A quick info for the idiots, Technology is the making of and using TOOLS, machinery, etc. Science is the reasoned investigation of some phenomena. Technology is NOT! always a product of science. When they invented the wheel, they didnt think about conservation of momentum and energy equations then.
@Ma7m9d Actually they looked for something with low friction and science with help & use of mathematics has turned that wheel into cars, trucks, trains, and even your computer
@Ma7m9d You sound like an asshole. Technology is science. Without science there wouldn't be technology because that is science taking a goddamn material form. It's applying new found knowledge to physical applications.
So its like one one side of the mirror is that, that makes you possible to be in time space time, on the other side is that, that is the projection of you intersecting space time our, space time.
this would suggest that atoms have a very finite life span and then dissapear from the universe or at least our present time, then that they some how are being replaced from a higher dimension of space time qauntumly connected to this side of the space time, it explains a relationship with time and how matter stays in sync with the passage of time, and that when we look deep into matter it appears holigraphic because were seeing the projection.
is it possible that atoms that disapear from this universe have winked out of existance and what apears to have returned is the same atom just a different time slice of that atom from a higher dimention of space qauntumly linked to the space time that we know?
the idea is that atoms wink out of existance and what returns is a another time slice of that atom in sincronization with the present time.
that an atom in order to stay in phase with the present has to be recreated like the pages of a animated cartoon, that if the atom were not continuiosly recreated in phase with time it would disapear from our point of view forever.
in order for an object to stay stable in our time space it would have to be destoryed and receated constantly.
here is a theorie related to matter and how it stays in phase with time space, it's not an official theorie of quantum mechanics but may have some investigative merrit.
imagine on a mirrior, when you look down you see your reflection it appears as if your feet are standing on your refections feet, now imagine each side of the mirror is is a different dimension of space, that one side is the space time we know, on the other side is a higher dimension. it is known that atoms disapear and reappear from our universe,
that the reason atoms disapear from our universe is because the time slice for that version of you has been destroyed and recreated as anotherr time slice of you in billionths of a nano second, this is what makes it possible for you and anything else to exists in the present time.
now imagine the reflection is a concentraited you being projected into this space time including your consciousness that you are entangled with this concentraited energy, that what you are is simply a time slice of that higher dimensional version of you being projected into this universe
lol but in absolute sterile beginnings these fluctuations can not exist as the cause of the big bang, qauntum fluctuations need a universe or space time to fluctuate and since nothing has been created before the big bang where are they getting this so preexisting space foam that the universe wouild spring from?
they can not discount this law as a property of polluted space that this only exists within out universe not in some prebang sterile nothingness?
We don't know what was before Big Bang, nor do we know why there was a big bang
What we do know is there is an ongoing expansion of the universe, and from analysing radiation we can conclude that something VERY big happened those 13 billion years ago. Aka, the big bang
As of now, we only have theories of why the big bang happened, some say that universe is an enless cycle of explosions and implosions
Maybe in the future we will have more denifitive answers
Should look into the brilliant work of Walter Russell who was friends with Nikola Tesla.
Russell beautifully detailed the origin of matter, the misconception of "gravity", light, black holes, big bangs, atoms, dual vortexes, the periodic table and So much more.
hey i just came up with a new theory while i was high. its called the 2bit theory. there is either a positive or a negative and that is the law of everything that exists / existed / will exist. Examples : it either exists or it doesn't exist / either positive and negative matter (dark matter) and even complex things like good and evil. if u look around everything in the world has 2 sides. and then multiple things other than + and - form from combining + - in different patterns like a computer
@luniarxox Your 2bit theory is very interesting and it is true, but what about the gray matter in the middle? Not everything is either black or white. Take ladies for example, no man can fully figure them out. They are a part of gray matter for sure. Moreover, they keep running away from the kitchen, just check car accidents videos as proof. Let's than call it 2bit+graymatter theory and close the case once and for all. Thanks mate, well done. Cheers, :)
Don't go to "Understanding The Interaction of energy and Matter" It is all about the Quran and the uploader won't let you post thoughtful comments. For example I tried to post my theory that the universe was created when God and Allah were tag teaming mother nature and their balls slapped together and resulted in a big bang, only to find my insightful comments were pending approval.
I've died and came back and I have to admit that there is no such thing as a god or a devil. What I saw was bizarre shapes and other universes! I also the strings vibrating throughout the cosmos! The strings make everything up! M-theory is correct! And Stephen Hawking is GOD!
I fancy a fight with a religious nutter, any takers? This is a beautiful theory and i hope you do get the computer power required to finish the project.
@maximkazhenkov11 I agree it is interesting.... its beauty, ellegant, but useless XD like art!
I see those things he said i would see if my eyes had been evolved to it every time i use Ayahuasca. so, I find science a really nice thing, but to understand this world, i'll stick with the ancient. Historic evidence shows me they was a way more tolerant and mainly more humble.
and i cant stop thinking that: Much knowledge makes you arrogant, Huge knowledge makes you humble.
@maximkazhenkov11 The most ironical thing is that the best scientists agree with it XD
Its the normal distinction between the True Genius and the Follower...... it happens in religion, and also in science at the same rate and MO iauhsdisuahsdhaysa
Science did not give us everything. It is technology. Most if not all inventions that changed ppl's life were actually discovered by chance and by trials and errors. No science was behind them .. Big headed people later after digging after them discovered the so called laws.
@maximkazhenkov11 Do you know that sentence? "The computers came to be in order to solve problems that we aint had before computers came to be"??
Pretty much the same thing...
I agree with you that science done a lot of good things, compared to religion, its absurd that anyone would ever consider not to believe in science, given the alternative...
I'm just saying that to fully understand this reality... empirical process will lead to nowhere...
@maximkazhenkov11 Ok, i agree that this reality will continue even without humans, or mostly even without any kind of mind or thinking... But WE are humans, our way to understand EVERYTHING must be human.
No one knows how is it like to be a fucking rock... ^^
Give to Caesar what is his, but no more than that.
I'm already tired of explain to the folks i work with why my models of AI works better than theirs... I try to make computers break the laws of logic, and it fits... XD
CAMPAIGN TO STOP MUTUAL HATRED ON VIDEOS ABOUT SCIENCE
1) Do NOT discuss theology or religion (either FOR or AGAINST) in videos about SCIENCE.
2) Do NOT retaliate or contribute to these discussions. This will only spark a heated discussion which, quite honestly, WILL HELP NO ONE in the end.
3) If you feel the need to address someone, send them a PRIVATE MESSAGE instead. DON'T BE A NUISANCE TO EVERYONE JUST FOR THE SAKE OF YOUR OWN INFLATED EGO.
@CarlosMarti123 No. I consider that it should be common sense that one should never pollute a discussion about science with religious bullshit or respond to such commentaries.
But you are in no position to impose or recommend rules of conduct on a free website. Just ignore the religious comments and do not feed the trolls and have a good day. Sorry for my rudeness! :)
@DaFleegsta If theists are retards, would you say that Ockham, Copernicus, Napier, Bacon, Kepler, Galileo, Descartes, Pascal, Boyle, Leibniz, Newton, Euler, Faraday, Maxwell, Pasteur, Lord Kelvin, Cantor, Plank, Dyson, Lennox, and Collins were or are all retards?
