Added: 5 years ago
From: buster1rock2
Views: 20,346
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (51)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • born here raised here & i still say fuck mustang there a fuckin rip off ford sucks.

  • hahahah smoked

  • @jerryatrix9 by who?

  • Mach 1's put down more power while driving than on the dyno.. simply because of the shaker hood,, its not getting any air on the dyno but on the freeway MORE AIR=MORE POWER!!!

  • @marquis781 thats true for practically every car

  • @marquis781

    The shaker hood on the Mach1 is cosmetic only, it's NOT functional from the factory.

    Watch:

    /watch?v=jafHpglAqeA (1:14 for under hood shot where air intake coils down)

  • @thetravdawg Shut your stupid mouth, WTF do you know about mach1s??? The stock shaker on a mach1 IS in fact fully functional.

  • @blown06tc

    Really? Why does it route to an air box instead of directly into the intake like a true shaker hood does? Check out the engine bay junior where it coils into the AIR BOX and not directly into the intake.

    Read up my friend, Ford literature states it's partially functional.

  • @thetravdawg Junior? I own a Mach1 you queer bait so I know exactly where it goes. Its shoes you know nothing since you can't even answer your own question. The shaker hoods used in older cars went directly to the carburator, new cars dont use carbs now do they?? So its gotta go thru a filter then into the motor.

  • @blown06tc

    Yeah junior because that's how you act/talk. Like a little punk kid. Really? "queer bait"? Hahaha whatever. "Its shoes"? You probably tried to say "it shows" and the question was for you because I know what a "fully functional" shaker hood is.

    If it was a fully functioning shaker hood it would ram air directly into the air box and then through the throttle body into the intake manifold but it doesn't. Instead it away to an air box and then finally finds the throttle body.

  • @thetravdawg So in your words......actually there is no point in your post, you're just being ignorant all because the mach1 system is channeled away from the motor instead of directly to it. Thats no valid point and just because of its design doesnt give you any right to call it a fake system. The system was redesigned to work on modern day intake systems. All that you're stating is your opinion and nothing more, sorry if it doesn't meet YOUR standards but it doesn't mean you're right.

  • @blown06tc

    In my words it's not fully functional, I take back where I said it was "cosmetic only." A true shaker hood drives air DIRECTLY in to the throttle body via the air box, not indirectly. Everywhere official where the "shaker" hood on the Mach 1 is described there are quotations around "shaker" which indicates it is a throw back to the original but not a true shaker hood.

    You can stomp your feet all you want as a Mach 1 owner but that doesn't make you right either.

  • @thetravdawg You make no sense, the air goes directly to the air box it just driving you crazy that the air makes a u-turn and down to a modern air box, bottom line is that it goes directly there and not for some other auxiliary purpose, it just feeds the intake. Quit being a soreass about the subject, some LS motors have ram air you dont see me saying its a fake ram air just because in midway thru the hood and makes a u-turn and then into the air box, thats the way GM designed it and thats it.

  • @blown06tc

    Thanks for further illustrating my point, "it makes a u-turn" which indicates it's a round-a-bout rather than a direct or "ram" intake.

    You're wrong about the LS ram air by the away my '99 SS air flow goes from hood scoop to air box and to the throttle body (there's an engine bay shot in my videos). It's all one direct path. The LT1 Z28/Trans Am had the elbow from an air box into the throttle body but the '96 SS and Firehawk/WS6 have the same ram air set up as my car.

  • @thetravdawg Its the design, why cant you understand? Its meant to get water out of the air and drain it. Dont BS me about LS1, I've seen plenty of ls1 motors to know how it works, the ram air inlet on your car is half way up your hood yet your intake filter is up front on top of the radiator, how exactly do you thing the air flow makes it to the filter without changing direction? My buddys LS1 GTO with an LS2 hood with ram air works the same way, air has to turn forward to make it to the filter

  • Man im starting to change my mind about getting a eclipse now :(

  • eclipse have good accel

  • MIVEC high tech performance engine vs mach1 tractor trash technology engine

  • tractor trash technology and still MURDERED the eclipse.

  • but still tractor trash,,,,~!!!probably used whole tank of gas to do tat LOL

  • Funny you say that because that V6 is only rated at 1 or 2 MPG better, horrible if you ask me. BTW, no mustang owner drives it for economy, thats what corollas and camrys are for, but if thats the best excuse you guys can come up with..you fail!!!

