@S2Cents Plato abandoned his aristocratic heritage after the trial (judicial murder) of Socrates. Athenian life was shitloads better than the sociopathic gaylords of Sparta.
In Plato's "Republic" you find a whole bunch of material about corruption in political life and the PROBLEMS of having an aristocracy when it becomes corrupt (which meant it was no longer made up of the 'aristos' - BEST - people).
Plato didn't have the balls to be anarchist, so fuck him. Diogenes, bitchez. And Ikkyu.
@HieronymousAnonymous "aristos" Hmm, just saw that word recently. Until a couple days ago, dont recall seeing it before. Aristocracy is always corrupt. Too much power and wealth = aristocracy = corruption = eventual social and political turmoil and revolution = dictatorship = overthrow of regime = new dictatorship or temporary divided power arrangement between victorious factions..........
@HieronymousAnonymous kinda cynical, just maybe? democracy is just sanctified gang rape. Well at least you didn't use the ole, "democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner". I'm not interested in arguing against a dark view of the nature of politics here, but would you have a position on what constitutes the least worst type of system ?
@S2Cents not cynical: rational. Take a huge bucket of cash & power: all you have to do to control it, is to get the support of the gullible plus those who think they will benefit from you having power. Who wins that game? Liars.
The least-worst system: anarchy. This isn't just "something I learned on the internet": I graduated summa cum - & top of my graduating class - in Economics, straight firsts at Masters; dropped out of PhD (financial market salaries were MUCH more than my scholarship).
@S2Cents Nope - because under anarchism ("voluntaryism" is a better term), nobody can be forced to FUND things that they don't subscribe to.
If .gov can't TAX the people who don't vote for them (or who don't vote at all), and can't decree that they are on the hook for debts accrued by the State, then those who DO vote realise they can't get their policy wishes subsidised by the electoral 'losers'.
Besides, democracy always degenerates into Party-ocracy as corrupt as the worst aristocracy.
@S2Cents anarchism is the absence of a coercive State (i.e., no government that can tax you under threat of punishment).
'Public' goods such as defence, public heath and welfare are funded by user-pays plus voluntary contribution and non-Ponzi insurance; contacts are enforced through competitive dispute-resolution organisations rather than monopoly 'courts'.
In short: our relationship with the State becomes similar to our relationship with religion and church.
My previous response should read "CONTRACTs are enforced through competitive dispute-resolution organisations rather than monopoly courts.", not "CONTACTs... etc"
@HieronymousAnonymous I like this. But how could this anarchist society actually be brought about? And if this system were achieved, how could it realistically be maintained and not overthrown itself by corruption from within and/or eternal enemies?
@S2Cents that's the jillion-dollar question: in the past whenever the political class has finally driven any society into a ditch, the tendency is for the society to replace a now-acknowledged set of crooks (the Bourbons in France; the English Crown in the American colonies) with a self-styled 'saviour set' (e.g., the "Founding Fathers").
BUT this sets up a system that eventually becomes EXACTLY like the one being replaced. Always. Parasites gotta parasite, I guess.
@HieronymousAnonymous The next question then is this: is anarchism merely an unobtainable dream? If an anarchist society cannot realistically be achieved then is spending time considering it a waste of time? In any case what CAN be done and should we not focus on workable, real solutions? etc.
@S2Cents also - not for nothin'... Iceland had a peaceful quasi-anarchic system (with market-based justice) from about 900AD to about 1300AD. 400 years.
By contrast: the US lasted less than ten years before it first embarked on huge internal slaughter (the expansion into native lands by force)... and less than 100 years after the Consitution was ratified the Civil War killed and maimed over a million people (60 years AFTER the UK and France had outlawed slavery peacefully).
