These old 302's do sound badass but I don't hear they much since they're always behind me lol. They are pretty slow compared to more modern cars that people take out onto the street. They are just outdated now, and their time to shine has come and gone.
@fullmetaljacktt Government Motors lol that's pretty good... that just means GM built a better car than Ford yet again after having to COMPLETELY REDESIGN the Camaro ON A BUDGET after a 6 year period of not having made a single Camaro. Again, they decided to go with an older engine design instead of using the OHC design like Ford and they still perform better. Sure the GT outruns the SS but that's because of power-weight. It's cheaper to make a a car lighter than to add more power hahaaaaa.
@need2speed94 you guys have 74 more cubic inches and only make 14 more hp...when are you chevy guys going to stop hating on the mustangs? Back the 90s when chevy had 350s in their zs and were using a 3:73 rear end gear and comparing them to mustang gts that were 302s or even worse 281s using 3:08 or 3:27 gears you guys were loving it...now you are gonna hate on ford for making a nice muscle car...you still have the zl1 camaro coming out so stop whining...
@fullmetaljacktt Yes we are making more HP... like I stated off of older technology. Ford dropped the pushrod motor hoping to get a technological advantage over GM with the OHC design... that didn't do JACK SHIT lol. Just made their motor's heavier and very over-anticipated. I like GM, but I would have LOVED to see Ford keep the pushrod design like GM did and just make improvements. I mean the Windsor was a good motor at the time, imagine if they had kept it and improved it?
@need2speed94 you are making 14 more hp with 74 more cubic inches...you act like thats impressive lol...i too would love to see a 351w stuffed in the mustangs but for some reason what we want never happens
@fullmetaljacktt And we are also outperforming boosted Ford motors on all motor XD. LS1 f bodies can hit high 12s in bone stock form. No Ford from the 90's can ever dream about that. And stop talking about HP. HP is not nearly as important a torque. HP sells the car and gets idiots like you to become attracted to a vehicle. But out racing, torque is what wins the race. And for the 351w, thats a decent motor... except it can only hold maybe 500hp before you have problems. Crappy 2 bolt mains.
@need2speed94 its according to what you call bone stock...there are 5.0s that hit in the 12s and even elevens with nothing but bolt ons and n/a so i dont know what you are talking about. its still a 5.0 vs a 5.7...where are the chevy 5.0s? oh thats right they stopped making the 305 cause they were crap. What about the new 5.0? Thats what i am interested in. theres more to it then just hp and torque btw
@fullmetaljacktt Uhh I don't think a foxbody or SN95 5.0 could EVER hit 12s BONE STOCK you said bolt ons lol. *maybe the SN95 5.0 cobra, maybee. And yea, chevy made a smart decision to drop a motor that they thought wasnt good enough. Ford just used a new design that they thought was good and really wasn't lol. And yes the new GT 5.0s are very quick, you cant deny that. But the only reason they 'beat' the new SS is purely power - weight. I say its the IRS but who knows.
@need2speed94 a lot of people have a different opinion of stock. As far as i know the fbody zs where running mid to high 13s from the factory. I really never kept up with it because no one leaves their car stock anymore anyway. most drag racers prefer straight axle to irs..i like how you keep saying its purely power weight ratio...thats the whole point isn't it? the more you weigh the more power you need...it's chevys fault for making their car too heavy or not putting the power there to pull it
@fullmetaljacktt They can actually run anywhere from 12.9 to 14s in bad weather/high altitude and a bad driver lol. And yes straight axle is much better for straight line performance, that's why I don't like the new 5th gens at all. And all the IRS on the 5th gens does is weigh them down, because obviously it doesn't help a damn bit on that track hah, they blow for circuit racing. Power to weight is important, but its a lot cheaper to lose weight (what GM needs) than add power (what Ford needs).
