sorry but this just bullshit. "dark matter" is just a media-friendly "sexy" term for actually the failure of astrophysicists to explain most of the galaxy movement in the universe.
@Skandalos Erm, no. Dark matter is used amongst astrophysicists. The media has nothing to do with it. You, sir, are talking out of your ass. Typical "I don't understand it so it's bullshit" logic. Congrats, you fail at science.
Why do the religious types post on these videos. If they were secure and believed what ever they do then they have nothing to worry about. Posting about god only show some insecurities, And its proof that they watch and search for this stuff.
I dont know if what they say is real, Seems something new is always being thought of. Its great for the mind though.
Mmm.. The Bible was written 2000 y ago..intresting how many things that was fortell, is coming true....you will work., have kids, earthquakes, mark of the beast 666..Isreal wil became a nasion,rebuild of Solomon's temple..nasion against nasion..ect..ect..ect..to much to mention..God is looking after his Creation!!..What they miss is ..God!
@rems. Its nice to the American Christians are still as mentally challenged as ever. I don't mind religious people, they can believe the lies and bullshit written in the child's book that is the bible as much as they want but when they come on the internet trolling and commenting on subjects that they cannot understand it annoys me. The information is there that explains it all, but the majority of it can only be explained using complex maths, and because you cannot understand it you dismiss it.
@ JolleyEFC: The whole idea is the pinnacle of non-scientific physics. The burden isn't on me, its up to the people who make such hillarious claims to produce evidence. So, I suggest until you show me a sample, you don't invoke the "e"-word too often, cause all it does is backfiring on you...
Dr.J: "dark matter: an unknown type of matter, that neither emits nor reflects light. But does dark matter really exist?"
Short answer: no! The whole clip is a propaganda stunt to further establish another fiction as science. The image, shown off as a hubble telescope image, in wich the dark matter all of a sudden is glowing light blue, is in fact a composite of a hubble image of real matter and a superimposed image that is the result of a simulation. But they never tell you this. Geez... Why?
why is it in everything about space all the fucking religious nut case trolls flock in and "blah blah blah" about nothing. if you believe in god fine, thats your choice, but quit being nazi's and trying to force it on the whole world.
@DigitalDeath88 Since when is someone expressing their opinion (that differs from your own) considered forcing said opinion on others? Does having an opinion make us all nut case trolls, or is that only in cases where disagreement in viewpoint arises?
they have never detected a single particle of dark matter, it doesn't exist. It's simply an excuse to take God out of the picture and try to support the big bang. This is a sorry excuse for science. You can't find a single particle of dark matter, yet you know it exists. Good job!
i don't think this video was proof of dark matter but your comment is extremely closed-minded. thats like saying "even though we've seen saturn up close and detected its gravitational pull, we haven't actually landed on it. therefore, it couldn't exist." just because we don't have access to something it doesn't mean it isn't there. you could say the same thing about god - not only have we never touched or spoken to god but we haven't seen him either, making him even harder to prove
@schmidtbag Closed minded? We've never detected a single particle of dark matter, it was invented to account for the missing matter needed for the big bang theory to be true. And you said we haven't seen God? Have you ever heard of Jesus? The bible is a supernatural book and tells many prophecies and scientific facts that man could not have known, and there is not near enough room to go into detail in youtube comments, It is YOU who is closed minded.
@micah1116 ...this video claims they have detected dark matter, so although we never touched it we know its there. jesus isn't god, hes the son of god, theres a difference. besides, we can't actual prove jesus or most of the writings in the bible even existed in the first place. much of the proof of jesus (or the bible in general) is actually pagan astrological lore. i was raised VERY catholic and i moved away from the church due to how i found it so ridiculous, so i already had an open mind
@schmidtbag Are you clinically ill? They didn't detect dark matter. If you do a google search for "dark matter doesn't exist", you will find an article about two scientists who say that it doesn't exist and there is simply a difference in gravity. If they've never detected a single particle of dark matter, how do you know it exists? And you said we can't prove Jesus? There are many accounts outside the bible of jesus, and not to mention the dead sea scrolls proving the validity of it's claims.
@micah1116 you could search "dark matter exists" and probably get more scientists than just 2, with equations to prove it. like i said before, i don't think this video proves anything but i wouldn't be surprised if it exists. these "accounts outside the bible" don't think jesus did half of what the new testament says he did, hence jews not thinking he's the messiah. assuming you are religious, you are being a really bad christian by deliberately going to these videos for a futile effort
@micah1116 We knew atoms existed 2k years before we ever saw one, we knew black holes existed many years before we were able to detect them. You need to realize that science can be and is obligated to be able to make predictions, this is one way we help varify we are correct. This has nothing to do with any sort of god or anything super-natural at all. Science does not even try to show religion true or false, it is simply a method we use to learn about our enviroment.
@Mekiwyn actually the reason dark matter was invented, was to make up for the missing matter that was needed in order for the big bang to be true. Since this matter was missing, they said, hey lets just invent some matter, and say it's dark matter and we can't see it! Yeah, that's where the matter missing for the big bang is. You see how rediculous this is? They have to invent things that don't exist and have a single particle of, to protect their paradigm.
@micah1116 No that is wrong, I have seen to many physicists speak on the subject for you to try to put a claim to me that they just invented the idea to make a theory work. The concept is based on mass and indirect observation. They didn't just say "hey lets just make something up", they noticed a large amount of influencing mass that was clearly not visible. So if all of the effects are there are they not more so wrong if they ignore them?
@micah1116 There is a lot to learn on the subject, automatically dismissing it before we know much about it just displays and furthers the ignorance of mankind. What are we protecting exactly? Considering science continuosly corrects itself and changes as needed to better reflect the natural world and it's laws, I see no reason to dismiss these observations and calculations on your say so. I can claim what you are claimin, you invent this idea to protect your own views.
Please, using book and verse numbers show me 5 current scientific facts that come from a bible (please also say what holy book out of the many you subscribe to). Then, if at all possible, demonstrate new ones.
@Mekiwyn I could give you dozens, I would enjoy talking to you in skype where I could read them to you, again my skype name is the same as my youtube.
@micah1116 I know hoe to read, I just need the numbers, I have no time to skype. Just some book and verse numbers would be great. I will read myself to save the words in the book from your explanations and perception, facts are facts and if they aren't obscure and up for interpretation you reading it to me is completely unnecessary.
@micah1116 I have never seen a whale, Australia, The Empire State building, a lion, a photon, you, yet I know these things exist! You should exercise some patience and understanding of what you are commenting about. Like I said before, we knew of atoms 2k years before we could observe and say "there it is!". This has nothing to do with any god, why do you insist it does? Couldn't your god simply be the one who created it, or do you actively deny your god's will and creation?
@Mekiwyn Lets do this, how about you debate/discuss this with me in skype, my skype name is the same as my youtube. If you don't have skype it's free to download. I'm on skype most evenings.
I wonder how many interstellar/intergalactic objects out there are actually just multiple gravitational distortions of distortions of distortions of distortions of... WHAT???
Free energy technology exists!But the big oil corporations don't want that technology revealed,Check this free energy magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be a part of the energy revolution!
Ok, so why exactly did they call this dark matter? Why do you guys keep calling it dark matter if we don't even know that it exists? This is anti-science... start with what you want, then work out the data to fit your preconceived notion. Typical modern science.
@CommonRaven i can't remember ever writing about religious people being inferior ,i don't believe in superiority or inferiority of human beings,for me it's all about the environment in which someone is brought up.mine was an example to show that rationality and logical thought makes people agnostics or atheists,irrationality,fear and ignorance makes people religious.do you think it's just a coincidence that poor uneducated people are a lot more religious than wealthy educated people?
