The dust of subatomic particles resulted after the collisions in LHC are particles of ethereal matter, even that the physicists give not them permission of existence! The electrical discharge to one Tesla coil was made and in a basin with water. Great was the surprise that the electrical discharge of the particles of electrical ether in water has the same ARBORESCENT SHAPE - proving the existence, and in water of the primary ethereal gravitational field.
From 1967 I analyse with attention all published experiments concerning the accelerators of particles and the controlled thermonuclear fusion, moreover and the scriptural and paleoastronautical information. I had made only a logical and rational synthesis of the applied science, therefore my brothers- you block not the your sites and my computer. Please you to support me, how long, I still can produce such information.
Now, were collided particles in LHC and you seen that is nothimg: none Higgs boson, none Big-Bang, neither black holes, but only thousands of shards of ethereal particles.Therefore, now -return you physicists from your distraction at Isaac Newton with his universal attraction law= THE UNIFIED LAW OF THE MATTERS AND FORCES, at the eliminated ETHER by Einstein, at the unseen world of the ethereal and spiritual matters which fill up the Cosmos, and return you at the Lord- at God!
The physicists show that about the discovery the Higgs boson it desire and the discovery the origins of the bodies'mass; the discovery the dark matter, the discovery the superior dimensions and the demonstration of the superposition. But as a result to the collisions of particles- the black holes had appeared not, the Big-Bang had appeared not demonstrating that the Large Hadron Collider bring not about us the Apocalipse.
It say: with the exception of the Higgs boson all the predicted particles of Standard Model were detected and the them properties were measured with precision. The Standard Model of particles to arrived let be verified, but, if the Higgs boson is not finded, then the Standard Model and the others models will be necessary to be reconstruct from zero.
In 1964 physicist Peter Higgs has thinked existence to one energetic field which penetrate whole Universe, and named it "Higgs field" and his particles named "Higgs boson"and that these can give mass the subatomic particles.Thus appear the necessity as in the CERN-frame let it construct an accelerator more big: the LARGE HADRON COLLIDER,which made the first collisions of particles in 14 December 2009, afterwards in 2010, in 2011 and they uncovered not the Higgs boson particles
The movement of the celestial bodies in Cosmos demonstrates that these it can not maintain in the existent formation if not would exist and another matter which let complete and fill up the Cosmos. And this unknown matter, which is the eliminated ETHER- they named she: dark matter and dark energy, which is in proportion of 96% from the Cosmos's mass.
Already the protons, neutrons and electrons are formed through condensation and concentration of the etehreal particles. But how the ETHER has eliminated from physics, the physicists had invented the Standard Model of the particles and them forces excluding the gravity. Thus for to comprise and the gravity with her particles and forces they had invented and the strings theory.
The materials seem to be complicated and irregular at the sight with the free eye. But at microscope they it show simple and orderly. All the material shapes: animal. vegetal and mineral are made from atoms and these only from three constituents: protons, neutrons and electrons. The photon of light we see it and the photon of heat we feel it, but the ethereal particles are more small, of a few thousands time; we see not them now, but the our spirits see them.
Between 1930...1935 the discord was photon of light.The opinion of physicists had not adopted existence in flight to photon, and photon remain without mass. If photon has not mass, he cannot interact with nothing on trajectory and the light speed remain constant lengthways the trajectory. Thus, in place let to consider that the photons lose themselves the speed on way as result the them interaction with the intergalactic matter, they had set the Unuverse let it dilate entirely
Today in front of our eyes and of the observation apparatuses it succedes all evolution phases of the celestial bodies, stars and galaxies. An evidence that the Universe doesn't seems to have an explosive beginning and doesn't seems to have ever an end in the his entirely. The facts demonstrates that in Universe the cyclical creation has place continuously in certain parts, and can has not place total creation in the same time in all the mass of the Universe.
As early as the time of Michael Faraday at scientific problems in contradiction, academical circles decided victory the some or another.In this optics of domination of certain conceptions: philosophical, theological and of other principles, in science had penetrated mistaken and fallacious theories, and the impossibility of immediate verification, to leaded at the creation others abstractings which had blocked the road of the scientific innovation with practical applications.
Today, on measure that the theory advances from classic mechanics to the quantum mechanics the particle and the wave are gradual dematerialize. The modern physics is blocked by enunciation of some laws and mistaken principles as: relativity theory, Hubble's law, postulation that the atom can't emit and absorb radiations continously, admitting the postulate what claims the photons without mass a.s.o. These guide- us at supernatural and at the technical and technological blocage
Nikola Tesla argued that:" I hold that the space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can has not properties. Of properties it can speak only when it work with the matter which fill up the space. The empty space it can not curve because- something- can not action about -nothing". This relativity proceed from a philosophical direction, on which A.Einstein produce her when he was found in a state of technical and religious confusion.
Einstein ignore and vex over 100 of men of science which had signed a petition in which they upholded that the his relativity theory is wrongly. It renounce at the absolute space and absolute time, it arrive at the Lorentz-Einstein's transformations through the introduction to two factors- subunitary and superunitary what lead at the infinte mass phantoms, at the infinte energy phantoms and at the infinte impuls phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed.
As a result of the wrong interpretation of the Michelsom-Morley(1881)'s experiments which had demonstrated that the ETHER is entirely trained with the mass and the Earth's atmosphere, in 1905 A.Einstein renounced at the ether notion, at absolute space and set the relativist mecanics' base. He emits the two restricted relativity principles through which excludes the Ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement -the light speed and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality
Thus, the primary gravitational field it manifest as a solid body for the electrical ether and the electromagnetic phenomenons, and in the same time it manifest as a fluid body for the ethereal concentrated bodies and for the chemical bodies. We perceive the secondary gravitational field among the astral bodies. and in the electrical unloading's case which are ARBORESCENT we perceive and the primary gravitational field of the primary electrogenic particles.
But celestial sources say us that whole Cosmos is filled with a dense powder of alive ethereal and electrogenic particles, and among they are streams of particles and more small because gravitational primary attraction among they, constituting primary gravitational field.But more exist,in the same space and secundary gravitational field produced by the ethereal concentrated particles in the ethereal bodies and in the chemical bodies which are neutral from electrical viewpoint.
With much before Einstein, J.C.Maxwell starts from a mental experience, says that he generalize the Faraday's Electric Induction law and exclaims that the transmited wave would be a successive creation of magnetic fields and electric fields perpendicular between them and on the propagation direction. Since then it preachs the transmission of the electromagnetic wave at thousands kilometres without material suport.
Leibnitz(1646...1716) German scientist, forerunner of the mathematical logic, through the denial the newtonian space- time is and he a forerunner of the Einstein's relativity. Einstein considers the gravity as a property of the space and not in the least as a property of the matter which fill up this space. The Einstein's relativity is a geometrization of the space.
In the century XIX, the new scholars: Coulomb, Laplace, Ampere, Poisson, Green, Gauss, Webwer etc., had holded the action's theory at distance without material support, and they support only the mathematical abstracted theories. The science already started let it cover more much with the theory than with the practice.
The theory without logic and reason is and remain an non-reality.The science is at beginning a theory, but has logic and reason and become true after the her practical realisation.The space it stretch in Infinite and the time come from Infinite and it stretch in Infinite marking the reality of the ours material world seen and unseen.The faithless man believe not that exist the God with the our world seen and unseen and then this man can not think and judge with real elements.
A.Einstein through the his relativity to REVERSED the reality of the our terresterial world. He remove the ETHER from physics and give materiality the space and the time. But the SPACE limit the place where it can unfolding material actions and the TIME mark the period of unfolding to some material actions. The space and the time are only ABSTRACT notions, absolute and colateral which show where and when it unfolding certain material actions.
The theorist physicist omit to study the science's history as let understand the things and phenomenons, but they learn only the exposed theory for to obtain a diploma, afterwards they twitter. We must let understand the science and how it was builded. Einstein has and good parts, but those mistaken are catastrophic. But Einstein was not single in the supporting the mistakes.
The theoretical mistakes from centuries XIX and XX, had been amplified and had passed noisily in century XXI. Many experiments and terrestrial and extraterrestrial observations was wrongly interpreted because theoretical physics indoctrinated with Einstein's relativity.Thus was started the investigation of subatomic particles without ethereal matters and was started the building of the ITER without to know the electrical ether and his role in the working of the magnetic trap
If in 1905 Einstein excludes the ETHER from physics, viz excludes the intergalactic matter, then the his disciples arrive with the relativity theory at Big-Bang, at black holes, holes of worm, at singularity and today at travel in time. Thus the great explosion of George Gamov and his fellows R.A.Ipher and R.C.Hermann, become cosmological standardized theory which is one great bluff!
And yet, we can see, we can visualize the ethereal matter. The scheme to one device for to visualize the ethereal matter: EXIST! And this device it can realize!
The matter of the our terrestrial globe has four states of aggregation: solid, liquid, gseous and ethereal and not three after official science. The matter on which we see it, proceed from the ethereal matter, which from cancentration in concentration it had constituted in the electrons, in protons respectivel;y in the atoms of the chemical elements which had overtaken at the gaseous, liquid and solid state. All the matter on which we see it, is condensed ether.
The GRAVITY’s PARTICLES as aproximately the smallest ethereal particles, constitute the most general ethereal aggregation state from nature, with the largest temperature interval, from zero Kelvin degrees to millions of degrees in stars.That is an aggregation state which coexist with all others aggregation states(solid, liquid, gaseous, ethereal) and on which it influenced them. The actual official science is mistaken in great proportion because this has not in sight the Ether
The ACTUAL ELECTRICAL GENERATORS : galvanic elements and electrical accumulators; dynamos and alternators; thermoelements and photoelectric cell - transform nothing, but they only gather the electrical energy= the particles of the electrical ether which exist in metals, in the environing medium, in the thermic radiation or in the ray of light!
The ELECTRICAL CURRENT consist in circulation in the round and in lengthways to one electrical conductor to the particles of electrical ether guided on the magnetic field from the round the conductor; magnetic field formed all from particles of electrical ether coupled head at head and expelled in concentric circles in the round the conductor.If it interrupt the electrical current, then it decompose and this magnetic field in particles of electrical ether and it drain in circuit
The ELECTRON is not an exclusive electrical load, but an elementary particle from the composition of any atom, and is only a particle with intermediate role in the unfolding of the electrical phenomenons. The REAL ELECTRCAL LOAD is a particle of electrical ether more nore small than the electron, has and she a personal and rapid rotation, producing a personal magnetic field, which it gear with the magnetic field from the round of one electrical conductor.
The PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL MATTER is the visible matter with free eye and is constituted from atoms of the chemical elements. The PHYSICAL-ETHEREAL MATTER is a matter with atoms more small with 7..8 order of dimension than the atoms of chemical elements, and the bodies formed from this matter are invisible for the human eye. The ETHEREAL PHYSICS it occupy with the study of the ethereal matters, but which was abandoned in the XX century, because in 1905 A.Einstein excludes the ether
• SandustanBrasov But the ETHER is a physical reality constituted from a very small matter, invisible for human eye, and is formed from atoms more small with 7...8 order of dimension than the atoms of the chemical elements. The matter of the ether penetrate in all the visible bodies and is the physical matter which fills both the interplanetary space and the interatomic space. The ether is a matter with mass and weigth, being subdued and she the action of the universal attraction law.
After Mendeleev's opinion is possible and necessary the extension of periodical system for other size's order - more small- of the ethereal matter particles. About the absolute vacuum space, M.Faraday had the certitude that it doesn't exist, and it exists only an incomplte vacuum whose spatial magnetic state is of the most importance for the natures phenomenons.
D.I.Mendeleev had shown through 1860:"Studying the ether which penetrate in all the bodies and asking myself the question: from what is formed this ether's mass, I had admitted the idea that theirs atoms, or his matter represent the primary matter, from which are formed all atoms. The existence to the one light mass, to the one light substance and less of chemical forces, is possibly but, is even necessary".
SandustanBrasov If in 1905 Einstein excludes the ether from physics, viz excludes the intergalactic matter, then the his fanatical disciples, the his theoretical parrots, arrive with the rlativity theory at Big bang, at black holes, holes of worm, at singularity and today at the travel in time. Thus, the great explosion of George Gamov and his follows R.A.Ipfer and R.C.Hermann become cosmological standardized theory, but which is one great bluff!
In 1930..1935 apple of discord was the photon of light. General opinion of the physicists had adopted the viewpoint which upholded not the existence's idea in flight to photon. Thus they had allowed the photon without mass.If the photon has not mass, he can't interact with nothing on trajectory and the light speed remain constant.In place let to consider that the photons lose the speed on way following them interaction with the meeted matter, they had set the Universe let dilate
Today, on measure that the theory advances from classic mechanics to the quantum mechanics the particle and wave are gradual dematerialize.The modern physics is blocked by enounciation of some laws and mistaken principles as: relativity theory;Hubble's low, poastulation that the atom can't emit and absorb radiations continuously, admitting the postulate what claims the photons without mass a.s.o.These guide us at supernatural, and at the technical and technological blockage.
Nikola Tesla argued that:"I hold that the space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can has not properties. Of properties it can speak only when it work with the matter which fill up the space. The empty space it can not curve because - something - can not action about - nothing". This relativity proceed from a philosophical direction, on which A.Einstein produce her when he was found in a state of technical and religious confusion.
Einstein considers the gravity as a property of the space and not in the least as a property of the matter which fill up this space. The relativity theory of the Einstein is a geometrization of the space. Leibnitz(1646...1716) German scientist, forerunner of the mathematical logic, through the denial the newtonian space-time is and he a forerunner of the Einstein's relativity.
• Were introduced in physics the infinite mass phantoms, the infinite energy phantoms and the infinite impulse phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed in vacuum. Today we know that many particles were accelerate unill at the light speed, others had arrived with this speed from cosmos, but at none grow up not at infinite or near of infinite the mass, the energy or the impulse.
It renounce thus at the absolute space and at the absolute time. From the simple and linear transformations of the Galilei's relativity it arrive at the Lorentz- Einstein's transformations through the introduction to two factors, subunitary and superunitary. Thus, with these confusions about space and time it passed at the adequate changes about the whole physics.
Actually Einstein, from theoretical confusion and of megalomania, establish that none object with mass can not outrun the light speed.He succeeding, how written publications of the time, let vex much people, then, whenever over a hundred of people of science had signed a petition in which they upholded that the relativity theory is mistaken, is fallacious.Einstein upholded his relativity theory, believing in the fact that then, nobody can not to demonstrate him the contrary.
The science has and history. In the Fundamental Principle of Democrit(470..380BC) it show:"From nothing nothing's born, nothing that exist can not be destroyed and any transformation consist from a reunion and separation...Out of atoms and ether. all rest is not otherwise than rationament and not exist...The spirit as well as the ether consist of a small and spherical atoms, very mobile, atoms that their movement form the phenomenon of life".
Through the relativity theory to Einstein of over century, it hold with strenght -as a conspiracy a general activity of intellectual stultify of the planetary population. from relativity theory proceed the notion of: singularity, Big bang, black holes and holes of worm. From 1905 and till now in 2011, the disciples of the Einstein, preach with contumely as scientific elements of high class these theoretical confusions, these absurdities from which they had made a business.
The notion of dark matter and dark energy proceed from theoretical physics, from relativity theory of the A. Einstein, from the mistaken interpretation of the physical reality. Something exist indeed: and matter and energy; but is the much ethereal matter and the her energys from the her frame. Dark energy and cosmic acceleration are a failure of relativity of the Einstein.
• SandustanBrasov In 1905, A.Einstein conclude that the ether hasn't a correspondent in reality and constitute not a medium which let can serve as reference system. Thus Einstein renounced to the ether notion and absolute space and emits the two restricted relativity principles. By it content the second principle excludes the ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement - the light speed - and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality.
Ok, I have to ask this. Is our lil bitty planet the BEST place to conduct experiments like this? Here's my reason for asking this. We're trying to find out what happened in the first few moments of the universes life. We kinda have an idea of what went down but we really don't know. Who's to say that that there wasn't strange or different types of matter that initially happened in the big bang that disappeared a long time ago wouldn't make our current matter unstable?
Phil Owen here, the guy who made the video. Thanks for the upload, added music and all the great comments! Sorry for my terrible narration, makes me cringe as well, was a rushed job with a few days of no sleep, ;{ Makes me really respect pro narrators after this.
"The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation, no matter how subtle, can (for me) change this." - In a letter to Gutkind.
"The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation, no matter how subtle, can (for me) change this." -Einstein wrote to Gutkind
To all Christians, Gravity is a theory too, trust me- I am a faithful fellow christian that believes in our beloved father in heaven and our holy book that clearly states the world is 6k years old, if you jump from buildings you can actually fly because gravity is only an idea the satanic scientists have implanted in your brains, free yourselves and believe in lord and savior Jebus then commit massive sui- I mean fly and become one with the sky trol- I mean our beloved trinity monotheistic god.
Bible doesn't state the world is 6k old. A careful study of the Bibical timeline reaches back to 11,013 B.C. which would be 13,022 years old.
Gravity actually is a theory, currently another theory challenges the whole concept of gravity, that there could possibly be several forces at work instead of idea of gravity, which is speculated as a result of mass. You call it gravity but its really a unknown force or forces, gravity is only really a educated guess not a fact.
Your kidding right. Gravity is true whether you like it or not.
There is absolutely nothing, nothing that contradicts gravity. We can simulate zero gravity for a reason. It doesn't matter what you name it. Gravity is gravity, as we know it and it will always be there, we just don't understand it on a molecular, or quantum basis.
A theory is not an educated guess. Theories are considered higher than facts in the science realm, because theories unite facts.
You don't understand the fact that "gravity" is a word used to describe a perticular theory. Of coarse we know there is a force(s) at work, that is not in question and yes it does matter what you name it because of the descriptions implied. We don't call the sun a moon or a waterfall a lake for a reason.
Lol. Sorry guy but theories are in no way facts, altho many may in fact be true they are not proven facts thats why they are called theories in the first place.
Gravity can simply be expanded on. It's presence, although, is unmistakable and undeniable.
It doesn't matter whether it is 6500 years old or 10000+ years old.
There is a reason why we can see the furthest galaxy from us, which is 13.23 billion light years. Meaning the light took 13 billion years to reach us. The fact of the matter is that they are both wrong. If everything were created within 7 days, that would imply that everything should only be date several days from each other,
"Meaning the light took 13 billion years to reach us. "
No, it means it would take 13 billion years to reach us, doesn't mean it did in fact take 13 billion years. That light would have been here at those stars creation and therefore would not have had to initially travel. God said, " Let there be light" not, ok now Im going to wait 13 billion years for that light I created to get here.
Bibical creation happened in 6 days not 7 and yes everything was created within days.
... The scientific method clearly states that the Earth is 4.5 billion years old. If it were 10000 years old it would show, 10000, not 4.5 billion.
And please don't invoke the gap theory, or non-literal meaning of 7 days. If you can't take your God literally, then what kind of God is that? A God who purposefully choses to deceive us.
The scientific method states no such thing that the Earth is 4.5 billion years old, thats complete nonsense. Thats what the evilutionists want to believe but science does not give any credance to that idea. There is much more evidence for a young Earth of only thousands of years than that of one which is billions or even millions.
Gap theory is not correct, the Bible clearly states literal 24 hour periods in reference to the days of creation. Of coarse I take God literally.
@Uaz31 So, radioactive decay means nothing to Creationists and of course, since creationists are all scientists and because Einstein was a creationist too it means that science doesn't believe in radioactive decay, right? And just for your info, don't take me literally, Einstein was an atheist just didn't bother himself with theists. Also, creationists aren't real scientists, and never will be. Radioactive decay IS science and Science uses it for various reasons. One is counting the earth's age.
What about radioactive decay? If your referring to radiometric dating that cannot possibly be accounted accurate past known history which would be 3,000 B.C. as its all assumption then, they assume the rates have remained constant, thats not fact thats fiction.
Einstein was not in any way an atheist. He believed in a non-personnal God, the only reason he rejected the christian faith was that he didnt want to acknowledge a God who would allow so much suffering.
@Uaz31 I can keep walking all over you, the point is, what you can give me are links from random untrusted creationists sources and I can just through back a quote from a world renown scientist and shatter your argument with realistic facts. You can live all you want in your little fantasy world with a promise of the afterlife while I enjoy my current life to it's fullest without having to worship anyone, and look for the real answers without having to blame it on an imaginary sky troll.
world renown doesn't mean they are right. God resists the proud pious fools didnt u know? Even Einstein as bright as he was, he was also a childish fool to think that there could be such think as a non personal God, it defies the very concept of God and he was a "genious".