Anyone who believes in extraordinary claims (including invisible super man in the sky, talking snakes, zombie saviours, ghosts, evil monsters in the center of the earth, life after death, etc) without any evidence whatsoever is a fucking retarded moron.
If you disagree, too bad.. You might as well be a theist as you're likely as retarded as they are.
On a serious note, theism is unhealthy to everyone. It causes so much damage to our world. The more we help, the better.
@DaFleegsta Sorry, but I don't think some of the greatest thinkers in the history of mankind were “fucking retarded morons,” but I do believe it's certainly more likely that YOU are a fucking retarded moron, as your comments clearly continue to demonstrate. The fact that you must call someone a retard for disagreeing with you shows just how obnoxious, detestable, and ignorant you are. Stop replying and you might well save yourself some of the dignity you have left, if any.
@CarlosMarti123 If I believe in god, then I can do what ever I want as long as I believe it's what god wants. War, rape, murder, genocide, etc are linked to theism much more often than atheism. People that need a book to tell them what is morally correct is dangerous, as they do not evaluate right and wrong themselves effectively butchering their basic thinking. Believing in an afterlife encourages the idea that justice will be served after death, eliminating the need for justice on earth.
@DaFleegsta If you believe in ANYTHING, then you can do whatever you want.
For instance, if you are a moral nihilist, you cannot object to murdering someone or torturing them. How can you tell a psychopath or serial killer to evaluate “right or wrong” for themselves? The point is that absolutely anything can be used to justify whatever it is that you choose to do in the end. You are responsible.
@CarlosMarti123 I believe in lots of stuff, that doesn't mean I can do whatever I want. I have this thing called morality, which is what I use to evaluate if something is right or wrong. If it's right, I can do it. If it's wrong, I can't. If I rely on a pre-written set of rules without ever questioning them as my source of moral judgement, I could end up doing some very bad things depending on what the rules are.
@DaFleegsta “If it's right, I can do it. If it's wrong, I can't. If I rely on a pre-written set of rules without ever questioning them as my source of moral judgement, I could end up doing some very bad things depending on what the rules are.”
Ahem, and what is that thing you said earlier about morality?
Those sets of “arbitrary rules” are exactly what compose your morality.
@CarlosMarti123 I didn't say arbitrary. Don't put words in my mouth. Our sense of morality develops in our brain. If we were too immoral, we wouldn't be here. We learn morality on both an evolutionary scale as well as a personal growth scale (You know that 'mine phase' kids go through? That's their morality in development.) That's like saying "how do we know how to eat?". Because if we didn't, we'd DIE. I think you need to look up some basic psychology and evolution.
@DaFleegsta “I didn't say arbitrary. Don't put words in my mouth. Our sense of morality develops in our brain. If we were too immoral, we wouldn't be here. We learn morality on both an evolutionary scale as well as a personal growth scale.”
What if you or someone else had experienced a different experience of “personal growth” and come to the conclusion that murder is alright?
@CarlosMarti123 "What if you or someone else had experienced a different experience of “personal growth” and come to the conclusion that murder is alright?"
That DOES happen, we DO live in a world where some people believe that murder is alright, and they act accordingly. That just proves my statement, that morality is learned, not just magically given.
@DaFleegsta@DaFleegsta “Now your catching on. Psychopaths are a great example of this. There is no 'true' morality, only what the majority agrees on. And behaviour is part of evolution.”
@CarlosMarti123 Ah my bad, first time I've heard that term before. But yes I'd be a moral nihilist. Our morality is shaped for our survival, nothing else. There is no universal right and wrong.
@DaFleegsta@DaFleegsta “Of course not, because thank god we have atheism. I'm saying based on THEISTIC beliefs, not locking your doors would be perfectly fine (not having our own justice system would be perfectly fine).”
Based on theism, not locking your doors would be perfectly fine? How?
@DaFleegsta That DOES happen, we DO live in a world where some people believe that murder is alright, and they act accordingly. That just proves my statement, that morality is learned, not just magically given.
Then you are, in effect, a moral nihilist. You cannot object to murder.
@CarlosMarti123 Psychopaths and serial killers are a terrible example.. First of all, it depends on why the kill. For the sake of this arguement, I'd assume you mean the reason to be that they're just mentally ill. In that case, their morality (although does harm), is still justifiable TO THEM. There are tons of killers that claim they did it because god told them too (including stories written in the bible), but we as a people have a thing called justice to deal with this.
@DaFleegsta You said they should “judge by themselves” between right or wrong, not me. I will ask you again: Do you believe psychopaths should be left to “judge by themselves” between right or wrong?
@CarlosMarti123 Yes, psychopaths should judge by themselves between right and wrong. Everyone should. But how are psychopaths relevant? There are very few psychopaths in the world, why do you think that is? Psychopaths are mentally ill, so their idea of morality could be just as bad as Gods. Eitherway it doesn't mean we shouldn't take action accordingly. We all have different morals. We are a social species, if enough people disagree, we take action (ie punish or give medical help).
@DaFleegsta “Psychopaths and serial killers are a terrible example.. First of all, it depends on why the kill. For the sake of this argument, I'd assume you mean the reason to be that they're just mentally ill. In that case, their morality (although does harm), is still justifiable TO THEM.”
Exactly. How, then, is your subjective sense of morality objectively superior to theirs?
@CarlosMarti123 Because I believe that mine is the proper morality. Everyone does, but everyone morality is slightly different. The thing is, like I said earlier, if enough of us have the same moral opninion (ie, that psychopath is bad), we'll take action. Usually people have a healthy sense of morality, because as evolution shows, the ones that didn't die off.
Some animals have mental illnesses too, which could harm their species, but most don't, they get along. It's all evolution.
@DaFleegsta “Yes, psychopaths should judge by themselves between right and wrong. Everyone should. But how are psychopaths relevant? There are very few psychopaths in the world, why do you think that is?”
How do you consider your subjective sense of morality superior to theirs?
@DaFleegsta “Exactly. Having a camera (God) as your ultimate source of protection is unhealthy, because that means you have no reason lock your doors (have our own justice on earth). I'm glad you agree with this one.”
That was an example to show you that you are NOT right. That is only what YOU would do if there was an afterlife, not what everyone else would do in the same situation.
@CarlosMarti123 Of course not, because thank god we have atheism. I'm saying based on THEISTIC beliefs, not locking your doors would be perfectly fine (not having our own justice system would be perfectly fine).
I fail to see how that was supposed to show me that I'm NOT right, that just supported my argument. Religion encourages bad decisions.
@CarlosMarti123 The reason many theists still 'lock their doors' is because their basic morals conflict with the bible. Real morality triumphs. If theists evaluate the bible themselves anyway (ie what is reasonable and what isnt), then they don't even need the bible.. Why not cut out the middle man. They can simply decide for themselves what is right or wrong, instead of deciding if a books idea of right or wrong is moral.