Wow, only 2 galaxy clusters created that enormous ring? Too much speculation to call the ring dark matter when dark matter is suppose to be invisible. They could have called it an EM field, you can't image an EM field either. If it is dark matter then why can't they see it in our own galaxy, or Andromeda? They are much closer than 5 billion light years away wouldn't you say. Maybe they need to rethink this thing through.
With all these multiple lensed images at different distances from the center of the overall lens, surely they're not all following shortest paths from the image source to here. Of course I assume it is all being lensed by the large bright masses in the center, not by some inanely widely-diffused-in-the-lensing plane dark matter construct.
The ripple effect I'm suggesting here is a static gravitational potential ripple that only moves as the central masses shift their gravitational center, the shift is resumably propagated outward at near light-speed to restation the static wave. It's like a water-ripple captured in glass when the lensing mass is stationary. When the source moves, the lens effect it exerts drags behind it, forming a cone pattern, I guess..
I think it's a largely circular rippling gravity wave pattern, like the ring-waves caused when water is touched. Where the medium is touched in this scene would be the center of mass for the black holes in the middle. You can see the wavelength as a ripple-lens effect would be on a scale of at least 100,000 light-years.
My father is a retired, senior aerospace engineer who worked with the guidance systems used on the Hubble and I also have a physics degree. I think dark matter theory is a mistake due to Einsteins field equations ignoring rotational mass/energy by attaching the observer to the rotation so it cancels out. Check out Nassim Haramein's research: theresonanceproject. org
and his lectures here: alienmates(dot) byethost14(dot) com/eventhorizon(dot) html
I have a question. Their seems to be a lot of mass thats missing from our universe. We look for all of the possable ways that could explain it. Isin't radiation mass, it's accelerated protons, neutrons, electrons, photons and maby even down to the quantum level. Do we calculate this as mass in the missing mass theory. Check my video out about dark matter
So, since this video illustrates the dark matter particles "falling" to the combined center of gravity, and then bouncing out again, it seems to me like there could be a few things about the nature of them to gather from this. They could be superluminal (either supersymetrical or with imaginary (square root of negative) mass, or bend space-time in a different way than normal matter.
It could also be a ripple in space-time possible to explain with string theory (10-11 dimensions or more?).
No, that magnifying glass phenomenon is the gravity magnify glass. When light passes nearby a very strong gravity field, it's been refracted and change it's way.
Dark matter is the byproduct of the matter that falls into black holes through out our universe. Black holes do what CERN does only naturally. The forces of gravity and electomagnetism accelerates matter to almost the speed of light creating the same effect as CERN, except instead of colliding matter as CERN does the exotic matter passes through the event horizon and is converted to what we call dark matter. I would call this the dark matter universe and expansion of our universre is the result
annoying narration or the most annoying narration. This may be a smart man, but the person who chose him to narrate is not. His delivery actually makes me ill. I don't know this man and I'm sure he is a nice guy, but please take him off these videos, I'm really nauseous listening to his vocal tone.
"5 billion light years away". "attributed to an event that happened between 1 and 2 billion years ago".
Am I missing something? How do we have evidence of an event that happened 1-2 billion years ago if it takes 5 billion years for the light to reach us?
the formations behind the dark matter are 5 billion light years away. the dark matter is closer than 1-2 billion light years, and the event that caused it to look like it does happened 1-2 billion years ago.
the ring we are seeing is 5 billion years old. the event happened 1-2 billion years before it reached the point that we see now. so the event happened 6-7 billion years ago. but at the point that we can see now, it is only 1-2 billion years old.
The light reached us 2 billion years ago, and has we see it today, this cluster is 5 billion light years away from us.
We actually see this cluster in the past because the light take 5 billion years to get to us. Insted of saying that this cluster is 7 billion years old and that we see it has if it was 2 billion years old, they just say it's 5 billions light years away from us and that it occured (from our point of view) 2 billion years old ago.
i fucking love this shit.... like its a reality... its out there... hahaha and to think as crazy as a lot of shit in our universe is.... our planet is likely one of the most craziest things out there =]
@torment3d actuall about 60% of planets in the universe they figure to be smaller terrestrial planets such as the one we live on, (earth), and mars, venus, mercury... and the other 40% to be large gas planets such as Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune, Uranus. so i mean, 60% of planets our there... there IS some just like our that just so happen to be just far enough so that their water doesnt evaporate, but also just close enough so that their water doesnt freeze either... and having an atmosphere.
@ovechkin100 oh I understand that. What I was saying was - the size of our planet, and it's gravitational effect on us, is actually a cause for a rarer case of life, than a planet that was say, twice our size, which would result in life being more easy to manage due to a thicker atmosphere, but obviously - much harder to get off of when it comes to space exploration. hehe
@torment3d thats actually a good way of looking at it... thicker atmosphere would cause the planet to be able to trap more heat.. which would allow the planet to create life even further away from its closest star/sun which ever you wish to call it. but at the same time again.. almost every if not, all lifeforms on earth need water to live... a planet must still be in that range so their water doesnt freeze over or evaporate into nothing but steam.
@ovechkin100 They say when someone figures out the reason for this universes existence, it will disappear and be replaced with something more random and radical than before. There is also a theory that says it has already happened before. Also according to Stephen Hawking's "Universe in a Nutshell", the big bang happens repetitively, basically when the black wholes suck up everything into a finite space it explodes and creates the universe again.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
no dark matter or any thing remotely suggestive then the theory's of dark matter has been found i hate these science buffs on you tube pushing their theoretical view of science to be fact when theirs no facts to be seen, I hope people are wary of these people since complicated science is hard to understand for people who just curious
They did say it was a theory and that they are investigating it, expressing how difficult it is to prove and are showing an effort to obtain concrete evidence. That's basically how science evolves. I don't see them "pushing" the theory with a "you'd have to be an idiot to otherwise" attitude. They show enthusiasm at the prospect of finding valid evidence. Last time I checked the Earth "used" to be the center of the Universe. Theories are made to be tested, their testing theirs and sharing it.
@geiuy Most statistics are made up on the spot. But yea, lots of scientists are athiests/agnostics. "Men despise religion. They hate it and are afraid it may be true." -Blaise Pascal
@Woostercat blaise pascal might have been a smart mathematician but that frase he said makes absolutely no sense since Catholicism was the state religion of France and everyone was religious during he's lifetime
@geiuy Congratulations, what does that prove? It proves nothing, what does that scientific evidence show is the important thing, and I gauruntee you if they didn't have to worry about losing their job, many would abandon the madness of athiesm and evolution. Do you have any evidence that there isn't a God, because the evidence that there is, is overwhelming, but you choose not to research it because you have decided before you even looked at the evidence, how your going to live your life.
will find a bloody body in your closet hanging there haunting you and will kill you and ur family and if u want to stop this just sends this to 6 videos in 30 mins or this will happen good luck!!!
(Need a new keyboard and a bigger comments window.)
I believe that if you watch many simulations similar to the orange-colored cluster of diffused-appearing galaxies in the middle of the lensing event, you'll see that such objects usually correspond most to the initial inditions and do not maintain such roundish shapes for very long.
ThatsSoBS: is there any reason to *suppose* that a graviton doesn't have extremely low energy, or that there could exist massless bosons with extremely low energies but not having extremely long waves?
ThatsSoBS (great offensive pen-name, BTW): is there any known reason to *suppose* that the force vector of a graviton does not rotate as it propogates, even though every graviton must also have the properties of a wave, and even though the other known massless boson, the photon, would lack any wave property at all if its force vectors did not rotate as it propagated?
