What are the differences between H2O and HHO

[Desertphile]

This is a scam; the claims are fraudulent. Beware.

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile Your a dork, stop doing meth. Beware reality.

[Desertphile]

@ThePresidentialTouch ; Trying to insult me won't change the fact that this is a fraud.

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile You ARE an insult to the human race, and there's no fact to change since it isn't a fraud, chickenshit troll.

[Desertphile]

@ThePresidentialTouch ; It's a scam. Deal with it.

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile Your a scam, and you have been dealt with.

[Desertphile]

@ThePresidentialTouch ; My a scam? You aren't making any sense.

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile You're projecting again. Badly.

[Desertphile]

@ThePresidentialTouch ; It's still a scam. Try to keep up.

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile You're still a scam. Better? Don't have to, you're standing still, we've moved on. More projectionism? Really? Really? Is that all you have? Dissapointing. Thought the Great and Powerful Desertphile might have something that would prove NASA, Wright-Pat AFB, MIT, U of SF, U of S. Australia and thousands of users wrong, but you don't, do you? No, clearly not, nothing at all.

[Desertphile]

@ThePresidentialTouch ; " You're still a scam." See, that is why educated people do not take you fools seriously. It's still a scam, fool.

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile So, the Great and Powerful Desertphile actually HAS SOMETHING that proves he's smarter, more scientifically correct and has unquestionable motives over and above all of the students and staff at all of these facilities of higher learning. Jeepers! What could this magical proof of his be? We're all sitting on pins and needles waiting for your answer, or do you have one?

[Desertphile]

@ThePresidentialTouch ; Huh? All the educated people are on my side, you silly goose. This is a scam: you'll just have to adjust.

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile What? Even MORE projectionism, eh? Well, since ALL the educated people ARE on YOUR side, then why do NASA, Wright-Pat AFB, MIT, U of SF, U of S. Australia have demonstrable proof to the opposite of your useless meth-induced spoutings? Answer me that one. Oh wait, that's right, you don't HAVE any answers! Still waiting on that magical proof of yours, that doesn't exist!

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile The only scam here is you, from beginning to end and all in between. The only adjustment needed here is in your mental state, but it's just TOO BURNED OUT FROM METH to be adjustable, or of use to anyone else. The Great and Powerful Desertphile, LOL. I really expected more, but all there is from your end are regurgitated lies and sad attempts at projectionism. Silly, little, boy.

[Desertphile]

@ThePresidentialTouch ; That's nice, you silly goose. This video is still a scam, oxyhydrogen devices are still worthless in increasing MPG. You'll just have to grow up.

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile Ahh, just as I thought, no proof from you. No proof to support your allegations whatsoever. Just simple, soundbite-worthy lies. Lies! It's ALL you have. Video a scam? You're not making sense. But that's what liars do, make statements that, at face value, sound important, but really just serve to cloud the issue. No one believes meth heads, they all lie too much to get their drugs.

[Desertphile]

@ThePresidentialTouch ; He who posits the affirmatives proves. Try again, child.

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile ...aaaaannnnnd MORE attempts at making projectionism stick. Silly Meth Head, trick's are for kids! What was that, some Nietzche-ish bullshit to pass the time and make it look like you're NOT losing the arguement? The Great And Powerfull Desertphile has spoken!! All Hail the Power of the Crystal!! What a zygote. It is fun beating up on you like this though, it's been awhile, thanks!!

[Desertphile]

@ThePresidentialTouch ; That's all you have: attempts to insult me because I have the terrible audacity to speak the truth. Its a scam, child.

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile ...aaaaannnnnnnd that's where you lost the arguement completely. If you were speaking the TRUTH, you would have PROOF on your side. YOU DO NOT HAVE PROOF ON YOUR SIDE, and therefore when speaking this "truth" you are, in fact and by proxy, spreading a LIE. This is very simple to understand. If you disagree with that assesment, then PROVE ME WRONG. Simple. Right?

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile Oh, and I'm not attempting to insult you, you insult yourself by living to spread lies for no good reason other than projectionist gratification, insisting on living in the dark side of human existence, I just point out the obvious chinks in your armor and stab away with a spear tip from a distance for the pleasure of the masses looking on. It's good to give the kids pointers on how to shut down sociopaths.

[Desertphile]

@ThePresidentialTouch ; Buy gosh and golly, it is still a scam, still a fraud, and still robbing stupid people like you. Gosh, and you not only fell for the scam but you defend your robbers. You flunked the IQ test.

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile How can it be a scam, or a fraud, or robbing anyone who does it correctly, when I know I personally am consistently saving 20% or better from my previous mileage without using a cell? If you call saving money "robbing" then I am "robbing all the way to the bank! Universities aren't designed to produce scientific lies. Still smart enough to see that you have no proof and that says something.

[Desertphile]

@ThePresidentialTouch ; These devices do not increase MPG. You cult nuts *REFUSE* to step forward and show any evidence otherwise. It's a scam.

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile Mine did. I can only repeat myself so many times on so many videos, which is only part of why why I won't be your secretary and regurgitate on command. I gave you the path, you want me to walk it for you too? Damn, you're lazy. The tests performed by universities listed here is evidence enough for all to see anytime they, or you, wish. You can lead a horse to water....

[Desertphile]

@ThePresidentialTouch ; No, yours did not increase MPG. If it had done so you would present the evidence; you would also be a multi-billionaire. Step forward and produce evidence these devices increase MPG: be world-famous and wealthy---- what are you waiting for?!

