whoever do not believe in JESUS after all HE had done for us is a real NUMB...
JESUS was hated, batrayed and abbandoned... HE suffered and died... HE offered HIS life freely for us to have faith in HIM and for us to have forgiveness and Life....
they chose to free a murderer just to crucify JESUS...
JESUS died to save us from the sins inside of our flesh...
HE expressed HIS love for us through HIS death...
for
whoever believes in JESUS shall not perish but will have Eternal Life
Learning astronomy opens and expands your mind. It tunes your thoughts in ways that allow bigger ideas to pop into your head, ideas that wouldn't have had a place before, can now nest in your brain and incubate, possibly becoming life changing, world-improving actions.
Life on this earth is far to intricate and complicated to just be an accident. I don"t know what or who, I just know there is a higher power. If we have the mental capacity to question the creator then there must be a creator.
cow lovers AKA Taurus that age ended 1658BC then the age of Aries 1658BC through 498 AD now the age of Pisces 498AD 2654 AD so you are 3600 plus years out of time what went wrong?
wonder if ever we will have some probe that will travel the speed of light.. otherwise were going nowhere.. its like a snail on a motorway trying to get to a point that's 1000 miles away.. i hope in my life time man discovers life on other planets as i believe our universe is teeming with life.. thank you..
Tummy #3....cuz they want to stop or just want to drivel, babble and use big words to explain their way out of the possibility of a God. Why don't u take a look at the obvious evidence for the God of the Bible? There information in there the couldn't have been possibly known to the writers which we've only discovered of late.Jonah 2:6 talks about mountains at ocean bottom. We didn't know that til w/in last 100 years. We though 200 years ago there were 6,000 stars. The OT said they innumerable.
Let me just start off by saying that you are very ignorant of science.
God is not a logical explanation for the beginning of the Universe because he is presumably more complex than the question he is designed to answer.
Evolution has not been debunked my friend. You have been reading all the wrong books.
To Tummy #2: all theories stop at the beginning (scientists say "big bang" but won't look further; some say we came from aliens but won't say where aliens came from)...we always get to a point where life/the universe is beyond natural explanation and the ONLY logical explanation is a supernatural one beyond our understanding and finite minds. So, it's not "magical" or fanstasy to believe in a creator. Darwinism is more miraculous than the logic of a supernatural creator. Darwinists are cowards
You are stupid and I hate you. We can't look any further than the big bag becuase there was laiterally nothing to look at, there was no space, there was no time. And no, we don't get to a point where the universe is beyond natural explination. And even if there was, whats to say that it was your god that made it? Also, Darwinism and eveolution do not explain the origin of lfe or the universe, only the origin of species. Creationits are blind fools terrified of death.
I would say that the Atheist Darwinists are terrified of being accountable to a Creator...
Have you heard of "The Great Wager" by Blaise Pascal?
"If my faith commitment to what I believe to be true is erroneous, and there is no God and the Bible is false, I will never know it. When I die, all consciousness will cease to exist. On the other hand, if your atheism proves false, you will know it!"
@SpiderShaman3323 Hey look who's ignorant now creationists and overall christians are not terrified of death. I know that God created me and because I believe in him I'm going to heaven... I am far from terrified of death
@Exo64 You missed the whole point of my argument and only served to compound it. You have convinced yourself that there is a Heaven that you will go to when you die so that you can be unafraid, take away that delusion and you are terrified of death.
@SpiderShaman3323 ok Here's how i see it and i don't really care what you have to say about it. I know there is a heaven, you are the one who has convinced himself that there isn't, I am going to heaven so I'm not afraid of death, and because you don't believe that then you are the one who should be afraid of death.
@Exo64 I am scared of death in the same way most people are, beyond that I'm not so terrified that I have to make up an invisible man in the sky that will make me live forever. I was dead for billions of years before I was born, I can't complain about returning to the painless nothingness. As a sidenote, Eternal life would be the worst torture I can think of. Sure the first few millenia would be awesome, but what about all the ones after that for an infinite amount of time?
@SpiderShaman3323 If i were to die and go to nothingness that would be fine, but why do that when you could live in perfection and paradise forever its not like living forever on earth. and if I were to return to nothingness after death then why would anyone be so scared as to make a God to turn to.
Don't know what the opening and closing statements have anything to do with the content.....so this guy learned this information from someone else...That makes him an expert on what exists in the afterlife? Or because he knows a couple facts he's proven God don't exist? This just shows how grande God is. In fact the Darwin quote is innacurate as scientist are rethinking gravity....the more we learn the more we realize how much we don't know. This dude is clinging to outdated Darwin theories!
You say that the theory of darwinian natural selection is outdated? The idea of magical gods have been with us for hundreds of thousands of years. Which one is outdated here?
Oh ya! Wow, deep insight dude! Way to go! You say belief in gods has been around so long that that makes it outdated good one--whatever, dummy. Darwinism is outdated because of the science we have that has basically proven evolution to be impossible. Darwin said himself that if life is more complex beyond the cell then my theory is no good. Even Pasteur did some experiments that proved that life can only come from life, unlike Darwin's theory. MOREOVER, Darwin, like other theories STOP near
So, the physical universe was created by ... something... there is intelligent design ... too much order in the universe to have just ... materialized that way...
And ... too much to us to have just materialized this way ... even if they are trying to explain it through evolution...
@radiospirit Pascals Wager is the most retarded argument for the existence of god. What if you're wrong for being a christian, and instead should be hindu? Avoiding the hell of one god condemns you the hell of another. When you realise why you reject every other god you will understand why I reject yours.
@radiospirit We offer knowledge and truth, and we actually deliver. And its not about what we offer, its about what is true and what is not. I'd also wager that I know more about Hinduism than you do, considering I'm Indian.
@radiospirit That isnt the point you moron, the point is that Pascals Wager is a useless tool for debating for any gods existence. Just because you've chosen a god doesn't mean you have chosen the right one.
I'm not a Hindu, being Indian doesn't automatically make me one. And for once you're right, Pascal's Wager doesn't argue the point for a specific creator, it argues that being a member of a religion is a safer bet than being an Atheist. This is a completely retarded point to argue from as your religion is has no greater chance of being right as anyother. So how likely do you think it is that the religion you have chosen is the right one out of a mountain of existing ones and others yet to be.
Holy crap, it doesn't matter what two religions you compare the point is that Pascal's Wager is completely useless just like your religion and all the other ones. Take your mind poison somewhere else.
more stars than there are grains of sand on this planet? hmm not convinced on that one.. unless someone wants to count them all.... be sure to post a vid!