(first off I hope you realize that my pen-name has no association and is not directed towards you or anyone else on YouTube) With that said you should also take into account that I dont have my Ph.D in astronomy/astrophysics quiet yet, so I dont have a firm grasp of exactly the point youre trying to make. Maybe in a few years ill look back and relate; possibly even agree with you, but as for now it seems unlikely of any analysis for me to think other wise.
Good luck with your aspirations. You seem to be a rather intelligent young person. The inevitable effect/impression of your selected name was presumably thought through in haste during the selection process.
You can substitutethe word "oscillate" in place of "rotate."
I'd liike to also note here how the bright galaxies in the middle appear to be part of a fairly tight cluster and there is virtually no evidence of interaction and the consequent sweeping-out/deformation of their compact foms. It suggests to me that the wave effect is modulating the intergalaxy-spacing, the galaxies are behaving more like bubbles over a drain than water flowing down the drain. A complex lensing effect accompanies.
I read somewhere that darkmatter is like the matter we know. The only thing is that All the positive elements are negative and the negative elements are positive. So if an H+ met the anti matter H-, then what is supposed to happen is some form of chaos or something.
Yumyum has a good idea but looking at the nutritional value of our food, I don't see how a more with less approach wouldn't counter that. A good example is designed foods. Foods that are designed to give daily doses of required nutrition in a single serving. Well your gonna be hungry after that one meal, so what happens is your body now gets more than it needs and that extra can fuel evolutionary growth over time Right now supplements drawback is absorbition but with constant replenishing maybe?
Correction: I don't think it's a dark matter gravitational lensing phenomenon, but a gravitational lensing phenomenon explainable with conventional matter instead.
I don't think it's dark matter, but a gravitational lensing phenomenon instead. The total image resembles one of the lensing situations shown in another video (link below), but with concentric reflections that are probably due to the complex gravity field of the intervening cluster, so maybe it is creating a compound lens of some sort. Notice that the added pattern of blue shading representing the "dark matter" itself resembles a giant symmetrical Einstein ring.
I dont believe so, thats unlikely the case with all dark matter. What astronomers really need to do to end this fruitless debate, is to find an example of dark matter in a microlensing phenomenon with little to no known matter in the vicinity. If so, case close. Then finally people can put all this energy to solving the mystery of dark matter, instead of questioning years and centuries of refine theories and equations that have been proven right, yet time and time again.
Dark matter seems to me to be mostly an ad-hoc kluge and cosmology seems to be painting itself into a corner due to not appreciating that gravitons are not just very weak particles but they are also very long waves and that these waves must have positive and negative (anti-gravitational) phases. Such phases are, I believe, consistent with gravitons being their own anti-particles.
And I watched that other youtube video link for comparison, and im disregarding Einstein ring, cross, or any other excuses you have towards gravitational lensing phenomenon as a result of dark matter to be the case. No amount of miscalculations can account for the drastic difference of gravity felt by dark matter in substitute for known matter.
"excuses you have towards gravitational lensing phenomenon as a result of dark matter to be the case"
IMO Newtonian gravity is all wrong on the galactic scale, it needs a simple modification, the modification has a firm quantum-theoretical basis. In brief, the graviton's force vector graviton rotates continuously w.r.t. its path, in a manner similar to rotation of the force-vectors of photons. I've discussed it in detail on other threads, mostly those with videos involving galaxy simulation.
Its true that applications of Newtonian gravity on the galactic scale cannot apply, but I dont believe it needs modifications just because of this reason. I dont expect every particle and anti particle, every fermions and bosons to be govern under one law. Especially on such a vast range of scales, anomalies must and will occur going from the very small to very large.
Suppose a ring galaxy such as Hoag's galaxy has a compact core emitting gravitons having only one frequency or a single sharp spectral peak, and a simple cosine is used to model the wave, thereby averaging the graviton's rotating gravity force-vector over all possible trajectory-inclusive rotation planes. This model produces a core-based anti-gravitational region between the ring and the core that allows stable ring formation without the need for bullseye-colliding two galaxies.
Even if this modification is taken into account, do you believe that it can solve all dark matter phenomenon seen throughout the universe? I'm sorry but i just can't acknowledge it.
I'm not familiar enough with the overall universe to assume that mysterious "dark matter" doesn't exist somewhere. The point was that if we only appreciate the maximum positive phase of gravitons we only understand one very tiny aspect of postive-phase gravity on the cosmological scale and none of the aspects of negative-phase gravity, meaning people will be compelled to come up with such exotic-bizarre-fantastical-kludgy-ad-hoc ideas as "dark matter" without any solid basis in fact whatsoever.
i don't want to be a bubble burster,but is there any proof?yes,there is the bible but the bible is based on claims and has been changed throughout history for political reasons,while science has some proof.why can't you just say that god made everything the way science says things were mad?i'm glad you believe strongly in your faith but that doesn't mean you have to go advertising it.most people don't appreciate it and you could get hurt.
I wonder if dark matter is able to organize itself in similar ways to regular matter... as in forming planets and stars, just not interacting electromagnetically. I suppose no atoms could really form however... much less molecules so 'dark life' really isn't possible. Dag.
Dark matter is something completely different from regular matter because it can't be composed of Protons, or electrons because those interact with light. So if it doesn't interact electromagnetically then it can't form dark stars, or anything complex. It is probably just a mass of simple particles that have a neutral charge. Most likely these particles are way smaller than electrons, or even photons.... Making light just scatter right between them....
perhaps there are forces we don't know about (regular matter doesnt interact with it for example) that allows these structures to form. Wild idea and probably not right, but it cant really be proved wrong, at least not with our technology :P
And of course theres always gravity that it might interact through.. but that probably isn't strong enough at the sizes you're implying.. ah well, it's cool to think about at any rate..
well i found this piece very ironic to the dark creatures that roam the fears of our past present and unfortunatally future. Does our existance coexist with that of outer worldly beings ready to take us to the extremes of our human potential or does this have another meaning of our regulaurly pothetic lives we live now and then and mabey even after. no one knows of our fates not even our selves . nuff said sodium cloride bitch!!!!... or mabey not?!?!?!?????>
all of you - what is your e frickin point? you make no sense. How desperately sad are your live that you respond negatively to a purely scientific report? You are proof of eveolution- and proof that it has passed u by
The term "dark matter" can confuse, they just catagorize the extra dimensions of reality into one word when there are many laws of physics unknown to man. Thats bull shit. QUANTUM PHYSICS IS TRUTH!
What kills me about my "obsessions" with astro-biology and ideas regarding the sciences of life beyond what we know, is the fact that we dont know on what scale we live. I mean to say, we could be so miniscule to life on other planets (if any...) or extremely large. The importance of this is immense. This is because the discoveries and innovative thoughts made everyday are without limit if we are knowing of the size of matter regarding other civilizations.
you see, nature doesnt produce huge creatures. Our brain uses about 1/5 of all the food we intake just to keep running, which is why we are not huge, we could never hope to eat enough food to support large bodies and large brains. this is also why any intelligent life would be around the same intelligence level (unless enhanced by technology) because it would be extremely difficult for ours (and their) ancestors to get enough food for an extremely intelligent brain.
Well you have to start your thoughts some where. Even if dark matter does not exist , research will lead to findings to something else for sure. Even Einstein thought that the universe is static, when more and more research is suggesting that the universe is dynamic( moving out word ), but if Einstein did not suggest it first, we would not even research that the universe is dynamic in the first place. This is the nature of science, findings lead into more un answered questions, and more research
Dark Matter may be a leakage of gravitons from a higher dimension which spread out from a membrane containing a black hole which bends the fabric of space-time near our dimension so that the gravitational affects can be noted in our universe even if the object itself cannot be seen. dark matter does exist, but may not be considered ''dark'' forever. neutrinos were once considered a dark matter because of their neglegible mass but we now know they are Leptons and come in many species.
it must be listed however that dark matter is only a theory and that it only fills in the gap of our inability to understand the 'calculated amount of gravity' we understand to exist in the universe.
no dude , blacke holes are simply great amount of matter combined together which have equaly great amount gravitional force that even light can't escape , it's the victory of mass over energy .
