@LeFlaneur00 This a common reaction from believers, I assure you. I could very well make a video that explains this but you would disagree with it. I could very well say that I believe in leprechauns, who have just as much historical backing as God. How exactly do you know they don't exist? Precisely why the idea is called blind faith, its followers nothing but delusional, and its ideologies inane. I have cause to say there is no God because there is logical evidence to claim so. Where is yours?
@AlquimistEd I think the very same thing each time I see these type of comments or hear these statements. The basis to have a theory is generally mathematical. Meaning that it has some support of relevance in the physical world. If you are going to say that the multiverse is only a theory, condescendingly, what exactly is "god"? An entity that has absolutely no proof, data, or relevant information to verify its existence aside from quintessential blind faith.
@AlquimistEd Once again, no one is taking it as absolute truth sir.... That would be fairly hypocritical. I don't think you quite understand the concept of what a theory is in itself.. Theory has to be tested by the scientific method. This theory, in particular, is only one out of many. It does however have a substantial amount of mathematical evidence to support it. "God" does not even have number to support it. This being said, my point was to explain why someone would take none over some...
@Smific You said we came to the conclusion that there isn't only one universe that there is a multiverse, a conclusion requires proof, I don't see were the multiverse is any more possible than a lot of other theories that also have evidences to support it but not prove it. And I don't know why you think I'm discussing god, I don't follow any religion.
@AlquimistEd I'm aware. I'm also aware that you're not following this video very well. The topic was on subjects more logical than god. I mention "god" because that was the point of this video. Some thing(s) which are more relevant and logical than god.. After saying, multiple times, that I would not include myself entirely in something that does not have substantial evident proof, this should have been obvious. I don't believe you're credible enough to discuss the possibilities to be honest..
@Smific No.. I think you're not following my comment very well. I was merely pointing out that you assumed the multiverse as a conclusion to base your "theory" in, but that the existence of the multiverse has not been proven. You then tried to defend your point asking me what is exactly god then, wich would imply that you assumed(wrongly, againg) that I was defending "god", or any religion, as if that would make your argument any more believable.
@AlquimistEd This isnt my theory, firstly. I am not a mathematician and so generating such data would be impossible for me to conceive. You are taking a video in pieces and listening to what you want to hear. The point of this video was: "To show the illogical thought process that the concept of god is." I brought up one of hundreds of theories which all have fair amounts of merit above the "god" concept. This video is not attempting to prove this particular theory. It is conclusion in context.
Respond to this video... The "We have" is referencing myself and the viewers. If we had come to this conclusion, at least to my belief, the god debate would and should have been over. It is not, as you can see. So I ask my question again.. Was it not obvious while analyzing this video attempting to find error to complain about it that this context was and still is in place. The video is is current context. Not worldly.. Now again, watch the video and attempt to see that so you can cease this..
There are Archeological Proofs of Jesus and His Disciples actually exsisting...You are too analytical...It's good to think but try not over thinking.God Bless
@deathangelgrl You clearly did not watch my video. If you did, you would not be making such moronic claims. Regardless of that, "fear" is not to be felt by the Atheist. What do I have to fear? In your eyes, I am condemning myself to hell. In my eyes, I'm living a good life by enacting humanist principles and helping others. I don't care if I am condemned to hell in your eyes, which would be the ultimate fear for you and the only reason any Christian follows through with said faith to begin with.
@deathangelgrl You do realize that your ramblings and analogous theories mean absolutely nothing to me. Find me an instance in which a man grew back an entire limb through divinity and I will be impressed. People recover from cancer every day. Christopher Hitchens, an idol among atheism and literature, has suffer esophageal cancer and lives on to this day. Not one person has been cured of AIDS or HIV so that is a lie. And paralysis can be temporary as directed by the CNS..
@deathangelgrl Ive debated a priest. If he ran away, I'm sure you will as well. The very fact that you decided to quote "scientific proof" discourages me. I have no interest in speaking any longer. Thank you.
@TheNeonZBand Oh. Well I have no issue with anyone being a Christian as long as they are not hurting the rest of the world. Sadly that's what its boiled down to so now it has to be torn down. Religion is holding back society to a drastic extent. When people refute science because of it, example: the person below this conversation who had quoted 'Scientific proof'", there is a big BIG problem. The man that claims to see dead people will be locked away, but what of those who see an invisible god?
@Smific i understand what your saying, but I still wished no one cared about any belief. I want people to live and see what happens, right or wrong. Right?
