Although please consider this: using Mr. Stanton is a sure way to reduce any credibility you may have with the VERY few events out there that get good rigorous shake and still stand. I cannot bear any testimony by him after seeing how full of beans he has shown himself to be.
@cjsks He does claim to be an authority though. Sadly he seems to accept anything at face value without vetting what he receives, then parrots it as gospel. Many are quite taken in by his words because he is a physicist and should think twice.
This is probably maybe 1 of two or threee cases EVER that warrants serious research. The rest, including Rendelsham have been thoroughly and convincingly discredited. This however has several corroborating, independrent sources saying the same thing, radar, sattelite and noted equipment effects as well as sightings of the same object over several local countries. This case is whats worth basing your idea on that something indeed may be going on for real :D Read the wikipedia article. Bravo!
Or did she just learn to read and is taking it slow?
In any case, I'm glad they can over power us, when the do take over our planet and dispose of all the governments it will be a great move forward for humanity!
@planetfall Are you Sure it's just a story? Other youtube videos show an interview with one of the fighter pilots(!) The Defense Intelligence Agency certainly didnt think it was just a 'story' - they sent a report of this case to the National Security Agency and the White House - and the D.I.A say they interviewed the pilots. By the way - you think a muslim country's air force is going to release camera footage from a fighter plane?! Are you on drugs or what?!
I've seen a few. I specifically referred to such footage as "distincly clear footage of a clearly mechanical UFO."
There is no such footage on youtube or anywhere else. Those that have been released or obtained through FOIA have been very ambiguous, which is precisely why they were released to begin with. They are of low risk.
My point here is, as a result of the "top secret" classification the military has already admitted to, clear footage would undoubtedly be withheld.
And if there had been what in the hell makes you think such evidence would be made public? A January 31, 1949 FBI memo specifically stated that the matter of UFOs was considered Top Secret by intelligence officers of both the Army and Air Forces.
If there was distinctly clear gun camera footage of a clearly mechanical UFO -- it would never see the light of day.
A report of this incident was sent directly to the White House and DoD. Obviously of significance.
So the jet only got within 45 kms? Is that what they mean. Doesn't seem that close to get a real good look.
portantwas 4 months ago
Its a good thing he was not flying a fly-by-wire plane
littleneddygoestowar 1 year ago
@gyromancy2 Maybe because you ill?
mcwolfus 1 year ago
This is the most credible sighting I have read or heard about. Wikipedia has a lot of interesting detail on the case.
cjsks 1 year ago
Although please consider this: using Mr. Stanton is a sure way to reduce any credibility you may have with the VERY few events out there that get good rigorous shake and still stand. I cannot bear any testimony by him after seeing how full of beans he has shown himself to be.
shkotay 1 year ago
@shkotay: Why does this matter? He isn't claiming to be a witness...
cjsks 1 year ago
@cjsks He does claim to be an authority though. Sadly he seems to accept anything at face value without vetting what he receives, then parrots it as gospel. Many are quite taken in by his words because he is a physicist and should think twice.
shkotay 1 year ago
This is probably maybe 1 of two or threee cases EVER that warrants serious research. The rest, including Rendelsham have been thoroughly and convincingly discredited. This however has several corroborating, independrent sources saying the same thing, radar, sattelite and noted equipment effects as well as sightings of the same object over several local countries. This case is whats worth basing your idea on that something indeed may be going on for real :D Read the wikipedia article. Bravo!
shkotay 1 year ago
Question: wut if we can prove aliens are vistiting our world, wut the hell are we gonna do about? We can't fight them, as best as I can tell.
hulkmeister23 2 years ago
@hulkmeister23 Why fight at all.
If they wanted us dead they'd simply drop big rocks into our oceans until we wrere no longer a problem.
The fact that they haven't done this is encouraging and probably means we don't have anything to worry about.
jimmywrangles 1 year ago
The narrator is on some sort of depressant?
Or did she just learn to read and is taking it slow?
In any case, I'm glad they can over power us, when the do take over our planet and dispose of all the governments it will be a great move forward for humanity!
RobertBarto 2 years ago 2
@RobertBarto I will gather some extra wood and bring it to you as a present when we are free, just for saying that today and cheering me up. : )
phnixlady 2 years ago
@RobertBarto I agree. I have no idea why she reads so bloody slowly and with such a flat inflection. It makes a great event somewhat dreary lol!
shkotay 1 year ago
@shkotay It's her accent. I've heard actors with it before who have the same pace and inflection. Not the nicest in the whole world ;0)
portantwas 4 months ago
Nicely done but lose the narrator.
jcislo 2 years ago 2
Or change that crappy voice.
LessthanJake14 2 years ago
not controls, just readings like altitude, bearing, etc.
pdderek 2 years ago
thats it? thats the best evidence? another story? what utter rubbish. where is the camera footage from these alleged encounters? ridiculous.
planetfall 2 years ago
i think it has more to do with the redibility of the witnesses
cuzimaluzer77 2 years ago
@planetfall Are you Sure it's just a story? Other youtube videos show an interview with one of the fighter pilots(!) The Defense Intelligence Agency certainly didnt think it was just a 'story' - they sent a report of this case to the National Security Agency and the White House - and the D.I.A say they interviewed the pilots. By the way - you think a muslim country's air force is going to release camera footage from a fighter plane?! Are you on drugs or what?!
yastunt 1 year ago
I've seen a few. I specifically referred to such footage as "distincly clear footage of a clearly mechanical UFO."
There is no such footage on youtube or anywhere else. Those that have been released or obtained through FOIA have been very ambiguous, which is precisely why they were released to begin with. They are of low risk.
My point here is, as a result of the "top secret" classification the military has already admitted to, clear footage would undoubtedly be withheld.
ProphecyGuru 3 years ago
And if there had been what in the hell makes you think such evidence would be made public? A January 31, 1949 FBI memo specifically stated that the matter of UFOs was considered Top Secret by intelligence officers of both the Army and Air Forces.
If there was distinctly clear gun camera footage of a clearly mechanical UFO -- it would never see the light of day.
A report of this incident was sent directly to the White House and DoD. Obviously of significance.
ProphecyGuru 3 years ago
to soft of a voice, it makes me want to smash things
MetalManDan7 3 years ago
Thanks! It's a great case.
redstarfilms 4 years ago 2
Good video. 5 Stars
Lindasufos 4 years ago