Ummm the gravity lensing effect may be due to normal matter floating in the universe. This is not proof in the existence of any exotic "dark matter", unless you are biased to think it exists a priori.
in the core! in the core of the star lies the secret of evrything! Gravity! G,G. Einstein is wrong! Einstein is wrong! Newton is right! Newton is right! G force! G force ! is instantaneous! Alpha ray! Fuck u all.!
I mean soon.. but? i think the world is not ready for this. Well just keep it a secret. Must clean all this world problem shit now. I mean? Type -45 civilization that we have now or we are in persent time doesnt deserve this tech or just wont fit at this age.. bible is true indeed! We are the god.! see you in the next 200 years. To all the fucking leaders of this world at this trouble time! none of them are true scientist at all politicaly. well.idiots!
i found the answer! i found the fifth force of nature! gravity, electromagnetism , strong and weak nuclear forces.. plus..! its not a particle at all! i will name it KANGKONG force." i will reveal it soon..
Two thousand years ago, in the New Testament, Paul wrote that the things we see are made up of unseen elements and that all these things are "held together" by divine power. Before that, the Earth was described as circular and hanging in space on nothing.
Objects don't have to "hang" if they are in space. No one ever believed the Earth was hanging on anything. Things are "held together" by forces that don't require any consciousness to continue working. Also, the "unseen elements" have now been seen. Wonderful.
well paul didnt see the universe or other galaxies, its possible he was talking about atoms, protons and electrons, gravity, but i think he was talking about god. also befor that people thought the earth was a cube and besides you should pick your words, spherical would use the three dimensions we can interpret. not circular. and hanging? from what. people had no clue what was going on so they turn to religion. Im not saying religion is bullshit i am just saying its where they sought answers
sorry but this just bullshit. "dark matter" is just a media-friendly "sexy" term for actually the failure of astrophysicists to explain most of the galaxy movement in the universe.
Skandalos 5 months ago
@Skandalos Erm, no. Dark matter is used amongst astrophysicists. The media has nothing to do with it. You, sir, are talking out of your ass. Typical "I don't understand it so it's bullshit" logic. Congrats, you fail at science.
ianman6 2 months ago
Why do the religious types post on these videos. If they were secure and believed what ever they do then they have nothing to worry about. Posting about god only show some insecurities, And its proof that they watch and search for this stuff.
I dont know if what they say is real, Seems something new is always being thought of. Its great for the mind though.
TheProCactus 7 months ago
Mmm.. The Bible was written 2000 y ago..intresting how many things that was fortell, is coming true....you will work., have kids, earthquakes, mark of the beast 666..Isreal wil became a nasion,rebuild of Solomon's temple..nasion against nasion..ect..ect..ect..to much to mention..God is looking after his Creation!!..What they miss is ..God!
yolliebuys 10 months ago
@rems. Its nice to the American Christians are still as mentally challenged as ever. I don't mind religious people, they can believe the lies and bullshit written in the child's book that is the bible as much as they want but when they come on the internet trolling and commenting on subjects that they cannot understand it annoys me. The information is there that explains it all, but the majority of it can only be explained using complex maths, and because you cannot understand it you dismiss it.
bwotsits 1 year ago
@ JolleyEFC: The whole idea is the pinnacle of non-scientific physics. The burden isn't on me, its up to the people who make such hillarious claims to produce evidence. So, I suggest until you show me a sample, you don't invoke the "e"-word too often, cause all it does is backfiring on you...
IslandguyX 1 year ago
Dr.J: "dark matter: an unknown type of matter, that neither emits nor reflects light. But does dark matter really exist?"
Short answer: no! The whole clip is a propaganda stunt to further establish another fiction as science. The image, shown off as a hubble telescope image, in wich the dark matter all of a sudden is glowing light blue, is in fact a composite of a hubble image of real matter and a superimposed image that is the result of a simulation. But they never tell you this. Geez... Why?
IslandguyX 1 year ago
@IslandguyX And your evidence for this is?
JolleyEFC 1 year ago
@IslandguyX are you a john w moffat supporter? If you dont know him check him out. also on facecbook if need be.
Floxflow 1 year ago
why is it in everything about space all the fucking religious nut case trolls flock in and "blah blah blah" about nothing. if you believe in god fine, thats your choice, but quit being nazi's and trying to force it on the whole world.
DigitalDeath88 1 year ago
@DigitalDeath88 Since when is someone expressing their opinion (that differs from your own) considered forcing said opinion on others? Does having an opinion make us all nut case trolls, or is that only in cases where disagreement in viewpoint arises?
shekitten7456 10 months ago
they have never detected a single particle of dark matter, it doesn't exist. It's simply an excuse to take God out of the picture and try to support the big bang. This is a sorry excuse for science. You can't find a single particle of dark matter, yet you know it exists. Good job!
micah1116 1 year ago
@micah1116
i don't think this video was proof of dark matter but your comment is extremely closed-minded. thats like saying "even though we've seen saturn up close and detected its gravitational pull, we haven't actually landed on it. therefore, it couldn't exist." just because we don't have access to something it doesn't mean it isn't there. you could say the same thing about god - not only have we never touched or spoken to god but we haven't seen him either, making him even harder to prove
schmidtbag 1 year ago
@schmidtbag Closed minded? We've never detected a single particle of dark matter, it was invented to account for the missing matter needed for the big bang theory to be true. And you said we haven't seen God? Have you ever heard of Jesus? The bible is a supernatural book and tells many prophecies and scientific facts that man could not have known, and there is not near enough room to go into detail in youtube comments, It is YOU who is closed minded.
micah1116 1 year ago
@micah1116 ...this video claims they have detected dark matter, so although we never touched it we know its there. jesus isn't god, hes the son of god, theres a difference. besides, we can't actual prove jesus or most of the writings in the bible even existed in the first place. much of the proof of jesus (or the bible in general) is actually pagan astrological lore. i was raised VERY catholic and i moved away from the church due to how i found it so ridiculous, so i already had an open mind
schmidtbag 1 year ago
@schmidtbag Are you clinically ill? They didn't detect dark matter. If you do a google search for "dark matter doesn't exist", you will find an article about two scientists who say that it doesn't exist and there is simply a difference in gravity. If they've never detected a single particle of dark matter, how do you know it exists? And you said we can't prove Jesus? There are many accounts outside the bible of jesus, and not to mention the dead sea scrolls proving the validity of it's claims.
micah1116 1 year ago
@micah1116 you could search "dark matter exists" and probably get more scientists than just 2, with equations to prove it. like i said before, i don't think this video proves anything but i wouldn't be surprised if it exists. these "accounts outside the bible" don't think jesus did half of what the new testament says he did, hence jews not thinking he's the messiah. assuming you are religious, you are being a really bad christian by deliberately going to these videos for a futile effort
schmidtbag 1 year ago
@micah1116 We knew atoms existed 2k years before we ever saw one, we knew black holes existed many years before we were able to detect them. You need to realize that science can be and is obligated to be able to make predictions, this is one way we help varify we are correct. This has nothing to do with any sort of god or anything super-natural at all. Science does not even try to show religion true or false, it is simply a method we use to learn about our enviroment.