  • LOL shit,,,listen boy,, i don't give a shit about MPG i don't belive that shit,, i am talking about 4.8L v8 engine only gives u 260somehing horsepower,, i4 s2k still can walk that piece of rustang gt,,,

    mustang uses lot of gas,,

    import uses less gas to provide exact power ,,lol

  • and i used to have mustangs,,,, for 5yrs,, i know all about tat shit,, lots of piece shit interior,, ""power is ok but not tat impressive for the gas"" i beat tha shit out of mustang before i sell to dealer,, lol now i love my car rite now,, it's high tech japanese motor,, with turbo,, ^^

  • How funny you call me a boy but we're the exact same age???What a cocksucker you are. It doesn't sound like you owned a mustang because you dont seem to know anything about them. Its a 4.6L and its not a GT it a Mach1 which is a totally different motor and its rated at 310hp not 260. BTW, you say that you don't care about MPG but yet you keep mentioning it over and over and over, give it up and stop giving excuses. I would like to see an stock s2k walk a stock Mach, LMAO!

  • 2003-2004 Mach 1 is underrated at 305 HP..

    But it can actually pump to 320HP stock..

  • 03s were rated at 305 and 04s were rated at 310, but yes they do put down closer to 320.

  • @blown06tc had an 05 S2000, mach ones are pussys, i beat an 03 saleen too

  • @eclipsefreak21 Mach1 for pussies? Dare I ask what s2000s are for? LMAO!! Please I've embarrassed plenty of S2Ks.

  • @blown06tc S2000s are made for the track, not straight lines. Take your mach 1 against any S on a REAL track and see how bad your mach 1 really looks

  • @eclipsefreak21 LMAO! I can take the corners with ease if need be and still blow by it on the straights.

  • Well, even tho the Eclipse is still labled as import, it is made in America now. I belive mine says it was made in Illanois

  • the eclipse won due to it 33 second time bracket right?

  • BushidothePhenom im with you all the way i love both imports

    and muscle cars. i never favored one or the other.

  • The Mach 1 won earlier then that lol, you can see it ahead all the way!

  • what did you run in the 1/4 mile? I have an 06 cai/greddy A-b and I eat those ponies all day long.....and they have eight cylinders....lol American automotive tech is crap...pound for pound cubic inch for cubic inch american muscle cars are dead.....if you think im full of crap race a stang or even a vette against a mitsu evo/lancer ....dont worry its just a 4 banger..back to the drawing board rednecks

  • I respect the fact that you prefer imports over muscle but to completely trash talk muscle is just foolish. I have one of each, a 3K and a GT Mustang and I love both equally. Just love all cars!!! Why choose one over the other? You don't know what your missing!!!

  • OoOOokKkk

  • You're an idiot. Race my LS1 and that old school pushorod motor will RAPE.. and I mean RAPE that show ass eclipse.

  • Agreed. My friend has a '99 T/A LS1 6 speed with SLP lid, tune, LT headers, full exhaust with no cats and it hauls. My bolt-on '82 Mustang 5.0 can kinda hang till about 70 mph then he walks. And i've beaten the new Eclipse GTs.

  • Yea that's a dumb thing to say. Every car, driver, and circumstance is different. I've seen one car kill another in person, then seen the same two cars race online and the result was exactly opposite. Every person with a fast import thinks American cars suck when they (you) haven't even driven any. Drive a stock 1998-2002 LS1 Camaro or Trans Am with a 6 speed and then tell me it was crap. Plus, they'd kill you. My bolt-on 150,000 mile 1982 5.0 Mustang beats the new Eclipse GT

  • yeah bro i go there once and a while. i have a video of me against a foxbody. i kicked that ass lol

  • because it was probably a 4-clyinder fox body

  • is that raceway park in english town nj

  • yes this was from last year at englishtown on a friday night

  • whats the eclipse is it a gt

  • its an 06 gt

  • Nice! check out my Eclipse out

  • wow thats pretty good on the eclipse's part! Is the clipse modded?

  • just a cold air

  • @importfighter How do you figure if no times were showed?

  • who won?

  • the mach won at the very end

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more