@HieronymousAnonymous Regarding the Civil War- I find this history utterly fascinating. Couple points:Good time to be interested w/ it being the 150th anniversary. Anyway the European powers outlawing slavery and the US having to split in half and butcher itself -the Europeans were content to purchase the cotton produced by slaves and for various reasons didn't need or were encouraged by circumstances to be done w/ slavery I dont know if US had to fight to end it tho
@S2Cents one thing about anarchy is that there can't be 'corruption' as we use the term - with no ruling class there are no public resources (taxes, government land, government contracts) to be diverted to cronies. There might be attempts by firms to 'BECOME' a govt - but unless they can get people to comply voluntarily, the market simply won't let that happen. Folks think monopolies will take over - but most monopoly power is CAUSED by government policy favours.
@S2Cents last but not least - dealing with external threats is relatively easy. Just be like the Swiss - they had no army, but they let would-be invaders know that invading them would be trying to swallow a porcupine (Even the Nazis didn't try). If they come anyhow... well, since WWII the Viet Cong, the Iraqi insurgency and the Afghans have humiliated 2 superpowers.
China knows that invasion-based resource acquisition is DUMB. They come to TRADE, and they're kicking the West's butt.
@Tamaresque I don't think you know what common sense is - or how often it's wrong.
Every significant written work in human history states the obvious - compare the US Bill of Rights with "R v Huggett" or "R v Tooley" (both cases predate the Bill of Rights; both are English law; both concern individual common law Rights against abuse of power; both found AGAINST the Crown).
Or compare the Declaration of Independence with Etienne de la Boetie's "The Doctrine of Voluntary Servitude" from 1550.
AIG was bailed out to pay the NUMBER ONE BENEFICIARY GOLDMAN SACHS. Hank Paulson, CEO of Goldman Sachs, became Treasury Secretary and then sells $500 million Goldman stock TAX FREE. Paulson then pushed the AIG bailout to cover Goldman Sachs Credit Default Swaps (bets against the housing market) bought from AIG. watch?v=-hhPvas-Q8Y&feature=channel_video_title
Few people realise this, but later in life he got an Android tablet (he HATED ipads, because he was allergic to bullshit) and used the free 3G data allowance to participate in a "If You Hate Them" thread on 4chan /b/.
He was locked up under the NDAA and has not been seen since.
I thought the bridge/walkway was a great idea. It gives a sensical reason for why things are always passing between the sun and the cave wall.
But, key things were glossed over that I think would go missed by those unfamiliar with the story. The fact that they understood the shadows as reality should be more explicit.
The sun is the illuminator in all meanings. It is blinding at first, and unbelievable compared to our prior understanding of reality. The adjustment is not easy.
@RemohJS oh jesus wept... so the allegory needed to be more *precise*, to hold the hand of the reader and guide them through the process of understanding?
What are we, American public-school students?
1: It's an ADAPTATION.
2: *ALLEGORY* is DESIGNED to have multiple layers of interpretation. For example, the chains are convention or ignorance - depends how you look at it.
Maybe you should wait for the "3D Director's Cut" version on DVD... or maybe actually go and READ IT.
Yeah. This was cool...I liked the look of it. But some vital parts were definitely left out! For instance, Before the prisoner leaves the cave, he is supposed to notice the fire and the people/animals and other stuff parading in front of it. Then he sees a light and heads toward it and exits the cave. Then there is a gradual awakening to higher reality...all of this stuff is vital to the allegory.
@lordofthewolves13 it doesn't purport to be a full rendition of the allegory. I am pretty sure I have seen a fuller treatment of the allegory (perhaps it's at the site).
There are some important aspect of the Plato's epistemology out of that recreation. f. e. j. the analogy fo the fire and de sun or the process to turn the view from the external into the intelective. Very simple. I prefer Matrix recreation.
@MoOkS187 anyone who reads the entire dialogue realises that it's mostly about how the majority only see the 'shadows' of political machinations; when confronted with the reality they get a shock, and if they try to convince the cave-dwellers of the error they're perpetuating they can't get them to 'get it'.
One of the last few lines is to the effect that philosophers should always be OPPOSED to the quest for political power. WORD.
doesnt anyone see a comparison between The Matrix and Plato's cave?