Mekiwyn 9 months ago
@Mekiwyn actually the reason dark matter was invented, was to make up for the missing matter that was needed in order for the big bang to be true. Since this matter was missing, they said, hey lets just invent some matter, and say it's dark matter and we can't see it! Yeah, that's where the matter missing for the big bang is. You see how rediculous this is? They have to invent things that don't exist and have a single particle of, to protect their paradigm.
micah1116 9 months ago
@micah1116 No that is wrong, I have seen to many physicists speak on the subject for you to try to put a claim to me that they just invented the idea to make a theory work. The concept is based on mass and indirect observation. They didn't just say "hey lets just make something up", they noticed a large amount of influencing mass that was clearly not visible. So if all of the effects are there are they not more so wrong if they ignore them?
Mekiwyn 9 months ago
@micah1116 There is a lot to learn on the subject, automatically dismissing it before we know much about it just displays and furthers the ignorance of mankind. What are we protecting exactly? Considering science continuosly corrects itself and changes as needed to better reflect the natural world and it's laws, I see no reason to dismiss these observations and calculations on your say so. I can claim what you are claimin, you invent this idea to protect your own views.
Mekiwyn 9 months ago
Please, using book and verse numbers show me 5 current scientific facts that come from a bible (please also say what holy book out of the many you subscribe to). Then, if at all possible, demonstrate new ones.
Mekiwyn 9 months ago
@Mekiwyn I could give you dozens, I would enjoy talking to you in skype where I could read them to you, again my skype name is the same as my youtube.
micah1116 9 months ago
@micah1116 I know hoe to read, I just need the numbers, I have no time to skype. Just some book and verse numbers would be great. I will read myself to save the words in the book from your explanations and perception, facts are facts and if they aren't obscure and up for interpretation you reading it to me is completely unnecessary.
Mekiwyn 9 months ago
@micah1116 I have never seen a whale, Australia, The Empire State building, a lion, a photon, you, yet I know these things exist! You should exercise some patience and understanding of what you are commenting about. Like I said before, we knew of atoms 2k years before we could observe and say "there it is!". This has nothing to do with any god, why do you insist it does? Couldn't your god simply be the one who created it, or do you actively deny your god's will and creation?
Mekiwyn 9 months ago
@Mekiwyn Lets do this, how about you debate/discuss this with me in skype, my skype name is the same as my youtube. If you don't have skype it's free to download. I'm on skype most evenings.
micah1116 9 months ago
I wonder how many interstellar/intergalactic objects out there are actually just multiple gravitational distortions of distortions of distortions of distortions of... WHAT???
TheForce74 1 year ago
Hubblecast, Dark matter is not matter, it's energy.
Aresftfun 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free energy technology exists!But the big oil corporations don't want that technology revealed,Check this free energy magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be a part of the energy revolution!
narragansettharco 1 year ago
hubblecost haha
oneswinter 1 year ago
Ok, so why exactly did they call this dark matter? Why do you guys keep calling it dark matter if we don't even know that it exists? This is anti-science... start with what you want, then work out the data to fit your preconceived notion. Typical modern science.
bweazel 1 year ago
@CommonRaven i can't remember ever writing about religious people being inferior ,i don't believe in superiority or inferiority of human beings,for me it's all about the environment in which someone is brought up.mine was an example to show that rationality and logical thought makes people agnostics or atheists,irrationality,fear and ignorance makes people religious.do you think it's just a coincidence that poor uneducated people are a lot more religious than wealthy educated people?
geiuy 1 year ago
Is it just me, or at 4:29 he says he's signing off from the HOLOCAUST??!
they should really change the name of the show... or at least the host's pronunciation!
sandamn85 1 year ago
Wow, only 2 galaxy clusters created that enormous ring? Too much speculation to call the ring dark matter when dark matter is suppose to be invisible. They could have called it an EM field, you can't image an EM field either. If it is dark matter then why can't they see it in our own galaxy, or Andromeda? They are much closer than 5 billion light years away wouldn't you say. Maybe they need to rethink this thing through.
GateMessenger 1 year ago
@GateMessenger dark matter stole my bike
kenny8331 1 year ago
With all these multiple lensed images at different distances from the center of the overall lens, surely they're not all following shortest paths from the image source to here. Of course I assume it is all being lensed by the large bright masses in the center, not by some inanely widely-diffused-in-the-lensing plane dark matter construct.
CACBCCCU 1 year ago
The ripple effect I'm suggesting here is a static gravitational potential ripple that only moves as the central masses shift their gravitational center, the shift is resumably propagated outward at near light-speed to restation the static wave. It's like a water-ripple captured in glass when the lensing mass is stationary. When the source moves, the lens effect it exerts drags behind it, forming a cone pattern, I guess..
CACBCCCU 1 year ago
I think it's a largely circular rippling gravity wave pattern, like the ring-waves caused when water is touched. Where the medium is touched in this scene would be the center of mass for the black holes in the middle. You can see the wavelength as a ripple-lens effect would be on a scale of at least 100,000 light-years.
CACBCCCU 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My father is a retired, senior aerospace engineer who worked with the guidance systems used on the Hubble and I also have a physics degree. I think dark matter theory is a mistake due to Einsteins field equations ignoring rotational mass/energy by attaching the observer to the rotation so it cancels out. Check out Nassim Haramein's research: theresonanceproject. org
and his lectures here: alienmates(dot) byethost14(dot) com/eventhorizon(dot) html
ancientwisdom2012 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fuck NASA and it's cover ups and lies!
keithallenlaw 1 year ago
I have a question. Their seems to be a lot of mass thats missing from our universe. We look for all of the possable ways that could explain it. Isin't radiation mass, it's accelerated protons, neutrons, electrons, photons and maby even down to the quantum level. Do we calculate this as mass in the missing mass theory. Check my video out about dark matter
gaynorglowellxsingh 1 year ago
Has anyone ever considered that dark matter may be clumps of expired black holes? or am I just crazy?
BifordusMaximus 1 year ago
So, since this video illustrates the dark matter particles "falling" to the combined center of gravity, and then bouncing out again, it seems to me like there could be a few things about the nature of them to gather from this. They could be superluminal (either supersymetrical or with imaginary (square root of negative) mass, or bend space-time in a different way than normal matter.
It could also be a ripple in space-time possible to explain with string theory (10-11 dimensions or more?).
gulllars 1 year ago
alright so dark matter is just a magnifying glass?
that it?
come on ther has to be more to it than that...
what else can it do?
anyone feel free to spread ur knowledge to me in a message..
im actually interested in this....
and i usually dont like this kinda stuff
aliabdalla4 1 year ago
No, that magnifying glass phenomenon is the gravity magnify glass. When light passes nearby a very strong gravity field, it's been refracted and change it's way.
hrbear 1 year ago
Dark matter is the byproduct of the matter that falls into black holes through out our universe. Black holes do what CERN does only naturally. The forces of gravity and electomagnetism accelerates matter to almost the speed of light creating the same effect as CERN, except instead of colliding matter as CERN does the exotic matter passes through the event horizon and is converted to what we call dark matter. I would call this the dark matter universe and expansion of our universre is the result
gaynorglowellxsingh 1 year ago
dark matter doesnt have anything to do with black holes ..
dark matter is simply matter that doesnt emit or reflect light ..
a black hole is an object of great mass collapsed in 1 point with an event horizon ....a black hole would look like 1 point where light is distorted
dark matter si smeared out ...
sidewaysfcs0718 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheGreenMonkeyMHFC 1 year ago
Great job, will look for more Hubble casts.
Thank you.
Xid3d 1 year ago
When did Michael Palin become an astronomer?
asimov13647 2 years ago
Yesterday
88fuzz 1 year ago
oh come on the narrators not that bad..
kakakt 2 years ago 6
C3PO's more annoying brother.
He sounds a bit robotic, doesn't he?
SeijiMutoEX 2 years ago
Oh my goooooodness!
