Interested in aircraft? download my "Aircraft Guide" to light civil aircraft APP for Iphones and smartphones. Ful colour photos, specifications on huge number of types. I have even researched unit costs. Check out Itunes or Android. Author: DalyArcade / Dermot Daly. Obviously the 182 is listed.
The "Leprechuan" music (that's funny) is Irish folk music played on traditional instruments, primariliy the hammer dulcimer, by Jerry Read Smith from his album "Songs from the Wood."
@3624nathan: No, that is what the fuel pump sounds like. It's actually the aux fuel pump, used for priming in fuel injected engines. The "normal" fuel pump is engine driven and you can't hear it over the sound of the engine.
god i miss flying the 182T, my instructor and i took our flight schools out to california from tampa, fl in it, landed at half moon bay while out there, great plane, fully loaded with xm radio, xm lightning, nexrad, tcas, tons of power, god i need to stop talking about it.
That's nice, but according to the composit NTSB it's more dangerous to fly a multi than a single.. Reason is one engine performance in most twins is dismal and you double the chances of an engine failure. They usually put on two engines not so you can have redundancy but so you can increase the available horsepower.
Look at the single engine performance figures for just about ANY general aviation twin and you will see the reason they have two engines is because they can't pack enough efficient HP into one.. You lose an engine and things unravel quickly. IMC or not.. At least in a single if you lose it, you can go straight into a glide without worrying about props and drag.
@texNoz nahhh in england you are strongly discouraged from going IMC in a SEP, you lose an engine and you are screwed. Plus a twin won't pass it's annual if it cannot be able to climb with one engine. Plus in a twin you can still get a variable pitch prop, so you dont have to worry about drag if you lose both engines, plus you probably have so much power you'd be at abotu Fl060 so you could glide down whereas in most SEPs you would end up at about 3000.
Of the thousands of annuals I've done, not ONCE have I performed a performance test on any aircraft to determine it's single engine performance. That's set by the manufacturer or the government authority, not the LAME.
I don't know of any twin that doesn't have CS props. You have to be able to feather the prop on your dead donk.. I don't understand your 6000/3000' relationship in that statement. Are you an experienced pilot?
@texNoz hard to explain over youtube. But I think the general consensus over at my club is that the twin would be prefered. And that's how I've been taught, even when flying with the CFI of my club. Well I guess if you have done thousands of annuals my opionion must be wrong. Had my PPL for about 4 months now and on 55 hours now. And soon starting hour building for CPL.
im just saying...cessna always has the greatest planes. I fly skyhawks, so im a skywawk person. Ive never flown a skylane, so Im quite partial to the skyhawk. But as with just about all cessnas, the skylane is a wonder
Well, I have flown a 2007 skyhawk SP with normal gauges, I have sat shotgun in a 182 and 172SP with a G1000, but for the most part i fly a 1979 cessna 172N
everytime I watch this video, i watch up to the "Hey Richard? Hey what? The glasses things, thats very attractive. Isn't it, I know, it shows my true age doesn't it?" and I laugh histerically!
El 182 T !! ¿la Tsignifica turbo? que vasto pana!! Aqui donde vivo he practicado el vuelo en un 182 del año 63, bur de usado. y me enseñaron que en vuelo crucero la configuracion es 22" manifold con 2300 RPM. En el momento a nivelar se regula potencia y se coloca esta configuracion, pero al momento de reducir las RPM la presion de manifold aumenta y hay que volver a ajustar manifold ¿Sabra alguien por que pasa esto? gracias
Fuel burn at 75% power (cruising) is 12.8 US gph. This figure is obtainable from the owner's handbook, and is accurate in practice. 75% power is obtained at 23" manifold pressure and 2400 rpm. Max cruising power is 80%, which will burn a couple of gallons per hour more, for not much increase in speed. Mixture setting lean of peak reduces fuel burn to around 11 gph, but then power is down slightly as well. The lean assist in the G1000 makes flying LoP easy and economical.
A rough average is 17.5 to 17 gal per hour at high speed cruise... thats for the turbo 182 so the consumption might be 1 or 2 gal per hour less in a normally aspirated
The 182T NAV III normally burns 15 g.p.h.. Density altitude will dictate other burn rates. There is a placard on the panel and POH will also have the recommendations. I fly with the lean mixture set to the top of the green which indicates 15 g.p.h. There is a process to lean out the engine based upon a cylinder on the Engine/system page on the MFD. When the lean is set to -50 degrees, you will find it is set at 15 g.p.h.