In 1962, MIT, did count the grains of sand in a table spoon. And from there they did just multiply the table spoons into a square foot box. and then so on and so on. They calculated this with an average of 300 billion stars per normal Galaxy, (however, they are galaxies 10 fold of this). Impossible as it sounds my friend, they are right. There are more stars out there than sands on beaches. Our tech. counts around 200 billion Galaxies, there could be trillions outthere, we just dont know
Consider the randomness of evolution. Take a handful of scrabble letters, two handfuls if you want. See how many tries it takes to come up with this simple line of Shakespear:"To be or not to be." Remember, you cannot intelligently pull aside the word 'be' or 'to' because that would be an intelligent being creating a word and we want to see what randomness can do. When you tire of this experiment, consider how many intermediate forms must have nonbeneficial mutations if random is the rule.
Um...that paper folding thing...is dont think its true. I think its is that when we fold a piece of paper (the usual A4 size paper), it becomes very strong around this fold #, but come on, there are mechanical presses that can squish steel flat, and you're telling me its physically impossible to bend a bunch of plant fibers?
@01:32 "if you fold a piece of paper in half 44 times it will reach the moon" ... WTF! Nonsense, i dare say its impossable to fold an a sheet of paper in half 44 times, not thatt im willing to check it out, and it defo won't get to the moon.. Please enlighten me if ive missed something
if 1 side of paper is roughly 1/32 in thick, double that (1fold) would make it 1/16, then 1/8,1/4,1/2 then 1 inch, after 5 folds, 2in,4in,8in,16in,32in. 10 folds. it is 2feet and 8in. thick 64, 128, 256, 512,1025,2048, 4096,8192,16384 and 32,768in after 20 folds it is 2,730 feet thick. skipping, ahead. on the 44th fold the paper is 549,755,813,888 inches thick, that's 45,812,984,490.2/3 feet div. that by 5280 and it equals 8,676,701.6/11 miles. the moon is only 252,687 miles away
yes amazing maths. but the fact remains you can not fold a peice of paper in half 44 times. it is physicaly impossable, try it... Its a stupid hypothesis..sorry.. you can only fold a peice of paper in half 7 mb 8 times... so the paper would meed to be 50km thick (approx) if it was ever to be possable for a peice of paper to be folded in half and reach the moom. Now the physics would change for a peice of paper that big, and who could fold that anyway even if it could be.
no shit you retard. the video uses that as a way to visually understand the distance. why do you tell me impossible to fold the paper, then throw out the 50km idea? i was simply explaining it to other viewers. read my previous comment saying something like "if you fold the paper (in half) 44 times, it would have doubled enough to make it to the moon, since we cannot fold it 44 times, its called an assumption and the paper would not actually leave the earth, learn to read dumbshit.
ok, im a retard.... all im saying is its a dumb assumption based on as impossability.. now, if you use an example that in not based in reality, how do you thinks on other facts and info in the video, it discredits them.. If something me i always check the info and research further, when i see a vid or article has some dubious info then obviously it become hard to trust the info.. you get what i mean...
Really i was just saying its impossable.. no need to throw insults around
great vid except that some of yr 'facts' aren't!---and the closing quote owes more to an inbred elites self-justification than to the nature of the universe
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
i don't think jupiter is a gas giant--i think it is solid like earth..also, the sun isn't a nuclear reactor but electromagnetic; the moon is an artificial satellite towed here around 30,000 years ago i expect
thanks to me--i comment on everything! the 'artificial' moon is really nothing of the kind!! infact it's made of an element called greencheese; discovered many centuries ago, by A.N. Olde Houswiff--and suppressed by NASA
they enjoy it (thoroughly); specially about all those satellites they're twatting about with up there...designed to track/programme us devolved microchipped serfs! born liars---it's a prerequisite for working there
but jesus walk on the water is a big deal. the only petty miracle your god can perform?? changing water to wine and some manna from heavan. did your god told how to create laptop??
@paparali really? first of all I think that making enough food to feed a whole nation is at least on the same level as laptop if not greater and secondly the God who created us gave the laptop's inventor the mental skill to create such a great device so there ya go
it took 13years 13 jurers 13mins to finaly do justice to OJ simpson lol hope my maths is right. i cant seem to work out that if the sun is 93million miles away how does earth travel only 1.5 million miles per day to get round the sun?????????
ok thanks i want paying attention! what does he mean when hwe says a folded A4 sheet 44 times it will reach the moon. may be if you fired it from a rocket launcher it would survive the eliments! may be if it was possible to fold it that many times longways say its 11 inches long folded 5 times and each fold doubles the amount of creases 5 folds gets you 32x11 inches i take it that 10 folds gets more than 64 right? wtf?
if you fold the paper (in half) 44 times, it would have doubled enough to make it (distance) to the moon, since we cannot fold it 44 times, its called an assumption and the paper would not actually leave the earth, more of a "if you did this, this would happen"
but most don't die because of religion, they die from starvation, disease and poor living conditions. Even if religious wars ended, they would still be dying.
If you (hypothetically) fold a paper 44 times, you double the thickness 44 times. (i.e. fold a 0.1 mm paper 4 times, it becomes respectively 0.2->0.4->0.8->1.6 mm thick.
folding is 'times 2' we double 4 times so the thickness increases 2^4 = 16 times (0.1x16=1.6mm)
If we fold 44 times, it increases 2^44=17592186044416 times.
17592186044416 x 0.1 mm is 1759218604441.6 mm
that's 1,759,218 kilometers. Actual distance to the moon = 384,403 KM ;)
I Agree with PrometheansFiree, We need to stop all this violence because it is destroying our species! If i could i would lead a project to colonize mars
i like this video, but on the side you should look up hawkings other quote on how in his study of black holes, he is starting to find that a creator must exist.
If you fold a sheet at the middle 44 times you get 17,500,000,000,000 very tiny "sheets" of paper. I.e. it's the same as stacking 17,500,000,000,000 sheets of paper.
You previous post is completely wrong. You don't have to know math to know that. It's enough to know that two sheets on top of each other are not thinner than one sheet.
What an amazing video indartims !!! Great job!! I love the song whats the title and from what artist ?? Seeing how vast is the universe makes you think twice that we are not alone out there. And if we are alone... well seems to me like an awfull waste of space !! don't you think ??? Thanks for video amazing work my friend !!!
We all must learn something. Germany produced Einstein, and Josef Mengele. The first one used his knowledge to do good things, the second were called Doctor Death. As we can see, people can use science and religion( not God), to hide their real intention. Keep not trusting in men words. Look around you and you will discover many hidden things that just the humble of heart can see. Keep your kindness and you will discover an excellent way.Auf wiedersehen mein bruder!!
When you fold the paper once, you double the thickness, the fold again it's four times, the third fold is 8 and so on. Paper thickness x 2x2x2x2...x2x2 (repeated 44 times) = the distance to the moon, I assume. Give it a try and see if it works. I couldn't get past 7 folds. I guess I won't be going to the moon anytime soon
8 planets in out solar system, (and just say that every star has 8 planets). 250 billion stars and 100 billion galaxies. which means that there is approximatley 200,000,000,000,000 planets. the chances of life elsewhere is pretty high if not certain
Even largest of numbers are not so large, when on Astronomical scale; smallest fraction is not small enough, when we consider Planck Time 5.39x10^-44 second.
