for any other people that are reading my comments about @MrFeelingsofly , im talking about a i7 2600k (not OC), GTX 580, ASUS MB, 16GB RAM and 1TB HD 7200rpm
@theboi808 it is more realistic, because FSX works in a way that it has a table of data for each aircraft (except good addons like PDMG), and its like that when the aircraft wieghs that much and is going at that speed, it will react in that way as the table says, where XPLANE 10 is worked off 3D geometry so (thats why its 60gb) when the aircraft wieghs that much and does that speed, the xplane thing simulates it in real world, also according to shape of plane, weather, and a load of shit
Guys i am building a new computer. Antec 1200 Full Tower ATX- Gigabyte Z68 Motherboard- Intel i7-2600k- will OC to 4.00 GHZ- Swiftech X20 H20 Extreme liquid cooling- ATX850W PSU- GTX 580 Hydro Copper 3GB- 8GB RAM- Kingston Hyper X 128GB SSD(boot)- Blue Cavier 1 TB HDD(data)- Asus 23" Led HD Moniter- HP DVD-RW Drive- Top Of The Line Wireless Card- Satiek Flight Controls- TrackIr5- I can't decide, i've been an fsx fan for years but Flight is a fail. Should i make thew switch, will it be good?
@MrFeelingsofly ey,i have the same computer exactly , without liquid cooling, inever needed it, with my good old fan which i have here ,i keep around 29 degrees celcius, otherwise i have x plane 10, and i can run it on medium settings, you wont expect much from that single GPU, and from one CPU because that shwat xplane really needs,to be able to may it, you shall need around one more of those gtx 580 and another i5 or a i7 580, i think its called. i have the GAINWARD GPU.
@MrFeelingsofly and im happy with it, im going to try out FSX now but the stupid thing is that FSX doesnt have that flight realism, i switch to xplane 9 from fs2004, which bcause xplane had those feeligns in the aircraft, if you get the PDMG and REX for FSX i think it could come close, its just there is still something t hat i like about x plane more. Just you need a strong computer, PM me and ill post up a video side by side comparison, of your type of specs (my computeR) Peace.
@MrFeelingsofly and 3GB is not needed unless u are running more then 1 monitor, even iddk 100%, i have 1.5GB and i think the OC u needa make sure its not gonna mess an<thing up, i dont over clock mine, and never will, and the SSD i find kinda useless :)
I'm sick of everyone complaining that their sim is better. I feel sorry for everyone who's ego is too big that they can't just sit down and enjoy both sims and what each one brings to the table...
X-plane 10 is to expensive and sucks ass. Flight simulator is the only real simulator out on the market for a true simmer and at a much cheaper price with thousands of addons avalible for it.
@bobac1083 FSX and FS9 is not better than xplane 10
Yes, it has lots of addons, of planes, of airports... but it isnt closed to reality, xplane 10 is very very closed to real flying dynamics, very good planes and very good airports
@havichin No its not. I actually have X-plane 9 and i also have a few friends who bought X-plane 10. They said its shit compaired to FS9 and FSX. And dude, learn how to type homo. Microsoft knows what they are doing. X-plane doesnt know at all. There is more realism in the flight simulator series and its been around for 2 years longer than x-plane. Tell me why most 3rd party devolopers out there wont devolop shit for X-plane... You are such a fucktard.
@bobac1083 Get your facts right before posting dumbass havichin. The only sim that looks better than FS9 and FSX is Aerofly. X-plane's aircraft are shit even if you do create them, and there isnt enoguh realism. ATC on the Microsoft Flight sim series is actually recorded in studio on site and not computer generated voices. So FUCK OFF you dumbass.
'FSX is for pc, x plane is for mac users. People have their own tastes'.
-----
I have X-plane on PC. So X-plane is not only for Mac.
I agree that people have their own tastes. I personally like FSX for its scenery and eye- candy extras, but I like X-Plane because it feels much more like flying a plane.
Yet I dont reckon X-plane's scenery or aircraft are as good as FSX ..or even Microsoft Flight.
X-Plane 10 looks great.... But I'm still a hardcore MSFSX User.... X-Plane 9 was not good at all...Missing VCs....
kvikaas 1 day ago
for any other people that are reading my comments about @MrFeelingsofly , im talking about a i7 2600k (not OC), GTX 580, ASUS MB, 16GB RAM and 1TB HD 7200rpm
Kovraus 5 days ago
You must have been very very light to have taken off so quickly
av8ist 1 week ago
but but but.... according to the x-plane description, it's more realistic than FSX. Im confused
theboi808 1 week ago
@theboi808 it is more realistic, because FSX works in a way that it has a table of data for each aircraft (except good addons like PDMG), and its like that when the aircraft wieghs that much and is going at that speed, it will react in that way as the table says, where XPLANE 10 is worked off 3D geometry so (thats why its 60gb) when the aircraft wieghs that much and does that speed, the xplane thing simulates it in real world, also according to shape of plane, weather, and a load of shit
Kovraus 5 days ago
On aersoft.com it has only 2 stars.?