@fullmetaljacktt really whens the last time you saw a corvette in a junk yard wheres fords big block motor yeah thank you then ford had that 4.6 junk please wheres your z06 or zr1 cause i know your dick gets hard evertime you see one faggit
@rocco23554346 lol rage some more...for 25k-40k more your corvette can outrun a gt500...congrats on the .7 of a second in the quarter mile you gained for 40k lmao
@rocco23554346 corvettes and mustangs...like apples and oranges...corvettes are nice no doubt ford doesnt market too much into the two seater lightweight cars unless you look at the ford gt. honestly im more impressed with the supra...can push 700+ hp on stock internals. I had an older camaro at one point. I will give it credit it was hard to break(at least the engine was). I am still waiting on the day ford and chevy make an awd camaro or mustang...that would be heaven
Imagine this... But slightly louder and a bit more of that "bad ass" exhaust sound. That's our Mustang. I seriously turn that shit on just to hear it. I don't know why but Mustangs and Firebirds sound amazing
@billy1427 What do you mean? 302 have no more torque than the 281's to my knowledge. Mustangs from mid 80s until around 2010 all had right at 300TQ give or take about 15? which 15 really makes no difference.
Damn, that sounds bad ass. I miss my '95, I may be getting one in a few days though thats a hard top. My last one was a vert and I didnt feel comfortable driving it. This hard top im looking at is bad ass though.
@mda21996 I have a foxbody coupe, and a 97 gt...to be honest, the 97 looks amazing while rolling, well its just looks better overall imo....but to each their own though lol
@mda21996 In terms of styling maybe...I happen to like them,I own a 95 as well as an 89 fox body coupe...all 79-04 mustangs basically share the same platform. However these cars are have a stiffer chassis albeit a bit heavier, and better braking.
Really not a bad option if you're looking for an inexpensive stang to play with.
Indeed they are. 94-95 are the best ones IMO, disc brakes, better suspension, still had the venerable 5.0 under the hood and oh so easy to work on. That sound.....made me go outside and start mine up just to hear it lol.
I just put a Bassani cat back with BX4840 mufflers on my LX 5.0.... I'm settin off car alarms with the stock catted H-pipe!!! Rattled off two cat heat shields already... Forget the SLP and Flowmaster...
its almost sounds like a ferrari f355,ive had 3 mustangs with different exhaust set ups,and nothing i had sounded that good. My fav was on my 88 vert jba shorties,bbk o/r h pipe into dynomax ultra-flow ss catbacks.
bassani muffs, o/r x-pipe, longtube headers. The o/r x-pipe and LT headers are mostly what gives it this unique sound. LTs are usually a bitch to put on, but they sound incredible.
bro that sounds sick dont sound stock though whats done to it obviously a cam but what kind i got the same car but its got a vortech on it what the brand name on the cam.
hey i watched this video and i love the sound of the stang, i have a 94 stang gt, and i wanted to know what kind of exhaust you have on it, and or what set up of a exhaust do u think is the loudest, and best sounding, all the way from headers back, i was thinking about pypes headers, and mid pipes and slp loudmouth II cat back but, if u think something is better could you hook me up and let me know. thanks
i read an articel in 50 mustangs magazine and they did a test with just bout all the mufflers, and the loudest was bassani.i have a 95 gt that is pretty loud, i went with bbk long tube headers off road h pipe and flowmasters with no tail pipes.i am switching over to an o/r x pipe and bassani cat back though.bassani catback is expensive $700.
I'm almost certain, as far as exhaust goes, this guy has Bassani. There's another video of a 95GT that installed Bassani exhaust, and besides the Cam lope, it sounds remarkably similar.
I would love to get a 94 or 95 mustang with the 302 and bore and stroke it out to a 347. 347s are good for about 350 horses. Plus that body style is the best looking to me.
