Added: 4 years ago
From: SteinbergSoftware
Views: 147,937
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (33)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • lol windows 98...

  • Guys...I use Wavelab. Nothing complicated at ALL about it...it's GREAT!!

  • how much does it cost>?????

  • @jjorge999 200$ PLUS PLUG INS WHICH COST TEN TIME THIS PRIICE....

  • Ok when i downloaded this it didnt come with all these things i see here

  • can you remove sound channels in songs with this?

    i mean if you can remove instrument sounds?

    i need to have somethin that can do that

  • @vinnie049049 You need the multitrack sessions to do that.. There's not really any technology capable of doing that properly yet, I think Stienberg are potentially going to release something like that, or they're researching it.

    You can't just take a song and extract the guitars, not possible once all the waves are blended in to make the final song wave, sorry dude.

  • @vinnie049049 That's impossible

  • Wavelab can indeed be used to record audio :) you would be better recording using a usb or firwire audio interface for a cleaner sound....

  • do u record in wavelab or u jus upload wave files into it?

  • just uplad audio mixdown into it

  • No you do not record in Wave lab.... Wave lab is used to manipulate wave files

  • you can record using wavelab too. using your input audio.

  • it may have the more features than adobe audition but, DOES IT ALLOW ACAPELLA/ VOCAL EXTRACTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • i do not think any software can accurately extract vocals, as it depends on a number things how it was recorded and mixed e.t.c

    it's best to use a filter and extract vocals manually in my opinion

  • No....and when you find a program that does let me know lol..

  • you are dumb, who cares about vocal extraction? wavelab is professional mastering software and adobe audition is an amateur DAW. nothing wrong with AA, but you cannot compare the two, they are completely different in what they do.

  • maybe not because extracting acapella's and vocals will always sound like crap

  • This thing still uses Delphi's default icons. Maybe it is time to switch the development platform.

  • I have this program ,

    Its very complicated to operate,

  • It seems complicated... Thanks for the warning

  • get waves mercury bundle wavelab is wack lol

  • I hope they make a Mac version

  • very good video

  • Finally, they put some vids on YT.

    I hope they'll do some 'how-to' tutorials and cover some advanced features.

    Come on Steinberg, by doing this you'll be able to:

    1. Satisfy and sometimes ensure future customers.

    2. Demystify claims of extreme high learning curve.

    A profile designed exclusively for wavelab use is recommended.

  • HI Charles,

    i've used most of the famous mixing and mastering software ,they sound great on my home system but when i post my song on youtube or myspace i'm extremely disappointed.

    How do you explain that?

  • on youtube you have to carefull with phase corelation (mono/stereo compatibility) as for myspace their player tents to add more bass

  • It degrades your sound to save bandwidth also, so it's destined to sound low fidelity.

    On Topic: Wavelab is still the champ for mastering and editing on native systems. Good job Steinberg! Now if only you'd port Wavelab to Mac, so that I don't need to go to and fro PC to Mac (Currently avoiding Bootcamp). Otherwise Bias may have my monies sooner or later. v5 and v6 still does it better than Bias IMHO though, ATM.

  • is there something which you are using on MAC which you can't use inside windows?

  • pro logic, the ultimate producing software

    :P in my opinion

  • I agree.

  • ill take 3

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more