I especially am refering to the scene where neo is told ppl are nothing more than bateries then he gets angry and distressed at first, vomits, collapses gets depressed and at last he acts uppon this knowledge.
@GzusCriest Yes and its derived from this allegory and what you would expect from the human psyche, but the rest of the matrix was not more then a colourful way to display this allegory as well (with a story etc behind it, appealing to modern day people).
Lol, I remember this last year. Used to tell the truth that most people don't try to find. In the passage, the men can't look apon objects directly, but theyre shadow, but slowly look at the direct object as if trying to find there own opinions and truths. FInally the direct truth is the sun itself. Enlightment of the world. The fire in the cave are suppose to be other peoples opinions that people believe. Like TV shows or politic infromation listened on the radio.
They should have read the Allegory a little more closely. It's really important how angry the prisoner is at not understanding the real world. He only knows the shadows and at first the real world is the fake world to him. Not bad clay here, but for gods sakes get the shit right.
Good grief. After reading most of the comments, I first shook my head in pity at the intellectual vacuum and woeful derth of substantive curiosity; but then I shook my head in amusement. These comments: talk about appropriate. :-)
this is in "the republic of plato" a text written by Plato who was the apostle of Socrates the prisoners are tied up facing a wall with a fire behind them and because a fire is in constant movement it acts as a puppeteer of sorts whenever anything comes between the fire and the prisoners now the story goes that the prisoner escapes the cave and after seeing the world for what it truly is desires to go back to tell the others when he does they kill him...you cannot speak of logos concerning being
One of the best and worst parts of this story is that its an abstract, it can be applied to almost anything in order to give it meaning. I wish I could have heard Platos perception of the story it would have been something to hear.
im not sure, i thought they just said they would kill him if he kept talking about 'The World of Forms' but it could relate to when Socrates was killed after he thought he should be the leader in society
It's a really good way of showing Plato's idea, but it is important for all of those commenting to realise that the idea is not that of the people who made the video. The idea was thought up thousands of years ago. This video simply clarifies it in an easy-to-understand way.
Kudos to the people who made the video. I thought the narration and animation were both really effective.
I just picked up this from stef zucconi's blog. my god....this is fantastic. this really blew me away. thanks and well done.
wierd thing is I have just come back from India where I made my own cave and lived in it for six months. I am also a freeman-on-the-land and have come out of the "allegorical cave". thanks again, you have made me very happy. rich. my space dotcom / zappasearcher
i just saw your lottory story on the t.v and i heard you mention bullhead entertainment.. so i looked it up and it came up with this and i dont see why this isnt real popular its amazing!! the story is good and i love the claymation :) 5/5 and gratz on winning the lotto :)
Greek aristocrats like Plato knew about chaining people up in caves and keeping them in darkness.
S2Cents 2 weeks ago
@S2Cents Plato abandoned his aristocratic heritage after the trial (judicial murder) of Socrates. Athenian life was shitloads better than the sociopathic gaylords of Sparta.
In Plato's "Republic" you find a whole bunch of material about corruption in political life and the PROBLEMS of having an aristocracy when it becomes corrupt (which meant it was no longer made up of the 'aristos' - BEST - people).
Plato didn't have the balls to be anarchist, so fuck him. Diogenes, bitchez. And Ikkyu.
HieronymousAnonymous 1 week ago
@HieronymousAnonymous "aristos" Hmm, just saw that word recently. Until a couple days ago, dont recall seeing it before. Aristocracy is always corrupt. Too much power and wealth = aristocracy = corruption = eventual social and political turmoil and revolution = dictatorship = overthrow of regime = new dictatorship or temporary divided power arrangement between victorious factions..........
S2Cents 1 week ago
@S2Cents for me,NOBODY should be granted political power/rule (kraté, in Greek - that's where '-cracy' comes from).
That said, when we say 'aristocracy' we don't mean 'rule by the BEST' anymore.