@TheNeonZBand That would also involve not involving it in political matter. In many countries, the Evangelical church plays a role in the election.. Not to mention that it also suggests that a great leader is a Christian(in The United States). It's come to the point that it is a topic that you can not criticize. A topic that can literally get you into a physical confrontation. It is also keeping science from reaching a turning point in society. So should we choose a lack of intelligence?
@Smific is my point not getting understood? You need to not care about that stuff... just live, and see what happens in life, either way we are all wrong, yes?
@TheNeonZBand I understand your point. I am a Daoist Atheist.. I know what it means to let things live, however we have given this an excess of 2000 years. I thinks its about time to cut the BS and start working towards a brighter future. We could have allowed plagues to swallow all life as we know it, but instead we cured them. Imagine allowing life to be engulfed by Ebola. I live day by day living but I imagine life would be utterly boring without a purpose or something to work towards.
@Smific But do you realize that they will never listen to your point. Thus, your point is pointless. Just let everybody think for them selves.
(sorry this is some what off topic, but I'd like to talk to you about matters like this, dont worry im not the kind of person to tell you YOUR WRONG or anything, I just like to hear your opinion in voice. Do you perchance have a skype account? We could talk maybe. ^_^
@TheNeonZBand But they have been listening. Atheism has been on a massive rise since the 90s. In fact with the rate it is escalating, due to the brave people that do voice their opinions, it should be completely gone within the next century or so. My goal isnt to be heard. Its to extinguish what has been proven to be nothing but a poison for the benefit of my fellow man.. And I do but I generally don't speak to strangers over Skype. If you give me a basis on the subject matter, perhaps.
@TheNeonZBand I would happily do your interview type discussion, but beforehand I would appreciate it if I had the subject matter to ensure I know what I'm speaking of. I'm well studied however there are quite a bit more in percentage I do not know opposed to what I do. If you'd let me know the basis of the Q&A, I would gladly have the discussion on the same day with the exception of me being ignorant to the topic. I under most circumstances, listen, when lacking data in the topic discussed.
@TheNeonZBand My reason being besides, I am busy. I don't have time for debating Apologetics because in most situations, the discussion leads to very little. My position is the theory of Religion being a poison. Atheists typically always come out the victor in such debates. Ive seen this tactic employed in a whimsical and erratic amount of "discussions". Not that Apologists aren't worth speaking to, but I prefer direct and formal discussion.. The personality type speaks a lot about their lure..
I disagree with your opinion on "social networking debates" and them not being "fruitful" because the 'fruit' can be changing someones mind , or changing the way someone thinks.
Sorry , im only 40 seconds into ya vid , I will watch the rest now , lol .
@LogicalStatements1 I think that is more subjective to the topic of conversation. When it comes to religion, that is rarely converted even by a logical formal debate, the outcome is rarely on the oppositions side. The only conversion I have ever seen during religious debate has been during face to face conversation with socio-emotional insertions. Im sure when speaking of certain issues, yes you tube is sufficient. But generally, at least within this specific topic, it does not apply.
This has been flagged as spam show
this kid's drunk.
c16gregjockca 1 month ago
I don't know. Your next video should explain how my not knowing is proof of your belief.
LeFlaneur00 2 months ago
@LeFlaneur00 This a common reaction from believers, I assure you. I could very well make a video that explains this but you would disagree with it. I could very well say that I believe in leprechauns, who have just as much historical backing as God. How exactly do you know they don't exist? Precisely why the idea is called blind faith, its followers nothing but delusional, and its ideologies inane. I have cause to say there is no God because there is logical evidence to claim so. Where is yours?
Smific 2 months ago
Multiverse is not a conclusion, it's just another unproven theory.
AlquimistEd 3 months ago
@AlquimistEd I think the very same thing each time I see these type of comments or hear these statements. The basis to have a theory is generally mathematical. Meaning that it has some support of relevance in the physical world. If you are going to say that the multiverse is only a theory, condescendingly, what exactly is "god"? An entity that has absolutely no proof, data, or relevant information to verify its existence aside from quintessential blind faith.
Smific 3 months ago
@Smific ....It still is just a theory õ_o it hasn't been proven, so taking it as an absolute truth is a mistake.
AlquimistEd 3 months ago
@AlquimistEd Once again, no one is taking it as absolute truth sir.... That would be fairly hypocritical. I don't think you quite understand the concept of what a theory is in itself.. Theory has to be tested by the scientific method. This theory, in particular, is only one out of many. It does however have a substantial amount of mathematical evidence to support it. "God" does not even have number to support it. This being said, my point was to explain why someone would take none over some...
