Excellent question. The masses are chosen for their chemical compositions. They should be as dense as possible (to allow their centers of mass to approach as closely as possible) while also electrically & magnetically inert. The best overall material that's commonly available is lead. It's very dense, it doesn't tend to accumulate static electric charge, and is magnetically unresponsive.
Thankyou, It's interesting because if you swapped the weights on the ends of the torsion balance for strong magnets of equal weight, you'd expect the same result.
@qed100 I would say that gold would be the "best overall material" considering its density and how inert it is ect. However there are other limitations that make it a less attractive choice compared to lead. Also one must consider the composition of the rest of the apparatus, not just the weight to allow for a truely fair test.
mmm , no muy mal , quien alla echo este video muy mal
para imajenes crei que mejor busco en una pagina diferente
AndrewwwRoan 2 months ago
tomorrow is my physics paper
Mrjellykid 1 year ago
how do you know it's not some other effect? like magnetisim?
PerfectBlindness 2 years ago
Excellent question. The masses are chosen for their chemical compositions. They should be as dense as possible (to allow their centers of mass to approach as closely as possible) while also electrically & magnetically inert. The best overall material that's commonly available is lead. It's very dense, it doesn't tend to accumulate static electric charge, and is magnetically unresponsive.
qed100 2 years ago 5
Thankyou, It's interesting because if you swapped the weights on the ends of the torsion balance for strong magnets of equal weight, you'd expect the same result.
PerfectBlindness 2 years ago
Actually, you would expect a much stronger force. G is to the power of -11.
lhkjmvnb 2 years ago 3
@qed100 I would say that gold would be the "best overall material" considering its density and how inert it is ect. However there are other limitations that make it a less attractive choice compared to lead. Also one must consider the composition of the rest of the apparatus, not just the weight to allow for a truely fair test.
johnbunsenburner 1 year ago
@johnbunsenburner
Yes, I see your point. It's even more dense than Uranium.
qed100 1 year ago
@johnbunsenburner it is a very good conductor, not good
gibbo1112 4 months ago
@PerfectBlindness use nonmagnetic materials....
SheerPandemonium 1 year ago