Political life is ALWAYS parasitic - so it ALWAYS attracts the worst type pf sociopath; even in 'democracy' (which is just sanctified gang rape).
And ALL political types want more power to themselves. They are parasitic vermin who gain power by fooling the gullible - just like priests.
HieronymousAnonymous 1 week ago
Comment removed
S2Cents 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HieronymousAnonymous kinda cynical, just maybe? democracy is just sanctified gang rape. Well at least you didn't use the ole, "democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner". I'm not interested in arguing against a dark view of the nature of politics here, but would you have a position on what constitutes the least worst type of system ?
S2Cents 1 week ago
@S2Cents not cynical: rational. Take a huge bucket of cash & power: all you have to do to control it, is to get the support of the gullible plus those who think they will benefit from you having power. Who wins that game? Liars.
The least-worst system: anarchy. This isn't just "something I learned on the internet": I graduated summa cum - & top of my graduating class - in Economics, straight firsts at Masters; dropped out of PhD (financial market salaries were MUCH more than my scholarship).
HieronymousAnonymous 1 week ago
@HieronymousAnonymous I thought real anarchism is democratic.
S2Cents 1 week ago
@S2Cents Nope - because under anarchism ("voluntaryism" is a better term), nobody can be forced to FUND things that they don't subscribe to.
If .gov can't TAX the people who don't vote for them (or who don't vote at all), and can't decree that they are on the hook for debts accrued by the State, then those who DO vote realise they can't get their policy wishes subsidised by the electoral 'losers'.
Besides, democracy always degenerates into Party-ocracy as corrupt as the worst aristocracy.
HieronymousAnonymous 1 week ago
@HieronymousAnonymous could you briefly describe/define what anarchism is so I can understand?
S2Cents 1 week ago
@S2Cents anarchism is the absence of a coercive State (i.e., no government that can tax you under threat of punishment).
'Public' goods such as defence, public heath and welfare are funded by user-pays plus voluntary contribution and non-Ponzi insurance; contacts are enforced through competitive dispute-resolution organisations rather than monopoly 'courts'.
In short: our relationship with the State becomes similar to our relationship with religion and church.
HieronymousAnonymous 1 week ago
@S2Cents Oops - typo.
My previous response should read "CONTRACTs are enforced through competitive dispute-resolution organisations rather than monopoly courts.", not "CONTACTs... etc"
HieronymousAnonymous 1 week ago
@HieronymousAnonymous I like this. But how could this anarchist society actually be brought about? And if this system were achieved, how could it realistically be maintained and not overthrown itself by corruption from within and/or eternal enemies?
S2Cents 1 week ago
-eXternal enemies- I meant. in my reply. And so?
S2Cents 1 week ago
@S2Cents that's the jillion-dollar question: in the past whenever the political class has finally driven any society into a ditch, the tendency is for the society to replace a now-acknowledged set of crooks (the Bourbons in France; the English Crown in the American colonies) with a self-styled 'saviour set' (e.g., the "Founding Fathers").
BUT this sets up a system that eventually becomes EXACTLY like the one being replaced. Always. Parasites gotta parasite, I guess.
HieronymousAnonymous 1 week ago
@HieronymousAnonymous The next question then is this: is anarchism merely an unobtainable dream? If an anarchist society cannot realistically be achieved then is spending time considering it a waste of time? In any case what CAN be done and should we not focus on workable, real solutions? etc.
S2Cents 1 week ago
@S2Cents depends on your timeframe.
In 1775 most folks thought that the idea of overthrowing English colonial rule was crazy-talk.
In 1800 if you said "Men should not be slaves" or "peasants should get the vote" you were part of the lunatic fringe.
In 1900 if you said "women should get the vote"... same thing.
In 1920 if you said "Socialism is ridiculous - the USSR is doomed", 'intellectuals' thought you were ignorant.
But someone at the time said each of those things. And here we are.