While 2x10^14 is a big number (can bigger, factoring dark matter, parallel universes et al) yet we do not expect number of planets with life commensurate to this scale; hence big numbers cannot be a determinant rationale.
well i no that scientists are only estimating these numbers, but i cant see that there are all these stars and galaxies, and yet we are the only planet with life on it
It is certainly likely that there is life elsewhere. There is not indication, let alone an evidence so far. We need to rely on evidence rather than intuition.
Besides, lacking any empirical evidence or even a credible scientific theory predicting life elsewhere, numbers, howsoever big, has little significance.
Much as we cannot rule out existence of life elsewhere, lacking any empirical evidence & theoretical prediction, this is an issue only in exploratory domain. Logically, Negative evidence in terms of non-existence is not expected in speculative domain.
Based on telescopic observations, a century back many were certain of intelligent life on Mars.
When we can believe everything we hear about the universe, it is a FACT that there is life on other planets. Although it is in our knowledge the smallest lifeforms possible that can survive in outer space, on meteors and comets. Isn't this enough proof that there is life on other planets? Intelligent life is another subject but that's just a matter of time isn't it?
We do not believe everything we hear about the Universe. It is necessary to have a positive confirmation of existence of life, rather than a negative evidence of non-existence. This is what scientific empirical evidence is about.
It will be exciting to get confirmation about evidence of life elsewhere; intelligent life will be awesome.
You think the purpose of the ever expanding universe is love? How can you back that? btw, no modern scientist "agrees with everything Darwin thought".
The diference between the science and faith is that, the first one, can change everytime, and mankind says that it is evolution.We need more faith to believe in scientific data.
And alot more to believe in magic. Once you have EVIDENCE for something, it takes 0, I repeat, 0 faith to believe in it. Scientific research and data is what? That evidence.
Unlike religious folks, I don't care what another man has to say. Because he's just a what? A man. I listen to what evidence have to say, not scientist either. I'm an agnostic. I'm willing to take heed in "God" have to say as long as he provides me with evidence of his own existance. By the way, who's God would I be led to in time. The Greek Gods? The Hindu Gods? The Chinese God? To whom? Catch ya' later. I'm going out now. I wanna discuss this.
I is not just a matter of liking or not. But everything about life . We cannot say : I don't like, so I will not discuss. About prove something, the human being Cannot prove anything. We not even discover the cure of influenza virus. . But the thing that we cannot prove don't mean that don't exists.Evidence? . Hitler proved with evidences that white was superior. Catholic church used the evidences to put fire in human beings.Many evidences are produced by men.
I have alot of grammatical errors in my prior responce, I'm sorry. Now, what's all this like or dislike business? I said I wanna discuss this. It's not a problem. Never heard of "influenza virus", but hey, eventually we'll find a cure IN TIME. Why are you all always in a hurry? Macro-evo. takes TIME too. Hilter and Catholics? I said it before. I don't what MAN have to say. Provide physical and scientific evidence.
As for Hilter's "evidence", I'm black but I won't turn this into a race game. He was a great leader. Look at what he's done. He was also partially demented. He was also influenced by psuedo science and propaganda. And yes, whites do tend to progresss while my people sit back and do nothing except alot of bullshit. Then cry this "white oppression" propaganda as an excuss to remain doing nothing. Hilter is probably right. He meant German white though, not the rustics of America.
I dont know if he was smart or germans were stupid. He said that superior was: Blond hair, German, and blue eyes. He had brown eyes, brown hair and was foreigner, and convinced Germans to hate other people.
I have Russian Italian and German blood. But when I am bleeding the color is the same of my Black friends. Believe me: Today the pseudo science rules the world.I liked your way, because you don't make yourself a victim. It is a great step.
I doubt the Germans were stupid. They were ages ahead in the fields of science and are still the most extraordinary engineers of the world. Back in WW II their foes were ONLY superior in numbers, alliances and resources. Germany produces some of the most brillant scientist ever and still do. They were lost once because an ingenius leader led them from reality with his vision. They are still our brothers. Thanks for the compliment man. I'm only 17 don't get me wrong. I have much to learn still.
That's a stupid assumption i think. Because if the universe would be infinite, there would exsist worlds so absurd, simply impossible. Why? Absurdity is impossible.
I'd say that is a stupid assumption. Simply because nothing can be infinite. If the universe was to be infinite, such strange and absurd worlds would exsist, which is not possible. An infinite amount of space, means an infinite amount of objects and things.
Has anyone established that the Universe is finite (or otherwise)?
Quantum statistics in particular & mechanics in general, to begin with appears absurd, destabilizes our belief in (Scientific) Determinism etc but experiments after experiment prove it. Quotes of Einstein on Quantum Uncertainty will bring out this point.
I actually don't believe Quantum is uncertain. There has to be some logic in it, even though it's even smaller then what we know now.
But still the simple formula tells us it's almost (like 99,999999999999%) impossible that the universe is infinite:
Infinite amound of space = Infinite amount of objects = Infinite amound of possibilities. Are you suggesting somewhere in the universe Elvis is still alive?
The topic covered is my favourite but there isnt anything in form of some message or proof, it is a mere compilation of facts. It is also not a movie but pps converted to movie. The music didnt make any sense, yet it is worth watching. Darwin's original theory has been modified for betterment, but in principle it stands tall & firm.
I disagree with Darwin I believe that there is some form of design in the Universe though to waht pupose it is desdigned has not fully been revealed yet.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Darwins an idiot. Any non-God believing scientist can tell you that the universe is deeply designed in complexity. Darwin hated God and even referred to himself, in his memoirs, as a pastor of Satan. After his 10 year old daughter died, he turned his life to trying to explain away God.
"Any non-God believing scientist can tell you that the universe is deeply designed in complexity" How does that make Darwin an idiot? what are you taking about ? :S
Dont abuse Darwin & get personal quoting an personal life event; just talk about Evolution. Continue to oppose Evolution, profess Flat Earth, persecute Galileo, believe earth is 6000 years old ... please be so kind to do so on facts & logic. Most scientist agree that Darwin changed the scientific world more than Einstein & Planck did.
If there is not such thing as religion I wonder what would one say or think
U can think feel n touch n some pple say it's an illusion. Knock his head c if it's an illusion
candymagic68 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"if you fold a piece of A4 paper in half 44 times it will reach the moon" Can someone explain this?