@DaFleegsta “Because I believe that mine is the proper morality. Everyone does, but everyone morality is slightly different. The thing is, like I said earlier, if enough of us have the same moral opinion we'll take action.”
Just because you believe that yours is the proper morality does not make it so, does it?
Evolution can only explain what is, not how you should behave.
@DaFleegsta And I don't think I have ever heard of anyone say that believing in an afterlife eliminates the need for justice on Earth, or for helping others. That only seems to be your personal perspective, not anyone else's.
@CarlosMarti123 Well then you may want to do some more research.. Not that it matters who or how many people beleive in something; if it's right or not depends on if it's right or not.
If god is going to punish that serial killer anyways, then why should we? God is god, I'm sure he knows what he's doing.
@DaFleegsta “If god is going to punish that serial killer anyways, then why should we? God is god, I'm sure he knows what he's doing.”
That's like saying that you should place a camera on your driveway to catch the rapist, but at the same time leave the door to the house open “because you will catch him later anyway.”
@CarlosMarti123 Exactly. Having a camera (God) as your ultimate source of protection is unhealthy, because that means you have no reason lock your doors (have our own justice on earth). I'm glad you agree with this one.
@CarlosMarti123 I could go on listing ways that religion do more harm than good, but I think that should be enough to prove my point. It is dangerous when people make decisions based on something that isn't real. The bible itself demonstrates this multiple times.
@EmperorofCartoons the "intelligent" should never disrespect people because of there knowledge or lack there of, because it makes you sound like an idiot yourself
@EmperorofCartoons wasn't it intelligent people who dropped nukes on japan circa 1945? for someone claiming intelligence you really know how to set yourself up. stop holding humanity back.
so i see in the presentation the space-time fabric itself, the field fluctuation inside even empty space...so the emptyness of space-time duality is like a boiling foam?
science is like a fractal no matter how far we go big or mall we will always be faced with an infinite regress or continuum. so if you want to know the truth about this reality please go and eat a jalapeno cream cheese taquito at 7 11. that is truth!
ok ok stop who ever that speacker is well sorry but you have to go for now cause you got to keep a stride to your speech and your carying on with big words that come out of no where, trust me on this i love this type of study but you have to have a little more well understanding in the way you explane things........ hey if steven hawking can do it then so can you,.... take a page from his book then apply it, Im telling you a hole world will open up
God is the originator of mass hence the "God particle" aka Higgs Boson. At this point in science it's all theoretical so might as well believe in God. None of this nonsense like string theory or the multiverse could ever be proved.
@TheToxicRadio agreed so why don't you believe in god then? god is just as philosophical as m-theory. btw even if m-theory did exist, i would imagine that the parallel universes and dimensions of space would take on some kind of hierarchy. The "interdimensional" being in the top most universe and dimension would be "God" or the "giant spaghetti monster" for you atheists. lmfao.
@FallofDarkness55 i mean you toss string theory and multiverse out the window,& that it's all theoretical(even though in science a theory is something that has been put up to the test and backed up by scientific methods and calculations), so, might as well believe in god. do you know you just sound like you gave up, many scientists could have given up, but break throughs were still made.. i say we dig deeper and know more, rather than just say, god did it, no need to look any further, the end...
@TheToxicRadio explain to me how string theory or m-theory is science. it's science fiction and to me it's delusional more than the god hypothesis. it's just a theory designed by crack-heads not real physicists; even Einstein believed in God.
@FallofDarkness55 so Dr. Michio Kaku is a crack head, right, i'll make sure to let him know that at his next sermon, and Enstein belived in god? sure why not, that's his opinion but doesn't prove anything, i'm not ruling out the possibility of their being a creator, but i just don't see much going for that, string theory is much more a tangible possiblity(for lack of a better term) in this universe. what i'm saying is, if we just have the might as well believe mentality, then people stop looking
@TheToxicRadio I agree with what you said but m-theory still doesn't debunk the god hypothesis. Even if m-theory exists, then ask yourself this, "What created the branes, strings, parallel universes, dimensions, or the multi-verse?" I already know your counter-argument. "What created God?" Well you know how Einstein says time is a dimension. Well maybe time is also a force that is undetectable with an associated particle. Maybe this force doesn't overlap with God hence the reason God's eternal.
@TheToxicRadio continued from previous. why couldn't gravity, EM, strong, and weak forces also be dimensions. In fact Leonard Susskind believes something along these lines. He thinks the reason why gravity is so weak is because of the way the dimensions are wrapped up around each other in the subatomic regime. So if that's the case time could potentially be a force too. Also if there's life in this universe why couldn't there be life in another universe and in the highest possible dimension?
@FallofDarkness55 i totally agree with u on that, other dimensions playing their part, that could b a dffrnt type of force if they break a certain barrier 2 act in our own, however, if we say their is an intelligent designer that was in a different dimension that made our own, were still left with how did that designer come 2 be, it just goes back on & on & on, do i see that as a possibility? sure, i do but anything in between (if there is) should still be looked for. would it still be god here?
@TheToxicRadio maybe there's a dimension entirely devoted to energy, and since energy can neither be created or destroyed energy is simply eternal and merely converts to another type of energy based on the universe that overlaps this dimension of energy. maybe this is how our universe's big bang came about. in my mind though i like to think of god as a form of energy that created everything in the dimensions and parallel universes below it. i'm not saying it's correct. it's only my theory.
@FallofDarkness55 and thank you for actually being competent, and not just spouting crap around, i like seeing people that can think and not just give fuck yous and such... so tip of the hat to you..
As a Catholic I see that this mystery can be best appreciated by looking right under our noses. Spiritual Energy is a term that is used to describe the Holy Eucharist. (Google: "spiritual energy" Eucharist)
God spoke the words: "Let there be Light" The rest is His story.
@MRizzio THE WORLD IS REALY 4.5 BILLLLLIIIOOOONNNN YYYYEEEAAARRRSS OOOLLD NOT 12000 YEARS OLD OR MABY GOD JUST PUT DINOSOUR BONES HERE JUST TO TEST OUR FAITH BUT IF THERE WAS A GOD I DONT THINK HE WOULD FUCK WITH YOU LIKE THAT!
Then that means you can never believe in anything that hasn't been confirmed in a lab. The world to you must be a hellscape of open debate. It is common sense that there are quadrillions of planets in the universe for example, but our astronomers have only been able to verify that they have detected a few hundred. Under your philosophy there is a chance that there may not be quadrillions of planets in the universe. It's not ok to be wrong about something just because it can't be authenticated.
Hate those narrowed forehead fundamental religious people coming to a pure science channel and leave their dirty little comments... Always had a question, where did they get a confidence to discuss in a critical manner something they do not understand... Truly magic...
Why are we paying these people? If it wasn't for these people your dumb ass wouldn't have a fucking keyboard to type on.
All made by the Grand Designer?? Fuck, all I have to say to that is... It was all made by a big unicorn. And hey you know what? Incidentally Unicorns are much more plausible than some telepathic believe in me or go to hell but by the way i'm all forgiving hypocritical nonsense "God"
We need to clean up this fucking gene pool. Where's the idiot chlorine?
