Added: 2 years ago
From: Best0fScience
Views: 12,735
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (173)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • there are still so much to discovery in the above the sky! Old tech gadgets are stlil useful now a days! Nice beautiful sights above.

  • what is there to dislike about this? this is reality...

  • im so trippin

  • New telescopes first image has returned..."Well, it appears to be Morgan Freeman looking into a snow-globe.

  • They say nothing can travel at the speed of light. That is true. "Nothing" is something, and it CAN travel at the speed of light. At the birth of the universe, they universe expanded faster than the speed of light, therefore that explains that the universe was created from nothing, and it is still expanding to this day. There are three theories about the universe... Big Bang, Big Crunch, and the Steady State. In a way, all three of them happened at the beginning of the known universe.

  • @cjalmighty ...?????????

  • @supergiuovane Lol ya just gotta look into these things. Think of Nothing as an object. Nothing can go the speed of light. Get it?

  • @cjalmighty Yes. speculative philosophy with nothing to do with science.

  • gods not real so screw you people god must have existed but he has not created anything nor did anyone else life itself took it's course and gods a mith space is sooooooo amazing!!!!!

  • "Look at the stars in the sky. Some of them had their light extinguished for millions of years, yet their light is only reaching us now"

    Like ghosts. it's kinda sad...

  • @LordMorningStar

    I agree completely, if only television provided more educational channels and informative shows...but alas, it is but a reflection of what the majority is attracted to, which is entertainment.

  • get direct tv. their programming offers a wide variety of choices suited to variety of interests.

  • The universe could be collapsing on itself and we wouldn't even know it...

  • Thank you for the video! I wish we could be seeing this on TV instead of all the garbage there...

    A+

  • exactly all i see on t.v is religion news and shit shows.....southpark is an exception but i don't watch it on t.v due to it's time schedule

  • this sunday history is starting its "tour through the universe" series.. I thinks it starting with Saturn, u should check it out,

  • They are so cute :3

  • @Fragamuff Pedo bear seal of approval.

  • Soooo... How did those galaxies get there 800 million years after the Big Bang? If nothing goes faster than the speed of light, there's shouldn't be anything that far out that early after the Big Bang. I realize we're not at the center of the Universe, but if our solar system went in a directly opposite direction from those galaxies we just photographed, then it can't be farther than 6-7ish billion light years from the center of the Universe...

    Never mind. I just gave myself a migraine.

  • @TomRCJ there's exceptions to " faster than the speed of light ". infact light changes speed all the time. pretty interesting stuff.

  • looooooooool

  • Increible en minuto y medio han hecho un muy buen video de los principios de las galaxias

  • @CLRubyHypatia; Atheism is gathering momentum with the interwebs! Have you seen the Agora movie yet? It's about Hypatia, starring Rachel Weiss, apprently showing how christian mobs went on a rampage, destroying everything they saw as

    'pagan' and the atrocity they did to your namesake. I've been waiting to see it for months but it seems to have vanished an isn't listed in any cinema I can find, in England anyway.

  • a rachel weisz movie will search for asap

  • In 1532 Copernicus published his book showing that the earth orbited the sun and not the other way round as christians believed. It took the Cathaholic church 379 years to admit it was wrong, so it didn't update it's views until 390 years after they were disproved.

  • Sorry, I got that wrong, it took 390 years for the church to admit it was wrong, which they finally did in 1922!

  • I still think that BestOfScience is affiliated with FFreethinker.

  • good!!!

  • Mankepanke is correct, it's counter intuitive but immensely important concerning relativity, and light.

  • Pfft... Everyone knows that god placed the light already on its way here so that it would APPEAR 13 billion years old...

    Lol, ok, I'm cracking up just typing that garbage. But seriously, I've heard them say that exact same thing before. Kind of funny, in a sad, terrifying way.

  • So if we were rapidly approaching one of these infant galaxies, would it hyper evolve as we drew closer to it? How would we see one of these galaxies if we were far enough to witness it's beginning stages as we grew exponentially closer?

