US president is the Wizard of Oz. But who stands behind the curtain?

[KamikazeKoscki]

All Presidensts have the same DNA and a lot were Freemasons, their God is Lucifer, they tell you what you want to here and then what they want to do, which is to implement a Dictatorship. Their following Albert Pikes blue prints for wars, they were incahoots in WW1, WW2 and soon WW3.

[whydidigetdeleted]

Prescott Bush, (George H W Bush) was convicted for laundering Nazi money. How can any of their family talk about being free from tyranny when they helped finance the worst regime in modern history?

[hijackednation]

this guy almost sense until he starts talking about climate change which Proven fraud. The US is not a democracy it's a constitutional republic. A democracy is 2 wolves and a sheep voting for what's for dinner. A republic protects the interest of the individual whether you are a wolf or a sheep. Itr amazes me how these mainstream journalists are researching info that has been common knowledge in alt media for almost 10yrs.

[ujisx]

Just because somebody writes a book it never mean they know everything. Like what he said basically though. What is saying about the Bush family has been known for quite a while, there is no late breaking news there. Although I am glad somebody traced it back again for themselves and wrote another book about it.

Climate change is another elite fraud and the reason why people cannot afford medical care is because of govt protectionism and interventionism into the free market. Same as always.

[ujisx]

Banker deregulation, what deregulation? You wish. They never site where the so-called deregulation is and then when they find something repealed, they never explain how that proves their point.

The govt is huge, there has never been anything like it in the history of the world and people go believing and telling each other the problem is deregulation?

Clinton repealed the Glass Steagall Act but that did not legalize fraud or have anything to do with the causes and what led to the bank bailout

[BeeGrau]

jeb? oh ffs...

[WelfareRobot]

Don't get distracted by the "climate change" BS. It's not even a part of his book. What is part of his book is actual investigative journalism, which sheds new light on the history of this country going decades back. For just one example, he shows Bush Sr. was working for the CIA and in Dallas the day JFK was killed. Bush Sr. also had presidential ambitions dating back to the 60s, and helped betray Nixon: he wanted to be Nixon's Vice President, and his father Prescott got Nixon into Congress.

[djdnauk1977]

Cap & Trade doesnt work, just another way to take more money from the taxpayers... we need pollution reduction & renewable energy

everything else he says is spot on though, as general smedley butler said "war is a racket, where corporations make money at the cost of peoples lives"

[WelfareRobot]

What a ridiculously articulate guy. I hope he doesn't get suicided. Btw, buy the book: one of the absolute best I've ever read, I'd recommend it to anyone.

[TheFlex21]

this guy says some of the right things, but then he spews climate change propaganda

so this guy is another chump trying to make money off people, don't buy his crap

[RevolutionNewz]

@TheFlex21

yeah... he spent 5 years on investigating bush, yet only 5 minutes investigating man made climate change

[tonydmen1]

great 

[EntinludeX]

"Some may ask..." and some are fucking insane. 

[0Gustave0]

Marina, you could talk about bird shit and I would listen.

[seanboy80]

Please, this is not even a matter of debate. A child can figure this out. It doesn't take a grand conspiracy to know that the president's decisions are greatly influenced by bribes (lobbyists). Not just the president, but members of the House even more so.

[dantronamus]

RUSS Do Your Next Book on ClimateGATE!!! then talk about "climate change"

[EntinludeX]

Who's the master puppet behind the secret shadow government!? Hmmm....could it be....SATAN?! HAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Fuckin fools and their paranoid delusional fairy-tales.

[EntinludeX]

It always comes back to some mysterious unknown satanic evil, doesn't it? These lunatics have no faith in their own divine mysticism so they demonize every terrestrial power as hopelessly corrupt and influenced by satan. Deranged nonsense.

[MarmaladeINFP]

I like this guy. His thinking seems very clear and balanced. He is able to put the pieces together, but he doesn't go off the deep end like your typical conspiracy theorist or rightwing radical. He seems to be criticizing our govt because he actually believes in democracy. I don't get the sense that he is advocating the end of all govt nor for a violent revolution. He understands we are facing real problems such as global warming and pretending like they don't exist won't make them go away.

[yourboycal]

@MarmaladeINFP democracy= 50 % +1 ?