Fantasy world?! lol. Nah my outlook it based on facts, science is nothing more than the exploration of God's creation. Evilutionary ideaology isn't, feathers to scales lol, thats the real fantasy.
@Uaz31 Of course it doesn't mean they are right, it just so happens that they are the reason we have cars instead of horses and telephones instead of sending birds around. Lets not mention the internet you are using. They are just mumbling nerds, right? Anyway, as for the evolution, it never states anywhere a species that evolved from feathered to scaled. I'm sure you're getting tired of pulling things out of your ass. Einstein was a genius not a "genious", don't put quotes and 'lern hw t spel'.
Ya, your a bright one. Thats correct science has brought many inventions, bravo for you on catching on to that fact. Yes, evilution ideology states that something can, given enough time, become anything. Thats the whole idea u shmuck, I see u like trolling my previous comments to steal phrases I have said already, thats pathetic. Grow up. Its genius, yes thats correct , I made a typo you want a doggie treat now?
@Uaz31 So- now I stand correct, creationists and Christians in general are uneducated selfish retards. Personal god, what the fuck dude? If you were an all powerful being you'd give two fucks about what you can create a million times over with a thought? Don't talk about ideaologies till you learn how 'ideology' is spelled. Now, go hide in your chapel where that priest was buttfucking you yesterday so you can lay off some steam. ;)
Have you ever burned to death a priests daughter who fornicated, or would you?
Ever killed a non believer?
Ever awarded the death penalty for sons of sinful fathers?
Do you really take your God literally, the same one, who out of 'proud' jealousy and respect of a selfish covenant, commanded Joshua to kill, pillage, rape, town after town.
I didn't use the word murder, because the Bible condones that 'sort' of killing.
No, I don't kill homosexuals, why would I? Thats not a commandment of the Bible.
Why would I burn a priests daughter who fornicated? That also is not a commandment in the Bible. I suggest you at least learn to read and go get a Bible to educate yourself before spewing garbage.
Sons of sinful fathers? Again, go read the Bible. Or at least give me some verses to correct you on.
God never commanded Joshua to rape anyone. The destruction I think your referring to, hard to know since u too lazy to give a verse, was never done out of selfishness. God is not capable of sin, the destruction done was out of judgement on those people not unlike the execution of a convicted murderer. God is the ultimate judge not your ideals or beliefs.
There be only so much ignorance that I can physcially comprehend. Love the work on, God speeding up light so that the Earth may look young. Deceitful no?
Love the work on Gravity, you clearly have not the slightest clue on the subject of linguistics.
No! Theories are testable observances united by facts.
Your method: I have the answer (bible) now lets look for the facts. AKA - Deductive reasoning.
Scientific Method: Here are the facts, lets explain them (theories)- Inductive reasoning.
Your full of ignorance so of coarse you can't comprehend. I never said God speeded up light, I said the light would not have needed to travel initially. For example, you can start a campfire and there would be light everywhere but then once it was out the embers would still be lit up.
You love the work on gravity? Did you even bother to research the theory, its not mine. I obviously know a great deal more than you do on the subject.
Look up the word theory in a dictionary, you only make a fool of yourself. Here I help you out I did the work for you. -" refers to contemplation or speculation, as opposed to action."
My method: Facts which solidify authenticity of scriptures. Your method: Preconceived notions upheld by assumptions and misconceptions of the sciences.
Amazing, apparently evolutionists dictate to the rest of the scientific community how old the Earth is, even though it is not in the field of biology to make such 'educated guesses'. To imply a conspiracy theory within the scientific community is just incomprehensible.
You have simply lost absolutely all credibility, mate.
"Amazing, apparently evolutionists dictate to the rest of the scientific community how old the Earth is..."
Yes, thats nothing new. In the earlier years they dictated that the Earth was flat and that the Universe revolved around the Earth. Anyone who opposed those beliefs were ridiculed. Your point is?
Evilution is not biology, thats a common misconception you Darwinians have. Biology has never revealed to us the age of the Earth, however there is plenty to suggest its much younger than previously thought.
Conspiracy theory? Im not implying it, its a well known fact that their is a religious attitude towards evilutionary ideologies in the scientific community at large. If your not in agreement then your ex-communicated from their religious sect of Darwinism.
You lost all crediblity with your very first comment. I could care less if I had your credibility as it would be worth squat unless of coarse I was a evilutionist then I could build on my presteige from other morons like yourself and become a well known pious fool.
@Uaz31 Evolution is not biology: correct Evolution has nothing to do with it: wrong.
Evolution is just part of the field of biology. It shows the changes in the genetic composition of a population during successive generations, as a result of natural selection acting on the genetic variation among individuals, and resulting in the development of new species. That's what evolution is by definition. Don't know what your priest was telling you while you were humping like 'dogs'.
Thats simply not true, evilution has nothing to do with biology. They try to mix them together and say that evilution is biology and then try to take credit for achievments in the field of biology. Evilution has nothing to do with biology, its a pseudo science, a religion really.
Evilution has never "showed changes in the genetic composition of a population" or any organism for that matter. Another falsehood they try to pass off as truth is that micro variations is also macro evilution, which is a complete lie. Variations within a species is all that is ever observed, never from one species to another. Thus evilutionary biology is nothing more than a religion desguised as a science.
@Uaz31 No- I think you are talking about creationism, that's with all being replacing biology and shit with ID. Lol, you're talking about your own party van over there, not evolution... and stop saying evilution and sound like a 6 year old hurr-durr kid. Also, yes, micro variations are EXACTLY what macro variations are on a smaller scale, hence they happen faster. Besides, where are your bases for it being a lie? We got fossils and scientists, you got a retarded book and uneducated creationists.
Intelligent design is a description of a perticular function of creation and has nothing to do with creationism unless referred to in that sense. ID is acknowledged by many people who do not believe in God.
Evilution is a proper terminology so Ill use it as there is nothing of virtue or value about the ideology.
No, macro is not micro on a smaller scale, micro is variations within a kind. Macro just plain doesn't happen. Fossils don't prove a thing about evilution, their just dead bones, theres no way to prove any of those bones had any offspring at all. As far as the so called human links skulls they are nothing but monkey skulls or human skulls none of them are half human skulls. And as I stated radiometric dating is not reliable, especially past known history.
You got scientists? lol. There are thousands of scientists who disagree with evilution. Uneducated? Some of the greatest minds were creationists, Albert Einstien was a creationist even tho he disagreed with the christian faith in part. and there are plenty of brilliant minds who disagree with your religion of evilution in and out of the Bibical faith.
@Uaz31 Haha, it's even more funny because you try to quit the conversation with dignity which you didn't have from the very beginning. Einstein was an Atheist, not a creationist. He just didn't bash on religious folks because he had better stuff to do than little old me. Creationists don't have a single brilliant mind in their group. And no scientist disagree with evolution, they are just skeptic about it, and that's just a few.
@Uaz31 And if radiometric dating is not reliable then is a fucking book more reliable? Shit, there are fucking trees in the amazon which are fucking older than the bible and those were counted with the ring thing the trees have. Don't remember how it's called. Also, microwave leftovers from the big bang, yeah, there was a point of singularity. So that alone crushes your theory since even as a singular mass, earth existed in that thing, it just took shape billions of years after it got out.
@Uaz31 Again, stop with the petty disregards about facts and then flaming on my intelligence for I have proven in every single comment my, and more or less all of the world's renown minds of the world's superior intelligence to yours. You can deny the facts all you want, just keep at the back of your mind, because YOU know what's true and you're just in constant denial, that you will live, and die in a world of pathetic excuses and lies. You brought this upon yourself.
The kind people at creation ministries for starters. The RATE team did some great work. But also even many who are not creationists who disagree with evilution basically because theres so many holes in the theory, yet they don't embrace creationism either. I don't feel like digging up names or interviewing people to do your homework for you but I do know this from personal experiences with talking with such people. Maybe you should do some research that not bias for a change?
Holes such as beneficial mutations, which are only prevailent in resistances but resistances are a result of a loss of information not a gain. There is no evidence for the massive amounts of information that would be required for evilutionary processes to occur. The fact that micro variations do not give evidence for macro evilution. The fact that fossils give no credit to the theory of evilution, theres no way to determine if any fossils had any offspring. Young earth evidence
lol, what a bunch of bull. First of all theres no way to accurately date the fossils, radiometric dating isn't reliable past known history, being 3,000 BC. Even within known history its questionable as to the correct dates. Theres no way to determine rates of decay remained constant for eons, its purely hypothetical psuedo science.
Secondly, I could line up line up a bunch of dog droppings and say they nicely fall into a branching tree too by shape. Extinct apes lowfossilcounts
Evolution isnt a theory, its a proved fact. Just because we - mankind - doesnt know everything - and I mean 100% - about our evolution YET doesnt mean that evolution is wrong.
Not so. Evilution is not a fact, its not even a possibility. Its a religion not a science. Theres not a single shread of evidence for evilution, never has been. Its based purely on speculation regarded as fact by ignorant people but never a proven fact.
*Moooooop* Deadly wrong. Evolution has been confirmed not only by biological sience but geology, chemie and physic as well. So dont try to fool me. If evolution isnt a fact than show me some facts that prove your standing. Nothing else will ever change my mind.
Thats simply not true, none of the sciences have proven evilution in any way. They say things like micro is macro evilution but thats not true. Micro variations happen within a kind of animal and that is observable but macro is a presumed changes that have never happened or been observed to happen, ever. Every single example the Darwinians use as evidence for this is not macro at all but micro variations and they try to pass it off by saying they are the same thing, its not.
Do they really say macro = micro? Micro evolution guids us to macro evolution, I guess they said that. Its just a matter of time. Not only therefore evolution is proved. ALL kinds of science would be wrong if evolution isnt a fact and as long as there is nothing that proves the opposite evolution will ever stay as a fact. Besides, I am still waiting for a good point to prove science wrong.
BTW: In Macro evolution you have big steps of evolution in micro you have small steps.
No they say micro is macro and no micro evilution doesnt guide us to macro, thats a false premise based on no factual observation nor any scientific evidence. There isn't any science built apon evilution, thats the other thing, that they try to make evilution appear to be a science. They confuse the two and say they are the same thing. For instance, evilutionary biology, when they discover something scientific they label it evilution when its really just biology, no more.