TheLood 6 months ago
Words are flying out like
Endless rain into a paper cup
They slither while they pass
They slip away across the universe
Pools of sorrow waves of joy
Are drifting through my open mind
Possessing me and caressing me
Jai guru deva om :D
acdc14terrace 8 months ago
"if you fold a piece of A4 paper in half 44 times it will reach the moon"
What's that supposed to mean?
Aggi93 9 months ago
darwin sounds bitter
yogurtbeard 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"There is an unbounded main
Of thought, beyond our wildest dream,
Through which arrives in every brain,
Imbued with ego, a tiny stream."
Check out my channel for a powerful film on Science and Spirituality, based on Gopi Krishna's last book, The Way to Self-Knowledge. Thanks.
DrMickaelleDougherty 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"There is an unbounded main
Of thought, beyond our wildest dream,
Through which arrives in every brain,
Imbued with ego, a tiny stream."
Check out my channel for a powerful film on Science and Spirituality, based on Gopi Krishna's last book, The Way to Self-Knowledge. Thanks.
DrMickaelleDougherty 1 year ago
no one dares to die just fool many people...
no one dares to die for a lie..
no one dares to die, to suffer, to be tortured without mercy, to be hated, betrayed and abbandoned just for us..
no one
no one
except JESUS
JESUS died to save us...
miguel65469 1 year ago
whoever do not believe in JESUS after all HE had done for us is a real NUMB...
JESUS was hated, batrayed and abbandoned... HE suffered and died... HE offered HIS life freely for us to have faith in HIM and for us to have forgiveness and Life....
they chose to free a murderer just to crucify JESUS...
JESUS died to save us from the sins inside of our flesh...
HE expressed HIS love for us through HIS death...
for
whoever believes in JESUS shall not perish but will have Eternal Life
miguel65469 1 year ago
Google Doe’s Account.
firefloat22 1 year ago
Learning astronomy opens and expands your mind. It tunes your thoughts in ways that allow bigger ideas to pop into your head, ideas that wouldn't have had a place before, can now nest in your brain and incubate, possibly becoming life changing, world-improving actions.
Donatello2030 1 year ago
umm you idiot no way if you fold an a4 piece of paper in half 44 times will it heck reach the moon duh!
joshua9able 1 year ago
Life on this earth is far to intricate and complicated to just be an accident. I don"t know what or who, I just know there is a higher power. If we have the mental capacity to question the creator then there must be a creator.
SIzemore3434 1 year ago
cow lovers AKA Taurus that age ended 1658BC then the age of Aries 1658BC through 498 AD now the age of Pisces 498AD 2654 AD so you are 3600 plus years out of time what went wrong?
simplemindbelive 2 years ago
i worship cows the best part is T bone
simplemindbelive 2 years ago
wonder if ever we will have some probe that will travel the speed of light.. otherwise were going nowhere.. its like a snail on a motorway trying to get to a point that's 1000 miles away.. i hope in my life time man discovers life on other planets as i believe our universe is teeming with life.. thank you..
fairhillnorrie 2 years ago
what is the vid talking about when it says paper being folded in half 44 times will reach the moon?
SamUKest89 2 years ago
Post a web page U fuking jackass. This is not a video. It's text.
Get a life. FLAGGED!
Deathrape2001 2 years ago
What's in a name? God is the Creator.
The Ω
TheOmegaProphecies 2 years ago
Tummy #3....cuz they want to stop or just want to drivel, babble and use big words to explain their way out of the possibility of a God. Why don't u take a look at the obvious evidence for the God of the Bible? There information in there the couldn't have been possibly known to the writers which we've only discovered of late.Jonah 2:6 talks about mountains at ocean bottom. We didn't know that til w/in last 100 years. We though 200 years ago there were 6,000 stars. The OT said they innumerable.
chillincochillin 2 years ago
Let me just start off by saying that you are very ignorant of science.
God is not a logical explanation for the beginning of the Universe because he is presumably more complex than the question he is designed to answer.
Evolution has not been debunked my friend. You have been reading all the wrong books.
TummyTush 2 years ago 3
To Tummy #2: all theories stop at the beginning (scientists say "big bang" but won't look further; some say we came from aliens but won't say where aliens came from)...we always get to a point where life/the universe is beyond natural explanation and the ONLY logical explanation is a supernatural one beyond our understanding and finite minds. So, it's not "magical" or fanstasy to believe in a creator. Darwinism is more miraculous than the logic of a supernatural creator. Darwinists are cowards
chillincochillin 2 years ago
You are stupid and I hate you. We can't look any further than the big bag becuase there was laiterally nothing to look at, there was no space, there was no time. And no, we don't get to a point where the universe is beyond natural explination. And even if there was, whats to say that it was your god that made it? Also, Darwinism and eveolution do not explain the origin of lfe or the universe, only the origin of species. Creationits are blind fools terrified of death.
SpiderShaman3323 2 years ago
I would say that the Atheist Darwinists are terrified of being accountable to a Creator...
Have you heard of "The Great Wager" by Blaise Pascal?
"If my faith commitment to what I believe to be true is erroneous, and there is no God and the Bible is false, I will never know it. When I die, all consciousness will cease to exist. On the other hand, if your atheism proves false, you will know it!"
radiospirit 2 years ago
@SpiderShaman3323 Hey look who's ignorant now creationists and overall christians are not terrified of death. I know that God created me and because I believe in him I'm going to heaven... I am far from terrified of death
Exo64 1 year ago
@Exo64 You missed the whole point of my argument and only served to compound it. You have convinced yourself that there is a Heaven that you will go to when you die so that you can be unafraid, take away that delusion and you are terrified of death.
SpiderShaman3323 1 year ago
@SpiderShaman3323 ok Here's how i see it and i don't really care what you have to say about it. I know there is a heaven, you are the one who has convinced himself that there isn't, I am going to heaven so I'm not afraid of death, and because you don't believe that then you are the one who should be afraid of death.
Exo64 1 year ago
@Exo64 I am scared of death in the same way most people are, beyond that I'm not so terrified that I have to make up an invisible man in the sky that will make me live forever. I was dead for billions of years before I was born, I can't complain about returning to the painless nothingness. As a sidenote, Eternal life would be the worst torture I can think of. Sure the first few millenia would be awesome, but what about all the ones after that for an infinite amount of time?
SpiderShaman3323 1 year ago
@SpiderShaman3323 If i were to die and go to nothingness that would be fine, but why do that when you could live in perfection and paradise forever its not like living forever on earth. and if I were to return to nothingness after death then why would anyone be so scared as to make a God to turn to.
Exo64 1 year ago
Don't know what the opening and closing statements have anything to do with the content.....so this guy learned this information from someone else...That makes him an expert on what exists in the afterlife? Or because he knows a couple facts he's proven God don't exist? This just shows how grande God is. In fact the Darwin quote is innacurate as scientist are rethinking gravity....the more we learn the more we realize how much we don't know. This dude is clinging to outdated Darwin theories!
chillincochillin 2 years ago
You say that the theory of darwinian natural selection is outdated? The idea of magical gods have been with us for hundreds of thousands of years. Which one is outdated here?