@1PintLasher God is whatever you want god to be like food could be your god. but if your talking biblical god name in the bible means tetragrammaton meaning mathematical tetrahedron and gravity that manifests out of everything. so god is not what we think he or it is but it is what is. And love humans, the smart have the responsibility teach and care fore the week minded. lovelessness = man ending man.
@1PintLasher God is whatever you want god to be like food could be your god. but if your talking biblical god name in the bible means tetragrammaton meaning mathematical tetrahedron and gravity that manifests out of everything. god is not what we think he or it is but it is what is. And love humans, the smart have the responsibility teach and care fore the week minded. lovelessness = man ending man.
@Piranha180x So you drop a jigsaw on the floor and all the pieces spread everywhere, yet in 4 trillions years time those piece will somehow 'evolve' and move themselves bit by bit with a kind of 'intelligence' to complete the jigsaw? You are thick??
@GanEdenAustralia Just because you are too stupid to understand the process evolution doesn't mean you get to make up Mr. magic man. that same question applies to your god. God came from nothing? That same logic can be applied to the univers. It came from nothing? No it's the natural process of things. No magic need apply.
First of all, you assume nature had some pre-picture/set pattern of design in mind when it made life. It doesn't. No one made or dropped pieces to a fucking puzzle which makes up the particles of the universe. That's the worst analogy ever. Also, puzzles are meant to be flat when assembled.
You are literally thinking less than two dimensionally.
If strong nuclear force is mediated through gluons, is the weak nuclear force mediated by paste-ons?
Snakepliskinist 2 weeks ago in playlist Particle Physics - Standard Model, Higgs boson, LHC
@MrGwowang You're very welcome, cocksucker.
EmperorofCartoons 2 months ago
heheh heheh heh hehe...hey beavis.... they're having a mass debate.... he heheh eheh
PutItAway101 2 months ago
OMG this is mindblowing
jewbinson 2 months ago
its good this video
surani98 3 months ago
A quick info for the idiots, Technology is the making of and using TOOLS, machinery, etc. Science is the reasoned investigation of some phenomena. Technology is NOT! always a product of science. When they invented the wheel, they didnt think about conservation of momentum and energy equations then.
Ma7m9d 4 months ago 9
@Ma7m9d Actually they looked for something with low friction and science with help & use of mathematics has turned that wheel into cars, trucks, trains, and even your computer
Borat911 2 months ago
@Ma7m9d You sound like an asshole. Technology is science. Without science there wouldn't be technology because that is science taking a goddamn material form. It's applying new found knowledge to physical applications.
aqouby 4 days ago
I don't think those masons likes being in 240P.
duguder 4 months ago
@duguder holy christ, we've just directly observed the granularity of spacetime! No wait, it's just 240P.
PutItAway101 2 months ago
So its like one one side of the mirror is that, that makes you possible to be in time space time, on the other side is that, that is the projection of you intersecting space time our, space time.
Lok783 4 months ago
this would suggest that atoms have a very finite life span and then dissapear from the universe or at least our present time, then that they some how are being replaced from a higher dimension of space time qauntumly connected to this side of the space time, it explains a relationship with time and how matter stays in sync with the passage of time, and that when we look deep into matter it appears holigraphic because were seeing the projection.
Lok783 4 months ago
this higher dimensional space would have to have something that can be interchangable as matter, potential waves?
so the question is can a potential wave exist of things like us and non living matter?
that somehow gets converted into matter as it intersects space time.
Lok783 4 months ago
is it possible that atoms that disapear from this universe have winked out of existance and what apears to have returned is the same atom just a different time slice of that atom from a higher dimention of space qauntumly linked to the space time that we know?
Lok783 4 months ago
the idea is that atoms wink out of existance and what returns is a another time slice of that atom in sincronization with the present time.
that an atom in order to stay in phase with the present has to be recreated like the pages of a animated cartoon, that if the atom were not continuiosly recreated in phase with time it would disapear from our point of view forever.
in order for an object to stay stable in our time space it would have to be destoryed and receated constantly.
Lok783 4 months ago
here is a theorie related to matter and how it stays in phase with time space, it's not an official theorie of quantum mechanics but may have some investigative merrit.
Lok783 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
imagine on a mirrior, when you look down you see your reflection it appears as if your feet are standing on your refections feet, now imagine each side of the mirror is is a different dimension of space, that one side is the space time we know, on the other side is a higher dimension. it is known that atoms disapear and reappear from our universe,
Lok783 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
that the reason atoms disapear from our universe is because the time slice for that version of you has been destroyed and recreated as anotherr time slice of you in billionths of a nano second, this is what makes it possible for you and anything else to exists in the present time.
Lok783 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
now imagine the reflection is a concentraited you being projected into this space time including your consciousness that you are entangled with this concentraited energy, that what you are is simply a time slice of that higher dimensional version of you being projected into this universe
Lok783 4 months ago
lol but in absolute sterile beginnings these fluctuations can not exist as the cause of the big bang, qauntum fluctuations need a universe or space time to fluctuate and since nothing has been created before the big bang where are they getting this so preexisting space foam that the universe wouild spring from?
they can not discount this law as a property of polluted space that this only exists within out universe not in some prebang sterile nothingness?
Lok783 4 months ago
@Lok783
We don't know what was before Big Bang, nor do we know why there was a big bang
What we do know is there is an ongoing expansion of the universe, and from analysing radiation we can conclude that something VERY big happened those 13 billion years ago. Aka, the big bang
As of now, we only have theories of why the big bang happened, some say that universe is an enless cycle of explosions and implosions
Maybe in the future we will have more denifitive answers
Science is exciting :)
opliik 4 months ago
Should look into the brilliant work of Walter Russell who was friends with Nikola Tesla.
Russell beautifully detailed the origin of matter, the misconception of "gravity", light, black holes, big bangs, atoms, dual vortexes, the periodic table and So much more.
Einstein never heard of Russell.
Take a look at some of this information.
The Leonardo Da Vinci of the 20th Century:
watch?v=AecQd2fJ-Hc
A New Concept of the Universe:
watch?v=5Wn5DRII0RA
(Free Energy and Free Thinking)
Feandft,com
TheRealVerbz 5 months ago
@fntime DON'T BE A NUISANCE TO EVERYONE JUST FOR THE SAKE OF YOUR OWN INFLATED EGO.
shandcunt 5 months ago
brown mass comes out of my fucken arsehole
HalfEatenDimSim 5 months ago
hey i just came up with a new theory while i was high. its called the 2bit theory. there is either a positive or a negative and that is the law of everything that exists / existed / will exist. Examples : it either exists or it doesn't exist / either positive and negative matter (dark matter) and even complex things like good and evil. if u look around everything in the world has 2 sides. and then multiple things other than + and - form from combining + - in different patterns like a computer
luniarxox 6 months ago
@luniarxox Yep, you were high.
