@MetalBru01 Yeah, what jfindo said. Colbert Report is correctly (for the sake of this show anyway) pronounced "coal-bare re-pore". Dropping the 't' is purposeful, and a running gag on the show. Stephen even calls his sports report, "spore repore"
Cont. Compare the real fossil to the replica. The real fossil lhas a conveniently missing back end & tiny frontal fins. The replica has long, strong, muscular frontal fins at least 5X larger than the fossil's, for its supposed amazing transition to land. The artist also added in some kind of leg-fins such as are never seen in nature to further help Tik climb to land. Ken Miller, a major evo-evangelist, uses the fossil & replica & says, Tik "is as good as it gets" for a "transition". So true.
Cont. Since the labs & real world don't back them up, evo is replete with phony art work. This started with Haeckle's admittedly fraudulent "ontology recapitulates phylongy" drawings still being promoted as truth by some today. Bill Nye The Science (?!) Guy shows the usual ape to man "sequence" based on 0 evidence at all. Google Melbourne Museum's Repliaca of Titaalilk. Cont.
Cont. They say the nylon eating bacteria is an ex. of evo. But when placed in normal ponds it goes right back to its former eating habits. Not only that it is still a bacteria! Not only that it never even changed its species! Yet they say it is PROOF of evolution. Gazillions of bacteria, algae & other micro organisms reproduce at rocket rates yet, like the fish & tetrapods, the EVIDENCE shows they stay what they were. They are still bacteria & algae, etc. 100% of tiems. Cont.
1:45 "But labeling that belief as science is not...." Again, it is the evolutionists who are labeling their beliefs as science. Almost never do they rely on actual observations of nature, much less use the scientific method - or if they do the exact opposite is seen. For ex. they say that bacteria are evolving because some become more resistant to disease. But all they really show is an inate ability of life (which they can't really explain) to adapt to a LIMITED extent. Cont.
0:50 Oh what a horrible man. He wants his children to hear both sides & learn
to...gasp!...think for themselves! But evoutionists fight in court
to make sure no one even suggests that - gasp! - there might be something supernatural behind the creation of the universe & life. They haven't got a cuhloo how time, space, matter, energy or life got here - , tho some are now teaching it all came from...nothing! One thing they are sure of - only their side gets to be heard if they can help it. Cont.
ANYONE: If you see no responses to some posters it is because of their use of personal insults, name calling & crude obscenities. Some of them follow me around from vid to vid on YT with such tactics - like transatlantic for ex. If you want to rephrase anything they said to make the same points, and can avoid the verbal abuse, I will be happy to respond. I debate where true debate is possible, with those who are civil & objective.
Cont. They have 0 evidence it ever had any descendants different in any significant way whatsoever from itself. (This goes along with phony "evoution" art work but maybe more on that later.) They also tell us that fins & fish turned into feet & tetrapods & scales & tetrapods turned into feathers & birds. Oops! Billions & tons of fossils show no such thing, only 100% of each every time. No, don't let the state force its religion on your kids folks - all the while calling it "science".
There is actually 100 evidence that it had descendants different in many significant way. Visit a natural history museum. all there. What "phony art work"?
Some fish do have fins that look like proto-feet and proto-hands. pick a biology textbook.
feathers, birds...all that directly observed just by visiting a natural history museum.
Billions, tons of fossils, just visit a natural history museum.
FACT IS: do you have any other explanation to plant speciation, that isn't Evolution?
Cont. And don't tell me about "peer reviews" & "all scientists believe" because as with the M & U experiment, they often give great peer reviews & teach things to little kids that are simply lies & psuedo science. Then there is the way they teach their magical belief that they can look at a fossil & tell you how its invisible descendants' invisible descendants reproduced. For ex. they state as FACT not conjecture that Tiktaalik's descendants turned into tetrapods. It was 100% fish. Cont.
Ofc i'll tell you about peer-reviews. M & U experiment was to prove chemical evolution, not biological evolution. apples and oranges. What lies? what pseudo science? all we have is a moron like you failing to prove anything.
Look at fossils? sure: kids go to the natural history museum and they observe directly that fossils have a gradual change of forms. what "invisible descendants"?
it is a fact that Tiktaalik's share a common ancestor with tetrapods. it's a fact.
Cont. Yes, it is a Law because 100% of times throughout history life has been observed only to come from life, 0% of times from inorganic matter. But evolutionists have...faith....that it must have happened. So Miller does not correct Colbert but is silent. Don't tell me "Evolutionists don't doooo abiogenesis." B.S. From Darwin on it has been talked about, Miller & Urey tried to prove it & failed, it's all over the media & in kids' "science" books on evo in school lilbraries. Cont.
And no..."law of biogenesis" isn't any law. it isn't written in any biology textbook. check it out.
actually 100% of times throught history not one single present species didn't appear by evolutionary mechanisms from a parent species. Abiogenesis is a different thing from Biological evolution.
ALL present species share a common ancestor, we didn't appear out of nothing. 250,000 years ago we appeared by speciation, evolution, from a parent species.
Cont. Yes, evo is a religion since it pushes magical belief in the invisible, all the while calling it "science." Some cases in point: They say there is evi evidence in the "Geologic Column" but one can't find any such column anywhere except on paper. On Colbert's show Colbert mentions the primal pond theory. There was a great "teachable moment" for Miller, the scientist mto inform him that there is 0 SCIENTIFIC evidence for any such thing! It's against the LAW of biogenesis. Cont.
Cont. No, evolution is not a religion. Can you explain Plant speciation without using evolution theory? no? therefore it is not religion. What do you call the theory that explains how species change by random mutation and natural selection? indeed...Evolution theory.
Therefore it is science. We observe random mutations and natural selection.
"except on paper", pure lie. Visit any in field natural history museum.
From the 1st sentence this vid is in error. There is no "separation of Church & state" mentioned in the Constituion. In fact the Constitution actually is providing for religious freedom and the prevention of a state run religious system such as was seen in the Papacy before the Protestant Reformation. Now evo- evangelists are trying to force a state religion - that of evolution - on the populace all the while violating the Constitution & others' freedom of speech & religion. Cont.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
This means separation of church and state. Evolution isn't a religion. it's science.
@illinoislibertarian exactly, shouldn't they be praying for their welfare? If they believe god will solve all their problems then they should only need to pray for their health. Let's instead provide welfare for non-believers instead since they don't have "god" backing.
@shudson555 Wrong! There is no evidence for intelligent design, if you have some, then you will be world famous. There is overwhelming scientific support from every branch of science for evolution. Evolution requires no faith only common sense and the ability to understand data. Your willing to put fairy tales on par with science? I do not want my kid's time wasted learning ID anymore than they should have to learn about uniorns or fairies.
Bobby Jindal translation: "Many of my fellow Cajun/Creoles want to grow up in a Puritian Christian society with NO freedom to make decisions for yourself."
@LiberalViewer -- Nice one. I know it's a bit out of your normal realm, but it's good to see you hitting on something as vital as faith v. reason... The more, the merrier.
Actually. Creationism is not even science it is religious hearsay.
Creationism have zero studies, zero proof, barely any credibility. The reasons atheists are standing up is that religion have now becoming a poison in society. It split society and the religious oppress the non-religious.
When children dies and becomes ignorant because of religion, it is a fairly clear warning that religion is now practiced as truth.
The reason that evolution is only a theory is becuase it also cannot be irrifutably proven. I am not pro I.D, but it is as well proven that the dinosuars were wiped out by an asteriod. There is strong proof but no diamond hard data. We should not refute anything until it has a reason besides Darwin said it.
@alfman881 Wow. You dont' know the evidence for evolution do you. Evolution is a theory and so is every scientific theory. THEORY in science is the grand daddy because it has been accepted by a concensus. You are confused and thinking of a hypothesis. A hypothesis hasn't been proven. Theories in science have been proven. Evolution has been proven and we know all life has a common ancestor by the same means as DNA testing could prove who your cousin is.
Teach you damn kids creationism in Sunday school , but for god sake keep it out of the class room so the intelligent children have a chance to become scientists and continue to find cures for diseases, and update those cell phones,computers and all other scientific based conviences you have become so accoustomed to.Move into the country and stay there till Jesus comes but don't come to town for those scientific based cures everytme you get sick. Just pray and tell yourself God will cure you.
@levonet33 You: "evolution is a communist ideology"
I'm very interested to know exactly what was your source for this statement. Where did you read/hear it? What page? Who's the author? When was it published? Who published it? Is it an interpretation, or did you actually glean this directly from documents written by communists? Please cite/list specific passages.
I guess what I'm looking for is the actual evidence that led you to your opinion. Thumbs up mate--the truth will out.
It's my child and I should be the one to decide what my child will study and not some bureaucrats.Let thenm teach their children whatever they like.Period
@levonet33 So correct and incorrect information are not part of your consideration about what to teach children? Would you want your children to be taught something that was essentially a lie, or demonstrably untrue?
In response to the last question this video proposes: Even though I myself am an atheist, I'm going to play devil's advocate here. Science does not necessarily go against god. In fact, it's completely silent on such a thing. But for the sake of argument, lets say a god does exist for a second. Evolution and the laws of the Universe could be just another way that this god or deity goes about its work. Perhaps such a being could have merely laid down these laws at the beginning and let them run.
@Tripockets Come on tell the truth. You don't seriously believe that creationist crap do you? All the evidence points to evolution. Nothing points to I.D. That's not opinion ,that's fact. Sorry but your bible thumping buddies have snowed you good.
One more comment on this video and I'm done. The fact is that the "Theory of Evolution" is still be repressed by Christians in America. Teachers are in fear of losing their job just for teaching it as a plausible theory, not fact, just the best case scenario. Intelligent design aside which has no place in science because it is not supported with any scientific evidence, scientific study is still be suppressed in 2010. Teach religion in your household, don't try and bring it into the classroom.
