ok my take on nudity. We all have a body and body parts. What is the big deal. There is nothing wrong with nudity at all. It's people that look at it as it's wrong. If we where all nude you would not know if a person is rich or poor. It would not make a difference because we would not have clothes on. It's because we have so many clothes on that people wonder what it would be like nude. Give it a try it's not so bad....
ahhhhhhhhh, get over it prude fucks, its the human body, and everyone has one. its not like this art museum has porn stars having a gang bang. could it be some prudes are just self concious? get over it fuckers!
if art is about reaction then could watching someone be murdered be seen as art? all of this modern art is bullshit great example of the emperors new cloths
What a fucking retard, he knows fuck-all about art. This exhibit is not the same as sexualization of society, it may well be a parody or critique of it. I can't believe this video has many likes, if you're not capable of interpreting art, don't fucking try to criticise it. What makes him think his is a valid opinion regarding this art exhibit?
boy oh boy... i can't believe you can actually make a video with such retarded concepts. criticism is one thing. complete ignorance is something else...
lets see, i dont understand why you can judge something just because is nude, i dont see anything wrong with that..if u are thinking they are just two pervs maybe u are one, everyone whos involved in this world we named art just see two bodys we dont even see them as people.
ok maybe its not necessary use naked bodys, but u have to think what does it stands for; whats nudity? why two? and if u dont like it, dont watch it and dont judge something u have never experienced:)
wow black man your to much in church or relagion common this is 2012 now move on and get use to it and yes it is very nice art thx do you think poeple on youtube will leave good comment about your shit common bro get real
The human body is art, but doing it like that is a whole different type. Their using the naked body as an excuss to say "oh, I was sexually asulted", but using that for that museum is the wrong way to use it. If you wanna see nake body as art go to a different video, because that isn't art!. Art is when you use your body and other structures of art with the photos or films.
LOL, if people would stop being such prudes and not see nudity as disgusting then it wouldn't be a bad thing. If you keep teaching children the body is something to be hidden then they will continue to think just like you do.
That was actually a performance piece by a super wicked awesome artist named Maria Abramovic… it was supposed to make people who walk into the room uncomfortable and have to choose which way they wanted to enter (butt touching woman or man vs genitals touching woman or man) … kinda like in fight club where tyler is on the plane and he says "Now, as a question of etiquette- as I pass, do I give you the ass or the crotch?"…kinda awesome, no?
@OneEyedWiener Well said, and for the record, the traditional etiquette, at least in europe, is to give them the crotch, your front is straight and doesn't protrude into someone's face, while the butt bulges and gets to close, and you can't monitor the movement of the bum so you might bump someone (if you're plump), me, i would be curteous towards the lady, and gather my jacket while walking by.
The to people under me are stupid. Everyone has their own opinion. And God made us naked... ha dum ass what did u expect to come out The vagina with some Jordan's lol.shut The hell up!! He right of corse these models are going to Get groped on if u put ur shit out their what do u expect. THis is 2012.
? If you are not able to make a difference between art and porno it's your problem! I find US obtuse and schizophrenic about nudity but is not my country. I know your solution BURKA :-)))
This "reporter" should go to the strip club & grab the girls there inappropriately to see what that gets him. In the event he is lucky he will simply be tossed out with few bruises,cuts &scrapes, otherwise he will end up really hurting.
This dude must be training for a job in the corporate press incomplete, misleading information in the vid, along with preconditioning the audience before reporting the article. Reinforcing the notion in most of the West that nudity is bad, without that notion there is no story. Too few don't read the info box, many who didn't read this vids info will end up thinking that to enter some unknown museum they would have to squeeze between nude people
No the naked body isn't disgusting, and yes it can be considered art but a couple of naked people standing around like clothes-less hobos is NOT art. I don't care who you are, what you say, what tyoe of artist you are. Any REAL, HARD-WORKING, ARTIST that takes their work SERIOUSLY knows that this shit is just ridiculous. People work their butts off in college w/their passion for art yet some shitwad tells a bunch of naked people to stand together and he gets his shit displayed in a museum.
I think that the plain exposure of the human body does not necessarily have to be thought of as "sex" or "porn"... What has happened is that society has marked the exposure of the body as necessarily related to sex, instead of simply... (this is an example and not necessarily true) the model´s way of accepting their own body, or the artist´s way of saying we should stop covering our "faults" and simply start to be.
@moonlitgirl25 If every time you see a naked body you freak out because you think it has to do with sex, look more at yourself and what that says about you
You are right! In name of art, Nero burned Rome. Then and now, nobody think about it as artistic work. But the human nature is nice; and all depend of tipical questions: Where, when, how, why?
art my dick! those nude so-called-artists are nothing but desperate models and actors/actresses who will whore themselves at any opportunity to be noticed or discovered. they'd eat shit if steven spielberg asked them to.
I think it's art. It would make me very uncomfortable to pass between them, which is the whole point probably. I would still be willing to try because I've simply not done it before in my life. The worst case I've encountered so far: I was invited to an art school for a possible position. There was an exhibition where a woman made pictures with the blood she collected from her periods.
There is nothing perverted about nudity. It is natural ,but made to be criminal by the ruling elites and they have made war(the profits of war always going to some bastard in a suit) and mass killing to be applauded. What a twisted sick society.
@pussinagoodcat A comedian named Pat Paulson, from the 60's once did a monologue on censorship in the US, and in part of he said, "If space aliens are monitoring our television they probable think that nudity and sex are bad but violence is perfectly ok".