@Uaz31 Whatever you reply right now it better not be something you took out of your ass or another creationist's ass a.k.a. a creationist site. You either talk with scientific FACTS, which means, something that has been tested by a scientific team and not by a creationist that is just preaching about his holy troll. What evidence you have your theory is correct? I'm saying again, we have almost all the fossils that follow human evolution, what is YOUR evidence to the contrary?Bible doesn't count
@Uaz31 One last thing, I gave your channel 5 minutes of my life and what do you guess? You support sexism under the veil of 'order' since god's man's head and man's a woman's head and so on... and you block free speech under your videos by disabling comments, not to mention the fear mongering you do to gain followers... man, you're less than a lowlife, less than a parasite. I would put an amoeba higher than you in the evolutionary chain. I hope you kill yourself at May 21 2011. Judgment day lol.
@Uaz31 Oh- and before you attempt to start educating yourself, try opening a dictionary first because 'u' is not a word, evilution is not a word, and religion is the wrong word to use over the matter of evolution. Because up till now it has proven itself over and over with facts and physical evidence unlike your RELIGION.
"I never said God speeded up light, I said the light would not have needed to travel initially. For example, you can start a campfire and there would be light everywhere..."
- Wow. So this God apparently devises the laws of physics and the physical constance, however once he created the 'light' it didn't need to obey these laws, so how did it end up how it is now; if it "didn't" need to travel?
Unbelievable!!!! THE LIGHT FROM A CAMPFIRE DOES TRAVEL!!
Light travels at 180 000 mps for a reason. what does your example even mean?
Are you trying to convince me or yourself? You're literally the epitome of ignorance.
You virtually made no progress with that example. We don't notice the delay and if there was one we still wouldn't notice it. Do some research on the theory of relativity.
And again. Einstein was an atheist. But he was, however, a deistic believer in the "unknown of science". That's a God who devised the laws of physics etc...
Like I said, you have your answer, "God/Bible" - and then you look for facts to support it. What "excommunicated???" You mean like Ken Miller was excommunicated? You absolute fool. I can't begin to grasp how someone can believe this stuff. And not only that, but express it in [virtual] public. I thought I heard it all, but man, am I wrong.
@Uaz31 Also, no atheists clings and claims to have some credibility other than that of the theories they state. If you were educated you'd know how credible those were. And how you are using them in your every day life. But in any case. The only ones who claim on a fake credibility are christians and creationists. Both of which act as if they know the answers but when it comes to actual proof, weeell, they just think a book is all they really need, without physical evidence and what not.
@Uaz31 I don't see a single evidence for a young earth, Radioactive decay shows you are wrong by a few billion years, not to mention the age of fossils. As for creation, no evidence as well. I say the big bang did it which was in turn a collapse of membranes on the eleventh dimension. Yet again, that's just a theory, and I don't claim it's real. You are trying to pass creation as something real without providing sufficient evidence other than 'god did it' which is just retarded to say the least.
@Uaz31 Look, you are just ridiculous so lets stop it with this message:
Put a glass filled with water in front of you. Now, hide it from your sight with your hand and say. "This glass is empty." You can't see the glass so you might as well "BELIEVE" it's empty, but you know you filled the glass and what you are doing now is simply denial of facts. Something all Christians do. Denying something doesn't make it wrong when you know it's right. Especially when "ACTUAL" facts are involved.
@Uaz31 If you didn't get it, your arguments are your hand in front of you, an idiotic excuse for not wanting to trust the scientific facts because you then lose your little fantasy of an afterlife the way you imagined it for your whole life. I understand your denial, don't worry. As for you being educated, the arguments you posed were the same ones a priest gave me when I was 11, I simply crushed them and saw through how religion is a mere lie, closed minded and too 'in the box' for me.
@Uaz31 You see, that's our difference, you cling in your pack while atheists leave the pack as individuals in search for the real answers to this world. What this world is and why it's here and what we are doing here, while you stick in the comfort of your lies. You did it for thousands of years now and killed for that lie, because thinking that heaven's a lie is too much for your little minds to take... no afterlife = no life for you people, that's why you're so retarded and sad to watch.
@Uaz31 And last but not list, the climax of your retardation which offered me hours of entertainment and laughter after I read it: "they dictated that the Earth was flat and that the Universe revolved around the Earth" You are talking about christians who were burning people at the stake because they said the earth is not flat and that it wasn't the center of the world? Because that's more or less what happened in the 'dark ages of CHRISTIANITY' where technology and studies just died completely.
"You are talking about christians who were burning people atthe stake because they said the earth is not flat."
No,I wasn't talking about christiansat all here, don't know where u got that from. But yes, there was persecution for not believing what the "experts" of that day dictated was the consensus
Thedark ages were a result of a lack of the gospeland following of the Bibical principles and no thats not moreor less what happened. There was nospecific dark age of christianity.
@Uaz31 Unless you actually believe that the earth is flat still and want to burn all those scientists and their satanic science with them that dares to defy the 'word of gawd!'. Lol, fagot.
To tell you the truth I wouldn't expect any less from you, you have already proven to everyone you're an uneducated christfag with not only no credibility, but you yourself don't even know your own religion. Read the old testament then read the new, are they the same book? Why are they in the same religion?
No, the earth is not flat. Oh I see now you are resorting to insults again. That is rather revealing of your limitations to any real knowledge or understanding. You just carry on out of sheer ignorance, willful at that. Its really rather boring to me.
Yes the old and new testiment are the same book, the OT is the old covenant and the new is the New covenant thats what testament means, covenant.
@ Uaz31 I am getting tired of walking all over you so for your sake this conversation is terminated. Good luck on your delusions not every one wishes to share them. Good day.
There is plenty of proof for God. All of creation is "proof" of God as nothing cannot create something and ultimately as I demonstrated all must have a eternal source, which is just another way of saying God.
"Anecdotal evidence is not proof of Gods existance."
Oh but a big accidental explosion in space is suppose to be? lol. Its funny but sad that you cannot even acknowledge your own misconceptional flaw in logic. God says it best in the Bible, He calls it willful ignorance.
@Uaz31 Who said the explosion was accidental? There is much more to understand about the initial expansion of our universe then to characerize it as an accidental explosion as you put it. That is a strawman argument. Truth be told not much is known about the why of it, we just know it happened. Nothing is really known before the big bang either. But I think this video does a good job in pointing out how science is pushing back the curtain of the unknown however slowly.
@Uaz31 We know the Big Bang happened because of all the FACTUAL evidence which supports it. Microwave Background, expanding universe, known laws of physics.
Scientific theories are based on Facts, the word theory in science is not the same way it is used in the colloquial sense.
If its hogwash then dont watch the video's or learn anything about reality. Just stick your head in your book of fantasy and leave the rational logical critical thinking people alone.
@Seiku No kidding these kinds of people have eternity riding on it so your damn straight they are going to find ingenious ways to trick their selfs in to believing the rubbish that they spew. Think of it this way, even if you knew you were wrong you can not admit it because the chance of losing eternal life is much more severe then just being wrong. They've got eternity riding on their delusions. This is a BIG TICKET to give up for just intellictual integrity, reason, logic, and reality.
Cavitation in a liquid sphere demostrates how the big bang is possible. Gravity is probably the same princible as liquid dynamics. Our universe is a cavitated bubble within a body of some kind of density.
just lovely
MyDavidsun 1 month ago
beautiful
andreeaweed 1 month ago
Interesting video
TheSanovita 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
admirable
andreeaweed 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
admirable
TheSanovita 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
admirable
andreeaweed 1 month ago
Wew, 1 Billion Years, Good Vishual Video. Thanks for shared
Spasatcom 1 month ago
Good Vidoe Thanks for shared!! ^^__^^
directorygod 2 months ago
Wow. Fantascic Video!!..
ngeliatduit 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The dust of subatomic particles resulted after the collisions in LHC are particles of ethereal matter, even that the physicists give not them permission of existence! The electrical discharge to one Tesla coil was made and in a basin with water. Great was the surprise that the electrical discharge of the particles of electrical ether in water has the same ARBORESCENT SHAPE - proving the existence, and in water of the primary ethereal gravitational field.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
From 1967 I analyse with attention all published experiments concerning the accelerators of particles and the controlled thermonuclear fusion, moreover and the scriptural and paleoastronautical information. I had made only a logical and rational synthesis of the applied science, therefore my brothers- you block not the your sites and my computer. Please you to support me, how long, I still can produce such information.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Now, were collided particles in LHC and you seen that is nothimg: none Higgs boson, none Big-Bang, neither black holes, but only thousands of shards of ethereal particles.Therefore, now -return you physicists from your distraction at Isaac Newton with his universal attraction law= THE UNIFIED LAW OF THE MATTERS AND FORCES, at the eliminated ETHER by Einstein, at the unseen world of the ethereal and spiritual matters which fill up the Cosmos, and return you at the Lord- at God!