[MarmaladeINFP]

@yourboycal

50% + 1

= Direct democracy

≠ Representative democracy

[yourboycal]

@MarmaladeINFP Representative democracy doesnt represent 50 % +1 for influence?

[MarmaladeINFP]

@yourboycal In a representative democracy, only the representatives are democratically elected. Those representatives then, among themselves, democratically elect or otherwise choose others for positions the public doesn't vote on. The actual decision-making process isn't voted on by the public. The public does influence how their representatives vote, but this influence usually isn't direct. The most influence on representatives comes from special interest groups which represent people.

[yourboycal]

@MarmaladeINFP well do the representatives also not live by 50% +1 ? rule when making decisions for the people who "elected" them?. All you did was transfer the same formula to two differnt levels of a "democracy" are we not talking about the same formula for both apply? if that formula relies on both . then is that all a democracy really is ?

[MarmaladeINFP]

@yourboycal No. In a direct democracy, all decisions effecting the society would be determined by 50% + 1 of the entire population. This is why direct democracy can only at present function in very small communities or groups. In a representative democracy, not all decisions are decided by the public or even by their representatives. Most political positions in our govt aren't appointed by democratic processes including such positions as the military leaders & heads of the information agencies.

[yourboycal]

@MarmaladeINFP Okay but those representatives when they make the decisions. Say its 2 guys who approve of something at 10 who dont ? . Do the two still override? when the 10 refuse? military leaders heads of information agencies all must agree on a certain thing for it to take effect? espically if its national intrest? i see the same formula here...

[MarmaladeINFP]

@yourboycal Many decisions made in the US govt are decided only by one person. This is why we have heads of departments. Even the president makes some decisions on his own. Of course, all these people confer with eachother, with their staff and with experts... or at least you hope they do, not that there is any guarantee that this is what they do. Also, you have to consider the fact that various chains of command exist. Elected representatives only make decisions on the most major issues.

[MarmaladeINFP]

BTW is there a specific conclusion you're trying to argue. I know some conservatives hate the idea of democracy and argue that the founding fathers were against all democracy... despite themselves having set up our govt as a representative democracy. These conservatives think there is a contradiction or conflict between a republic and a representative democracy, but in fact a republic is just any govt that isn't a monarchy & so democracy (whether direct or representative) is a type of republic.

[MarmaladeINFP]

I was getting the sense that you might be implying that democracy is always bad because you seemed to be arguing it necessarily requires majority rule. For whatever reason, some people think having an elite ruling us is better than having the majority rule. Is this your own position? If so, why do you believe this? If not, what are you arguing for in your attempt to equate all democracy to majority rule? Also, do you think non-majority representative democracy is bad or ineffective?

[yourboycal]

@MarmaladeINFP Well im just looking at it from a birds eye view. From the local guys all the way to the top there is the same forumla which governs the kids to play along. The president sure has some alone powers , but he still decides those among his advisors , which is another form of the democracy forumula. But you tell me that formula only applies at a direct level . but it applies to direct and indirect.

[MarmaladeINFP]

@yourboycal From a sociological perspective, it seems I might agree with your general assessment. Humans are social creatures. Even a dictatorship involves some elements of consensus decision-making. In terms of politics, representative democracy could be defined as direct democracy that is limited to a few.

[yourboycal]

@MarmaladeINFP heads of department still talk amongest each other , surley if one head of state pisses off another head of state he will make it a public issue and cry tryanny lol. I think the same 50% +1 system applies even at the top of heads. On top of the international bankers , on top of that the big familys , all have to have some sortof 50%+1 democracy formula to operate. Majoirty wins from the bottoem to the very highest levels.

[MarmaladeINFP]

@yourboycal Are you just arguing that all of society functions on the basis of consensus? I'd agree to an extent. Still, not all consensus is equal. The consensus of the citizenry is, in my opinion, better than the consensus of a handful of the wealthiest men on the planet or the consensus between a dictator & his general. The consensus of a ruling eltie only applies to that ruling elite & isn't a consensus for those they rule over. The closer to the citizenry consensus can be made the better.

