dont use incernerary bombs they are outlawed by the ganeva convention idiot atleast try to learn what you claim to know

  • @1bigtarget so is torturing moron but usa is doing itlike i said if you get your head out of your arse and realy look at what has been going on.if usa did not go to iraq for profit moron and they went in to give iraqies freedom,why has usa not gone in to zimbabwe.Oh iknow because there aren't any profit there.but hey idots like you bury their head in sand

  • @MrMj88 are your really this fking stupid ? did your parents feed you lead paint chips as a kid ? ya the u.s is makeing huge profits off of iraq we are makeing such huge profits we are 14trillion fking dollars in debt you fking idiot if we where makeing profites we would be in a much better standing finacial situation but are we ? we throw billions of fking dollars at iraq and afghanistan and get nothing in return you are fking stupid show me the proof prove to me these profits are real

  • @MrMj88 you cant becuase you are full of shit where the fk is the proof you stupid sack of shit at least one peace of credable proof ? have anything no you dont ya what about our allies you say we cant do anything without our allies where if britians huge profits ?? where te fk are they and plz explain to me how we are makeing money by throwing billions into this war ploz prove me wrong show me proof if not then shut your fucking mouth

  • @1bigtarget did touch a nerve?what about zimbabwe moron.they say truth hurts don't get your panties in a twist.yanks just can't deal with the truth.hush,hush dick head you gona burst a blood vessel.no answer for zimbabwe,ask your parents if they filled your brain full of shit because thats whats comming out of your mouth.

  • @MrMj88 what about britian they have a bunch of muslim terrorist ?how about we invade great britian ? what about britian what the hell has your country done to help stop terrorism ? we cant fight the whole world idiot there are alot of countries the have have terrorsit we cant invade them all and why dont you answer my question where is the proof you have showed none your full of shit show me the proof of shut the fuck up

  • @1bigtarget look up"WikiLeaks To Publish Iraq War Files Documents Details Torture And War Crimes"you are 19 yr old kid put your video game down and do some research,you have either been sleepor in a coma or were not on this planet dick head.

  • @MrMj88 just as i thoght no proof about profits in iraq and afghanistan ??? im waiting feel free to send me your link of proom in a pm

  • @1bigtarget iraq is kind of a long-term investment, it is true in the beginning they had to spend money, but for the US it was worth it to get rid of a dictator they didnt like, u obvioulsy cant get rid of dictator for free, however, in the long-term, the US will gain money from the War in Iraq, because the new iraq now buys american weapons and lets the US have military bases in their country, already Iraqi army has placed order for over 1,000 m1at abrams tanks, there will be more to come

  • @1bigtarget ur logic makes no sense, u are lucky the UK and other countries even send 1 soldier to help the US, if the UK or France invaded sum african country tomorrow how many US soldiers would help them? why should other countries send soldiers to fight in a war that the US is starting, it makes no sense, it is true they are allies, but being an ally does not mean u unconditionally send troops to fight anybody

  • @tupacIzAlive33 its called a collective defense the u.k help u.s in afracistane becuase the u.k is also under threat from terrorrist so helping hte u.s is helping the u.k

  • @MrMj88 Hey fuck tard if it wasnt for the US britian would have been dry of resorces and you would have never existed b/c german would have fucked you in the ass. Lend and lease act stupid shit which it allowed the sale of arms and arment to our allies. So think one more time before blame the US for your own personal problem.

  • @1bigtarget sorry man i usually odnt respond like this, but almost every single post u have posted is 100% wrong, jus to let u know there are currently over 40,000 international troops in afghanistan, fighting alongside the 150,000 americans, so what is this u are saying about allied help being 2,000??

  • @tupacIzAlive33 in case you did notice i was being sarcastice 40,000 oh wow big deal huh?

  • @1bigtarget yeah 40,000 is a big deal retard, the U.S. had 150,000 and ISAF contributed 40,000 thats 30% of the force stupid add, the europeans have no reason to send hundreds of thousand of troops, the U.S. is lucky they even sent one. They play a supporting role retard, when the U.S. starts a war they arent gonna sent as many as the US they jus send enough to support their ally

  • @MrMj88 you gave no proof in your rambling that the U.S. could never win a war on their own. I know for sure you're English, only the English are so swollen headed as to proclaim something so stupid. Well last I checked the I.R.A. are still operational, meaning you've been fighting the Irish for ohhh what 800 years or so? If you want to talk about a weak military, take a look at your own you dunce.

  • @temperex I don't need to give proof because in your short history from the time USA got its independace (with the help of the French) up to now USA has always needed help so please stop lying to yourself.and I have not said that we have won every conflict.