The purpose of the exhibition is NOT to further sell sex and be "perverted," in fact the opposite. It's meant to be a commentary on how uncomfortable people are with the naked body due to the social standards we live under today. It's meant to teach people the corruption of their thoughts due to what the media tells us.
perhaps. Even if so, it's still foolish. They had to know these women would be touched by some pervert, at the very least. Judging by those legs they chose women who were at least fairly hot. Seems fishy. Seems like some big practical joke.
i looked at the art project and it looks like the aim of it is to make you feel uncomfortable. As here in the U.S. being naked has been shunned though we will try to make suggestions or show as much as possible without showing the real thing. I don't know the artist's intent, but it comes off as though it is saying "blam" in your face nudity. Without having to look at it from behind closed doors on a computer or sneaking peeks at the girl bent over in front of you.
I agree that art is sometimes or many times taken a bit too far but on this subject particularly, maybe a museum is not the appropriate place to show naked models but what's the big deal with children asking "what is this? and what is that?". Just explain to them what is this and that. What's so wrong with explaining scientifically to a child what a man thing and woman thing does??
Untill we can walk by two naked women without the urge to fondle them and just appreciate their beauty as human beings, we are the same old nasty perverts that this world has raised us to be.
I think the notion of putting this in a museum as art is silly. I think creating art requires some talent and vision. Any idiot can pay a couple of people to stand naked in a public place. I would like to ask the artist if this is what she aspired to become? What she has become is really not an artist at all.
"This isn’t about sensationalism. The exhibition is too intimate and too personal and the artist is too present to allow any room for sensationalism. On the surface, the exhibition is about discomfort and fear and the gamut of insecurities that fill the spaces between these two experiences. At the crux, the exhibition is about the viewer’s (and the performers’) confrontation of these very real, very universal human experiences."
This piece was about getting yourself into the space between two individuals. The feeling of intruding on two human beings and their shared space. Being naked is not a big deal.
Art has come to mean anything shocking, controversial, insulting, or downright repulsive. Whatever became of beauty, things that leave you feeling good? It seems almost all forms of art now are about making you depressed or outraged. Its all so extreme! Of course, the art snob would say beauty is subjective, so then we're back to square one. My advice....don't take your kids to an exhibit such as the one being described here, and if you don't like it, don't support it by going to see it.
if you don't want to see the exhibit - DON'T LOOK. i know, here in the US we don't take control of our own actions, we find it better to impose our beliefs and desires onto everyone else. and for goodness sakes - CHILDREN MIGHT SEE A NAKED BODY!!! Gee wizz - i've seen naked bodies my whole life and it hasn't affected me in the least. if you raise the child to believe it's 'nasty' then they will believe it is nasty. grow up - you're supposed to be the adult. 'nuf said.
If you were more informative, like what museum this exhibition was hosted, who was the artist ect., this video could have been better and would have legitimized your point more if you presented the original information and context.
@freshtildeathonline Like what was the artist or artists' intention for piece. Why live nude models. What it's suppose to mean to the artist and what they want to translate. Presenting just the actual title of the exhibit would help a lot. Are the models paid (most likely) or were they volunteers, who were the people modeling (not individually, but were the models other artists, art models or fashion models) Is this show one shot or a touring exhibit in different museums.
@freshtildeathonline Context is like the circumstance around the show. Is it a contemporary art museum, traditional? What was the audience reaction (you hit on some feeling violated by the models). What were the politics surrounding it, protests, art world reaction ect. Was the show successful or was it a bomb. You don't need to hit on everything (for me), and you could probably think of something I'm not thinking of. but just some info on the actual art would balance out your opinion.
i tell you one thing: this 2 naked people standing there are redoing an art work that has been done 30 years ago. and if you are worried about how children are going to think about it, then the only thing you should be worried about is that someone should explain to them the meaning of why these people are standing there and what the artist was thinking about when she made this. please don't be so ignorant and shallow.
There is a difference between what some of these people are referring to as indecency and art. There have been countless paintings and sculptures showing the NAKED human body, and these two naked models are not in the least trying to make a statement about sex. It is about the discomfort that we all have when confronted with something we don't generally see. Sex is not the issue here. Art is what you decide to make it. If you don't like it. Leave. That is all.
Krazykkid. uh yeah.. First of all they were not masturbating. second, they were working with the museum and I'm sure there were viewer discretion advised warnings before entering (i.e. if you are some immature krazykid stay out.) third, you are no artist and apparently you seem jealous that you cant jack off wherever you want. .. you have no point.
@daboognish88 Yeah, but if they were masturbating, they would get away with it by just saying it's art. It's not art, it's just being naked like little whores. Oh but don't get a boner if you see them because then you are the pervert. Fucking retards, it's in my genes to want to fondle every girl I see, specially if they're naked.
40% of Iraq has been irradiated and rendered unfit for human habitation with "depleted" uranium; millions of Iraqi citizens have been maimed, a million or more murdered by coalition forces, principally fr. the U.S. For lack of clean water, food & penicillin: cholera, dysentery, ear infections (and vitamin-deficiency diseases: pellagra, cancer, sub-clinical scurvy) are decimating the nation's children. Why? Iraq is referred to as "the laboratory." How far can these people be pushed?