TummyTush 2 years ago 2
Oh ya! Wow, deep insight dude! Way to go! You say belief in gods has been around so long that that makes it outdated good one--whatever, dummy. Darwinism is outdated because of the science we have that has basically proven evolution to be impossible. Darwin said himself that if life is more complex beyond the cell then my theory is no good. Even Pasteur did some experiments that proved that life can only come from life, unlike Darwin's theory. MOREOVER, Darwin, like other theories STOP near
chillincochillin 2 years ago
you complete moron.
jedaaa 2 years ago
In other words ... nothing comes from nothing ...
So, the physical universe was created by ... something... there is intelligent design ... too much order in the universe to have just ... materialized that way...
And ... too much to us to have just materialized this way ... even if they are trying to explain it through evolution...
radiospirit 2 years ago
@radiospirit Pascals Wager is the most retarded argument for the existence of god. What if you're wrong for being a christian, and instead should be hindu? Avoiding the hell of one god condemns you the hell of another. When you realise why you reject every other god you will understand why I reject yours.
SpiderShaman3323 2 years ago
You don't know much about Hinduism, do you? Your ignorance shines right through...
Pascal's Wager isn't about arguing whether or not Christianity is "genuine".
You offer NOTHING... That's all that I'm pointing out...
radiospirit 2 years ago
@radiospirit We offer knowledge and truth, and we actually deliver. And its not about what we offer, its about what is true and what is not. I'd also wager that I know more about Hinduism than you do, considering I'm Indian.
SpiderShaman3323 2 years ago
Hinduism is a prehistoric pagan religion that doesn't even recognize the existence of a sole creator. You don't even qualify for an audition...
Holy Cow!!
radiospirit 2 years ago
@radiospirit That isnt the point you moron, the point is that Pascals Wager is a useless tool for debating for any gods existence. Just because you've chosen a god doesn't mean you have chosen the right one.
SpiderShaman3323 2 years ago
Oh, my goodness... I'm the moron who doesn't worship cows...
Anyway, Pascal's Wager doesn't argue the point of the creator...
You want to believe that you will come back as a frog ... be my guest.
And your caste system is for the birds...
Maybe you are the one who has been deceived...
radiospirit 2 years ago
I'm not a Hindu, being Indian doesn't automatically make me one. And for once you're right, Pascal's Wager doesn't argue the point for a specific creator, it argues that being a member of a religion is a safer bet than being an Atheist. This is a completely retarded point to argue from as your religion is has no greater chance of being right as anyother. So how likely do you think it is that the religion you have chosen is the right one out of a mountain of existing ones and others yet to be.
SpiderShaman3323 2 years ago
Because I can tell the difference between pagan religions and the truth...
radiospirit 2 years ago
Holy crap, it doesn't matter what two religions you compare the point is that Pascal's Wager is completely useless just like your religion and all the other ones. Take your mind poison somewhere else.
SpiderShaman3323 2 years ago
At first I was going to ask how you could know what the 3 most common elements in the universe was...but it makes sense after I thought about it.
Jeffieboi 2 years ago
Hmm three element O²,hydrogen and helium, this three element may helps us travel through space.
upfran 2 years ago
Dont mean to be a cock cool vid but they dont think its between 15-20 billion they think it is 13.7 billion years old :-)
steelblood51 2 years ago
Thank you for this clip :):):)
liberalatheist 2 years ago
more stars than there are grains of sand on this planet? hmm not convinced on that one.. unless someone wants to count them all.... be sure to post a vid!
o0DarkDonnie0o 2 years ago
In 1962, MIT, did count the grains of sand in a table spoon. And from there they did just multiply the table spoons into a square foot box. and then so on and so on. They calculated this with an average of 300 billion stars per normal Galaxy, (however, they are galaxies 10 fold of this). Impossible as it sounds my friend, they are right. There are more stars out there than sands on beaches. Our tech. counts around 200 billion Galaxies, there could be trillions outthere, we just dont know
mikebe41 2 years ago
ok it's not moon light it's just the sun..
24rangkiller 2 years ago
Do not investiagate into this Earthlings...soon all will be revealed!
Joe81094 2 years ago
Consider the randomness of evolution. Take a handful of scrabble letters, two handfuls if you want. See how many tries it takes to come up with this simple line of Shakespear:"To be or not to be." Remember, you cannot intelligently pull aside the word 'be' or 'to' because that would be an intelligent being creating a word and we want to see what randomness can do. When you tire of this experiment, consider how many intermediate forms must have nonbeneficial mutations if random is the rule.
poodlepink 2 years ago
Adam named the animals and God named the stars, all of the stars have a God given name,  boggles my mind and I ah humbled by the love of God.
shitzulovey 3 years ago
I'm guessing you didn't watch the video then.
karadan100 2 years ago
Um...that paper folding thing...is dont think its true. I think its is that when we fold a piece of paper (the usual A4 size paper), it becomes very strong around this fold #, but come on, there are mechanical presses that can squish steel flat, and you're telling me its physically impossible to bend a bunch of plant fibers?
Not buying it.
Vildasnaga 3 years ago
the first quote in the description is mis-attributed. it is Dawkins, not Darwin, who said it.
gyd67ckn 3 years ago
i love it from seth
JKhg55455 3 years ago
i love it seth
JKhg55455 3 years ago
Religion and spirituality are not the same. Religion is a cult, often ruled and manipulated by powerfull people who try to control the masses.
Spirituality is the human search for fundamental questions, peace and harmony with everything that exists.
I'm all for space exploration but what humans have to achieve doens'nt change if you are on Earth or any other planet.
JUst a personal thought.
Clicephas 3 years ago 6
Comment removed
stella2817 2 years ago
Comment removed
stella2817 2 years ago
@01:32 "if you fold a piece of paper in half 44 times it will reach the moon" ... WTF! Nonsense, i dare say its impossable to fold an a sheet of paper in half 44 times, not thatt im willing to check it out, and it defo won't get to the moon.. Please enlighten me if ive missed something
MrSabre11 3 years ago
if 1 side of paper is roughly 1/32 in thick, double that (1fold) would make it 1/16, then 1/8,1/4,1/2 then 1 inch, after 5 folds, 2in,4in,8in,16in,32in. 10 folds. it is 2feet and 8in. thick 64, 128, 256, 512,1025,2048, 4096,8192,16384 and 32,768in after 20 folds it is 2,730 feet thick. skipping, ahead. on the 44th fold the paper is 549,755,813,888 inches thick, that's 45,812,984,490.2/3 feet div. that by 5280 and it equals 8,676,701.6/11 miles. the moon is only 252,687 miles away
devin6691 3 years ago
yes amazing maths. but the fact remains you can not fold a peice of paper in half 44 times. it is physicaly impossable, try it... Its a stupid hypothesis..sorry.. you can only fold a peice of paper in half 7 mb 8 times... so the paper would meed to be 50km thick (approx) if it was ever to be possable for a peice of paper to be folded in half and reach the moom. Now the physics would change for a peice of paper that big, and who could fold that anyway even if it could be.