  • No, since light speed is constant in any system of reference. It would take the same amount of time to reach us regardless of our velocity.

  • Comment removed

  • Someone asked about redshift (and then removed their comment). If someone is wondering the same thing: We get redshift not from relative velocity (as with sound in the Doppler effect), but instead from the light moving in space that is stretching. Since it's traveling for so long, the expansion of the universe gets apparent in the light so we can see it. Think of light as particles in a line instead of a wave for easier understanding. The distance between the "particles" would increase over time

  • I am not on a research grant from nuclear power, so have the freedom to speak TRUTH

  • Hubble shows the effect of interstallar matter on distant lgiht! We get a red shift, with no blue shifts out there!

  • Only the crazyt believe teh PR of nuclear power (GW) is real or sceince. I am too sane to listen!

  • speaking of galaxies, i think i'll go play some mass effect!

  • Same here... :D

  • nice!

  • I think you spend too much time fixating on astronomy and physics.  What about microbiology, geology, psychology and such?

  • @TruthfulChristian

    Complex and amazing things take complex and amazing explanations. Simply saying a creator did it explains nothing.

  • Stop being stupid or go back to your creationist vids.

  • You're incredibly stupid. Do Sunrises require a sunrise-making factory? Are there little elves inside crystals to arrange all of the molecules into their correct locations?

  • I like the little elves inside of crystals arranging all of the molecules into their correct locations. It makes my crystal seem magical with powers no one else knows about but me. Kind of like, I know its true, because I feel it in my heart. The sun just sits there spinning around on its own, because it was moved like a magic top by a giant cosmic hand.

  • I don't see what this has to do with my comment, but...

    Would that creator have to be complex and amazing as well? If so, then being complex and amazing, He would demand a creator. If, on the other hand, He is simple and bland, then amazing complexity can arise from bland simplicity which does not necessitate a creator.

  • The complexity and amazingness of the Creator demands a Creator. Unless God too evolved into God just as Humans evolved into Humans. Something cannot come from Nothing, if God created the universe from nothing this is a contradiction, if the universe always existed your god could have evolved from it thus he isn't eternal. Or then again God could have evolved only in the collective imagination of humans just like our other perceptions and ideas like Magic, Democracy, Fairies, Ego, etc...

  • Don't try to prove the truth value of God. You should admit it is just your choice of beliefs. Dogma by definition doesn't have to be proved. Doing rituals can create a strong feeling of actual fact. Keep that to yourself. But you are welcome to join us in the daylight.

  • I see that reading comprehension isn't your forté.

  • Who is giving me the thumbs down in my comment ? Is is the irrational believers in a bronze age god, or the Atheists with dismal reading comprehension?

  • lol i think some folks might have just read the first line and nothing else.

  • @xm377Moyocoyatzin, something can not come from nothing? You just questioned every scientist that believes in the Big Bag theory, if you spend a little more time, actually the rest of your lifetime you can learn that the more you learn the more questions you have...besides, theres no such thing as "nothing" is there? What would nothing be? We gave it a word so it has to be something...I suggest you read some of Dr. Michio Kaku's work, he can make people think twice about beliefs in general.

  • @KrautAttack78 The word "nothing" means "Lack of." So when we say there is nothing there we mean there is a lack of substance in that particular area. You use "nothing" in Mathematics as well: the number Zero. Now as to the big bang theory, that one you clearly need to look it up because nowhere does it state the Universe came from "nothing," the theory is that the Universe was at some point "crushed" to an incredibly small size before it went BANG! and exploded.

  • @xm377Moyocoyatzin , so then your saying that there has always been "something" and never "nothing"? Whats between galaxies and stars? We used to think it was nothing but empty vacuum but now we know better, theres dark matter that holds everything together and dark energy that pushes everything away, I just dont believe in "nothing".