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The physicists show that about the discovery the Higgs boson it desire and the discovery the origins of the bodies'mass; the discovery the dark matter, the discovery the superior dimensions and the demonstration of the superposition. But as a result to the collisions of particles- the black holes had appeared not, the Big-Bang had appeared not demonstrating that the Large Hadron Collider bring not about us the Apocalipse.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
It say: with the exception of the Higgs boson all the predicted particles of Standard Model were detected and the them properties were measured with precision. The Standard Model of particles to arrived let be verified, but, if the Higgs boson is not finded, then the Standard Model and the others models will be necessary to be reconstruct from zero.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
In 1964 physicist Peter Higgs has thinked existence to one energetic field which penetrate whole Universe, and named it "Higgs field" and his particles named "Higgs boson"and that these can give mass the subatomic particles.Thus appear the necessity as in the CERN-frame let it construct an accelerator more big: the LARGE HADRON COLLIDER,which made the first collisions of particles in 14 December 2009, afterwards in 2010, in 2011 and they uncovered not the Higgs boson particles
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The movement of the celestial bodies in Cosmos demonstrates that these it can not maintain in the existent formation if not would exist and another matter which let complete and fill up the Cosmos. And this unknown matter, which is the eliminated ETHER- they named she: dark matter and dark energy, which is in proportion of 96% from the Cosmos's mass.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Already the protons, neutrons and electrons are formed through condensation and concentration of the etehreal particles. But how the ETHER has eliminated from physics, the physicists had invented the Standard Model of the particles and them forces excluding the gravity. Thus for to comprise and the gravity with her particles and forces they had invented and the strings theory.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The materials seem to be complicated and irregular at the sight with the free eye. But at microscope they it show simple and orderly. All the material shapes: animal. vegetal and mineral are made from atoms and these only from three constituents: protons, neutrons and electrons. The photon of light we see it and the photon of heat we feel it, but the ethereal particles are more small, of a few thousands time; we see not them now, but the our spirits see them.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Between 1930...1935 the discord was photon of light.The opinion of physicists had not adopted existence in flight to photon, and photon remain without mass. If photon has not mass, he cannot interact with nothing on trajectory and the light speed remain constant lengthways the trajectory. Thus, in place let to consider that the photons lose themselves the speed on way as result the them interaction with the intergalactic matter, they had set the Unuverse let it dilate entirely
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Today in front of our eyes and of the observation apparatuses it succedes all evolution phases of the celestial bodies, stars and galaxies. An evidence that the Universe doesn't seems to have an explosive beginning and doesn't seems to have ever an end in the his entirely. The facts demonstrates that in Universe the cyclical creation has place continuously in certain parts, and can has not place total creation in the same time in all the mass of the Universe.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
SandustanBrasov
As early as the time of Michael Faraday at scientific problems in contradiction, academical circles decided victory the some or another.In this optics of domination of certain conceptions: philosophical, theological and of other principles, in science had penetrated mistaken and fallacious theories, and the impossibility of immediate verification, to leaded at the creation others abstractings which had blocked the road of the scientific innovation with practical applications.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Today, on measure that the theory advances from classic mechanics to the quantum mechanics the particle and the wave are gradual dematerialize. The modern physics is blocked by enunciation of some laws and mistaken principles as: relativity theory, Hubble's law, postulation that the atom can't emit and absorb radiations continously, admitting the postulate what claims the photons without mass a.s.o. These guide- us at supernatural and at the technical and technological blocage
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Nikola Tesla argued that:" I hold that the space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can has not properties. Of properties it can speak only when it work with the matter which fill up the space. The empty space it can not curve because- something- can not action about -nothing". This relativity proceed from a philosophical direction, on which A.Einstein produce her when he was found in a state of technical and religious confusion.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
Sand ustanBrasov
Einstein ignore and vex over 100 of men of science which had signed a petition in which they upholded that the his relativity theory is wrongly. It renounce at the absolute space and absolute time, it arrive at the Lorentz-Einstein's transformations through the introduction to two factors- subunitary and superunitary what lead at the infinte mass phantoms, at the infinte energy phantoms and at the infinte impuls phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
As a result of the wrong interpretation of the Michelsom-Morley(1881)'s experiments which had demonstrated that the ETHER is entirely trained with the mass and the Earth's atmosphere, in 1905 A.Einstein renounced at the ether notion, at absolute space and set the relativist mecanics' base. He emits the two restricted relativity principles through which excludes the Ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement -the light speed and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Thus, the primary gravitational field it manifest as a solid body for the electrical ether and the electromagnetic phenomenons, and in the same time it manifest as a fluid body for the ethereal concentrated bodies and for the chemical bodies. We perceive the secondary gravitational field among the astral bodies. and in the electrical unloading's case which are ARBORESCENT we perceive and the primary gravitational field of the primary electrogenic particles.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
But celestial sources say us that whole Cosmos is filled with a dense powder of alive ethereal and electrogenic particles, and among they are streams of particles and more small because gravitational primary attraction among they, constituting primary gravitational field.But more exist,in the same space and secundary gravitational field produced by the ethereal concentrated particles in the ethereal bodies and in the chemical bodies which are neutral from electrical viewpoint.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
With much before Einstein, J.C.Maxwell starts from a mental experience, says that he generalize the Faraday's Electric Induction law and exclaims that the transmited wave would be a successive creation of magnetic fields and electric fields perpendicular between them and on the propagation direction. Since then it preachs the transmission of the electromagnetic wave at thousands kilometres without material suport.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Leibnitz(1646...1716) German scientist, forerunner of the mathematical logic, through the denial the newtonian space- time is and he a forerunner of the Einstein's relativity. Einstein considers the gravity as a property of the space and not in the least as a property of the matter which fill up this space. The Einstein's relativity is a geometrization of the space.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
SandustanBrasov
In the century XIX, the new scholars: Coulomb, Laplace, Ampere, Poisson, Green, Gauss, Webwer etc., had holded the action's theory at distance without material support, and they support only the mathematical abstracted theories. The science already started let it cover more much with the theory than with the practice.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The theory without logic and reason is and remain an non-reality.The science is at beginning a theory, but has logic and reason and become true after the her practical realisation.The space it stretch in Infinite and the time come from Infinite and it stretch in Infinite marking the reality of the ours material world seen and unseen.The faithless man believe not that exist the God with the our world seen and unseen and then this man can not think and judge with real elements.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
A.Einstein through the his relativity to REVERSED the reality of the our terresterial world. He remove the ETHER from physics and give materiality the space and the time. But the SPACE limit the place where it can unfolding material actions and the TIME mark the period of unfolding to some material actions. The space and the time are only ABSTRACT notions, absolute and colateral which show where and when it unfolding certain material actions.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The theorist physicist omit to study the science's history as let understand the things and phenomenons, but they learn only the exposed theory for to obtain a diploma, afterwards they twitter. We must let understand the science and how it was builded. Einstein has and good parts, but those mistaken are catastrophic. But Einstein was not single in the supporting the mistakes.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The theoretical mistakes from centuries XIX and XX, had been amplified and had passed noisily in century XXI. Many experiments and terrestrial and extraterrestrial observations was wrongly interpreted because theoretical physics indoctrinated with Einstein's relativity.Thus was started the investigation of subatomic particles without ethereal matters and was started the building of the ITER without to know the electrical ether and his role in the working of the magnetic trap
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
If in 1905 Einstein excludes the ETHER from physics, viz excludes the intergalactic matter, then the his disciples arrive with the relativity theory at Big-Bang, at black holes, holes of worm, at singularity and today at travel in time. Thus the great explosion of George Gamov and his fellows R.A.Ipher and R.C.Hermann, become cosmological standardized theory which is one great bluff!
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
Great video!
MyDavidsun 2 months ago 2
Paranoid schizophrenic pseudoscientific kook below.
drrobertoboogie97 5 months ago
SandustanBrasov
And yet, we can see, we can visualize the ethereal matter. The scheme to one device for to visualize the ethereal matter: EXIST! And this device it can realize!
My e-mail: s.stan65@yahoo.com
You Tube: sandustanBrasov’s Channel
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The matter of the our terrestrial globe has four states of aggregation: solid, liquid, gseous and ethereal and not three after official science. The matter on which we see it, proceed from the ethereal matter, which from cancentration in concentration it had constituted in the electrons, in protons respectivel;y in the atoms of the chemical elements which had overtaken at the gaseous, liquid and solid state. All the matter on which we see it, is condensed ether.
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
SandustanBrasov
The GRAVITY’s PARTICLES as aproximately the smallest ethereal particles, constitute the most general ethereal aggregation state from nature, with the largest temperature interval, from zero Kelvin degrees to millions of degrees in stars.That is an aggregation state which coexist with all others aggregation states(solid, liquid, gaseous, ethereal) and on which it influenced them. The actual official science is mistaken in great proportion because this has not in sight the Ether
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The ACTUAL ELECTRICAL GENERATORS : galvanic elements and electrical accumulators; dynamos and alternators; thermoelements and photoelectric cell - transform nothing, but they only gather the electrical energy= the particles of the electrical ether which exist in metals, in the environing medium, in the thermic radiation or in the ray of light!
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
SandustanBrasov
The ELECTRICAL CURRENT consist in circulation in the round and in lengthways to one electrical conductor to the particles of electrical ether guided on the magnetic field from the round the conductor; magnetic field formed all from particles of electrical ether coupled head at head and expelled in concentric circles in the round the conductor.If it interrupt the electrical current, then it decompose and this magnetic field in particles of electrical ether and it drain in circuit
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The ELECTRON is not an exclusive electrical load, but an elementary particle from the composition of any atom, and is only a particle with intermediate role in the unfolding of the electrical phenomenons. The REAL ELECTRCAL LOAD is a particle of electrical ether more nore small than the electron, has and she a personal and rapid rotation, producing a personal magnetic field, which it gear with the magnetic field from the round of one electrical conductor.
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL MATTER is the visible matter with free eye and is constituted from atoms of the chemical elements. The PHYSICAL-ETHEREAL MATTER is a matter with atoms more small with 7..8 order of dimension than the atoms of chemical elements, and the bodies formed from this matter are invisible for the human eye. The ETHEREAL PHYSICS it occupy with the study of the ethereal matters, but which was abandoned in the XX century, because in 1905 A.Einstein excludes the ether
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
• SandustanBrasov But the ETHER is a physical reality constituted from a very small matter, invisible for human eye, and is formed from atoms more small with 7...8 order of dimension than the atoms of the chemical elements. The matter of the ether penetrate in all the visible bodies and is the physical matter which fills both the interplanetary space and the interatomic space. The ether is a matter with mass and weigth, being subdued and she the action of the universal attraction law.
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
After Mendeleev's opinion is possible and necessary the extension of periodical system for other size's order - more small- of the ethereal matter particles. About the absolute vacuum space, M.Faraday had the certitude that it doesn't exist, and it exists only an incomplte vacuum whose spatial magnetic state is of the most importance for the natures phenomenons.
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
D.I.Mendeleev had shown through 1860:"Studying the ether which penetrate in all the bodies and asking myself the question: from what is formed this ether's mass, I had admitted the idea that theirs atoms, or his matter represent the primary matter, from which are formed all atoms. The existence to the one light mass, to the one light substance and less of chemical forces, is possibly but, is even necessary".
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
SandustanBrasov If in 1905 Einstein excludes the ether from physics, viz excludes the intergalactic matter, then the his fanatical disciples, the his theoretical parrots, arrive with the rlativity theory at Big bang, at black holes, holes of worm, at singularity and today at the travel in time. Thus, the great explosion of George Gamov and his follows R.A.Ipfer and R.C.Hermann become cosmological standardized theory, but which is one great bluff!
