Russia kicked the most German ass in WWII. I think if we had gone to war with them in 1949 (or after, for that matter), we would have lost. Tenacious doesn't even begin to describe Russian fighting qualities. I always chuckle when I think of the analysts that said that Soviet pilots would be "demoralized by the adverse loss ratio" fighting US F-15's, etc. Did they ever read a history book? Like, about 1940 to 1945? The Nazis took out 1,000's of Russian pilots. And they stomped the Krauts.
U.S marines put down the Phillipine Rebels. why in the hell do u think the colt 45 was made? or the Banana Rebuplic wars. it can be done. and it has been done.
Do you have any idea HOW we won in the Phillipines? We won by going in and commiting mass SLAUGHTER. We burned villages to the ground. There were standing orders to KILL EVERY MAN OVER THE AGE OF 10 when we went it. We executed thousands in retribution when the rebels killed our troops. Hell, you could say the Nazis in Poland and Russia followed our lead. We COULD go and eliminate the insurgency, but only if we're willing to fight like that again. And than what's the point?
What would the world say if we decided to brutally supress Iraqi rebels? We went over there to bring freedom and use atrocity to win? If you start down THAT path, you'd better go all the way. We started an unfair and unjust war with Spain and won. We told the Filipinos that if they rebelled against Spain, we'd give them their country. We betrayed them and slaughtered them. Which insurgency did we beat in South America? Not like it'ss full of armed rebels these days or anything.
and war against the Russians...dude the Finns kicked the shit out of the USSR in the Winter Wars. keep in mind Russia wouldn't have gotten to Germany without the huge amount of Supplies we gave them. and if the USA went to war in 1949 jsut would have nuked them since they didn't have nukes yet. lol.
The Finns are exceptional fighters, and Russia was unprepared for that war. Plus, the Finns merely kept the Russians out. They showed Stalin how hard it is to...eliminate a weaker but determined enemy. Funny how that works, huh? They might not have won without our stuff, but we SURE wouldn't have won if they had lost. US gives the guns, someone else does the fighting. Not that lots of US soldiers didn't die bravely, but if Russia had folded the war would have been over. Same for Britain.
I guess we could have won against the Russians in 1949. But at what cost? Besides, I thought the discussion was about the fighting merits of the 2 countries. Using Nukes against a non-nuclear country would just prove us cowards. Not to mention that it would create hatred for us that would make the Cold War seem nice and friendly. They WOULD have gotten nukes sooner or later, and I'll bet they'd be itching for some payback. Like I said, "winning" is a matter of perspective. Time changes matters.
Propaganda? lol. U.S solder has never really needed Propaganda to fight hard. the last 200 years of history says that. an the U.S Soldier still fights jsut as hard as they have since the country was founded.
well this war has taken longer than WWII and is costing us billions, so how can we wion the war faster?? idk i bet if we had one of our WWII generals in commnad right now like Patton, MacArthur i=or Eisenhower, we would have won this war right from the start.
dude. the U.S has good generals it's rules of war an so forth. your forgetting this is not WW2 every war is different. the military is doing it's job maybe if stupid politics would do there's. also Macarthur was fired for wanting to nuke China lol. I don't blame him but just keep in mind not every war is the same hell we fought for about 7 years putting down the Phillipine Rebels 95% of Americans forgot about that little war. also WW2 for the U.S was only 4 years an WW1 was only 1 year.
Yeah, damn all those civvies! The only thing wrong with this country is all the damn citizens, always going around and exercising their rights and stuff. Why can't they just toe the line?. You sound like Trunchbull in Matilda "the only thing wrong with this school is all the students". LOL, I suppose we could just MAKE everyone join the military, right? Or use the army to make sure no-one complains? Sounds like a great America to me. Seriously, it scares me when people talk like you are.