MrSabre11 3 years ago
Fact... No peice of paper can be folded in half 44 times..
therfore, no peice of paper can be folded in half enough times to reach the moon.
therfore, @01:32 there is a useless statistic that only wows a mind not in focus and makes a mockery out of the video and the unsuspecting viewer..
sorry
MrSabre11 3 years ago
no shit you retard. the video uses that as a way to visually understand the distance. why do you tell me impossible to fold the paper, then throw out the 50km idea? i was simply explaining it to other viewers. read my previous comment saying something like "if you fold the paper (in half) 44 times, it would have doubled enough to make it to the moon, since we cannot fold it 44 times, its called an assumption and the paper would not actually leave the earth, learn to read dumbshit.
devin6691 3 years ago
ok, im a retard.... all im saying is its a dumb assumption based on as impossability.. now, if you use an example that in not based in reality, how do you thinks on other facts and info in the video, it discredits them.. If something me i always check the info and research further, when i see a vid or article has some dubious info then obviously it become hard to trust the info.. you get what i mean...
Really i was just saying its impossable.. no need to throw insults around
MrSabre11 3 years ago
does you intellect has any better reason to survive? I sincerely hope not
ecitsujwon 3 years ago
yeah, the god that created my special planet has a reason to survive: he's ME
FOXMcCLOUD74647 3 years ago
Halo Ring? =)
kamilfreeman 3 years ago
great vid except that some of yr 'facts' aren't!---and the closing quote owes more to an inbred elites self-justification than to the nature of the universe
skylarkio 3 years ago
ur all gay!
especially newyorkowner.
thumbs up me if ur Cool!
Killcular 3 years ago
how long has the oldest religion been on this planet?? and how old is this planet? does it add up???? thought so......
newyorkowner 3 years ago
The Universe is so wonderfull and splended, how could it not have a creator?
roosters86 3 years ago
I agree with you, it is wonderful and spendid, and maybe a creator, but not a GOD. Creator and God are different.
mikebe41 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i don't think jupiter is a gas giant--i think it is solid like earth..also, the sun isn't a nuclear reactor but electromagnetic; the moon is an artificial satellite towed here around 30,000 years ago i expect
skylarkio 3 years ago
nutcase
metalmaniacmat 3 years ago
maniac
skylarkio 3 years ago
lol, youtubes comment system is so stuffed up
metalmaniacmat 3 years ago
thanks to me--i comment on everything! the 'artificial' moon is really nothing of the kind!! infact it's made of an element called greencheese; discovered many centuries ago, by A.N. Olde Houswiff--and suppressed by NASA
skylarkio 3 years ago
and why would NASA lie in the first place?
metalmaniacmat 3 years ago
they enjoy it (thoroughly); specially about all those satellites they're twatting about with up there...designed to track/programme us devolved microchipped serfs! born liars---it's a prerequisite for working there
skylarkio 3 years ago
if you spray the moon with copper dust it will turn green 4 deffo i think it will look ok.
AUTubeN22 3 years ago
I guess you believe the Earth is flat and 6000 years old too, huh? And that the Sun and planets revolve around the earth? Yea. Nutjob.
opiates 2 years ago
but jesus walk on the water is a big deal. the only petty miracle your god can perform?? changing water to wine and some manna from heavan. did your god told how to create laptop??
paparali 3 years ago
@paparali really? first of all I think that making enough food to feed a whole nation is at least on the same level as laptop if not greater and secondly the God who created us gave the laptop's inventor the mental skill to create such a great device so there ya go
Exo64 1 year ago
I hope that the Universe is much fuller of joyfullness than the song used as background to this video.
astat1 3 years ago 2
it took 13years 13 jurers 13mins to finaly do justice to OJ simpson lol hope my maths is right. i cant seem to work out that if the sun is 93million miles away how does earth travel only 1.5 million miles per day to get round the sun?????????
AUTubeN22 3 years ago
It doesn't say that moron, it says ON it's way around the sun, it travels 1.5 million miles a day.
camy2311 3 years ago
ok thanks i want paying attention! what does he mean when hwe says a folded A4 sheet 44 times it will reach the moon. may be if you fired it from a rocket launcher it would survive the eliments! may be if it was possible to fold it that many times longways say its 11 inches long folded 5 times and each fold doubles the amount of creases 5 folds gets you 32x11 inches i take it that 10 folds gets more than 64 right? wtf?
AUTubeN22 3 years ago
if you fold the paper (in half) 44 times, it would have doubled enough to make it (distance) to the moon, since we cannot fold it 44 times, its called an assumption and the paper would not actually leave the earth, more of a "if you did this, this would happen"
devin6691 3 years ago
Your Darwin quote is fake. That is a Richard Dawkins quote .(River Out Of Eden, p.133)
Loved it otherwise.
Rfive 3 years ago
oh come on some of his facts are not true!!!!!!!! omg!
Nicole7712 3 years ago
I wish you named one.
Rfive 3 years ago
i don't get 3"32
DilophoLvr 3 years ago
Praise the Lord!
pedjazoo 3 years ago
are the aliens sexy like jessica alba ?
metaLboK 3 years ago
for more of this look into my channel
TheJerico246 3 years ago
Uh, that Charles Darwin quote is wrong. That is from Richard Dawkins' The Selfish Gene.
kwarhol07 4 years ago 2
Yeaaah
cherryberry360 3 years ago
but most don't die because of religion, they die from starvation, disease and poor living conditions. Even if religious wars ended, they would still be dying.
Dagobert10 4 years ago
Currency is a large contributory factor unfortunately.
urquiza78 3 years ago
I don't get the A4 paper thing at all...
MoonTrot101 4 years ago
same... fold A4 paper 44 times = moon??
What do you mean?
LordOfTheNoob 4 years ago
Assuming my math is on the right track ;)
If you (hypothetically) fold a paper 44 times, you double the thickness 44 times. (i.e. fold a 0.1 mm paper 4 times, it becomes respectively 0.2->0.4->0.8->1.6 mm thick.
folding is 'times 2' we double 4 times so the thickness increases 2^4 = 16 times (0.1x16=1.6mm)
If we fold 44 times, it increases 2^44=17592186044416 times.
17592186044416 x 0.1 mm is 1759218604441.6 mm
that's 1,759,218 kilometers. Actual distance to the moon = 384,403 KM ;)
mindwis3 3 years ago 4
"I don't get the A4 paper thing at all"
Provided my math is correct, i provided the calculation underneath ;)
Please correct any errors you find in it.