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
SandustanBrasov
In 1930..1935 apple of discord was the photon of light. General opinion of the physicists had adopted the viewpoint which upholded not the existence's idea in flight to photon. Thus they had allowed the photon without mass.If the photon has not mass, he can't interact with nothing on trajectory and the light speed remain constant.In place let to consider that the photons lose the speed on way following them interaction with the meeted matter, they had set the Universe let dilate
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Today, on measure that the theory advances from classic mechanics to the quantum mechanics the particle and wave are gradual dematerialize.The modern physics is blocked by enounciation of some laws and mistaken principles as: relativity theory;Hubble's low, poastulation that the atom can't emit and absorb radiations continuously, admitting the postulate what claims the photons without mass a.s.o.These guide us at supernatural, and at the technical and technological blockage.
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Nikola Tesla argued that:"I hold that the space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can has not properties. Of properties it can speak only when it work with the matter which fill up the space. The empty space it can not curve because - something - can not action about - nothing". This relativity proceed from a philosophical direction, on which A.Einstein produce her when he was found in a state of technical and religious confusion.
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Einstein considers the gravity as a property of the space and not in the least as a property of the matter which fill up this space. The relativity theory of the Einstein is a geometrization of the space. Leibnitz(1646...1716) German scientist, forerunner of the mathematical logic, through the denial the newtonian space-time is and he a forerunner of the Einstein's relativity.
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
• Were introduced in physics the infinite mass phantoms, the infinite energy phantoms and the infinite impulse phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed in vacuum. Today we know that many particles were accelerate unill at the light speed, others had arrived with this speed from cosmos, but at none grow up not at infinite or near of infinite the mass, the energy or the impulse.
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
It renounce thus at the absolute space and at the absolute time. From the simple and linear transformations of the Galilei's relativity it arrive at the Lorentz- Einstein's transformations through the introduction to two factors, subunitary and superunitary. Thus, with these confusions about space and time it passed at the adequate changes about the whole physics.
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Actually Einstein, from theoretical confusion and of megalomania, establish that none object with mass can not outrun the light speed.He succeeding, how written publications of the time, let vex much people, then, whenever over a hundred of people of science had signed a petition in which they upholded that the relativity theory is mistaken, is fallacious.Einstein upholded his relativity theory, believing in the fact that then, nobody can not to demonstrate him the contrary.
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The science has and history. In the Fundamental Principle of Democrit(470..380BC) it show:"From nothing nothing's born, nothing that exist can not be destroyed and any transformation consist from a reunion and separation...Out of atoms and ether. all rest is not otherwise than rationament and not exist...The spirit as well as the ether consist of a small and spherical atoms, very mobile, atoms that their movement form the phenomenon of life".
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Through the relativity theory to Einstein of over century, it hold with strenght -as a conspiracy a general activity of intellectual stultify of the planetary population. from relativity theory proceed the notion of: singularity, Big bang, black holes and holes of worm. From 1905 and till now in 2011, the disciples of the Einstein, preach with contumely as scientific elements of high class these theoretical confusions, these absurdities from which they had made a business.
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The notion of dark matter and dark energy proceed from theoretical physics, from relativity theory of the A. Einstein, from the mistaken interpretation of the physical reality. Something exist indeed: and matter and energy; but is the much ethereal matter and the her energys from the her frame. Dark energy and cosmic acceleration are a failure of relativity of the Einstein.
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
• SandustanBrasov In 1905, A.Einstein conclude that the ether hasn't a correspondent in reality and constitute not a medium which let can serve as reference system. Thus Einstein renounced to the ether notion and absolute space and emits the two restricted relativity principles. By it content the second principle excludes the ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement - the light speed - and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality.
sandustanBrasov 7 months ago
Ok, I have to ask this. Is our lil bitty planet the BEST place to conduct experiments like this? Here's my reason for asking this. We're trying to find out what happened in the first few moments of the universes life. We kinda have an idea of what went down but we really don't know. Who's to say that that there wasn't strange or different types of matter that initially happened in the big bang that disappeared a long time ago wouldn't make our current matter unstable?
Elpha22 11 months ago
lissssssp ;p
BouyertheDestroyer 1 year ago
Hope LHC will discover Higgs Boson soon.
muzammilali007 1 year ago
Phil Owen here, the guy who made the video. Thanks for the upload, added music and all the great comments! Sorry for my terrible narration, makes me cringe as well, was a rushed job with a few days of no sleep, ;{ Makes me really respect pro narrators after this.
philowenify 1 year ago 12
@philowenify Awesome stuff, great job on this. And great narrating in my opinion.
Barrettatsumaki 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Uaz31
"The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation, no matter how subtle, can (for me) change this." - In a letter to Gutkind.
ElDuorPaso 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation, no matter how subtle, can (for me) change this." -Einstein wrote to Gutkind
ElDuorPaso 1 year ago
Comment removed
ElDuorPaso 1 year ago
To all Christians, Gravity is a theory too, trust me- I am a faithful fellow christian that believes in our beloved father in heaven and our holy book that clearly states the world is 6k years old, if you jump from buildings you can actually fly because gravity is only an idea the satanic scientists have implanted in your brains, free yourselves and believe in lord and savior Jebus then commit massive sui- I mean fly and become one with the sky trol- I mean our beloved trinity monotheistic god.
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Razgrits
Bible doesn't state the world is 6k old. A careful study of the Bibical timeline reaches back to 11,013 B.C. which would be 13,022 years old.
Gravity actually is a theory, currently another theory challenges the whole concept of gravity, that there could possibly be several forces at work instead of idea of gravity, which is speculated as a result of mass. You call it gravity but its really a unknown force or forces, gravity is only really a educated guess not a fact.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31
Your kidding right. Gravity is true whether you like it or not.
There is absolutely nothing, nothing that contradicts gravity. We can simulate zero gravity for a reason. It doesn't matter what you name it. Gravity is gravity, as we know it and it will always be there, we just don't understand it on a molecular, or quantum basis.
A theory is not an educated guess. Theories are considered higher than facts in the science realm, because theories unite facts.
ElDuorPaso 1 year ago
@ElDuorPaso
You don't understand the fact that "gravity" is a word used to describe a perticular theory. Of coarse we know there is a force(s) at work, that is not in question and yes it does matter what you name it because of the descriptions implied. We don't call the sun a moon or a waterfall a lake for a reason.
Lol. Sorry guy but theories are in no way facts, altho many may in fact be true they are not proven facts thats why they are called theories in the first place.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31
Gravity can simply be expanded on. It's presence, although, is unmistakable and undeniable.
It doesn't matter whether it is 6500 years old or 10000+ years old.
There is a reason why we can see the furthest galaxy from us, which is 13.23 billion light years. Meaning the light took 13 billion years to reach us. The fact of the matter is that they are both wrong. If everything were created within 7 days, that would imply that everything should only be date several days from each other,
ElDuorPaso 1 year ago
@ElDuorPaso
"Meaning the light took 13 billion years to reach us. "
No, it means it would take 13 billion years to reach us, doesn't mean it did in fact take 13 billion years. That light would have been here at those stars creation and therefore would not have had to initially travel. God said, " Let there be light" not, ok now Im going to wait 13 billion years for that light I created to get here.
Bibical creation happened in 6 days not 7 and yes everything was created within days.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31
... The scientific method clearly states that the Earth is 4.5 billion years old. If it were 10000 years old it would show, 10000, not 4.5 billion.
And please don't invoke the gap theory, or non-literal meaning of 7 days. If you can't take your God literally, then what kind of God is that? A God who purposefully choses to deceive us.
ElDuorPaso 1 year ago
@ElDuorPaso
The scientific method states no such thing that the Earth is 4.5 billion years old, thats complete nonsense. Thats what the evilutionists want to believe but science does not give any credance to that idea. There is much more evidence for a young Earth of only thousands of years than that of one which is billions or even millions.
Gap theory is not correct, the Bible clearly states literal 24 hour periods in reference to the days of creation. Of coarse I take God literally.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 So, radioactive decay means nothing to Creationists and of course, since creationists are all scientists and because Einstein was a creationist too it means that science doesn't believe in radioactive decay, right? And just for your info, don't take me literally, Einstein was an atheist just didn't bother himself with theists. Also, creationists aren't real scientists, and never will be. Radioactive decay IS science and Science uses it for various reasons. One is counting the earth's age.
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Razgrits
What about radioactive decay? If your referring to radiometric dating that cannot possibly be accounted accurate past known history which would be 3,000 B.C. as its all assumption then, they assume the rates have remained constant, thats not fact thats fiction.
Einstein was not in any way an atheist. He believed in a non-personnal God, the only reason he rejected the christian faith was that he didnt want to acknowledge a God who would allow so much suffering.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 I can keep walking all over you, the point is, what you can give me are links from random untrusted creationists sources and I can just through back a quote from a world renown scientist and shatter your argument with realistic facts. You can live all you want in your little fantasy world with a promise of the afterlife while I enjoy my current life to it's fullest without having to worship anyone, and look for the real answers without having to blame it on an imaginary sky troll.
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Razgrits
world renown doesn't mean they are right. God resists the proud pious fools didnt u know? Even Einstein as bright as he was, he was also a childish fool to think that there could be such think as a non personal God, it defies the very concept of God and he was a "genious".
Fantasy world?! lol. Nah my outlook it based on facts, science is nothing more than the exploration of God's creation. Evilutionary ideaology isn't, feathers to scales lol, thats the real fantasy.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 Of course it doesn't mean they are right, it just so happens that they are the reason we have cars instead of horses and telephones instead of sending birds around. Lets not mention the internet you are using. They are just mumbling nerds, right? Anyway, as for the evolution, it never states anywhere a species that evolved from feathered to scaled. I'm sure you're getting tired of pulling things out of your ass. Einstein was a genius not a "genious", don't put quotes and 'lern hw t spel'.
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Razgrits
Ya, your a bright one. Thats correct science has brought many inventions, bravo for you on catching on to that fact. Yes, evilution ideology states that something can, given enough time, become anything. Thats the whole idea u shmuck, I see u like trolling my previous comments to steal phrases I have said already, thats pathetic. Grow up. Its genius, yes thats correct , I made a typo you want a doggie treat now?
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 So- now I stand correct, creationists and Christians in general are uneducated selfish retards. Personal god, what the fuck dude? If you were an all powerful being you'd give two fucks about what you can create a million times over with a thought? Don't talk about ideaologies till you learn how 'ideology' is spelled. Now, go hide in your chapel where that priest was buttfucking you yesterday so you can lay off some steam. ;)
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Razgrits
Yes a personal God, I suggest you look up the word "personal" in a dictionary.
Yes, its ideology and Ill talk about whatever I want whenever I want. Anything else I can educate you on kid?