Smific 3 months ago
@Smific You said we came to the conclusion that there isn't only one universe that there is a multiverse, a conclusion requires proof, I don't see were the multiverse is any more possible than a lot of other theories that also have evidences to support it but not prove it. And I don't know why you think I'm discussing god, I don't follow any religion.
AlquimistEd 3 months ago
@AlquimistEd I'm aware. I'm also aware that you're not following this video very well. The topic was on subjects more logical than god. I mention "god" because that was the point of this video. Some thing(s) which are more relevant and logical than god.. After saying, multiple times, that I would not include myself entirely in something that does not have substantial evident proof, this should have been obvious. I don't believe you're credible enough to discuss the possibilities to be honest..
Smific 3 months ago
@Smific No.. I think you're not following my comment very well. I was merely pointing out that you assumed the multiverse as a conclusion to base your "theory" in, but that the existence of the multiverse has not been proven. You then tried to defend your point asking me what is exactly god then, wich would imply that you assumed(wrongly, againg) that I was defending "god", or any religion, as if that would make your argument any more believable.
AlquimistEd 3 months ago
@AlquimistEd This isnt my theory, firstly. I am not a mathematician and so generating such data would be impossible for me to conceive. You are taking a video in pieces and listening to what you want to hear. The point of this video was: "To show the illogical thought process that the concept of god is." I brought up one of hundreds of theories which all have fair amounts of merit above the "god" concept. This video is not attempting to prove this particular theory. It is conclusion in context.
Smific 3 months ago
Respond to this video... The "We have" is referencing myself and the viewers. If we had come to this conclusion, at least to my belief, the god debate would and should have been over. It is not, as you can see. So I ask my question again.. Was it not obvious while analyzing this video attempting to find error to complain about it that this context was and still is in place. The video is is current context. Not worldly.. Now again, watch the video and attempt to see that so you can cease this..
Smific 3 months ago
@Smific I am aware of what this video is about. I was simply pointing out a flaw in your "theory".
AlquimistEd 3 months ago
"Over thinking" only exists in the minds of the ignorant. The problem is people DO NOT THINK ENOUGH.
chuckwagon1645 4 months ago
@chuckwagon1645 Thank you, sir.
Smific 4 months ago
@Smific Im only 20 but your welcome anyway. hehe
chuckwagon1645 4 months ago
I find this well thought out. Even if I disagree with you(: Plus, you were easy to watch(:
AnnLove2388 5 months ago
There are Archeological Proofs of Jesus and His Disciples actually exsisting...You are too analytical...It's good to think but try not over thinking.God Bless
Sportsterfan68 5 months ago
@Sportsterfan68 No.. there is not. And I implore you to find it for me.
Smific 5 months ago
@Sportsterfan68 Actually there are NO "archeological proofs of jesus." None. If you think there is then what are they? Good luck.
sybite 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Sportsterfan68 Actually there are NO "archeological proofs of jesus." None. If you think there is then what are they? Good luck.
sybite 3 months ago
@deathangelgrl
There are no studies of healing-power what so ever, but placebo.
I have no proof that there isn´t a concious super-power (for example God)
but there´s plenty of proof that the bible is false. For example - the flood that
"drowned the world of sinners" never existed ause there are not the right traces of
sedimentary rock all over the continents proving the continents have been dry for
millions of years and.... yeah the bible says the world is 6000 years old.
Samzonish 6 months ago
@Samzonish Haha thank you for explaining that for me.. That girl is delusional.. Lmao healing.
Smific 4 months ago
@deathangelgrl You clearly did not watch my video. If you did, you would not be making such moronic claims. Regardless of that, "fear" is not to be felt by the Atheist. What do I have to fear? In your eyes, I am condemning myself to hell. In my eyes, I'm living a good life by enacting humanist principles and helping others. I don't care if I am condemned to hell in your eyes, which would be the ultimate fear for you and the only reason any Christian follows through with said faith to begin with.
Smific 6 months ago
@deathangelgrl You do realize that your ramblings and analogous theories mean absolutely nothing to me. Find me an instance in which a man grew back an entire limb through divinity and I will be impressed. People recover from cancer every day. Christopher Hitchens, an idol among atheism and literature, has suffer esophageal cancer and lives on to this day. Not one person has been cured of AIDS or HIV so that is a lie. And paralysis can be temporary as directed by the CNS..
Smific 6 months ago
@deathangelgrl Ive debated a priest. If he ran away, I'm sure you will as well. The very fact that you decided to quote "scientific proof" discourages me. I have no interest in speaking any longer. Thank you.