The 5 speed Fox cars were not that slow but the AOD cars were dogs. The first time i took my 91GT AOD to the track it was stock except an k&n filter and it went 16.0s. Thats slower than a civic at least the one I raced. I will never forget that night. That was the beginning of my addiction to summit racing.
where did you get these stats? b/c they're ass wrong. the 96-98s with the non pi motor only made 215-225 hp at the flywheel (dont know torque off the top of my head. the 99-04 with the pi motor made 260 horse and 305 torque. i dont know what the 5.0's made but in stock form they're fuckin slow.
this video makes me want to buy a 95
emericask822 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
look up the snakebite cobra...if you want to hear one that sounds great
fullmetaljacktt 4 months ago
These old 302's do sound badass but I don't hear they much since they're always behind me lol. They are pretty slow compared to more modern cars that people take out onto the street. They are just outdated now, and their time to shine has come and gone.
need2speed94 4 months ago
just like a honda all pipe no motor trans am baby
rocco23554346 5 months ago
@rocco23554346 wheres pontiac now? you can kepp your Government Motors vehicles i will stick to ford
fullmetaljacktt 4 months ago
@fullmetaljacktt Government Motors lol that's pretty good... that just means GM built a better car than Ford yet again after having to COMPLETELY REDESIGN the Camaro ON A BUDGET after a 6 year period of not having made a single Camaro. Again, they decided to go with an older engine design instead of using the OHC design like Ford and they still perform better. Sure the GT outruns the SS but that's because of power-weight. It's cheaper to make a a car lighter than to add more power hahaaaaa.
need2speed94 4 months ago
@need2speed94 you guys have 74 more cubic inches and only make 14 more hp...when are you chevy guys going to stop hating on the mustangs? Back the 90s when chevy had 350s in their zs and were using a 3:73 rear end gear and comparing them to mustang gts that were 302s or even worse 281s using 3:08 or 3:27 gears you guys were loving it...now you are gonna hate on ford for making a nice muscle car...you still have the zl1 camaro coming out so stop whining...
fullmetaljacktt 4 months ago
@fullmetaljacktt Yes we are making more HP... like I stated off of older technology. Ford dropped the pushrod motor hoping to get a technological advantage over GM with the OHC design... that didn't do JACK SHIT lol. Just made their motor's heavier and very over-anticipated. I like GM, but I would have LOVED to see Ford keep the pushrod design like GM did and just make improvements. I mean the Windsor was a good motor at the time, imagine if they had kept it and improved it?
need2speed94 4 months ago
@need2speed94 you are making 14 more hp with 74 more cubic inches...you act like thats impressive lol...i too would love to see a 351w stuffed in the mustangs but for some reason what we want never happens
fullmetaljacktt 4 months ago
@fullmetaljacktt And we are also outperforming boosted Ford motors on all motor XD. LS1 f bodies can hit high 12s in bone stock form. No Ford from the 90's can ever dream about that. And stop talking about HP. HP is not nearly as important a torque. HP sells the car and gets idiots like you to become attracted to a vehicle. But out racing, torque is what wins the race. And for the 351w, thats a decent motor... except it can only hold maybe 500hp before you have problems. Crappy 2 bolt mains.
need2speed94 4 months ago
@need2speed94 its according to what you call bone stock...there are 5.0s that hit in the 12s and even elevens with nothing but bolt ons and n/a so i dont know what you are talking about. its still a 5.0 vs a 5.7...where are the chevy 5.0s? oh thats right they stopped making the 305 cause they were crap. What about the new 5.0? Thats what i am interested in. theres more to it then just hp and torque btw
fullmetaljacktt 4 months ago
@fullmetaljacktt Uhh I don't think a foxbody or SN95 5.0 could EVER hit 12s BONE STOCK you said bolt ons lol. *maybe the SN95 5.0 cobra, maybee. And yea, chevy made a smart decision to drop a motor that they thought wasnt good enough. Ford just used a new design that they thought was good and really wasn't lol. And yes the new GT 5.0s are very quick, you cant deny that. But the only reason they 'beat' the new SS is purely power - weight. I say its the IRS but who knows.