HieronymousAnonymous 1 week ago
@S2Cents also - not for nothin'... Iceland had a peaceful quasi-anarchic system (with market-based justice) from about 900AD to about 1300AD. 400 years.
By contrast: the US lasted less than ten years before it first embarked on huge internal slaughter (the expansion into native lands by force)... and less than 100 years after the Consitution was ratified the Civil War killed and maimed over a million people (60 years AFTER the UK and France had outlawed slavery peacefully).
HieronymousAnonymous 1 week ago
@HieronymousAnonymous Regarding the Civil War- I find this history utterly fascinating. Couple points:Good time to be interested w/ it being the 150th anniversary. Anyway the European powers outlawing slavery and the US having to split in half and butcher itself -the Europeans were content to purchase the cotton produced by slaves and for various reasons didn't need or were encouraged by circumstances to be done w/ slavery I dont know if US had to fight to end it tho
S2Cents 1 week ago
@S2Cents one thing about anarchy is that there can't be 'corruption' as we use the term - with no ruling class there are no public resources (taxes, government land, government contracts) to be diverted to cronies. There might be attempts by firms to 'BECOME' a govt - but unless they can get people to comply voluntarily, the market simply won't let that happen. Folks think monopolies will take over - but most monopoly power is CAUSED by government policy favours.
HieronymousAnonymous 1 week ago
@S2Cents last but not least - dealing with external threats is relatively easy. Just be like the Swiss - they had no army, but they let would-be invaders know that invading them would be trying to swallow a porcupine (Even the Nazis didn't try). If they come anyhow... well, since WWII the Viet Cong, the Iraqi insurgency and the Afghans have humiliated 2 superpowers.
China knows that invasion-based resource acquisition is DUMB. They come to TRADE, and they're kicking the West's butt.
HieronymousAnonymous 1 week ago
So, what was the point of that? It would appear to be common sense.
Tamaresque 1 month ago
@Tamaresque I don't think you know what common sense is - or how often it's wrong.
Every significant written work in human history states the obvious - compare the US Bill of Rights with "R v Huggett" or "R v Tooley" (both cases predate the Bill of Rights; both are English law; both concern individual common law Rights against abuse of power; both found AGAINST the Crown).
Or compare the Declaration of Independence with Etienne de la Boetie's "The Doctrine of Voluntary Servitude" from 1550.
HieronymousAnonymous 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What is the name of the song?
gerardosilva1980 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AIG was bailed out to pay the NUMBER ONE BENEFICIARY GOLDMAN SACHS. Hank Paulson, CEO of Goldman Sachs, became Treasury Secretary and then sells $500 million Goldman stock TAX FREE. Paulson then pushed the AIG bailout to cover Goldman Sachs Credit Default Swaps (bets against the housing market) bought from AIG. watch?v=-hhPvas-Q8Y&feature=channel_video_title
TruthSeekingMissiles 3 months ago
Comment removed
pyromanizak 4 months ago
This is so sad and deep at the same time.
KiraWei1 9 months ago
I found this quite disturbing. I don't know what it is with really creepy stop-motion. I can handle Gumby and that's about it.
pinkfedoragal 9 months ago
fantastic
tolefezzy 11 months ago
amazing upload!!!! thank you so much!
miffification 1 year ago
Did the prisoner who got out and came back to the cave got killed by his friends??
DontMissVideos 1 year ago
@DontMissVideos no, he lived happily ever after.
Few people realise this, but later in life he got an Android tablet (he HATED ipads, because he was allergic to bullshit) and used the free 3G data allowance to participate in a "If You Hate Them" thread on 4chan /b/.
He was locked up under the NDAA and has not been seen since.
HieronymousAnonymous 1 week ago
I thought the bridge/walkway was a great idea. It gives a sensical reason for why things are always passing between the sun and the cave wall.
But, key things were glossed over that I think would go missed by those unfamiliar with the story. The fact that they understood the shadows as reality should be more explicit.