[yourboycal]

@MarmaladeINFP Well i first started with demoracy = 50% +1 . Which stands for both direct and representitive. Because even at that level they still have a hirachy and chain of commands that must approve or else they wont be able to carry out there agenda whatever it may be. So can we both agree democracy = 50% +1?

[MarmaladeINFP]

@yourboycal I don't agree with your assessment in a political sense. By defining majority consensus so vaguely, all political systems would have elements of 50% + 1. But there is a massive difference between direct and representative democracy. I might argue there is more similarity between state govts and corporations than there is between direct and representative democracy. An absolute direct democracy would be the ultimate form of anarchism.

[MarmaladeINFP]

As your using the term, 'consensus' simply means that humans are social animals and all societal decisions are made through various social relationships. Humans aren't isolated individuals and so humans, including the highest leaders, always make decisions that are influenced by others often directly such as through discussion. However, using 'consensus' in this way is more sociological than political. I was limiting my explanation of democracy to the political meaning of 'consensus'.

[motorolarules]

Great video. this guy is hitting on all cylinders

[blueorangelettuce]

Fascinating! I've heard all of this before, but to see a more mainstream journalist researching and confirming this is fantastic!

[EntinludeX]

@Photosareawesome Exactly right. Seems the problem with American news media is systemic of the problems of our "two-party system", in that the news just becomes this self-sustaining bipolar or schizophrenic narrative built on a false dichotomy. "Try blue, it's the new red; try red, it's the new blue" and nobody is discussing how to FIX anything. Even so-called independent groups, like the Tea parties or Libertarians seem well funded by right wing partisans. I think the liberal agenda is a myth.

[nonaCbarC]

What the Fuck!!! Until the very end this dude sounded excellent, but at the end this dude talks about medical care & global warming; it's like after making a perfect cake (beautiful icing & fruits, etc) & taking a crap on it. After watching 2/3 of the vid I shared this vid with all my friends. Now, they are gonna think, I'm an idiot. Oh, man, I fucked up. :(

[envisioner]

@nonaCbarC Yeah, WTF???

10:28 "We're not addressing climate change. The way things are going scientists tell us there may be no life on earth in less than 100 years"

Not even the fraudulent IPCC reports say that life will be extinguished in 100 years.

Russ Baker, I suggest you continue your research and look into climategate.



[nonaCbarC]

@envisioner

Yep.

This guy talks about the powerful interests behind controlling everything. But for some reason he thinks global warming BS & healthcare BS aren't anything to do with the power behind, e.g. BP, DuPont is heavily invested in the carbon market, Ford made CCX. Either he has some thought block, or he's a shill.

Cheers, Bro, Sir.

[EntinludeX]

@Photosareawesome Hey, I'm not saying there isn't enough blame to spread all around but blame is always better to give then to receive, especially with an "us vs them" mentality, and that's when those types forget the "we the people" part.

It amuses me how whenever something goes wrong the tinfoilhat types often BLAME invisible "big brother", but PRAY to an invisible "high father". Methinks the anti-psychotic meds aren't working. "Everything is an inside job!" - The Teaparty Battle Hymn

[blite13]

@EntinludeX You need some awakening, you are stuck in the " they work for us" BS. There is a global push for one world government, that is obvious. So, who would want a one world government? Would it be those "behind the curtain"? it's not mentioned but it is plainly there if you look. Who is plundering the economies? Who is taking every dollar with bailouts and taxes and all the rest? Who is creating crisis for their own gain? Look into this, you will find the culprits, follow the cash.

[EntinludeX]

@blite13 U seem quick with the baseless accusations and questions, short on the substance. Where on Earth did I say "they work for us"? Who the hell is "they"? Who wouldn't want a unified global government and humanity? Who do you imagine is behind the curtain intending to create crisis in the first place? Who's the "unseen boogieman" you're angling for, exactly? The Illuminati? the NWO? The CIA or the MIB? Power corrupts so therefore EVERYTHING IS AN INSIDE JOB? Bring some FACTS to the table.

[blite13]

@EntinludeX exactly how am I supposed to provide evidence with a 500 letter Max? NO NO NO, don't be so lazy, look for yourself, or are you shit scared? If you are so brilliant, you could start anywhere with those names you mentioned.... Maurice Strong, George Soros, Rockefeller family, Rothschilds, Albert Pike who is the only person with a statue on the Whitehouse lawn..he was a confederate, how is he the only one on the lawn? You can start with any of those names.