It's only perverted to those who decide to see it as such. If you have a problem with nudity, i'd assume you wouldn't go to the exhibit. But I guess bitching about it makes you feel important . And as far as taking children to the exhibit, some families would have no problem with it. It's THEIR choice. I'm sure that there was a disclaimer befor you got into that part of the museum. And if you choose to go into it, you accept the disclaimer. Ignorance is no excuse. Y'all just like complaning.
Nudity equals perverted only in term of culture. Natural laws saying nudity is just a the way of living. In fact, back in hundreds of years ago, girls wears no bra. In AFRICA, AFRICA, AFRICA, from TV, I see people part of the tribes are NAKED. Yet, it's 2011.
@austincox23 If you believe in creation then you'd believe that we were created naked. But this video is not referring to nudity in general, it's referring to the exhibit specifically and the motive behind it
@freshtildeathonline It doesn't have to mean specifically that you believe in creation though. It could mean that because you can see what is happening before your own eyes when a baby is born that you believe people were created naked. We put clothes on a baby, the baby isn't born with clothes on. You don't have to be religious to think that, you just have to have a common understanding of science.
@austincox23 I am sure there is some of that out there(Naked art) That is worth looking at for other reasons then self stimulation. However You can say naked a few more times.. I dig it. What is and isnt art is not something I think can be defined. It is all about the perspective of the artist and one who veiws said art to determine.
Also, my English has absolutely nothing to do with anything. My sentence structure is bad only because the majority of people say it is. In truth, my sentences are a work of art.
Anyway, I can speak four languages. An educated person such as yourself should not forget that not everyone in youtube is from the US.
My point wasn't to compare anything, I merely pointed out how ludicrous your argument is. The point of the video was to comment on the ever-so-popular sex advertisement, which they now call art. In your comment you were raving about the majority and the culture thousands of years ago. If we were to take that road in every debate we would get absolutely nowhere.
If the idea of a simple naked body was not held in such a view of disgust, the art community would have less incentive to use sex as their medium.
What "Fresh til Death" shoud understand is that artists crave contriversy, so complaining about what he hates in art will only help the prosparity of the art form.
why not ask Black Sabbath how well they did after enough christians started bitching?
In a broader sense, Leroy's kinda got himself a point. We don't need sex to pervade absolutely everything. There are other things and it does piss me off that our media uses sex as a vehicle for selling us, what is basically, shit. Our films, music, tv, magazines, newspapers.. they're all shit but nothing sells like a naked body.. and we buy it because we're immature fucking morons who don't understand how we're being scammed
lol they had this during Nuit Blanche last year in Toronto....it felt weird going trough those naked people =~= they were at the exit door so everyone had to go through.
society made it that our natural body its self is shown differently.... people dont know how to handle the naked form and abuses it.... art can be anything and the natural body is art....
Your question is its own answer. Nude doesn't mean "free to grope." It's not the fault of those who are nude, but the infantile people who don't know how to behave. The inappropriate actions of those visiting the installation speak to the need for it to continue. If you're child doesn't know what the parts are, you've got larger problems than them seeing someone nude. Better they see nude people than violence.
"The whole society is getting so highly sexed." This doesn't make any sense. I saw this exhibit was making sex and nudity feel natural. It was disturbing but comforting.
I was there for that exhibit. It was set in a back room, and you didn't have to go near the nude people. They put up a false wall inside the room- you could go through the doorway in one end of the wall with the nude people, or go to the opposite end of the wall where there was a Non Nude Person doorway. And that was hardly the most disturbing piece in that exhibit or at the MOMA that day.
You have created NUDE pieces?? Art, like some jokes, isn't always going to be understood by everyone. Truthfully I am a bit jealous because it is such a great piece of work. It is very thought provoking and made to stir you down to the core unless you just see two naked people. This style is what I want to create, not paintings of pretty flowers and sunshine and green grass. Look back at some of the more famous artists, sure there are pretty flower paintings but there is also the abnormal.
@freshtildeathonline do you know the artist? the reason for putting there these two nude models as to deal with the problematicy of the limits between fiction and reality, it's called parafiction and has nothing to do with nudity itself, in this case nudity is just a problem presented to the public and it could have been something else (this is not her only work). Here nudity has nothing sexual, nothing social, nothing pornographic, it is just helping to present the problem of truth and reality.
It will be banned if it's in my country though . we once had a crazy couple from about few years back , they walk totally naked in the streets just for advertisement
And it become our first headline in our country
To me .. there's nothing wrong naked , it's just depend on how you look and think about it .
Naked is art sure it is , if you don't think it until a lewd way of art .
Sex also an art ,
Homo Sapiens are once naked too .
Even animals are naked , meaning they're pervert ? XD
The funny part is he doesn't mention (or realize) the fact that the piece, Imponderabilia, was first performed in the 1970's. Unless Abramovic knew decades ago that her work would start destroying American society now.
Comment removed
drltscott 13 hours ago
Dumb ass. Then what the hell do you call figure drawing? Naked doesn't have to be sexual.