.. Pardon? There are so many things wrong with what Miller said i have to conclude that he is either a liar or the dumbest person on the planet. First of all, the idea that science is limited is not only a theological statement but a fucking scientific statement. Science itself tells us that science is limited. So we shouldn't tell the kids that part of science? God forbid we tell the children that we're only human.
@knowwaie Wouldn't science only be limited by our technology. And as we can never really know everything, and science is the search for knowledge, science knows it can never know everything or else it would stop.But it never will as long as humanity exists. Maybe longer. And as theistic beliefs seem to radically harm real science and education, it is a good thing that most institutions of higher learning are more atheistic then the American public educational system.
"it is a good thing that most institutions of higher learning are more atheistic then the American public educational system."
The fraternities. Conservative Americans have been saying for years that the Colleges teach a very, atheist, Marxist, sometimes even cultist. Of, course you have no shame in defending communism, i'm sure.
Your "higher education" will result in another communist revolution and another dictatorship, thanks again, we all appreciate your contribution to our destruction.
@knowwaie Of course conservatives say that. They are biased. I live in a more socialist country then you, Canada, and its more atheistic also. I dont remember any communist revolution here. We also have a lower crime rate, better educational system, better standard of living and we are in the top ten of happiest population. The U.S.A. was around # 50. And if the conservatives had their way you would be living in a theocracy. And all theocracies are corrupt.
@KingSlimjeezy Its the level of corruption and the level of irrationality you have to be careful of. Bush had no problem sending his soldiers to their deaths because he thought they would go to heaven. And gives tax money to a crap-load of churches who were not required to show what they did with the money. Talk about a double header of corrupt stupidity.
They're arguing against indoctrination with their own doctrines. Postmodernism, liberalism and Marxism which are commonly favored among our atheistic universities. Should we indoctrinate children with liberalism or Marxism? They already have. They've been 'indoctrinating' everyone with all these things for hundreds of years.
These people would have to be bat shit retardedly insane to not see the hypocrisy they represent.
@Trapar137 again Galileo, Copernicus nothing bar nothing to do with what we were discussing! Can you not stick to a point and defend your original statements and address my actual objections?
@Trapar137 "I clearly answered your statement," no you did not answer my question. Could you please do so? Should I repeat it? How can we start over by now talking about a subject that was not the issue in the first place? How did points made by you about the notion of a flat Earth morph into Geocentricism? There were 3 issues on the table, none of them were Geocentricism. Stop trying to introduce new issues without settling the first.
@Trapar137 I will repeat my question because you did not answer it: you claimed,”Evolution is taught as a theory, not as a fact" So a scientist would never say in a calm lucid moment, with plenty of time to reflect, "Evolution is a fact. Beyond reasonable doubt, beyond serious doubt, beyond sane, informed, intelligent doubt, beyond doubt evolution is a fact"? And IF they did, you would surely not be right in your claim?
@Trapar137 you're doing it again; shifting ground mid-argument. You claimed, "Evolution is taught as a theory, not as a fact" I then asked you a very straight forward question, about that statement, not about 'proof'. I asked you a very clear IF > WOULD question, but you did not answer it, saying, "I don't know where your going"! Can you answer my question and stay within the bounds of the concepts spoken of?
@Trapar137 you claim, "Evolution is taught as a theory, not as a fact" So a scientist would never say in a calm lucid moment, with plenty of time to reflect, "Evolution is a fact. Beyond reasonable doubt, beyond serious doubt, beyond sane, informed, intelligent doubt, beyond doubt evolution is a fact"? And IF they did, you would surely not be right in your claim?
@Trapar137 dude your arguments are all over the place and yet you claim to be the one fighting for science and painting me as antiscience. How in the name of reason did the notion of a flat Earth change into the notion of geocentrism? That was a nice attempt at Alchemy on your part.
Empirical thinking is something that is simply not compatible with a religious frame of mind. The Empirical system is entirely based around proving ideas with proof. Religion is the total reciprocal to this. "Faith" is the basis of religion and "faith" is against everything Empirical thinking stands for. Science isn't just about how the world works, it also teaches a mode of thinking. It makes you ask questions and prove things beyond a shadow of a doubt before you blindly believe in them.
If we want to bring Intelligent design, why stop at just Christian ideas? Why not also teach Islamic ideas, Hindu's ideas, and also Flying Spaghetti Monsters' idea too? Heck, even Marvel Comics has its own version of intelligent design.
@Trapar137 "I wonder why Newton waited to introduce his ideas until just before he died" Newton didn't. He died aged 84 and was publishing his works way way before that. I wonder why you said this.
@Trapar137 "Do people forget that during the golden age of Christianity, people thought the world was flat" No they did not, so it is impossible to forget, as it was not a fact to be remembered in the first place. Even Aristotle believed and taught the Earth was spherical; that is over 360 years before even the birth of Christianity yet alone “its Golden Age.” You speak as one who still believes The Columbus Flat Earth Myth. I am not even Christian and I am saying this to you.
@Tripockets A little suggestion : borrow a science book from any 15 - 16 year old in your neighbourhood, borrow a 15 - 16 year old to read it to you.
Nobody suggests we "evolved from monkeys" - its a common creationist chant but is totally moronic & shows their inability to comprehend even simple science
@brospec hang on second; it is you that does not understand the tenets the Theory. Darwin said in The Decent of Man that man evoved from Old World Monkeys. Even Richard Dawkins in his lastest book, The Greatest Show on Earth said we evolved from monkeys. Yet you inanely say, "Nobody suggests we 'evolved from monkeys'" If Tripockts had said it was black, you would say no white and if he said white you would say black
at 1:07 Jindal says "I certainly want my kids to be exposed to the very best science. I don't want [any] facts or theories or explanations to be withheld from them because of political correctness."
Those two sentences strike me as contradictory. Either you trust the scientific community to weed out the bullshit or you don't. How the hell is a teenager qualified to tell the difference between good science and crap.
Jindal and his ilk are the ones constantly trying to use the levers of government to interfere with and override science. His "political correctness" comment was just plain stupid. He's just pandering to his base.
Well we have the government subsidize everything already why not that which challenges science. For example we teach global warming as man made no question despite other scientists disagreeing. In fact because of science we have kids thinking the world is going to be powered by wind and solar power of course were not based on the ability for those technologies to actually achieve that goal. Scientists have every ability to lie or be wrong about what is possible and not.
@Tripockets weve been classified as apes in taxonomy LONG before Darwin came into the picture, long before the theory of evolution by natural selection even appeared. youre a joke dude hahaha^^
@Ilikenuman your critique here is nonsense. The theory says we evolved from other animals but we are still classified as animals. In fact it says we evolved from chordates but we are still chordates. That we evolved from primates, but are still primates. Indeed it says we evolved from monkeys via other apes. So of course it says we evolved from apes; that we are still classified as apes makes no odds, just like we are still classified as animals doesn’t mean we didn’t evolve from animals.
creationism is bunk from beginning to end, theres no science behind it atall. Creation "scientists" like Hovind start with a conclusion, then try to find ways to make it plausable, yeah thats real scientific there aint it?
@Atheist603 sorry didn't finish a sentence there. "The fact that 40% of scientists are theistic" speaks to the fact that you can both be a scientist and believe in god.
you can be a scientist and believe in all kinds of bat shit things, but when you start trying to pass it off as science are you even a scientist anymore?
@Hexdoll Hmm. Are you aware of scientists trying to pass religion off as science? I would agree. But I don't think that any real scientists would do that. Dr. Miller certainly doesn't. In his testimony at the Dover trial he humorously said that the Red Sox's trip to the World Series in 2004 might have been divine intervention, but that wasn't science. I would say that any scientist trying to say religious stuff is scientific are those stupid "Creation scientists"
Religion is not incompatible with science per se, but it is incompatible when it's a religion based on faith (this in contrast with religions based on philosophical concepts).
Faith = not wanting to know what is true and accepting dogma instead. Science = trying to figure out what's true. Thus, both are incompatible.
@OutOfTheBoxThinker Albert Einstein ~Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind. (1879-1955) interesting quote that goes along with post.
Faith is the substance of things hoped 4, but works best with trust ...the more u trust the more u can have faith. I put my faith in prevention and natural medicine because I don't trust those funding science, and education. I know 4 a fact there is a plot 4 1world gov with 1 currency, & 1 world religion through UN & the Vatican. :)
@MajesticCyru : Quoting Einstein? Well, two can play that game. A year before he died, Einstein wrote : "The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this."
IAnyway, ALL religions are forms of mind control. Religion is all about a self-proclaimed elite telling others what to do and think.
@OutOfTheBoxThinker Oh I knew u would go there... but when & why did he change his mind?
"ALL religions are forms of mind control. Religion is all about a self-proclaimed elite telling others what to do and think."
Y & N 2 your point. This may b why Einstein changed his mind, but why I trust Jesus 4 railing against religion & 4 throwing out the money changers. He tore down the temple & rebuilt it in 3 days. He was & still is the greatest threat 2 these hypocritical or religious leaders.
one of literally 100's of video clips that show 1000's of hours of evil demonic alien lifeforms pouring into the gulf through a rift. Atheism/Satanism are 100% accountable for putting all of humanity in imminent danger of extinction. Hell has been loosed upon humanity and yet ackmonra thinks he will not be held accountable for his Godforsaken lifestyle that doomed humanity. Atheist/Satanists are fully responsible for their attack on God, Country and Humanity.
The Torah has a verifiable digital pattern proving the authors digital signiture. Simlar patterns in Holy Bible and Quran. Your scientific fact of no less the 20,000 humans any one time is grossly unsupportable. You are exactly what your first proved yourself to be, a filthy evil Satanic Nazi Shill.