need2speed94 4 months ago
@need2speed94 a lot of people have a different opinion of stock. As far as i know the fbody zs where running mid to high 13s from the factory. I really never kept up with it because no one leaves their car stock anymore anyway. most drag racers prefer straight axle to irs..i like how you keep saying its purely power weight ratio...thats the whole point isn't it? the more you weigh the more power you need...it's chevys fault for making their car too heavy or not putting the power there to pull it
fullmetaljacktt 4 months ago
@fullmetaljacktt They can actually run anywhere from 12.9 to 14s in bad weather/high altitude and a bad driver lol. And yes straight axle is much better for straight line performance, that's why I don't like the new 5th gens at all. And all the IRS on the 5th gens does is weigh them down, because obviously it doesn't help a damn bit on that track hah, they blow for circuit racing. Power to weight is important, but its a lot cheaper to lose weight (what GM needs) than add power (what Ford needs).
need2speed94 4 months ago
@fullmetaljacktt well good point but you see all ford racers using chevy motors but you will never caught a chevy guy using a ford motors
rocco23554346 4 months ago
@rocco23554346 because chevy is cheap to build and parts are easier to find
fullmetaljacktt 4 months ago
@rocco23554346 maybe its because the fords are still running and the chevys are in the junk yard waiting to be parted lol
fullmetaljacktt 4 months ago
@fullmetaljacktt really whens the last time you saw a corvette in a junk yard wheres fords big block motor yeah thank you then ford had that 4.6 junk please wheres your z06 or zr1 cause i know your dick gets hard evertime you see one faggit
rocco23554346 4 months ago
@rocco23554346 lol rage some more...for 25k-40k more your corvette can outrun a gt500...congrats on the .7 of a second in the quarter mile you gained for 40k lmao
fullmetaljacktt 4 months ago
@fullmetaljacktt corvette been on top for how many years
rocco23554346 4 months ago
@rocco23554346 corvettes and mustangs...like apples and oranges...corvettes are nice no doubt ford doesnt market too much into the two seater lightweight cars unless you look at the ford gt. honestly im more impressed with the supra...can push 700+ hp on stock internals. I had an older camaro at one point. I will give it credit it was hard to break(at least the engine was). I am still waiting on the day ford and chevy make an awd camaro or mustang...that would be heaven
fullmetaljacktt 4 months ago
Mustangs suck.
camlacen 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@camlacen yet here you are on a mustang video!
elmestengo 4 months ago
@camlacen haters gonna hate
fullmetaljacktt 4 months ago
very very nice.
Emaster255 6 months ago
just shit myself after he flew by fuh
Patron1520 7 months ago
not the best at all...
mustang are the shit any so dont matter
MustangWinsEveryTime 8 months ago
I miss my 94 and 95 mustangs. Im rocking a 07 mustang nowadays
pdogg619 8 months ago
I want that sound
tdj8686 9 months ago
hey can you get the same sound out of a 289?
dantwangotell 9 months ago
Such a Beautiful sound
DoomSayerxxXx 9 months ago
Really nice car, awesome sound, nice neighborhood.
95stangdude 10 months ago
vtec kick in yo
itsmacki 10 months ago
burninrock24 10 months ago
That is the nicest I've heard, which Bassani's are they?
bligrigs 11 months ago
people saying this is slow dont realize that hes not going full throttle till hes infront of the camera. and thats pretty damn fast.
burninrock24 11 months ago
@burninrock24 People saying its slow probably don't have any fast cars of their own. I know I don't, just have two slow trucks.
95beretta 10 months ago
as to the post about the 5.0s having more torque then the 4.6 is entirely wrong the newer 5.0s have more torque yes but as for the older ones no
hero24787 11 months ago
@hero24787 Of course. Ford wouldn't take a step backwards now would they?
Chrislav7 10 months ago
God damn it!!! that does sound nice.......good stuff
vagasduke 11 months ago
Imagine this... But slightly louder and a bit more of that "bad ass" exhaust sound. That's our Mustang. I seriously turn that shit on just to hear it. I don't know why but Mustangs and Firebirds sound amazing
headshot992 11 months ago
Yes, the 2011 5.0 IS king
AJballer 11 months ago
I "hear" and exhaust modification ticket coming.
jaimemgn 1 year ago
hope a kid on a bike doesnt pop out...