DNova1202 14 hours ago
ok my take on nudity. We all have a body and body parts. What is the big deal. There is nothing wrong with nudity at all. It's people that look at it as it's wrong. If we where all nude you would not know if a person is rich or poor. It would not make a difference because we would not have clothes on. It's because we have so many clothes on that people wonder what it would be like nude. Give it a try it's not so bad....
josh08671 1 day ago
@snafu21 Nudity isnt disgusting.just coz ur body is horrid doesnt mean everyone elses is
ohEcto 1 day ago
ahhhhhhhhh, get over it prude fucks, its the human body, and everyone has one. its not like this art museum has porn stars having a gang bang. could it be some prudes are just self concious? get over it fuckers!
digmynewsocks 3 days ago 2
if art is about reaction then could watching someone be murdered be seen as art? all of this modern art is bullshit great example of the emperors new cloths
Bowsie369 3 days ago
art is about reaction
hudstar2011 5 days ago
Art with a capital F...
KINGSWIMMERdotcom 1 week ago
Nudity is not erotism and erotism is not porn.
If you can not understand this probably you've got a problem.
Sunamitron 1 week ago
@Sunamitron just had to explain this to a friend!! I sculpted a naked preg lady wo hardly ANY detail and she thought it was gross...lol go figure
COULDNTthinkNAMEOFa 1 week ago
BUM NAKED
strunzal 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i have a troll on world of warcraft that sounds just like this guy
amyhuk 1 week ago
What a fucking retard, he knows fuck-all about art. This exhibit is not the same as sexualization of society, it may well be a parody or critique of it. I can't believe this video has many likes, if you're not capable of interpreting art, don't fucking try to criticise it. What makes him think his is a valid opinion regarding this art exhibit?
piratsindre17 1 week ago
boy oh boy... i can't believe you can actually make a video with such retarded concepts. criticism is one thing. complete ignorance is something else...
whearomanian 1 week ago
lets see, i dont understand why you can judge something just because is nude, i dont see anything wrong with that..if u are thinking they are just two pervs maybe u are one, everyone whos involved in this world we named art just see two bodys we dont even see them as people.
ok maybe its not necessary use naked bodys, but u have to think what does it stands for; whats nudity? why two? and if u dont like it, dont watch it and dont judge something u have never experienced:)
zinitaph 1 week ago
fuck
MrHarshdeep99 1 week ago
wow black man your to much in church or relagion common this is 2012 now move on and get use to it and yes it is very nice art thx do you think poeple on youtube will leave good comment about your shit common bro get real
mecanicman66 1 week ago
The human body is art, but doing it like that is a whole different type. Their using the naked body as an excuss to say "oh, I was sexually asulted", but using that for that museum is the wrong way to use it. If you wanna see nake body as art go to a different video, because that isn't art!. Art is when you use your body and other structures of art with the photos or films.
DemonGirl91311 2 weeks ago
LOL, if people would stop being such prudes and not see nudity as disgusting then it wouldn't be a bad thing. If you keep teaching children the body is something to be hidden then they will continue to think just like you do.
snafu21 2 weeks ago 8
That was actually a performance piece by a super wicked awesome artist named Maria Abramovic… it was supposed to make people who walk into the room uncomfortable and have to choose which way they wanted to enter (butt touching woman or man vs genitals touching woman or man) … kinda like in fight club where tyler is on the plane and he says "Now, as a question of etiquette- as I pass, do I give you the ass or the crotch?"…kinda awesome, no?
OneEyedWiener 2 weeks ago in playlist Season 2010 2
@OneEyedWiener Well said, and for the record, the traditional etiquette, at least in europe, is to give them the crotch, your front is straight and doesn't protrude into someone's face, while the butt bulges and gets to close, and you can't monitor the movement of the bum so you might bump someone (if you're plump), me, i would be curteous towards the lady, and gather my jacket while walking by.
piratsindre17 1 week ago
Good video man.
HollywoodCreeper 2 weeks ago
You have too much time on your hands.
rachelmothafuckaaa 2 weeks ago 3
@rachelmothafuckaaa I got the same 24 hours in a day as everyone else ; )
freshtildeathonline 2 weeks ago 12
The to people under me are stupid. Everyone has their own opinion. And God made us naked... ha dum ass what did u expect to come out The vagina with some Jordan's lol.shut The hell up!! He right of corse these models are going to Get groped on if u put ur shit out their what do u expect. THis is 2012.
savvywhite21 2 weeks ago
Its art to get a reaction from people to test peoples thoughts.
Really its your thoughts that are the problem not the naked people.
We were all naked once you know!
MishaKirra 2 weeks ago
God created Man and women naked, not with clothes on.
Your an ignorant piece of shit. I bet u hate us whites too. cabron
Nitemincher 2 weeks ago
Specialy naked ones
chorizo347 2 weeks ago
Fuck niggers
chorizo347 2 weeks ago
Dis man him tarkin' out him arse man......
Personally me would cop a feel mon.... and say 'look where de lord has plaice it'.
Nuttin' rong wid a pussy watchman.....
porty500 2 weeks ago
GAY
Drivlesh 2 weeks ago
LOL! Boom! Naked somebody else!
hotdogloco12345 2 weeks ago
? If you are not able to make a difference between art and porno it's your problem! I find US obtuse and schizophrenic about nudity but is not my country. I know your solution BURKA :-)))
airpiroscam 3 weeks ago
This "reporter" should go to the strip club & grab the girls there inappropriately to see what that gets him. In the event he is lucky he will simply be tossed out with few bruises,cuts &scrapes, otherwise he will end up really hurting.
waswestkan 3 weeks ago
This dude must be training for a job in the corporate press incomplete, misleading information in the vid, along with preconditioning the audience before reporting the article. Reinforcing the notion in most of the West that nudity is bad, without that notion there is no story. Too few don't read the info box, many who didn't read this vids info will end up thinking that to enter some unknown museum they would have to squeeze between nude people
waswestkan 3 weeks ago
prudes
Critiqify 3 weeks ago
No the naked body isn't disgusting, and yes it can be considered art but a couple of naked people standing around like clothes-less hobos is NOT art. I don't care who you are, what you say, what tyoe of artist you are. Any REAL, HARD-WORKING, ARTIST that takes their work SERIOUSLY knows that this shit is just ridiculous. People work their butts off in college w/their passion for art yet some shitwad tells a bunch of naked people to stand together and he gets his shit displayed in a museum.
