Jeremy Roenick shootout goal
0:37
Added: 5 years ago
From: tommygrenierbeland
Views: 39,043
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (94)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!

  • weird seeing JR in a kings jersey

    intoodeep941 1 year ago

  • shouldnt be a goal. he took 2 whacks at it

    herzdk42 1 year ago

  • Ugliest. Goal. Ever

    WakeTheDead300 1 year ago

  • rebound and really he hit vokoun so far into the net does that realy count if it wasn't a rebond

    bobfrickensaget 1 year ago

  • @bobfrickensaget you do know what a hit is right? a goalie ( i am one) backing himself into the net is not a hit. just saying.

    johnkerry7 1 year ago

  • it was obsiviously a Rebound shot, doesn't count as a goal.

    SpedeX016 2 years ago

  • no goal it was a rebound

    Icedoggy924 2 years ago 2

  • That was no goal

    kgam1596 2 years ago

  • i would say no goal.

    Pyyleva 2 years ago

  • o woah then

    sabresoilers88 2 years ago

  • did the refs say it was a goal?

    sabresoilers88 2 years ago

  • Yes

    jeanjones9154 2 years ago

  • notice how it's the LA commentators saying that it shouldn't count, the best and most unbiased announcing in the league...some teams' (Buffalo and Edmonton spring to mind) are a joke!

    mangahead21 2 years ago

  • PITTSBURGH has the most biased commentators in the league.

    Hockeyevan9992 2 years ago 3

  • My two favorite teams. I love the commentary; yeah it's biased, but I'd rather have people who cheer for my team commentating than, some asshole like Bob Cole who only cares about the leafs and commentates other games.

    evenplay1 2 years ago

  • goal if u watch closley he oviously doesnt shoot on a rebound! AVALANCHE RULE

    evangelista7biteme 3 years ago

  • Wasn't a goal, total rebound or two swings.

    In other news: NASHVILLE SUCKS!Still sucks and will continue to suck.I love when my Sharks play them in the playoffs, getting passed round 1 is the easy then.lol

    Moviebro 3 years ago

  • No goal, sorry!

    amk2001 3 years ago

  • the answer is: IT'S NASHVILLE VS. L.A. - WHO GIVES A FUCK.

    EvX03 3 years ago 21

  • You're right. XD

    tommygrenierbeland 3 years ago

  • then y watch the fuckin video then dipshit?????

    NashPreds39 3 years ago

  • cause JR is the fans favorite player and should be placed into the NHL hall of fame the minute he retires

    mclovintheflyers 3 years ago

  • never said i didnt like jr, just cause fans love him doesnt mean this goal should count

    NashPreds39 3 years ago

  • lol i know, it was not a goal... but its the reason ppl are watching this

    mclovintheflyers 3 years ago

  • oh ok lol, i was sayin that to the guy that said la and nashville suck. i do like JR tho, he is good for hockey.

    NashPreds39 3 years ago

  • dat wasn't a goal dumbass

    Ovechkin8rulz 3 years ago

  • sure as hell NO GOAL!!

    predsfan08 3 years ago

  • Two Reasons it's no goal

    1. Goalie interference

    2. Rebound off the first shot

    dyskietka71 3 years ago 14

  • yeah i never even paid attention to him interfering that badly

    NashPreds39 3 years ago

  • @dyskietka71 it is a rebound but its not goalie interference because he didnt do it on purpose, and the puck went into the crease before he did. im a goalie, at times i make a big save and someone crashes into me. the puck is already in the crease and they put into the net while im down. it sucks but its a goal.

    SoFluffy17 6 months ago

  • no goal clearly a rebound and thats y today we have video replay

    zms333 3 years ago

  • oh man so unlucky

    aliandtroy 3 years ago

  • thats a rebound, no goal.

    gbrockriede 3 years ago 3

  • NO GOAL

    but i saw this game and the reff had counted it

    xHeelsOverHeadx 3 years ago

  • NO GOAL

    but i saw this game and the reff had counted it

    xHeelsOverHeadx 3 years ago

  • I agree with the Comentators

    Auldyguy 3 years ago

  • I was at this game and can remember it being in the late afternoon. I am a Kings fan. The goal did count and the Kings won. Unfortunately the officials got it wrong. That should not have been a goal and the Kings should never have traded for Roenick...:)

    westcoastoutpost 3 years ago

  • His momentum carried the puck in don't swear at me or any thing..... goal

    ferrettunes 3 years ago

  • no goal, he hit it twice.. they reviewed it AND allowed it saying his momentum carried the puck which was complete bs. no goal

    predsvokoun29 4 years ago

  • Not even close - no goal

    forkhead 4 years ago 2

  • No goal.

    Hamburgler55 4 years ago 3

  • No goal.

    PackinCash 4 years ago 2

  • i agree. no goal..

    jamieleexo 4 years ago 2

  • you are a dumbass

    jproducts 4 years ago 3

  • yah i second this.

    hockeyavalanche73 4 years ago

  • just a thing to put out there, my bro thought of it after his shootout goal was disallowed in hockey

    TheCaniac 4 years ago

  • haha youre stupid bro thats the dumbest thing ive ever heard

    NashPreds39 3 years ago

  • Its no goal because of a rebound but good try Jeremy.