  • @MrMj88 Your British? wait tell Iran has Missile that can reach London O boy! it will be like WW2 again for you. V-2 rocket again by one of Hitlers Friends..

  • @spacecop67 yes british and very proud of it.If your country and mine stayed out of their affairs and not stick our noses in theirs for our benefits we would not have to worry about them trying to bomb us.Tell me if some one entered your house and looted your bank account raped your family would you sit back and say"hey thats ok"or would you retaliate?and you would not hurt that person if they stayed away from you and did not inflict any pain or sorrow to you.

  • @MrMj88 America is not the reason why Iran is in the state it is. They are there worst enemy.Radicals that control there country are going to push them into war. There Video on Iranian women and men dancing and they seem like happy middle class people.The young and the intellegent will prosper but the old radical clereks and there followers are going to blame Isreal and America for there problems.Problems are in there hands and it isant America or Britain thats keeping them down its themselfs.

  • @spacecop67 yes they didn't wakeup one day and said to themselves "WE KNOW WE ARE GOING TO GO TO WAR WITH USA AND UK,HENCE THE QUESTION,IF SOMEONE ENTERD YOUR HOME?This the problem we have in the west,we interfere for our benefit and when they retaliate,we say"HOW DARE THEY,ITS THEIR OWN FAULT".We need to get off of this mighty horse that we are better we can do what we like attdtiude without reprisal.

  • @MrMj88 Yea I guess your right ! We did fuck them in the Ass!

  • @spacecop67 like you said to tupacIzAlive33 "what comes around goes around.one good/bad deed deserve another.that is why i say "we can not interfere for our benefit and not expect them to retaliate.

  • Comment removed

  • @spacecop67 Mohammad Mosaddegh (19 May 1882 – 5 March 1967) was the democratically elected[Prime Minister of Iran from 1951 to 1953 when he was overthrown in a coup d'état backed by the United States Central Intelligence Agency.

  • @spacecop67 He is most famous as the architect of the nationalization of the Iranian oil industry, which had been under British control since 1913 through the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC) (later British Petroleum or BP). The Anglo-Iranian Oil Co. was controlled by the British government.

  • @spacecop67 Mosaddegh was removed from power in a coup on 19 August 1953, organised and carried out by the United States CIA at the request of the British MI6 which chose Iranian General Fazlollah Zahedi to succeed Mosaddegh.[7] The CIA called the coup Operation Ajax[8] after its CIA cryptonym, and as the 28 Mordad 1332 coup in Iran, after its date on the Iranian calendar.[9] Mosaddegh was imprisoned for three years, then put under house arrest until his death.

  • although irans military powers may not be as advance as nations with long history of naval and ground warfare, they have put the outcome of the last war to good use. this is the begining of a new era. iran is very dangrous because they are setting an example for the 3rd world by stepping toward independence and self reliance. however this does not justify the harsh treatment of citizens and dictatorship..

  • Wow i clicked on this for no reasone.

    I rather not get into your BS politcal battle's.

    But ill say this.

    I see alot stubid out thier.. The one's defedning iran of course.

    Oh and also war is war.... So stop bitching about civilan deaths... last time i check the western nations are the only ones useing.

    Look befor you shoot.

    and the only ones trying not to kill civilans.

    cant say much for iran.russia,china,korea,etc.

    Dum kids.

  • If the US used nukes they couldn't set up to get at Iran's oil which is one of the reasons they want to take Iran just like Iraq. Google "a clean break securing the realm" to read the pentagon report sent to Israel around 1996. Saddam wasn't limiting oil production like OPEC wanted either and started trading in Euros and the Bush family has strong ties with OPEC financially.Taliban couldn't secure the pipelines either.Russian Vacuum bomb is much more efficient than nukes too no 75yr wasteland

  • Iran must get nuclear weapon to become immune to any attack from the devilish barbaric pink 'white" race.

    that race of terror is the devil. it attack based on race.

    islamic revolution is the answer to these demons that are not ashamed to call themselves white

  • @DefenderOFAfrica

    You got no idea how powerful the US really is if it wants to be.

    1 Ohio class sub 24 nuclear ballistic missiles with 8 nuclear warheads each 50 times more powerful then the bombs dropped on Hiroshima.

    196 Nuclear weapons per sub and can't be detected when fired underwater. Nuclear weapons give Iran no immunity from attack. The US could just place 14 Ohio subs near Iran. Iran launches a single nuke US fires 2,744 nukes in under 5 minutes.