Based on my calculation, folding a 0.1mm piece of paper 44 times is actually 4,5 times the distance to the moon ;)
I didn't do any actual folding though ;)
mindwis3 3 years ago
The universe is such a BIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG Place... if only earth supports life..
Man.. it is ONE GIGANTIC WASTE OF SPACE!
Maybe humans in the future will migrate into outerspace and live on other planets.. or hopefully we find "aliens".
LordOfTheNoob 4 years ago 4
earth = terra, terra was a goddess >.>
SNoRRo 4 years ago 2
avionic means seventeen quintillions
HoshoNoKaabii 4 years ago
I Agree with PrometheansFiree, We need to stop all this violence because it is destroying our species! If i could i would lead a project to colonize mars
Razorlvirus 4 years ago 2
Thank you indartims for this amazing video and music... Oh no, Pluto is/was my ruling planet for Scorpio...
lovingflame 4 years ago
Just amazing, absolutely amazing.
Matty231 4 years ago
i like this video, but on the side you should look up hawkings other quote on how in his study of black holes, he is starting to find that a creator must exist.
AEC32094 4 years ago
I think you mean he is concluding a beginning. Not necessarily the same thing.
themadhair 4 years ago
song
artist: lisa gerard
title: see the sun
mhdh3e 4 years ago
Fold a paper in half 44 times it will reach the moon? please enlighten me
Avionicgenius 4 years ago
Just think of simple math (X)^44 is a huge!!!!!! number. So if the thickness of paper was double 44 times then that number would be huge.
kipcityrecords 4 years ago
The way i see it, if it's less than a meter, and if you put 0.something to the power 44, it justs gets smaller.
for example
(1/2)^Whatever is never greater than 1
So please enlighten me..
Avionicgenius 4 years ago
Do a simple experiment. Try fold an A4 paper 8 times.
2^44 is 17,500,000,000,000, or seventeen thousand billion sheets of paper.
grisflyt 4 years ago
Thats completely different to what he said, you're talking about having 17,500,000,000,000 sheets of paper.
Not 1. At 1.32 you'll see 'a piece of A4'. Now i think he might have just misworded this.
Avionicgenius 4 years ago
If you fold a sheet at the middle 44 times you get 17,500,000,000,000 very tiny "sheets" of paper. I.e. it's the same as stacking 17,500,000,000,000 sheets of paper.
You previous post is completely wrong. You don't have to know math to know that. It's enough to know that two sheets on top of each other are not thinner than one sheet.
grisflyt 4 years ago
What an amazing video indartims !!! Great job!! I love the song whats the title and from what artist ?? Seeing how vast is the universe makes you think twice that we are not alone out there. And if we are alone... well seems to me like an awfull waste of space !! don't you think ??? Thanks for video amazing work my friend !!!
carlos0259774 4 years ago
We all must learn something. Germany produced Einstein, and Josef Mengele. The first one used his knowledge to do good things, the second were called Doctor Death. As we can see, people can use science and religion( not God), to hide their real intention. Keep not trusting in men words. Look around you and you will discover many hidden things that just the humble of heart can see. Keep your kindness and you will discover an excellent way.Auf wiedersehen mein bruder!!
mitube1979 4 years ago
i wish humans never came into existence
ZzBuRnTzZ 4 years ago
me too mate, espescially you.
PigeonHead57 4 years ago
44 doesn't seem like much. That's amazing!
BradkenResources 4 years ago
you can only fold a piece of A4 paper properly 8 times at the most
punkdorky 4 years ago
wtf if u fold a piece of a4 paper in half 44 times it will reach the moon i dont get it
rampart23 4 years ago
When you fold the paper once, you double the thickness, the fold again it's four times, the third fold is 8 and so on. Paper thickness x 2x2x2x2...x2x2 (repeated 44 times) = the distance to the moon, I assume. Give it a try and see if it works. I couldn't get past 7 folds. I guess I won't be going to the moon anytime soon
CHAS1422 4 years ago
Longest Journey begins with the first step. :)
IndianRationalist 4 years ago
2^42 times 0.1 mm (thickness of paper) equals 440,000 km, which is approximately (further than) the distance to the Moon. It need not be A4 paper.
IndianRationalist 4 years ago
we are not alone , there must be others out there
soon49 4 years ago
Who? Where? How are you so sure about it? Is it just an intuition or any empirical evidence.
IndianRationalist 4 years ago
8 planets in out solar system, (and just say that every star has 8 planets). 250 billion stars and 100 billion galaxies. which means that there is approximatley 200,000,000,000,000 planets. the chances of life elsewhere is pretty high if not certain
lufcjoeg06 4 years ago
Even largest of numbers are not so large, when on Astronomical scale; smallest fraction is not small enough, when we consider Planck Time 5.39x10^-44 second.
While 2x10^14 is a big number (can bigger, factoring dark matter, parallel universes et al) yet we do not expect number of planets with life commensurate to this scale; hence big numbers cannot be a determinant rationale.
IndianRationalist 4 years ago
well i no that scientists are only estimating these numbers, but i cant see that there are all these stars and galaxies, and yet we are the only planet with life on it
lufcjoeg06 4 years ago
It is certainly likely that there is life elsewhere. There is not indication, let alone an evidence so far. We need to rely on evidence rather than intuition.
IndianRationalist 4 years ago
Besides, lacking any empirical evidence or even a credible scientific theory predicting life elsewhere, numbers, howsoever big, has little significance.
Much as we cannot rule out existence of life elsewhere, lacking any empirical evidence & theoretical prediction, this is an issue only in exploratory domain. Logically, Negative evidence in terms of non-existence is not expected in speculative domain.
Based on telescopic observations, a century back many were certain of intelligent life on Mars.
IndianRationalist 4 years ago
When we can believe everything we hear about the universe, it is a FACT that there is life on other planets. Although it is in our knowledge the smallest lifeforms possible that can survive in outer space, on meteors and comets. Isn't this enough proof that there is life on other planets? Intelligent life is another subject but that's just a matter of time isn't it?
JulienKraakman 4 years ago
We do not believe everything we hear about the Universe. It is necessary to have a positive confirmation of existence of life, rather than a negative evidence of non-existence. This is what scientific empirical evidence is about.
It will be exciting to get confirmation about evidence of life elsewhere; intelligent life will be awesome.
IndianRationalist 4 years ago
times have changed. we have better technology and better understanding so who knows
lufcjoeg06 4 years ago
My opinion: the purpose is love. I know it may sound foolish, but
i can back that, and I don't agree with everything Darwin thinks.
louisgdehaut 4 years ago
You think the purpose of the ever expanding universe is love? How can you back that? btw, no modern scientist "agrees with everything Darwin thought".
johnnyfatsac 4 years ago
This Scientist had your name, and he agreed with you about science.