19baitmaster51 1 year ago
looks slow as shit i bet my 250 ninja could out run that LOL.
06yellow250ninja 1 year ago
@06yellow250ninja ive seen a 250 ninja get beat by a v6 mustang with light mods. highly doubt your PoS ninja 250 would be a badass mustang like this
TheZohaun 1 year ago
this video never gets old i just wish he would kept going at full throttle
byronbja 1 year ago
pussy compared to any chevy
bjsniffitproductions 1 year ago
i'm a much larger fan of the 4.6 modular motor. the old 5.0's have horrid stock numbers to bother with.. 99-04 is my favorite stang body style
person3213 1 year ago
THIS IDIOT SAYING 95 WAS A 4.6????WTF??? BUY UR SELF A BETTLE AND SHUT@#^^$UP U AZZ FACE D1K SAKA MATHA FACA
capones1000 1 year ago
@capones1000 You should buy Rosetta Stone and learn how to talk, write, and type in English.
reverseoreo08 1 year ago
i have a mod motor car and i'd rather have a 5.0 any damn day. think i'll get a 94-95. good balance there.
knucklehead0202 1 year ago
im sorry i disagree 4.6 modular motors are alot bertter then those p.o.s 5.0s
SpmStompsAll 1 year ago
@SpmStompsAll you gotta give credit to the pushrod motor and hauls ass for a little motor...
FoxBodyMike87 1 year ago
@SpmStompsAll too bad 4.6's dont have the torque 5.0's do.
billy1427 1 year ago 9
This has been flagged as spam show
@billy1427 yeah you're right, they have more.
Ploxe149 10 months ago
@billy1427 What do you mean? 302 have no more torque than the 281's to my knowledge. Mustangs from mid 80s until around 2010 all had right at 300TQ give or take about 15? which 15 really makes no difference.
SuRihtanil 9 months ago
@SuRihtanil your right, all though dont the 5.0's produce their torque a lot sooner than 4.6's?
billy1427 9 months ago
@billy1427 Yeah I know the foxbody GT reach maximum TQ before the 99-04 Mustang GT not sure about the rest.
SuRihtanil 9 months ago
@SuRihtanil My dad has a '06 and I've driven it. It just doesnt have that snappy feel like the pushrod motor unless your way high in rpms.
billy1427 9 months ago
@billy1427 Yep, you are correct the 2011 5.0s have more torque than the 4.6L.
FixFalcon 7 months ago 3
@billy1427 lol
leonardbullhock 4 months ago
@SpmStompsAll
You sir are wrong.. Good day
ThunderMonarch 1 year ago
Damn, that sounds bad ass. I miss my '95, I may be getting one in a few days though thats a hard top. My last one was a vert and I didnt feel comfortable driving it. This hard top im looking at is bad ass though.
bradlyw420 1 year ago
this is the worst model of mustangs imo
mda21996 1 year ago
@mda21996 I have a foxbody coupe, and a 97 gt...to be honest, the 97 looks amazing while rolling, well its just looks better overall imo....but to each their own though lol
Bigswole408 1 year ago
@mda21996 In terms of styling maybe...I happen to like them,I own a 95 as well as an 89 fox body coupe...all 79-04 mustangs basically share the same platform. However these cars are have a stiffer chassis albeit a bit heavier, and better braking.
Really not a bad option if you're looking for an inexpensive stang to play with.
Good luck!
Johnny5liter 1 year ago
@mda21996 i would the mid to late 70's are the worst. 94 and 95 gave you new styling with the 5.0 which is cool. I am still a 99-04 fan.