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 LOL U MAD?! :D
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Razgrits
Mad? Not sure what your referring to. If you mean mad at the fact that there are so many ignorant people such as yourself then yes.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31
So you take your God literally?
Do you kill homosexuals?
Have you ever burned to death a priests daughter who fornicated, or would you?
Ever killed a non believer?
Ever awarded the death penalty for sons of sinful fathers?
Do you really take your God literally, the same one, who out of 'proud' jealousy and respect of a selfish covenant, commanded Joshua to kill, pillage, rape, town after town.
I didn't use the word murder, because the Bible condones that 'sort' of killing.
ElDuorPaso 1 year ago
@ElDuorPaso
Of coarse I take God literally, why wouldn't I?
No, I don't kill homosexuals, why would I? Thats not a commandment of the Bible.
Why would I burn a priests daughter who fornicated? That also is not a commandment in the Bible. I suggest you at least learn to read and go get a Bible to educate yourself before spewing garbage.
Sons of sinful fathers? Again, go read the Bible. Or at least give me some verses to correct you on.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@ElDuorPaso
God never commanded Joshua to rape anyone. The destruction I think your referring to, hard to know since u too lazy to give a verse, was never done out of selfishness. God is not capable of sin, the destruction done was out of judgement on those people not unlike the execution of a convicted murderer. God is the ultimate judge not your ideals or beliefs.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@ElDuorPaso
And no it wasn't murder because murder means to kill with malicious intent, this was a judgement on them not murder there is a difference.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31
There be only so much ignorance that I can physcially comprehend. Love the work on, God speeding up light so that the Earth may look young. Deceitful no?
Love the work on Gravity, you clearly have not the slightest clue on the subject of linguistics.
No! Theories are testable observances united by facts.
Your method: I have the answer (bible) now lets look for the facts. AKA - Deductive reasoning.
Scientific Method: Here are the facts, lets explain them (theories)- Inductive reasoning.
ElDuorPaso 1 year ago
@ElDuorPaso
Your full of ignorance so of coarse you can't comprehend. I never said God speeded up light, I said the light would not have needed to travel initially. For example, you can start a campfire and there would be light everywhere but then once it was out the embers would still be lit up.
You love the work on gravity? Did you even bother to research the theory, its not mine. I obviously know a great deal more than you do on the subject.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@ElDuorPaso
Look up the word theory in a dictionary, you only make a fool of yourself. Here I help you out I did the work for you. -" refers to contemplation or speculation, as opposed to action."
My method: Facts which solidify authenticity of scriptures. Your method: Preconceived notions upheld by assumptions and misconceptions of the sciences.
Uaz31 1 year ago
Comment removed
ElDuorPaso 1 year ago
@Uaz31
Amazing, apparently evolutionists dictate to the rest of the scientific community how old the Earth is, even though it is not in the field of biology to make such 'educated guesses'. To imply a conspiracy theory within the scientific community is just incomprehensible.
You have simply lost absolutely all credibility, mate.
ElDuorPaso 1 year ago
@ElDuorPaso
"Amazing, apparently evolutionists dictate to the rest of the scientific community how old the Earth is..."
Yes, thats nothing new. In the earlier years they dictated that the Earth was flat and that the Universe revolved around the Earth. Anyone who opposed those beliefs were ridiculed. Your point is?
Uaz31 1 year ago
@ElDuorPaso
Evilution is not biology, thats a common misconception you Darwinians have. Biology has never revealed to us the age of the Earth, however there is plenty to suggest its much younger than previously thought.
Conspiracy theory? Im not implying it, its a well known fact that their is a religious attitude towards evilutionary ideologies in the scientific community at large. If your not in agreement then your ex-communicated from their religious sect of Darwinism.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@ElDuorPaso
You lost all crediblity with your very first comment. I could care less if I had your credibility as it would be worth squat unless of coarse I was a evilutionist then I could build on my presteige from other morons like yourself and become a well known pious fool.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 Evolution is not biology: correct Evolution has nothing to do with it: wrong.
Evolution is just part of the field of biology. It shows the changes in the genetic composition of a population during successive generations, as a result of natural selection acting on the genetic variation among individuals, and resulting in the development of new species. That's what evolution is by definition. Don't know what your priest was telling you while you were humping like 'dogs'.
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Razgrits
"Evolution is just part of the field of biology"
Thats simply not true, evilution has nothing to do with biology. They try to mix them together and say that evilution is biology and then try to take credit for achievments in the field of biology. Evilution has nothing to do with biology, its a pseudo science, a religion really.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Razgrits
Evilution has never "showed changes in the genetic composition of a population" or any organism for that matter. Another falsehood they try to pass off as truth is that micro variations is also macro evilution, which is a complete lie. Variations within a species is all that is ever observed, never from one species to another. Thus evilutionary biology is nothing more than a religion desguised as a science.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 No- I think you are talking about creationism, that's with all being replacing biology and shit with ID. Lol, you're talking about your own party van over there, not evolution... and stop saying evilution and sound like a 6 year old hurr-durr kid. Also, yes, micro variations are EXACTLY what macro variations are on a smaller scale, hence they happen faster. Besides, where are your bases for it being a lie? We got fossils and scientists, you got a retarded book and uneducated creationists.
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Razgrits
" I think you are talking about creationism"
Creationism has never claimed to be a science.
Intelligent design is a description of a perticular function of creation and has nothing to do with creationism unless referred to in that sense. ID is acknowledged by many people who do not believe in God.
Evilution is a proper terminology so Ill use it as there is nothing of virtue or value about the ideology.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Razgrits
No, macro is not micro on a smaller scale, micro is variations within a kind. Macro just plain doesn't happen. Fossils don't prove a thing about evilution, their just dead bones, theres no way to prove any of those bones had any offspring at all. As far as the so called human links skulls they are nothing but monkey skulls or human skulls none of them are half human skulls. And as I stated radiometric dating is not reliable, especially past known history.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Razgrits
You got scientists? lol. There are thousands of scientists who disagree with evilution. Uneducated? Some of the greatest minds were creationists, Albert Einstien was a creationist even tho he disagreed with the christian faith in part. and there are plenty of brilliant minds who disagree with your religion of evilution in and out of the Bibical faith.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 Haha, it's even more funny because you try to quit the conversation with dignity which you didn't have from the very beginning. Einstein was an Atheist, not a creationist. He just didn't bash on religious folks because he had better stuff to do than little old me. Creationists don't have a single brilliant mind in their group. And no scientist disagree with evolution, they are just skeptic about it, and that's just a few.
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Uaz31 And if radiometric dating is not reliable then is a fucking book more reliable? Shit, there are fucking trees in the amazon which are fucking older than the bible and those were counted with the ring thing the trees have. Don't remember how it's called. Also, microwave leftovers from the big bang, yeah, there was a point of singularity. So that alone crushes your theory since even as a singular mass, earth existed in that thing, it just took shape billions of years after it got out.
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Uaz31 Again, stop with the petty disregards about facts and then flaming on my intelligence for I have proven in every single comment my, and more or less all of the world's renown minds of the world's superior intelligence to yours. You can deny the facts all you want, just keep at the back of your mind, because YOU know what's true and you're just in constant denial, that you will live, and die in a world of pathetic excuses and lies. You brought this upon yourself.
Razgrits 1 year ago
Comment removed
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Uaz31 "There are thousands of scientists who disagree with evilution. "
Name one.
Helge129 1 year ago
@Helge129
The kind people at creation ministries for starters. The RATE team did some great work. But also even many who are not creationists who disagree with evilution basically because theres so many holes in the theory, yet they don't embrace creationism either. I don't feel like digging up names or interviewing people to do your homework for you but I do know this from personal experiences with talking with such people. Maybe you should do some research that not bias for a change?
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 Once again: What holes? There are no holes in the theory of evolution. Claiming stuff but not backing it up isn't exactly a good idea.
Helge129 1 year ago
@Helge1
Holes such as beneficial mutations, which are only prevailent in resistances but resistances are a result of a loss of information not a gain. There is no evidence for the massive amounts of information that would be required for evilutionary processes to occur. The fact that micro variations do not give evidence for macro evilution. The fact that fossils give no credit to the theory of evilution, theres no way to determine if any fossils had any offspring. Young earth evidence
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 Not this again. The fossils all together nicely fall into a branching tree by shape and age.
Helge129 1 year ago
@Helge129
lol, what a bunch of bull. First of all theres no way to accurately date the fossils, radiometric dating isn't reliable past known history, being 3,000 BC. Even within known history its questionable as to the correct dates. Theres no way to determine rates of decay remained constant for eons, its purely hypothetical psuedo science.
Secondly, I could line up line up a bunch of dog droppings and say they nicely fall into a branching tree too by shape. Extinct apes lowfossilcounts
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31
Evolution isnt a theory, its a proved fact. Just because we - mankind - doesnt know everything - and I mean 100% - about our evolution YET doesnt mean that evolution is wrong.
TheRealDetoNato 1 year ago
@TheRealDetoNato
Not so. Evilution is not a fact, its not even a possibility. Its a religion not a science. Theres not a single shread of evidence for evilution, never has been. Its based purely on speculation regarded as fact by ignorant people but never a proven fact.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31
*Moooooop* Deadly wrong. Evolution has been confirmed not only by biological sience but geology, chemie and physic as well. So dont try to fool me. If evolution isnt a fact than show me some facts that prove your standing. Nothing else will ever change my mind.
TheRealDetoNato 1 year ago
@TheRealDetoNato
Thats simply not true, none of the sciences have proven evilution in any way. They say things like micro is macro evilution but thats not true. Micro variations happen within a kind of animal and that is observable but macro is a presumed changes that have never happened or been observed to happen, ever. Every single example the Darwinians use as evidence for this is not macro at all but micro variations and they try to pass it off by saying they are the same thing, its not.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31
Do they really say macro = micro? Micro evolution guids us to macro evolution, I guess they said that. Its just a matter of time. Not only therefore evolution is proved. ALL kinds of science would be wrong if evolution isnt a fact and as long as there is nothing that proves the opposite evolution will ever stay as a fact. Besides, I am still waiting for a good point to prove science wrong.
BTW: In Macro evolution you have big steps of evolution in micro you have small steps.
TheRealDetoNato 1 year ago
@TheRealDetoNato
No they say micro is macro and no micro evilution doesnt guide us to macro, thats a false premise based on no factual observation nor any scientific evidence. There isn't any science built apon evilution, thats the other thing, that they try to make evilution appear to be a science. They confuse the two and say they are the same thing. For instance, evilutionary biology, when they discover something scientific they label it evilution when its really just biology, no more.