BlackSunSerenade 6 months ago
@luniarxox Your 2bit theory is very interesting and it is true, but what about the gray matter in the middle? Not everything is either black or white. Take ladies for example, no man can fully figure them out. They are a part of gray matter for sure. Moreover, they keep running away from the kitchen, just check car accidents videos as proof. Let's than call it 2bit+graymatter theory and close the case once and for all. Thanks mate, well done. Cheers, :)
DeRex9 5 months ago 3
@DeRex9 and thats + and - combined because women have both male and female genes mixed togethr but there are just more female genes.
luniarxox 5 months ago
CarlosMarti123 - practising what he preaches.
CPLains 6 months ago
Today I was asked if I was Christian.
Comments?
luminositymusic 6 months ago
What...appears .
luminositymusic 6 months ago
Why so many religious idiots raging in the comments? Why can't people abandon these medieval beliefs and step into the 21st century?
antza2 7 months ago
@antza2 cause religion knows its end is near and they wont have masses of idiots to convert if the masses should become intelligent
DJM4EVER1 6 months ago
Don't go to "Understanding The Interaction of energy and Matter" It is all about the Quran and the uploader won't let you post thoughtful comments. For example I tried to post my theory that the universe was created when God and Allah were tag teaming mother nature and their balls slapped together and resulted in a big bang, only to find my insightful comments were pending approval.
Titantron9000 7 months ago
Ralph Nader is God. But, that's not religion. Just scientific fact.
mphello 8 months ago
I've died and came back and I have to admit that there is no such thing as a god or a devil. What I saw was bizarre shapes and other universes! I also the strings vibrating throughout the cosmos! The strings make everything up! M-theory is correct! And Stephen Hawking is GOD!
FallofDarkness55 9 months ago
@FallofDarkness55 then he'd be the SON of God, lol!
bellaKohler 9 months ago
I wish I had stronger math, lol.
unifiedreality 9 months ago
I fancy a fight with a religious nutter, any takers? This is a beautiful theory and i hope you do get the computer power required to finish the project.
Jugman10000 9 months ago
Science is interesting. If you disagree, fuck off.
maximkazhenkov11 9 months ago 36
@maximkazhenkov11 I agree with you. fuck religion.
FallofDarkness55 9 months ago
@maximkazhenkov11 lol thats funny
travsarnoldpump 6 months ago
@maximkazhenkov11 I agree it is interesting.... its beauty, ellegant, but useless XD like art!
I see those things he said i would see if my eyes had been evolved to it every time i use Ayahuasca. so, I find science a really nice thing, but to understand this world, i'll stick with the ancient. Historic evidence shows me they was a way more tolerant and mainly more humble.
and i cant stop thinking that: Much knowledge makes you arrogant, Huge knowledge makes you humble.
Hrejwaltz 4 months ago
@maximkazhenkov11 The most ironical thing is that the best scientists agree with it XD
Its the normal distinction between the True Genius and the Follower...... it happens in religion, and also in science at the same rate and MO iauhsdisuahsdhaysa
Hrejwaltz 4 months ago
@Hrejwaltz Science is useless? Science gave us everything, but sadly, never gets credit for it.
maximkazhenkov11 4 months ago
@maximkazhenkov11
Science did not give us everything. It is technology. Most if not all inventions that changed ppl's life were actually discovered by chance and by trials and errors. No science was behind them .. Big headed people later after digging after them discovered the so called laws.
Ma7m9d 4 months ago
@Ma7m9d technology is science you retard
IvanderHaisley 4 months ago
@IvanderHaisley -- You've got alot to learn, boy.
Ma7m9d 4 months ago
@Ma7m9d ooo..says the retard.... your stupid bitch !!!
IvanderHaisley 4 months ago
@Ma7m9d I was just tired of writing 'science and technology' everytime, smartass.
maximkazhenkov11 4 months ago
@Ma7m9d That comment gave me cancer.
ninjaswordtothehead 4 months ago
@Ma7m9d unfortunately you're retarded.
PutItAway101 2 months ago
@maximkazhenkov11 Do you know that sentence? "The computers came to be in order to solve problems that we aint had before computers came to be"??
Pretty much the same thing...
I agree with you that science done a lot of good things, compared to religion, its absurd that anyone would ever consider not to believe in science, given the alternative...
I'm just saying that to fully understand this reality... empirical process will lead to nowhere...
I'm a programmer, you see... continue...
Hrejwaltz 3 months ago
@maximkazhenkov11 Mainly in Artificial Intelligence research... for the true one, not those sad chat-bots...
Logic HAS to be refuted in order to achieve something interesting.
I agree science lead us far, but i cant believe that this far mean its in the RIGHT PATH.
Our world, as it appears to me, isn't logical, empirical, no absolute set in stone truths.
EVERYTHING has shades, gradients, interpretation etc etc
Humans try to understand this world like they want to get rid of the mind factor.
Hrejwaltz 3 months ago
@maximkazhenkov11 Ok, i agree that this reality will continue even without humans, or mostly even without any kind of mind or thinking... But WE are humans, our way to understand EVERYTHING must be human.
No one knows how is it like to be a fucking rock... ^^
Give to Caesar what is his, but no more than that.
I'm already tired of explain to the folks i work with why my models of AI works better than theirs... I try to make computers break the laws of logic, and it fits... XD
Hrejwaltz 3 months ago
mmm perturbations
EltBerserker 10 months ago
That is Aether, Darkmatter or Energy,
not 'nothing"
papasmurfXXX 1 year ago 2
CAMPAIGN TO STOP MUTUAL HATRED ON VIDEOS ABOUT SCIENCE
1) Do NOT discuss theology or religion (either FOR or AGAINST) in videos about SCIENCE.
2) Do NOT retaliate or contribute to these discussions. This will only spark a heated discussion which, quite honestly, WILL HELP NO ONE in the end.
3) If you feel the need to address someone, send them a PRIVATE MESSAGE instead. DON'T BE A NUISANCE TO EVERYONE JUST FOR THE SAKE OF YOUR OWN INFLATED EGO.
HELP CLEAN UP YOUTUBE - RESPECT OTHERS
CarlosMarti123 1 year ago 108
@CarlosMarti123 amen
nicoheckens1 11 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 Not against the TOS. Shove it, brother! ;-)
ktxed 11 months ago
@ktxed You wanna be a fucked up dickhead? Ok...
CarlosMarti123 11 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 No. I consider that it should be common sense that one should never pollute a discussion about science with religious bullshit or respond to such commentaries.
But you are in no position to impose or recommend rules of conduct on a free website. Just ignore the religious comments and do not feed the trolls and have a good day. Sorry for my rudeness! :)
ktxed 11 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 Well said.
breathless46 10 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 Please do not offensively dictate rules trying to proscribe freedom of speech on youtube !
zimtran007 9 months ago
@zimtran007 I'm not proscribing freedom of speech, it's a suggestion for staying on-topic.
CarlosMarti123 9 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 aka dumb people need to stay away from the smart people videos.