First 2 books count 5+2 and circle
Last 2 books count 7-2 and circle
Middle book count 7 and circle
~Each Hebrew character circled totalling thousands spell Torah, Middle Book over & over~
100% of humanity entered this world as a child of God, after living a lifetime of choices that define what we grew to become, it rather obvious we are to exit the world as we entered it, only knowing how to love and be loved.
I can reduce my Gods enemies back to the infants they were when born and recognize their attacks are out of ignorance. On that level I can forgive, but not merely stand aside allowing them to assault their creator, The One God, The Father Almighty
Actually every child born is an Atheist - as they have yet to be informed of the existance of any God. Children raised in India don't ever hear of Jesus, often because their parents have never heard of him either. Christianity is not by a long stretch the default for a human being.
By all means - enlighten me if you have compeling evidence for your God that can stand up to the kind of honest skepticism and detailed scientific investigation i am capable of.
Read your own answer. Even given all the information to answer it correctly, you still are oblivious. Attaining Divine Wisdom. You can't even relate to the concept, even provided exactly what is required to achieve it. Divine Wisdom, Absolute Confirmation of God by His Holy Spirit. The evidence is absolute and exactly what Jesus Christ promised, stressing the urgency of why He must return to the Father. To ask He send the Holy Spirit in His name, to fulfill His promise. Such a pity
Gave you every every thing you need to achieve Divine Wisdom. If you can not grasp the concept from what I have provided, there is nothing I can do. your soul is in serious jeopardy and you fail to recognize that, not wise. not wise at all.
Reading through this post log your ego must have an insatiable appetite that drives you to publicly display your ignorance. Olivious to what constitutes Divine Wisdom inspite of writing an epistle of ignorance attempting to answer the defining question. Plato wrote a brilliant definition and you failed to comprehend why Wisdom was capitalized. You have no standard beyond oblivious and you achieve that standard long before you complete a thought.
Prove God doesn't exist to support your insanity having breached your fundamental commitment to the truth which resulted in the fatal logic error revealing you to be a fundamental liar and fraud. I'm not the one who made an arbitrary & subjective decision to dismiss God as a possibility, you are. What scientific fact you use to support your choosing to dismiss God? You have none. You did it based on arbitrary and subjective reasoning, yet claim scientific. You are a fraud.
Its easy - the bible states that God created the first 2 Human being.
Through genetic evidence we know there were never fewer than 20,000 human beings at any one time.
Therefore; the God of the bible dosn't exist as described in the bible.
I'm open to some god existing - and for you to prove that he/she/it does. But i've already eliminated the God of the bible for more reasons than i can fit in 400 characters.
Torah, the book you attempt to diminish has a digital pattern proving the authors digital signiture and simlar patterns are found, Holy Bible and Quran. Your scientific fact of no less the 20,000 humans anyone time is an unsupportable lie. you are a filthy Satanic Nazi Shill.
First 2 books count 5+2 and circle
Last 2 books count 7-2 and circle
Middle book count 7 and circle
Each Hebrew character circled totalling thousands will spell TORAH, the Middle Book over & over
stealing children to mutilate in your Satanic Rituals is murder you know and your Godforsaken doctrine feeds that pipeline. Nice homepage friends list swimming in Satanic symbolism. If you can get people to believe collect teddy bears and the stack of tricycles in the back yard is an art sculpture won't even have to wipe the kids blood off the walls.
You don't like the truth because it does shed a light on who and what you are. I call it like I see it and you have said nothing that doesn't prove exactly what I have stated. Don't like the visual imagery of what your responsible for? Neither do I and allowing you to slither around promoting it without having to recognize responsibility is all too convenient. You promote an attack on God, Country & Humanity 24/7. I stood for what you attack my entire life so have the majority.
What is your twisted excuse for a friends list swimming in Satanic symbolism? A picture is worth a 1000 words and speaks volumes about exactly who and what you are. An evil filthy Satanic Nazi Shill who has the hypocricy to blaspheme God and religion while blatantly worshipping Satan.
half assed Satanic excuse to promote a doctrine of a genocidal maniac and a direct assault against God, US Constitution and humanity. Claiming to have intelligence and then twisting a completely unsupportable lie as genetic evidence that supports your decision to arbitrarily dismiss god and lie. No surprise though, your a Satanic/Atheist and your all fundamental liars. What a Satanic Nazi Clown
The Torah has a verifiable digital pattern proving the authors digital signiture. Simlar patterns in Holy Bible and Quran. Written thousands of years ago with a pattern so complex can not be duplicated by a modern author with a wordprocessing program and a computer.
First 2 books count 5+2 and circle
Last 2 books count 7-2 and circle
Middle book count 7 and circle
Each Hebrew character circled totalling thousands spell Torah, Middle Book over & over
Plato defined Wisdom, as "a condition of the soul" that has an affinity with that which it is familiar, becoming drunk when in it's presence. Plato capitalized Wisdom to be subtely recognized. In the contest of Plato's brilliant definition consider the following. "Would a wise man question the Wisdom of God?"
Responses range from a *Divine simple No, to oblivious epistile's of ignorance.
Divine *Wisdom = Recv'd Holy Spirit /Confirmation of God = His Gift, Jesus Christ Promise to all
No he proves himself not to be wise at all because he does not possess Divine Wisdom. Divine Wisdom is denoted by being capitalized. To be truly wise one must attain Divine Wisdom. Plato could not have written his definition without it and you would still be filling out a blue book while those with Divine Wisdom received an A and you awarded a failing grade several minutes later for your epistile of ignorance.
The demonic evil alien lifeforms pouring into the gulf are 100% the responsibility of Godforsaken Atheists/Satanists/Evolutionists. Those Nazis doomed humanity and first need to answer to humanity then God.
Wake; its crude oil polluting the gulf - not any form of living matter.
And for your information its quite easy to disprove all of humanity's current Gods because their discriptions are inconsistant; conflicting and all the evidence we have disproves all claims about them.
That isn't to difficult to understand. I'll even demonstrate for you if you tell me exactly which version of Judaism/Christianity/Islam you follow.
@ackmonra <---------Insane Evil Satanic Nazi. Ya right 1000's of hours of video footage and can even watch realtime and all those scientists are lying. you are an evil Satanic Nazi and pathetic
I'm sane enough to form coherent sentances, which is more that can be said for yourself so far.
I'm not entirely evil.
I don't believe Satan exists.
And i'm not a member of any Nazi party past or present.
What footage are you talking about?
Why would scientists lie? Scientists who lie couldn't discover or invent anything.
So what are you doing? Does lying and being incomprehensible give you some kind of pleasure? Using lies and confusion is supposed to be the devil's way.
Tell me wake - are you interested in listening to anything that i have to say? You seem to be quite happy simultaniously ignoring me and calling me names like a child on a playground.
If you don't want a discussion i'll leave you to your ways.
You plan on continuing to promote the Satanic Agenda in light of the truth, by ignoring it? Or, you going to take responsibility for your actions and do the right thing? I can offer you my forgiveness, but you need more then mine. I'm not final judge, He is and lucky for you He is an extremely warm, Wise and loving God. Good luck and be sincere.
From what I gathered Miracles don't have an order of magnitude. A miracle is a miracle.Transgressions, however do have and once the action is recognized by the person to be a sin against God yet they continue to do so then the magnitude of the transgression grow. How much, that is not clear, but indication is it is logrithmic. Big time, huge. To continue your attacks against God, knowing He exists is a Major sin against God. Be wise, your soul is in jeopardy.
I in all honesty don't believe - i don't deny because i see nothing to deny.
That is what an atheist is - and we exist by the millions.
Its strange to me that you can believe in a God for which there is no compelling evidence yet deny the existance of an entire kind of people because they don't fit into your world view.
Atheists are honestly skeptical - no devilry or denial.
Game over, if eliminate God through Satanism/Atheism so goes all men were created equal and Liberty and Justice for All. Result the one that warned of the other was the truth and humanity bought an Evil Illusion the product of Godforsaken Atheists/Satanists who are an enemy of God & a threat to US Constitution and Humanity. Satanists obliterated the scientific standard of irrefutable evidence with a Hoax.Led to Demonic Torture at Abhu Gharib & ritualistic mutilation stolen children by Satanists
I am an atheist and i had Creator, two infact - my parents; and they had their creators; their parents.
Also - Atheists don't "forsake" God - they've either never met/heard of a specific God, or they just see no compelling evidence and are therefore honestly unable to believe.
It sounds to me like you've swallowed a lot of propoganda with regard to people who arn't of the same religious view as yourself.
@ackmonra <-----Will be held accountable by humanity and God for crime against humanity ~~~~~~~~~~~are eels dna changing~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Evil demonic alien lifeforms pouring into gulf. Atheists/Satanists/Evolutionists couldn't disprove God so they opted to prove Satan. Hold them 100% accountable.
The demonic evil alien lifeforms pouring into the gulf are 100% the responsibility of Godforsaken Atheists/Satanists/Evolutionists. Those Nazis doomed humanity and first need to answer to humanity then God.
Basic 101 fundamental logic & simple. A commitment to the truth (the only sane choice) inherently expands to include all possibilities. Arbitrary dismissal of a possibility breaches that commitment as a fatal logic error proving the person fundamentally a liar & a fraud. When an Atheist dismisses the possibility of God, they breached their commitment to the truth, resulting in the mindfucked insanity to argue justifying a lie, is rational behavior.
@questionsamson I agree, I'm an Atheist and as far as I'm concerned he's everything a Christian should be. When he talks to someone, or responds to a question, he actually uses real words instead of some 20 minute babble about the great powers of the lord and some completely unrelated or out of context bible quote or many times debunked "evidence". The video of him talking about Dawkins is awesome, respectful, and an excellent example of what Science should be. He is a badass educator too.
