Piers Corbyn's Assessment.avi

[chendaforest]

listening to this guy is like a breath of fresh air, and its good to see someone on the left take a public stand against this climate change nonsense for a change. we need public policy to be driven by science and objectivity, not hysteria and vested interest.

[vulcaineli]

Thank you Mr Corbyn. Finally, some long-awaited objectivity in the weather research field.

[shigatsuningen]

It is the duty and obligation for every man woman and child to abolish fraud in scientific research, and equally so to report and chase away the fear mongering taxation fraudster promoting 1010global(DOT)org from ever rearing their ugly Kill-A-Child-For-Money agenda

[Szentelira]

All the more commendable since warmism is a Socialist fraud, and he is manifestly Labour.

[xavier2013]

This is the kind of man that Julian Assange aspires to be.

[Amunrad]

If only guys like this were running the world instead of these bought and paid for smiling lying monsters we end up with.

[senssci]

Interesting science proving and claiming to be more accurate than monitoring of CO2 levels in the atmosphere. It will be interesting to look back in 10 years time and compare. Something to look forward to! I wonder though whether even if his weather predictions are correct that CO2 levels will still have some impact on the planet. Maybe we should be looking into how each side of the argument has a valid scientific repurcussion and finding rather than disclaiming each other as nonsense.

[VenomFrogX]

The person who disliked this video wants to pay more taxes and screw himself up.

[shigatsuningen]

@VenomFrogX

I think you tube could change the buttons on this video to say [Like][Shoot my self in the foot now] ... that would be more attained to a true statement than Al Gore's book

[DAILEYericCaryUSA]

...

Dr. C., thank you for your briliant work. Please do prevail. I learned about you on WUWT. You will advance the whole world. GO.

[hamzyboy]

Well that's really an eco- fascist way to think. Imposing taxes or carbon tax is made to destroy production and development .

[brewbird14850]

@hamzyboy Polluting technologies should pay the FULL COST of their production and use. That includes health and environmental impacts. That's full market fairness, not eco-fascism. Privatizing profits and socializing costs is just wrong.

[brewbird14850]

We should have a pollution tax on all fossil fuel use and use it to pay for renewables. Warming or not, who cares, peak oil is a reality you cannot argue and we'd better start transitioning or we are F-ed.

[PonguigPeopinn]

Your argument is invalid in so many ways.

Firstly, the substitute technology of Nuclear energy is a far cheaper, efficient and more plausible than other technologies.

We have an abundance of nuclear fuel, however the next step is Nuclear Fission, the element for which is available in abundance (Helium-3) upon the moon, and is ejected from the sun in particle bursts. Once we are able to mine this (using Nuclear), we will have free cheap and powerful energy for the next 1,000 years.

[brewbird14850]

Cheaper isn't the issue if it leaves us with radioactive waste. If you can't deal with the waste, it is not a solution.

Maybe a tax on fossil fuels isn't a solution, but we should have incentives and should invest everything we can into renewables, while we still can.

[PonguigPeopinn]

What are you talking about?

Of course we can deal with radioactive waste. We can store it for the duration of its radioactive life. We can use microbes (D. radiodurans) which eat radioactive waste and excrete it in a non-soluable form.

Using biofuels and solar/wind energy is NOT the solution because there is simply no way that these methods will be able to supply enough energy to every human and they take up precious land for growing food.

[brewbird14850]

Store it for the duration? That's an insane idea, you presumptuous human. Even if microbes can deal with ALL Of the waste then I would still have an issue with creating such a deadly substance in the first place. And wind is compatible with food production. Combining wind, solar, biomass, etc would power a smaller, sustainable population. Fossil fuels have allowed over population, which is not sustainable on our limited planet.

[brewbird14850]

@PonguigPeopinn New studies are finding that solar/wind and other renewable can generate most of our energy needs. And without taking up precious food space.

Google this: Energy Self-Reliant States: Second and Expanded Edition

And this: Powering a Green Planet: Sustainable Energy, Made Interactive

[brewbird14850]

@5:27 "Low cost coal fired power stations"? First, you put wind towers where there IS wind. Second, solar's COST includes production of the panels and use, coal's COST is pushed off on the rest of us in the form of carbon emissions and pollution. The point isn't whether the globe is warming or not, it is that we are running out of fossil fuels and they are KILLING us. Your "argument" is pointless.

[5662debbie]

Really like Piers. He makes an awful lot of sense. By the way - on one of his clips he asks where this so called climate change came about. I seem to recall seeing a clip on tv with Margarat Thatcher admitting in an interview given some time ago that she invented it to divert attention to what was going on in the war with Argentina. So, if goods/services are faulty you get your money back, where's our refund in tax for all the money the government has taken from us over this?

[j2hsieh]

SO COOL !

[order9066]

Subscribed.

[wdcsucks1]

is 2012 going to be the year where extreme solar activitie of the sun will damage or even destroy the earth? i think the globalist are going to use these "maya calender prediction" like they are using global warming. they might  set off bombs in the upper stratosphere and claim it is extreme solar activity.

[moveoncitizen]

Any one of the idiots who stands to become Prime Minister in the next election would achieve a LANDSLIDE VICTORY if they stood up NOW and admitted they had been sucked into this and it is a sham, scam, fraud and lie

I have never voted but I promise to vote for any one of our "leaders" who has the balls to stand up to this Goldman Sachs / Al Gore tax theft bullshit. I would even vote TORY if "Call Me Dave" did so

I am afraid it is not likely to happen though, as all they all see are greenbacks

[stormy12321]

Thankyou Piers for exposing the lies and the fraudsters. Keep up the good work, people are starting to wake up

[envisioner]

Piers Corbyn is THE man. Thank God there are still a few REAL scientists engaged in climate theory.