TheChickenRiceBowl 3 weeks ago
I think that the plain exposure of the human body does not necessarily have to be thought of as "sex" or "porn"... What has happened is that society has marked the exposure of the body as necessarily related to sex, instead of simply... (this is an example and not necessarily true) the model´s way of accepting their own body, or the artist´s way of saying we should stop covering our "faults" and simply start to be.
moonlitgirl25 3 weeks ago
@moonlitgirl25 If every time you see a naked body you freak out because you think it has to do with sex, look more at yourself and what that says about you
moonlitgirl25 3 weeks ago 2
You are right! In name of art, Nero burned Rome. Then and now, nobody think about it as artistic work. But the human nature is nice; and all depend of tipical questions: Where, when, how, why?
MrROYALGAR 3 weeks ago
Stupiid negro voice.
bluegrassblazen 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
hznfrst 3 weeks ago
@bluegrassblazen More stupid redneck peckerwood.
hznfrst 3 weeks ago
Complaining about naked chicks? You're a faggot, plain and simple.
xxxIronLeexxx 1 month ago
@xxxIronLeexxx Didn't read the info box, and made an ignorant comment didn't ya? There could be 2 naked chicks, or there could be 2 naked dudes.
waswestkan 3 weeks ago
true that dude!
supersingify 1 month ago
this is bullshit....fuck you man
code93breaker 1 month ago
The way they were standing you almost have to touch them to pass them. They are the ones touching you inappropriately by obstructing your passage.
baigandine 1 month ago
hehehehe
cannaBcoin 1 month ago
art my dick! those nude so-called-artists are nothing but desperate models and actors/actresses who will whore themselves at any opportunity to be noticed or discovered. they'd eat shit if steven spielberg asked them to.
AlexBrasil123123 1 month ago
I think it's art. It would make me very uncomfortable to pass between them, which is the whole point probably. I would still be willing to try because I've simply not done it before in my life. The worst case I've encountered so far: I was invited to an art school for a possible position. There was an exhibition where a woman made pictures with the blood she collected from her periods.
EarphonesOn 1 month ago
There is nothing perverted about nudity. It is natural ,but made to be criminal by the ruling elites and they have made war(the profits of war always going to some bastard in a suit) and mass killing to be applauded. What a twisted sick society.
pussinagoodcat 1 month ago 2
@pussinagoodcat A comedian named Pat Paulson, from the 60's once did a monologue on censorship in the US, and in part of he said, "If space aliens are monitoring our television they probable think that nudity and sex are bad but violence is perfectly ok".
robtay1963 1 month ago in playlist videos
id grab a titty
lcedawg 1 month ago
The purpose of the exhibition is NOT to further sell sex and be "perverted," in fact the opposite. It's meant to be a commentary on how uncomfortable people are with the naked body due to the social standards we live under today. It's meant to teach people the corruption of their thoughts due to what the media tells us.
OBrien548 1 month ago 2
@OBrien548 Yes! Thank you!
RosieDesire 1 month ago
@OBrien548
perhaps. Even if so, it's still foolish. They had to know these women would be touched by some pervert, at the very least. Judging by those legs they chose women who were at least fairly hot. Seems fishy. Seems like some big practical joke.
waldoman7 1 month ago
@OBrien548 Amen! ! !
BANANADAIQURI 1 week ago
Am I the only person who's deeply disturbed by the fact that it's a black guy who has a problem with this?
Hunteristics 1 month ago
i looked at the art project and it looks like the aim of it is to make you feel uncomfortable. As here in the U.S. being naked has been shunned though we will try to make suggestions or show as much as possible without showing the real thing. I don't know the artist's intent, but it comes off as though it is saying "blam" in your face nudity. Without having to look at it from behind closed doors on a computer or sneaking peeks at the girl bent over in front of you.
skim1983 1 month ago
god invented sex..dont mock gods work
MrNewgus 1 month ago
I agree that art is sometimes or many times taken a bit too far but on this subject particularly, maybe a museum is not the appropriate place to show naked models but what's the big deal with children asking "what is this? and what is that?". Just explain to them what is this and that. What's so wrong with explaining scientifically to a child what a man thing and woman thing does??
fututrepilot1 1 month ago
Untill we can walk by two naked women without the urge to fondle them and just appreciate their beauty as human beings, we are the same old nasty perverts that this world has raised us to be.
daboognish88 2 months ago
@onlyforABC its not worth it the video is poo
emilythe11emo 2 months ago
yep u right , this is not a art
PCS2012 2 months ago
I think the notion of putting this in a museum as art is silly. I think creating art requires some talent and vision. Any idiot can pay a couple of people to stand naked in a public place. I would like to ask the artist if this is what she aspired to become? What she has become is really not an artist at all.
Mountainriri 2 months ago
It's inappropriate people for sure and I'm not lying
jasper1237278 2 months ago
GROW UP, seriously.
