Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
She sounds so unimpressed with the pencil example ;)
Pythagoras211 1 month ago
Through my experience, it's more informal & substantial reading about the socratic method, rather than watching videos.
bossscrillaguy 3 months ago
"there are more questions than answers , the more I find out the less I know"
VIV292 7 months ago
she's hot
izaak791 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No way out man Russian women ** leefoxnow.info **
nshudayangani1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Discovered in the 21stC: The Underlying Law of Nature.
The underlying law of nature may be the world's most useful, profitable and encouraging knowledge.
The top 3 General Characteristics of The underlying law of nature are:
#1. The Way of All Things
#2. The Basis of All Laws and Principles
#3. The Basis of All Health, Growth, Efficacy and Efficiency
Google it – as a start.
The empirical process for identifying the underlying law of nature was discovered in 2008.
Soon we may all do so.
TedDGPoulos 1 year ago
Hot chick says "That made a'lot of sense" . If the girl understood the socratic method, she would have concluded by asking another question. There is no end point or final answer in the socratic method. Just more questions. Like, "what is a number represent"? or "what are the implications of adding?" The guy explaining doesn't seem to get it either. He is only fishing for answers that the girl already has. This is dreadful. Completely opposite of socratic questioning.
qigong1001 1 year ago
There is a tribe in South America that have no number above 2,so to them this question would be pointless.
pickofthepatch 2 years ago
Yes.
aboutourself 2 years ago
@pickofthepatch computers only recognize two numbers...its called binary. or a binary number system...the only difference than ours is that they start over to the next column of numbers at 3. we dont start a new column until 10...but it is incorrect to think that they only can count to 2 and then cant understand anything beyond that. for them 1 is the same as our 1. 2 is the same as our 2, but then they start a column with 11 which is our 3... 12 = 4 ... 21 = 5 ...22 = 6 and so on
slovakmath 1 year ago
tanks a lot i have a homework and the video its very helpful
dracoadn 2 years ago
No is doesn't make any sense. If you couldn't count you wouldn't know to say two then four pencils
KiaOra53 2 years ago
Yes. If you couldn't count.
aboutourself 2 years ago
@aboutourself he never said you couldn't count!
marlonakafuck 1 year ago
@aboutourself Who was the speaker?
Icemario87 1 year ago
@Icemario87 The speaker's name is Ravi Arapurakal
aboutourself 1 year ago
@Icemario87 One's name is Ravi Arapurakal
aboutourself 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KiaOra53 "No is doesn't make any sense. If you couldn't count you wouldn't know to say two then four pencils"
Wrong. You would have to say (the equivalent of) "two sets of two pencils, one set of two per hand" and if it were six pencils they might say "two sets of two pencils plus one set of two pencils."
Tedious, inefficient even, but not impossible.
Icemario87 1 year ago