This has been flagged as spam show
Interested in aircraft? download my "Aircraft Guide" to light civil aircraft APP for Iphones and smartphones. Ful colour photos, specifications on huge number of types. I have even researched unit costs. Check out Itunes or Android. Author: DalyArcade / Dermot Daly. Obviously the 182 is listed.
derry365 4 weeks ago
Как бы я хотел купить себе Сессну!
mnedopizdy 1 month ago
Ok video.....terrible music.
Depdawg09 1 month ago
FOR ONCE I ACTUALLY LIKE MUSIC IN AN AVIATION VIDEO!
beepleboop99 3 months ago
what is the prop speed for i do not get it
123rcflyer 6 months ago 2
The "Leprechuan" music (that's funny) is Irish folk music played on traditional instruments, primariliy the hammer dulcimer, by Jerry Read Smith from his album "Songs from the Wood."
samlubus 7 months ago
I dig the leprechaun music, actually, what is it called? I like it.
Eagle77XS 7 months ago
Nice landing.
Minalover100 7 months ago
@Minalover100 he overshot ... it was not a good landing
85evinrude 5 days ago
Not too shabby although I could have done without the scary leprechaun music. So why is that motorhome parked on the end of the runway?
AA6RH 8 months ago
Yeah, Im a PP and Im flying a AeroBOERO 115hp
BRASIL FTW
:(
GoRamiro 8 months ago
@GoRamiro Brasil!!!! eu nao tenho carteira mas voo com o instrutor no FK9 mk4 100HP
comandantelucca 8 months ago
@GoRamiro Só na carona ashaushauhs
comandantelucca 8 months ago
@GoRamiro lol, at least you have a PPL!
cjracer1000 6 months ago
nice video!!!
cmte1alex 10 months ago
Douse that fuel pump need to be replaced or what? All I know is if it sounds like that its time to check it or get a new one?
3624nathan 11 months ago
@3624nathan: No, that is what the fuel pump sounds like. It's actually the aux fuel pump, used for priming in fuel injected engines. The "normal" fuel pump is engine driven and you can't hear it over the sound of the engine.
bgiesbrecht101 10 months ago
@bgiesbrecht101 ohhh ok
3624nathan 10 months ago
Can you tell me the name of the song?
alanzitou 11 months ago
scary turn!
fineamy2000 1 year ago
just imagine the g1000 was touchscreen
woodleyj99iscool 1 year ago
Cessna was the first plane i flew for my orientation flight for CAP... it was awesome!!!
AFutureMarine1 1 year ago 4
@AFutureMarine1 haha same here :) i loved it
used7issue 2 months ago
Awsome video! hope that you make more like it!!!
southwest1998 1 year ago
Very nice movie. Thanks for sharing.
Best wishes from Zurich, Switzerland.
(Irish folk music just perfect. The topping of the cake....)
kleinjogg 1 year ago
how steep are you banking at 2:59?
skysnet 1 year ago
@skysnet Just a steep turn maneuver. Taught to all pilots. Looks like 50 ish degress
KiDFRANKKK 11 months ago
Richard just gave me a great idea!
thehomevintner 1 year ago
next time please take out that gay King Henry the 8th music.
AmericanGi370 1 year ago
this guys rich with his huge gps
BiCyClE98cArDs 1 year ago
Nice turn
MrEliben 1 year ago
lovely video and music
airbornerat 1 year ago
is N464SN this airplane in the video? Is this your personally owned airplane?
dbflyboy917 1 year ago
god i miss flying the 182T, my instructor and i took our flight schools out to california from tampa, fl in it, landed at half moon bay while out there, great plane, fully loaded with xm radio, xm lightning, nexrad, tcas, tons of power, god i need to stop talking about it.
cbcatcher007 1 year ago
My friend has been flying his 172 for 21 years, and he always does that and never had a engine fire.