Ah, I love how stupid conservatives in this country say that they "believe" in freedom, equality, and democracy, but before you know it they are attempting to shove religion down our throats. Is there ANY scientific evidence for intelligent design? ANY?! No, there is not. Therefor, god doesn't exist, and evolution and the big bang, because of there PHYSICAL SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, are real. And people can't use the bible as proof of I.D.. that's called "argument from faith", and it's pretty shity
good video. of course science and religion are not incompatible. but if your view of religion is very literal (i.e. form religious texts) then there is some incompatibility. i await the day we are all able to free ourselves of the confines of religiosity.
I'd more compare intelligent design to affirmative action than welfare because rather than go through the peer reveiw process that every other scientist has had to go through these creationists just wanna skip the whole thing and get their junk science right into the textbooks which is unfair to all the real scientists who've done all the hard work to just move creationists to bypass the system like that.
Yes they are incompatible. The idea of faith is flawed. It is the opposite of science. Faith is believing without evidence. Science is believing because of evidence. These two ideas are incompatible for a sane person and a healthy society.
@MrBossnagger No. You're confusing incompatibility w/territory assignment. Religion shouldn't try to answer scientific questions and science shouldn't try to answer religious questions. Miller wrote a great book, "Finding Darwin's God" where he explains the common ground. Science describes how the natural world works. Faith comes in on philosophical/spiritual questions. This is the same thing Creationists (Discovery Institute) try to do, drive a wedge between science and religion.
@Atheist603 The issue is that science will not comment one way or the other if religion is a fantasy or not. I personally don't see anything wrong with accepting all scientific discoveries and then just saying "That's how God did it." The fact that 40% of scientists are theistic. Granted that's a lower percentage than the general population but that is a testament to the two being compatible. Since most people believe in a God of some sort it's important for common ground.
@artman2oo3 well that's 40% of scientist in the US, not worldwide. Europe is much less than that. and if you look at the highest ranking scientist it's actually 93% don't believe in god or personal god etc.. i personally think the reason why most pplz believe in gods is bcuz of fear, they wanna believe that there's someone out there lookin out 4 them. I mean to think about it nature is scary, i mean to see how many species have gone extinct, reality is hard, that why pplz make up god to cry to
@SCRulerShinoda Not necessarily. Sure, it can. The Creationist movement today, burning people at the stake centuries ago for saying the Earth isn't the center of the universe, yes religion often impedes science. However, sometimes a reverence for the beauty of God's creation can inspire somebody to have the desire to figure out how it works and that is what has motivated some scientists.
You have little humanity, faith isn't a scientific test you must undergo in order to decide what you know as the truth, it is a personal journey into the depths of our existence beyond what the physical world can tell us. It is the pinnacle of the human experience. I know my God to be real, i cannot say that for you, but for me i see his reality on a different level than the physical world. Saying there is no god is narcissistic, as you limit existence to your own physical world.
@MrBossnagger scientists believe that consciousness arises from an arrangement of matter. They believe this without evidence. So is that not faith too and not science?
@allan3141 " scientists believe that consciousness arises from an arrangement of matter. They believe this without evidence. So is that not faith too and not science?" No. Scientists believe this with the benefit of evidence. Neurochemical tests, experimental data, neuroelectrical experimentation and testable predictions. Where did you get the idea that it was without evidence?
Many things defy Man's rationale as his intellect simply isn't big enough. The answer from corporate religious fanatics, of the 21st century, to all things mysterious & contrary is: EVOLUTION. To Darwin's caretakers: It's incumbent upon the person making any claim to bring forth evidence.
@Primordialfan1 is this as consistent as you seem to imply? I mean; he believes in a Designer, but believes there is no evidence of design, but still further believes that Designer is not deceptive. That surely is not a position that is self-evidently consistent. Why does he believe in a Designer any way, does he just do it willy nilly and without any evidence or rational grounds?
Even Jesus himself backed the idea of the separation of church and state when he said: Give unto Caesar what is Caesar's and God what is God's.
It's a shame that Christians constantly misrepresents their own supposed 'Lord and Savior'. They allow dogma and their own sense of superiority to destroy Jesus' message about peace, love and forgiveness and instead spread ignorance, intolerance and even hatred. I don't think Jesus would approve in the least.
@MetalBru01 it is how Stephen Colbert says it, so it is scilent like in his name
jfindo884 1 month ago in playlist More videos from LiberalViewer
Why do you always make the "t" in 'report' silent?
MetalBru01 1 month ago
@MetalBru01 Yeah, what jfindo said. Colbert Report is correctly (for the sake of this show anyway) pronounced "coal-bare re-pore". Dropping the 't' is purposeful, and a running gag on the show. Stephen even calls his sports report, "spore repore"
Lugh314 3 weeks ago
Cont. Compare the real fossil to the replica. The real fossil lhas a conveniently missing back end & tiny frontal fins. The replica has long, strong, muscular frontal fins at least 5X larger than the fossil's, for its supposed amazing transition to land. The artist also added in some kind of leg-fins such as are never seen in nature to further help Tik climb to land. Ken Miller, a major evo-evangelist, uses the fossil & replica & says, Tik "is as good as it gets" for a "transition". So true.
LoricaLady 2 months ago
Comment removed
LoricaLady 2 months ago
Cont. Since the labs & real world don't back them up, evo is replete with phony art work. This started with Haeckle's admittedly fraudulent "ontology recapitulates phylongy" drawings still being promoted as truth by some today. Bill Nye The Science (?!) Guy shows the usual ape to man "sequence" based on 0 evidence at all. Google Melbourne Museum's Repliaca of Titaalilk. Cont.
LoricaLady 2 months ago
Comment removed
LoricaLady 2 months ago
Cont. They say the nylon eating bacteria is an ex. of evo. But when placed in normal ponds it goes right back to its former eating habits. Not only that it is still a bacteria! Not only that it never even changed its species! Yet they say it is PROOF of evolution. Gazillions of bacteria, algae & other micro organisms reproduce at rocket rates yet, like the fish & tetrapods, the EVIDENCE shows they stay what they were. They are still bacteria & algae, etc. 100% of tiems. Cont.
LoricaLady 2 months ago
1:45 "But labeling that belief as science is not...." Again, it is the evolutionists who are labeling their beliefs as science. Almost never do they rely on actual observations of nature, much less use the scientific method - or if they do the exact opposite is seen. For ex. they say that bacteria are evolving because some become more resistant to disease. But all they really show is an inate ability of life (which they can't really explain) to adapt to a LIMITED extent. Cont.
LoricaLady 2 months ago
0:50 Oh what a horrible man. He wants his children to hear both sides & learn
to...gasp!...think for themselves! But evoutionists fight in court
to make sure no one even suggests that - gasp! - there might be something supernatural behind the creation of the universe & life. They haven't got a cuhloo how time, space, matter, energy or life got here - , tho some are now teaching it all came from...nothing! One thing they are sure of - only their side gets to be heard if they can help it. Cont.
LoricaLady 2 months ago
ANYONE: If you see no responses to some posters it is because of their use of personal insults, name calling & crude obscenities. Some of them follow me around from vid to vid on YT with such tactics - like transatlantic for ex. If you want to rephrase anything they said to make the same points, and can avoid the verbal abuse, I will be happy to respond. I debate where true debate is possible, with those who are civil & objective.
LoricaLady 2 months ago
Comment removed
LoricaLady 2 months ago
Cont. They have 0 evidence it ever had any descendants different in any significant way whatsoever from itself. (This goes along with phony "evoution" art work but maybe more on that later.) They also tell us that fins & fish turned into feet & tetrapods & scales & tetrapods turned into feathers & birds. Oops! Billions & tons of fossils show no such thing, only 100% of each every time. No, don't let the state force its religion on your kids folks - all the while calling it "science".
LoricaLady 2 months ago
@LoricaLady
There is actually 100 evidence that it had descendants different in many significant way. Visit a natural history museum. all there. What "phony art work"?
Some fish do have fins that look like proto-feet and proto-hands. pick a biology textbook.
feathers, birds...all that directly observed just by visiting a natural history museum.
Billions, tons of fossils, just visit a natural history museum.
FACT IS: do you have any other explanation to plant speciation, that isn't Evolution?
transtlantic 2 months ago
Cont. And don't tell me about "peer reviews" & "all scientists believe" because as with the M & U experiment, they often give great peer reviews & teach things to little kids that are simply lies & psuedo science. Then there is the way they teach their magical belief that they can look at a fossil & tell you how its invisible descendants' invisible descendants reproduced. For ex. they state as FACT not conjecture that Tiktaalik's descendants turned into tetrapods. It was 100% fish. Cont.
LoricaLady 2 months ago
@LoricaLady
Ofc i'll tell you about peer-reviews. M & U experiment was to prove chemical evolution, not biological evolution. apples and oranges. What lies? what pseudo science? all we have is a moron like you failing to prove anything.
Look at fossils? sure: kids go to the natural history museum and they observe directly that fossils have a gradual change of forms. what "invisible descendants"?
it is a fact that Tiktaalik's share a common ancestor with tetrapods. it's a fact.
transtlantic 2 months ago
Cont. Yes, it is a Law because 100% of times throughout history life has been observed only to come from life, 0% of times from inorganic matter. But evolutionists have...faith....that it must have happened. So Miller does not correct Colbert but is silent. Don't tell me "Evolutionists don't doooo abiogenesis." B.S. From Darwin on it has been talked about, Miller & Urey tried to prove it & failed, it's all over the media & in kids' "science" books on evo in school lilbraries. Cont.
LoricaLady 2 months ago
@LoricaLady
And no..."law of biogenesis" isn't any law. it isn't written in any biology textbook. check it out.
actually 100% of times throught history not one single present species didn't appear by evolutionary mechanisms from a parent species. Abiogenesis is a different thing from Biological evolution.