MrFeelingsofly 1 week ago
MrFeelingsofly 1 week ago
@MrFeelingsofly ey,i have the same computer exactly , without liquid cooling, inever needed it, with my good old fan which i have here ,i keep around 29 degrees celcius, otherwise i have x plane 10, and i can run it on medium settings, you wont expect much from that single GPU, and from one CPU because that shwat xplane really needs,to be able to may it, you shall need around one more of those gtx 580 and another i5 or a i7 580, i think its called. i have the GAINWARD GPU.
Kovraus 5 days ago
@MrFeelingsofly and im happy with it, im going to try out FSX now but the stupid thing is that FSX doesnt have that flight realism, i switch to xplane 9 from fs2004, which bcause xplane had those feeligns in the aircraft, if you get the PDMG and REX for FSX i think it could come close, its just there is still something t hat i like about x plane more. Just you need a strong computer, PM me and ill post up a video side by side comparison, of your type of specs (my computeR) Peace.
Kovraus 5 days ago
@MrFeelingsofly and 3GB is not needed unless u are running more then 1 monitor, even iddk 100%, i have 1.5GB and i think the OC u needa make sure its not gonna mess an<thing up, i dont over clock mine, and never will, and the SSD i find kinda useless :)
Kovraus 5 days ago
@MrFeelingsofly i would also mabe reccomend the P8Z68-V LX (or PRO) motherboard, its much better
Kovraus 5 days ago
I think its a cabin view actually
ajepon5229 2 weeks ago
@ajepon5229 NO !! Its not
frank6023 1 week ago
Could someone tell me how to get the wing view? iv got x-plane 10 and when i look in view in the menu none of them are for this.
Precautionest 2 weeks ago
LAG!!
K3nnyize 2 weeks ago
I'm sick of everyone complaining that their sim is better. I feel sorry for everyone who's ego is too big that they can't just sit down and enjoy both sims and what each one brings to the table...
MrFumbles88 3 weeks ago 2
X-plane 10 is to expensive and sucks ass. Flight simulator is the only real simulator out on the market for a true simmer and at a much cheaper price with thousands of addons avalible for it.
bobac1083 1 month ago
@bobac1083 FSX and FS9 is not better than xplane 10
Yes, it has lots of addons, of planes, of airports... but it isnt closed to reality, xplane 10 is very very closed to real flying dynamics, very good planes and very good airports
havichin 1 month ago
@havichin No its not. I actually have X-plane 9 and i also have a few friends who bought X-plane 10. They said its shit compaired to FS9 and FSX. And dude, learn how to type homo. Microsoft knows what they are doing. X-plane doesnt know at all. There is more realism in the flight simulator series and its been around for 2 years longer than x-plane. Tell me why most 3rd party devolopers out there wont devolop shit for X-plane... You are such a fucktard.
bobac1083 1 month ago
@bobac1083 Get your facts right before posting dumbass havichin. The only sim that looks better than FS9 and FSX is Aerofly. X-plane's aircraft are shit even if you do create them, and there isnt enoguh realism. ATC on the Microsoft Flight sim series is actually recorded in studio on site and not computer generated voices. So FUCK OFF you dumbass.
bobac1083 1 month ago
@bobac1083 Just shut up no need to start a fight. FSX is for pc, x plane is for mac users. People have their own tastes.
DontBeNoobish 4 weeks ago
@DontBeNoobish and thats excactly why i hate X-plane so much. I hate Apple too. Over priced shit golore! So is X-plane 10!
bobac1083 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
Stoory 2 weeks ago
@DontBeNoobish wrote:
'FSX is for pc, x plane is for mac users. People have their own tastes'.
-----
I have X-plane on PC. So X-plane is not only for Mac.
I agree that people have their own tastes. I personally like FSX for its scenery and eye- candy extras, but I like X-Plane because it feels much more like flying a plane.
Yet I dont reckon X-plane's scenery or aircraft are as good as FSX ..or even Microsoft Flight.
I do love this new sim tho >
Search Youtube for AeroSoft FS"
Stoory 2 weeks ago
Is that the sound that comes with the aircraft or is it real world sounds? :P
kpf93 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@airport KSEA
mk3334 1 month ago
.0what airport are you at
airportcreator 1 month ago
awesome plane!
airportcreator 1 month ago