"This isn’t about sensationalism. The exhibition is too intimate and too personal and the artist is too present to allow any room for sensationalism. On the surface, the exhibition is about discomfort and fear and the gamut of insecurities that fill the spaces between these two experiences. At the crux, the exhibition is about the viewer’s (and the performers’) confrontation of these very real, very universal human experiences."
sethdesade 2 months ago
This piece was about getting yourself into the space between two individuals. The feeling of intruding on two human beings and their shared space. Being naked is not a big deal.
sethdesade 2 months ago
Art has come to mean anything shocking, controversial, insulting, or downright repulsive. Whatever became of beauty, things that leave you feeling good? It seems almost all forms of art now are about making you depressed or outraged. Its all so extreme! Of course, the art snob would say beauty is subjective, so then we're back to square one. My advice....don't take your kids to an exhibit such as the one being described here, and if you don't like it, don't support it by going to see it.
katkins001 2 months ago
you, sir, are an old lady prude.
get a life. Don't you have any better battles to fight?
rmutt4 2 months ago
art, or porn? i think its plain sleezy.
DennisLottig 2 months ago
if you don't want to see the exhibit - DON'T LOOK. i know, here in the US we don't take control of our own actions, we find it better to impose our beliefs and desires onto everyone else. and for goodness sakes - CHILDREN MIGHT SEE A NAKED BODY!!! Gee wizz - i've seen naked bodies my whole life and it hasn't affected me in the least. if you raise the child to believe it's 'nasty' then they will believe it is nasty. grow up - you're supposed to be the adult. 'nuf said.
Gronditty 2 months ago 23
Whats wrong with nudity ??? NOTHING . and YES IT IS ART you ignorant asshole .
caitiejim 2 months ago
@caitiejim This issue is not with nudity, the issue is the artists reason behind the exhibit which she is labeling as art.
freshtildeathonline 2 months ago
@caitiejim Question is, what isn't art to you?
realar 2 weeks ago
If you were more informative, like what museum this exhibition was hosted, who was the artist ect., this video could have been better and would have legitimized your point more if you presented the original information and context.
coreyluvsyams 2 months ago
@coreyluvsyams What is the original information and context???
freshtildeathonline 2 months ago
@freshtildeathonline Like what was the artist or artists' intention for piece. Why live nude models. What it's suppose to mean to the artist and what they want to translate. Presenting just the actual title of the exhibit would help a lot. Are the models paid (most likely) or were they volunteers, who were the people modeling (not individually, but were the models other artists, art models or fashion models) Is this show one shot or a touring exhibit in different museums.
coreyluvsyams 2 months ago
@freshtildeathonline Context is like the circumstance around the show. Is it a contemporary art museum, traditional? What was the audience reaction (you hit on some feeling violated by the models). What were the politics surrounding it, protests, art world reaction ect. Was the show successful or was it a bomb. You don't need to hit on everything (for me), and you could probably think of something I'm not thinking of. but just some info on the actual art would balance out your opinion.
coreyluvsyams 2 months ago
@freshtildeathonline srry you said museum of modern art, but is it new york, la?
coreyluvsyams 2 months ago
stupid black bastard
superbasil121 2 months ago
nigger!!!!!!!!!!!!
kochiyose12 2 months ago
i tell you one thing: this 2 naked people standing there are redoing an art work that has been done 30 years ago. and if you are worried about how children are going to think about it, then the only thing you should be worried about is that someone should explain to them the meaning of why these people are standing there and what the artist was thinking about when she made this. please don't be so ignorant and shallow.
FrankAryes 2 months ago
Did somebody else came here to see if it was a bangang ?
xSurinach 2 months ago
asshole guy...
jackpearl2011 2 months ago
shut the fuck up you stupid fuck
TheRazvan666 2 months ago
is it bad to say, that all I wanna do is listen to this guys accent. HOT
tombolom2 2 months ago
Well when it comes to using Nude models in an ART sense then I need only to say........"Ancient Greece" That is all.
WatchdogDisciple 2 months ago
There is a difference between what some of these people are referring to as indecency and art. There have been countless paintings and sculptures showing the NAKED human body, and these two naked models are not in the least trying to make a statement about sex. It is about the discomfort that we all have when confronted with something we don't generally see. Sex is not the issue here. Art is what you decide to make it. If you don't like it. Leave. That is all.
whiterosethorn58 2 months ago
So if they do it it's called art but If I go there and take my dick out to jack off I go to jail?
Fuck that.
KrazyKKid 2 months ago 17
@KrazyKKid Yes, you got the point, what would be the limit to what we label as "art?
freshtildeathonline 2 months ago
Krazykkid. uh yeah.. First of all they were not masturbating. second, they were working with the museum and I'm sure there were viewer discretion advised warnings before entering (i.e. if you are some immature krazykid stay out.) third, you are no artist and apparently you seem jealous that you cant jack off wherever you want. .. you have no point.
daboognish88 2 months ago
@daboognish88 Yeah, but if they were masturbating, they would get away with it by just saying it's art. It's not art, it's just being naked like little whores. Oh but don't get a boner if you see them because then you are the pervert. Fucking retards, it's in my genes to want to fondle every girl I see, specially if they're naked.
KrazyKKid 2 months ago
@KrazyKKid Now that's art. Make sure you make nice patterns on the walls though.
