Mr. Siddiqui and his cohorts brought 8 lakh army personnel to Kashmir. Pre-1989 there were no personnel in Kashmir. When various factions including JKLF took up armed struggle against acting government, what did they think was going to happen? If the issue is the presence of troops on Kashmir soil, surely Mr. Siddiqi must admit that their presence was necessitated by decision to wage armed struggle against Indian troops.
He claims that 8 lakh army personnel are present in Kashmir, and with the army present how can people in the land be free. Then one can argue that NONE of the Indian States bordering Pakistan are free?
The army is there to defend against the terrorist nation of PAKISTAN and the supporters of this Terrorist action.
Mr. Siddiqui and his cohorts brought 8 lakh army personnel to Kashmir. Pre-1989 there were no personnel in Kashmir. When various factions including JKLF took up armed struggle against acting government, what did they think was going to happen? If the issue is the presence of troops on Kashmir soil, surely Mr. Siddiqi must admit that their presence was necessitated by decision to wage armed struggle against Indian troops.
GNabi918 3 years ago
He claims that 8 lakh army personnel are present in Kashmir, and with the army present how can people in the land be free. Then one can argue that NONE of the Indian States bordering Pakistan are free?
The army is there to defend against the terrorist nation of PAKISTAN and the supporters of this Terrorist action.
moesharma 3 years ago