  • you are a real comedian, do you think we do not follow the USA behavior? why with North Korea the USA has removed the option of military strike or invasion against North Korea?

    before North got nuclear weapon they spoke of invasion and military strike, now their languages of changed.

    any nuclear armed nation can build the same type of nuclear weapon the USA have and burn it down with one strike

  • Its clear you no nothing about war what so ever. 1st North Korean nukes is limited to under 10 nukes and they are 1250 times weaker in yeild the the USA strongest weapons. They only got Atomic weapons not thermonuclear. Oh and BTW they havent removed the option. Oh and to destroy the US in 1 strike u need 800 nukes with 1 megatone in yeild greater and thats only the major cities and only Russia can do that.

  • Btw 1 Ohio submarine carrys the same amount of weapons as all of chinas nuclear arsenal and its 4 times stronger in yeild. You can't do anything.

    Also Iran is weak. Couldn't break through Iraq lines after 8 years and US managed to destroy the whole Iraq military infrastructure with just air strikes and by the time the land forces came in they surrendered without a fight

  • Your propaganda is weak. The time the USA invaded IRAQ, the army there was not as strong as it was the time of the IRan iRAQ war. by the time of the USA invasion IRAQ had endured years of sanction, it military was hurt with the previous gold wars the USA waged and they never managed to renew their army.

    and on top of that Iran military is 2000% stronger than it was during the IRAN IRAQ war. the time of that war the islamic revolution was just newly eastablished,

    u really can dream

  • U got no Idea Its not propoganda its fact. US aircraft carriers without losing a single plane destroyed over 2000 Iraqi tanks. US airforce is 300 times the size of the Iran air force. Did you also know the Iran air force 50% of its aircraft is US made prior 1979 and is way outdated.

    Irans navy it also a laugh. That use speed boats. By tonnage the Iran Navy is only half a percent the weight of the US navy combined.

  • (Con't) an excuse to start an attack against Iran. Fallon refused because he knew that if in fact Iran's coastal defenses took action, the damage to the US naval fleet in the gulf would be catastrophic with a horrendous loss of human lives. Fallon also objected because it's morally wrong to attack Iran, and he resigned. He refused to act as a "chest piece" for Washington's elite. He is a man with a conscious who knows that one day, he will have to answer to a Higher Power.

  • Put it this way.If for some reason Iran developed nuclear weapons and attacked Israel then the US could just use Ohio submarines and destroy Iran just like that.

  • That's if Iran had the intention of attacking Israel militarily, which it doesn't. The Iranians are just not happy with the Israeli leadership, not the Jewish or Israeli people for that matter. Most people don't realize that there are over 25,000 Jews living in Iran who go to school, have jobs, own homes, cars, and even have representation in Iran's parliament, so out the window goes the notion that Iran is anti Semitic. The US is the one that needs to be careful about launching a nuke there.

  • Iran cant do crap seriously what can iran do against Ohio subs. 24 missiles each with 8 nukes. Speed 9.6 kms per sec. From the Gulf Iran will be wiped out in under 5 minutes. Nothing you can do against the US

  • Your mind watch much of those hollywood movies.

    with the much weaker taliban the USA is now asking for negociation because it is unable to win.

    in Iraq to bring the death of USA soldiers from 100 every month to a small number the USA had to bribe some people who then help cool the situation.

    so what are u talking about?

    if USA military asset could win, then there would be no need to negociate with the Taliban.

    why are they begging the taliban to join in the peace proess now?

  • If the US didnt care about civilians the war would be over a long time ago. If they did what germany did and killed civilians in mass numbers like the Germans the war would be over long ago.

  • I dont watch hollywood movies for your information and stop dodgingthe facts. The US beat Iraq in 2003 in 3 weeks with very little fighting. Took 2 Weeks to Capture all the major cities in Afghanistan.

    If you knew about war then you would know the US actually did win and now its an occupying force.

    Saying they are losing means no country in history has succesfully invaded another country.

  • In world war 2Germany defeated the the militaries of surrounding countries and occupied them. they faced resistance also. So did the Soviet Union and there death tolls of there occupying forces were much greater.

    Later though they all resistance stopped once germany had no regard to civilian life.

    Iraq faced kurish resistance for decades and once they had no regard for civilians and used chemical weapons against the Kurds resistance stopped.

  • You are still shameless in your logic, if an occupying country cannot establish security in the occupied country because of hostile activities from the enemy, it mean the war is not over.

    When the occupying army still looses 100 soldiers every month due to hostile actions it means the war is not over.

    If the occupying army is begging for negociation it mean they didn't win.

    The USA is going through all the above, so which victory you are talking about?