    NHLFan019 4 years ago

  • goal

    LeafsTelevision 4 years ago

  • ? it was a rebound that's no goal automatically

    jproducts 4 years ago 2

  • NO GOAL he took a second shot NO GOAL

    PolishKiller62 4 years ago

  • Oh really?

    Walaument 4 years ago

  • rebound... nice move though if it went in

    zeppieri88 4 years ago

  • It's a rebound for sure!No Goal!

    Moviebro 4 years ago

  • NO GOAL!!!

    XTCorolla 4 years ago

  • save

    nicdesk 4 years ago

  • NO GOAL!!!! SAVED left pad

    eastbovis 4 years ago

  • it looks like it just tapped his stick and went in, i dont think he meant to shoot twice

    Boogaardfan24 4 years ago

  • what did the reffs call it ?

    brendan427 4 years ago

  • no goal

    shanman14 4 years ago

  • it was a 2nd attempt...

    supershadowflame 4 years ago

  • NO GOAL> REBOUND

    jasjacks77 4 years ago

  • holy shit i think we established that it wasnt a goal

    nicky478 4 years ago

  • SAVE

    Blazeuptheheat 4 years ago

  • that was nice but wwyd he screw it up at the end w/ the rebound

    hockeykid91 4 years ago

  • He took 3 shots, not 2.

    jkc3954 4 years ago

  • Scratch that, 2. lol

    jkc3954 4 years ago

  • you guys we get it here in three words i can say the same thing as all of you-REBOUND NO GOAL

    hockeylad99 5 years ago

  • I'll say the same now as I did when I watched this happen on NHL Centre Ice. SAVE BY VOKOUN. If you extrapolate the angle and speed of the puck before JR's stick touches it again, it will sail wide of the left post.

    Hiei2k7 5 years ago

  • its rebound. just watch. its against rules to come in contact with the puckafter shooting. he hits it twice

    aaron37942 5 years ago

  • no goal.. rebouundddd

    anaheimducks4life 5 years ago

  • Obviously no goal. The puck was goingwide before it hit his stick

    sizzleby 5 years ago

  • no goal. as per shootout rules, you only get to shoot once. there is a distinct motion made with his stick on the second effort. if he had let it slide in on its own, it might have been legit. and that's ignoring his right legs is kicking the goalie's left leg into the net opening up what was otherwise a sealed off left post. Goalies to push themselves back into the net with that much momentum.

    n8n8n8 5 years ago

  • Rebooound

    jkjkjk123456789 5 years ago

  • Actually theres a big scheme going on in the NHL to piss off the Nucks so much that they just quit. Afterall no one wanted to invite them to the party anywyas! I say sell vancouver and bring back the Hartford Whalers baby! wooooo!!

    p.s. Toronto pwns

    drawXbackXtheXhammer 5 years ago

  • Those goal judges in Toronto are blind. They call the goal against Vancouver when a Minnisota player kicked it in but called off the goal when Vancouver's Markus Naslund unknowingly kicked the goal in. These guys are jokes!

    asdfqwer12345678 5 years ago

  • Well, if it was anyone else, I'd definitely say "no goal" but I have absolutely NO objectivity where JR is concerned. He may score those on my watch anytime! hahaha

    andrea2292 5 years ago

  • No goal, I'm agree with goflamesgo123

    GtfOnerd 5 years ago

  • well its a goal

    melshow 5 years ago

  • no way that's a goal

    WilleTsukka 5 years ago

  • It was a rebound! When you see closely, for a second it goes off the pad and then Roenick's stick hit it in the net!

    KirshSritharan 5 years ago

  • No goal, rebound.

    IhmeUkko 5 years ago

  • clearly not a goal

    icehockeyfan22 5 years ago

  • No goal it was a rebound

    DetIzRed 5 years ago

  • clearly that wasn't a goal...I hope those video goal judges were fired after that.

    okk 5 years ago

  • I watched this game live and even the commentators were saying it wasnt a goal and the officials got it wrong

    lordofthedeke 5 years ago

  • this is no goal, if u look VERY VERY closely, on the final replay in this video, when roenick shoots the puck and it looks like it went under the pad, it chages direction just by maybe 5 or 6 degrees so that means it obviously hit somthing on the way in. another way to see that it was no goal is that when roenick shot it the first time it was going "southeast", (easier way to put it) and when it comes from under the pad it was going "southwest". so it shouldnt have been a goal.

    goflamesgo123 5 years ago

  • i went back to look at the results of that game in sportsnet and it said they counted it, so LA won that game.

    darkdragonzx 5 years ago

  • no goal What was the final decision?

    ollie7777 5 years ago

  • no it was a goal...video review did not at the time have the power to rule it was scored on the rebound

    hrdkorehockeyfrk 5 years ago

  • yes they did turn your volume up and u can hear them say its under review i watched this game..they reviewed and allowed it and once again, along with the other repeated words it shouldnt have counted...

    predsvokoun29 4 years ago

  • goal

    miseboy 5 years ago

  • no goal

    budshonda 5 years ago

  • it hit the goalie, bounced back, then he hit it again. no goal

    FilipiNoBro 5 years ago

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more