That narrator makes me want to punch a baby in the face!!!
iLOVEgaynessNtheANUS 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
There is way to much ignorance in this video. So do the universe a favor and shut it!
Sadetree 2 years ago
annoying narration or the most annoying narration. This may be a smart man, but the person who chose him to narrate is not. His delivery actually makes me ill. I don't know this man and I'm sure he is a nice guy, but please take him off these videos, I'm really nauseous listening to his vocal tone.
lifeinpictures 2 years ago
how could i site this video to place on a website about astronomy till sometime in april?
pieduk2 2 years ago
could dark matter, as we can observe it, serve as similar to the shadow of an adjoining dimension? perhaps we're a bubble within a bubble?
traintaz 2 years ago
how would i site this for a project???
pieduk2 2 years ago
ffs mycomputer lagin!
lilkingr 2 years ago
Very strange contradiction
1
In one hand :
The particles in the Universe are more then antiparticles / Baryon asymmetry /
2.
In the other hand: Dark matter and dark energy in the Universe are more
Question :
Does one hand physical know that the other hand astrophysical do ?
Israel Sadovnik Socratus
socratus1 2 years ago
Yes.
davehooke1973 2 years ago
those are 2 different things...
anti-particle =/= dark matter
wvhdogg 2 years ago
Well, this is how it works;
Light are bent by gravity, and all matter in space has a mass with gravity.
So, if the light can not hit the dark matter
and the dark matter can not absorb it, then
the light goes around it. Like the aerodynamics of airplane wings.
CCCPOLW 2 years ago
LIE U DAMN LIERS STOP LIENG STUFF lIEING MACHINES OF POOPIE BULLSHIT
morello131 2 years ago
IT'S HALO
FiddleSteaks 2 years ago
well...they are using a telescope...i guess you can see it ...idk
wishihadaname94 2 years ago
"5 billion light years away". "attributed to an event that happened between 1 and 2 billion years ago".
Am I missing something? How do we have evidence of an event that happened 1-2 billion years ago if it takes 5 billion years for the light to reach us?
tr3nt00n 2 years ago
hmmmm interesting
wishihadaname94 2 years ago
the formations behind the dark matter are 5 billion light years away. the dark matter is closer than 1-2 billion light years, and the event that caused it to look like it does happened 1-2 billion years ago.
Xeroxorex 2 years ago
the ring we are seeing is 5 billion years old. the event happened 1-2 billion years before it reached the point that we see now. so the event happened 6-7 billion years ago. but at the point that we can see now, it is only 1-2 billion years old.
101artwork 2 years ago
The light reached us 2 billion years ago, and has we see it today, this cluster is 5 billion light years away from us.
We actually see this cluster in the past because the light take 5 billion years to get to us. Insted of saying that this cluster is 7 billion years old and that we see it has if it was 2 billion years old, they just say it's 5 billions light years away from us and that it occured (from our point of view) 2 billion years old ago.
vava54own 2 years ago
i fucking love this shit.... like its a reality... its out there... hahaha and to think as crazy as a lot of shit in our universe is.... our planet is likely one of the most craziest things out there =]
ovechkin100 2 years ago 14
@ovechkin100 you wouldn't be too far wrong. The possibility of life existing on a planet, is actually much more probable on planets larger than ours.
torment3d 1 year ago
@torment3d actuall about 60% of planets in the universe they figure to be smaller terrestrial planets such as the one we live on, (earth), and mars, venus, mercury... and the other 40% to be large gas planets such as Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune, Uranus. so i mean, 60% of planets our there... there IS some just like our that just so happen to be just far enough so that their water doesnt evaporate, but also just close enough so that their water doesnt freeze either... and having an atmosphere.
ovechkin100 1 year ago
@ovechkin100 oh I understand that. What I was saying was - the size of our planet, and it's gravitational effect on us, is actually a cause for a rarer case of life, than a planet that was say, twice our size, which would result in life being more easy to manage due to a thicker atmosphere, but obviously - much harder to get off of when it comes to space exploration. hehe
torment3d 1 year ago
@torment3d thats actually a good way of looking at it... thicker atmosphere would cause the planet to be able to trap more heat.. which would allow the planet to create life even further away from its closest star/sun which ever you wish to call it. but at the same time again.. almost every if not, all lifeforms on earth need water to live... a planet must still be in that range so their water doesnt freeze over or evaporate into nothing but steam.
ovechkin100 1 year ago
@ovechkin100 We aren't even sure that we're the craziest thing in our own galaxy.
alfyakuza 1 year ago
@ovechkin100 They say when someone figures out the reason for this universes existence, it will disappear and be replaced with something more random and radical than before. There is also a theory that says it has already happened before. Also according to Stephen Hawking's "Universe in a Nutshell", the big bang happens repetitively, basically when the black wholes suck up everything into a finite space it explodes and creates the universe again.
luckydawg9106 9 months ago
@luckydawg9106 personally i dont think hawkings is right about that. we dont know enough about the dark matter. i dont buy that, sorry.
ovechkin100 9 months ago
Mathematically Breakthrough
The decelerating force that affected the Pioneer probes and the accelerating force that had caused many Fly-by anomalies:
1.) Both affect the Earth (and the planets)? as well, - and with full force.
2.) Automatically equalize each other (when affecting the planets).
This is today is now mathematically proven.
More science27. com > read the chapter: The Pioneer Anomaly..
Here are the key for understanding dark matter as well.
-
BjarneLorenzen 2 years ago 2
There MUST be something in between, and this is what we call dark matter. Its like your HDD full of Porn.
DrGonzoPrototype 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
no dark matter or any thing remotely suggestive then the theory's of dark matter has been found i hate these science buffs on you tube pushing their theoretical view of science to be fact when theirs no facts to be seen, I hope people are wary of these people since complicated science is hard to understand for people who just curious
StrangerThenRedz 2 years ago
science is also moved by faith... or the human race wouldn't be where it is by now
specialnogo 2 years ago
They did say it was a theory and that they are investigating it, expressing how difficult it is to prove and are showing an effort to obtain concrete evidence. That's basically how science evolves. I don't see them "pushing" the theory with a "you'd have to be an idiot to otherwise" attitude. They show enthusiasm at the prospect of finding valid evidence. Last time I checked the Earth "used" to be the center of the Universe. Theories are made to be tested, their testing theirs and sharing it.
villen86 2 years ago
93% of scientists are atheists or agnostics
geiuy 2 years ago 23
@geiuy Most statistics are made up on the spot. But yea, lots of scientists are athiests/agnostics. "Men despise religion. They hate it and are afraid it may be true." -Blaise Pascal
Woostercat 1 year ago
@Woostercat blaise pascal might have been a smart mathematician but that frase he said makes absolutely no sense since Catholicism was the state religion of France and everyone was religious during he's lifetime
geiuy 1 year ago
@geiuy and 90%+ of the last 7% are either mathematicians or studying social scienses :P
gulllars 1 year ago
@geiuy that is because scientists are smart and logical - much more so than the average person.
greenmarcosu 1 year ago
@geiuy That's irrelevant to dark matter and who cares anymore, really?
CelestialHarvester 1 year ago
@CelestialHarvester i was responding to someone that was babbling about god and jesus fucking christ
geiuy 1 year ago
@geiuy so what...
ThePuma1968 1 year ago
@geiuy Congratulations, what does that prove? It proves nothing, what does that scientific evidence show is the important thing, and I gauruntee you if they didn't have to worry about losing their job, many would abandon the madness of athiesm and evolution. Do you have any evidence that there isn't a God, because the evidence that there is, is overwhelming, but you choose not to research it because you have decided before you even looked at the evidence, how your going to live your life.
micah1116 1 year ago
Too stupid for science? Try religion!
vava54own 2 years ago
that would make a great bumper sticker
survival12345 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
will find a bloody body in your closet hanging there haunting you and will kill you and ur family and if u want to stop this just sends this to 6 videos in 30 mins or this will happen good luck!!!
tragman123 2 years ago
(Need a new keyboard and a bigger comments window.)