MrAnthonyfilms 8 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 fuck that theists are retarded and deserve to feel that way
DaFleegsta 7 months ago
@DaFleegsta If theists are retards, would you say that Ockham, Copernicus, Napier, Bacon, Kepler, Galileo, Descartes, Pascal, Boyle, Leibniz, Newton, Euler, Faraday, Maxwell, Pasteur, Lord Kelvin, Cantor, Plank, Dyson, Lennox, and Collins were or are all retards?
No, I think the retard here is someone else. You.
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 WRONG
Anyone who believes in extraordinary claims (including invisible super man in the sky, talking snakes, zombie saviours, ghosts, evil monsters in the center of the earth, life after death, etc) without any evidence whatsoever is a fucking retarded moron.
If you disagree, too bad.. You might as well be a theist as you're likely as retarded as they are.
On a serious note, theism is unhealthy to everyone. It causes so much damage to our world. The more we help, the better.
DaFleegsta 7 months ago
Comment removed
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
Comment removed
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@DaFleegsta Sorry, but I don't think some of the greatest thinkers in the history of mankind were “fucking retarded morons,” but I do believe it's certainly more likely that YOU are a fucking retarded moron, as your comments clearly continue to demonstrate. The fact that you must call someone a retard for disagreeing with you shows just how obnoxious, detestable, and ignorant you are. Stop replying and you might well save yourself some of the dignity you have left, if any.
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@DaFleegsta Theism is unhealthy to everyone? Really?
How come believers give more to secular charities than non-believers do?
hoover(.)org/publications/policy-review/article/6577
But I suppose you're too stubborn and bigoted to even consider your mistake.
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 If I believe in god, then I can do what ever I want as long as I believe it's what god wants. War, rape, murder, genocide, etc are linked to theism much more often than atheism. People that need a book to tell them what is morally correct is dangerous, as they do not evaluate right and wrong themselves effectively butchering their basic thinking. Believing in an afterlife encourages the idea that justice will be served after death, eliminating the need for justice on earth.
DaFleegsta 7 months ago
Comment removed
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
Comment removed
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
Comment removed
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
Comment removed
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
Comment removed
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
Comment removed
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@DaFleegsta If you believe in ANYTHING, then you can do whatever you want.
For instance, if you are a moral nihilist, you cannot object to murdering someone or torturing them. How can you tell a psychopath or serial killer to evaluate “right or wrong” for themselves? The point is that absolutely anything can be used to justify whatever it is that you choose to do in the end. You are responsible.
And most wars are NOT due to theism:
godandscience(.)org/apologetics/war_and_religion(.)html
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 I believe in lots of stuff, that doesn't mean I can do whatever I want. I have this thing called morality, which is what I use to evaluate if something is right or wrong. If it's right, I can do it. If it's wrong, I can't. If I rely on a pre-written set of rules without ever questioning them as my source of moral judgement, I could end up doing some very bad things depending on what the rules are.
DaFleegsta 7 months ago
Comment removed
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@DaFleegsta “If it's right, I can do it. If it's wrong, I can't. If I rely on a pre-written set of rules without ever questioning them as my source of moral judgement, I could end up doing some very bad things depending on what the rules are.”
Ahem, and what is that thing you said earlier about morality?
Those sets of “arbitrary rules” are exactly what compose your morality.
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 I didn't say arbitrary. Don't put words in my mouth. Our sense of morality develops in our brain. If we were too immoral, we wouldn't be here. We learn morality on both an evolutionary scale as well as a personal growth scale (You know that 'mine phase' kids go through? That's their morality in development.) That's like saying "how do we know how to eat?". Because if we didn't, we'd DIE. I think you need to look up some basic psychology and evolution.
DaFleegsta 7 months ago
Comment removed
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@DaFleegsta “I didn't say arbitrary. Don't put words in my mouth. Our sense of morality develops in our brain. If we were too immoral, we wouldn't be here. We learn morality on both an evolutionary scale as well as a personal growth scale.”
What if you or someone else had experienced a different experience of “personal growth” and come to the conclusion that murder is alright?
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 "What if you or someone else had experienced a different experience of “personal growth” and come to the conclusion that murder is alright?"
That DOES happen, we DO live in a world where some people believe that murder is alright, and they act accordingly. That just proves my statement, that morality is learned, not just magically given.
DaFleegsta 7 months ago
@DaFleegsta @DaFleegsta “Now your catching on. Psychopaths are a great example of this. There is no 'true' morality, only what the majority agrees on. And behaviour is part of evolution.”
So you are, in effect, a moral nihilist?
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 I guess I am a moral nihilist.. I don't believe we're here for any purpose. Why would I?
DaFleegsta 7 months ago
@DaFleegsta That's existential nihilism. I was talking about moral nihilism.
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 Ah my bad, first time I've heard that term before. But yes I'd be a moral nihilist. Our morality is shaped for our survival, nothing else. There is no universal right and wrong.
DaFleegsta 7 months ago
@DaFleegsta @DaFleegsta “Of course not, because thank god we have atheism. I'm saying based on THEISTIC beliefs, not locking your doors would be perfectly fine (not having our own justice system would be perfectly fine).”
Based on theism, not locking your doors would be perfectly fine? How?
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@DaFleegsta I fail to see how that was supposed to show me that I'm NOT right, that just supported my argument. Religion encourages bad decisions.
That was supposed to show that your justice claim about theism was ridiculous.
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@DaFleegsta The reason many theists still 'lock their doors' is because their basic morals conflict with the bible. Real morality triumphs.
Where does the Bible say that believers shouldn’t lock their doors?
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@DaFleegsta If theists evaluate the bible themselves anyway (ie what is reasonable and what isnt), then they don't even need the bible.
There’s your problem. How do you determine objective right or wrong?
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@DaFleegsta That DOES happen, we DO live in a world where some people believe that murder is alright, and they act accordingly. That just proves my statement, that morality is learned, not just magically given.
Then you are, in effect, a moral nihilist. You cannot object to murder.
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@DaFleegsta And not all theists are Christians.
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 "And not all theists are Christians."
I don't remember saying they were.. Forgive me if I accidently implied that somewhere.
DaFleegsta 7 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 Psychopaths and serial killers are a terrible example.. First of all, it depends on why the kill. For the sake of this arguement, I'd assume you mean the reason to be that they're just mentally ill. In that case, their morality (although does harm), is still justifiable TO THEM. There are tons of killers that claim they did it because god told them too (including stories written in the bible), but we as a people have a thing called justice to deal with this.
DaFleegsta 7 months ago
@DaFleegsta You said they should “judge by themselves” between right or wrong, not me. I will ask you again: Do you believe psychopaths should be left to “judge by themselves” between right or wrong?
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 Yes, psychopaths should judge by themselves between right and wrong. Everyone should. But how are psychopaths relevant? There are very few psychopaths in the world, why do you think that is? Psychopaths are mentally ill, so their idea of morality could be just as bad as Gods. Eitherway it doesn't mean we shouldn't take action accordingly. We all have different morals. We are a social species, if enough people disagree, we take action (ie punish or give medical help).