Smific 7 months ago
Absolutely preposterous! (man with mu stash) XD
TheNeonZBand 7 months ago
@TheNeonZBand Haha mu stash? What is a Mu stash lol?
Smific 7 months ago
@Smific it is the way the "internet" speaks. AKA anonymous, anon, trolls, meme bugs, etc...
so basically I'm the kind of person who wants everyone to live together without having to judge others based on what there opinions are.
TheNeonZBand 7 months ago
@TheNeonZBand Oh. Well I have no issue with anyone being a Christian as long as they are not hurting the rest of the world. Sadly that's what its boiled down to so now it has to be torn down. Religion is holding back society to a drastic extent. When people refute science because of it, example: the person below this conversation who had quoted 'Scientific proof'", there is a big BIG problem. The man that claims to see dead people will be locked away, but what of those who see an invisible god?
Smific 7 months ago
@Smific i understand what your saying, but I still wished no one cared about any belief. I want people to live and see what happens, right or wrong. Right?
TheNeonZBand 7 months ago
@TheNeonZBand That would also involve not involving it in political matter. In many countries, the Evangelical church plays a role in the election.. Not to mention that it also suggests that a great leader is a Christian(in The United States). It's come to the point that it is a topic that you can not criticize. A topic that can literally get you into a physical confrontation. It is also keeping science from reaching a turning point in society. So should we choose a lack of intelligence?
Smific 6 months ago
@Smific is my point not getting understood? You need to not care about that stuff... just live, and see what happens in life, either way we are all wrong, yes?
TheNeonZBand 6 months ago
@TheNeonZBand I understand your point. I am a Daoist Atheist.. I know what it means to let things live, however we have given this an excess of 2000 years. I thinks its about time to cut the BS and start working towards a brighter future. We could have allowed plagues to swallow all life as we know it, but instead we cured them. Imagine allowing life to be engulfed by Ebola. I live day by day living but I imagine life would be utterly boring without a purpose or something to work towards.
Smific 6 months ago
@Smific But do you realize that they will never listen to your point. Thus, your point is pointless. Just let everybody think for them selves.
(sorry this is some what off topic, but I'd like to talk to you about matters like this, dont worry im not the kind of person to tell you YOUR WRONG or anything, I just like to hear your opinion in voice. Do you perchance have a skype account? We could talk maybe. ^_^
TheNeonZBand 6 months ago
@TheNeonZBand But they have been listening. Atheism has been on a massive rise since the 90s. In fact with the rate it is escalating, due to the brave people that do voice their opinions, it should be completely gone within the next century or so. My goal isnt to be heard. Its to extinguish what has been proven to be nothing but a poison for the benefit of my fellow man.. And I do but I generally don't speak to strangers over Skype. If you give me a basis on the subject matter, perhaps.
Smific 6 months ago
@Smific i want to hear your opinion more, but in an almost Q&A.
TheNeonZBand 6 months ago
@TheNeonZBand I would happily do your interview type discussion, but beforehand I would appreciate it if I had the subject matter to ensure I know what I'm speaking of. I'm well studied however there are quite a bit more in percentage I do not know opposed to what I do. If you'd let me know the basis of the Q&A, I would gladly have the discussion on the same day with the exception of me being ignorant to the topic. I under most circumstances, listen, when lacking data in the topic discussed.
Smific 6 months ago
@TheNeonZBand My reason being besides, I am busy. I don't have time for debating Apologetics because in most situations, the discussion leads to very little. My position is the theory of Religion being a poison. Atheists typically always come out the victor in such debates. Ive seen this tactic employed in a whimsical and erratic amount of "discussions". Not that Apologists aren't worth speaking to, but I prefer direct and formal discussion.. The personality type speaks a lot about their lure..
Smific 6 months ago
I disagree with your opinion on "social networking debates" and them not being "fruitful" because the 'fruit' can be changing someones mind , or changing the way someone thinks.
Sorry , im only 40 seconds into ya vid , I will watch the rest now , lol .
LogicalStatements1 7 months ago
@LogicalStatements1 I think that is more subjective to the topic of conversation. When it comes to religion, that is rarely converted even by a logical formal debate, the outcome is rarely on the oppositions side. The only conversion I have ever seen during religious debate has been during face to face conversation with socio-emotional insertions. Im sure when speaking of certain issues, yes you tube is sufficient. But generally, at least within this specific topic, it does not apply.
Smific 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Smific do you accept?
TheNeonZBand 6 months ago
@LogicalStatements1 Oh and there is a part two. I apologize.
Smific 7 months ago