Uaz31 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheRealDetoNato 1 year ago
@Uaz31
And dont come up with some lame point since evolution already has been proved and nothing else was able to stand against those proves.
TheRealDetoNato 1 year ago
@Uaz31 Whatever you reply right now it better not be something you took out of your ass or another creationist's ass a.k.a. a creationist site. You either talk with scientific FACTS, which means, something that has been tested by a scientific team and not by a creationist that is just preaching about his holy troll. What evidence you have your theory is correct? I'm saying again, we have almost all the fossils that follow human evolution, what is YOUR evidence to the contrary?Bible doesn't count
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Razgrits
Only comments I see taken out of an ass are yours. Just like you took that comment from me and now use it as your own. Pathetic.
I tire of this conversation, its like trying to have a conversation with a 2 year old, which Im sure your not much older than that.
I think, Ill leave u to sulk in your own ignorance now...I tire of u.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 One last thing, I gave your channel 5 minutes of my life and what do you guess? You support sexism under the veil of 'order' since god's man's head and man's a woman's head and so on... and you block free speech under your videos by disabling comments, not to mention the fear mongering you do to gain followers... man, you're less than a lowlife, less than a parasite. I would put an amoeba higher than you in the evolutionary chain. I hope you kill yourself at May 21 2011. Judgment day lol.
Razgrits 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Uaz31 Oh- and before you attempt to start educating yourself, try opening a dictionary first because 'u' is not a word, evilution is not a word, and religion is the wrong word to use over the matter of evolution. Because up till now it has proven itself over and over with facts and physical evidence unlike your RELIGION.
LOL, U MAD AGUN? 8D
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Uaz31
"I never said God speeded up light, I said the light would not have needed to travel initially. For example, you can start a campfire and there would be light everywhere..."
- Wow. So this God apparently devises the laws of physics and the physical constance, however once he created the 'light' it didn't need to obey these laws, so how did it end up how it is now; if it "didn't" need to travel?
Unbelievable!!!! THE LIGHT FROM A CAMPFIRE DOES TRAVEL!!
It DOESN'T just spontaneously appear.
ElDuorPaso 1 year ago
@Uaz31
Light travels at 180 000 mps for a reason. what does your example even mean?
Are you trying to convince me or yourself? You're literally the epitome of ignorance.
You virtually made no progress with that example. We don't notice the delay and if there was one we still wouldn't notice it. Do some research on the theory of relativity.
And again. Einstein was an atheist. But he was, however, a deistic believer in the "unknown of science". That's a God who devised the laws of physics etc...
ElDuorPaso 1 year ago
@Uaz31
Absolutely zilch in the respect of creationism. Again, are you trying to convince me/us or yourself? Because you fail big time in both.
He talked about the "mind of God", never "God the creator" - You clearly do not even know the difference between deistic & theistic.
Ahahahaha "scientific theory" & "[textbook] theory" are not the same lolololol - "Look in the dictionary" haha
You make no logic assertions, you just take my comments and twist them around, "My method... Your method" -lolol
ElDuorPaso 1 year ago
@Uaz31
Like I said, you have your answer, "God/Bible" - and then you look for facts to support it. What "excommunicated???" You mean like Ken Miller was excommunicated? You absolute fool. I can't begin to grasp how someone can believe this stuff. And not only that, but express it in [virtual] public. I thought I heard it all, but man, am I wrong.
Here's a quote from "creationist" Einstein:
ElDuorPaso 1 year ago
Comment removed
ElDuorPaso 1 year ago
Comment removed
ElDuorPaso 1 year ago
Comment removed
Uaz31 1 year ago 2
@Uaz31 Also, no atheists clings and claims to have some credibility other than that of the theories they state. If you were educated you'd know how credible those were. And how you are using them in your every day life. But in any case. The only ones who claim on a fake credibility are christians and creationists. Both of which act as if they know the answers but when it comes to actual proof, weeell, they just think a book is all they really need, without physical evidence and what not.
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Razgrits
"no atheists clings and claims to have some credibility other than that of the theories they state"
You don't speak for all atheists chump and your statement here has nothing to do with what I have said. "If you were educated .."
Im very well educated, more than most what else would you like to learn about?
"without physical evidence and what not."
There is plenty of physical evidence for a young earth, as for God...well creation is all around us.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 I don't see a single evidence for a young earth, Radioactive decay shows you are wrong by a few billion years, not to mention the age of fossils. As for creation, no evidence as well. I say the big bang did it which was in turn a collapse of membranes on the eleventh dimension. Yet again, that's just a theory, and I don't claim it's real. You are trying to pass creation as something real without providing sufficient evidence other than 'god did it' which is just retarded to say the least.
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Uaz31 Look, you are just ridiculous so lets stop it with this message:
Put a glass filled with water in front of you. Now, hide it from your sight with your hand and say. "This glass is empty." You can't see the glass so you might as well "BELIEVE" it's empty, but you know you filled the glass and what you are doing now is simply denial of facts. Something all Christians do. Denying something doesn't make it wrong when you know it's right. Especially when "ACTUAL" facts are involved.
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Uaz31 If you didn't get it, your arguments are your hand in front of you, an idiotic excuse for not wanting to trust the scientific facts because you then lose your little fantasy of an afterlife the way you imagined it for your whole life. I understand your denial, don't worry. As for you being educated, the arguments you posed were the same ones a priest gave me when I was 11, I simply crushed them and saw through how religion is a mere lie, closed minded and too 'in the box' for me.
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Uaz31 You see, that's our difference, you cling in your pack while atheists leave the pack as individuals in search for the real answers to this world. What this world is and why it's here and what we are doing here, while you stick in the comfort of your lies. You did it for thousands of years now and killed for that lie, because thinking that heaven's a lie is too much for your little minds to take... no afterlife = no life for you people, that's why you're so retarded and sad to watch.
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Uaz31 And last but not list, the climax of your retardation which offered me hours of entertainment and laughter after I read it: "they dictated that the Earth was flat and that the Universe revolved around the Earth" You are talking about christians who were burning people at the stake because they said the earth is not flat and that it wasn't the center of the world? Because that's more or less what happened in the 'dark ages of CHRISTIANITY' where technology and studies just died completely.
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Rgrits
"You are talking about christians who were burning people atthe stake because they said the earth is not flat."
No,I wasn't talking about christiansat all here, don't know where u got that from. But yes, there was persecution for not believing what the "experts" of that day dictated was the consensus
Thedark ages were a result of a lack of the gospeland following of the Bibical principles and no thats not moreor less what happened. There was nospecific dark age of christianity.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 Unless you actually believe that the earth is flat still and want to burn all those scientists and their satanic science with them that dares to defy the 'word of gawd!'. Lol, fagot.
To tell you the truth I wouldn't expect any less from you, you have already proven to everyone you're an uneducated christfag with not only no credibility, but you yourself don't even know your own religion. Read the old testament then read the new, are they the same book? Why are they in the same religion?
Razgrits 1 year ago
@Razgrits
No, the earth is not flat. Oh I see now you are resorting to insults again. That is rather revealing of your limitations to any real knowledge or understanding. You just carry on out of sheer ignorance, willful at that. Its really rather boring to me.
Yes the old and new testiment are the same book, the OT is the old covenant and the new is the New covenant thats what testament means, covenant.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@ Uaz31 I am getting tired of walking all over you so for your sake this conversation is terminated. Good luck on your delusions not every one wishes to share them. Good day.
McGeeRF 1 year ago
"Except, there is no proof for God..."
There is plenty of proof for God. All of creation is "proof" of God as nothing cannot create something and ultimately as I demonstrated all must have a eternal source, which is just another way of saying God.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 "There is plenty of proof for God. All of creation is "proof" of God" Anecdotal evidence is not proof of Gods existance.
McGeeRF 1 year ago
@McGeeRF
"Anecdotal evidence is not proof of Gods existance."
Oh but a big accidental explosion in space is suppose to be? lol. Its funny but sad that you cannot even acknowledge your own misconceptional flaw in logic. God says it best in the Bible, He calls it willful ignorance.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 Who said the explosion was accidental? There is much more to understand about the initial expansion of our universe then to characerize it as an accidental explosion as you put it. That is a strawman argument. Truth be told not much is known about the why of it, we just know it happened. Nothing is really known before the big bang either. But I think this video does a good job in pointing out how science is pushing back the curtain of the unknown however slowly.
McGeeRF 1 year ago
@McGeeRF
"we just know it happened. Nothing is really known before the big bang either."
Poppycock that is.They have no idea, a big bang is only a educated guess not a scientific fact, your spewing hogwash.
Uaz31 1 year ago
@Uaz31 We know the Big Bang happened because of all the FACTUAL evidence which supports it. Microwave Background, expanding universe, known laws of physics.
Scientific theories are based on Facts, the word theory in science is not the same way it is used in the colloquial sense.
If its hogwash then dont watch the video's or learn anything about reality. Just stick your head in your book of fantasy and leave the rational logical critical thinking people alone.
We have the fossils we win.
McGeeRF 1 year ago
@McGeeRF we have the fossils, we win. I love it, ahah, and its true. They have a book...we have 100 years of evidence and facts that grows daily.
ajf1060 1 year ago
@Uaz31
Nice trolling man, nice trolling.
Razgrits 1 year ago
Tired of seeing these trolls commenting.
Seiku 1 year ago
@Seiku No kidding these kinds of people have eternity riding on it so your damn straight they are going to find ingenious ways to trick their selfs in to believing the rubbish that they spew. Think of it this way, even if you knew you were wrong you can not admit it because the chance of losing eternal life is much more severe then just being wrong. They've got eternity riding on their delusions. This is a BIG TICKET to give up for just intellictual integrity, reason, logic, and reality.
McGeeRF 1 year ago
the voice in the video is gay and annoying!
LukeJF89 1 year ago
i have short attention span
FuckJeffG0ldblum 1 year ago
so the big bang was a huge amount of energy wich became mass, wich expanded to create the un.... wait forget that it would have anihilated itself.
pato1996 1 year ago
yes we can 10¹⁰ TeV !!!!
Rapsoloko93 1 year ago
Cavitation in a liquid sphere demostrates how the big bang is possible. Gravity is probably the same princible as liquid dynamics. Our universe is a cavitated bubble within a body of some kind of density.
wiseyeffect 1 year ago