DaFleegsta 7 months ago
@DaFleegsta “Psychopaths and serial killers are a terrible example.. First of all, it depends on why the kill. For the sake of this argument, I'd assume you mean the reason to be that they're just mentally ill. In that case, their morality (although does harm), is still justifiable TO THEM.”
Exactly. How, then, is your subjective sense of morality objectively superior to theirs?
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 Because I believe that mine is the proper morality. Everyone does, but everyone morality is slightly different. The thing is, like I said earlier, if enough of us have the same moral opninion (ie, that psychopath is bad), we'll take action. Usually people have a healthy sense of morality, because as evolution shows, the ones that didn't die off.
Some animals have mental illnesses too, which could harm their species, but most don't, they get along. It's all evolution.
DaFleegsta 7 months ago
@DaFleegsta “Yes, psychopaths should judge by themselves between right and wrong. Everyone should. But how are psychopaths relevant? There are very few psychopaths in the world, why do you think that is?”
How do you consider your subjective sense of morality superior to theirs?
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@DaFleegsta “Exactly. Having a camera (God) as your ultimate source of protection is unhealthy, because that means you have no reason lock your doors (have our own justice on earth). I'm glad you agree with this one.”
That was an example to show you that you are NOT right. That is only what YOU would do if there was an afterlife, not what everyone else would do in the same situation.
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 Of course not, because thank god we have atheism. I'm saying based on THEISTIC beliefs, not locking your doors would be perfectly fine (not having our own justice system would be perfectly fine).
I fail to see how that was supposed to show me that I'm NOT right, that just supported my argument. Religion encourages bad decisions.
DaFleegsta 7 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 The reason many theists still 'lock their doors' is because their basic morals conflict with the bible. Real morality triumphs. If theists evaluate the bible themselves anyway (ie what is reasonable and what isnt), then they don't even need the bible.. Why not cut out the middle man. They can simply decide for themselves what is right or wrong, instead of deciding if a books idea of right or wrong is moral.
DaFleegsta 7 months ago
@DaFleegsta “Because I believe that mine is the proper morality. Everyone does, but everyone morality is slightly different. The thing is, like I said earlier, if enough of us have the same moral opinion we'll take action.”
Just because you believe that yours is the proper morality does not make it so, does it?
Evolution can only explain what is, not how you should behave.
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 "Just because you believe that yours is the proper morality does not make it so, does it?"
Now your catching on. Psychopaths are a great example of this. There is no 'true' morality, only what the majority agrees on.
And behaviour is part of evolution.
DaFleegsta 7 months ago
Comment removed
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@DaFleegsta And I don't think I have ever heard of anyone say that believing in an afterlife eliminates the need for justice on Earth, or for helping others. That only seems to be your personal perspective, not anyone else's.
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 Well then you may want to do some more research.. Not that it matters who or how many people beleive in something; if it's right or not depends on if it's right or not.
If god is going to punish that serial killer anyways, then why should we? God is god, I'm sure he knows what he's doing.
DaFleegsta 7 months ago
@DaFleegsta “If god is going to punish that serial killer anyways, then why should we? God is god, I'm sure he knows what he's doing.”
That's like saying that you should place a camera on your driveway to catch the rapist, but at the same time leave the door to the house open “because you will catch him later anyway.”
CarlosMarti123 7 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 Exactly. Having a camera (God) as your ultimate source of protection is unhealthy, because that means you have no reason lock your doors (have our own justice on earth). I'm glad you agree with this one.
DaFleegsta 7 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 I could go on listing ways that religion do more harm than good, but I think that should be enough to prove my point. It is dangerous when people make decisions based on something that isn't real. The bible itself demonstrates this multiple times.
DaFleegsta 7 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 But Carlos,most science is a religion.
They adhere to a paradigm that in most case is accepted on faith
without direct experimentation by fellow scientist.
Your apparent anger proves that you lack objectivity.
Science is not an end in of itself, it only has meaning if offers
a glimps of truth.
Also there is an attempt by some scientist to give themselves
the unquestioning expert status,which they don't deserve.
Not all scientist are "Rocket Scientist" some are foolish.
fntime 5 months ago
@CarlosMarti123 The intelligent should never show respect to the unintelligent, it merely encourages them to continue holding us all back.
EmperorofCartoons 5 months ago 14
@EmperorofCartoons the "intelligent" should never disrespect people because of there knowledge or lack there of, because it makes you sound like an idiot yourself
classiccafe1 2 months ago
@EmperorofCartoons What a dick
RockyPointMusic 2 months ago
@EmperorofCartoons wasn't it intelligent people who dropped nukes on japan circa 1945? for someone claiming intelligence you really know how to set yourself up. stop holding humanity back.
bulwine 2 months ago
Comment removed
Sciborg09 5 months ago
@Sciborg09 Which is kind of sad seeing as how Carlos hasnt come close to posting anything remotely discernible as coherent statement.
EmperorofCartoons 2 months ago
so i see in the presentation the space-time fabric itself, the field fluctuation inside even empty space...so the emptyness of space-time duality is like a boiling foam?
mariamik104 1 year ago
science is like a fractal no matter how far we go big or mall we will always be faced with an infinite regress or continuum. so if you want to know the truth about this reality please go and eat a jalapeno cream cheese taquito at 7 11. that is truth!
VegetaFedor 1 year ago
ok ok stop who ever that speacker is well sorry but you have to go for now cause you got to keep a stride to your speech and your carying on with big words that come out of no where, trust me on this i love this type of study but you have to have a little more well understanding in the way you explane things........ hey if steven hawking can do it then so can you,.... take a page from his book then apply it, Im telling you a hole world will open up
jomill78 1 year ago
he is talking about standing waves in the Aether, but he has no balls to say the word "Aether"....
nfexp 1 year ago
God is the originator of mass hence the "God particle" aka Higgs Boson. At this point in science it's all theoretical so might as well believe in God. None of this nonsense like string theory or the multiverse could ever be proved.
FallofDarkness55 1 year ago
@FallofDarkness55 neither god...
TheToxicRadio 1 year ago
@TheToxicRadio agreed so why don't you believe in god then? god is just as philosophical as m-theory. btw even if m-theory did exist, i would imagine that the parallel universes and dimensions of space would take on some kind of hierarchy. The "interdimensional" being in the top most universe and dimension would be "God" or the "giant spaghetti monster" for you atheists. lmfao.
FallofDarkness55 1 year ago
@FallofDarkness55 i mean you toss string theory and multiverse out the window,& that it's all theoretical(even though in science a theory is something that has been put up to the test and backed up by scientific methods and calculations), so, might as well believe in god. do you know you just sound like you gave up, many scientists could have given up, but break throughs were still made.. i say we dig deeper and know more, rather than just say, god did it, no need to look any further, the end...
TheToxicRadio 1 year ago
@TheToxicRadio explain to me how string theory or m-theory is science. it's science fiction and to me it's delusional more than the god hypothesis. it's just a theory designed by crack-heads not real physicists; even Einstein believed in God.