BedStuyBro 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
robustcherub18 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KrazyKKid i say you do things knowing the possible consequences of your actions. if you're not ready,to face them, then don't.
robustcherub18 2 weeks ago
40% of Iraq has been irradiated and rendered unfit for human habitation with "depleted" uranium; millions of Iraqi citizens have been maimed, a million or more murdered by coalition forces, principally fr. the U.S. For lack of clean water, food & penicillin: cholera, dysentery, ear infections (and vitamin-deficiency diseases: pellagra, cancer, sub-clinical scurvy) are decimating the nation's children. Why? Iraq is referred to as "the laboratory." How far can these people be pushed?
SimmerInJuly 2 months ago
It's only perverted to those who decide to see it as such. If you have a problem with nudity, i'd assume you wouldn't go to the exhibit. But I guess bitching about it makes you feel important . And as far as taking children to the exhibit, some families would have no problem with it. It's THEIR choice. I'm sure that there was a disclaimer befor you got into that part of the museum. And if you choose to go into it, you accept the disclaimer. Ignorance is no excuse. Y'all just like complaning.
gnanmorder 2 months ago
xDDD what the fuck??
MrAirBlader 2 months ago
anybody can translate this video IN chinese?````please!!!!!
onlyforABC 2 months ago
@onlyforABC I don't think so...
freshtildeathonline 2 months ago
@onlyforABC I might be able to
slaytesics 2 months ago
They try to ignore the sexual nature behind being naked!
planktonite 2 months ago
Art is what you make of it, but I see what you're saying totally. Everyone's got to push the envelope and be "edgy," it becomes preposterous.
nmr85 2 months ago
@nmr85 Yes, and then what would be the limit to what we call art?
freshtildeathonline 2 months ago
Nudity equals perverted only in term of culture. Natural laws saying nudity is just a the way of living. In fact, back in hundreds of years ago, girls wears no bra. In AFRICA, AFRICA, AFRICA, from TV, I see people part of the tribes are NAKED. Yet, it's 2011.
chhavan 2 months ago
boring commentary. fukking waste of tym.
G6Music 2 months ago
6x "an" @ 0:15
Crovaxx2 2 months ago
I like your thinking man, I wish more people thought like this in the west.
tapaddtiiiii 2 months ago
...he has a point
4m2r2n 2 months ago
is it really perverted? should humans be wearing clothes at all in the first place?
austincox23 2 months ago 21
@austincox23 If you believe in creation then you'd believe that we were created naked. But this video is not referring to nudity in general, it's referring to the exhibit specifically and the motive behind it
freshtildeathonline 2 months ago
@freshtildeathonline you don't have to believe in creation to believe we were created naked....babies are born naked everyday
zimmawoman 2 months ago
@zimmawoman Which points back to creation of humans.
freshtildeathonline 2 months ago
@freshtildeathonline It doesn't have to mean specifically that you believe in creation though. It could mean that because you can see what is happening before your own eyes when a baby is born that you believe people were created naked. We put clothes on a baby, the baby isn't born with clothes on. You don't have to be religious to think that, you just have to have a common understanding of science.
zimmawoman 2 months ago
@freshtildeathonline I CHOOSE EGG!!!
XxHornet21zxX 2 months ago
@austincox23 I am sure there is some of that out there(Naked art) That is worth looking at for other reasons then self stimulation. However You can say naked a few more times.. I dig it. What is and isnt art is not something I think can be defined. It is all about the perspective of the artist and one who veiws said art to determine.
Yemrots77 2 months ago
@austincox23 yes...
wayne99999999999 2 months ago
@wayne99999999999 explain why....
austincox23 2 months ago
@austincox23 So we wont be naked. duh.
wayne99999999999 2 months ago
@wayne99999999999 I am not even going to explain what my point was because you already sound way too ignorant.
austincox23 2 months ago
@austincox23 pffft You don't even know what ignorant means.
wayne99999999999 2 months ago
@austincox23
you are smart, but I dont think people will agree with you
Vids4Dinner 1 month ago
Comment removed
Losseeh 2 months ago
Comment removed
Losseeh 2 months ago
@PCuzrMiroku
..
Also, my English has absolutely nothing to do with anything. My sentence structure is bad only because the majority of people say it is. In truth, my sentences are a work of art.
Anyway, I can speak four languages. An educated person such as yourself should not forget that not everyone in youtube is from the US.
Losseeh 2 months ago
@PCuzrMiroku
My point wasn't to compare anything, I merely pointed out how ludicrous your argument is. The point of the video was to comment on the ever-so-popular sex advertisement, which they now call art. In your comment you were raving about the majority and the culture thousands of years ago. If we were to take that road in every debate we would get absolutely nowhere.
..
Losseeh 2 months ago
Very nice speech and I completely agree.
Losseeh 3 months ago
i believe that it´s just because we´re not used to see naked people all around in public.
HitAltF4Please 3 months ago
:(
Sex and nudity should not be taboo.
If the idea of a simple naked body was not held in such a view of disgust, the art community would have less incentive to use sex as their medium.
What "Fresh til Death" shoud understand is that artists crave contriversy, so complaining about what he hates in art will only help the prosparity of the art form.
why not ask Black Sabbath how well they did after enough christians started bitching?