VetteKiller2002 1 year ago
@mda21996 them and .74-78...then came the real deal :D fox body's from 79-93 :D
Pl0xor 1 year ago
@mda21996 why?
trp350 1 year ago
sounds like eleanor when u boot it :)
carsnwomen91 1 year ago
i have a 06 gt lowered 2 inches cammed twin turbo headers magnaflow and it runs like a mutha
PsnBradyIsBeastly 1 year ago
gotta love the mustang!!
ernestolopez23 1 year ago
Helllllll yeah that sounds good, especially during the drive-by at the end.
supersnakeGT 1 year ago
Its not my car and the exhaust combo was put in the tags. LT Headers, DR GAS O/R X and Bassani Mufflers.
s4rge 1 year ago
not bad man does sound good
itsavibething 1 year ago
that sounds soooo good! sounds like an o/r h and 1 chamber flows?
cumsludge2 1 year ago
sounds good man. What mufflers? u cant reply to noone elses questions? they asked at least 3 times ANSWER MAN!
TravisCadello 1 year ago
That's one of the baddest sounding stangs i have heard!...its Nasty as they come!..Dont pay no attention to the hater's!
spawn42 1 year ago
yeah what kind of exhaust
brandonmikes 1 year ago
what kind of exhaust you got on there?
MrBraydonD 1 year ago
damn lol all that sound but yet still not really moving:/ what a shame
bens08LS7 1 year ago
yeah, i checked out you page and your vidoes show you and your really fast car. lol what a joke.
CATZR600BRAAAAAP 1 year ago
@DaNasty24
nope
pcmasterfilms 1 year ago
really noce mustang check out mine
TheDylan222222 1 year ago
its a shame that is the ugliest body style mustang there is =\, but of course its sounds amazing
pcmasterfilms 2 years ago
@pcmasterfilms
that is one of the best looking bodys.....
DaNasty24 1 year ago
Indeed they are. 94-95 are the best ones IMO, disc brakes, better suspension, still had the venerable 5.0 under the hood and oh so easy to work on. That sound.....made me go outside and start mine up just to hear it lol.
trellabor 1 year ago
@pcmasterfilms false... the mustang 2 and the fox body's..... but at least the fox bodies were cool
itsafloater 1 year ago
looks like a nasty storm is about to roll in.....lol car sounds awesome too
Mudddrider108 2 years ago
Sounds like shit.
If shit was gold with diamonds.
I LOVE IT!! 5 Stars.
iceguy2003 2 years ago 2
fuck yea man
50jofa 2 years ago
5*s. SOUNDS NICE
best17driver 2 years ago
this car is not as fast as it sounds, but still is very nice
parkerpawn 2 years ago
This car belongs to Killer95Stang
Exhaust:
Mac L/T
Dr Gas X (no cats)
Bassani BX Street Comp's
He has the vid posted himself watch?v=Z2fwBTw8eMo
Stock 302 short block, Neil Erickson race ported gt40p heads, Neil Erickson custom cam, and Edelbrock RPM intake.
308 rwhp 315tq N/A
LoveThyPitBull 2 years ago 2
@LoveThyPitBull.. funny how this person posted it first!
604KINGfiveohh 2 years ago
agree sound nice.
radee2000 2 years ago
mustangs owns all .. fosho ! :)
acegt500 2 years ago
what exhaust is he running?
Thrash3rSkateRock 2 years ago
FUCKING SICK!!!!!!!!!
PB0Y183 2 years ago
sounds great man.
luisn612 2 years ago
W!!T!!F!! Awsome
MehrLeistung 2 years ago
Sounds like its running under water!
assman871 2 years ago 2
like that revving at :53!
bigu 2 years ago
for sure its not the best my friends cobra is the best now that car sounds x10 better than this car.
Mustangxkillsxcamaro 2 years ago
sounds like a bassani catback, maybe o/r x and lt's
HomelessGuy40 2 years ago
what's your setup?
guitargod834 2 years ago
uh, honestly i think mine sounds alot better and I am not even trying to bragg, tranny sounds good though!!
jayboe28 2 years ago
a great and particular sound!!!! nice dude!