FallofDarkness55 1 year ago
@FallofDarkness55 so Dr. Michio Kaku is a crack head, right, i'll make sure to let him know that at his next sermon, and Enstein belived in god? sure why not, that's his opinion but doesn't prove anything, i'm not ruling out the possibility of their being a creator, but i just don't see much going for that, string theory is much more a tangible possiblity(for lack of a better term) in this universe. what i'm saying is, if we just have the might as well believe mentality, then people stop looking
TheToxicRadio 1 year ago
@TheToxicRadio If you are talking about the original string theory then you're wrong, because we know it's wrong.
jakejumpover 1 year ago
@TheToxicRadio I agree with what you said but m-theory still doesn't debunk the god hypothesis. Even if m-theory exists, then ask yourself this, "What created the branes, strings, parallel universes, dimensions, or the multi-verse?" I already know your counter-argument. "What created God?" Well you know how Einstein says time is a dimension. Well maybe time is also a force that is undetectable with an associated particle. Maybe this force doesn't overlap with God hence the reason God's eternal.
FallofDarkness55 1 year ago
@TheToxicRadio continued from previous. why couldn't gravity, EM, strong, and weak forces also be dimensions. In fact Leonard Susskind believes something along these lines. He thinks the reason why gravity is so weak is because of the way the dimensions are wrapped up around each other in the subatomic regime. So if that's the case time could potentially be a force too. Also if there's life in this universe why couldn't there be life in another universe and in the highest possible dimension?
FallofDarkness55 1 year ago
@FallofDarkness55 i totally agree with u on that, other dimensions playing their part, that could b a dffrnt type of force if they break a certain barrier 2 act in our own, however, if we say their is an intelligent designer that was in a different dimension that made our own, were still left with how did that designer come 2 be, it just goes back on & on & on, do i see that as a possibility? sure, i do but anything in between (if there is) should still be looked for. would it still be god here?
TheToxicRadio 1 year ago
@TheToxicRadio maybe there's a dimension entirely devoted to energy, and since energy can neither be created or destroyed energy is simply eternal and merely converts to another type of energy based on the universe that overlaps this dimension of energy. maybe this is how our universe's big bang came about. in my mind though i like to think of god as a form of energy that created everything in the dimensions and parallel universes below it. i'm not saying it's correct. it's only my theory.
FallofDarkness55 1 year ago
@FallofDarkness55 and thank you for actually being competent, and not just spouting crap around, i like seeing people that can think and not just give fuck yous and such... so tip of the hat to you..
TheToxicRadio 1 year ago
@TheToxicRadio I think that's his point
alfakennywon 1 year ago
PSYCADELIC MUSHROOMS IS THE CLORINE !
memeluv3 1 year ago
Comment removed
Joelfwilson2 1 year ago
test
AngstBoy42 1 year ago
There is a better idea…one grounded in reality.
As a Catholic I see that this mystery can be best appreciated by looking right under our noses. Spiritual Energy is a term that is used to describe the Holy Eucharist. (Google: "spiritual energy" Eucharist)
God spoke the words: "Let there be Light" The rest is His story.
MRizzio 1 year ago
@MRizzio THE WORLD IS REALY 4.5 BILLLLLIIIOOOONNNN YYYYEEEAAARRRSS OOOLLD NOT 12000 YEARS OLD OR MABY GOD JUST PUT DINOSOUR BONES HERE JUST TO TEST OUR FAITH BUT IF THERE WAS A GOD I DONT THINK HE WOULD FUCK WITH YOU LIKE THAT!
memeluv3 1 year ago
Then that means you can never believe in anything that hasn't been confirmed in a lab. The world to you must be a hellscape of open debate. It is common sense that there are quadrillions of planets in the universe for example, but our astronomers have only been able to verify that they have detected a few hundred. Under your philosophy there is a chance that there may not be quadrillions of planets in the universe. It's not ok to be wrong about something just because it can't be authenticated.
jmorgan87 1 year ago
Hate those narrowed forehead fundamental religious people coming to a pure science channel and leave their dirty little comments... Always had a question, where did they get a confidence to discuss in a critical manner something they do not understand... Truly magic...
MrAsiansunite 1 year ago 3
Dynamical ? lol
azkeyz 1 year ago
EXCELLENT THANK U FRIEND I SUBBED U
jazzaste123 1 year ago
Nice pictures of a bullet projectial. You are full of crap!
silverpizza100 1 year ago
this is too complicated for the retarded religious brains
72dew 1 year ago 2
@72dew fucking moron
GanEdenAustralia 1 year ago
@GanEdenAustralia why thank you
72dew 1 year ago
@72dew lol hopefully in a thousand years we'll be over this bump in our intellect
1PintLasher 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Grow up you dopes.
Why are we paying these people? If it wasn't for these people your dumb ass wouldn't have a fucking keyboard to type on.
All made by the Grand Designer?? Fuck, all I have to say to that is... It was all made by a big unicorn. And hey you know what? Incidentally Unicorns are much more plausible than some telepathic believe in me or go to hell but by the way i'm all forgiving hypocritical nonsense "God"
We need to clean up this fucking gene pool. Where's the idiot chlorine?
1PintLasher 1 year ago 21
@1PintLasher i think you are the "nonsense" sir!
GanEdenAustralia 1 year ago
@1PintLasher I'm working on that idiot chlorine to clean up the gene pool. Give me a little more time.
kossmikham 1 year ago
Comment removed
Joelfwilson2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@1PintLasher God is whatever you want god to be like food could be your god. but if your talking biblical god name in the bible means tetragrammaton meaning mathematical tetrahedron and gravity that manifests out of everything. so god is not what we think he or it is but it is what is. And love humans, the smart have the responsibility teach and care fore the week minded. lovelessness = man ending man.
Joelfwilson2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@1PintLasher God is whatever you want god to be like food could be your god. but if your talking biblical god name in the bible means tetragrammaton meaning mathematical tetrahedron and gravity that manifests out of everything. god is not what we think he or it is but it is what is. And love humans, the smart have the responsibility teach and care fore the week minded. lovelessness = man ending man.
Joelfwilson2 1 year ago
yes....M E....
IAMCONSCIOUSNESS1 1 year ago
@Piranha180x So you drop a jigsaw on the floor and all the pieces spread everywhere, yet in 4 trillions years time those piece will somehow 'evolve' and move themselves bit by bit with a kind of 'intelligence' to complete the jigsaw? You are thick??
GanEdenAustralia 1 year ago
@GanEdenAustralia Just because you are too stupid to understand the process evolution doesn't mean you get to make up Mr. magic man. that same question applies to your god. God came from nothing? That same logic can be applied to the univers. It came from nothing? No it's the natural process of things. No magic need apply.
ray38montreal 1 year ago
Comment removed
Coeleomic08 1 year ago
First of all, you assume nature had some pre-picture/set pattern of design in mind when it made life. It doesn't. No one made or dropped pieces to a fucking puzzle which makes up the particles of the universe. That's the worst analogy ever. Also, puzzles are meant to be flat when assembled.
You are literally thinking less than two dimensionally.
Coeleomic08 1 year ago
All made by the Grand Designer.
GanEdenAustralia 1 year ago