I believe that if you watch many simulations similar to the orange-colored cluster of diffused-appearing galaxies in the middle of the lensing event, you'll see that such objects usually correspond most to the initial inditions and do not maintain such roundish shapes for very long.
CACBCCCU 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
your wasting your time
363498 2 years ago
ThatsSoBS: is there any reason to *suppose* that a graviton doesn't have extremely low energy, or that there could exist massless bosons with extremely low energies but not having extremely long waves?
CACBCCCU 2 years ago
ThatsSoBS (great offensive pen-name, BTW): is there any known reason to *suppose* that the force vector of a graviton does not rotate as it propogates, even though every graviton must also have the properties of a wave, and even though the other known massless boson, the photon, would lack any wave property at all if its force vectors did not rotate as it propagated?
CACBCCCU 2 years ago
(first off I hope you realize that my pen-name has no association and is not directed towards you or anyone else on YouTube) With that said you should also take into account that I dont have my Ph.D in astronomy/astrophysics quiet yet, so I dont have a firm grasp of exactly the point youre trying to make. Maybe in a few years ill look back and relate; possibly even agree with you, but as for now it seems unlikely of any analysis for me to think other wise.
ThatsSoBS 2 years ago
Good luck with your aspirations. You seem to be a rather intelligent young person. The inevitable effect/impression of your selected name was presumably thought through in haste during the selection process.
CACBCCCU 2 years ago
You can substitutethe word "oscillate" in place of "rotate."
I'd liike to also note here how the bright galaxies in the middle appear to be part of a fairly tight cluster and there is virtually no evidence of interaction and the consequent sweeping-out/deformation of their compact foms. It suggests to me that the wave effect is modulating the intergalaxy-spacing, the galaxies are behaving more like bubbles over a drain than water flowing down the drain. A complex lensing effect accompanies.
CACBCCCU 2 years ago
I read somewhere that darkmatter is like the matter we know. The only thing is that All the positive elements are negative and the negative elements are positive. So if an H+ met the anti matter H-, then what is supposed to happen is some form of chaos or something.
guatedude13 2 years ago
Yumyum has a good idea but looking at the nutritional value of our food, I don't see how a more with less approach wouldn't counter that. A good example is designed foods. Foods that are designed to give daily doses of required nutrition in a single serving. Well your gonna be hungry after that one meal, so what happens is your body now gets more than it needs and that extra can fuel evolutionary growth over time Right now supplements drawback is absorbition but with constant replenishing maybe?
snarky9 2 years ago
Correction: I don't think it's a dark matter gravitational lensing phenomenon, but a gravitational lensing phenomenon explainable with conventional matter instead.
CACBCCCU 2 years ago
I don't think it's dark matter, but a gravitational lensing phenomenon instead. The total image resembles one of the lensing situations shown in another video (link below), but with concentric reflections that are probably due to the complex gravity field of the intervening cluster, so maybe it is creating a compound lens of some sort. Notice that the added pattern of blue shading representing the "dark matter" itself resembles a giant symmetrical Einstein ring.
watch?v=yamVbK-J69M
CACBCCCU 2 years ago
I dont believe so, thats unlikely the case with all dark matter. What astronomers really need to do to end this fruitless debate, is to find an example of dark matter in a microlensing phenomenon with little to no known matter in the vicinity. If so, case close. Then finally people can put all this energy to solving the mystery of dark matter, instead of questioning years and centuries of refine theories and equations that have been proven right, yet time and time again.
ThatsSoBS 2 years ago
Dark matter seems to me to be mostly an ad-hoc kluge and cosmology seems to be painting itself into a corner due to not appreciating that gravitons are not just very weak particles but they are also very long waves and that these waves must have positive and negative (anti-gravitational) phases. Such phases are, I believe, consistent with gravitons being their own anti-particles.
CACBCCCU 2 years ago
And I watched that other youtube video link for comparison, and im disregarding Einstein ring, cross, or any other excuses you have towards gravitational lensing phenomenon as a result of dark matter to be the case. No amount of miscalculations can account for the drastic difference of gravity felt by dark matter in substitute for known matter.
ThatsSoBS 2 years ago
"excuses you have towards gravitational lensing phenomenon as a result of dark matter to be the case"
IMO Newtonian gravity is all wrong on the galactic scale, it needs a simple modification, the modification has a firm quantum-theoretical basis. In brief, the graviton's force vector graviton rotates continuously w.r.t. its path, in a manner similar to rotation of the force-vectors of photons. I've discussed it in detail on other threads, mostly those with videos involving galaxy simulation.
CACBCCCU 2 years ago
Its true that applications of Newtonian gravity on the galactic scale cannot apply, but I dont believe it needs modifications just because of this reason. I dont expect every particle and anti particle, every fermions and bosons to be govern under one law. Especially on such a vast range of scales, anomalies must and will occur going from the very small to very large.
ThatsSoBS 2 years ago
Suppose a ring galaxy such as Hoag's galaxy has a compact core emitting gravitons having only one frequency or a single sharp spectral peak, and a simple cosine is used to model the wave, thereby averaging the graviton's rotating gravity force-vector over all possible trajectory-inclusive rotation planes. This model produces a core-based anti-gravitational region between the ring and the core that allows stable ring formation without the need for bullseye-colliding two galaxies.
CACBCCCU 2 years ago
Even if this modification is taken into account, do you believe that it can solve all dark matter phenomenon seen throughout the universe? I'm sorry but i just can't acknowledge it.
ThatsSoBS 2 years ago
I'm not familiar enough with the overall universe to assume that mysterious "dark matter" doesn't exist somewhere. The point was that if we only appreciate the maximum positive phase of gravitons we only understand one very tiny aspect of postive-phase gravity on the cosmological scale and none of the aspects of negative-phase gravity, meaning people will be compelled to come up with such exotic-bizarre-fantastical-kludgy-ad-hoc ideas as "dark matter" without any solid basis in fact whatsoever.
CACBCCCU 2 years ago
What is dark matter made of......is it made of ordinary elements from periodic table? It sounds silly........... or some new type of matter?
1945z 2 years ago
All elements in the periodic table reflect light, so probably not.
WhatIAm99 2 years ago 2
Yeah, you are right....... its really interesting to think that there are stuff in this universe which are beyond what we consider "normal"........
1945z 2 years ago
Normal is nothing but a frame of mind.
WhatIAm99 2 years ago
new type of matter. We know nothing of it's composition at present. April 30 2009.