  • @KrautAttack78 You don't "believe" in "nothing?" (o_0) That is on par with religionists who "believe" there is "something" like a god or a spirit or something out there that is running the whole show. Anyway, "nothing" is real but not in the way you are thinking. The only way you think "nothing" can't exist is because you think "nothing" is dependent on "something." That something HAS to exist and from there move to non-existence (nothingness). Something and Nothing are not co-dependent.

  • @xm377Moyocoyatzin, so there has always been something, where did it come from? Seriously...what is all of this stuff we see out there? It had to start somewhere sometime.

  • @KrautAttack78 We don't really know nor can we prove that everything "had to have come from somewhere, sometime."

  • @xm377Moyocoyatzinit had to come from somewhere sometime, right? What if were all like in that movie Avatar and the real "us" are sitting in a machine and everything we see is fake but we just dont know it yet?

  • @KrautAttack78 I think you mean that movie The Matrix. But now you are going into a deeper philosophical question. All I know is that based on science the Big Bang explains how the universe is acting today, it does not explain what happened or was happening before the big bang happened.

  • @xm377Moyocoyatzin, I dont know, I think were all in the Matrix

  • @xm377Moyocoyatzin, your getting into the human brain now, the human brain gathers 4 billion bits of information per second through the eyes and only processes 2,000 of these bits, so the question is what is the stuff that is not processed? We dont see true reality, whatever true reality might be, maybe all of these mystic types are on to something that we of the science club dont understand because we can only test things in a lab that we deem to be physical or "real". Maybe Im all wrong?

  • @KrautAttack78 maybe... But what good is it to "know" something (even if it's intrinsically real) if you cannot pass that knowledge to anyone else? Science is the process of not just confirming information but also of passing it on to other human beings. So unless those mystics can prove that what they claim is real it is useless unless it affects our own collective human reality when they get enough people to believe them and start a cult based on a fantasy or a lie or a misinterpretation.

  • @xm377Moyocoyatzin, thats true...but there are people out there that have seen and experienced weird things and they dont even want to talk about them. There have been cases of NDE's under clinical observation and people that were blind from birth were clinically dead and they explained everything they seen when they came back, the doctors said they had no scientific explanation for these things, what do you know about that? It caught my interest and I want to learn more about it.

  • @xm377Moyocoyatzin there is no God, and the universe didn't come out of nothingness, we as Humans just don't know the exact conditions for the universe being born. there may way well be a time in the future where we do discover exactly what the universe was born out of. The Big Bang is just a theory and untill we prove otherwise then it's the only real theory we have.

  • YAY

    for Best of Science.

    One of the best You Tube channels - period!

  • Yahh google sucks.

    Advertising big tube but sticking out a pipe.

    ten minutes to download 24 mb ?

    USA The era of copper was last Millennium.

    Go fiber or get of the grid.

  • What if we still see galaxies past the 15 billion mark? Will that disprove the Big Bang theory?

  • yes, but we cant see that far out. look up the wmap mission.

  • It's good to know that there's an educated person like you out there debunking the crap that those real scientists spew with their fancy degrees, and their their fancy edumacationz u no?

  • Put your tinfoil hat back on JonThm.

  • Right... and santa is real.

  • @JmSantos78 ? And Global Warming was fiction from nuclear power, copied from 'Soylant Green'

  • VERY interesting :)

  • You should do some research into the science of astronomy so you can learn about spectrascopes and other means to get information about stars and don't go to youtube for all your answers.

  • I could not stop myself from correcting her grammar aloud at the end. 'Further, damn it! Further back in time!'

  • I love y'all

  • If light has been travelling for 90 billion years old, that means teh galaxy is at least that old! Have you any coception of how much matter that is? I think about 50 million, billion suns. And we are told the speed of expamsion is expanding - not that is quite a recoil!

  • Stars are born and die. No start, no end.

  • Birth and death is a beginning and an end though

  • Very beautiful images!!!!

  • Scientists are wiser than you, they are not just another guys in the bar with their own acquired set of taste and belief like you. Face it already.

  • thanks good video

  • Er... come again?

    Are you saying we should stop trying to learn about the origins of the universe? Is there something wrong with the inquiring mind trying to discover new things?