[EntinludeX]

@blite13 Hahaha of course I'm "lazy and scared", that's it!! Or perhaps I'm WORKING for "THEM!" LOL and you can't possibly begin to explain what you know nothing about even without a 500 letter max; stop making excuses. But hurl out a scatter-shot list of high profile names and a statue, well NOW you have a conspiracy! Two can play that game: It's the ILLUMINATI! It's the NWO! It's the FREE-MASONS! It's the TEMPLARS! EVERYTHING IS AN INSIDE JOB! LOL You're as useless as you are ridiculous.

[blite13]

@EntinludeX Yes, check out the history of those groups, check their agendas, check out the Iron Mountain report done in th 60's, it outlines EVERYTHING that is going on today. This has all been planned, all that is going on is to steer the world into conforming. Research the bible and what it says about one world government. You have no idea because you REJECT IT ALL. You reject it because you are too weak to handle it, it's a mechanism weak people use to deny reality. Good luck.

[EntinludeX]

@blite13 EVERYTHING is an INSIDE JOB!! LMAO "the Bible". HAHAHA. Dude if your god has a divine plan and you think you have a heaven waiting for you why for fucks sake do you even CARE about earthly shadow governments? you're totally soft in the head and delusional.

[EntinludeX]

@blite13 PS: The BIBLE says every knee will bow: to one god. So you'd have me trade a mysterious terrestrial totalitarian dictatorship for a mystical celestial totalitarian dictatorship? You're a fucking fool of the highest magnitude. You're the slave: to mythology.

[blite13]

@EntinludeX  says..."Who wouldn't want a unified global government and humanity?" You have got to be kidding, you are a willing slave, sit down and STFU.

[EntinludeX]

@blite13 Obviously, because wanting both a unified peaceful humanity while at the same time finding boarders and countries meaninglessly divisive makes ME a willing slave. Again, I have to ask: a slave to WHO? "The mysteriously un-named THEM?"

LOL. your tinfoil hat is slipping, buddy.

[blite13]

@EntinludeX Bilderberg, CFR, globalists, find out what their agenda is, it's to lower population by BILLIONS, to have the remainder as their slaves. DO SOME RESEARCH, I'm done, it's up to you know, it's not up to me to open your mind, that's up to YOU.

[MikeFromTheUK]

Another excellent, intelligent news report from Russia Today!

[iwantthisfuckingname]

Excellent report and interview. Finally, some truth is being brought out for the public to mull over. Too bad when something other then "main stream" thoughts are aired people call them " tinfoil hat people". Personally, I believe that if you DONT think our country is corrupt beyond belief you need a tinfoil hat. Presidents have been "puppets" for decades.

[EntinludeX]

@iwantthisfuckingname No, it's not that its alternative to the mainstream which grants the tinfoil hat, it's that the fact that claims of "someone else behind the scene" or some "unseen manipulative agency" are quite often utterly baseless, so they reek pf delusional paranoid conspiracy. Nobody is claiming we're living in a UTOPIA, the corruption is obvious. However, you can't go about baselessly crying that "everything is an inside job" or "its the CIA& the MIB" and expect to be taken seriously

[iwantthisfuckingname]

@EntinludeX I agree, it's not ALL an inside job. But it's getting there, don't you think?

I think we have many years of "covert operations" behind us that nobody knows about. Climate Change? Well...last year I had corn growing, this year it wouldn't even sprout and I still have the heaters on and it's almost July, We had snow in the mountains 2 weeks ago...in June?!?! I've got birds in my yard I've never seen before. Is it possible? Seems "changed" to me.

[blite13]

@EntinludeX No, but you can find this info yourself. You can't just say it isn't true because it's a CT. Do the research yourself instead of just labeling it " it can't be" and then tossing it. That's what cowards do, people who are afraid of what they might find, that their reality will be blown out of the water. People are scared of that and the reaction they give is exactly what your reaction is. The corruption is so deep, the forces are so dark, that some won't even look, they are too scared

[EntinludeX]

@blite13 Of course, the super secretive master manipulators behind the scenes left a trail so obvious that clearly I can just find it out for myself and anyone who doesn't think so is a coward! It's so complex that it's SIMPLE! Genius!