TommasoCompiani 2 years ago
sounds like all the ones in my hood
559Redd559 2 years ago
whats so unique of this mustang, sounds the same as all the once i see
PinpinKALI559 2 years ago
shifting sounds so smooth like aaaaaa niceeee
tyler12221 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my video responce thats a good sounding stang boys
chipcomandr 2 years ago
nice sound!! nice car!
boozer95 2 years ago
what mufflers/headers are you runnin
Alex071171 2 years ago
I know doesn't that just pop up immediately?
hellfire0990 2 years ago
sounds like a beast.
o0STANG0o 2 years ago
That sounds like a nascar going by!
hellfire0990 2 years ago 13
thats exactly wat went through mi head
howtomakeagirlgowow 2 years ago
@hellfire0990 haha thats bassani for you.
CudiZone11 1 year ago
I just put a Bassani cat back with BX4840 mufflers on my LX 5.0.... I'm settin off car alarms with the stock catted H-pipe!!! Rattled off two cat heat shields already... Forget the SLP and Flowmaster...
kjrm6796 2 years ago
video? i'm gettin ready to do the same with my coupe..only with a OR x pipe.
SlyFox87gt 2 years ago
Yeah, it's pretty cool to set off car alarms like a redneck while simultaneously rattling things off your car..
2k3SteedaGT 2 years ago
i'll own 1 i swear it !!
ezcondition 2 years ago
yo tht car soundss mean
MustangCobra86 2 years ago
what kind of bassani cat back is that because im running flowmaster 10 series an im looking to change so any feed back would be great
rmoore94gt 2 years ago
its almost sounds like a ferrari f355,ive had 3 mustangs with different exhaust set ups,and nothing i had sounded that good. My fav was on my 88 vert jba shorties,bbk o/r h pipe into dynomax ultra-flow ss catbacks.
jaysayershuh 2 years ago
i meant to say at high rpm's it sounds like an f355 slightly
jaysayershuh 2 years ago
Damn! I wish my '94 Stang sounded like this. But alas, it is a V6.
JavonteTreble 2 years ago
that sounds like some nascar type shit homie
stangin209 2 years ago
That sounds great best audio yet on u-tube, guy workig camer good audio
nascar2w 2 years ago
What cam does it have????
sergstang302 2 years ago
That sounds scary man =)! awesome
Chris11Stang 2 years ago
sounds normal, sounds like trash.
IndyRamMan 2 years ago
what mufflers do you have on it?
knoedlerd 2 years ago
bassani muffs, o/r x-pipe, longtube headers. The o/r x-pipe and LT headers are mostly what gives it this unique sound. LTs are usually a bitch to put on, but they sound incredible.
88e303stanggt 2 years ago
Hey, what kind of exhaust is on that mustang?
bryoung09 2 years ago
that thing sounds sick , nice cam lope ,thats the sound im goin for outa my 94 bird but i dont think im gonna get close to it with a 4.6
m0dthunder 3 years ago
That sounds amazing!
W3NXTR3M3 3 years ago
sounds like a fuckin 408...
davidluceIII 3 years ago
sounds incredible!
93CobraKid 3 years ago
bro that sounds sick dont sound stock though whats done to it obviously a cam but what kind i got the same car but its got a vortech on it what the brand name on the cam.
1quick94gt 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Defenitely not the best...sounds like a v6
ryno89077711 3 years ago
ha ha ha dont know your cars do you? thats a 5.0......no V6 sounds that good......whats the matter with you?
twinturbocobra 3 years ago 9
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i've heard better, but sounds decent
tamaninja00 3 years ago
Bassani and off road X (no cats) It will not sound the same with catalytic converters
s4rge 3 years ago
I actually think I found a video that beats out this Stang's sound, or at least matches the level of awesome.
In the search bar, type in:
5.0 Mustang Cammed Magnaflow
Click the first one, and watch it. I can't decide which exhaust package to put on my car, both sound SO fucking sick.
veritech102 3 years ago
NA, the other one sounds good dnt get me wrong! but this... dam... this is beautiful! hahaha im tryin to fnd the same set up 4 mine
ChiHuAz08 3 years ago
Bet dudeman gets pulled over DAILY!