ALL present species share a common ancestor, we didn't appear out of nothing. 250,000 years ago we appeared by speciation, evolution, from a parent species.
transtlantic 2 months ago
Cont. Yes, evo is a religion since it pushes magical belief in the invisible, all the while calling it "science." Some cases in point: They say there is evi evidence in the "Geologic Column" but one can't find any such column anywhere except on paper. On Colbert's show Colbert mentions the primal pond theory. There was a great "teachable moment" for Miller, the scientist mto inform him that there is 0 SCIENTIFIC evidence for any such thing! It's against the LAW of biogenesis. Cont.
LoricaLady 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LoricaLady
Cont. No, evolution is not a religion. Can you explain Plant speciation without using evolution theory? no? therefore it is not religion. What do you call the theory that explains how species change by random mutation and natural selection? indeed...Evolution theory.
Therefore it is science. We observe random mutations and natural selection.
"except on paper", pure lie. Visit any in field natural history museum.
Abiogenesis is not Evolution.
transtlantic 2 months ago
From the 1st sentence this vid is in error. There is no "separation of Church & state" mentioned in the Constituion. In fact the Constitution actually is providing for religious freedom and the prevention of a state run religious system such as was seen in the Papacy before the Protestant Reformation. Now evo- evangelists are trying to force a state religion - that of evolution - on the populace all the while violating the Constitution & others' freedom of speech & religion. Cont.
LoricaLady 2 months ago
@LoricaLady
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
This means separation of church and state. Evolution isn't a religion. it's science.
transtlantic 2 months ago
WELFARE FOR CREATIONISTS!?
Who needs that? None of them should get any.
illinoislibertarian 6 months ago
@illinoislibertarian exactly, shouldn't they be praying for their welfare? If they believe god will solve all their problems then they should only need to pray for their health. Let's instead provide welfare for non-believers instead since they don't have "god" backing.
Relativisticism 4 months ago
Comment removed
shudson555 7 months ago
@shudson555
go to goole scholar and type in evolution, I can't post the link but that should be a start for you
CDragnetti 4 months ago
Comment removed
shudson555 7 months ago
Comment removed
shudson555 7 months ago
@shudson555 Wrong! There is no evidence for intelligent design, if you have some, then you will be world famous. There is overwhelming scientific support from every branch of science for evolution. Evolution requires no faith only common sense and the ability to understand data. Your willing to put fairy tales on par with science? I do not want my kid's time wasted learning ID anymore than they should have to learn about uniorns or fairies.
MrKGatl 7 months ago
Remind me again why we bother to keep these conservatives around?
skoockum 7 months ago
Bobby Jindal translation: "Many of my fellow Cajun/Creoles want to grow up in a Puritian Christian society with NO freedom to make decisions for yourself."
Mandilore 8 months ago
bobby jindal is an indian DICK!!!
halflifeproductionz 8 months ago
So...Liberal Viewer DOES acknowledge that welfare recipients are like intelligent design advocates...
Mrparrot73 8 months ago
@LiberalViewer -- Nice one. I know it's a bit out of your normal realm, but it's good to see you hitting on something as vital as faith v. reason... The more, the merrier.
skoockum 9 months ago
And what exactly is America's leadership position in world science?
Battleganz 9 months ago
Actually. Creationism is not even science it is religious hearsay.
Creationism have zero studies, zero proof, barely any credibility. The reasons atheists are standing up is that religion have now becoming a poison in society. It split society and the religious oppress the non-religious.
When children dies and becomes ignorant because of religion, it is a fairly clear warning that religion is now practiced as truth.
Prayer over medicine? You kidding me?
Neosaigo 9 months ago
Not forgetting the fact that Intelligent Design is just al load of bullshit
thejcjmguy 10 months ago
The reason that evolution is only a theory is becuase it also cannot be irrifutably proven. I am not pro I.D, but it is as well proven that the dinosuars were wiped out by an asteriod. There is strong proof but no diamond hard data. We should not refute anything until it has a reason besides Darwin said it.
alfman881 10 months ago
@alfman881 yes but Darwin didn't just say it, he proved it.
thejcjmguy 10 months ago
@alfman881 Wow. You dont' know the evidence for evolution do you. Evolution is a theory and so is every scientific theory. THEORY in science is the grand daddy because it has been accepted by a concensus. You are confused and thinking of a hypothesis. A hypothesis hasn't been proven. Theories in science have been proven. Evolution has been proven and we know all life has a common ancestor by the same means as DNA testing could prove who your cousin is.
Fishqueen1972 9 months ago
evolution is a proven science. they may as well teach their children about the flying spaghetti monster
ec123456789able 10 months ago
Teach you damn kids creationism in Sunday school , but for god sake keep it out of the class room so the intelligent children have a chance to become scientists and continue to find cures for diseases, and update those cell phones,computers and all other scientific based conviences you have become so accoustomed to.Move into the country and stay there till Jesus comes but don't come to town for those scientific based cures everytme you get sick. Just pray and tell yourself God will cure you.
21shasiti 10 months ago 3
The children should be learning FOR and AGAINST any theory.The rest is USSR type of a dictatorship. evolution is a communist ideology
levonet33 11 months ago
@levonet33 You: "evolution is a communist ideology"
I'm very interested to know exactly what was your source for this statement. Where did you read/hear it? What page? Who's the author? When was it published? Who published it? Is it an interpretation, or did you actually glean this directly from documents written by communists? Please cite/list specific passages.
I guess what I'm looking for is the actual evidence that led you to your opinion. Thumbs up mate--the truth will out.
skoockum 9 months ago
It's my child and I should be the one to decide what my child will study and not some bureaucrats.Let thenm teach their children whatever they like.Period
levonet33 11 months ago
@levonet33 So correct and incorrect information are not part of your consideration about what to teach children? Would you want your children to be taught something that was essentially a lie, or demonstrably untrue?
ianman6 11 months ago
In response to the last question this video proposes: Even though I myself am an atheist, I'm going to play devil's advocate here. Science does not necessarily go against god. In fact, it's completely silent on such a thing. But for the sake of argument, lets say a god does exist for a second. Evolution and the laws of the Universe could be just another way that this god or deity goes about its work. Perhaps such a being could have merely laid down these laws at the beginning and let them run.
opiates 1 year ago
"Our leadership position in world science"?
Are you nuts?
ana8woahhh 1 year ago
I recant my position. I'm not longer a liberal atheist but instead am now a conservative christian.
How much do I get?
pchtermino1 1 year ago
@Tripockets Come on tell the truth. You don't seriously believe that creationist crap do you? All the evidence points to evolution. Nothing points to I.D. That's not opinion ,that's fact. Sorry but your bible thumping buddies have snowed you good.
alianchild 1 year ago
One more comment on this video and I'm done. The fact is that the "Theory of Evolution" is still be repressed by Christians in America. Teachers are in fear of losing their job just for teaching it as a plausible theory, not fact, just the best case scenario. Intelligent design aside which has no place in science because it is not supported with any scientific evidence, scientific study is still be suppressed in 2010. Teach religion in your household, don't try and bring it into the classroom.
Trapar137 1 year ago
"lose our leadership position in world science"
.. Pardon? There are so many things wrong with what Miller said i have to conclude that he is either a liar or the dumbest person on the planet. First of all, the idea that science is limited is not only a theological statement but a fucking scientific statement. Science itself tells us that science is limited. So we shouldn't tell the kids that part of science? God forbid we tell the children that we're only human.
Ken Miller is an imbecile.
knowwaie 1 year ago
@knowwaie Wouldn't science only be limited by our technology. And as we can never really know everything, and science is the search for knowledge, science knows it can never know everything or else it would stop.But it never will as long as humanity exists. Maybe longer. And as theistic beliefs seem to radically harm real science and education, it is a good thing that most institutions of higher learning are more atheistic then the American public educational system.
alianchild 1 year ago
"it is a good thing that most institutions of higher learning are more atheistic then the American public educational system."
The fraternities. Conservative Americans have been saying for years that the Colleges teach a very, atheist, Marxist, sometimes even cultist. Of, course you have no shame in defending communism, i'm sure.
Your "higher education" will result in another communist revolution and another dictatorship, thanks again, we all appreciate your contribution to our destruction.
knowwaie 1 year ago
@knowwaie Of course conservatives say that. They are biased. I live in a more socialist country then you, Canada, and its more atheistic also. I dont remember any communist revolution here. We also have a lower crime rate, better educational system, better standard of living and we are in the top ten of happiest population. The U.S.A. was around # 50. And if the conservatives had their way you would be living in a theocracy. And all theocracies are corrupt.
alianchild 1 year ago 19
@alianchild well said... RE..your "McCain, Republicans Want Welfare for Anti-Evolutionists?" comment..
paulspydar 1 year ago
@alianchild and all govornment is corrupt, whats your point?
KingSlimjeezy 4 months ago
@KingSlimjeezy Its the level of corruption and the level of irrationality you have to be careful of. Bush had no problem sending his soldiers to their deaths because he thought they would go to heaven. And gives tax money to a crap-load of churches who were not required to show what they did with the money. Talk about a double header of corrupt stupidity.
alianchild 4 months ago
@alianchild the smaller the government is the less there is to be corrupted
KingSlimjeezy 4 months ago
@KingSlimjeezy But less people in government to catch the corruption of others. Its a fine line either way.
alianchild 4 months ago
They're arguing against indoctrination with their own doctrines. Postmodernism, liberalism and Marxism which are commonly favored among our atheistic universities. Should we indoctrinate children with liberalism or Marxism? They already have. They've been 'indoctrinating' everyone with all these things for hundreds of years.
