Indeed its fake vedio...all seems set up....bt nizami,golam ajom or sayeedi are 1ce traitors n ass lickers of pakistan.......thrs no doubt abt tht fact.....
@all, use your brain. Razakars wanted to protect the disintegration of their country against the Mukti Bahini. These God fearing people can not indulge in senseless violence against their own people. Mukti Bahini had scores of members who were Hindus. The way eyes were goged out, female breasts cut, children thrown in fire; these are the ways of fundamentalist Hindus. Muslims of Gujarat India were killed by Hindus in exactly the same fashion.
tini asole dekheni Motiur Rahman Nizami ke ..eta bolar opekkha rakhe na..kintu tai bole Motiur Rahman je Razakar na seta kintu na...o je Razakar ete kono sondeho nai..Shanti committee netting e se cilo.. tar pic oi aj na ami onk coto thkete dekhici ..Jamat Sibir ki pare na deshbashir kace khoma cheye ar dole war criminal der borkhassto kore shustho rajnity korte..
heh heh he...! Now they want to prove Nizami was a Freedom Fighter, or what? There is no single incidence in the country that people calling someone 'a rajakar' without a reason. Poverty caused this poor fellow (and many others at that time) to join in rajakar. No wonder he may tell a story for money. Most interesting story is ''Nizami was not a rajakar''! Let him prove that in the court then. Cheap videos will barely be able to protect him.
@muktokorovoy Brother,Never mind......If somebody wasn't participate in freedom fight is not mean that He is Rajakar.......And we shouldn't mix up with the two terminology ''Rajakar'' and ''War Criminal''.I think you got my point,otherwise you might say ''All Rajakar is not War Criminal,But the people on that time committed offence's against humanity was war criminal'' It is irrelevant who was in Jamaat or Awamileague.
Indeed its fake vedio...all seems set up....bt nizami,golam ajom or sayeedi are 1ce traitors n ass lickers of pakistan.......thrs no doubt abt tht fact.....
minhazshaon24 5 days ago
brothers can some one translate what is he saying in english
tariqshamsi 2 months ago
moitta rajaker er bachar kaida nai .ei shob faltu jinis public khai na vai.
wasiurinusa 2 months ago
Shit!! What a heinous act by some disgusted, rejected people to the pious, religious leader Nizami.
patriot99bd 5 months ago
@all, use your brain. Razakars wanted to protect the disintegration of their country against the Mukti Bahini. These God fearing people can not indulge in senseless violence against their own people. Mukti Bahini had scores of members who were Hindus. The way eyes were goged out, female breasts cut, children thrown in fire; these are the ways of fundamentalist Hindus. Muslims of Gujarat India were killed by Hindus in exactly the same fashion.
asherfawad 5 months ago
tini asole dekheni Motiur Rahman Nizami ke ..eta bolar opekkha rakhe na..kintu tai bole Motiur Rahman je Razakar na seta kintu na...o je Razakar ete kono sondeho nai..Shanti committee netting e se cilo.. tar pic oi aj na ami onk coto thkete dekhici ..Jamat Sibir ki pare na deshbashir kace khoma cheye ar dole war criminal der borkhassto kore shustho rajnity korte..
hemonto21 7 months ago
Plzz,change the culture..........change the bloody culture of this (Bangladesh) country in politics........................
asdfghjkl81685 10 months ago
I think this tv channel guys are threating the poor old man...
I can see fear in the old man's eye, at the same time light smile on his face...
panghosh 1 year ago
Fouck awami leaugh
pervez2106 1 year ago 2
ai briddher nirapottar var ke nibe?
nasimkhan71 1 year ago
Comment removed
kaushik121990 1 year ago
heh heh he...! Now they want to prove Nizami was a Freedom Fighter, or what? There is no single incidence in the country that people calling someone 'a rajakar' without a reason. Poverty caused this poor fellow (and many others at that time) to join in rajakar. No wonder he may tell a story for money. Most interesting story is ''Nizami was not a rajakar''! Let him prove that in the court then. Cheap videos will barely be able to protect him.
muktokorovoy 1 year ago
@muktokorovoy Brother,Never mind......If somebody wasn't participate in freedom fight is not mean that He is Rajakar.......And we shouldn't mix up with the two terminology ''Rajakar'' and ''War Criminal''.I think you got my point,otherwise you might say ''All Rajakar is not War Criminal,But the people on that time committed offence's against humanity was war criminal'' It is irrelevant who was in Jamaat or Awamileague.
MrSe700658 2 months ago
Please Telecast it all TV Chanel
DARUM99 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We will see what happens.
abdullahalbaki 1 year ago
shame !!! shame!!! game with an old person....shame on all of u....
KANON395 1 year ago
OMG ....WHAT a trick by awami league ....
bohurupi75 1 year ago