I actually agree about military service being good for you, and our kids needing to shape the fuck up. But WAR isn't so good for you. Even if you don't catch a bullet, you are scared for life. War will never leave, but it would be nice to have a war that MEANS something. I think Americans are just too good at smelling BS. We pulled together and won WWII, because we HAD to win. Funny, during wartime, this country just about WAS a Fascist state! But that's how we won. Where do you draw the line?
PS- I wish they gave you more than 500 characters; I'm too damn long winded for these little boxes. Anyway, I forgot to say that I purposely deleted "military" and added "army" because I needed a few more letters, and I hate abbriviations. U know what I mean? "LOL", etc. I can deal with, but I guess I've been reading for to long. I cringe at bad spelling and puntuation, but to bitch about it would be absolutly pointless.Soon enough, with all the "texting" etc. we'll have a new written language!
o ok sorry, but still idk why we arent winning this war if in WWII the Nazis were much more harder than Al Qaeda, and plus we have superiuor military technology, its just like star wars, were the empire and trheyre the rebels. empire has better weapons and everything but idk, some weird comparison there but somewhat similar
we are winning. an now what your comparing stuff to a movie? it's a fucking movie. Iraq is a fine example that were winning hell the Iraq's control tge Green Zone. an troops are being shifted towards Afganistan now.
Movies have a basis in reality. The point is that "winning" against an insurgency is way different than winning WWII. WWII=nation vs nation, army vs army. Treaty signed, war is over, we all go home. The "rules of war" are used. Armies have NEVER been good at fighting insurgencies. Well, not at BEATING them; the killing part is easy. Like a dog fighting a bear, only the dog wins if he can just stay alive until the bear gets sick of it (and goes home and says "I won! No dog can take ME down") LOL.
In WWII we wiped out infrastructure and pummelled the population, Nazi or not, into submission. In Iraq we're busy re-building the country and being nice to everyone. If the German people had resisted us after we occupied them, it could have lasted until who knows when. Luckily, they were scared of Russia. And they knew that they got what they had coming, and were tired. Even if we could solve this mess, that won't stop the retards who want to pull out tomorrow. Even if we COULD win, we WON'T.
Propaganda may be a Communist word, but that does not in any way mean that we don't use it. We just call it something nicer. I would think it was becoming obvious now. The US Army is top-notch and can take any army. But beating an army is very different from our job. Unless you clamp down martial law over the whole country (including the remote areas), you won't wipe them out. The Green Zone. Wow, we can sort of secure a perimeter against a bunch of poorly trained rebels! Impressive indeed.
"The Iraq war is damn near right"? LOL, so it's ALMOST a legitimate war? I'm guessing you didn't mean that that way, did you? Which comparison of armies to rebels? The Finns? I was just making a point, that superior power won't always win a war, especially if you mix politics in with it. War is more than just the shooting part. I was just reading about the F-117 that the Serbs shot down. We had stealth, so they "cheated" and used extra-long wavelength radar. War is the mother of invention, see?
is that RED TAIL!! flying i volunteer at the cavanaugh flight museum, shes stationed there for winter
SgtGrant23 2 years ago
guys from US always forget they lost the vietnam war!!!!! becose theres no support,,,
and if was not the russians and the english,they had lost the ww2!
alexandrequinto 2 years ago
Russia kicked the most German ass in WWII. I think if we had gone to war with them in 1949 (or after, for that matter), we would have lost. Tenacious doesn't even begin to describe Russian fighting qualities. I always chuckle when I think of the analysts that said that Soviet pilots would be "demoralized by the adverse loss ratio" fighting US F-15's, etc. Did they ever read a history book? Like, about 1940 to 1945? The Nazis took out 1,000's of Russian pilots. And they stomped the Krauts.
justforever96 2 years ago
U.S marines put down the Phillipine Rebels. why in the hell do u think the colt 45 was made? or the Banana Rebuplic wars. it can be done. and it has been done.