HammerTard 3 months ago
In a broader sense, Leroy's kinda got himself a point. We don't need sex to pervade absolutely everything. There are other things and it does piss me off that our media uses sex as a vehicle for selling us, what is basically, shit. Our films, music, tv, magazines, newspapers.. they're all shit but nothing sells like a naked body.. and we buy it because we're immature fucking morons who don't understand how we're being scammed
zaphod67uk 3 months ago 16
@zaphod67uk not sure about your terminology (the profusion of "profanity" concerns me as well) but otherwise, I agree with you 1000%
ShawDAMAN 2 months ago
@zaphod67uk hey you clicked on this video so apparrently it works
XxHornet21zxX 2 months ago
uhh?????
788cami 3 months ago
Brb, going to molest models.
OriginSilentSuicide 3 months ago
lol they had this during Nuit Blanche last year in Toronto....it felt weird going trough those naked people =~= they were at the exit door so everyone had to go through.
cherriobu 3 months ago
I liked his accent so I'm not gon' rip this
TranquiloCielo 3 months ago
what a douche bag, boom!
curttota 3 months ago
nigga smoke a blunt and get lost in a bag of cheetos... I think this guy is just pissed off because he's a hermaphrodite
BarioAntonelli 3 months ago
ahaahahahahaha open your tv show angry nigga :D
saltibarsciai 3 months ago
he has right ti have hes opinion on something..and i have the same opinion....its just grossss ew!
BrokenWindoWx3 3 months ago
Where is this museum you speak of and how do I get there?
Gordack007 3 months ago
i can hardly understand what this guy is babbling about...
UNDERLANDSOUNDS 3 months ago
It's society that made us change. and the cold weather.
anubisloki76 3 months ago
lost of sexual control? maybe for yourself?
craigrbnyc 3 months ago
This man obviously doesn't understand the concept of performance art. So does he think a nude painting or sculpture is perverted too? Probably not.
00bilz 3 months ago
society made it that our natural body its self is shown differently.... people dont know how to handle the naked form and abuses it.... art can be anything and the natural body is art....
haleyarnold 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out the great guitarist and other weird shit a MEGASIXMILLION, and please SUBSCRIBE!!!!!
MegaSixmillion 3 months ago
"BOOM NAKED."
imOctoberSnow 3 months ago
definitely not art. michaelangelo is art
zebra4593 3 months ago
ya, scary and stupid.
bgrossish 3 months ago
Your question is its own answer. Nude doesn't mean "free to grope." It's not the fault of those who are nude, but the infantile people who don't know how to behave. The inappropriate actions of those visiting the installation speak to the need for it to continue. If you're child doesn't know what the parts are, you've got larger problems than them seeing someone nude. Better they see nude people than violence.
Ontir 3 months ago
I'm naked right now.
bustermk2 3 months ago
"The whole society is getting so highly sexed." This doesn't make any sense. I saw this exhibit was making sex and nudity feel natural. It was disturbing but comforting.
soaringyak 3 months ago
@soaringyak that does make sense, retard
UltimateConnor 3 months ago
I was there for that exhibit. It was set in a back room, and you didn't have to go near the nude people. They put up a false wall inside the room- you could go through the doorway in one end of the wall with the nude people, or go to the opposite end of the wall where there was a Non Nude Person doorway. And that was hardly the most disturbing piece in that exhibit or at the MOMA that day.
SovereignSoil 3 months ago 2
pobre weon
MrCristiaan 3 months ago
only sexy girls make nudity beautiful lets keep it that way.
HyPeRtRaXps3 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yo Bob!! Nobody wants to see your ugly face, show the real thing.
chrisvene123 3 months ago
The human body is not perverted.
me25422 3 months ago
If nudity is so beautiful I want to know how maney fat models are in the show?
wallcrawler2020 3 months ago
OK, this guy is just an idiot...i see that now
pfive 3 months ago
|
|
v
WatchMeFMyDrunkGirl 3 months ago
You have created NUDE pieces?? Art, like some jokes, isn't always going to be understood by everyone. Truthfully I am a bit jealous because it is such a great piece of work. It is very thought provoking and made to stir you down to the core unless you just see two naked people. This style is what I want to create, not paintings of pretty flowers and sunshine and green grass. Look back at some of the more famous artists, sure there are pretty flower paintings but there is also the abnormal.
slickredrocket 3 months ago
im thinking that this is the guy that gave sasha baron cohen the idea for ali g lolol
MmmmCanadaDry 3 months ago
@freshtildeathonline do you know the artist? the reason for putting there these two nude models as to deal with the problematicy of the limits between fiction and reality, it's called parafiction and has nothing to do with nudity itself, in this case nudity is just a problem presented to the public and it could have been something else (this is not her only work). Here nudity has nothing sexual, nothing social, nothing pornographic, it is just helping to present the problem of truth and reality.
Uomodelgiapp0ne 3 months ago
It will be banned if it's in my country though . we once had a crazy couple from about few years back , they walk totally naked in the streets just for advertisement
And it become our first headline in our country
To me .. there's nothing wrong naked , it's just depend on how you look and think about it .
Naked is art sure it is , if you don't think it until a lewd way of art .
Sex also an art ,
Homo Sapiens are once naked too .
Even animals are naked , meaning they're pervert ? XD
TanJianWei92 3 months ago
The funny part is he doesn't mention (or realize) the fact that the piece, Imponderabilia, was first performed in the 1970's. Unless Abramovic knew decades ago that her work would start destroying American society now.
Nuathi 3 months ago
and and and and and and and and
anniebaker101 3 months ago
Nobody is forced to do anything here!