    This info is not just in the media. It's circulated throughout the scientific community too. Media (when unbiased) just simplifies it so the average citizen can understand...

    I did read your comment right didn't I? O_o

  • I'm saying stop trying to do that as lamers. Start to study for real.

  • I think I see what your saying. Youtube and other sites are not the best for learning science?

    It is very true that when writing a scientific paper, the worst places to reference is youtube and wikipedia because they just aren't credible.

    However, everything here matches with what I've learned. I'm a science student and I took first year astronomy. I think people watch these to either learn something new, reinforce what they already know and cause it's cool. For me its the last two reasons. ;)

  • In this chat room I wanted to point with my studying remark to the way you seemed to argue about lamer's points. A serious argument on lamer's terms is ridiculous. Sure, we can argue for fun about stuff of which we don't have specialist knowledge, just to be social, to test our imagination and ideas etc., even if it was for real research. But just don't take seriously, as if you could know better than the other. They can't refer to any authority whatsoever.

  • The BB was at 12 billioin years ago, they see further, it is 14 billion years ago. Next year 16!

  • Actually, the universe is around (at least) 90 billion light years across. Which means it is further across then light could possibly have traveled since the beginning of the universe.

    If you actually read about The Big Bang theory, you would know why; space expanded.

    It has never been definitively dated, some say its around 16 billion, others around 20 billion.

    The fact that we do not know exactly when it happened, does not prove it wrong.

  • The 13.7 bn number is ubiquitous. I'd say they're pretty solid on that one.

  • The further we see, the more the 'Big Bang' is pushed back! It never happened - or we are on the 4th generation of stars. How? Where's the H from?

  • this science religion is bollocks, gOD made earth 6012 years ago in 6 days and he took a nap on seventh day, because you know creating human brain is pretty complicated and takes long time, infact it takes millions of years hmmm OH WAIT......

  • ROFL i was about to say that, then i saw your comment which was hidden.

    +1

  • @JonThm: You did listen to what she said, right? "13 billion years, just 800 million years after he Big Bang". No one said 14 billion years. The difference is crucial.

    At 300,000 years after the Big Bang the universe became transparent; we'll not be able to see farther back than that with any current instrument.

  • Actually, we do. We use radio waves and have mapped the Big Bang. We don't use visible light, we use radio waves. Light and radio waves are merely vibrational energy at two different frequencies. Just because our eyes pick up photons and our retinas are limited to a specific spectrum doesn't mean alien life millions of light years away have eyes that pick up only radio waves.

  • Ah, but the universe was not transparent to any radiation before 300,000 years after the BB. The CMB is the remnant of he light that was released when the universe became transparent. As far as I know, we cannot approach closer than that with any instruments in he magneic spectrum.

  • Yoda says, "We will... we will..."

  • Cool. I'll be waiting for it, with bells on.

  • "Stars are still forming so it did not happen"

    Wow. That has to be the most uninformed and desperate argument I have ever read.

  • Did Mommy or Daddy spank you when you asked who made God?

  • Evidence please

  • It suggests so in my Holy Bible.

  • Comment removed

  • No, you evolved from apes.

  • If Americans are descended from Europeans, why are there still Europeans?

  • Is that a joke?

  • They didn't evolve from Europeans.

  • Because "apes" and "great apes" in particular is a term used to describe a wide array of different creatures. The common ancestor we share with many other animals, is not around anymore.

  • Yet there is so much evidence for the contrary.

    But dont listen to me, research it yourself.

  • I have researched it. Evolution is still a theory, isn't it?

  • A theory, so what? What is the meaning of a word theory?

  • Indeed it is.

    So is gravity btw.

    What is your point?

  • MusicHypno. *theory* means something completely different in science than in everyday language, you see. Both gravity and evolution are facts, even though there exists theories/models explaining how they work. And please, learn science from scientists, not preachers or priests who believe ancient fairy-tales are facts...such people are not very good sources of information about anything. Because there's obviously something very wrong with adults who believe fairytales and have imaginary friends

  • WRONG. A theory is a logical explanation that incorporates all available data and is subject to repeated experimentation.