Dogmeat1950 2 years ago
Do you have any idea HOW we won in the Phillipines? We won by going in and commiting mass SLAUGHTER. We burned villages to the ground. There were standing orders to KILL EVERY MAN OVER THE AGE OF 10 when we went it. We executed thousands in retribution when the rebels killed our troops. Hell, you could say the Nazis in Poland and Russia followed our lead. We COULD go and eliminate the insurgency, but only if we're willing to fight like that again. And than what's the point?
justforever96 2 years ago
Continued-
What would the world say if we decided to brutally supress Iraqi rebels? We went over there to bring freedom and use atrocity to win? If you start down THAT path, you'd better go all the way. We started an unfair and unjust war with Spain and won. We told the Filipinos that if they rebelled against Spain, we'd give them their country. We betrayed them and slaughtered them. Which insurgency did we beat in South America? Not like it'ss full of armed rebels these days or anything.
justforever96 2 years ago
and war against the Russians...dude the Finns kicked the shit out of the USSR in the Winter Wars. keep in mind Russia wouldn't have gotten to Germany without the huge amount of Supplies we gave them. and if the USA went to war in 1949 jsut would have nuked them since they didn't have nukes yet. lol.
Dogmeat1950 2 years ago
The Finns are exceptional fighters, and Russia was unprepared for that war. Plus, the Finns merely kept the Russians out. They showed Stalin how hard it is to...eliminate a weaker but determined enemy. Funny how that works, huh? They might not have won without our stuff, but we SURE wouldn't have won if they had lost. US gives the guns, someone else does the fighting. Not that lots of US soldiers didn't die bravely, but if Russia had folded the war would have been over. Same for Britain.
justforever96 2 years ago
I guess we could have won against the Russians in 1949. But at what cost? Besides, I thought the discussion was about the fighting merits of the 2 countries. Using Nukes against a non-nuclear country would just prove us cowards. Not to mention that it would create hatred for us that would make the Cold War seem nice and friendly. They WOULD have gotten nukes sooner or later, and I'll bet they'd be itching for some payback. Like I said, "winning" is a matter of perspective. Time changes matters.
justforever96 2 years ago
keep in mind in WW2 it's called a world war an we were fighting a conventinal war. those are ver easy for the U.S to fight.
Dogmeat1950 3 years ago
This coming from an American, I think our integrity as a people has degraded.
devil952 3 years ago
Amazing real fire show! Great!
nalaiOfFire 3 years ago
Why dont americans fight now as they did 60 years ago?
NavyPilot400 3 years ago
Americans still fight with the spirt they have always fought with. it's the non-military ppl that are the problem.
Dogmeat1950 3 years ago
like congress??? and the house??
NavyPilot400 3 years ago
more like the dumbass Civilains an ya... some ppl in the Goverment.
Dogmeat1950 3 years ago
yeah, and theres no propaganda
NavyPilot400 3 years ago
Propaganda? lol. U.S solder has never really needed Propaganda to fight hard. the last 200 years of history says that. an the U.S Soldier still fights jsut as hard as they have since the country was founded.
Dogmeat1950 3 years ago
well this war has taken longer than WWII and is costing us billions, so how can we wion the war faster?? idk i bet if we had one of our WWII generals in commnad right now like Patton, MacArthur i=or Eisenhower, we would have won this war right from the start.
NavyPilot400 3 years ago
dude. the U.S has good generals it's rules of war an so forth. your forgetting this is not WW2 every war is different. the military is doing it's job maybe if stupid politics would do there's. also Macarthur was fired for wanting to nuke China lol. I don't blame him but just keep in mind not every war is the same hell we fought for about 7 years putting down the Phillipine Rebels 95% of Americans forgot about that little war. also WW2 for the U.S was only 4 years an WW1 was only 1 year.