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile Since the research has already been done at university level testing standards, why would my personal results be more valuable to you? So you can use every other tired, old worn out nick-picking technique you've tried on anyone else who has disputed the Great and Powerful Desertphile? No thanks, I see university tests proving you wrong don't faze you, why would mine matter?

[MegaVelvetElvis]

@ThePresidentialTouch

"Since the research has already been done at university level testing standards"

Liar. I actually read and understood these "university tests". They specifically stated that their emissions were worse. They ran their electrolysis unit off the grid, and the power requirements are beyond a car with a typical alternator.

Get some math skills sugar britches. The "study" disproves claims that HHO devices work.

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@MegaVelvetElvis Really? Then why would this exist?

watch?v=ypBhBMOpVFE&feature=re­lated

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile Oh, and yes, it did improve my mileage and cleaned up my emissions too, and, you can't prove it didn't! All you can do is lie, deceive, and posture, meth head!

Meth head! Meth head! Meth head! Meth head! Meth head! :)

[Desertphile]

@ThePresidentialTouch ; Oh, and yes there is a giant invisible unicorn on the moon and you can't prove it isn't!

Sheeeish, you clowns are hilarious.

Step forward and produce evidence for your claim, clown.

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile Keep smokin' that shit and and you'll take a ride on the cow that jumped over the moon!! I can prove there's no unicorn there, the man in the moon will know about that for sure!!

You consider the staff and students at major universities and military bases to be clowns? You are Wile E. Coyote: Suuuuperrrr Geeeneeeeeeuusssss!!!!

If I step forward, wouldn't I be out of line?

You are also, clown shoes. Loud, fat, embarassing in public, and only funny to five year olds.

[Desertphile]

@ThePresidentialTouch ; Damn, still no evidence from you that these devices increase MPG. Well, let me know when you have some. Thank you.

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile Shucks, still to lazy to look it up yourself the university research done proving they increase MPG. Well let me know when you can look at a different page on the screen other than anything related to youtube. Your welcome.

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile I see university tests proving you wrong don't faze you, why would mine matter?

[Desertphile]

@ThePresidentialTouch ; What "university tests?" No university has tested these devices and found they work as claimed.

So. Put up or run away again: take my challenge.

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile Define "work as claimed". For starters ,does the University of South Australia ring a bell? I know others have brought it up to you on other threads, so don't pretend this is a revelation.

The day I run from you is the day a way is found to prove HHO doesn't improve fuel mileage in fossil fuel ICE's without onboard computer restriction/intrusion.

[Desertphile]

@ThePresidentialTouch ; LOL! The University of South Australia?! ROTFL! They didn't test these devices and you know they did not.

So, you have nothing. Your claims are therefore false. Prove otherwise: step forward with evidence your claims are true. What the hell are you waiting for?

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile The evidence is there for all to see for themselves.

Since you say I have no evidence, that my claims are false. Yet, you cannot offer up any evidence to prove your side, so by your logic, your claims are therefore false. Prove otherwise: step forward with evidence your claims are true. What the hell are you waiting for?

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile The evidence is there for all to see for themselves.

Since you say I have no evidence, that then therefore my claims are false. Yet, you cannot offer up any evidence to prove your side, so, by your logic, your claims are therefore false. Prove otherwise: step forward with evidence your claims are true. What the hell are you waiting for?

[Desertphile]

@ThePresidentialTouch ; Yep! You refuse to produce evidence, and then you offered a citation that had nothing at all to do with the subject. LOL! Well, that's the best you can do and I am disappointed.

Take my challenge.

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile Nope! You are incorrect and lying, and they are not the only source for these types of tests performed among others. Some places I have already mentioned.

You still haven't provided your magical proof. I asked first, and I am disappointed.

Take a bath.

[Desertphile]

@ThePresidentialTouch ; Damn, you still haven't produced any evidence. I'm waiting patiently, but it appears you will never get around it producing any. Ah, well. I remain e'er hopeful.

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@Desertphile Shucks, you still haven't produced any evidence. I'm waiting patiently, but it appears you will never get around it producing any. Ah, well. I remain ever cheerful.

[MegaVelvetElvis]

@ThePresidentialTouch

"you can't prove it didn't!"

But you "could" take your vehicle to an EPA approved facility and have it tested, with the device on and off. There are plenty of awards available to make it worth your while.

But you won't do that, because they don't work.

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@MegaVelvetElvis Why, when all you would do with it is something like this.

watch?v=ypBhBMOpVFE&feature=re­lated

Your type are too busy discrediting yourselves, I don't have to do anything.

[MegaVelvetElvis]

@ThePresidentialTouch

"Why, when all you would do with it is something like this."

Because you'd make millions. There are plenty of prized out there if anyone can demonstrate it works, using an EPA licensed testing facility. I've been running the numbers and power requirements for an HHO device run up short for your average car.

So you refuse to provide evidence to backup your claim. Okay.

[ThePresidentialTouch]

@MegaVelvetElvis Prized? What's that? Those tests have already been run, and they didn't have to fake their results like the one in the vid I sent to you. Running numbers proves bumblebees can't fly, which, is absoloutly useless to the bumblebee itself.

No refusal. Give me YOUR airtight circumstances regarding the test. Cover every angle so that there can be no point of contention as to the results and let's see what happens.