MrKraftwerk1 1 year ago
The likely hood of an engine fire on start up is so low. I think its completely irrelevant if you have your headset on or not...
slowmocrow 1 year ago
Comment removed
oliverman22 1 year ago
Hey idiot. Headphones don't go on 'til after engine start.
jamie140 1 year ago
@jamie140
who gives a crap? I leave mine on too
chestateegold 1 year ago
@chestateegold Safety always. You don't want to be friggin' around with a headset if you catch fire on start up.
jamie140 1 year ago
@chestateegold Safety always. You don't want to be friggin' around with a headset if you catch fire on start up.
jamie140 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@chestateegold Safety always. You don't want to be friggin' around with a headset if you catch fire on start up.
jamie140 1 year ago
@jamie140
how would a headseat screw you up? grab the fire extiguisher and blast away. noting that a headset will prevent from happening.
chestateegold 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@chestateegold Safety always. You don't want to be friggin' around with a headset if you catch fire on start up.
jamie140 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@chestateegold Not safe. You don't want to be frigging around with a headset in the event of fire on startup.
jamie140 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@chestateegold Not safe. You don't want to be frigging around with a headset in the event of fire on startup.
jamie140 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@chestateegold Not safe. You don't want to be frigging around with a headset in the event of fire on startup.
jamie140 1 year ago
I love multiprop more... because they are more trustable for me :DDDD One engine fails... you have another.....
FruityLoopsas 1 year ago
That's nice, but according to the composit NTSB it's more dangerous to fly a multi than a single.. Reason is one engine performance in most twins is dismal and you double the chances of an engine failure. They usually put on two engines not so you can have redundancy but so you can increase the available horsepower.
texNoz 1 year ago
@texNoz Can't be. I'd much prefer to go in IMC in a twin then a SEP.
joedaviesuk1 1 year ago
@joedaviesuk1
It can't be because you prefer it not be?
Look at the single engine performance figures for just about ANY general aviation twin and you will see the reason they have two engines is because they can't pack enough efficient HP into one.. You lose an engine and things unravel quickly. IMC or not.. At least in a single if you lose it, you can go straight into a glide without worrying about props and drag.
texNoz 1 year ago
@texNoz nahhh in england you are strongly discouraged from going IMC in a SEP, you lose an engine and you are screwed. Plus a twin won't pass it's annual if it cannot be able to climb with one engine. Plus in a twin you can still get a variable pitch prop, so you dont have to worry about drag if you lose both engines, plus you probably have so much power you'd be at abotu Fl060 so you could glide down whereas in most SEPs you would end up at about 3000.
joedaviesuk1 1 year ago
@joedaviesuk1
Of the thousands of annuals I've done, not ONCE have I performed a performance test on any aircraft to determine it's single engine performance. That's set by the manufacturer or the government authority, not the LAME.
I don't know of any twin that doesn't have CS props. You have to be able to feather the prop on your dead donk.. I don't understand your 6000/3000' relationship in that statement. Are you an experienced pilot?
texNoz 1 year ago
@texNoz hard to explain over youtube. But I think the general consensus over at my club is that the twin would be prefered. And that's how I've been taught, even when flying with the CFI of my club. Well I guess if you have done thousands of annuals my opionion must be wrong. Had my PPL for about 4 months now and on 55 hours now. And soon starting hour building for CPL.
joedaviesuk1 1 year ago
i like this plane and piper arrows
chris5812341234 1 year ago
Does anybody know if glass cockpit Cessnas are equipped with doppler radar?
TPS996 2 years ago
No they would need to ad an external radar pod. But you can get xm satellite wx radar.
cortezpilot 2 years ago
I just flew one of these today!!! AWSOME!!!! very fast, very nice airplane!
dbflyboy917 2 years ago
fast? haha
when i flew one they were heavy as to fly
fenderish 2 years ago
yes, they do handle heavier than an older 172 or a 152, but they are really fast for the type of plane they are.
dbflyboy917 2 years ago
These are very nice, But remember, its from the skyhawk :)
hersheytrojans01 2 years ago
@hersheytrojans01 so...
dbflyboy917 2 years ago
im just saying...cessna always has the greatest planes. I fly skyhawks, so im a skywawk person. Ive never flown a skylane, so Im quite partial to the skyhawk. But as with just about all cessnas, the skylane is a wonder
hersheytrojans01 2 years ago
@hersheytrojans01 Ah, ok, I didn't understand very well your last msg. Do you fly G1000 Skyhawks? Skyhawk SPs?
dbflyboy917 2 years ago
Comment removed
1234567890bf2 2 years ago
@dbflyboy917
Well, I have flown a 2007 skyhawk SP with normal gauges, I have sat shotgun in a 182 and 172SP with a G1000, but for the most part i fly a 1979 cessna 172N
hersheytrojans01 2 years ago
everytime I watch this video, i watch up to the "Hey Richard? Hey what? The glasses things, thats very attractive. Isn't it, I know, it shows my true age doesn't it?" and I laugh histerically!
dbflyboy917 2 years ago
@dbflyboy917 You won't be laughing so much when you get to be the age that needs to do that like I do! Lol
ridgerunner98570 8 months ago
Does the 182 have a turbine engine or a normal piston engine...?
crazypilot123 2 years ago
they are offered in both, but if i had to guess this one is piston
chestateegold 2 years ago
What are you talking about?