The sun is the illuminator in all meanings. It is blinding at first, and unbelievable compared to our prior understanding of reality. The adjustment is not easy.
RemohJS 1 year ago
@RemohJS oh jesus wept... so the allegory needed to be more *precise*, to hold the hand of the reader and guide them through the process of understanding?
What are we, American public-school students?
1: It's an ADAPTATION.
2: *ALLEGORY* is DESIGNED to have multiple layers of interpretation. For example, the chains are convention or ignorance - depends how you look at it.
Maybe you should wait for the "3D Director's Cut" version on DVD... or maybe actually go and READ IT.
HieronymousAnonymous 1 week ago
Yeah. This was cool...I liked the look of it. But some vital parts were definitely left out! For instance, Before the prisoner leaves the cave, he is supposed to notice the fire and the people/animals and other stuff parading in front of it. Then he sees a light and heads toward it and exits the cave. Then there is a gradual awakening to higher reality...all of this stuff is vital to the allegory.
lordofthewolves13 1 year ago
@lordofthewolves13 I guess this is all the modern masses on youtube can take in.
jiveturkeyusa 1 year ago
@jiveturkeyusa I guess so. Could've been much better, but the cut the most important stuff to the allegory! Oh well.
lordofthewolves13 1 year ago
@lordofthewolves13 it doesn't purport to be a full rendition of the allegory. I am pretty sure I have seen a fuller treatment of the allegory (perhaps it's at the site).
HieronymousAnonymous 1 week ago
There are some important aspect of the Plato's epistemology out of that recreation. f. e. j. the analogy fo the fire and de sun or the process to turn the view from the external into the intelective. Very simple. I prefer Matrix recreation.
iventov 1 year ago
whats the name of the song playing in the background at 140?
MobileDudes 1 year ago
Ive just read the myth of the cave or whatever you want to call it. my mind = blown
MoOkS187 1 year ago
@MoOkS187 anyone who reads the entire dialogue realises that it's mostly about how the majority only see the 'shadows' of political machinations; when confronted with the reality they get a shock, and if they try to convince the cave-dwellers of the error they're perpetuating they can't get them to 'get it'.
One of the last few lines is to the effect that philosophers should always be OPPOSED to the quest for political power. WORD.
HieronymousAnonymous 1 week ago
Liked it. Though I have a gripe and that is about not giving any credits or source of the music.
hgnishsihsa 1 year ago
Awesome!
Akatam0t0ma 1 year ago
doesnt anyone see a comparison between The Matrix and Plato's cave?
I especially am refering to the scene where neo is told ppl are nothing more than bateries then he gets angry and distressed at first, vomits, collapses gets depressed and at last he acts uppon this knowledge.
GzusCriest 1 year ago
@GzusCriest Yes and its derived from this allegory and what you would expect from the human psyche, but the rest of the matrix was not more then a colourful way to display this allegory as well (with a story etc behind it, appealing to modern day people).
GenusCastor 1 year ago
Lol, I remember this last year. Used to tell the truth that most people don't try to find. In the passage, the men can't look apon objects directly, but theyre shadow, but slowly look at the direct object as if trying to find there own opinions and truths. FInally the direct truth is the sun itself. Enlightment of the world. The fire in the cave are suppose to be other peoples opinions that people believe. Like TV shows or politic infromation listened on the radio.
That's what I got from it.
YoukaiYoko 1 year ago
amazing shit this dude is a treasyrie
gpalegeo 1 year ago
Fantastic visual adaptation! This is so close to what I imagined when I read The Republic back in university!
BatteryEaters 1 year ago
What's up with the music...?
Kajra re from Bunty aur Bubli...wow. Who knew Bollywood would influence The Allegory of the Cave?
Veritas12Truth 2 years ago
hahaha all americans watch hollywood movies (which are not so different than shadows in the cave) but arabs are heroes of this video.. of course..
dtacha 2 years ago
Nice...Plato in play-doh
pumpkinshellz 2 years ago 32
They should have read the Allegory a little more closely. It's really important how angry the prisoner is at not understanding the real world. He only knows the shadows and at first the real world is the fake world to him. Not bad clay here, but for gods sakes get the shit right.