These people would have to be bat shit retardedly insane to not see the hypocrisy they represent.
knowwaie 1 year ago
Comment removed
Trapar137 1 year ago
@Trapar137 again Galileo, Copernicus nothing bar nothing to do with what we were discussing! Can you not stick to a point and defend your original statements and address my actual objections?
allan3141 1 year ago
Comment removed
Trapar137 1 year ago
@Trapar137 "I clearly answered your statement," no you did not answer my question. Could you please do so? Should I repeat it? How can we start over by now talking about a subject that was not the issue in the first place? How did points made by you about the notion of a flat Earth morph into Geocentricism? There were 3 issues on the table, none of them were Geocentricism. Stop trying to introduce new issues without settling the first.
allan3141 1 year ago
@Trapar137 I will repeat my question because you did not answer it: you claimed,”Evolution is taught as a theory, not as a fact" So a scientist would never say in a calm lucid moment, with plenty of time to reflect, "Evolution is a fact. Beyond reasonable doubt, beyond serious doubt, beyond sane, informed, intelligent doubt, beyond doubt evolution is a fact"? And IF they did, you would surely not be right in your claim?
allan3141 1 year ago
Comment removed
Trapar137 1 year ago
@Trapar137 you're doing it again; shifting ground mid-argument. You claimed, "Evolution is taught as a theory, not as a fact" I then asked you a very straight forward question, about that statement, not about 'proof'. I asked you a very clear IF > WOULD question, but you did not answer it, saying, "I don't know where your going"! Can you answer my question and stay within the bounds of the concepts spoken of?
allan3141 1 year ago
Comment removed
Trapar137 1 year ago
@Trapar137 you claim, "Evolution is taught as a theory, not as a fact" So a scientist would never say in a calm lucid moment, with plenty of time to reflect, "Evolution is a fact. Beyond reasonable doubt, beyond serious doubt, beyond sane, informed, intelligent doubt, beyond doubt evolution is a fact"? And IF they did, you would surely not be right in your claim?
allan3141 1 year ago
@Trapar137 I have never had anyone remove ALL their comments before. What's with that?
allan3141 1 year ago
Comment removed
Trapar137 1 year ago
@Trapar137 dude your arguments are all over the place and yet you claim to be the one fighting for science and painting me as antiscience. How in the name of reason did the notion of a flat Earth change into the notion of geocentrism? That was a nice attempt at Alchemy on your part.
allan3141 1 year ago
Empirical thinking is something that is simply not compatible with a religious frame of mind. The Empirical system is entirely based around proving ideas with proof. Religion is the total reciprocal to this. "Faith" is the basis of religion and "faith" is against everything Empirical thinking stands for. Science isn't just about how the world works, it also teaches a mode of thinking. It makes you ask questions and prove things beyond a shadow of a doubt before you blindly believe in them.
reedf1 1 year ago
If we want to bring Intelligent design, why stop at just Christian ideas? Why not also teach Islamic ideas, Hindu's ideas, and also Flying Spaghetti Monsters' idea too? Heck, even Marvel Comics has its own version of intelligent design.
sihsobhk 1 year ago
Comment removed
Trapar137 1 year ago
@Trapar137 "I wonder why Newton waited to introduce his ideas until just before he died" Newton didn't. He died aged 84 and was publishing his works way way before that. I wonder why you said this.
allan3141 1 year ago
@Trapar137 "Do people forget that during the golden age of Christianity, people thought the world was flat" No they did not, so it is impossible to forget, as it was not a fact to be remembered in the first place. Even Aristotle believed and taught the Earth was spherical; that is over 360 years before even the birth of Christianity yet alone “its Golden Age.” You speak as one who still believes The Columbus Flat Earth Myth. I am not even Christian and I am saying this to you.
allan3141 1 year ago
@Tripockets A little suggestion : borrow a science book from any 15 - 16 year old in your neighbourhood, borrow a 15 - 16 year old to read it to you.
Nobody suggests we "evolved from monkeys" - its a common creationist chant but is totally moronic & shows their inability to comprehend even simple science
brospec 1 year ago
@brospec hang on second; it is you that does not understand the tenets the Theory. Darwin said in The Decent of Man that man evoved from Old World Monkeys. Even Richard Dawkins in his lastest book, The Greatest Show on Earth said we evolved from monkeys. Yet you inanely say, "Nobody suggests we 'evolved from monkeys'" If Tripockts had said it was black, you would say no white and if he said white you would say black
allan3141 1 year ago
@Tripockets WOW...........you are seriously stupid dude
brospec 1 year ago
Evolution is "the very best science", creationism is not science in any manner.
LikeALeadZeppelin 1 year ago
why do men have nipples???
TAKEMARU666 1 year ago
Part 1)
at 1:07 Jindal says "I certainly want my kids to be exposed to the very best science. I don't want [any] facts or theories or explanations to be withheld from them because of political correctness."
Those two sentences strike me as contradictory. Either you trust the scientific community to weed out the bullshit or you don't. How the hell is a teenager qualified to tell the difference between good science and crap.
->
fusedchromosome 1 year ago
Part 2)
Jindal and his ilk are the ones constantly trying to use the levers of government to interfere with and override science. His "political correctness" comment was just plain stupid. He's just pandering to his base.
fusedchromosome 1 year ago
Well we have the government subsidize everything already why not that which challenges science. For example we teach global warming as man made no question despite other scientists disagreeing. In fact because of science we have kids thinking the world is going to be powered by wind and solar power of course were not based on the ability for those technologies to actually achieve that goal. Scientists have every ability to lie or be wrong about what is possible and not.
LokiScoutSniper 1 year ago
@Tripockets weve been classified as apes in taxonomy LONG before Darwin came into the picture, long before the theory of evolution by natural selection even appeared. youre a joke dude hahaha^^
Ilikenuman 1 year ago
@Tripockets
we didnt evolve from apes, WE ARE APES.
well done jackass, youve proven you know nothing.
Ilikenuman 1 year ago
@Ilikenuman your critique here is nonsense. The theory says we evolved from other animals but we are still classified as animals. In fact it says we evolved from chordates but we are still chordates. That we evolved from primates, but are still primates. Indeed it says we evolved from monkeys via other apes. So of course it says we evolved from apes; that we are still classified as apes makes no odds, just like we are still classified as animals doesn’t mean we didn’t evolve from animals.
allan3141 1 year ago
@Tripockets
no it isnt, our DNA sequence proves it.
creationism is bunk from beginning to end, theres no science behind it atall. Creation "scientists" like Hovind start with a conclusion, then try to find ways to make it plausable, yeah thats real scientific there aint it?
Ilikenuman 1 year ago
Man Kenneth Miller is awesome.
jtbovis 1 year ago
@Atheist603 sorry didn't finish a sentence there. "The fact that 40% of scientists are theistic" speaks to the fact that you can both be a scientist and believe in god.
artman2oo3 1 year ago
@artman2oo3
you can be a scientist and believe in all kinds of bat shit things, but when you start trying to pass it off as science are you even a scientist anymore?
Hexdoll 1 year ago 18
@Hexdoll Hmm. Are you aware of scientists trying to pass religion off as science? I would agree. But I don't think that any real scientists would do that. Dr. Miller certainly doesn't. In his testimony at the Dover trial he humorously said that the Red Sox's trip to the World Series in 2004 might have been divine intervention, but that wasn't science. I would say that any scientist trying to say religious stuff is scientific are those stupid "Creation scientists"
artman2oo3 1 year ago
@Hexdoll no
thejcjmguy 10 months ago
The best data is for ID? Huh? The data the is constantly being blown out of the water? ID, for the stupid, by the stupid.
professornuclearbomb 1 year ago
Religion is not incompatible with science per se, but it is incompatible when it's a religion based on faith (this in contrast with religions based on philosophical concepts).
Faith = not wanting to know what is true and accepting dogma instead. Science = trying to figure out what's true. Thus, both are incompatible.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 1 year ago
@OutOfTheBoxThinker Albert Einstein ~Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind. (1879-1955) interesting quote that goes along with post.
Faith is the substance of things hoped 4, but works best with trust ...the more u trust the more u can have faith. I put my faith in prevention and natural medicine because I don't trust those funding science, and education. I know 4 a fact there is a plot 4 1world gov with 1 currency, & 1 world religion through UN & the Vatican. :)
MajesticCyru 8 months ago
@MajesticCyru : Quoting Einstein? Well, two can play that game. A year before he died, Einstein wrote : "The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this."
IAnyway, ALL religions are forms of mind control. Religion is all about a self-proclaimed elite telling others what to do and think.
OutOfTheBoxThinker 8 months ago
@OutOfTheBoxThinker Oh I knew u would go there... but when & why did he change his mind?
"ALL religions are forms of mind control. Religion is all about a self-proclaimed elite telling others what to do and think."
Y & N 2 your point. This may b why Einstein changed his mind, but why I trust Jesus 4 railing against religion & 4 throwing out the money changers. He tore down the temple & rebuilt it in 3 days. He was & still is the greatest threat 2 these hypocritical or religious leaders.
MajesticCyru 8 months ago
~~~~~~~~~are eels dna changing~~
one of literally 100's of video clips that show 1000's of hours of evil demonic alien lifeforms pouring into the gulf through a rift. Atheism/Satanism are 100% accountable for putting all of humanity in imminent danger of extinction. Hell has been loosed upon humanity and yet ackmonra thinks he will not be held accountable for his Godforsaken lifestyle that doomed humanity. Atheist/Satanists are fully responsible for their attack on God, Country and Humanity.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
The Torah has a verifiable digital pattern proving the authors digital signiture. Simlar patterns in Holy Bible and Quran. Your scientific fact of no less the 20,000 humans any one time is grossly unsupportable. You are exactly what your first proved yourself to be, a filthy evil Satanic Nazi Shill.