Dogmeat1950 3 years ago
Yeah, damn all those civvies! The only thing wrong with this country is all the damn citizens, always going around and exercising their rights and stuff. Why can't they just toe the line?. You sound like Trunchbull in Matilda "the only thing wrong with this school is all the students". LOL, I suppose we could just MAKE everyone join the military, right? Or use the army to make sure no-one complains? Sounds like a great America to me. Seriously, it scares me when people talk like you are.
justforever96 2 years ago
Military service should be required. it brings out team work,discipline and respect. unlike to days pop culture that heavily lacks in that area.
it's not students it's certain teachers sometimes. also it's called the military dumb ass, the Army is a branch.
Dogmeat1950 2 years ago
I actually agree about military service being good for you, and our kids needing to shape the fuck up. But WAR isn't so good for you. Even if you don't catch a bullet, you are scared for life. War will never leave, but it would be nice to have a war that MEANS something. I think Americans are just too good at smelling BS. We pulled together and won WWII, because we HAD to win. Funny, during wartime, this country just about WAS a Fascist state! But that's how we won. Where do you draw the line?
justforever96 2 years ago
PS- I wish they gave you more than 500 characters; I'm too damn long winded for these little boxes. Anyway, I forgot to say that I purposely deleted "military" and added "army" because I needed a few more letters, and I hate abbriviations. U know what I mean? "LOL", etc. I can deal with, but I guess I've been reading for to long. I cringe at bad spelling and puntuation, but to bitch about it would be absolutly pointless.Soon enough, with all the "texting" etc. we'll have a new written language!
justforever96 2 years ago
besides Propaganda is a Communist word.
Dogmeat1950 3 years ago
o ok sorry, but still idk why we arent winning this war if in WWII the Nazis were much more harder than Al Qaeda, and plus we have superiuor military technology, its just like star wars, were the empire and trheyre the rebels. empire has better weapons and everything but idk, some weird comparison there but somewhat similar
NavyPilot400 3 years ago 2
we are winning. an now what your comparing stuff to a movie? it's a fucking movie. Iraq is a fine example that were winning hell the Iraq's control tge Green Zone. an troops are being shifted towards Afganistan now.
Dogmeat1950 3 years ago
Movies have a basis in reality. The point is that "winning" against an insurgency is way different than winning WWII. WWII=nation vs nation, army vs army. Treaty signed, war is over, we all go home. The "rules of war" are used. Armies have NEVER been good at fighting insurgencies. Well, not at BEATING them; the killing part is easy. Like a dog fighting a bear, only the dog wins if he can just stay alive until the bear gets sick of it (and goes home and says "I won! No dog can take ME down") LOL.
justforever96 2 years ago
In WWII we wiped out infrastructure and pummelled the population, Nazi or not, into submission. In Iraq we're busy re-building the country and being nice to everyone. If the German people had resisted us after we occupied them, it could have lasted until who knows when. Luckily, they were scared of Russia. And they knew that they got what they had coming, and were tired. Even if we could solve this mess, that won't stop the retards who want to pull out tomorrow. Even if we COULD win, we WON'T.
justforever96 2 years ago
Propaganda may be a Communist word, but that does not in any way mean that we don't use it. We just call it something nicer. I would think it was becoming obvious now. The US Army is top-notch and can take any army. But beating an army is very different from our job. Unless you clamp down martial law over the whole country (including the remote areas), you won't wipe them out. The Green Zone. Wow, we can sort of secure a perimeter against a bunch of poorly trained rebels! Impressive indeed.
justforever96 2 years ago
did U just compare Armies to rebels? please stop talking lol.
U do realise the Iraq war is damn near right? also the green-zone was a government area.
Dogmeat1950 2 years ago
"The Iraq war is damn near right"? LOL, so it's ALMOST a legitimate war? I'm guessing you didn't mean that that way, did you? Which comparison of armies to rebels? The Finns? I was just making a point, that superior power won't always win a war, especially if you mix politics in with it. War is more than just the shooting part. I was just reading about the F-117 that the Serbs shot down. We had stealth, so they "cheated" and used extra-long wavelength radar. War is the mother of invention, see?
justforever96 2 years ago