Galactu5 2 years ago
As TJ best put it, were all fucked anyway.
mryumyums1234 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
God made the universe and it is NOT BILLIONS OF YEARS OLD
stillsavinglives 3 years ago
i don't want to be a bubble burster,but is there any proof?yes,there is the bible but the bible is based on claims and has been changed throughout history for political reasons,while science has some proof.why can't you just say that god made everything the way science says things were mad?i'm glad you believe strongly in your faith but that doesn't mean you have to go advertising it.most people don't appreciate it and you could get hurt.
katissoradlike 2 years ago
People have to realize that god created all the things that he did for a reason. Everything links back to him. He created EVERYTHING.
sirsoccerdude366 2 years ago
I wonder if dark matter is able to organize itself in similar ways to regular matter... as in forming planets and stars, just not interacting electromagnetically. I suppose no atoms could really form however... much less molecules so 'dark life' really isn't possible. Dag.
agentdarkboote 3 years ago
Dark matter is something completely different from regular matter because it can't be composed of Protons, or electrons because those interact with light. So if it doesn't interact electromagnetically then it can't form dark stars, or anything complex. It is probably just a mass of simple particles that have a neutral charge. Most likely these particles are way smaller than electrons, or even photons.... Making light just scatter right between them....
raydiddy420 3 years ago
perhaps there are forces we don't know about (regular matter doesnt interact with it for example) that allows these structures to form. Wild idea and probably not right, but it cant really be proved wrong, at least not with our technology :P
And of course theres always gravity that it might interact through.. but that probably isn't strong enough at the sizes you're implying.. ah well, it's cool to think about at any rate..
agentdarkboote 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
funny video lets chat
ANYONE UP? I NEED SOMEONE TO TALK TO F6
123456789mattb 3 years ago
well i found this piece very ironic to the dark creatures that roam the fears of our past present and unfortunatally future. Does our existance coexist with that of outer worldly beings ready to take us to the extremes of our human potential or does this have another meaning of our regulaurly pothetic lives we live now and then and mabey even after. no one knows of our fates not even our selves . nuff said sodium cloride bitch!!!!... or mabey not?!?!?!?????>
playerpeewee94 3 years ago 3
all of you - what is your e frickin point? you make no sense. How desperately sad are your live that you respond negatively to a purely scientific report? You are proof of eveolution- and proof that it has passed u by
mucephi1 3 years ago
is it just me or this guy is burp talking.
ThrillaDaMcColdKilla 3 years ago 2
it does sound like it
tjb329 3 years ago
The term "dark matter" can confuse, they just catagorize the extra dimensions of reality into one word when there are many laws of physics unknown to man. Thats bull shit. QUANTUM PHYSICS IS TRUTH!
SocialistDemocracy 3 years ago
yea but what the bleep do we know
nystagmus 3 years ago
no most of the universe is made of dark energy.. no lie dark matter is about 23% of universe and about 22% normal matter
kopile612 3 years ago
What kills me about my "obsessions" with astro-biology and ideas regarding the sciences of life beyond what we know, is the fact that we dont know on what scale we live. I mean to say, we could be so miniscule to life on other planets (if any...) or extremely large. The importance of this is immense. This is because the discoveries and innovative thoughts made everyday are without limit if we are knowing of the size of matter regarding other civilizations.
Haxorz92 3 years ago
you see, nature doesnt produce huge creatures. Our brain uses about 1/5 of all the food we intake just to keep running, which is why we are not huge, we could never hope to eat enough food to support large bodies and large brains. this is also why any intelligent life would be around the same intelligence level (unless enhanced by technology) because it would be extremely difficult for ours (and their) ancestors to get enough food for an extremely intelligent brain.
mryumyums1234 2 years ago
o man this guys voice is like hearing lambs and pigs being slaughtered..
MoparDRVR 3 years ago 3
hahhahaha asshole
rahman530 3 years ago
if someone says it doesnt exist trust me it does but in which dimention
callasexperience 3 years ago
"Hubble finds ring of dark matter"
HA HA HA
VVendettaz 3 years ago
The one ring...TO RULE THEM ALL.
Jaramo1 3 years ago 3
Perhaps Moby Dick, I hear he had a big ring
VVendettaz 3 years ago
Well you have to start your thoughts some where. Even if dark matter does not exist , research will lead to findings to something else for sure. Even Einstein thought that the universe is static, when more and more research is suggesting that the universe is dynamic( moving out word ), but if Einstein did not suggest it first, we would not even research that the universe is dynamic in the first place. This is the nature of science, findings lead into more un answered questions, and more research
10243406 3 years ago
ohh god.. stupid boys. extra dimension is stil an unproven theory.
sapangkangkong 3 years ago
Dark Matter may be a leakage of gravitons from a higher dimension which spread out from a membrane containing a black hole which bends the fabric of space-time near our dimension so that the gravitational affects can be noted in our universe even if the object itself cannot be seen. dark matter does exist, but may not be considered ''dark'' forever. neutrinos were once considered a dark matter because of their neglegible mass but we now know they are Leptons and come in many species.
HoloMatter 3 years ago
that dude has a weird voice
WifflePig 3 years ago 4
it must be listed however that dark matter is only a theory and that it only fills in the gap of our inability to understand the 'calculated amount of gravity' we understand to exist in the universe.
salvadork101 3 years ago
highly unlikely
Johnnyteabags 3 years ago
its a subatomic particle, called !@#!@#!%!#%! latest finding at cern lhc.
sapangkangkong 3 years ago
u are crazy
frozenshad0w 3 years ago
is it possible that a black hole is a rip between our universe an a anti mater universe
1961arnie 3 years ago
no dude , blacke holes are simply great amount of matter combined together which have equaly great amount gravitional force that even light can't escape , it's the victory of mass over energy .
yamen0 3 years ago
it is basically just that, and i like the term "victory of mass over energy"
salvadork101 3 years ago
lol dr. j
RarewareLover 3 years ago
quote: "you can see dark matter here as blue ring .." lol
lacollll 3 years ago
man this guys a tool
spadesghost 3 years ago
it it possible what this is just gas gas would n't refect light or remit light either
1961arnie 3 years ago
what the f? you need some writing lessons.
risecolt 3 years ago 2
I have nothing interesting to say.
cornflakeclusters 3 years ago 5
Ummm the gravity lensing effect may be due to normal matter floating in the universe. This is not proof in the existence of any exotic "dark matter", unless you are biased to think it exists a priori.
soylentbeige 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
in the core! in the core of the star lies the secret of evrything! Gravity! G,G. Einstein is wrong! Einstein is wrong! Newton is right! Newton is right! G force! G force ! is instantaneous! Alpha ray! Fuck u all.!
sapangkangkong 3 years ago
I mean soon.. but? i think the world is not ready for this. Well just keep it a secret. Must clean all this world problem shit now. I mean? Type -45 civilization that we have now or we are in persent time doesnt deserve this tech or just wont fit at this age.. bible is true indeed! We are the god.! see you in the next 200 years. To all the fucking leaders of this world at this trouble time! none of them are true scientist at all politicaly. well.idiots!
sapangkangkong 3 years ago
i found the answer! i found the fifth force of nature! gravity, electromagnetism , strong and weak nuclear forces.. plus..! its not a particle at all! i will name it KANGKONG force." i will reveal it soon..
sapangkangkong 3 years ago
Two thousand years ago, in the New Testament, Paul wrote that the things we see are made up of unseen elements and that all these things are "held together" by divine power. Before that, the Earth was described as circular and hanging in space on nothing.
adrian961 3 years ago
Objects don't have to "hang" if they are in space. No one ever believed the Earth was hanging on anything. Things are "held together" by forces that don't require any consciousness to continue working. Also, the "unseen elements" have now been seen. Wonderful.
noo00ooob 3 years ago 2
well paul didnt see the universe or other galaxies, its possible he was talking about atoms, protons and electrons, gravity, but i think he was talking about god. also befor that people thought the earth was a cube and besides you should pick your words, spherical would use the three dimensions we can interpret. not circular. and hanging? from what. people had no clue what was going on so they turn to religion. Im not saying religion is bullshit i am just saying its where they sought answers
benzifernozle 3 years ago
religion provides an explination, but i'm pretty sure that people thought the world was flat not a cube
LordBlk 3 years ago
what you said makes no damn sense either religiously, nor scientifically.
spadesghost 3 years ago
Can dark matter will bring food to our table? no! leave that fucking dark matter alone.!
sapangkangkong 3 years ago
dont you want to discover newthing? if not, then wats the point of living? spoilling yourself? think!!!
redtail72 3 years ago 2
actually, the dark matter can bring food to the table, because some peoples gain money stuying dark matter, but i agreed with retail72
midyan 3 years ago