Its a crime to sound so good.
wDawks 3 years ago
hey i watched this video and i love the sound of the stang, i have a 94 stang gt, and i wanted to know what kind of exhaust you have on it, and or what set up of a exhaust do u think is the loudest, and best sounding, all the way from headers back, i was thinking about pypes headers, and mid pipes and slp loudmouth II cat back but, if u think something is better could you hook me up and let me know. thanks
ThaTank07 3 years ago
i read an articel in 50 mustangs magazine and they did a test with just bout all the mufflers, and the loudest was bassani.i have a 95 gt that is pretty loud, i went with bbk long tube headers off road h pipe and flowmasters with no tail pipes.i am switching over to an o/r x pipe and bassani cat back though.bassani catback is expensive $700.
stangmike666 3 years ago
Awesome sound dude, I have a friend with a Cobra R and, man, it sounds frikkin awesome when you rev a takeoff, I love it. Nice!
purplecooky 3 years ago
that thing sounds sick. what kind of exhaust?
HondaRiderCR250 3 years ago 6
Damn man that thing sounded nasty going down the road when you opened it up. Cam sounds really good too, what else you got done to it?
impalass07 3 years ago
earlier models did infact have the 5.0L.
RyanH0000 3 years ago 5
nice mustang you should check mine out
dmayfield2 3 years ago
Wow, that and one of the tags is Bassani. Haha.
veritech102 3 years ago
I'm almost certain, as far as exhaust goes, this guy has Bassani. There's another video of a 95GT that installed Bassani exhaust, and besides the Cam lope, it sounds remarkably similar.
veritech102 3 years ago
this vid got the right title!
muscle1983 3 years ago 7
sweet stang dude how much power wre the 94-95 5.0 layn down
astyleinc 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
sn95 mustangs don't have 5.0L they had the 4.6
Thunderjet429 3 years ago
actually 94 and 95 have 5.0 genieus. Do some research!
JM1991StangGT 3 years ago 20
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ford stopped putting 5.0's in mustangs in 92 retard.
shaklakan 3 years ago
actually 1995 was the last year for the 5.0
aegismachina 3 years ago 4
your a dumbass you must be a chevy fan, well youll fit right in with them!
JM1991StangGT 3 years ago 2
the 5.0 was in mustang gt's till 95. i know, i have one..
mustangnixon351 3 years ago
I would love to get a 94 or 95 mustang with the 302 and bore and stroke it out to a 347. 347s are good for about 350 horses. Plus that body style is the best looking to me.
travelszdredneck 3 years ago
@travelszdredneck
your way wrong that a 347 is only good for 350 horse
seantylerwray 1 year ago
The 5 speed Fox cars were not that slow but the AOD cars were dogs. The first time i took my 91GT AOD to the track it was stock except an k&n filter and it went 16.0s. Thats slower than a civic at least the one I raced. I will never forget that night. That was the beginning of my addiction to summit racing.
gresco150 3 years ago
sweet
americanmadeZ06 3 years ago
the 1987-1993 5.0's were 215 hp/ 300 ft/lbs
the 1996-1998 4.6's were 240 hp/240 ft/lbs
the 1999-2004 gt's were 260 hp/ 260 ft/lbs
the 2005-current gt's are 300 hp/ 310 ft/lbs
now the foxbodies 87-93 5.0's made the least amount of peak horsepower, but were the lightest and therefor the quickest 0-60 except for the new ones.
nicyousuckk 3 years ago
actually the 1987-1988 with speed density were rated at 225hp,when they went to Mass Air in 1989 they dropped to 215hp.
beebee455 3 years ago
where did you get these stats? b/c they're ass wrong. the 96-98s with the non pi motor only made 215-225 hp at the flywheel (dont know torque off the top of my head. the 99-04 with the pi motor made 260 horse and 305 torque. i dont know what the 5.0's made but in stock form they're fuckin slow.
chefalan23 3 years ago