Added: 2 years ago
From: louwrentius
Views: 37,825
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (22)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What system is this? IBM, HP, or Dell? That's massive!

  • hes got all his porn backed up on there

  • About as fun as watching paint dry

  • only 1GB/s?

    I had 550MB from four 500GB SATA Barracuda drives. However, in mdadm RAID0.

    RAID6 is very CPU-intensive. Go with RAID10, suppose to have higher write rates.

    I've tested it on 12 drives, in best scenario 1/2 of them (six) can die, leaving data unaffected, depending on which will be dead. In the worst - only two.

    As You can see there is rebuliding rate limit (200MB/s), can be check at:

    /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit­_max

    and

    /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit­_min

    You can change this.

  • Dear TomTeneg,

    1. RAID 10 : if the wrong 2 drives fail you loose all data. RAID6 doesn't have this risk.

    2. What is more important for a home NAS: speed or storage capacity?

    3. Your comment about rebuilding rate limiting is irrelevant as this limit is not reached.

    Oh and,

    "Only 1 GB/s?"

    Come again?

  • @louwrentius Bet he never reached 1gbps on his consumer grade setup with fake raid, wish he told us something we didn't already know...

  • @TomTeneg "RAID6 is very CPU-intensive" yeah duh... Thats why we use 500+ a pop dedicated raid controllers instead of those cheap ass fake onboard raid support you got 4 free with your consumer grade motherboard.

    Go with raid 10 when you are poor and don't have the bucks to buy decent dedicated raid controllers.

  • Him comparing raid 0 with raid 6 setups only in terms of speed is just plain moronic.

  • @TomTeneg With regards to your own private porn library it is indeed recommended to prefer the i/o of onboard raid 0 instead of the reliability and redundancy of a dedicated raid 6 setup.

  • Looks like it's about to fall off the desk. So much for data protection...

  • Comment removed

  • Looks good, give it another try using the "nmon" utility.

    I think it gives a better visualization of what's happening with the disks.

    I also like how you can "group" disks as a logical device.

  • No wonder it failed there's a Apple sticker on the monitor ! lol just kidding nice setup

  • Looks good :) what are the complete specs?

  • Yes this is possible, but it will take about 20 times 5 hours = 100 hours excluding overhead. It will take weeks.

  • I have a good question here. If you want to rebuild that array to a larger one. Can you rebuild it by failing one drive at a time and replacing it with a larger capacity drive. Then rebuilding the array after earch new drive replacement??

  • 5 hours..... 18 tb...raid 6.

    20 drives.....gotta be 1 tb drives right? .9 capacity?

    I'm thinking of building a raid 6 array.

    2 fails at once baby!

  • Norco rpc-4020

  • What case is that in?

  • A rebuild takes about 5 hours, without any load.

  • NICE! Whats the rebuild time?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more