First 2 books count 5+2 and circle
Last 2 books count 7-2 and circle
Middle book count 7 and circle
~Each Hebrew character circled totalling thousands spell Torah, Middle Book over & over~
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
100% of humanity entered this world as a child of God, after living a lifetime of choices that define what we grew to become, it rather obvious we are to exit the world as we entered it, only knowing how to love and be loved.
I can reduce my Gods enemies back to the infants they were when born and recognize their attacks are out of ignorance. On that level I can forgive, but not merely stand aside allowing them to assault their creator, The One God, The Father Almighty
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious
Actually every child born is an Atheist - as they have yet to be informed of the existance of any God. Children raised in India don't ever hear of Jesus, often because their parents have never heard of him either. Christianity is not by a long stretch the default for a human being.
By all means - enlighten me if you have compeling evidence for your God that can stand up to the kind of honest skepticism and detailed scientific investigation i am capable of.
ackmonra 1 year ago
@ackmonra
Read your own answer. Even given all the information to answer it correctly, you still are oblivious. Attaining Divine Wisdom. You can't even relate to the concept, even provided exactly what is required to achieve it. Divine Wisdom, Absolute Confirmation of God by His Holy Spirit. The evidence is absolute and exactly what Jesus Christ promised, stressing the urgency of why He must return to the Father. To ask He send the Holy Spirit in His name, to fulfill His promise. Such a pity
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
"By all means - enlighten me..."
- ackmonra
Gave you every every thing you need to achieve Divine Wisdom. If you can not grasp the concept from what I have provided, there is nothing I can do. your soul is in serious jeopardy and you fail to recognize that, not wise. not wise at all.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious
I can assure you that nothing you have provided to me is in the least bit compelling.
And that isn't my fault.
It seems your standard of evidence is far below mine.
ackmonra 1 year ago
@ackmonra
Reading through this post log your ego must have an insatiable appetite that drives you to publicly display your ignorance. Olivious to what constitutes Divine Wisdom inspite of writing an epistle of ignorance attempting to answer the defining question. Plato wrote a brilliant definition and you failed to comprehend why Wisdom was capitalized. You have no standard beyond oblivious and you achieve that standard long before you complete a thought.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@ackmonra
Prove God doesn't exist to support your insanity having breached your fundamental commitment to the truth which resulted in the fatal logic error revealing you to be a fundamental liar and fraud. I'm not the one who made an arbitrary & subjective decision to dismiss God as a possibility, you are. What scientific fact you use to support your choosing to dismiss God? You have none. You did it based on arbitrary and subjective reasoning, yet claim scientific. You are a fraud.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious
Its easy - the bible states that God created the first 2 Human being.
Through genetic evidence we know there were never fewer than 20,000 human beings at any one time.
Therefore; the God of the bible dosn't exist as described in the bible.
I'm open to some god existing - and for you to prove that he/she/it does. But i've already eliminated the God of the bible for more reasons than i can fit in 400 characters.
ackmonra 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ackmonra
Torah, the book you attempt to diminish has a digital pattern proving the authors digital signiture and simlar patterns are found, Holy Bible and Quran. Your scientific fact of no less the 20,000 humans anyone time is an unsupportable lie. you are a filthy Satanic Nazi Shill.
First 2 books count 5+2 and circle
Last 2 books count 7-2 and circle
Middle book count 7 and circle
Each Hebrew character circled totalling thousands will spell TORAH, the Middle Book over & over
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@ackmonra <---- Satanic Nazi Shill and filthy pathetic liar
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious
Wrong on all counts - lying makes Jesus cry you know.
ackmonra 1 year ago
@ackmonra
stealing children to mutilate in your Satanic Rituals is murder you know and your Godforsaken doctrine feeds that pipeline. Nice homepage friends list swimming in Satanic symbolism. If you can get people to believe collect teddy bears and the stack of tricycles in the back yard is an art sculpture won't even have to wipe the kids blood off the walls.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious
My word; what a horrible mind you have.
You've just conjured all of that out of your own darkness and for your own pleasure.
You enjoy thinking everyone who disagrees with you are horrible monsters - dispite the fact they're not.
Its a disgusting habit i've seen only only a handful of religious people here on Youtube.
ackmonra 1 year ago
@ackmonra
You don't like the truth because it does shed a light on who and what you are. I call it like I see it and you have said nothing that doesn't prove exactly what I have stated. Don't like the visual imagery of what your responsible for? Neither do I and allowing you to slither around promoting it without having to recognize responsibility is all too convenient. You promote an attack on God, Country & Humanity 24/7. I stood for what you attack my entire life so have the majority.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ackmonra
What is your twisted excuse for a friends list swimming in Satanic symbolism? A picture is worth a 1000 words and speaks volumes about exactly who and what you are. An evil filthy Satanic Nazi Shill who has the hypocricy to blaspheme God and religion while blatantly worshipping Satan.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@ackmonra
half assed Satanic excuse to promote a doctrine of a genocidal maniac and a direct assault against God, US Constitution and humanity. Claiming to have intelligence and then twisting a completely unsupportable lie as genetic evidence that supports your decision to arbitrarily dismiss god and lie. No surprise though, your a Satanic/Atheist and your all fundamental liars. What a Satanic Nazi Clown
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious
Someone's got the diaper rash. Are you a poe?
SCRulerShinoda 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Torah has a verifiable digital pattern proving the authors digital signiture. Simlar patterns in Holy Bible and Quran. Written thousands of years ago with a pattern so complex can not be duplicated by a modern author with a wordprocessing program and a computer.
First 2 books count 5+2 and circle
Last 2 books count 7-2 and circle
Middle book count 7 and circle
Each Hebrew character circled totalling thousands spell Torah, Middle Book over & over
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
Plato defined Wisdom, as "a condition of the soul" that has an affinity with that which it is familiar, becoming drunk when in it's presence. Plato capitalized Wisdom to be subtely recognized. In the contest of Plato's brilliant definition consider the following. "Would a wise man question the Wisdom of God?"
Responses range from a *Divine simple No, to oblivious epistile's of ignorance.
Divine *Wisdom = Recv'd Holy Spirit /Confirmation of God = His Gift, Jesus Christ Promise to all
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious
The answer is "yes" a wise man would question God - he'd want to know the reasons for God's ways because then he too would be as wise as God.
If it turns out in the questioning of God's apponted spokesmen the wise man realises the God is false or a hoax; so be it.
He remains wise.
ackmonra 1 year ago
@ackmonra
No he proves himself not to be wise at all because he does not possess Divine Wisdom. Divine Wisdom is denoted by being capitalized. To be truly wise one must attain Divine Wisdom. Plato could not have written his definition without it and you would still be filling out a blue book while those with Divine Wisdom received an A and you awarded a failing grade several minutes later for your epistile of ignorance.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The demonic evil alien lifeforms pouring into the gulf are 100% the responsibility of Godforsaken Atheists/Satanists/Evolutionists. Those Nazis doomed humanity and first need to answer to humanity then God.
-----are eels dna changing~~~~
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
~~are eels dna changing~~
Evil demonic alien lifeforms pouring into gulf. Atheists/Satanists/Evolutionists couldn't disprove God so they opted to prove Satan.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious
Wake; its crude oil polluting the gulf - not any form of living matter.
And for your information its quite easy to disprove all of humanity's current Gods because their discriptions are inconsistant; conflicting and all the evidence we have disproves all claims about them.
That isn't to difficult to understand. I'll even demonstrate for you if you tell me exactly which version of Judaism/Christianity/Islam you follow.
ackmonra 1 year ago
@ackmonra <---------Insane Evil Satanic Nazi. Ya right 1000's of hours of video footage and can even watch realtime and all those scientists are lying. you are an evil Satanic Nazi and pathetic
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious
I'm sane enough to form coherent sentances, which is more that can be said for yourself so far.
I'm not entirely evil.
I don't believe Satan exists.
And i'm not a member of any Nazi party past or present.
What footage are you talking about?
Why would scientists lie? Scientists who lie couldn't discover or invent anything.
So what are you doing? Does lying and being incomprehensible give you some kind of pleasure? Using lies and confusion is supposed to be the devil's way.
ackmonra 1 year ago
@ackmonra <---Atheist/Satanic Nazi Shill and 100% responsible
~~are eels dna changing~~ one of literally 100's of video clips that show 1000's of hours of evil demonic alien lifeforms pouring into the gulf
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious
Tell me wake - are you interested in listening to anything that i have to say? You seem to be quite happy simultaniously ignoring me and calling me names like a child on a playground.
If you don't want a discussion i'll leave you to your ways.
I'm so very sorry for what has been done to you.
ackmonra 1 year ago
@ackmonra
You plan on continuing to promote the Satanic Agenda in light of the truth, by ignoring it? Or, you going to take responsibility for your actions and do the right thing? I can offer you my forgiveness, but you need more then mine. I'm not final judge, He is and lucky for you He is an extremely warm, Wise and loving God. Good luck and be sincere.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@ackmonra
From what I gathered Miracles don't have an order of magnitude. A miracle is a miracle.Transgressions, however do have and once the action is recognized by the person to be a sin against God yet they continue to do so then the magnitude of the transgression grow. How much, that is not clear, but indication is it is logrithmic. Big time, huge. To continue your attacks against God, knowing He exists is a Major sin against God. Be wise, your soul is in jeopardy.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious
Atheists by definition don't know a God exists.
I in all honesty don't believe - i don't deny because i see nothing to deny.
That is what an atheist is - and we exist by the millions.
Its strange to me that you can believe in a God for which there is no compelling evidence yet deny the existance of an entire kind of people because they don't fit into your world view.