    And you "scientifically accurate" Bible says that bats are birds, pi is exactly 3, and rabbits chew cud.

  • evolution is a fact dumb shit

  • @kaga13 How do you know for sure Hubble and NASA images about the universe are concrete?

  • cause I can see them, if there is a faith attributed to it it isn't the same you might have for the christian version of god

    musichypno good job

  • @kaga13 Where can you see them? if you are refering to the stars outside on a dark night, well for all we know the earth could be alone and NASA could be the liars

  • Hehe, Hypno, I understand now. You're just joking, you're pretending to be a really retarded christian. You can stop now, you're busted and it's getting tedious. : )

  • :) I wanted to see how long I could keep people going.

  • Hehe, it was funny for a while, but it can get boring. Cause it is just like debating a real creationist, they're so retarded it's impossible to tell the difference between them and pranksters like you.: )

  • ignorant little toad.

  • Bad troll. Bad! Go to your corner!

  • Musicretard, I told you to find out what *scientific theory* is. And oh yeah, "The Bible" is a very accurate fairy-tale-book..did you know that the ignorants who wrote it actually believed the whole Earth could be flooded by a rain-storm? Yes, they actually believed that, but they also believed the Earth was flat and just a little bigger than The Mediterranean, hehe. To completely flood the whole planet covering the mountains, you would need 25-30 times as much water as there is on Earth..Ooops!

  • we dont descend from apes you moron... Apes are the ones that didn evolve from primates ...Youŕ an asshole realy

  • I know I didn't evolve from apes, only EVILutionists like you are saying that.

  • you dont know, you BELIVE that you didnt evolve from ape. Evolutionists howere KNOW that you evolved from ape.

  • to be more exact same ancestor of ape not the ape as we characterise today.

  • You BELIEVE we evolved from monkeys, I KNOW God created me because he told me.

  • go and fkin start from primery school again, maybe this will clean up your head.

  • I don't get to public schools because they spout lies about EVILution.

  • MusicHypno, a psychiatrist can tell you what that voice in your head "telling you things" is. And it's NOT a "god", "santa", "unicorn" or anything like it. And the psychiatrist can maybe help you get rid of the "voice in your head" too. You should try it.

  • Lazy troll is lazy. The burden of proof is on the one making the claim. Six thousand you say? Go on. Show me a boat that can fit two of every animal on earth. Made of wood, of course.

  • Wow...you call me a troll and then go on to explain why I was wrong, do you even know what a troll is?

  • Hah

  • The word "ape" is used to describe a branch of primates.

  • lol im not american so i didn t know xD

  • Because apes and humans evolved from a common ancestor, so ants, amoebas, and lizards are still around. So what! A million years from now, new species we never even heard of will be here.

  • You are a monkey, dumb ass.

  • You're joking right? Pulling a fast one on us?

  • In mine as well.

  • You must have strong faith to believe in something written by people thousands of years ago, not the mention they had NOTHING but time on their hands. Personally i think they were just good story writers.

  • No they weren't. They were horrible story writers. Seriously, they wrote one book, took them a few hundred years, and they STILL couldn't even make it interesting, logical, or keep it from contradicting itself in dozens of places.

  • Ok good fantasists?

  • Well, they were determined. I'll give 'em that much.

  • Damnit, troll, stop being such a troll.

  • successful troll is successful

  • Dude, stop trolling. You're wasting everyone's time.

  • who thinks that?? O_o

  • @nub50wn

    religious nut jobs known as creationist.

  • they can believe what they want, but damn they need to wake up. Science is coming to the point where it will be able to completely dismiss human superstition of GOD.

    I don't mind people who believe in him, but if they force it on me i'm not happy. They say God is about freedom, so why can't we choose to not believe in him? Failures in my eyes.

  • Very interesting!~Like it!

  • goochie goochie goo, "baby galaxies". :)

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more