[redsrfreaks]

incasorate all fascist commies now ,"THE ESTABLISHMENT"

[ayre10]

We've been lied to BIG TIME.

Even when the scam has been exposed they just go on telling the lies and simply could'nt give a toss that we know.

[stormy12321]

We the people need to stand up and say that we will not accept their cap and trade, we wil not pay carbon taxes and any politician who dares suggest we should will not get our vote! UKIP with Viscount Monkton are the only true opposition party now!

[FrogJacuzzi]

It's true; UKIP and the BNP have both taken a stand on science. Righties tend to more than lefties. I think we're born left- or right-wing, I'm a born lefty & we need to know ourselves & learn of the common perils of both wings. No view is wrong just for being too left or too right

I look at all issues, immigration to CO2, & can't decide who's least worst. It pains me to admit that for me it might be the Lib Dems. They're so weak on science

UKIP deserve huge recognition on this

[philproductions2210]

Thanks for this report. It should be pointed out that not all main UK parties are avid supporters of the MMGW fraud, as suggested here. Indeed, UKIP have made clear that AGW is not a major factor, and the CRU has been manipulating data.

Over the past decade many scientists have had voice silenced if they stood for the true science and refused to peddle the lie of MMGW. Now the tide is turning. Thank goodness. However, the billions wasted on Al Gore's religion is monumental disgrace

[plappers]

This scruffy prat keeps saying that the cllmate research unit is doing a bad job but never says what is wrong with the data or why it is wrong - just that its crap science - Crap science is using sun spot data to make site specific weather reports - the rest of the meteorological community laugh at Mr Corbyn's forecasts as they are by and large way off the mark and super broad brush.

Prove everyone wrong about global warming - do you own science - and get it published for pier review.

[Szantelire]

@plappers

There is no correlation between carbon dioxide concentration and temperature and there has never been.

On the other hand, there has always been a close correlation between solar activity and temperature. This is elementary statistics.

The warmist scare has been a hoax from the beginning and this could always be known from the socialist politics of those donig the 'research' and their status as institutional government parasites.

[Jockdownsouth]

The rest of the meteorological "community" may laugh at Piers Corbyn but on 23 July 2009 he predicted that January 2010 would be "cold, snowy, especially in North & East, Arctic blasts from north in first half". They laughed then, they were still laughing in November when the Met Office forecast a mild winter. Are they still laughing?

[amanning99]

We are not worthy ! Keep up the good work Piers...love Bern x

[vjGURU99]

I have a hard believing Mr. Corbyn's conspiracy theories. In my opinion the CRU and other climatologists can be simply wrong, without any ulterior motives. I they are cheating they should be sacked and perhaps even tried in a court of law.

Mr Corbyn and others are not yet winning the global debate on climate change. I hope this will change and I hope that the AGW theory will be debunked.

[wrangaton]

At last, a calm explanation of the facts, thank you Piers. I feel we have a short time to get these facts across to those who may have the capacity to reverse the tidal pull of global catastrophe fear factor policies that serve as a new form of international monetary and tax making system leading to an undemocratic power shift of extraordinary proportions. Science has been comprimised for generations through manipulation and deceit so we must find a way.

[HGSpaceTime]

Finally intelligent science thank you Piers Corbyn. Refreshing change from Copenhagen Carbon Jackass Fiasco.

[nickcdart]

Excellent as usual. Thanks so much for putting this up. I only hope that (what with the recent No 1 Christmas song hit business) that Gordon Brown realises as does the Guardian, and the rest of the newspapers not taking climate science seriously and particularly the government propagander mouthpiece, the BBC that the power of the Internet and YOUTUBE should not be underestimated as it's rapidly taking over in the media wars and it represent the feelings of the true people more accurately.

[fox20012]

Seriously these elites are way out of control!

[jamesnolisbon]

Well, done again very informative. However, I enjoyed Mr. Corbyn's video on RT Russian Television where he out smarts WWF Russian Puppet in a debate. I laughed a lot. Cheers.

[collect0r]

brilliant as usual

[noordwinter]

good concise report! ..what angers me the most is the lies & deceit behind their schemes!!

[AfterTheFox75]

Great assessment and message! Thank you

Hell, I'll give five stars just for the hair alone. ;-)

[Kiddolinfen09]

Good vid. Thanks.

[GuildF40]

BRILLIANT !

[ChristiansMustLearn]

Hi Piers

Ive been convinced by your ideas but have trouble explaining the following from sourcewatch

"Usokin, Schussler, Solanki and Mursula -- also found that the correlation between solar activity and temperature ended around 1975. At that point, temperatures rose while solar activity stayed level. This led them to conclude that, during these last 30 years the solar total irradiance, solar UV irradiance and cosmic ray flux has not shown any significant secular trend,

[pierscorbyn]

1. They mix up Electromagnetic radiation with particles. GEOMAGNETIC ACTIVITY (= particles reaching earth) is what is needed. One must also wonder about temps given Climategate

2. The link is MAGNETIC not the 11 yr cycle but 22yr so half the time the 11 yr solar activity cycle and world temps which follow the MAGNETIC cycle will be out of phase

3. Their findings are based on confusion.

4. Have a look at presentations on our website - eg as in WAnewsNos 47 and 80

Thanks Piers Corbyn

[ChristiansMustLearn]

Right. I'll look at that right away. Thanks for you insight and keep up the good work.

[UkTruthSeeker2009]

Great Info Lets hope Gordon Brown sees this video and responds it would be very interesting to hear this go out live and find out the real reason behind all this Global warming stuff and my snowman said he dont want to die hes only just arrived on earth whilst they decide his fate & ours At Copenhagen

[RainstormGB]

thanks Piers great info

[wdcsucks1]

shared this vid with a bunch of friends!

[Catchzoo]

I sign on, to your message.