Atheists are honestly skeptical - no devilry or denial.
ackmonra 1 year ago
Game over, if eliminate God through Satanism/Atheism so goes all men were created equal and Liberty and Justice for All. Result the one that warned of the other was the truth and humanity bought an Evil Illusion the product of Godforsaken Atheists/Satanists who are an enemy of God & a threat to US Constitution and Humanity. Satanists obliterated the scientific standard of irrefutable evidence with a Hoax.Led to Demonic Torture at Abhu Gharib & ritualistic mutilation stolen children by Satanists
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious
I am an atheist and i had Creator, two infact - my parents; and they had their creators; their parents.
Also - Atheists don't "forsake" God - they've either never met/heard of a specific God, or they just see no compelling evidence and are therefore honestly unable to believe.
It sounds to me like you've swallowed a lot of propoganda with regard to people who arn't of the same religious view as yourself.
ackmonra 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ackmonra <-----Will be held accountable by humanity and God for crime against humanity ~~~~~~~~~~~are eels dna changing~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Evil demonic alien lifeforms pouring into gulf. Atheists/Satanists/Evolutionists couldn't disprove God so they opted to prove Satan. Hold them 100% accountable.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@ackmonra
The demonic evil alien lifeforms pouring into the gulf are 100% the responsibility of Godforsaken Atheists/Satanists/Evolutionists. Those Nazis doomed humanity and first need to answer to humanity then God.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious
Wake - you used a lot of words there which i indiviudally understand; but put them in that order and they don't make sense.
You mentioned the Gulf Oil spill? What has that got to do with this - and please be clear.
ackmonra 1 year ago
Basic 101 fundamental logic & simple. A commitment to the truth (the only sane choice) inherently expands to include all possibilities. Arbitrary dismissal of a possibility breaches that commitment as a fatal logic error proving the person fundamentally a liar & a fraud. When an Atheist dismisses the possibility of God, they breached their commitment to the truth, resulting in the mindfucked insanity to argue justifying a lie, is rational behavior.
Atheist = Satanist = Evil Liars
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious
Atheist = Satanist = Evil Liars
This isn't correct.
No atheists are Satanists - because to be a Satanist you have to accept biblical christianity and just "side for the other guy" instead of God.
Some Atheists are Evil Liars - but very few; after all Atheist meaning only "without gods" includes all babies who've yet to pick a religion.
It also includes a vast majority of honest scientists; who just - see no evidence for any Gods.
ackmonra 1 year ago
@questionsamson I agree, I'm an Atheist and as far as I'm concerned he's everything a Christian should be. When he talks to someone, or responds to a question, he actually uses real words instead of some 20 minute babble about the great powers of the lord and some completely unrelated or out of context bible quote or many times debunked "evidence". The video of him talking about Dawkins is awesome, respectful, and an excellent example of what Science should be. He is a badass educator too.
anthonyhiscox 1 year ago
"I read a book that says God did everything and my mommy and daddy say its right."
"I have hundreds of years of meticulous data collecting that say you're wrong"
"Well think your science and your facts are wrong if they say I'm wrong"
"Data isn't wrong just because you don't like it"
"Yeah huh it is, mommy and daddy said so"
"Then they're wrong to"-BANG!
" Well I have a gun and I say that your dead, no more lies from you science boy."
Lets pass some MORE laws to make this scenario acceptable.
OnewhoWonders1 1 year ago
On the more general philisophical question; yes; unless you're really good at compartmentalizing religion from the rational part of you're mind.
Walabinx 1 year ago
Ah, I love how stupid conservatives in this country say that they "believe" in freedom, equality, and democracy, but before you know it they are attempting to shove religion down our throats. Is there ANY scientific evidence for intelligent design? ANY?! No, there is not. Therefor, god doesn't exist, and evolution and the big bang, because of there PHYSICAL SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, are real. And people can't use the bible as proof of I.D.. that's called "argument from faith", and it's pretty shity
swiftmachine1515 1 year ago
good video. of course science and religion are not incompatible. but if your view of religion is very literal (i.e. form religious texts) then there is some incompatibility. i await the day we are all able to free ourselves of the confines of religiosity.
JesusFuck 1 year ago
I'd more compare intelligent design to affirmative action than welfare because rather than go through the peer reveiw process that every other scientist has had to go through these creationists just wanna skip the whole thing and get their junk science right into the textbooks which is unfair to all the real scientists who've done all the hard work to just move creationists to bypass the system like that.
SockbatReplica 1 year ago
Yes they are incompatible. The idea of faith is flawed. It is the opposite of science. Faith is believing without evidence. Science is believing because of evidence. These two ideas are incompatible for a sane person and a healthy society.
MrBossnagger 1 year ago 12
@MrBossnagger No. You're confusing incompatibility w/territory assignment. Religion shouldn't try to answer scientific questions and science shouldn't try to answer religious questions. Miller wrote a great book, "Finding Darwin's God" where he explains the common ground. Science describes how the natural world works. Faith comes in on philosophical/spiritual questions. This is the same thing Creationists (Discovery Institute) try to do, drive a wedge between science and religion.
artman2oo3 1 year ago
@artman2oo3 actually i'd say the difference between science and religion is one is about the real world and the other one is about fantasy land.
Atheist603 1 year ago
@Atheist603 The issue is that science will not comment one way or the other if religion is a fantasy or not. I personally don't see anything wrong with accepting all scientific discoveries and then just saying "That's how God did it." The fact that 40% of scientists are theistic. Granted that's a lower percentage than the general population but that is a testament to the two being compatible. Since most people believe in a God of some sort it's important for common ground.
artman2oo3 1 year ago
@artman2oo3 well that's 40% of scientist in the US, not worldwide. Europe is much less than that. and if you look at the highest ranking scientist it's actually 93% don't believe in god or personal god etc.. i personally think the reason why most pplz believe in gods is bcuz of fear, they wanna believe that there's someone out there lookin out 4 them. I mean to think about it nature is scary, i mean to see how many species have gone extinct, reality is hard, that why pplz make up god to cry to
Atheist603 1 year ago
@artman2oo3 philosophical and spiritual questions are worthless though, other than placebo. They don't help in terms of advancing us.
SCRulerShinoda 1 year ago
@SCRulerShinoda Not necessarily. Sure, it can. The Creationist movement today, burning people at the stake centuries ago for saying the Earth isn't the center of the universe, yes religion often impedes science. However, sometimes a reverence for the beauty of God's creation can inspire somebody to have the desire to figure out how it works and that is what has motivated some scientists.
artman2oo3 1 year ago
@artman2oo3 This is true. However when I do see a desire to search, sometimes they allow their faith to impede their work.
SCRulerShinoda 1 year ago
@MrBossnagger
You have little humanity, faith isn't a scientific test you must undergo in order to decide what you know as the truth, it is a personal journey into the depths of our existence beyond what the physical world can tell us. It is the pinnacle of the human experience. I know my God to be real, i cannot say that for you, but for me i see his reality on a different level than the physical world. Saying there is no god is narcissistic, as you limit existence to your own physical world.
BrazilianPride22041 1 year ago
@MrBossnagger
*facepalm*
I am a christian, I am also a biochemist heading to medical school. Stereotypes are the mark of true stupidity
aggiefitz 1 year ago
@MrBossnagger scientists believe that consciousness arises from an arrangement of matter. They believe this without evidence. So is that not faith too and not science?
allan3141 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@allan3141 " scientists believe that consciousness arises from an arrangement of matter. They believe this without evidence. So is that not faith too and not science?" No. Scientists believe this with the benefit of evidence. Neurochemical tests, experimental data, neuroelectrical experimentation and testable predictions. Where did you get the idea that it was without evidence?
alianchild 1 year ago
Science is clearly incompatible with faith based beliefs, by its definition faith is incompatible with science.
captain3xtreme 1 year ago
Many things defy Man's rationale as his intellect simply isn't big enough. The answer from corporate religious fanatics, of the 21st century, to all things mysterious & contrary is: EVOLUTION. To Darwin's caretakers: It's incumbent upon the person making any claim to bring forth evidence.
TransliteratedJumble 1 year ago
I like Bobby Jindal, but he sounds like a moron here. It's unfortunate that Repubs throw their weight behind those idiots at the discovery institute.
brmadman4455 1 year ago
Kenneth Miller said
''I believe in a designer, but not a deceptive one''.
Great man. Great Scientist.
Primordialfan1 1 year ago 15
@Primordialfan1 is this as consistent as you seem to imply? I mean; he believes in a Designer, but believes there is no evidence of design, but still further believes that Designer is not deceptive. That surely is not a position that is self-evidently consistent. Why does he believe in a Designer any way, does he just do it willy nilly and without any evidence or rational grounds?
allan3141 1 year ago
LiberalViewer, you're great man. Nice video/good study break. Thanks man!
aplee2006 1 year ago
Even Jesus himself backed the idea of the separation of church and state when he said: Give unto Caesar what is Caesar's and God what is God's.
It's a shame that Christians constantly misrepresents their own supposed 'Lord and Savior'. They allow dogma and their own sense of superiority to destroy Jesus' message about peace, love and forgiveness and instead spread ignorance, intolerance and even hatred. I don't think Jesus would approve in the least.
Backfromthedeadguy 1 year ago
@investur Has he ever offered evidence that there is a God, or at least, something that cannot be explained?
I think it tells you that anyone can believe in God. But he may very well save the US billions, which should be applauded.
Doomsage680 1 year ago
@Faustuss1 You are right. This was a year ago and yet I am surprised by my acceptance of those skeletons that have been shown to be hoaxes.
Lol. Peace.
Doomsage680 1 year ago
@Doomsage680 Disclaimer- I have since become a hardcore atheist and certainly a Darwinist.
These skeletons have been shown to be massively successful hoaxes. My apologies for misleading anybody.
Doomsage680 1 year ago