You are not foolish. The reason of all creation is love.
"A little bit of science will estrange men from God, but much science will lead them back to Him."-Louis Pasteur ...
mitube1979 4 years ago
The diference between the science and faith is that, the first one, can change everytime, and mankind says that it is evolution.We need more faith to believe in scientific data.
mitube1979 4 years ago
And alot more to believe in magic. Once you have EVIDENCE for something, it takes 0, I repeat, 0 faith to believe in it. Scientific research and data is what? That evidence.
xcalic01 4 years ago
"A little bit of science will estrange men from God, but much science will lead them back to Him."-Louis Pasteur ...
mitube1979 4 years ago
Unlike religious folks, I don't care what another man has to say. Because he's just a what? A man. I listen to what evidence have to say, not scientist either. I'm an agnostic. I'm willing to take heed in "God" have to say as long as he provides me with evidence of his own existance. By the way, who's God would I be led to in time. The Greek Gods? The Hindu Gods? The Chinese God? To whom? Catch ya' later. I'm going out now. I wanna discuss this.
xcalic01 4 years ago
I is not just a matter of liking or not. But everything about life . We cannot say : I don't like, so I will not discuss. About prove something, the human being Cannot prove anything. We not even discover the cure of influenza virus. . But the thing that we cannot prove don't mean that don't exists.Evidence? . Hitler proved with evidences that white was superior. Catholic church used the evidences to put fire in human beings.Many evidences are produced by men.
mitube1979 4 years ago
I have alot of grammatical errors in my prior responce, I'm sorry. Now, what's all this like or dislike business? I said I wanna discuss this. It's not a problem. Never heard of "influenza virus", but hey, eventually we'll find a cure IN TIME. Why are you all always in a hurry? Macro-evo. takes TIME too. Hilter and Catholics? I said it before. I don't what MAN have to say. Provide physical and scientific evidence.
xcalic01 4 years ago
As for Hilter's "evidence", I'm black but I won't turn this into a race game. He was a great leader. Look at what he's done. He was also partially demented. He was also influenced by psuedo science and propaganda. And yes, whites do tend to progresss while my people sit back and do nothing except alot of bullshit. Then cry this "white oppression" propaganda as an excuss to remain doing nothing. Hilter is probably right. He meant German white though, not the rustics of America.
xcalic01 4 years ago
I dont know if he was smart or germans were stupid. He said that superior was: Blond hair, German, and blue eyes. He had brown eyes, brown hair and was foreigner, and convinced Germans to hate other people.
I have Russian Italian and German blood. But when I am bleeding the color is the same of my Black friends. Believe me: Today the pseudo science rules the world.I liked your way, because you don't make yourself a victim. It is a great step.
mitube1979 4 years ago
I doubt the Germans were stupid. They were ages ahead in the fields of science and are still the most extraordinary engineers of the world. Back in WW II their foes were ONLY superior in numbers, alliances and resources. Germany produces some of the most brillant scientist ever and still do. They were lost once because an ingenius leader led them from reality with his vision. They are still our brothers. Thanks for the compliment man. I'm only 17 don't get me wrong. I have much to learn still.
xcalic01 4 years ago
@xcalic01 so wait what belief or science did he follow I've Heard lutheran, Atheist, Occult, and Satanism
Exo64 1 year ago
Nice music
IrishMarc1 4 years ago
Very good video.
ArtistIreland 4 years ago
what is the thing on 1:37 mean/do...whatever.
DESR95 4 years ago
I'd Say there isn't a number nor calculation more acurate then saying that the universe is 'infinite'...
verkinstock13 4 years ago
That's a stupid assumption i think. Because if the universe would be infinite, there would exsist worlds so absurd, simply impossible. Why? Absurdity is impossible.
JulienKraakman 4 years ago
I'd say that is a stupid assumption. Simply because nothing can be infinite. If the universe was to be infinite, such strange and absurd worlds would exsist, which is not possible. An infinite amount of space, means an infinite amount of objects and things.
JulienKraakman 4 years ago
Has anyone established that the Universe is finite (or otherwise)?
Quantum statistics in particular & mechanics in general, to begin with appears absurd, destabilizes our belief in (Scientific) Determinism etc but experiments after experiment prove it. Quotes of Einstein on Quantum Uncertainty will bring out this point.
IndianRationalist 4 years ago
I actually don't believe Quantum is uncertain. There has to be some logic in it, even though it's even smaller then what we know now.
But still the simple formula tells us it's almost (like 99,999999999999%) impossible that the universe is infinite:
Infinite amound of space = Infinite amount of objects = Infinite amound of possibilities. Are you suggesting somewhere in the universe Elvis is still alive?
JulienKraakman 4 years ago
Nice vid!But check out my vid too :D
joonaskanter 4 years ago
Very good music, pics and facts. Just a bit sad that you don't have purpose in your life and feel emptiness in your heart :(
Unless?
DavidDoodleBug 4 years ago
awesome!
*****
JesseGuitar07 4 years ago
nice vid !
Fefou123 4 years ago
I do agree with darwin, but this video is just a combination of simple facts with very crappy music!
sjimenezh 4 years ago
The topic covered is my favourite but there isnt anything in form of some message or proof, it is a mere compilation of facts. It is also not a movie but pps converted to movie. The music didnt make any sense, yet it is worth watching. Darwin's original theory has been modified for betterment, but in principle it stands tall & firm.
IndianRationalist 4 years ago
I disagree with Darwin I believe that there is some form of design in the Universe though to waht pupose it is desdigned has not fully been revealed yet.
deligthelf 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Darwins an idiot. Any non-God believing scientist can tell you that the universe is deeply designed in complexity. Darwin hated God and even referred to himself, in his memoirs, as a pastor of Satan. After his 10 year old daughter died, he turned his life to trying to explain away God.
justog3 4 years ago
"Any non-God believing scientist can tell you that the universe is deeply designed in complexity" How does that make Darwin an idiot? what are you taking about ? :S
USSNovus 4 years ago
Dont abuse Darwin & get personal quoting an personal life event; just talk about Evolution. Continue to oppose Evolution, profess Flat Earth, persecute Galileo, believe earth is 6000 years old ... please be so kind to do so on facts & logic. Most scientist agree that Darwin changed the scientific world more than Einstein & Planck did.
IndianRationalist 4 years ago
And you call US narrow minded?
sexyAllen4u 4 years ago
not understood reference to US?
IndianRationalist 4 years ago
Very nice video. Thank You.
don2561 4 years ago
the question is if the big bang theory is correct...where the hell did the matter to begin with come from?
and im with BigCMusic...what is A4 paper?
BoobTubeTV 4 years ago
nobody knows how old the universe is only Godï