Armistace 2 years ago 48
it is an adaptation so he can kinda go whatever way he wants to look at it. o at least he went that far close
mmyyddddd 2 years ago 2
@Armistace watch?v=d2afuTvUzBQ
This is a more accurate showing of Plato's Allegory of the Cave from the Republic. They did say this video was an adaptation.
jiveturkeyusa 1 year ago
Good grief. After reading most of the comments, I first shook my head in pity at the intellectual vacuum and woeful derth of substantive curiosity; but then I shook my head in amusement. These comments: talk about appropriate. :-)
2323skidoo 2 years ago 2
this is in "the republic of plato" a text written by Plato who was the apostle of Socrates the prisoners are tied up facing a wall with a fire behind them and because a fire is in constant movement it acts as a puppeteer of sorts whenever anything comes between the fire and the prisoners now the story goes that the prisoner escapes the cave and after seeing the world for what it truly is desires to go back to tell the others when he does they kill him...you cannot speak of logos concerning being
bakerb30 2 years ago
ATTENTION EVERYONE: SOCRATES CAME UP WITH THIS CONCEPT. THE ACCOUNT PERSON JUST MADE THE VIDEO.
Just wanted to clarify :)
JeezVegas 2 years ago
One of the best and worst parts of this story is that its an abstract, it can be applied to almost anything in order to give it meaning. I wish I could have heard Platos perception of the story it would have been something to hear.
Bloodshotbuddah 2 years ago
i thought the prisoner escaped? and also the part where he came out upon the moon and the stars before the sun
aidanjr69 2 years ago
and in the end dont they kill him?
swtgirl101 2 years ago
im not sure, i thought they just said they would kill him if he kept talking about 'The World of Forms' but it could relate to when Socrates was killed after he thought he should be the leader in society
aidanjr69 2 years ago
Very dark, very disturbing. Sad, more then anything.
UnsociableZombieFoxx 2 years ago
perfect
pmatian 2 years ago
It's a really good way of showing Plato's idea, but it is important for all of those commenting to realise that the idea is not that of the people who made the video. The idea was thought up thousands of years ago. This video simply clarifies it in an easy-to-understand way.
Kudos to the people who made the video. I thought the narration and animation were both really effective.
YorkeTchock 2 years ago 3
this is the matrix!!!
drawfd 2 years ago
this is Plato...
hoggg11 2 years ago
no plato was a phillospher a long time ago
mq82288 2 years ago
dude listen , there is something called copyright , so Platos ideas are Platos ideas.... and matrix movie just use them.....
hoggg11 2 years ago
he/she means figuratively
PurplePigsGoMoo 2 years ago
I love claymation. Just like a Tool video.
creeperburg 2 years ago
this was very nice, the voice gave it a mytery feel to it.
good job.
msweeper23 3 years ago
i was thinking how the cave allegory is an apt description for television....all simulated.
But I would encourage everyone to go and actually read a translation of the original Plato passage yourselves.
Lots of wisdom there. You may find answers to other questions.
georgebushisawesome 3 years ago 4
audio sux on my pc...
Justwosweet 3 years ago
I just picked up this from stef zucconi's blog. my god....this is fantastic. this really blew me away. thanks and well done.
wierd thing is I have just come back from India where I made my own cave and lived in it for six months. I am also a freeman-on-the-land and have come out of the "allegorical cave". thanks again, you have made me very happy. rich. my space dotcom / zappasearcher
zappasearcher 3 years ago
i just saw your lottory story on the t.v and i heard you mention bullhead entertainment.. so i looked it up and it came up with this and i dont see why this isnt real popular its amazing!! the story is good and i love the claymation :) 5/5 and gratz on winning the lotto :)
ivgotmailyay 3 years ago