Both versions are piston powered; one is turbo-charged.
glewisfly 2 years ago
@glewisfly
i thought that the c182t was turbine. like a jet engine running a prop. nvm, learn somehting new everyday i suppose
chestateegold 2 years ago
just kidding, it says in the description that it is turbo
chestateegold 2 years ago
Normal piston engine ;)
kjartan95 2 years ago
piston
lacerdajf 2 years ago
boy i wish i had a spare 300g's sitting around for that....
PropHead30 2 years ago
loan bud, that is the best way to get this airplane
dbflyboy917 2 years ago
do u find it relli fun flying
hargreavesjn123 2 years ago
Hey what a great crew... Gotta love the aviation humor... :0) I hear Venice is a nice airport...
Firstofficer30 2 years ago
Riding in this type for the first time tomorrow.....should I be worried?
CHUGNRUN 2 years ago
Sometimes the G1000 PFD lags but the 182 is a durable airplane.
Transam941 2 years ago
One hell of a turn at 3:14
agentfazexx 2 years ago
Even a Cessna 182T turns on a sixpence / dime!
ChrizRockster 2 years ago
Nice video,sharp lookin plane!! Working on my Light Sport cetificate here,and bought my 1st little bird. Will have to fly to Venice someday.
nmbnutz 2 years ago
Purring like a little kitten!
ChrizRockster 2 years ago 2
Hell yeah!
agentfazexx 2 years ago
dude a few hours earlier today i got a ride in the front of one of these things for free!!!
gunsnironmetallica 2 years ago
Great!
alphabravo0102 2 years ago
I love it!
basser7472 2 years ago
NICE PLANEE =)
niiiicco 2 years ago
WOW. I just flew in a 1992' 182 today and i wanna put the video up!!
P0wningPrince 2 years ago
El 182 T !! ¿la Tsignifica turbo? que vasto pana!! Aqui donde vivo he practicado el vuelo en un 182 del año 63, bur de usado. y me enseñaron que en vuelo crucero la configuracion es 22" manifold con 2300 RPM. En el momento a nivelar se regula potencia y se coloca esta configuracion, pero al momento de reducir las RPM la presion de manifold aumenta y hay que volver a ajustar manifold ¿Sabra alguien por que pasa esto? gracias
CartubeloS 2 years ago
Fuel burn at 75% power (cruising) is 12.8 US gph. This figure is obtainable from the owner's handbook, and is accurate in practice. 75% power is obtained at 23" manifold pressure and 2400 rpm. Max cruising power is 80%, which will burn a couple of gallons per hour more, for not much increase in speed. Mixture setting lean of peak reduces fuel burn to around 11 gph, but then power is down slightly as well. The lean assist in the G1000 makes flying LoP easy and economical.
fox3cho 2 years ago
A rough average is 17.5 to 17 gal per hour at high speed cruise... thats for the turbo 182 so the consumption might be 1 or 2 gal per hour less in a normally aspirated
tot173 2 years ago
Can some one please tell be the hourly fuel consumption on the
Cessna 182 g1000 thanks!
futurepilot764 2 years ago
The 182T NAV III normally burns 15 g.p.h.. Density altitude will dictate other burn rates. There is a placard on the panel and POH will also have the recommendations. I fly with the lean mixture set to the top of the green which indicates 15 g.p.h. There is a process to lean out the engine based upon a cylinder on the Engine/system page on the MFD. When the lean is set to -50 degrees, you will find it is set at 15 g.p.h.
cessnamustangpilot 2 years ago
has an airoplane ever been stolen from an airfield? crazy question sorry
cjellwood 2 years ago
yup it happend before lol
federalfsx 2 years ago
mybe they should make magneto switches with a removeable key.
umahuma4 2 years ago
umahuma4 - Why?
ChrizRockster 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
xoxo ? ?
linoleumcarving 3 years ago
Sammmmmmmy!!!! This was awesome! More awesome to see you! Didn't even know you flew! xoxo
BerlinLynn 3 years ago