Look, I'm not saying "it can't be" I'm saying " Instead of raving about unseen shadow governments like a lunatic and calling everyone who is skeptical a coward, take off your tinfoil hat and present some god-damned evidence!"

[blite13]

@EntinludeX Look at you, you will use any excuse not to look into, " it can't be real cause there wouldn't be a trail". It takes time to find the trail, it is there, just put in the effort like the rest who have unconvered this stuff. Why don't you just listen or read what Brzezinski says to the CFR about controlling and killing the masses, you are lazy and in denial, it's the only way you can cope with this world, I guess.

[EntinludeX]

@blite13 LOL I never said " it can't be real cuz there wouldn't be a trial" I said it isnt' real because you haven't any credible evidence. You're just putting words in my mouth. There have ALWAYS been POWER to control and kill the masses. I'm not denying it because That's NOTHING new in the history of mankind. All you have are insults to anyone who doesn't find your hopelessly vague conspiracies credible. Provide EVIDENCE then we'll talk. Till then you're just a raving lunatic.

[blite13]

@EntinludeX are you going to accept the RFID chip? Of course you will, you are right in line with the satanic agenda, you think you are so clever, when in fact you are lazy and you don't really care. Your life is worthless.

[EntinludeX]

@blite13 There we go, I was waiting for you to say "satanic agenda". All you can do is demonize the unknown shadowy phantoms you chase and allude to some corrupt agenda. You're done.

[dikraneg]

Nothing new under the sun, but still very interesting and accurate comment - up until when he speaks about climate change. That kind of spoiled it for me :-(

[gringodeltoro1]

GOOD JOB RT !

[stephenfritz]

he lost my respect when he started talking global warming and socialized health care. those are part of the globalist agenda.

[28318511]

@stephenfritz - exactly, in an off the cuff slant as if it was a common sense issue too.

[nigahiga0417]

@stephenfritz exactly!

[irshcountry]

Maybe Medvedev should ask himself the samething...."Daddy Putin, can I use the potty?"

[philokiko]

jesuits-illuminatis

[jahood07]

He just should have said the world is run by the illuminati...point blank period

[stonewindimmortal]

Duh.... Explains why Bush won twice.

[DarthSchwartz]

@stonewindimmortal his daddy didn't though lol

[OnenessNow]

This American author has done a great service in writing this wonderful book.

We all look forward to Official First Contact and a complete transformation.

[EntinludeX]

OMG It's the tinfoil hat brigade! EVERYTHING is an INSIDE JOB!!!! lol

[Verm24]

He is just the CEO of the Corporation of the United States of America. The Corporation is bankrupt as well.

[ZedAlfa273]

The bankers control everything, even the Military Industrial Complex. And while I won't go so far as to say that they are all jewish, many of them are. The money controls everything.

[eidius1989]

@ZedAlfa273 dont forget the evangelists those are the true threat to the free world

[mika2oo1]

@ZedAlfa273

The Rockefellers are not Jewish and have been very much against Jewish and Israeli interests. That's a known fact. The Rockefellers (and the Morgans) completely controlled the US for the last 100 years. See: Murray Rothbard's podcasts concerning US economic history. The Rothchilds are Jewish, but they work for the Catholic Church as middleman handling the Catholic Church's money. So in essence, the Rothchilds are the public sock-puppets behind which hides the Catholic Church.

[ukendcx2000]

@mika2oo1 who are the Morgans?

[zapproowsdower]

they're not jewish by religion, nor are they semitic, so I don't see how calling them "jewish families" is valid in any sense. they may present themselves as a jewish family but that's about it.

just say european families, it's far more accurate.

[LibertaerUeberAlles]

@xXDominoXx

Exactly. There's nothing European about them, especially in the ethno-cultural sense. Sure, they resided in Europe for a while, but they were kicked out due to misdeeds by their tribal elites.

Focusing on the Bush family, and the CIA, is nothing more than a diversion from who's really subverting the country.

[DionDifelice]

This book should be amazing ... I can't wait.

.

Way to go RT ... you rock!

[xXDominoXx]

ruling jewish families control this nation, along with this world