Added: 5 years ago
From: gastonalejandro8
Views: 43,698
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (43)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • zweimal krieg verloren !!!

    bis heute ist deutschland besetzt von usa und uk !!

    die deutschen politiker sind marionetten des angloamerikanisches doktrin.

  • @IvanGrozny100

    Quit complaining. Without American dominance, you would still be wearing lederhosen and listening to oomph-pah-pah music, instead of wearing jeans and listening to rock and roll.

  • Propaganda Bullshit,kein einiziger zerstörter Deutscher Panzer in der Berichterstattung.

  • so ist es bofflunz!

    die meisten hätten mitgemacht, die heute total gegen den nationalstolz sind.

  • lange habe ich gedacht, krieg sei immer zu vermeiden. halt typisches 68-er produkt. wenn ich aber daran denke, daß die deutschen voller überzeugeung als nationalisten in den kampf zogen (wohlgemerkt nicht als nazis) wie das eigentlich jede nation europas zu der zeit propagierte und wenn ich daran denke wie auch die füherschaft damals war so denke ich, daß auch ich damls diesem deutschen heer gerne angehört hätte ohne böses im gedanken zu haben.

  • for you englishspeakers ;) enemies tanks are attacking - -report to behind- -very fast mobile artillery shots wholes in the attacking enemie lines- break -on the horizont the burning sowjet tanks.Now our grenadiers are storming forwards- break -strong stuka forces are doing there thing,too.- -the attack of the sowjets doesnt become dangerous- -wounded and prisonered sowjets are crossing the way of our forwards storming tanks- break -the battle continues-
  • Kursk was the main battle at the eastern front-not Stalingrad!-the battle of Kursk brought the decision- prehaps for the whole war-it was the last attempt of the Wehrmacht for getting offensive again-they failed-after that there was only one way for them - BACK

    " Vorwärts, Kameraden!-wir müssen zurück...!"

  • The nazi's celebrated their defeat before Moscow by declaring war on the USA,Idiot nazi goons went downhill from their,Germany 0-2 in WW's

  • @bv141a

    All they did was to "formalize" an existing situation. For months the USA had been firing on German warships, and giving aid openly to Britain. See the Kearney and Ruben James incidents involving US destroyers and U-Boats, both predating Pearl Harbor. (USA 0-2 in those incidents).

  • @goldenhawk352 After P Hbr America was engaged in the pacific,where public support wanted revenge on the Japanese.Hitler by declaring war on US,brought American power to Europe instead

  • barbaroe este video

  • THEY WAS THE BEST!!!!

  • 2:41 - oh look, they won!

  • claiming that any race is better than another is racist and just exposes how zenophobic u actually are!

  • Do your homework! There's lots of double-blind studies with environmental controls that show differences in race and intelligence.

    Granted these are median results (there are still some smart black people) but it's pretty compelling.

    Google Charles Murray and James Flynn. Not that I support "racial clensing", but immigration policy is fair game.

  • you do your homework bitch. there is only one human race and no specific group of the human race is better than another.

  • What do you mean by better? Higher IQ. I made a little video series on this, the evidence is quite clear.

  • your facts are mixed up.

  • What so the different races don't have different average IQs? And please, I didn't just find some IQ stats and go "aw gee, I guess I'll make me a video!".

  • the russians lost 866.000 men the germans 60.000 in the battle of kusrk

  • The russians always paid a steep price when they defeated the germans in battle. Kursk was actually not a huge victory for the russians. They lost more than the germans and merely made the germans continue on a retreat.

  • Oh realy....pure huh?Turks dont screw Germans these days?

  • i can say that the germans are the best people that exist...their blood is pure...and the soviet only could win cause the number of weapons and soldier...

  • ^ nazi

  • stupid comment and stupid opinion

  • excelente

  • Russians may have won the war, but look who is ahead now....

  • The name "wotan" kind of gives your true face away boyo.

  • Tell me, what's my true face, either here, or in my mailbox at your option, and I will let you know, how close did you get with your assumptions.

  • Glad the krautland scum got their asses kicked. You can hear the arrogance in that voice! It was a huge defeat, but the agitprop machine spun it as a victory. They kept up with that nonsense until Ivan kicked down the Bunker door. Stupid krauts.

  • They were overwhelmed by sheer numbers. Your arrogant declarative statement: "Stupid krauts." actually finely characterizes you, not them.

  • == They were overwhelmed by sheer numbers. Soviet tactics and weapons improved in the face of the Nazi onslaught.  It was more than "sheer numbers." Of course Hilter's strategic decisions didn't help.

  • Kinda like Bush's "Mission Accomplished" speech eh?

  • God, I hate Germans; for what they did (hahaha, tried to do, anyway) to Russia (my ancestral homeland) so many times, the Great Patriotic War DEFINITELY not being the first time (and probably not the last). I hate them, but I can deeply respect them for simply being able to survive after the tremendous beating they took by the Sons of Rus'.

  • Germans won the battle of kursk tacticly, but lost it publicly. They inflicted 3x the casualties on the Russians, but because Hitler was so stupid, he ordered them to retreat in the midst of victory.

  • I don't know where you've got your information, witchdoctor180. If you mean tactical victory, that they could break through the Soviets first or second line defence at certain points in the South of the salient and they have inflicted more casualties, than they received, you maybe right, but otherwise it is a rather ludicrous statement. Casualty was seldom a problem with the Soviets, who enjoyed large numerical superiority. Because of the character limitation, I can not go into details,

  • but it is the Soviets' strategic plan which worked in Kursk, not the other way around. The best German armored formations have bogged down, in the thick networks of deep strategic defences of the Soviets. Germany never achieved the strategic mobility, which was necessary for them for victory. Specially desperate was the situation, in the North of the salient, where the Germans only advanced a few miles and a huge counterattack developed to the sector immediatelly north of them,

  • threatening to envelop them. It was imperative to them to go into strategic defence and even then, they lost a huge tract of territory in a few weeks time as they tried to slow down the tide of the Soviets, during their fighting retreat. Quite a few experienced German generals saw this likely outcome, but their Fuehrer and a few up-and-coming carrierist in the Heer didn't listen to them and Germany paid the price for their follie.

  • you surely did ur homework... my compliment Wotan20.

  • la voz del relator es muy buena.

  • Well, I don't like this voice, it's annoying and it doesn't make me feel proud. Propaganda at its best, he talks about how victorious this battle is. Fact is, the Wehrmacht lost the battle of Kursk. Media in the 3rd Reich.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more